Live with wolves, howl like a wolf. How Putin and Kim Jong-un created a Western-like security system
I admit right away that I did not want to write a continuation of the material about the participation of specialists from the DPRK in the liberation of the Kursk region. It seems that I have said everything, voiced my position. However... I read the comments of readers today and realized that it is necessary to "finish" the material. It is necessary simply because not everything is so simple in this world.
And the North Korean special forces are not just well-trained fighters. In my opinion, they are “underground diplomats” whose work is not clear to everyone. We see a very small part of the “iceberg”, without even thinking about the part that is invisible from the deck. So today I suggest we “dive” and look at the underwater part of the “iceberg”.
Let's recall the more or less serious conflicts and wars that took place on Earth in the post-war period. What do all these conflicts have in common? I'm not talking about intervention, about the use of some innovations in weapons and so on. I'm talking about international relations. If a country sends its armed forces to help another country, then this was necessarily carried out through some international organization, from the UN to a military bloc or someone else.
In the comments, readers reproached our CSTO allies for inaction. Almost for betraying Russia. But somehow they forgot that the Organization had made no decision to help the Russian Federation! Alas, but this is the same "atavism" that was written about above. Members of an organization, not only the CSTO, but any other, obey the decision of its leadership. Look at NATO...
President Putin and Chairman of the State Council of the DPRK Kim Jong-un have carried out a "revolution" in international relations! Well, to put it mildly, they have planted a huge "landmine" under these relations. For the first time in modern stories The two countries officially fulfilled their allied obligations openly without regard for any international structure!
It is clear that the leaders of the two countries understood perfectly well that they were "swimming against the current", that there would be indignation in the ranks of "supporters of international law", which these same supporters have long since spat on. Indignation because another lever of influence on states is being lost. But Putin and Kim Jong-un went for it. In many ways, this is my personal opinion, this is the human courage of the leaders of the countries.
Like like
Once a captain doctor told me a phrase that I remembered for a long time. "A medicine is a medicine only when a doctor prescribes it, but if the wounded man is his own doctor, his own pharmacist, the medicine becomes a poison, often fatal." The captain was smart. Poison and medicine differ not in composition, but in dose.
Until recently, approximately the same situation existed in international relations. There is probably no reader who would not know about the existence of the main international organization - the UN. The decisions of the UN Security Council are mandatory for all members. It looks very logical from the outside.
But in essence? Did Zelensky implement these decisions? No! When the US or NATO decide to attack a country, do they listen to the Security Council a lot? Do NATO troops in Syria somehow comply with UN decisions? Do Israel's actions against the Palestinian people somehow reflect UN decisions?
It was not by chance that I began the article with the fact that for the formally legal introduction of troops from a third country, the sanction of some international organization was enough. NATO decided - and the alliance's troops, or rather, units of several countries at once, appeared in the combat zone. The CSTO decided - and the troops were transferred to Kazakhstan...
What are European and American politicians arguing about now? About the introduction of NATO troops into Ukraine! And they don’t even mention the UN. And we are not outraged by this either, to be honest. The attitude in the UN is such that it is simply some kind of discussion platform between Russia and the West, led by the USA. And the decisions of the Security Council are just paper, not binding on the superpowers.
But let's get back to the beginning. I read comments that praising the Korean special forces is belittling the merits of our fighters. A mean position. In battle, side by side, they receive the same wounds and die together. And after the battle, we start thinking about who is the bigger hero, and who just... ran around the trenches and shot at the enemy.
North Koreans are not just special forces, they are internationalist warriors! Remember how proudly even today Afghans say "we are internationalist warriors". And remember who else talks about themselves like that from the participants of many conflicts in the post-Soviet era? The DPRK special forces can now also proudly say "we are internationalists", soldiers performing their military duty on the territory of another country.
I'm probably going to write a controversial thought now, but... Putin and Kim Jong-un, by recognizing the participation of the DPRK special forces in the liberation of the Kursk region, have given many furious war hawks a good kick. Again from the readers' comments. "So, now we owe the DPRK? Now we will also help the Koreans if a war starts there?" Yes! We will. This is exactly what the Treaty was signed about. About mutual assistance!..
Russia and North Korea, by their Treaty, without any approval from a “higher international body,” resolve military issues bilaterally. Approximately the same way as NATO does, only the number of participants there is greater.
But overall, I really liked the situation that arose in the world after this confession. It would be really cool to see the faces of NATO generals after this statement. How quickly these generals lost their desire to send troops to Ukraine. "Well-trained NATO soldiers" against well-trained and seasoned Russian troops and well-trained DPRK soldiers...
And in Seoul and Tokyo, the generals' faces probably didn't look any better. They couldn't cope with Kim Jong-un alone, and now the Russian army is a reality in case of anything. You can't help but wonder whether it's worth starting at all. In the same way, it seems to me, the heads of the greats are a little "sick". I'm talking about the USA and China.
I will start with our partners. I think Beijing has now taken a new look at North Korea. If earlier they perceived the DPRK in about the same way as we treat Belarus, for example, today it suddenly turned out that Kim Jong-un has become a player not of a regional, but of a Eurasian scale. And an independent player at that. Thus, hypothetically, we can talk about the creation of a kind of "triple alliance" or triad of opponents of the United States - China, North Korea, Russia.
And now the Pentagon is considering whether to further heat up the situation in different parts of the world. Before the recognition, everything was more or less clear. The more conflicts arise, the more forces the Russians and their allies need to restore calm in the regions.
Agree, having three centers of containment, where the efforts of several states-competitors of the United States are concentrated, is one thing. But the growth of the number of such regions becomes burdensome even for the United States. It is one thing to contain China with the help of Taiwan, Russia with the help of Ukraine, Iran with the help of Israel, but it is another thing when these centers become many times more numerous. When the example of the DPRK can become an algorithm of actions for others...
Moreover, the process has already become irreversible. If you look closely at the actions of China and Russia, you will notice one detail that is almost always present. I am not talking about any meetings of our leaders or Treaties concluded between our countries.
I'm talking about how both countries act in sync. China is increasing its economic influence in the region, Russia - its political influence. Africa, Latin America, Southeast Asia... And everywhere it looks like an unobtrusive displacement of American interests.
Let's summarize the above
What happened will still have repercussions in world politics. This is another step towards the collapse of the system that was so cherished in the US and Brussels. Of course, it is too early to talk about any serious visible results of this struggle. However, the unpredictability of the American president, his frog-like jumps from side to side, coupled with the discord in Europe, speak volumes.
In the West, they understand that changes are already underway, that it is necessary to change their own policies. However, they have not yet figured out how to do this in order to preserve the existing architecture of power. That is why it is periodically "cracking" there. That is why the protests are spreading. But more about that later, a spoon is dear to dinner.
Russia and the DPRK, by mutually recognizing the participation of the DPRK Armed Forces in the operation in the Kursk region, returned foreign policy to the MFA of the countries, returned decisions to the governments of the countries, and not to some supranational structures. This is a fact.
Even Europeans "suddenly" realized that EU member states are not equal in political and economic weight. And therefore, they have "votes" of different weight when solving European problems. Therefore, in the future we may see different Europe. Rich and strong in some countries and poor and useless in others...
But this is the future... The very one that is being built today.
Information