Military Review

Thierry Maysan: The most interesting thing is that Russia has allies within the American system

30
Thierry MAYSAN, a French orientalist, political scientist, conspiracy theorist of the book on the policy of the United States in the Middle East and many other sensational publications, who has been constantly in the Middle East region in recent years, predicts drastic and paradoxical changes in the situation in this part of the world in numbers “However” 28 (137) from October 8 (2012 and 02 (151) from January 28 (2013). More about this, he tells in an interview with Mikhail Leontiev.


You talked about the spread of American Middle East policy. What is happening now?

- Today, the United States abandons the old logic in the Middle East. Previously, the region was considered by them as a reservoir of petroleum products. Such was the Carter doctrine, in accordance with which the US Central Command was created and troops deployed in large numbers. At that time, America wanted to be sure that it would have free access to oil products in the region. Now the Americans are convinced that they have achieved energy independence, and consequently, there is no longer any need to contain so many military in the Middle East; on the contrary, it is time to make a smooth turn and redeploy troops from Europe and the Middle East to the Far East in order to prepare for a confrontation with China.

In addition, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Americans were not just close, and indeed the suffocating embrace of Israel. Of course, no one is going to throw Israel, but the intention is to distance themselves from it, to not be forced to conduct a policy, which is dictated by Tel Aviv.

What's the role for Russia? What do you think she should do and what pitfalls we can get there?

- After the collapse of the USSR, Russia was cut off from the Middle East, and now it is extremely important for it to establish itself at least somehow. There are huge deposits of cheap natural gas in this region, so Russia, which has ambitions to control the global gas market, should be present there. The United States is going to make a “gift” of Russia, opening the way to the Middle East for it, and thus divert it from rapprochement with China.

The Americans are well aware that if Russia returns to the Middle East, it will give them the opportunity to move away from Israel. A million Israelis come from the United States, but the second million comes from the former Soviet Union, so the Russian presence in the region will guarantee peace and stability, with the result that the United States will be able to spend significantly less money to ensure Israel’s security.

But the Americans, of course, are not philanthropists coli and allowed to return, it is not just so, and all of this can, of course, turn into a trap. Since the days of Carter and Brzezinski in the United States was a powerful anti-Russian coalition of Western states and Islamic movements. We all watched the activities of the coalition in Afghanistan, the Balkans and Chechnya. It is possible to re-use this coalition to draw Russia into another conflict.

However, there is another aspect. Coalition, push terrorism practically everywhere and stringing up permanent victory over Russia, is now experiencing serious difficulties and slowly falling apart, because in Syria it was defeated. And now the big question is whether this coalition will survive, or the arrival of Russia in the region finally finish it.

The most interesting thing is that Russia has allies within the American system. It is possible to interpret the American military strategy in different ways, but many representatives of the establishment are convinced that if America is facing a confrontation with China, it cannot even afford conflict relations with Russia. According to John Brennan, the new head of the CIA, the United States itself must not only dismantle the coalition, but also destroy its physically separate leaders, which they themselves have cultivated. The CIA already has plans to sweep the leaders of the Free Syrian Army, Al-Qaida and the Al-Nusra Front.

That is, there is a field for the transaction?

- Of course. Moscow and Washington have space for bargaining. It is only important to choose the right negotiators, because Washington is very heterogeneous. The administration has always had people who did not want to hear anything about peace with Russia and were ready to go all the way and at any cost. Such was, for example, the position of David Petraeus, who planned the secret war in Syria and was not going to stop it. Hillary Clinton, too, stood her ground. She represented the pro-Israel lobby and demanded the defeat of Syria.

We must understand that part of the military establishment, in principle, can not imagine an existence outside of the conflict. We are talking about the military, who led NATO missile defense system and taxiing. These people are not ready for peaceful relations with Russia.

The aforementioned policy removed from the administration, so confrontation over Russia moved to Congress, where also there are various anti-Russian groups. Some defend the interests of Israel, no matter the cost to the United States, others are directly related to Dick Cheney and those who worked on the country's energy security. Representatives of large energy corporations are convinced that it is necessary to finish the job and take Syria, for they have long been divided between all its minerals.

Which group will prevail depends on the economic context. Because of the crisis in the country, Obama is trying to find a new equilibrium point in the world. He perfectly understands that the status of the world's sole and sole superpower is too expensive for the United States. During the Cold War, when the world was divided, everything was simpler, costs were much lower, the United States inexpensively secured a dominant position in the desired part of the world. Therefore, Obama wants to return to the previous type of relations, to achieve a full-fledged treaty with Russia not only in Syria, but throughout the region.

If the plan works, what happens with Iran, Syria and the Gulf monarchies?

- So far the most promising is the idea of ​​joint control of the United States and Russia in the region. To do this, you need to start to make peace in Syria, and retaining Bashar al-Assad in power, because without it no peace in Syria is possible in principle. No matter what his words may be for the last two years, you will have to put up with him, moreover, in your position, because there is simply no other way out. There may be a question about the annexation of part of the territory of Syria. We are talking about the north of the country, the lands that may have to be transferred to Turkey as payment for its participation in the war, because Turkey is necessary for the United States.

And then it will be necessary to resolve the issue with Israel. There is an intention to hold a conference in Moscow on the problems of the region, at which decisions will be taken on the type of the Madrid Peace Conference, and not on the Oslo agreements. That is, the two world powers will once again launch the process of settling the Palestinian question, which will be considered together with the problem of the Golan Heights, occupied by Israel. The new Obama administration has already returned people who participated in the Madrid conference and worked on a peace settlement project for the Middle East problem at the end of Bill Clinton's rule, when talks were held in the US and Geneva with Hafez al-Assad on the eve of his death.

But why should we link the issue of the Golan Heights with the Palestinian issue? After all, the issue of the Golan Heights was virtually decided (the talks mediated by Turkey, which it is, and were foiled). The Palestinian issue is so complicated that it is unclear why they are considered together?

- Madeleine Albright was well aware that it was impossible to make peace in stages, although agreements were reached with Egypt and Jordan. The Syrian people will never accept peace without a solution to the Palestinian issue, especially to the detriment of the Palestinians. And this is an ideological question, not related to the position of the state. At the same time, it is very difficult to make peace with the Palestinians, because they are too fragmented, new groups are constantly being formed, which oppose the agreements already reached. There is only one force in the entire region that can force the Palestinians to abide by their own decisions - this is Syria. Therefore, the problem of the Golan Heights and should be addressed simultaneously with the Palestinian issue.

But Hamas has defected to Qatar! Syria can now impose Hamas?

“Hamas did not go over to the side of Qatar, but Qatar supports individual Hamas figures.” Hamas is divided into groups, and Qatar simply bought the political elite of Hamas, which is part of the Muslim Brotherhood. This process has indeed already gone far, so Khaled Mishal, who had been hiding in Damascus for many years, relocated to Qatar before returning to Cairo after the elections of Mursi. But as for the military wing of Hamas, it receives weapons from Iran and is fully oriented towards it.

Two months ago, battles were fought in Syria around the Palestinian Yarmuk camp. There were 180 thousand Palestinians. And when the al-Qaeda fighters came to seize the camp, they were accompanied, on the one hand, by the leaders of HAMA S, and on the other - by the officers of the Mossad. They went there all together, they were given tough resistance, but the officers of the Mossad had a detailed camp plan, which gave the attackers the opportunity to find and destroy those Hamas leaders who were at that time in the camp and did not share the policies of the attackers.

Attack eventually petered out, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, who defended the camp, won a victory, but battles were bloody and Palestinians fought with each other, because the defense kept the people of George Habash, who died not long ago, a Palestinian Marxist camp defended by members of his party.

As for the future of Palestine, Washington is planning to create a federation, which will include the Palestinian territories and Jordan, and power will be transferred to all the same "Muslim Brotherhood" who already rule in Egypt, Libya, Tunisia and Morocco. This will make it possible to state that the Palestinians have their own state and there is no way back.

We must understand that the recognition by the Assembly of the UN special status of Palestine as a state not recognized, but recognized as an observer, was the first step towards the creation of such a Jordanian-Palestinian federation. For, in fact, it means that since the Palestinians already have a state, if still not recognized, they do not have a right to a different home. That is the flip side of that statement is a tacit assertion that Palestinians can no longer lay claim to the land occupied by Israel.

As part of this logic, all the occupied territories will remain with Israel, and the Jordan-Palestinian Federation will include only a small piece of Palestinian land. If you look back, we will see what else the British wanted to make a Palestinian state out of Jordan, they were even going to move the Palestinians there by force. Subsequently, this happened; only in Israel was the group of particularly hard-nosed people delayed, who sooner or later will be deprived of their nationality and squeezed out of the country. There is also an intention to dissolve all other Palestinians by depriving them of their nationality. That is to make Lebanese Palestinians from Lebanon, Syrians - Palestinians from Syria, Egyptians - living in Egypt and Jordanians who live in Jordan.

This plan can work, because it gives peace to the people who have been living in a state of permanent war. But it can not last forever, because this decision is too unfair and will be realized as unacceptable.

And what will happen to the Gulf?

- Now everyone is preparing for the rapid collapse of Saudi Arabia. The king is seriously ill and is no longer able to rule the country. He no longer even understands that he is the head of state. The clan of the now ruling Saudis is the most reactionary of all the branches of the ruling family. Of course, the Saudis will try to seize power after the death of King Abdullah, although it will be illegitimate. At the same time, the entire population of the country, divided into groups, has long been ready for an open uprising and is waiting only for the death of the king - in a word, the continuity of power will be impeded.

During the time of Roosevelt and King Ibn Saud, the United States guaranteed the support of the Saudis dynasty in exchange for Gulf oil. But now the situation has changed dramatically - the Americans are able to provide themselves with petroleum products. And to support the Saudis means to further discredit themselves, because these people hate everything.

Therefore, the old Pentagon’s plan, called "The withdrawal of the Saudis from Arabia." According to this draft, Saudi Arabia is supposed to be divided into five parts, three of which will become independent states, and two will become part of neighboring states. Apparently, all this will happen automatically as soon as the king dies. That is, the country will disintegrate itself.

As for Qatar, everything is much more complicated there. After all, Qatar is not a completely state, it is rather an enterprise, and not an autonomous one. Qatar is a “daughter” of a large concern - BG Group. That is, it is the governing body of the British oil company, in whose territory the largest American military base is located.

Qatar is engaged in all sorts of illegal operations. In essence, he is what “Turtle Island” was for pirates. That is, this is a territory with signs of the state, which allows the British to wrap large amounts of cash, buy everything they need, and pay for, among other things, international terrorism in Syria or in the Caucasus.

Qatar itself just will not die, although there will also be a problem with the inheritance of power. The current Emir of Qatar is not legitimate, he overthrew his father, so the other branch of the family will claim the throne after his death. In any case, the British and the Americans never let go of this much-needed state.

Another nuance. There are very close ties between the French ruling class and Qatar. While serving as President Nicolas Sarkozy, the Emir of Qatar made him different expensive gifts. For example, in Paris, a private jet was parked Emir, where the president's wife could at any time go shopping in another country.

Then the emir began buying in the heart of Paris luxury mansions, is an architectural monument and needed permission for home remodeling buildings. He successfully corrupted the entire French elite, as members of the administration and politicians of right and left. During the last presidential election openly sponsored by the Emir of both candidates, but a bet made on Olanda. Moreover, Laurent Fabius, former French Prime Minister, personally went to Qatar for money. So now the French rulers in an obvious debt to the Emir of Qatar.

When Sarkozy was still president, he signed a tax treaty with Qatar, which has a terrific point, according to him members of the ruling family of Qatar shall be exempt from tax if transact or invest in France. In exchange, the Emir proposed Nicolas Sarkozy to lead a private fund for Qatari investment funds in Europe.

Now that Qatar has bought the French elite, he is about to launch the French version of Al-Jazeera channel. The plan has existed for a long time, but it was not allowed to go, but now the road is open. The channel will start broadcasting modestly so as not to annoy anyone, and then there will be a sharp turn, as was the case with the Arabic version of Al-Jazeera. That is, the media resource will work to ensure the Wahhabi of the Muslim population of France and thereby create an insoluble problem for French society. And the customers are, of course, the British.

And what will happen to Jerusalem?

- Jerusalem, unlike everything else, has a symbolic value. Of course, the city should be the capital of both Palestinians and Israelis, which was once the goal, but everyone understands that this is absolutely impossible. Obviously, and the other - the current owners of the city, occupying Palestine, are not ready to give the shrine for free use to representatives of different faiths, as required. Therefore, the conflict around Jerusalem will not fade, no matter how the situation is resolved with everything else. And as far as I know, in the plans relating to the Jordan-Palestinian autonomy, there is no point about giving the Palestinians even partial control over East Jerusalem.

And Turkey is not nadorvetsya in their superhuman efforts?

“Since Turkey is a member of NATO, the Americans will support it by all means.” But the country plunged into the Syrian conflict so deeply, and so ugly that the government turned out to be rejected by the population.

Турция сразу попыталась оккупировать север Сирии. Когда военные действия только начинались, в news сводках постоянно говорили о том, что Свободная сирийская армия закрепилась в том или ином приграничном городе, то есть было очевидно, что наступление идет извне, а не развивается внутри страны. Когда наемники вошли на территорию Сирии, они получили определенную поддержку в приграничных сельских областях, населенных турками. Это не имело никакого отношения к политике или внутренним проблемам страны — просто сработала этническая близость.

Then, Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan appointed a manager, whose task was to control Syrian refugees in Turkey. In fact, this person was engaged in humanitarian assistance in Syria. And he was named "governor", that is, Erdogan used the term used by the Sultan when he appointed his people to control the occupied lands of Syria. In the refugee camps, which are recognized by the international community and are located on the territory of Turkey, there are no refugees. These are military camps, from where raids are made to the territory of Syria. Therefore, neither diplomats, nor the press, nor other officials who submitted requests, do not give permission to visit these camps.

Now Turkey understands that the United States and Russia are about to announce the end of the game, so for several weeks now she has become engaged in outright looting in the northern regions of Syria. Brigade trucks arrive there that take out everything that can be carried out - for example, they dismantle machines and take out whole factories.

There are teams that specialize in works of art and archaeological plunder centers. In Antioch, even opened a huge antiques market, where you can openly buy items that appear in the catalogs as a national treasure of mankind. There is also a semi-legal Turkish-French company, based in Paris, where you can place an order for one or the other antiques. The order will be handed over to the Turkish army and she pack everything you need. The order is then delivered to Antioch, and from there flown to Paris to the customer.

Hopefully, we will never be able to make sure that this company is closely linked to the largest French antique gallery Fabius Freres, directly related to the aforementioned Laurent Fabius.

And whether we need all this climb? And if you climb, under what conditions?

“Russia doesn’t have to ask whether or not to get into the Syrian conflict, since it was planned against it,” the alliance of Western countries with Islamist groups was originally intended to weaken Russia.

Therefore, Russia has two paths. She can let Syria die, after which Qatar and Saudi Arabia will flood this country with Caucasian mercenaries, who will be sent from there to Russia. There is a second option - to deploy peacekeeping troops in Syria under the UN auspices to help the Syrians defeat international terrorism.

About Caucasian mercenaries, this is not speculation. The most accurate and detailed information on Syria can be found at «Kavkaz-tsentr», that is the official resource of Chechen militants. It is known that the Chechen rebels are actively fighting in Syria and there at the hands of Syrian and not the Russian military killed several Chechen field commanders. So the question can be resolved only through cooperation between the Russian army and the army of Syria.

Russia and Syria share many basic values. Only these two countries have been able to ensure the peaceful coexistence of people of different cultures and faiths. Once they got it, and only managed to untie it from the outside war.

If the Russian army were present in the combat zone, it would help the Syrian military to end the militants. After all, the Syrians do not need anything special, the situation is just asymmetric: the Syrian army is numerous and well armed, but it seems that it plays cat and mouse with a fragmented, mobile adversary who has full information from satellites about all the movements of the Syrian military, which creates a problem. The Russian army could help with information, it would equalize the conditions and lead to the rapid defeat of the militants. It is important that the Russian military, peacekeeping forces, which would act within the framework of the UN mandate, do not take any part in the hostilities against jihadists. Their contribution should consist only in the isolation of the territories, which would enable the Syrians to more effectively clean the area after the area.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.odnako.org/
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. svp67
    svp67 April 5 2013 07: 58 New
    +6
    The Russian army could help with information, it would equalize the conditions and lead to a quick defeat of militants



    And what or who prevents our country from doing this?
    1. ShturmKGB
      ShturmKGB April 5 2013 10: 02 New
      0
      East is a delicate matter...
    2. w.ebdo.g
      w.ebdo.g April 5 2013 11: 26 New
      +3
      It is told well, logically, but these are only the speculations of the speaker ...
      no one dedicated him to real plans, he just thinks so.

      I am not a specialist in big politics, so I can’t comment on anything of meaning.
      but for Syria and the fighting I’ll say:
      Of course, you should apply data from our satellites and inform the Syrians (apparently this is already happening).
      but operational information is also needed on the battlefield. It’s just how you can test our drones. let them give information and test in battle.
      as well as countermeasures against snipers that hit the optics and retina with a laser beam. the device was invented by our compatriot for about 5 years, but is not used anywhere, except for Chinese tanks))))))
      It is also a good idea to use mustard and soporific gas to smoke and immobilize militants barricaded in buildings and basements. This weapon is not lethal and UN authorized. no one will scream.
      it is much easier to fight with an adversary who reacts poorly, which he "cuts down" every minute)))
      From grenades, gas grenades in combination with mustard gas are thrown into the basement / building. he who has not lost consciousness will see nothing. and the eyes in battle are the most important ...

      conclusion:
      1. need drones
      2. apply mustard and sleep-releasing gases
      3. conduct a passive hunt for snipers using automatic devices.

      such tactics will lead to a quick victory.
      I think so.

      1. Geisenberg
        Geisenberg April 5 2013 11: 51 New
        +3
        A quick victory will result only in the quick destruction of militants and funding channels.
      2. w.ebdo.g
        w.ebdo.g April 5 2013 12: 03 New
        +8
        It would also be nice to use a seismic scanner to detect tunnels between buildings. the device is mass-produced and has no relation to military equipment. You can safely supply)))
        mobile samples weigh 10 kg, and those mounted on infantry fighting vehicles can also be industrial, they will show the whole area of ​​the city at a time and the cost of their (industrial) is not more than 2 million rubles.

        KROT-B
        TACTICAL AND TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS
        digging depth up to 3 m;
        The length of the blocked section is up to 100 m;
        detection of an intruder;
        the price is only 40 thousand tour.

        found a dig, installed a cumulative charge, detonated, threw gas grenades, installed 2 mines of MON 50 in both directions.
        Here is an algorithm of actions to block militants in a separate house / district.

        I think so.

      3. w.ebdo.g
        w.ebdo.g April 5 2013 13: 43 New
        +1
        why put a minus? and who? respond and explain your minus ...
      4. Nitup
        Nitup April 5 2013 23: 42 New
        +1
        there are also complexes that allow you to determine the exact coordinates of the shooter by the sound of a shot. It would be possible to deliver them, if not already delivered, of course.
    3. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg April 5 2013 11: 50 New
      0
      Big toad in the form of the UN and other NATO tinsel.
  2. Vanek
    Vanek April 5 2013 08: 01 New
    -1
    This region has colossal deposits of low-cost natural gas, which is why Russia, which has the ambition to control the global gas market, must be present there.

    Am I missing something somewhere? No?
  3. Reasonable, 2,3
    Reasonable, 2,3 April 5 2013 08: 18 New
    +2
    It’s an interesting article. You need to think about it. But Putin will go to a compromise. Gaddafi was enough for us.
  4. ATATA
    ATATA April 5 2013 08: 21 New
    23
    The article resembles a straightforward drawing of Russia into the conflict in Syria. Syria should support Russia in every way, but it is impossible to direct its military contingent.
    ps
    There is something to do with Britain. It may be some kind of flood, or tsunami, but it can no longer be tolerated.
    1. Chavy
      Chavy April 5 2013 09: 14 New
      +3
      First you need to deal with Russia's long-standing enemies - KSA and Qatar. These pseudo states have long been openly declaring their struggle with Russia. From them comes international Wahhabism, so these donors need to be put in place faster than England.
    2. alexng
      alexng April 5 2013 09: 16 New
      +3
      Britain is an abomination itself in all its manifestations and the most dirty country in the world. But I wonder what the Britons will do when the USA drops.
    3. seed
      seed April 5 2013 09: 31 New
      +2
      Quote: ATATA
      The article resembles a straightforward drawing of Russia into the conflict in Syria. Syria should support Russia in every way, but it is impossible to direct its military contingent.

      ps
      There is something to do with Britain. It may be some kind of flood, or tsunami, but it can no longer be tolerated.


      Right Do not succumb to provocations. Just not like before, they also did not succumb to provocations until 04h.00m. 22.06.41/XNUMX/XNUMX

      Mdya-ya, it is necessary to do shaw. How many hundreds of years are intriguing? Three hundred or more? There was a chance in 1940, but even there, he turned around redirecting Aloisych to the east.
      Maybe Muslims will help.

      Quote: “the media resource will work to wahhabize the Muslim population of France and thereby create an insoluble problem for French society. And the customers are, of course, the British.”

      They will not sit behind the English Channel. The Welsh and Anglic Muslims are brothers forever. It is necessary to help them strengthen ties up to the creation of the International. smile
    4. avt
      avt April 5 2013 09: 53 New
      +1
      Quote: ATATA
      The article resembles a straightforward drawing of Russia into the conflict in Syria. Syria should support Russia in every way, but it is impossible to direct its military contingent.

      Absolutely right! good That’s exactly what our “friend” says! -------- ,, Therefore, Russia has two ways. It can let Syria die, after which Qatar and Saudi Arabia will flood this country with Caucasian mercenaries, who will be sent to Russia from there. There is a second option - to deploy peacekeeping troops under the auspices of the UN in Syria to help Syrians defeat international terrorism. "------ The blue dream of the democrats, and even Russia, tied her hands with a“ peacekeeping status. "Here they are ,, observers "of the UN mission frolic worse than in Chechnya! And we will wash ourselves with the blood of our guys.
    5. baltika-18
      baltika-18 April 5 2013 10: 18 New
      +4
      Quote: ATATA
      The article resembles a straightforward drawing of Russia into the conflict in Syria.

      You’re right, Alexey. And given the personality of the author, they’re doubly right. Thierry Meyssan, journalist, conspiracy theorist, LGBT activist.
      Considering his previous works, in particular Monstrous Fraud (2003), it is safe to say that this subject is disingenuous in his statements. He pays great weight to Obama, although he knows that the US policy is not done by the president, but by financial circles (Washington District Columbia and the City of London are the two financial whales of the modern world).
      It’s not a secret to anyone that in the world behind the scenes there is an idea of ​​using Russia as “cannon fodder” to achieve certain goals. Mr. Thierry, without realizing it or understanding very well on the contrary, propagates this idea a little. Someone in the world is very strong we need a war, but not Russia, we do not need it at this stage of the development of civilization. hi
      1. ImPerts
        ImPerts April 5 2013 15: 08 New
        0
        There is always a third option. Meyssan deliberately kept silent about this. And the third option is now being implemented. Help Assad crush the opposition hydra in every possible way. But only the Syrians themselves, without the involvement of the UN or other "observers" should do this.
  5. treskoed
    treskoed April 5 2013 08: 34 New
    +5
    There can be no allies of Russia within the American system! Do not believe Danians bringing gifts!
    1. ziqzaq
      ziqzaq April 5 2013 08: 41 New
      +1
      Quote: treskoed

      There can be no allies of Russia within the American system! Do not believe Danians bringing gifts!

      That's right, we went to these scumbags, and Syria needs help with finances, weapons and food ...
    2. Strezhevchanin
      Strezhevchanin April 5 2013 18: 18 New
      0
      Quote: treskoed
      There can be no allies of Russia within the American system! Do not believe Danians bringing gifts!

      It is not paradoxical but true! They have been there for a long time, only they are not allowed to raise their heads. Remember at least the supposedly espionage scandals, people who have brains in America do not share the hostile-utopian positions of their elites.
  6. Atlon
    Atlon April 5 2013 09: 01 New
    +5
    The second article is for today, (the first one is here: http://topwar.ru/26387-eksperty-o-buduschem-yadernogo-oruzhiya.html), and again, the information that the US has started a navel after a “victory” over the USSR. And again, they offer us a trap ... I think that we need to build relations with China, and let the Amers dissolve the Middle East! Recently, Putin’s turn back to Europe and front to China has been very noticeable! Here are our "pale brothers" and were worried. Again, crisis, no money ... It’s getting more and more interesting! laughing
    1. Chavy
      Chavy April 5 2013 09: 20 New
      0
      They were so excited that they activated the puppet Juche of the DPRK, now any provocation on the part of the Americans will untie the DPRK’s hands, as well as China, which is harnessing according to the agreement for the DPRK, and China has already pulled its forces to the borders of S. Korea.
    2. Chavy
      Chavy April 5 2013 09: 23 New
      0
      They were so excited about the rapprochement between Russia and China that they activated the puppet Juche of the DPRK, now any provocation by the Americans will untie the hands of the DPRK, as well as China, which is harnessing under the agreement for the DPRK, and China has already pulled its forces to the borders of S. Korea.
  7. Averias
    Averias April 5 2013 09: 08 New
    +1
    The article is hmmm, strange and that is to say the least. I did not quite understand this: In Syria, there were fights around the Palestinian camp of Yarmouk. The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which defended the camp, was victorious. Something I did not quite understand. And what does Syria and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine have to do with it? The statement that Russia wants to become a gas monopolist is also not entirely clear. It is certainly good, who would not dream? But only now to force us to gallop to the Middle East is doubtful. And the conversation about the Caucasian fighters and the more so the reference to the "Kavkaz Center" - these are the ones on, get the tractor village. Yes, and it looks like: Like, look, no one sees, but I went to the Kavkaz Center website and immediately recognized everything. It looks ridiculous. The fact that the militants from the Caucasus and not only how jackals run around the entire Middle East - and a hedgehog is understandable. They who - yes nobody, meat, they know how to do that? Only kill from around the corner, rob, and then when they are many times more. And the "fathers commanders" of them, have long fled to Europe, from there they rule and distribute the money. Only here is the distribution, as in the film "The Wedding in the Robin" goes according to the principle - This is tetbe, this is also tebe and this is tebe, well, and that’s how I should be laughing And the conversation that inside the USA has our allies is nonsense, there are those who are not happy with what is happening in the USA now. Those who did not get a place at the trough. That speculate on the Russian-American confrontation.
  8. Belogor
    Belogor April 5 2013 09: 10 New
    0
    Of course,
    in order to bring an imbalance in relations between the Russian Federation and the PRC, a lot of things can be promised and written, but Russia, I hope I have already understood the taste of friendship with the West and how it all turns out.
  9. penguin
    penguin April 5 2013 09: 31 New
    +1
    Do they want to see if you spend less money on ensuring the security of Israel. We have them up to x .... or what? Soyuznik apparently became a burden, we decided to adjust.
  10. SPIRITofFREEDOM
    SPIRITofFREEDOM April 5 2013 09: 31 New
    +1
    We would all live together long ago our solar system populated
  11. LaGlobal
    LaGlobal April 5 2013 09: 43 New
    +1
    Good morning, forum users! The article is excellent! I read it in one go. Everything is detailed and lucidly painted on the situation that has developed in the Middle East. I can conclude that most likely it will be:
    - deploy peacekeeping forces under the auspices of the United Nations in Syria to help Syrians defeat international terrorism


    и

    And what will happen to the Gulf?

    - Now everyone is preparing for the rapid collapse of Saudi Arabia. The king is seriously ill and is no longer able to rule the country. He no longer even understands that he is the head of state. The clan of the now ruling Saudis is the most reactionary of all the branches of the ruling family. Of course, the Saudis will try to seize power after the death of King Abdullah, although it will be illegitimate. At the same time, the entire population of the country, divided into groups, has long been ready for an open uprising and is waiting only for the death of the king - in a word, the continuity of power will be impeded.
  12. amp
    amp April 5 2013 11: 04 New
    +1
    The biggest thing that Russia can promise the United States is neutrality regarding its confrontation with China. No alliances with the USA. Especially against China.
  13. pav-pon1972
    pav-pon1972 April 5 2013 11: 07 New
    +1
    After all, Qatar is not quite a state, it is rather an enterprise, and not an autonomous one. Qatar is the "daughter" of a large concern - BG Group. That is, it is the governing body of the British oil company, in whose territory is the largest US military base

    Gazprom needs to adopt such tactics of developing wells outside of Russia ...
    1. silver_roman
      silver_roman April 5 2013 11: 24 New
      0
      Already tried to take the bowels of Cyprus, but then the Turks foam went from the mouth!
      In general, there are views that corporations will rule in the future, and not governments. But this is a subjective opinion and also not mine. The article was in a similar fashion!
  14. silver_roman
    silver_roman April 5 2013 11: 13 New
    +1
    yeah .... interesting article. if we take everything written above as a fact, then a picture emerges when all the "unions on paper" are worthless. England wants to shake France, while both states are part of the Euro zone. Arabia also sleeps and sees how to overthrow the "leader", the king at death, Turkey - a typical "Ottoman", which smashed Byzantium with its raids. Now, in essence, it is doing the same in Syria .. meanly and consistently.

    A very sensible idea is also expressed here regarding the information of the Syrian army. As long as we don’t help OPEN (!) Militarily, I hope that we’ll clarify the situation with information from satellites. It goes without saying that the BDK does not just swim there every week.

    All this is so exciting. Shadow Games ... Opposing Interests - A BIG GAME.
    By the way, recently, I figured it like this: no one ever (when small arms and cannon weapons appeared) fought openly. Not counting, of course, the Second World War. All subsequent conflicts occurred in a "guerrilla rhythm", due to the bribery of the tops, sponsorship of radical groups. I mean, first of all, you need to prepare for this, because if our ENEMY does not dare even openly attack Syria, then all the more there will be no open confrontation with the Russian Federation.

    Once I read, and later I admired (if the article was true) that the special services of the Russian Federation (GRU, FSB, etc.) consistently discovered and destroyed the former militant leaders who led the gangs in Chechnya. Taki special. operations were carried out in Turkey. There, it seems, even Interpol tried to track down, but without success. We even went onto the trail on one of ours, as a result, we found only a modular rifle complex thunder and ALL request .
    Of course I don’t know about the veracity of the article, but according to its data, STUK 5 failed the leaders. So our purges are also carried out and never forget about our enemies!
    1. amp
      amp April 5 2013 12: 12 New
      +1
      England is not included in the euro zone.
      The British pound is one of the main competitors of the euro.
      1. silver_roman
        silver_roman April 5 2013 13: 12 New
        0
        yes, wrong. The European Union had in mind!
        The eurozone is probably the more economic component with a single currency - the euro!
  15. Vtel
    Vtel April 5 2013 11: 40 New
    +7
    Million Israelis come from the USA, but the second million come from the former USSR
    “To expel from the central provinces all Jewish winemakers ... in order to prevent the excessive reproduction in Russia of these people who are more harmful than useful to the state” - Alexander I. They like to stir up water everywhere.
  16. fellow misha
    fellow misha April 5 2013 11: 44 New
    +2
    Lord Why did you drown Atlantis instead of foggy Albion! "Imagine how life on planet Earth would now be arranged without this world-class adder!
    1. sincman
      sincman April 5 2013 14: 55 New
      +2
      Quote: comrade misha
      Lord Why did you drown Atlantis instead of foggy Albion!

      Actually Atlantis was drowned for the same reasons that you now want to drown foggy Albion ...;))) So their turn has not come up yet ... But I think this time they will not be drowned, but frozen ...
  17. washi
    washi April 5 2013 15: 42 New
    0
    So far, the most promising is the idea of ​​joint control of the United States and Russia in the region. To do this, you first need to make peace in Syria, while maintaining Bashar al-Assad in power, because without him no peace in Syria is possible in principle. The question may arise about the annexation of part of the territory of Syria. We are talking about the north of the country, the lands that may have to be transferred to Turkey as payment for its participation in the war, because Turkey is needed by the United States.
    Bummer. On the contrary. Turkey is a state - an aggressor.
    I agree to create a Kurdish state. In this case, you need to bite off Turkey a bit.
    And the city of Ararat will finally become part of Armenia.
  18. CAMS
    CAMS April 8 2013 12: 53 New
    0
    Vasya, what are you talking about
    dialogue usa russia began the game of muscles with amers they are more of them they shake but it is necessary to show their own and here are the exercises in the Crimea