The Arctic Seven Goes on the Offensive
NATO's "Blind Spot"
In the West, voices are increasingly being heard about the need to shift NATO's focus to the Arctic. Translated from diplomatic to layman's terms, this means the occupation of a frosty region that was once considered an uninhabitable reserve for humans. The first signs that the calls have had an effect are already obvious. Trump has started an unprecedented economic war with Canada and Europe. It may be shooting at areas, but the goals are quite clear - to force the northern neighbor to submit and get Greenland under jurisdiction. This will automatically expand the influence of the United States in the Arctic. It will allow it to lay claim to the minerals hidden in the northern shelf.
The green agenda remains green, but no one is going to give up oil and gas. Geologists have only made a preliminary assessment of the resource deposits, but they are impressive. Up to a third of the world's natural gas reserves and about 13 percent of oil can be extracted from under the Arctic ice crust. However, why complicate your life? It is enough to wait a little, and the ice will retreat on its own.
Global warming is especially merciless to the Arctic region – average temperatures here are growing faster than in other regions of the Earth. The Russian authorities first came to understand this back in the 90s, but there were no resources for the full-fledged development of the Arctic.
In the early 2000s, Russia demarcated the Arctic shelf, where the territory under its control extends much further than the 200-mile zone from the shore. No one expected that the West would accept this point of view of the Kremlin, and it was not important. Although there is a very specific clause in international law regulating the possibility of recognizing the water area beyond the 200-mile zone if it is proven that the shelf lining the bottom belongs to the continental plate.
The next step was to deploy transport infrastructure, develop natural resources and protect the Arctic territory. For all those who are slow-witted: in 2007, two bathyscaphes installed a flagpole with the Russian flag at a depth of about four kilometers. Right in the area of the North Pole. To put it mildly, this infuriated our former partners. Firstly, because Russia allowed itself to do this. And secondly, because the West is now playing catch-up.
The Russian naval bases in the Arctic Ocean pose a particular danger to the enemy. The authors of the current call-to-action report “In the North: Countering the Impact of Arctic Insecurity on the United States and NATO” are sounding the alarm under the impression of the “militarization” of the Northern Sea Route. This route is almost entirely under the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation, which does not give Brussels and Washington any peace. So far, the annual growth of transportation on this highway is not impressive and even lags behind the designated schedule, but the time of the northern route has simply not come yet. As soon as navigation along the route becomes available all year round and without icebreaker escort, half the world will be drawn to the Russian north. Because it will be cheaper and easier.
The Northwest Route, which runs along the Canadian coast on the other side of the Arctic, is incomparable to the Northern Sea Route. It is more complicated in terms of logistics, longer, and has poor infrastructure. The Americans, for example, have only a couple of icebreakers: Polar Star and Healy. While the first can be conditionally called an analogue of Russian heavy icebreakers, the second is a medium-class icebreaker and is only suitable for difficult ice conditions.
For comparison, Russia has 40 icebreakers, seven of which are heavy. To fully control the northern region, the Americans have two options: either wait until the ice melts, or urgently build an icebreaker. fleet adequate numbers. Of course, neither will happen quickly. Of the known programs to strengthen the icebreaker fleet, the Polar Security Cutter for the US Coast Guard and the upcoming Arctic Security Cutter can be singled out. This was one of the reasons why the Arctic region in the West began to be called NATO's "blind spot".
The enemy is making plans
All of the above cannot but be realized in European and American think tanks. The enemy did not start taking measures yesterday or the day before yesterday. Exercises are held on a regular basis, the official goal of which is to confront Russia. But they are conducted in a very peculiar way. Last year, three large-scale maneuvers took place within a few weeks of each other - US NORTHCOM's Arctic Edge, Canada's Operation Nanook and NATO's Cold/Nordic Response exercises. Ideally, they should have taken place at the same time with close coordination of efforts. Western observers complain about the disunity of Western countries' efforts in the Arctic region. But the enemy learns from mistakes, even if they are their own.
In line with the strengthening of influence on Moscow, Sweden and Finland were accepted into the North Atlantic Alliance. The circle is closed – now all countries of the “Arctic Seven” (USA, Canada, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Iceland) are part of NATO. The most interesting thing is that the United States, until recently, did not particularly invest in the occupation of the Arctic region. Not because of reluctance, but because of a banal lack of resources. Donald Trump’s current policy can be seen as an attempt to compensate for the lag. It is not for nothing that Europe is being transferred to the rails of self-sufficiency – the freed up resources will go precisely to the Arctic region.
As a result, the White House faces only two global problems: containing China in Southeast Asia and Russia in the Arctic. Apparently, the Americans simply do not have enough strength for the rest of the globe. But while Washington is getting ready, individual members of the “Arctic Seven” are taking the initiative into their own hands.
At the end of last year, the Swedes, Norwegians and Finns were concerned about creating a joint command, JFC Norfolk. Its main goal is to create protected routes for the alliance's logistics in the conditions of the Far North. If the enemy succeeds, the experience of JFC Norfolk will be scaled up for the entire "seven". Everything looks good, if not for one "but". We are talking about Donald Trump again, or rather, about his desire to privatize Greenland. It is possible that by military means. And no one will be able to do anything - the right of the strong is respected in the West.
But the consequences of such a step are not difficult to guess. There can be no talk of any trust within the NATO bloc from now on. Who will be ready to spend money on offerings to the overlord if the master does not fulfill his promises? Today you increase military deductions for him to the desired 5 percent of GDP, and tomorrow he takes away your territories. The death of the "brain of NATO", which Macron spoke about even before the special military operation, will enter an irreversible phase. However, Trump can again pretend to be Biden and not remember his theses about both Greenland and Canada. He already demonstrated something similar when he "forgot" that he called Zelensky a tyrant.
On the one hand, America's moves in the direction of the Arctic seem logical, but on the other, they are insufficient. The 11th Airborne Division has been deployed in Alaska – perhaps the best-suited unit for northern conditions. F-35s have been added to local airfields. But the Europeans want more. First of all, the deployment of an American contingent on NATO's northern borders. In other words, Brussels is once again trying to shift the burden of security control onto the shoulders of Big Brother.
An unexpected, although quite logical conclusion of the authors of “In the North: Countering the Consequences of Arctic Insecurity for the United States and NATO” is the thesis about the inevitable rapprochement with Russia. Of course, no one is going to include Russia in the council of seven circumpolar countries yet, but the level of threats from disunity will invariably grow. In the thawing North of the planet there will be more ships, ports, and other civilian and military infrastructure – all this increases the risks of a clash between NATO and Russian forces.
It would seem that the decrease in the salinity of sea waters in the Arctic as a result of global warming is a trivial thing, but it can lead to malfunctions in the submarines' hydroacoustic systems. The equipment will have to be reconfigured in order to avoid dangerous excesses. In the meantime, analysts from the enemy side list the dangers that Russia creates in the Arctic. Dangers for the enemy side, of course. They reproach it for expanding naval activity near NATO naval bases in northern Europe. If this is true, then the event is completely fair and ordinary.
We are concerned about unfriendly countries and the constant overflights of Russian military aircraft. aviation Arctic waters. And again – that’s how it should be. Sometimes the enemy even stoops to fakes. They accused Russia of jamming (spoofing) satellite navigation in the areas where those very Arctic exercises were being held. They say that this is very inconvenient and creates critical interference for civil aviation. Let’s imagine for a minute that this is true, and answer the question: what are civil aircraft doing in the area where military exercises are being held? But that’s not all. It turns out that NATO doesn’t like the too late notification of training launches by cruise and ballistic missiles rockets. We will leave this without any comment at all. As well as the groundless attempts to accuse Russia of disrupting underwater communications in northern Europe.
Such attacks indicate one thing: Russia has a certain head start over NATO in developing the Arctic. For now, there is a head start. The most important thing now is to prevent the enemy from compensating for the lag, otherwise the northern lands may well become a battlefield of global significance.
Information