The game and the death of Boris Berezovsky
This article is written solely on the basis of unverified conjectures.The death of Boris Berezovsky still leaves many questions. Answers to which either appear little by little, strictly dosed, or do not appear at all. Here are the main ones.
Why, immediately after Berezovsky’s death, did the investigation start to persist in talking about suicide, and after a while they started talking about the possibility of outside “help”?
Why didn’t anyone say from the very beginning that the deceased (or killed) B. had died from hanging?
Why did the British forensic scientists "did not notice" on Berezovsky’s neck a thread about which nothing was said at first, but only a few days later?
Why do these “independent British experts” do for more than a week what any university student should do in a couple of hours?
Why did it appear only on the fifth day after B.'s death that he had a broken rib, without any explanation of whether this was a lifetime injury? Although the definition of intravital injury - the simplest task for the pathologist.
Why only a week after his death "suddenly" it turned out that B. had no problems with money, and he was going to get a huge amount?
And the most important question: why did Berezovsky have to settle accounts with life? None of B.'s close friends, by the way, believed in his suicide.
And he didn’t have to settle accounts with life. He was going to live. And to continue playing those games that have been played in the past decades - political games.
The first thing you need to understand - Boris Berezovsky was engaged in anti-Russian activities. That is if to say the least. To put it bluntly - he betrayed his homeland and came into contact with influential circles in the UK. And this happened long before his emigration to London. He became first a traitor and only then an emigrant. While in Russia, Berezovsky defended the interests not of Russia, but of Britain.
Then he had to leave. Of course, London did not give him to Russia. By the way - there has never been any court that would have considered the merits of the evidence of Russia demanding the extradition of Berezovsky. The Minister of Internal Affairs of Britain, CAM, decided to give him political asylum, and then the court, on the basis of this decision, decided to refuse extradition, not even CONSIDERING the evidence of BAB’s guilt.
In Britain, Berezovsky fought hard against Russia. And not only within Russia itself, but also abroad. Only one example - he, or rather, by the order of his curators from the Mi-6, he helped with money "orange leaders" in Ukraine. It's comfortable. Whose money? Berezovsky. No special services, no foreign trace.
So Berezovsky fought against Russia and personally Vladimir Putin. On his account the organization of many deaths and provocations. The loudest - the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko.
Berezovsky’s last chronological attempt to justify the confidence of his curators is “white ribbons”. This is an attempt of the orange-white revolution when, while sitting in London, he called for the overthrow of the legitimate authority in Russia. This funding and coordination of the Fifth Column in our country.
Nothing succeeded. Revolution did not work. But the development has received a completely different story.
Two words should be said here, but why are Berezovsky and revolutions necessary? They are needed to weaken geopolitical rivals - this is at least. Maximum for the establishment in other countries of such governments, which will give the resources of their countries into the hands of Anglo-Saxon corporations. (The last and most vivid example of this is Libya. There, the “Berezovsky” won and gave away Libyan oil to the Americans and the British.)
The UK's main corporation is British Petroleum (BP). It plays the same role that the East India Company once played in politics and the economy of Britain. One of the main tasks is to take control of the resources of other countries. That is why BP has been so active in Russia, having achieved the creation of TNK-BP company in our company. A vivid example of the fact that it is important for London to be in the market, and not earnings, is the stubborn unwillingness of the British part of TNK-BP shareholders to extract oil anywhere other than Russia. Even if in Russia the cost is higher and earnings are lower.
The Russian government led a long and stubborn company to squeeze the British and Russian oil industry. All this ended with a compromise between the Kremlin and London. The British sell Rosneft their stake in TNK-BP and the state-owned company Rosneft restores state control over another piece of our oil pie. At the same time, it also becomes the world's largest oil company. The British get a stake in Rosneft (not controlling). This situation suits both parties. For Russia, it is important to regain control over our wealth, and for the British, in a difficult crisis moment, we must maintain our presence in the oil sector of Russia. Let it be so on the side. The crisis will pass, the situation will change and our British "friends" will again try to replay the situation in their favor.
But so far a compromise has been found. One of the conditions is that the British will drastically reduce support for the Fifth Column in Russia and abroad, “ask” it to become “quiet and calm.” So - geopolitics pulled the economy.
And now the question? What do the owners do with those revolutionaries who are no longer needed? There are only two options. Bad - kill, to get an information about the reason for hitting the enemy. And to get the banner. The “bloody regime” killed our all, unforgettable. The second option is better for retired "freedom fighters" - a pension. Work "shop window" for new revolutionaries. You see how he is doing well and you will have it if you start cooperating with us.
Faces of the London "freedom fighters" seen last week? They are scared and surprised. How would the friends of Trotsky or Parvus be surprised if they were told that these leaders had hanged themselves, because they had no money. Trotsky can not hang himself. Not the caliber, not the hardening. This is a player. And Berezovsky was a player. And therefore his friends are absolutely right: Boris Abramovich could not hang himself. And that means - he was killed. Just who?
There are only two options: the “bloody regime” of Russia or British friends. Pay attention - nobody speaks about the guilt of the Kremlin. Because there is a letter to Berezovsky personally to Putin. And it means there is no need to kill Berezovsky, who asks for forgiveness and asks for permission to return.
What are the options? Only one.
Berezovsky was killed by his curators from the British special services.
Why and why? This is where we use information from absolutely unverified conjectures.
The British decided to send Berezovsky to retire. Work the very "shop window". The call to him about this was - the loss of the court to Abramovich. There would be a Bab and calm down. Gradually retire. He did. Alexander Goldfarb, one of Berezovsky’s confidants, who invented and promoted a false story with polonium, with a dose that in reality could have poisoned the floor of London, and not just Litvinenko, said the other day that B. had stopped funding his projects and had gone into the shadow for several months.
But Berezovsky was a player. And he did not want to retire. Although the British made an excellent legend to him - the loss of the court to Abramovich - frustration + financial difficulties - going into the shadows - a calm old age.
Berezovsky did not want to retire. And he decided to do something to show his relevance and importance. To be returned to the ring.
This was his main and fatal mistake. Like many revolutionaries, Berezovsky decided that the owner loved him. This is not true.
The owner loves not the calf, the owner loves veal.
For the British, the Berezovsky project was closed completely and irrevocably. And was part of an agreement with the Kremlin, which allowed the British to remain in the oil field of Russia. And here Berezovsky decided to act without asking permission. As if having gone from business, he wrote a letter to Putin, which is now being talked about so much.
The meaning of the act of Berezovsky was as follows. Under the guise of remorse and a request to Putin to allow Berezovsky to return on the basis of certain actions (exposing his past attacks on Russia + participating in the information strike on the Fifth Column + surrendering agents and accounts), he actually wanted something completely different. There was no remorse. By his letter, Berezovsky wanted to substitute Putin for an informational blow.
Berezovsky is ostensibly ready to return and surrender everything and everyone, but he needs guarantees of amnesty and forgiveness. Therefore, as an advance, he asks Putin personally to say (do) something that would give Berezovsky confidence in the Kremlin’s willingness to act honestly with him. For example, one of the criminal cases against B. is being closed due to newly discovered circumstances, and this is, as it were, by chance, the president of Russia comments.
After that, Berezovsky uses what happened not for a return, but for a new information attack on Russia. Representing a change in the position of Russian justice, not only as evidence of the innocence of Berezovsky himself, but also of the innocence of ALL who fled to London. The second wave of information attack was supposed to consist in a “statement of fact” - the power in Russia is very weak. Once at this level, Russia recognizes the fact of the “illegality” of the persecution of Berezovsky.
Berezovsky was going to present all this to the English "on a silver platter", as evidence of his professional suitability. He was able to substitute Putin, he retired early.
Berezovsky told the whole of his plan to his British contactees ALREADY AFTER the beginning of his incarnation. He first came into contact with the Kremlin and only after that he told his “British friends”. B. did not say only about one thing - about the details. Namely, about what he personally wrote and ALREADY delivered Putin a letter.
And so signed a death warrant. It became clear to the British that Berezovsky was out of control, that he could not and did not want to sit quietly in retirement. But it's not so bad. After all, in fact, his “initiative” violated agreements with Moscow and destroyed all British geopolitical policies in the post-Soviet space. Because, make Berezovsky his plan - and no one will believe that the BAB is acting on a personal initiative. So this situation will cancel all the arrangements.
This can not be allowed. What remains? So only one thing remains - to make Berezovsky a banner. Kill and pass his death for the massacre of the Kremlin over inflexible fighter. After all, the impossibility of swearing and accusing Russia because of his death was not part of the “package agreement”.
And the British killed Berezovsky. After that, the story about the “trace of the Kremlin” was supposed to start. And then the British were in for an unpleasant surprise, which completely spoiled their game. In the very first hours after Berezovsky’s death was reported, Putin’s press secretary, Dmitry Peskov, spoke about the oligarch’s letter to the Russian president. (http://lenta.ru/news/2013/03/31/ebowtheletter/) Please note - not according to unverified data, not from the words "source in the Kremlin", but in fact - according to the words of the PRESIDENT OF RUSSIA. After this, it is impossible to promote the topic of murder on the orders of the Kremlin. There is an urgent need to change tactics for suicide.
What to do? After all, all the preparation was done for the murder version.
From here comes the mysterious actions of the “experts” who can’t really carry out an autopsy. The ribs were broken for murder. And now the version has changed radically. Complicated.
Most likely, we now see some notion, impromptu. Someone will be appointed "guilty", will be sought. A new version will appear, which will explain who could have killed Berezovsky without being in any way connected with Moscow or London. Love or money, or all together.
And another thing that matters is that Putin did not believe Berezovsky. And spent a brilliant combination. After all, not only Berezovsky needs proof of the seriousness of the Kremlin’s intentions, but the Kremlin also needs the same proof. And - go ahead. After all, the initiator of the contact is Berezovsky, and he is the first to start proving the seriousness of intentions. The first proof is the letter itself, written by Berezovsky’s hand, which he wrote. But to this letter "attached" and a certain portion of classified information. Accounts, names, intentions. So that in the near future it is worth waiting in Russia for the revocation of licenses from some banks, the departure of several foreign businessmen from the country. Quiet, calm, without fanfare.
My comment:
He is for the traitors of the motherland. Berezovsky’s example is clear. By taking the path of betrayal, man, in fact, falls into slavery. His freedom of choice is reduced to zero. Especially after emigration. It does not matter what role you assigned to the owners. "Independent Journalist" or oligarch. You can only what they allow. Any autonomy is strictly suppressed. Berezovsky showed it - Berezovsky was killed. This is nothing new. It always happens. The slave does not know the master's intentions — he is his blind weapon. And only in this quality and need.
Therefore, the choice is actually such. Taking the path of betrayal of their country, traitors fall into slavery. Freedom is only for those fighting for their country. To fight for someone else is slavery.
Traitors always end up badly.
The owner loves not the calf, the owner loves veal.
Information