Iranian 'cartoons': Tehran shows how it will destroy the US Navy base Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean with its weapons

13 678 28
Iranian 'cartoons': Tehran shows how it will destroy the US Navy base Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean with its weapons

Iranian propaganda has released another epic video, which simulates a strike on a US Navy auxiliary base in the Indian Ocean, where the Americans are actively transferring their Aviation.

The IRGC command is well aware of the latter's location, as shown in the animated video. High-ranking Iranian military personnel examine the aforementioned island on a map and ultimately decide to mark it missile hit.



It then shows dozens of Khorramshahr-4 ballistic missiles taking off and heading towards their target. In turn, the American systems Defense, located on the island of Diego Garcia, fire furiously at enemy targets, but are unable to hit them.

As a result, the missiles reach their intended target, and a “nuclear mushroom cloud” forms over the island.

The video ends with US President Donald Trump learning about what happened and clutching his head in despair.

It is worth noting that the video looks quite epic. But in reality, things are much more prosaic.

The whole point is that the so-called “axis of resistance,” which was the main factor of Iran’s influence in the Middle East, has been practically destroyed. The US and its allies are now amassing bombers to begin “razing” the Islamic Republic to the ground if its authorities do not sign the nuclear deal.

Given Donald Trump's impulsive nature, there is no doubt that his threats to Tehran are not empty words. He will give the order to use force.

The only question is what Iran is going to do? After all, cartoons with “super missiles” are clearly not enough to win the brewing conflict. On the other hand, if everything were so simple for the US and Israel, they would have already turned Iran into ruins, as they know how.

28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    April 7 2025 17: 18
    In fact, if the Americans wanted to, they would smash Iran to smithereens - from the air. But there would be big problems with a ground operation, and the Americans are unlikely to be able to do it.
    1. -2
      April 7 2025 17: 31
      Not a fact! Only if they use nuclear weapons or tactical nuclear weapons. They simply don't have enough weapons, and there will be damage, but not critical. If they use their conventional weapons totally, they will become defenseless against us and China. Replenishment of stocks, to put it mildly, lags far behind expenditure in a modern war.
      1. 0
        April 7 2025 17: 49
        Quote: neri73-r
        They simply won’t have enough weapons, and there will be damage, but not critical.

        They have enough of everything. It doesn't take much to destroy Iran's Air Force and Air Defense, and then they'll just bring in a B-52 and polish it with carpet bombing. Cast iron is quite effective in such cases. We'll just have to console ourselves with fairy tales that Ukraine's Air Defense in 2022 was, of course, much, much more powerful than Iran's.
        1. +1
          April 7 2025 18: 17
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          They have enough of everything.
          They themselves later admitted that in Yugoslavia they were on the brink precisely because of the lack of means of attack! And if the Yugoslavs had dug in their heels, it could have been a bummer, they would have had to either retreat or bring in an army, and that would have been a completely different war.
          1. +2
            April 7 2025 18: 47
            Quote: neri73-r
            They themselves later admitted that in Yugoslavia they were on the brink precisely because of the lack of means of attack!

            Please clarify who complained and when. And where did you get this information?
      2. -1
        April 7 2025 17: 55
        Quote: neri73-r
        Not a fact! Only if nuclear weapons or tactical nuclear weapons are used.

        The second time and against a country that officially does not have it?
        But won’t this free up the hands of the Russian Armed Forces to use tactical nuclear weapons against Russia’s enemies, or are our hands tied by the absence of war, and the SVO does not provide for anything other than a slingshot?
        * * *
        Frankly speaking, I want to finish all this action as soon as possible. Only the plans are being developed in Moscow, and we have to wait...
        1. 0
          April 10 2025 16: 46
          Quote: yuriy55
          The second time and against a country that officially does not have it?

          In fact, Israel can use nuclear weapons, and it will be more convenient for both the US and Israel, which will declare itself a nuclear power. They can do this after Iran launches a retaliatory missile strike on their territory.
      3. -2
        April 7 2025 21: 57
        There are no special preparations for a strike on Iran. The US is not creating a large group of forces near Iran.
        Hence the conclusion: Trump is going to use nuclear weapons against Iran, several charges with a minimum power (8 kt), this will wipe out some super important targets and disorganize Iran, and the US knows what to do with the ashes, they will send some ISIS there and let them cut each other's throats.
        1. 0
          April 10 2025 16: 55
          Quote: Eroma
          Hence the conclusion: Trump is going to use nuclear weapons against Iran, several charges with a minimum power (8 kt)

          Why does Trump need this? It will immediately complicate everything for him. But if Israel strikes... "well, that's a completely different matter." Let's say after Iran's retaliatory missile strike on Israel. Israel will immediately and officially declare itself a nuclear power, justify its strike as self-defense, the US will throw up its hands and withdraw its bases in the region, and oil prices will meanwhile break all records. Because Iran will close Hormuz.
          This way all goals will be achieved.
          But Israel will still have to fight Iran, the US will only insure and add.
          I think it will be something like this.
          1. 0
            April 10 2025 23: 08
            Welcome hi
            Quote: bayard
            Why does Trump need this?

            Who knows why he's picking on Iran? He withdrew from the nuclear deal, now he's forcing them to sign a nuclear deal! wassat Trump's behavior towards Iran is like the behavior of a thug who wants to punch a passerby in the face, but to just punch him is not a dude, so he clings to words and everything in a row, looking for a reason! am and why does he need it, no one knows, maybe he wants to please a girl, maybe he wants to raise his authority in someone's eyes! That's how Trump behaves, for him Iran is like an element of his PR company: Trump is omnipotent! In fact, Iran can't do anything to the US, and it has the image of a bad guy, there is an opportunity to earn the glory of a Superhero for free, that's why Trump is clinging to Iran bully
            His promises of a Super bombing, like after Desert Storm, the existing forces do not reach the level of Super forces, which means that if Trump has to carry out this super strike, then the US has nothing but nuclear weapons as a Super weapon!
            And who will rise up against the US for low-power nuclear strikes? No one! Everyone will only get even more nervous, lest they get hit with 8 Kt too. bully
            1. 0
              April 11 2025 02: 02
              Have you seen the joint interview between Trump and Netanyahu? Pay attention to Netanyahu's body language during Trump's speech. And it will immediately become clear what Trump wants and what he doesn't want, but what Netanyahu is forced to accept. And note - the 17% tariff was not lifted from Israel wink they say "we already provide them with huge assistance of $3 billion a year". Therefore, Trump can insure Israel, but... "itself, itself, itself". And Trump has already said that direct negotiations with Iran will begin in the coming days. Why is Iran so stubbornly evading this... Why? After all, Trump proposed Russia as a mediator and guarantor. Yes Yes Yes . bully But for some reason Iran stubbornly refuses this.
              I know why, but for now let's wait for the consequences. Will Iran decide to get out from under the British ass and go under the "umbrella" of Russia (this is Trump's proposal, by the way) request science does not yet know.
              But if Iran starts to kick up a fuss and be cheeky... it will be more or less as I described.
              Trump doesn't need Gulf oil anymore, he has plenty of his own. And he will buy heavy oil from Venezuela (if an agreement is reached) or from Russia. Moreover, he will buy our fuel oil, mix it with his light oil and produce diesel fuel. This was the case before the NWO, and it can happen again, because Trump needs a lot of diesel fuel. And the Gulf has light oil. If a war breaks out there, WHO will suffer? wink Europe and China. And partly India. And this is just great for Trump. Expensive oil - high export revenues, shrinking economies of Europe, China and India... And growth of the US economy. fellow
              And our economy. What is right and fair.
              Let Israel bomb, that's what it needs. Trump will throw bombs, provide insurance, and act as a mediator after the regional Armageddon. Most likely together with Russia. A peacemaker! He will say, "But I immediately offered to negotiate, but you didn't even want Russia as a mediator and guarantor."
              And we will not abandon China and India (as well as Japan and South Korea) in trouble - we will provide them with oil and LNG. Together with Venezuela. When oil is at $200, how can we not help our partners? And Venezuela will immediately cheer up at such prices, increase volumes, uncork light oil fields (they were shy before), and we can renew the bitumen technology from the same USA. We can even stir up a three-party cosortium - Russia as a guarantor, the USA as the owner of the technology, gas condensate on a short leg and a guaranteed sales market right next door. If you don’t make a mess, then it’s quite possible to come to an agreement. And if not, then we can transport gas condensate from our northern fields to pump into the wells of bitumen fields and increase the output. If the price is $150-200, then any whim and logistics will pay off. And we will be able to increase exports without OPEC. But for this we will have to be appeased. Honestly and without perversion. By lifting all sanctions and restrictions.
              And how many kilotons will fly from Israel to the Persians, and how many they will receive back, these are already their old Middle Eastern showdowns.
    2. 0
      April 7 2025 18: 00
      There is such a term "Unacceptable losses" Dolbalka can refuse
      1. 0
        April 7 2025 18: 42
        The Houthis are far from Iran, and even the Americans admit the lack of prospects for conducting full-scale military operations against them, Iran has been preparing for many years for a confrontation with Israel, and later with the US, and they really have something to respond with. And pro-Iranian proxies all over the world...
    3. +1
      April 8 2025 15: 44
      If they were confident in their impunity, they would have been "torn apart" long ago, as has happened more than once in other countries, I won't give examples. But here they only shake their fists and make scary faces.
    4. 0
      April 8 2025 23: 42
      What's the problem? At most, small urban battles, like those in the second campaign against Iraq, and the Iranian regime has many enemies inside. Iran's proxies are being systematically eliminated by Israel and the US. Moreover, the Iranian leadership has agreed to direct negotiations.
  2. +2
    April 7 2025 17: 21
    Given Donald Trump's impulsive nature, there is no doubt that his threats to Tehran are not empty words. He will give the order to use force.

    the same thing happened with S. Korea, there was enough impulsiveness... Let's see, why guess...
    1. +4
      April 7 2025 17: 33
      Quote: Lemon
      it was the same with S. Korea, there was enough impulsiveness...

      what was enough?!
      With North Korea, nothing happened except bubbles in a puddle
  3. +1
    April 7 2025 17: 23
    Yes, I remembered. The North Koreans also made some pretty good cartoons with American AUGs. In the end, the Americans went home.
  4. +3
    April 7 2025 17: 55
    As always, they'll shit themselves, and all the steam will go down the drain. Iraq is an example for you.
    1. +2
      April 8 2025 08: 35
      Well, I don't know, in Iraq the Americans rolled over Saddam's troops without any problems
  5. 0
    April 7 2025 17: 59
    Rockets are of course good and powerful. But migrants in America are also powerful weapons, especially suicide bombers.
  6. +1
    April 7 2025 18: 03
    The Iranian leadership wants peace too much and is too toothless. They have the means, but they lack the courage. After all, the Americans will forbid the Indians and Chinese from buying Iranian oil, and the already dying economy will begin to resemble the Syrian one.
  7. -3
    April 7 2025 18: 14
    On the other hand, if everything were so simple for the US and Israel, they would have already turned Iran into ruins, as they know how.

    I don't think they hit. First they do it, then they talk in the media.
    What will be the price of oil after the strikes? And if Russia and the Saudis reduce production?
  8. 0
    April 7 2025 23: 22
    I remembered something

    To destroy a tank company (causing losses of over 50%) attacking on a front of approximately one kilometer, it will be necessary nuclear ammunition with a capacity of at least 10 kt (the radius of destruction of tanks is 0,4 km), and even then only if it hits the exact center of the battle formation, which is not easy. The same effect is achieved with the successful use of 10-15 managed artillery shells (UAS) of the Krasnopol or Copperhead type with incomparable environmental consequences.
    The helicopters launched 107 Hellfire anti-tank guided missiles (ATGM) with heat-seeking homing heads, which destroyed 102 combat armored vehicles without losing any combat helicopters, since they were not in the effective fire zone of the air defense systems covering the column [3, p. 320]. Such an effect could only have been achieved by using two tactical nuclear weapons with a yield of at least 200 kt each, and even then with an optimal hit on the column.
    TO THE QUESTION OF "POSITIONAL DEADLOCK"
    ARMY COLLECTION #09 2024
    A. KALISTRATOV

    So I stick to my version: massing of small drones, secretly accumulated by the corresponding platforms https://topwar.ru/262265-amerikanskie-bombardirovschiki-b-2-spirit-ne-smogli-unichtozhit-podzemnyj-raketnyj-kompleks-husitov-s-pomoschju-protivobunkernyh-bomb.html#findcomment15159988
  9. -1
    April 8 2025 09: 50
    This is simply awesome! It's time to implement it! Everyone around is just wagging their fingers.
  10. 0
    April 8 2025 17: 34
    A pathetic cartoon, IMHO. Just like the previous pathetic cartoons. Are they going to fight with cartoons?

    I remember that before the SVO we also fought bravely with cartoons.... Hypersonics, shahimats, armats....

    But in reality, Iran could not break through Israel's defense with 2 massive attacks... The Palestinian Authority bombs Syria and Iran without massive attacks and without cartoons...
  11. -1
    April 11 2025 20: 08
    We urgently need to make a cartoon about a supertorpedo. Trump will immediately get scared and stick his head under his wife's armpit.
  12. -1
    April 11 2025 20: 12
    Quote: alexputnik17
    On the other hand, if everything were so simple for the US and Israel, they would have already turned Iran into ruins, as they know how.

    I don't think they hit. First they do it, then they talk in the media.
    What will be the price of oil after the strikes? And if Russia and the Saudis reduce production?

    Only China and India buy it anyway. Why would they understate production any more?