Combat power of militant DPRK in photos

240
The Korea Central Telegraph Agency issued images of military exercises, training of soldiers and of course Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un checking and inspiring troops. The UN Security Council ponders how likely the start of a nuclear war on the Korean Peninsula is, the world wonders how realistic the combat power of the militant North Korea is as a whole.
I suggest that you yourself think about the reality of the North Korean threats by looking at a small selection of photos that have flown around the world:



Artillery drills, 14 March 2013. (© Reuters / KCNA)



Artillery drills in the western sector of the front, 14 March 2013. (© Reuters / KCNA)



Kim Jong-un talks with soldiers who take part in anti-amphibious exercises, 25 March 2013. (© Reuters / KCNA)



North Korean leader Kim Jong-un looks at the latest developed combat and technical equipment assembled at the 1501 site by the People's Army Bash, March 24 2013. (© Reuters / KCNA)



Artillery drills, 14 March 2013. (© Reuters / KCNA)



North Korean soldiers participate in military exercises, 11 March 2013. (© Reuters / KCNA)



Korean people's army conducts military exercises.



North Korean leader Kim Jong Un monitors anti-amphibious exercises in the eastern coastal zone, 25 March 2013. (© Reuters / KCNA)



North Korean members of the Workers 'and Peasants' Red Guards participate in military training, 13 March 2013. (© Reuters / KCNA)



Kim Jong-un checks the long-range artillery unit of 641 object of the Korean People’s Army. (© KNS / AFP / Getty Images)



Kim Jong-un and the officers are watching from the hill for the flight and the teachings of parachutists at the 630 object of the Korean People’s Army. (© Reuters / KCNA)



North Korean artillery, designed to attack the islands of South Korea Daeyeonpyeong and Pennendo, participates in military exercises to establish combat capabilities in the western sector of the front. (© Reuters / KCNA)



Kim Jong-un is heading to the island of Volnai in the western sector of North Korea near the disputed sea border with South Korea. (© KNS / AFP / Getty Images)



Kim Jong-eun greets troops on the 641 long-range artillery unit during a visit to front-line military units near the border island of Pennendo. Kim called on front-line troops to be in a state of maximum alert. The state newspaper of Pyongyang warned of the threat of abolishing the 1953 truce of the year, which put an end to the Korean War. (© AP Photo / KCNA via KNS)



Kim Jong-un leaves the island of the defense detachment of the wave after an inspection in the western sector of North Korea. (© KNS / AFP / Getty Images)



North Korean soldiers participate in military exercises, 20 March 2013. (© Reuters / KCNA)



Women from an artillery detachment move a rocket launcher during anti-amphibious exercises on the east coast of North Korea, 25 March 2013. (© KCNA VIA KNS / AFP / Getty Images)



Soldiers of the Korean People’s Army are taking part in anti-airborne exercises on the east coast, 25 March 2013. (© Reuters / KCNA)



Anti-airborne exercises on the east coast, 25 March, 2013. (© Reuters / KCNA)



Soldiers of the Korean People’s Army take part in military exercises, March 6 2013. (© KNS / AFP / Getty Images)



Kim Jong-un looks at the combat equipment developed at the 1501 facility of the Korean Peoples Army, 24 March 2013. (© Reuters / KCNA)



North Korean soldiers taking part in military exercises. (© Reuters / KCNA)



Kim Jong Un looks through binoculars during a visit to the defense islands of Jangjae and Mu, southwest of Pyongyang, March 7 2013. (© Reuters / KCNA)
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    240 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +9
      April 4 2013 08: 24
      The weapons, of course, are quite outdated, hi 60-70th, and the rocket mortars are similar to the German ones, but Eun is going to crush the quantity. During breaks between air raids, he will munch from all the barrels. A la Normandy 1944. But the Germans lost with such tactics, so something else will have to oppose the enemy.
      1. djon3volta
        +8
        April 4 2013 09: 11
        if South Korea will not be helped by amers, the DPRK will conquer them without problems. The conclusion is that South Korea is weaker than the DPRK.
        1. Hon
          +16
          April 4 2013 09: 54
          The military budget is almost $ 30 billion, the equipment is the most modern. In the event of war, air superiority will be complete, due to the backwardness of the DPRK aviation and outdated air defense systems. The DPRK army is twice as large as the army of the Republic of Kazakhstan, but the southerners have a greater mobilization reserve. The soldiers are well trained, the army is constantly conducting exercises and preparing for war.
          1. smprofi
            +9
            April 4 2013 14: 05
            the soldiers of South Korea really have serious training. his father taught at the Academy and had students from Vietnam, colonel-lieutenant colonels who went through the war with gringos and hunhuzes. so, the Vietnamese spoke very respectfully of the South Koreans, in particular the White Horse division (White Horse, fought in Vietnam): a smart and cunning opponent, well suited for war in the jungle, with good American weapons.
          2. +3
            April 4 2013 18: 59
            The question is whether South Korea is ready for a protracted war
            1. BruderV
              +1
              April 4 2013 20: 35
              Quote: tots
              The question is whether South Korea is ready for a protracted war

              The question is whether the DPRK is ready at all. In a couple of months, cannibalism will begin. If in peacetime, rice on coupons.
              1. Misantrop
                +3
                April 4 2013 21: 58
                Quote: BruderV
                The question is whether the DPRK is ready at all. In a couple of months, cannibalism will begin. If in peacetime, rice on coupons.

                Debatable. There are probably gigantic-sized warehouses (including food). So in the event of a global war, the North Koreans will probably be the last to feel REAL HUNGER
                1. Misantrop
                  +2
                  April 5 2013 08: 49
                  Interestingly, the "democrats" who instructed the minuses themselves ever lived under the rationing system? Real, and not the one that their leaders scare from the screens of zombie boxes? When there is no need to rush to the shops in search of at least something edible and cheaper, and in the nearest place of residence (to which it is attached), you can always buy a full set of essential goods and at a fixed price. And in the free sale the surplus from the brought is laid out. Which is also there, since the locals are quite satisfied with what they have on the cards, so the shelves are not empty.
                  By the way, everyone is serving in the DPRK, so the food mob is simply obliged to be on ALL as well (as it will stand out on everyone, without democratic theft and speculation). Although, ... what can be convinced of those who without power theft and fraud close to the authorities of the crooks of life do not imagine ... request
          3. Gluxar_
            +2
            April 5 2013 03: 38
            Quote: Hon
            The military budget is almost $ 30 billion, the equipment is the most modern. In the event of war, air superiority will be complete, due to the backwardness of the DPRK aviation and outdated air defense systems. The DPRK army is twice as large as the army of the Republic of Kazakhstan, but the southerners have a greater mobilization reserve. The soldiers are well trained, the army is constantly conducting exercises and preparing for war.

            At purchasing power parity, military budgets are comparable. The moral readiness for war among the northerners exceeds the mood of the southerners by an order of magnitude. The resilience of economies to hostilities is not comparable, because the DPRK has been living in a state of war for 60 years and is preparing for it. The same applies to the population. Therefore, simply comparing the mobilization resource is not correct. If the DPRK can really put up to 7kk fighters under arms, equip them according to the state, then South Korea has only a hypothetical advantage because the population is not ready to fight only with a machine gun. Comparing the Air Force and Air Defense is difficult and its composition is not known reliably. The likelihood of saturation with Chinese counterparts of the S-300 is extremely high. In this case, the most populated areas of the Republic of Kazakhstan are in the radius of action of the DPRK, and this actually means the defeat in the war of the United States and its allies.
            Moreover, the presence of nuclear devices or nuclear weapons nullifies large-scale operations of the allies. And this will lead to the leveling of the technological level of the belligerents, because the classical scenario of a total preponderance of "forces and means" in any particular sector of the front will not be able to collect. And a war on a wide front means huge losses, for which the DPRK soldiers are better prepared.
            With any development of the military situation, Seoul is guaranteed to receive unacceptable damage and regardless of how the offensive of the DPRK develops, their rear areas will be closed for many months. It will not be possible to strike at them that will crush the DPRK; in fact, there is not even a guarantee of the survival of US aviation over the fortified territory of the DPRK. And this means that in fact a tangible blow to the DPRK can be delivered only by cruise missiles, the limit of which is limited. And even if you collect all of them from all fleets and bases, they will not be enough to seriously damage the DPRK infrastructure. In this case, the likelihood of a catastrophic humanitarian situation is equally probable in both the DPRK and the Republic of Kazakhstan, but the first is morally more resistant to this. And it is obvious that such a situation will lead to the need to find an acceptable political solution, which eliminates the possibility of unconditional defeat of the DPRK.
            What is the result, and so it is clear. The US is losing the region to China.
        2. Rubik
          +6
          April 4 2013 14: 57
          If DPRK does not help China and Russia, then there is no chance. In the 50s they could not win, but in the 50s they were stronger, while the southerners, on the contrary, were weaker. Now the southerners are not the same then, then they were a poor peasant country, and now it is a rich industrial power armed with more modern American weapons.
          1. Nik one
            +3
            April 4 2013 16: 42
            Neither Russia nor China are going to help the DPRK.
            1. +1
              April 4 2013 18: 43
              How to win beautifully, less costly, and without invading North Korea.
              1. Provoke the DPRK Armed Forces to launch an invasion of South Korea (it's not difficult to set a fire in a powder magazine).
              2. Retreat and defend, the more forces to cross the border from the north, the better. Perhaps even retreat from Seoul.
              What will happen: South Korea will be considered a victim of aggression, North Korea - an aggressor in the eyes of the world community. In this situation, the Russian Federation will not openly act on the side of the aggressor, so as not to ultimately undermine its international authority. The PRC, like the USSR in its time with Iraq, will have to condemn the aggressor.

              Further, the high command of the DPRK is already openly beginning to celebrate the victory, but the simple soldiers themselves will see firsthand the realities of the "rotten Western world." The fermentation of minds begins. Then the forces of the United States and the Republic of Kazakhstan begin to strike at the DPRK’s extended communications: the command loses touch with the advanced detachments. There is complete disorganization.

              Now begins the counterattack with all the power of the combined forces. The DPRK forces are fleeing, since it is one thing to guard the homeland in the trenches and it is another to be an aggressor in a hostile country, but living a hundredfold better.
              Persistent air strikes sow death and panic, a large number of demilitarized zones blown up in minefields. Together with the North Koreans, RK agitators enter the territory of the DPRK.

              The front is stabilizing where it was before aggression. This is where the revolution begins.
              1. +5
                April 4 2013 19: 35
                Quote: Skuto

                How to win beautifully, less costly, and without invading North Korea.
                1. Provoke the DPRK Armed Forces to launch an invasion of South Korea (it's not difficult to set a fire in a powder magazine).
                2. Retreat and defend, the more forces to cross the border from the north, the better. Perhaps even retreat from Seoul.
                What will happen: South Korea will be considered a victim of aggression, North Korea - an aggressor in the eyes of the world community. In this situation, the Russian Federation will not openly act on the side of the aggressor, so as not to ultimately undermine its international authority. The PRC, like the USSR in its time with Iraq, will have to condemn the aggressor.

                Not bad, but not working. It is impossible to provoke DPRK to aggression. They are not fools to sign their own death sentence. Their warlike rhetoric is primarily directed inward, and not outside the country.
                The whole point of the situation is that the United States and South Caucasus can formally win the war by bombing the DPRK in the Stone Age, but at the same time, the DPRK manages to destroy Seoul with the help of TR, OTR, which makes sense of the war from the point of view of the South Caucasus.
                That is, speaking in a chess language, a stalemate was created here.
                To beat such a situation, however, is possible indefinitely.
                1. +1
                  April 5 2013 02: 21
                  Victory will be in the minds of North Korean soldiers. they will experience a culture shock from the standard of living in South Korea, somewhat akin to the one experienced by the Red Army in 1945 in Europe, only the situation will be worse: here the war is not going to win, and the people are not alien, but their own in essence.
                  Seoul’s loss is a major blow, but worth the bargain for the prospect of a united Korea. My fabrications are just a geopolitical game no more. Minuses? Minus))) I'm used to say what I think, and not follow the rating.

                  Aggression is not difficult to unleash. Start the first pile on the counterpart)))
              2. BruderV
                +1
                April 4 2013 20: 49
                Quote: Skuto
                Perhaps even retreat from Seoul

                What the hell? I was thinking like that in the 9th probably in the distant nineties. The script is better. A war is declared and the South Caucasus, with complete dominance in the air, is bombarded with cluster bombs marching in orderly rows of northerners. What will survive snipers with the help of thermal imaging sights, while the northerners can not even understand where the fire is being fired from, on the very first night their losses will be such that any Vietnam will seem like a kindergarten. The only thing that the DPRK can count on is massive shelling of the first two three days of the war, until the positions are crushed.
                Quote: Odyssey
                formally win the war by bombing the DPRK in the Stone Age, but at the same time the DPRK manages to destroy Seoul with the help of TR, OTR

                Nobody can explain to me where the rockets will start to fly to Seoul. From any point in the DPRK, a launch missile will be hit by anyone ... F-16 is not like a missile defense system.
                1. +2
                  April 4 2013 21: 31
                  Quote: BruderV
                  Nobody can explain to me where the rockets will start to fly to Seoul. From any point in the DPRK, a launch missile will be hit by anyone ... F-16 is not like a missile defense system.

                  I already told you once that F-16s do not shoot down OTR. And even cited an article on the combat use of the Patriots in Iraq.
                  http://pentagonus.ru/publ/109-1-0-140
                  For the Patriot Pak-2 group deployed in the South Caucasus, it is realistic to intercept 70-75% of the DPRK missiles. The remaining is enough.
                  Moreover, Seoul is in the reach of direct artillery fire. Of course, extremely inaccurate, but still.
                  1. BruderV
                    0
                    April 4 2013 21: 41
                    Quote: Odyssey
                    I already told you once that F-16s don't shoot down OTR

                    No, I don’t remember. Once again, you can find out why? Is this a highly maneuverable hypersonic target? And here you have the distant 2007th year http://lenta.ru/news/2007/12/05/intercept/
                    1. -1
                      April 4 2013 22: 31
                      Quote: BruderV
                      Once again, you can find out why?

                      Because the flight time is 3-5 minutes and it flies into the stratosphere, and you can destroy warheads too.
                      In reality, even the usual RC for a fighter is a very difficult goal, but there’s no need to talk about OTR.
                      Quote: BruderV
                      http://lenta.ru/news/2007/12/05/intercept/

                      It is possible in ideal conditions with a specially equipped aircraft to destroy one missile and it is possible. But from this experience to the interception of all DPRK missiles, the distance is enormous.
                      By the way, what kind of rocket is Orion? I know the plane, I heard about the spaceship, but hu from the Orion rocket?
                      1. BruderV
                        0
                        April 4 2013 23: 18
                        Quote: Odyssey
                        By the way, what kind of rocket is Orion?

                        Most likely this one, but I don’t know for sure
                        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bold_Orion
                        1. BruderV
                          0
                          April 4 2013 23: 27
                          Quote: BruderV
                          Most likely this one, but I don’t know for surehttp: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bold_Orion

                          But I’m not lying, it was a high-altitude research rocket, not a ballistic one. I don’t know anything about her, the usual training goal for low money, as is the case in such cases.
                2. Gluxar_
                  0
                  April 5 2013 03: 53
                  Quote: BruderV
                  What the hell? I was thinking like that in the 9th probably in the distant nineties. The script is better. A war is declared and the South Caucasus, with complete dominance in the air, is bombarded with cluster bombs marching in orderly rows of northerners. What will survive snipers with the help of thermal imaging sights, while the northerners can not even understand where the fire is being fired from, on the very first night their losses will be such that any Vietnam will seem like a kindergarten. The only thing that the DPRK can count on is massive shelling of the first two three days of the war, until the positions are crushed.

                  The situation is somewhat different. When the DPRK inflicts a missile and artillery attack on the positions of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the capital Seoul, the losses will be so shocking that the political leadership will simply lose control of the situation. When the artillery works in tens of thousands of barrels, counter-battery work loses its meaning, they will cover it again. Here, who was the first to shoot back. and the advantage here is on the DPRK side. China is a longtime ally of the DPRK and its air defense systems in the conflict zone will show themselves. The RK does not have any significant superiority in aviation, because the theater of operations is quite limited and the concentration of air defense forces there is super dense. Even old systems with such a concentration will not give a chance to 250 RK aircraft to survive. Moreover, the DPRK was preparing to confront not only the Republic of Kazakhstan, but also the United States and Japan combined. And since they take such drastic steps, they consider that they have completed their homework.
                  As a result, both Kazakhstan and the United States will suffer such colossal losses on the second day that they will be forced to enter into negotiations and bargain for peace.
            2. 0
              April 4 2013 19: 00
              they’ll definitely refuse to help with food
          2. +4
            April 4 2013 20: 27
            Quote: Rubik
            because in 50 they were stronger, and southerners, on the contrary, were weaker.

            So in the 50 years of South Korea, it would not have happened if the mattress had not harnessed for it! And noted with southerners in the northern territories the use of chemical and biological weapons, the mass destruction of people and atrocities! Hence the hatred of the DPRK citizens for the amers and southerners!
            Now everyone is repeating about the odious policy of the DPRK. And if you think about it, when the threat of annihilation hangs over the people of 60 for years, you will do anything to protect yourself! And this is the fault of the Americans! There would now be a single DPRK without the artificially created, puppet southern neighbor and there would not be such problems! An example of this is Vietnam!
          3. 0
            April 4 2013 21: 26
            Quote: Rubik
            If DPRK does not help China and Russia, then there is no chance

            If the USA does not help South Korea, then it will last no more than a month ... People win, not weapons.
            1. BruderV
              +2
              April 4 2013 21: 31
              Quote: bot.su
              If the USA does not help South Korea, then it will last no more than a month

              On the calculator counted or in a column? laughing
              1. 0
                April 7 2013 08: 23
                Quote: BruderV
                On the calculator counted or in a column?

                And what, do not use accounts in your stall? smile
                There is such a method, an analogy is called. I understand that for those who are only familiar with the "calculator" and the calculation in a column, it is difficult to think abstractly, but I will try to explain.
                In 1950, it took the northerners about a month and a half to capture 90% of the territory of South Korea. At the same time, the strength of the DPRK army was even slightly less than the Republic of Kazakhstan. True, there was an advantage in aviation and armored vehicles. Now the high-quality side of the DPRK’s equipment may be slightly inferior to South Korea, but the size of the army, especially special forces, as well as almost 200 defense enterprises built underground, guarantee North Korea’s victory with the non-intervention of third forces.
            2. Gluxar_
              -1
              April 5 2013 03: 57
              Quote: bot.su
              If the USA does not help South Korea, then it will last no more than a month ... People win, not weapons.

              Where is the month from? After the first strike, the government will become incompetent. Democracies are unstable to equivalent losses, they can only fight far from their economic centers. France won Germany, too, in the 39th, was about to roll out ... but it did not work out. It will be the same here.
          4. 0
            April 5 2013 22: 41
            in the 50s, the North Koreans fought not only with the southerners but also with the UN troops, led by the United States and almost threw them into the sea !!!!!! the main thing is still fighting spirit. the northerners have nothing to lose, but the southerners will have to forget the sweet life ...
      2. +12
        April 4 2013 09: 42
        North Korean leader Kim Jong-un looks at the latest developed combat and technical equipment assembled at the 1501 facility by the Korean People’s Army, 24 March 2013

        resembles a piano laughing and also touches the antenna. looks like a props request isn't it window dressing?
        But seriously, no matter what, the DPRK army is combat-ready. and even if the weapons are far from the most modern ... after all, it is not technology that wins, but man
        1. +3
          April 4 2013 09: 47
          still touches the antenna
          The usual anter with a high degree of probability from the waffle.
          1. +2
            April 4 2013 17: 50
            Quote: self-propelled
            resembles a piano
            Each country has its own peculiarities. In the Russian Federation - "black suitcase", in the DPRK - "black piano"))) By the way, did you notice the wheels? ...... mobile wink
            1. +2
              April 4 2013 19: 24
              Have you noticed the big red button on the mouse? And the fact that the wire is plugged into a socket on a reel without a plug is also not noticed?
              1. 0
                April 4 2013 20: 46
                this is not a cape ... trackball
              2. +1
                April 5 2013 01: 04
                Quote: PARTISAN
                Have you noticed the big red button on the mouse?
                Yeah ...... If only they provided a protective casing, otherwise some bumblebee will sit on this "button" and that's it --- no more North America request
            2. +1
              April 4 2013 21: 45
              I play the piano! lol good
            3. +2
              April 5 2013 05: 39
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              ", in the DPRK -" black piano "))

              Alexey hi Made on the basis of the piano. Red October. Efficiency depends on the presence of a musical ear for the operator. laughing
        2. PiP
          +4
          April 4 2013 11: 40
          Quote: self-propelled
          isn't it window dressing?

          Definitely window dressing ("compact parabolic" (c) Genius). There are a lot of pictures and videos with outdated weapons. Everything looks like a production. Are women and men and pensioners in the same ranks? Men and women run out of the same barracks - do they have a common barracks? Painfully similar to reservists at the training camp, in this case the old weapons are justified. I'm afraid no one really saw the DPRK army
          1. PiP
            +2
            April 4 2013 16: 16
            ss
            I forgot to add about this "masquerade" on the photos - pay attention to the three fighters in the boat with Eun'om. Does anyone really not notice the difference with other fighters from the entire collection of photos? What is this screw shop they have?
            1. +5
              April 4 2013 16: 31
              Quote: PiP
              Really nobody notices differences with other fighters from all selection of photos? What is their screw shop?

              The protection of the leader is armed with a modernized Kalashnikov assault rifle. A distinctive feature of the "Korean Kalashnikov" is a large auger store.
              1. PiP
                +1
                April 4 2013 16: 40
                Is the store capacity known? The trunk is probably thicker. Rate of fire, range, ammunition? WHO KNOWS? And there are more than a few such surprises.
        3. not good
          +2
          April 4 2013 12: 44
          But how big laughing Red button
        4. +1
          April 4 2013 16: 07
          Quote: self-propelled
          resembles a piano

          no, it’s Eun replenishes the account in I Box
        5. +1
          April 4 2013 19: 03
          about mouse

          http://www.nix.ru/autocatalog/mouse_logitech/Logitech_TrackMan_Marble_USB_4btn_9
          10000808_80513.html

          OS support: Windows 8, Windows 7, Windows Vista, Windows XP, MAC OS X10.4 or later
      3. +1
        April 4 2013 21: 32
        The North Korean army is strong with its special forces:
        The number of special forces of the Korean People’s Army is estimated to range from 88 (the magazine "Foreign Military Review") to 000 (the military department of South Korea) military personnel. Five special tasks are entrusted to special forces:

        conducting reconnaissance and sabotage operations;
        operations in conjunction with the regular armed forces of the KPA;
        the organization of a “second front” in the rear of the army of South Korea and, ultimately, the achievement of strategic superiority;
        counteraction to special operations of military intelligence of the USA and South Korea in the rear areas of the DPRK;
        the fight against anti-government forces within the country and ensuring internal security. [1]

        Structurally, KPA special forces are divided into three categories: light infantry (takes part in combat operations conducted together with company or battalion level units), reconnaissance (as part of separate teams they search for intelligence or targeted information) and sniper units (tasks are the same as the light infantry, but carried out by separate teams). Organizational special forces are represented by 22 (possibly 23) brigades (including two naval landing sniper brigades, one on the east coast and the other on the west coast). The special forces also include 18 separate battalions (17 reconnaissance, including naval and air force reconnaissance battalions, and 1 airborne assault).
        The special forces are led by the two main structures of the DPRK Ministry of People’s Armed Forces: the Special Forces Command Directorate (central governing structure) and the Intelligence Directorate (the primary intelligence structure that carries out the planning of "penetration operations" and the management of the undercover apparatus).
    2. +2
      April 4 2013 08: 43
      In the photographs of many soldiers, various badges hang, it’s interesting, they just hung them, or do you really need to earn them with your sweat and work?
      1. fartfraer
        +2
        April 4 2013 11: 04
        they have constant military operations (lately it wasn’t heard, but before quite often clashes took place). I hope it’s clear in this case where the rewards come from?)
        1. +1
          April 4 2013 13: 49
          Quote: fartfraer
          they have constant military operations (lately it wasn’t heard, but before quite often clashes took place). I hope it’s clear in this case where the rewards come from?)

          earlier - when? if in the 50s, then it’s cool for a long time that their soldiers are ordinary soldiers))))
          1. fartfraer
            -1
            April 5 2013 09: 31
            yes, indeed)) in the 50s)) and the fact that in the 90s they drowned a sabotage submarine off the coast of the yuk, and then it turned out that she had already released saboteurs and was walking back) and then they caught saboteurs, but didn’t catch)) so in the 90s, sk and yuk periodically collided))
            1. +1
              April 5 2013 12: 01
              Quote: fartfraer
              so in the 90s ck and yuk periodically collided

              and for this every second SOLDIER has several awards?
    3. hunting
      +11
      April 4 2013 08: 48
      Northerners will win not to see us Samsung with hyunday wink the southerners will win pin.dos.nya will be even closer. What is good for Russia? Maybe let them unite? And not yet in the subject: Ban Ki-moon being formerly President (or Woof of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs) Yu. Korea could not solve the issue of uniting one people, but still there, now wants to resolve the problems of the whole world. Proposal: to remove from the post of UN Secretary General for professional unsuitability. wassat
      1. djon3volta
        +2
        April 4 2013 09: 06
        Why do we need this unification? It is unnecessary for Russia! Since the days of Stalin, the USSR has made buffer zones around Russia in the form of friendly countries, these are China, the DPRK, Asian states, the eastern bloc, they all entered the second echelon of the buffer, the first echelon was made up The USSR, that is, those who have disconnected, Ukraine, Tajikistan, the Baltic states, etc., created a double barrier against the enemies around the USSR !!! now we have no one left except China, the DPRK, Belarus, Kazakhstan, that is, a gap has been created near our borders. in the west and in Russia they understand this very well. perevooruzhatsya accounts and conduct large-scale exercises.
      2. +1
        April 4 2013 14: 06
        Quote: hunt
        Northerners will win not to see us Samsung with hyunday wink the southerners will win pin.dos.nya will be even closer. What is good for Russia? Maybe let them unite? And not yet in the subject: Ban Ki-moon being formerly President (or Woof of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs) Yu. Korea could not solve the issue of uniting one people, but still there, now wants to resolve the problems of the whole world. Proposal: to remove from the post of UN Secretary General for professional unsuitability. wassat

        Why South Korea will unite with a poor country, it will so undermine the economy of South Korea that they will recover in 30-50 years only. It should also be borne in mind that if unification occurs, then probably 30-40% of North Korea will try to move to South, which will entail their problems. In general, South Korea is completely unprofitable
        1. Nik one
          0
          April 4 2013 16: 40
          Yes, Germany, too, the association was not profitable. Only the question is different, no one will allow this association, because neither the United States nor China is beneficial in any way.
          1. Hon
            0
            April 4 2013 17: 14
            And for Russia, unification is also not beneficial, because in this case we will get a strong state with a strong army that has territorial claims.
          2. +1
            April 4 2013 20: 41
            Quote: Nik One
            Yes, Germany, too, the association was not profitable

            Of course unprofitable! GDR was one of the ten most developed countries in the world, and what happened in the eastern lands after unification? As the saying goes, what we have is not stored, we lose, weep ...
            And the question is only propaganda! Many in the GDR were seduced by the charms of a consumer society, and as a result, the standard of living in a united Germany fell. And only by the 2000 years rose a little ...
            1. BruderV
              +1
              April 4 2013 20: 57
              Quote: AlNikolaich
              and what happened in the eastern lands after unification?

              So what happened in the eastern lands after unification? Instead Trabantov on Mercedes and Volks moved? Monsters what.
              1. 0
                April 4 2013 23: 26
                Quote: BruderV
                Instead Trabantov on Mercedes and Volks moved? Monsters what.

                Think consumer! The East Germans were deceived by the Volks and Mercians! And as a result, in exchange for rusty carts and other "values" they lost their enterprises, jobs and hope for tomorrow! And they have become a burden to the western lands!
                1. BruderV
                  +1
                  April 4 2013 23: 31
                  Quote: AlNikolaich
                  in exchange for rusty carts, they lost their businesses, jobs and hope for tomorrow!

                  Then there is a rabble from all over the world hiding in order to taste the hopelessness of tomorrow. There unemployed now receive more benefits than I work. And if there is any Musa with 10 children, then they will give him a mansion and he will shik on children's allowances.
                2. Hon
                  +1
                  April 5 2013 09: 27
                  Quote: AlNikolaich
                  Think consumer! The East Germans were deceived by the Volks and Mercians! And as a result, in exchange for rusty carts and other "values" they lost their enterprises, jobs and hope for tomorrow! And they have become a burden to the western lands!

                  There are many factories in Germany, which means a lot of work. What hope did the inhabitants of the GDR lose? Merkel was also born in the GDR, and what prevented her from getting a job in life?
        2. Hon
          0
          April 4 2013 17: 12
          Quote: Atrix
          Why South Korea will unite with a poor country, it will so undermine the economy of South Korea that they will recover in 30-50 years only. It should also be borne in mind that if unification occurs, then probably 30-40% of North Korea will try to move to South, which will entail their problems. In general, South Korea is completely unprofitable

          If not for ideological reasons, Korea would have long been united. What are the benefits for the south? Well, for example, in a large number of cheap labor, and this makes it possible not to divert production to China. The northerners are certainly poor but they are not parasites, for them there will certainly be work in united Korea.
        3. Gluxar_
          +1
          April 5 2013 04: 02
          Quote: Atrix
          Why South Korea will unite with a poor country, it will so undermine the economy of South Korea that they will recover in 30-50 years only. It should also be borne in mind that if unification occurs, then probably 30-40% of North Korea will try to move to South, which will entail their problems. In general, South Korea is completely unprofitable

          Still go tell it to Germany.
      3. StolzSS
        +1
        April 4 2013 16: 08
        I support! Drive the pan in the suture)))
    4. +19
      April 4 2013 08: 52
      I caught myself thinking that I feel sorry for them, I feel sorry for them as people, exhausted faces, dressed hell you understand what, they don’t see anything and don’t have, a miracle has replaced the old leaders. recourse
      1. Denis_SF
        +5
        April 4 2013 09: 20
        The same thought passed, a bargaining chip, complete futility ..
      2. StolzSS
        +2
        April 4 2013 16: 10
        You are wrong about something. Pride and patriotism ...
        1. Hon
          +1
          April 4 2013 17: 16
          Quote: StolzSS
          You are wrong about something. Pride and patriotism ...

          Allow free travel abroad and proud patriots will flee migrant workers around the world.
    5. +8
      April 4 2013 08: 59
      Quote: Vladimirets
      I caught myself thinking that I feel sorry for them, I feel sorry for them as people, exhausted faces, dressed hell you’ll understand what, they don’t see and don’t have anything, a miracle replaced the old leaders



      The form, of course, not from "Yudashkin" but from natural fabrics. And notice how many people are armed, and the "miracle" is not afraid of this. It says the same thing ...
      1. fartfraer
        +11
        April 4 2013 10: 10
        Do you remember when the conscripts in "beautiful" uniforms froze in Novosibirsk? For those like these critics, they invented shoulder straps on the belly, etc. "charms", but for me it is so felt boots and sheepskin coats, as well as quilted jackets, you should always have a margin.
        experts of each other are "more authoritative")) - some form is not beautiful, others are old weapons)) I served on a conscript with a 64-year-old AKM, and nothing is a machine, you know)
        1. +1
          April 4 2013 13: 31
          Quote: fartfraer
          I served urgently with the Akm 64 model year, and nothing machine, you know)

          You, fortunately, did not have to fight with him. In battle, obsolete and worn weapons will immediately make themselves felt
          1. smprofi
            +4
            April 4 2013 14: 48
            Quote: Delta
            obsolete and worn weapons

            worn out - yes, not good.
            but the "outdated" ... somehow climbed the shooting forums, so they praise the SVD until 1975 of release (or a little earlier, that’s not the point) and later criticize: the workmanship is not that. with a bayonet with knives, already my experience - similarly.
            also crossed paths with one guy. he served in a hot spot in the 90s. made him a sniper after the qualifying rounds. so he was armed with a "mosinka" with the stigma of "his imperial majesty an arms factory ..." (by the way, at the same shooting forums, people chase after three-line precisely pre-revolutionary issues. unless, of course, the barrel is not worn out)
            1. +2
              April 4 2013 15: 14
              Quote: smprofi
              but "outdated"

              Why then would the armies of the world develop new weapons? let them fight "Boers", after all, a powerful thing.
              1. smprofi
                +4
                April 4 2013 15: 45
                Quote: Delta
                Why would the armies of the world develop new weapons?

                start with the fact that the army is not developing weapons. and weapons oh what a lucrative commodity!

                recently "anecdote" flashed: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21701588
                a bloke named James McCormick was selling "bomb detectors" (and specifically to Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Georgia and Niger) for up to $ 40,000 (£ 27,000). at the same time, his firm Advanced Detection Equipment did not invent or produce anything, but took ready-made ... "golf ball finders" at a price of ... $ 20 (£ 13)
                this is gesheft!

                Quote: Delta
                let them fight "boers"

                Well Duc ... and still fighting



                M-14 version of a sniper rifle. and saw recent photos where M1 Garand is also holding a sniper rifle.
                but the French paratroopers were sent March 28 in Mali:



                FR-F1 in service since 1965. that's just a new sight for her adapted.
                1. +1
                  April 4 2013 15: 58
                  Quote: smprofi
                  let's start with the fact that weapons are not the army

                  And the army orders the same. Which is not separable from the state.
                  Quote: smprofi
                  Well Duc ... and still fighting

                  yeah. And these same guys are also fighting "Raptors", "Virginias" and other high-tech types of weapons designed to be highly effective and hard to destroy. And the same "Boer" is a good thing, but still for the last century. You do not compare the actions of snipers (there is a very individual approach to everything there) and the same tankers, aviation, fleet
                  1. smprofi
                    +1
                    April 4 2013 16: 09
                    Quote: Delta
                    And the same guys are also fighting "Raptors"

                    The F-22 Raptor hasn't fought yet. they didn’t let him into Libya either, they frankly forgot to use this wunderwaffle “What if they’ll be shot down!”
                    however ... there is no particular desire to argue further
                2. +1
                  April 4 2013 20: 50
                  Quote: smprofi
                  Well Duc ... and still fighting

                  Another material was that the amers in Iraq seized a warehouse with PPSh, and they are using it with might and main. Yes, I saw the photo, the Amer Marine with PPSh, and the collimator and tactical handle on the forearm are attached to it ...
                  Apparently such junk sometimes works cleaner than new ... good
                  1. smprofi
                    +1
                    April 4 2013 21: 41
                    Quote: AlNikolaich
                    Another material was

                    well ... we have them, as they say in Odessa:







                    and returning to the conversation about the three-ruler:

          2. fartfraer
            -1
            April 5 2013 09: 33
            delta, this Akm will give your govododel a modern head start and anyway overtake)
            1. 0
              April 5 2013 12: 03
              Quote: fartfraer
              delta, this akm will give your govododel modern head start and anyway overtake

              mine - what is it? I do not live in the USA. And for your fantasies and dreams, certainly handicap has long been given))))
        2. +2
          April 4 2013 15: 22
          Do not say))) And our army? I served in 2003-2004. during the exercises he dragged a helmet back in which Berlin was entered))) looked at the production stamp for interest .. he spent a long time stamping some July 1945)))))
          1. smprofi
            +1
            April 4 2013 15: 57
            Quote: Snoop
            dragged a helmet in which in Berlin entered

            well, at least real. and then recently there was information that "firmachi" delivered "newfangled helmets". it turned out that they were holding nothing at all, construction helmets.
      2. +3
        April 4 2013 13: 18
        Quote: svp67
        The form, of course, not from "Yudashkin" but from natural fabrics.

        So after all, and bast shoes made of natural material, but still better in long boots.
        Quote: svp67
        And notice how many people are armed, and the "miracle" is not afraid of this. It says the same thing ...

        The miracle looks like a big-growing, underdeveloped and spoiled child who does not know that the toys are already over.
        1. 0
          April 4 2013 16: 04
          Quote: Vladimirets
          So after all, and bast shoes made of natural material, but still better in long boots.



          But aren't boots made of natural material?
          1. 0
            April 4 2013 16: 18
            Quote: svp67
            But aren't boots made of natural material?

            Tautology turned out smile , but you probably understood what I mean: naturalness does not yet provide quality.
            1. 0
              April 5 2013 04: 02
              Quote: Vladimirets
              Quote: svp67
              But aren't boots made of natural material?

              Tautology turned out smile , but you probably understood what I mean: naturalness does not yet provide quality.


              Well, then they would compare bast shoes with sneakers ... And their shape, albeit not so "modern" looks, but it has been tested in a combat situation ...
        2. +2
          April 4 2013 16: 09
          Quote: Vladimirets
          The miracle looks like a big-growing, underdeveloped and spoiled child who does not know that the toys are already over.


          Time will tell who he is and what ...
          1. +4
            April 4 2013 18: 12
            I agree that young Kim is still inexperienced in the big politics of "war and peace", but he is surrounded by grated balls of old generals. They will direct and prompt. As I understand, they have a Politburo there in the manner of ours. By the way, both Koreas took "a couple of timid steps "along the path of unification. But then, not without the help of the United States: on October 4, 2007, at a ceremony held in Pyongyang, the leader of the DPRK, Kim Jong Il, and the President of the Republic of Korea, Roh Moo Hyun, signed an eight-point Declaration on Peace and Shared Prosperity." This document summed up the results of the 2007 inter-Korean summit. It calls for peace between the two Koreas, shared prosperity and an end to military hostility. After President Lee Myung-bak came to power in Seoul, relations between the North and the South began to deteriorate sharply.
    6. demon ada
      +2
      April 4 2013 09: 13
      Yes, I think they are doomed, they are all alone against them (without open support).
      but they will break their teeth to these American mongrel be healthy.
      1. nakaz
        0
        April 4 2013 14: 30
        When the DPRK decides to occupy South Korea with areas inhabited by civilians, the thought arises whether the USA will abandon its satellite without risking to discover its monstrous animal grin throughout the civilized world.
    7. +1
      April 4 2013 09: 18
      I was pleased with the "powerful" fleet of Kim Jong-un, and especially pinned the mouse on the new North Korean laptop))) That's it, now it's definitely Khan America!
      1. +1
        April 4 2013 09: 51
        This is not a mouse, but quite an ordinary trackball.
      2. +1
        April 4 2013 09: 55
        Quote: Stiletto
        especially pinned the mouse


        And this is not a "mouse", this device is called "Trackball". The DPRK wants to go its own way here too ... smile
    8. don.kryyuger
      +2
      April 4 2013 09: 20
      How much cannon fodder! Unleash the war, the Americans will throw missiles at them, without soldiers. Sooner or later, Korea will be alone - southern.
      1. +8
        April 4 2013 09: 46
        Quote: don.kryyuger
        Sooner or later, Korea will be one - south.


        And the option that there will be no Korea, or that Korea will be, but is not being considered as part of the autonomous region as part of China?
      2. 0
        April 4 2013 20: 58
        Quote: don.kryyuger
        How much cannon fodder! Unleash the war, the Americans will throw missiles at them, without soldiers. Sooner or later, Korea will be alone - southern.

        Well, this grandmother said for two ... It is striking that the DPRK has a huge number of multiple launch rocket launchers of various calibers. Amer does not care, they are far away. And South Koreans can easily row to the fullest! And tactical missiles in the DPRK in bulk. The same thing flies to the Japanese! Amer certainly rush to save their satellites, but there may already be no one to save!
    9. Denis_SF
      +3
      April 4 2013 09: 21
      We even have mob warehouses, I think the weapons will be better.
    10. +13
      April 4 2013 09: 21
      The DPRK army has one big advantage, strong morale and patriotism. They will lay down their bones and defend themselves to the last. This is not Libya, Iraq and not even Syria. This is the DPRK and the Americans are well aware of this.
      1. fartfraer
        +5
        April 4 2013 09: 37
        Apollo, I agree. Here many are ironic, forgetting that if the "mattress" is given into the hands of the SVD, then he can lose to a warrior trained and sharpened for victory, even if the warrior is armed with a homemade caramultuk since Napoleon.
        1. +10
          April 4 2013 10: 26
          fartfraer "even if the warrior is armed with a self-made caramult from the times of Napoleon."
          I agree with you. Let people be ironic. However, the North Koreans and the military-industrial complex are well developed, or rather, probably one military-industrial complex is also developed.
          "The DPRK has built 17 factories for the production of firearms and artillery, 35 factories for the production of ammunition, 5 factories for the production of tanks and armored vehicles, 8 aircraft factories, 5 factories for the production of warships, 5 factories for the production of guided missiles, 5 factories for the production of communications equipment , 8 factories for chemical and biological weapons. In addition, many civilian factories can be converted at minimal cost to produce military products. Over 180 defense factories have been built underground in mountainous areas. "
          Although of course you can laugh at North Korea.
          1. fartfraer
            +6
            April 4 2013 10: 51
            there is no point in arguing about the development of the North Korean military-industrial complex, as well as about the army — one of the most powerful (in the world, and not only in the region) constituent factors of independence and the ability to independent politics.
            the training is very impressive, not only military, but also mobilization. It is a warrior country. Why it has become so not a topic of fasting, but that this warrior is dangerous for the enemy is beyond doubt.
            any war with the North Koreans is (among other things) capturing a mass of saboteurs on its territory, this is an enemy who feeds on grass from under his feet and is generally unpretentious in everyday life. these are well-trained soldiers with a strong ideology. I do not understand what the "experts" are ironing about, it is clear that they had nothing to do with real military operations, and whether they served in the army is a big question
        2. +5
          April 4 2013 13: 51
          Quote: fartfraer
          here many are ironic, forgetting that if the "mattress" is given into the hands of the SVD, then he can lose to a warrior trained and sharpened for victory, even if the warrior is armed with a homemade caramult from the times of Napoleon.

          yes, so many in Russia thought before Tsushima
          1. fartfraer
            -2
            April 5 2013 09: 37
            vyser is not counted)) because it was tsushima that showed that yapi were more prepared) before giving birth, think what you say) because tsushima confirms exactly my point of view, not yours
            1. +2
              April 5 2013 12: 06
              Quote: fartfraer
              vyser is not counted)) because it was tsushima that showed that yapi were more prepared) before giving birth, think what you say) because tsushima confirms exactly my point of view, not yours

              you have vysery here, and all this has long been recognized. Do not humiliate yourself once again. It was Tsushima who showed people like you the patriots that technology means a lot, and courage without it is zilch. In your terminology, he’s embossed))) And Tsushima confirmed the point of view of those who thought not only courage (which was enough on both sides) but also about what shells to shoot and how to do it
      2. +4
        April 4 2013 09: 57
        The total service life in the ground units of the Korean People’s Army ranges from 5 to 8 years. From this period, special forces soldiers serve in full force. If we consider the general structure of the special forces in the country, then they include 10 "sniper" brigades, 12 light infantry brigades, 17 separate reconnaissance battalions and one airborne battalion. Such a structure could not affect the size - North Korean special forces are one of the largest special forces units in the world and number more than 90 thousand people ...
        1. fartfraer
          0
          April 4 2013 10: 05
          Well, maybe I have outdated information, but I read that in Korean specialists it’s 10 years of service (with conscripts), and before the sabotage is carried out, they allow him no earlier than three years.
      3. +1
        April 4 2013 11: 39
        I agree completely - only one addition - with the front team, this whole army will go forward not only for patriotism - they will be offered the option of improving their lives - We will take a better life from the bourgeois for our children - and Ales will come to the southerners - they will run ahead to the distillations without a team - and the fact that the southerners have modern weapons - so for every North Korean fighter with Kalash, NATO will not have enough super missiles - the landscape of Korea is mostly mountainous (difficult), so there is a place to go secretly and hide.
      4. +5
        April 4 2013 14: 13
        Quote: Apollon
        The DPRK army has one big advantage, strong morale and patriotism. They will lay down their bones and defend themselves to the last. This is not Libya, Iraq and not even Syria. This is the DPRK and the Americans are well aware of this.

        Well, how strong morale is in the DPRK is a controversial moment, all that is visible is from the videos shown by the DPRK itself. Zhirinovsky also once said that Iraq was strong in spirit, then they said that Libya was strong in spirit, so far only Syria met expectations.
        1. smprofi
          +2
          April 4 2013 14: 51
          Quote: Atrix
          Iraq is strong in spirit, then they said that Libya is strong in spirit

          and there everything is trivially simple: "donkey with gold" played its role, in the current version - "chumodan with greenery".
          1. +2
            April 4 2013 15: 02
            Quote: smprofi
            and there everything is trivially simple: "donkey with gold" played its role, in the current version - "chumodan with greenery".

            So everywhere it was and will be. You might think that the current pseudo-revolution in the territory of the former USSR is not bought. Who said that you can't buy hungry North Koreans with the same chumadan with herbs? tired of fanaticism. Fanaticism can win, but only at the initial stage (c) Professor Preobrazhensky.
    11. 0
      April 4 2013 09: 23
      Yes, the Americans will tinker if they have so many women under arms, but how much more they can raise!
      1. +1
        April 4 2013 14: 16
        Americans will not have to fight with their soldiers, for this there is South Korea. The United States can provide technical support, populate rockets, provide intelligence data, etc. I doubt that they will want to lead troops, maybe separate special units will work, but they will lead if everything is bad and then under the mandate of the UN and NATO
        1. Gluxar_
          -1
          April 5 2013 04: 14
          Quote: Atrix
          Americans will not have to fight with their soldiers, for this there is South Korea. The United States can provide technical support, populate rockets, provide intelligence data, etc. I doubt that they will want to lead troops, maybe separate special units will work, but they will lead if everything is bad and then under the mandate of the UN and NATO

          Without the United States and its soldiers, the Republic of Kazakhstan will be defeated in a matter of days. Not a complete defeat, but irreplaceable. It will be the collapse of the ideology of capitalism and the DPRK will win.
    12. +2
      April 4 2013 09: 37
      The North Korean has another small advantage over the South - nuclear weapons.
      1. +1
        April 4 2013 14: 45
        Quote: Karavan
        The North Korean has another small advantage over the South - nuclear weapons.

        And so they urgently need a very good air defense system, then even the Americans will have to puff hi
    13. +3
      April 4 2013 09: 38
      If skillfully used it is possible to repulse all such weapons. The weapon is at least old, but reliable. Of course you can bomb them, but this is not Iraq and Libya, in North Korea there is a mountainous relief. They have a base underground tunnels dug. Underground airbases. The plants are in the same place. Normally, everything, no one will climb on them, is more expensive for themselves. And the clothes are warm, comfortable hehe ... obviously not from Yudashkin. In winter, they don’t have Sochi, humidity, fresh ... you know. Pants and jackets are insulated, so they seem baggy.
    14. +1
      April 4 2013 09: 45
      So always, at the whim of a hog with a funny haircut, a bunch of ordinary people should kill other ordinary people. And all so that this hog and a flock of close jackals would get some nishtyaks for themselves.
      1. fartfraer
        +2
        April 4 2013 12: 05
        I agree, you just have to give up and that’s all. at the mercy of the states.
        it’s a pity that you live so late, you would advise like Stalin, you would look and save millions of soldiers and civilians. (where irony everyone decides for himself)
        1. +1
          April 5 2013 09: 43
          Leave the states alone, they are going to bomb the South Koreans and not the Pentagon. What is the reason for the North Korean peasant to kill the South Korean teacher?

          The states gathered to give up :-) heh, you have megalomania, they do not need you nafig :-)
          1. fartfraer
            0
            April 5 2013 11: 10
            in general, it is South Korea that declares a preemptive strike, and the north only speaks of a possible answer)) so that when the teacher begins to threaten the peasant, the peasant has the right to defiantly pick up the forks)
    15. +9
      April 4 2013 09: 48

      For such an instructor in the BSP and TP to shoot a little clowns.
      1. +1
        April 4 2013 10: 06
        In the photo, North Korean rambo unfinished! Each of them would have already drawn ten holes in the head.
        1. fartfraer
          +5
          April 4 2013 10: 56
          you would be surprised when you saw my photos from the contract)) however, as my experience shows, the photos and reality often do not correspond, I hope it is clear that it is not so easy to draw a "hole" for a saboteur with at least three years of training, but in the Korean army there are more of them, much more than in Russian or Tanskoy. Do not judge only by the photo.
          as an example, photos of soldiers peeling potatoes in the Russian Federation cause a lot of irony, but when these soldiers "bend" hardened militants, then you somehow forget about the potatoes)
          1. +4
            April 4 2013 11: 05
            do not judge only by photo.
            Well xs all colleagues who constantly work with weapons are already working at the muscle level correctly. This applies to body motility and TB.
            1. fartfraer
              0
              April 4 2013 11: 33
              Have you seen how they are marching in parades? It's funny)) with a jump)) the third cylinder "troit" in body motility.
              but when you look on YouTube (for example) the training of their saboteurs, or hear about the service life, you understand that "motor skills" are not the worst)
              I understand that this is definitely not recruits (otherwise all comments will be just ridiculous), and I also understand that in the Russian army such phs can never be done, since we have everything with weapons since childhood.
              I hope you will understand where in my comment the irony))
        2. +5
          April 4 2013 11: 52
          Aha! It feels like the shot is staged. Looks like a Hollywood picture - they attack to their full height and shoot "from the belly"! lol I can’t believe that they studied this with an 8-year service — the postcard is obvious.
      2. +3
        April 4 2013 10: 09
        Holywood forever !!!
      3. +5
        April 4 2013 10: 17
        leon-iv "For such an instructor in BSP and TP, shoot a few CLOWNS."
        You shouldn’t be so strict ... with closed eyes, not everyone can shoot like that .. hehe .. shot and forgot called ...
      4. 0
        April 4 2013 10: 25
        Quote: leon-iv
        For such an instructor in the BSP and TP to shoot a little clowns.

        If the North Koreans are watching VO, then you can take your advice.
      5. dmitry46
        +2
        April 4 2013 10: 48
        also eyes are buried lol
        the DPRK has an invincible army ..... All enemies are scared just by sight))
        1. +2
          April 4 2013 11: 06
          also eyes are buried
          Well, it’s hard for quick-eyed people to look at the world with wide eyes.
      6. iSpoiler
        -1
        April 4 2013 16: 23
        PPC form inconspicuous ..)))
        And the shooting is not aimed ..... although .... maybe they have a special wireless sight, it’s built into the eye .. or in a cockade.))
      7. iSpoiler
        +4
        April 4 2013 16: 36
        Probably it was something like that ..))
      8. +2
        April 4 2013 22: 10
        Quote: leon-iv
        shoot a little CLOWNS.

        Rambo pancake homegrown !!!
    16. +2
      April 4 2013 09: 49
      The boat in the photo with Eun, of course, mdaaa. He's still a "dreadnought". It is strange that he came on such a vessel. Or is it to be closer to the common people?
      1. +9
        April 4 2013 10: 09
        The tree has low radio frequency, so it's a stealth boat laughing
        1. fartfraer
          +1
          April 4 2013 10: 59
          much cooler when the money of the state is spent on "representative ts." Yes, I would have transplanted all the officials from Merciers to bugs, let them ride.
          1. +2
            April 4 2013 13: 36
            Quote: fartfraer
            much cooler when the money of the state is spent on "representative ts." Yes, I would have transplanted all the officials from Merciers to bugs, let them ride.

            This is a type of proximity to the people?))) Do you know how Eun lives and how the rest of the Northern people live? so his boat is another window dress. Especially against the background of his fat cracking turnips
            1. +2
              April 4 2013 15: 50
              Quote: Delta
              Especially against the background of his fat cracking turnips


              Come on ...
              Maybe he was swollen from hunger. laughing
            2. Sirius
              +1
              April 4 2013 18: 55
              And I noticed that the background is generals, and they are all lean, to look with pleasure. Then he drew attention to the pegs. They look normal, better than ties, and more convenient than shoulder straps.
              1. 0
                April 4 2013 21: 05
                Quote: Sirius
                Then he drew attention to the Lychki

                this buttonhole is called ... tongue
            3. fartfraer
              +1
              April 5 2013 09: 42
              yes, yes)) this is from the series "putin on" Kalina ". only something I doubt that there is a place to run)) and you can't hear about foreign accounts))
              By the way, tell me how he lives, I see you are an expert on North Korean realities.
    17. +6
      April 4 2013 09: 50
      I kept thinking who Kim Jong-un reminds me of .... Remember "From Dusk Till Dawn" ?! Adopted son, Korean, pastor.Vylytyy.Only matured.With a "cheerful" mood can be easily confused. And according to the plot of the film, the brave, fighting guy had a terrible ending. Ghouls gnawed at him. Kim is like that actor! Especially when he smiles.
      1. +1
        April 4 2013 15: 29
        So this is it))) Fed)))
    18. +2
      April 4 2013 09: 51
      Quote: leon-iv
      [Img]

      For such an instructor in the BSP and TP to shoot a little clowns.



      The usual "ballet" to please the eyes of the Supreme, and what did you expect to show tactical developments?
    19. +11
      April 4 2013 09: 53
      Here's how to hold the machine
      1. +1
        April 4 2013 10: 29
        PS I forgot to add this my personal photos were taken recently
        1. fartfraer
          +1
          April 4 2013 11: 01
          cool you keep the machines) but want a joke, you are on the same line, on one line, and the "clumsy" Koreans are distributed more competently, in a rare chain)) so who is the "special"?
          1. +4
            April 4 2013 11: 20
            lal well, certainly not you; this is one of the exercises of the TSP Sturm to increase the density of fire in the base structure.
            1. fartfraer
              0
              April 4 2013 11: 42
              that's all) the difference in tactics, etc.) you won't be able to attack the entrenched company like that, although you hold the machine gun correctly, yes, I'm not special, but I bet that it would be easier for me personally to hit you with a standard weapon exactly when you are so located, and not "scattered" like Koreans.
              it’s not a belittling or an insult, it’s just a fact. you are obviously not honing for an army attack in the fields (in this photo).
          2. -1
            April 4 2013 13: 39
            Quote: fartfraer
            you are on the same line, on the same line

            On one line - these are picture "heroes" stretched out in a chain. And those standing behind each other are just not for the queue
            1. fartfraer
              -1
              April 5 2013 11: 19
              let's start with the basics - when fired, Kalash leads a little up, as we were taught in the army)) now the question is what prevents the enemy from sitting in the trenches to aim at the chest of the first soldier and give a turn? Will the barrel lead slightly up and the second will catch its share of lead, isn’t it? Now we’ll develop the situation, two by two. The comrades go as in the photo, the other comrades in a rare chain like the Koreans.
              photo heroes with their concentrated fire will demolish one Korean in any way)) am I right? and now we return to the position of heroes, they are on the same line, the second Korean will put them without straining
              clarification, all this is said about actions in the open, during the storming of a building, fire density undoubtedly solves problems (for example, on flights of stairs)
              but now you can tell me that I'm wrong and do not fight at all)
        2. 0
          April 4 2013 21: 09
          Quote: leon-iv
          PS I forgot to add this my personal photos were taken recently

          In the photo MVDshniki, an exercise for urban combat! Clarify riot police or explosives? hi
          1. +1
            April 4 2013 22: 59
            Riot police or explosives?
            Airsoft VERY well VERY strongly associated with the Ministry of Internal Affairs in particular with the BSP
            Top it's me
            1. BruderV
              0
              April 4 2013 23: 07
              Quote: leon-iv
              Airsoft players

              And I watch a motorcycle helmet laughing , pokemon style.
              1. 0
                April 4 2013 23: 55
                And I watch a motorcycle helmet, Pokemon style.
                Yes, it’s not ZSh-1. At first they dragged the original ones, but after 2-3 hours the neck was sour in it, even with my experience in martial arts. Bought replicas.
                + In addition, I also have active rifle bands in the active headphones there, with an embankment and another DTK-1 from the anti-aircraft gun. It extinguishes the impact perfectly, but the sound pressure will grind by 70%. Simply put, the pogs are overwhelming.
                shooting 2/3 of zinc (for 3) colleagues was already hard to perceive. For everything was heard badly.
                Now those members of our team who serve ordered themselves 9 sets from the anti-aircraft guns including 5 DTK-4 let's see what comes. And how he shoots a gross cartridge
                1. BruderV
                  0
                  April 5 2013 00: 10
                  In the original school, I trained without a visor, it’s not very hard (it’s hard to drag a custom PCM))), but you can’t hear your figs without a loringophone, then I went to another team there in panama hats, in winter there was no problem. If also with a visor, then many stumble out of the blue, because it fogs up and distorts the perception of distance due to bulletproof glass.
                  1. 0
                    April 5 2013 00: 23
                    In the original school of art without a visor, I trained, it seems not very hard
                    The question is loads. Right now, we have current in them if buildings in the forest have nothing to do with caps
                    Right now, the whole SOBR has bought bourgeois helmets for mountains and Altyn or ZSh-1M
                    for buildings.
    20. Krasnoyarsk
      -2
      April 4 2013 10: 26
      Combat museum
    21. Nasty
      -1
      April 4 2013 10: 32
      And so quick-eyed, and even squint!
    22. +1
      April 4 2013 10: 34
      Quote: Krasnoyarets
      Combat museum


      That's just it. that museum workers have recently become very active ...
    23. ChornuiVoron
      +2
      April 4 2013 10: 47
      We need to think about how to feed the people. And he plays in the soldiers.
      1. fartfraer
        -1
        April 4 2013 11: 16
        that’s what you think about it day and night) how many hours in Moscow do you watch yourself? Can’t you feed yourself? I don’t feel sorry, I’m even for the help of the brotherly people, but when you start to teach and want to say, learn yourself!
        rejoice that Ukraine does not border on Korea and does not have problems with them, for Ukraine could not solve these problems without help from outside.
        well, and lastly, aspiring to NATO, I want to say that Ukraine, in fact, does not now have independence, Russia is not 100% independent, and Korea is completely independent, even managing to create and maintain an army and various technologies even in the blockade. resources, which are many in the Russian Federation or in Ukraine.
        1. ChornuiVoron
          +2
          April 4 2013 11: 36
          At our place, people do not receive 400 grams of rice per day on cards. And there are no trucks working on a tree. Is independence only for a funny fatty leader, or can Koreans freely leave the country? Do not work on a plantation at gunpoint? That's independence.

          Regarding Ukraine, did you see a flag and like a bull on a comment? Ukraine is an independent country and can decide what to do and where to join.
          1. 0
            April 4 2013 13: 42
            Quote: ChornuiVoron
            At our place, people do not receive 400 grams of rice per day on cards. And there are no trucks working on a tree. Is independence only for a funny fatty leader, or can Koreans freely leave the country? Do not work on a plantation at gunpoint? That's independence.

            Regarding Ukraine, did you see a flag and like a bull on a comment? Ukraine is an independent country and can decide what to do and where to join.


            applause
          2. M. Peter
            -2
            April 4 2013 19: 05
            Quote: ChornuiVoron
            At our place, people do not receive 400 grams of rice per day on cards. And there are no trucks working on a tree. Is independence only for a funny fatty leader, or can Koreans freely leave the country? Do not work on a plantation at gunpoint? That's independence.


            But I’m always wondering when you write about Sev.Korea like that, how do you feel confident that they eat 400 gr. rice per day? Have you ever been to North Korea at all? A very common misconception. They don’t eat there, but there’s no hunger at all.
            1. Hon
              0
              April 4 2013 20: 08
              Quote: M.Pyotr
              But I’m always wondering when you write about Sev.Korea like that, how do you feel confident that they eat 400 gr. rice per day? Have you ever been to North Korea at all? A very common misconception. They don’t eat there, but there’s no hunger at all.

              I rode somehow with the Koreans in the bus, so they were even dressed in their uniforms, probably in the absence of another.
              1. M. Peter
                0
                April 5 2013 06: 59
                Quote: Hon
                I drove like that with the Koreans in the bus

                And you thought how they got here, because the country is in isolation, the evil dictator doesn’t let anyone in, but doesn’t let anyone out? Or were you in the very north of Korea?

                Quote: Hon
                so they were even dressed in their uniforms, probably in the absence of another.

                Apparently, schoolchildren from the times of the USSR, but also for the lack of any other clothes, everyone was dressed in uniform. wink

                The site says a lot about how to think with your own head, do not look back to the "west" and so on, but all these nonsense about hunger, cold and concentration camps in the DPRK are just imposed on us by this very "west". By the way, you can visit the DPRK as a tourist, it is not such a closed country as many think.
                There, in the DPRK, if you eat you can’t get what Thailand offers, satisfaction of low lust, when prostitutes are the main goods, transvestites and the like, no. The feeling will be as if you returned to the USSR, cleanly and calmly.
                1. Hon
                  0
                  April 5 2013 09: 42
                  Quote: M.Pyotr
                  And you thought how they got here, because the country is in isolation, the evil dictator doesn’t let anyone in, but doesn’t let anyone out? Or were you in the very north of Korea?

                  Up which creeping across borders. It was about a year ago in Moscow, route 431М, I went to Zelik. Three Koreans came in with bags, what the Koreans understood in form.
                  Quote: M.Pyotr
                  Apparently, schoolchildren from the times of the USSR, but also for the lack of any other clothes, everyone was dressed in uniform.

                  Pupils under 40 did not wear uniforms, and these guys were clearly older.
                  Quote: M.Pyotr
                  By the way, you can go to the DPRK as a tourist, it’s not such a closed country as many people think.

                  Yes, I know this year tourists even stopped taking mobile phones and were allowed to use the Internet.
                  Quote: M.Pyotr
                  The feeling will be as if you returned to the USSR, cleanly and calmly.

                  Have you been there? Did you manage to communicate with ordinary citizens of the DPRK?
          3. fartfraer
            0
            April 5 2013 09: 49
            yes, Ukrainians do not get rice on ration cards) they just sell their labor force abroad)) what kind of independence are you talking about? your economy is slag, it’s even easier to give you a slag on the economy than the Russian Federation, you will run away forgetting patriotism if you have “rice on ration” ". full expression of the nation, or is it still reversible? where are the descendants of the Koaaks, who made the Poles and Swedes cancer? only Mazeppians remained) now you can read about Ukraine only in" Taras Bulba ", because his descendants steal gas, work outside the country and have lost their former power of spirit
          4. fartfraer
            0
            April 5 2013 11: 23
            it’s strange that you are complexing about your flag) Well, I won’t argue about Ukraine’s independence, it was she who completely blackmailed Russia with gas transit and left Europe without gas at the time. It’s exactly she who breaks into NATO and helped Georgians in the war with Russia
        2. +1
          April 4 2013 13: 42
          Quote: fartfraer
          and Korea is completely independent

          And FOOD does not refuse help. Moreover - it is being traded already.
      2. Sirius
        0
        April 4 2013 19: 01
        "The court makes the king." Kim Jong-un is a slave to his environment, a slave to his destiny. Even if he wants to change something, will he be able to do a lot, a puppet in the hands of the generals?
    24. dmitry46
      +2
      April 4 2013 10: 53
      Do they have any armor plates at all? all only with machine guns, and in one helmeted photo .... Fearless army)
    25. +5
      April 4 2013 11: 04
      I don’t understand what this Korean clown wants? Now is not the year 1950, and no one will harness for North Korean ambitions. They will get Uncle Sam, and then they just roll out. The only pity is people who are kept like cattle (a woman should watch the house, not carry shells). The DPRK, as a political project, has worked out its own. It is better for us to have a stable economic partner on the border than idiots, and even with a dirty nuclear bomb.
      1. Vovka levka
        +2
        April 4 2013 11: 20
        Childhood in the pope plays. And people, that people, in one place have them.
        If anything, the army will scatter. Zealots of course have their own will shoot. Such a dictatorial, inhuman state can exist only in a complete information vacuum. But this vacuum is no longer there. Just so that troubles are not done, otherwise everyone will get it, nuclear weapons are not a joke.
        1. fartfraer
          +2
          April 4 2013 11: 59
          "Childhood plays in the priest." - for sure)) some still believe in democracy and independence)
          "If anything, the army scatters" - you are a fine connoisseur of the spiritual strings of Koreans. If there was a possibility of a real clash between the Ukrainian army and the North Koreans, I would bet on the latter.
          "Such a dictatorial, inhuman state can exist only in a complete information vacuum" - here I agree. Until the poison of a liberal lie does not spread personal opinion, a person believes his eyes, and only then he changes free medicine and education for a hundred varieties of sausages and jeans. Valiant Ukraine is alive an example of an open society, it is so open that the mass of Ukrainians work in Russia, the mass in Europe, and very few raise the economy of the brotherly state. This is a shame for Ukraine, but you can put up with it, the main thing is democracy rules.
          "nuclear weapons are not a joke." - and here I agree, this is the only deterrent to "peace-loving democratic" Uncle Sam
          1. Vovka levka
            +2
            April 4 2013 12: 37
            In Ukraine, not democracy rules, but boys. There is nothing free in the world, just payment methods are different.
          2. Kalita
            +2
            April 4 2013 19: 09
            There will be great joy in Uncle Sam’s country when Russia and Ukraine finally quarrel. So let's not give them such joy, but learn to respect each other.
            1. Vovka levka
              0
              April 4 2013 23: 21
              I agree, I just won’t allow myself that, I have many friends in Russia. The fact that some people allow themselves such statements is probably from a lack of education, and the school of life.
              Honestly, there is no desire to comment.
      2. fartfraer
        0
        April 4 2013 11: 52
        "They'll get Uncle Sam, and then they'll just roll them out." - these are the main words of your comment - the main thing is not to get Uncle Sam) such as you were in power in the 90s, they agreed to everything, if only the "economy" of the wallet did not suffer and Uncle Sam wasn't angry.
        you took for yourself a loud nickname-Prometheus, who brought fire against the will of the gods, received a terrible punishment for this, although in fact you are ready to sell your neighbor ("it is better for us to have a stable economic partner on the border") just so as not to anger Uncle Sam. here is more suitable nickname "Judas" ... not an insult, God forbid. just an analogy.
        1. +2
          April 4 2013 13: 46
          Quote: fartfraer
          "They'll get Uncle Sam, and then they'll just roll them out." - these are the main words of your comment - the main thing is not to get Uncle Sam) such as you were in power in the 90s, they agreed to everything, if only the "economy" of the wallet did not suffer and Uncle Sam wasn't angry.
          you took for yourself a loud nickname-Prometheus, who brought fire against the will of the gods, received a terrible punishment for this, although in fact you are ready to sell your neighbor ("it is better for us to have a stable economic partner on the border") just so as not to anger Uncle Sam. here is more suitable nickname "Judas" ... not an insult, God forbid. just an analogy.


          And here you basically go to personalities and nicknames, from a lack of argumentation. By the way, if about nicknames - your "Cool")))))
          1. fartfraer
            0
            April 5 2013 10: 02
            By the way, yes)) why are we on the personality)) began to insult a fat Korean))
            leave your policy of double standards, you are the same person as you, only he runs the state)
            1. -1
              April 5 2013 12: 10
              Quote: fartfraer
              began to insult the fat Korean)

              can a link about the insult to the "fat Korean"?
        2. +4
          April 4 2013 14: 55
          fartfraer
          I will tell you so. The transition to personality and discussion of nicknames indicates your failure. Without knowing the person, you are ready to attribute to him qualities that he never had. Well, okay, the Internet will endure everything.
          In the 90s, like most people, I tried to survive, and even now, essentially nothing has changed. If you think that something has changed since then, you are naive. Some thieves and jackals succeeded others in power. But I didn’t fall into power - I didn’t learn to lie and steal for my conscious life.
          And the point is not to please Uncle Sam. DPRK is a beggarly country with a miserable ruling regime. Instead of looking for ways to integrate with the South, these idiots rattle with rusty metal and shake their little fists. I am personally worried that our country is at hand with such inadequacy that threatens its neighbors with an atomic bomb. And where is the guarantee that their missile will go astray, will fly not to the Pacific Ocean, but to Vladivostok. In this case, too, will you praise and support Eun?
          1. Vovka levka
            +2
            April 4 2013 15: 03
            I totally agree.
          2. fartfraer
            -1
            April 5 2013 09: 58
            did not set out to offend you.
            however, it is not possible and necessary to negotiate with everyone. both in politics and in life. chavez did not negotiate with them, Lukashenko does not matter what Europe says about him, but he "does not negotiate", a scoundrel) history has taught that treaties are valid only as long as they are beneficial to the strong side.
            for example, give the historical facts - the Munich agreement, the Molotov-Ribentrop pact, the SNV, on conventional weapons in Europe, etc., all these agreements turned out to be bullshit, so why is he ""? maybe he just knows the price of the agreements?
    26. Vrungel78
      +2
      April 4 2013 11: 09
      Well, the UK has enough spirit (albeit bad), weapons, albeit old, but, I suppose, by analogy with the Soviet, reliable operation, envy-learning, but the nano-boat will not float away
    27. +2
      April 4 2013 11: 14
      Fat Eun verbiage. There will be no war, because of this fat animal, America will repeatedly strengthen the missile defense system in Alaska, which is harmful to us. How is Eun so obese in a country where hunger is from the 90s.
      1. fartfraer
        0
        April 4 2013 11: 46
        Lech, you look at the soldier)) everything from starvation is already transparent)) not otherwise they will eat them))
    28. fartfraer
      -6
      April 4 2013 12: 14
      you can delete my komenty as much as you like)) you just have nothing to argue.
      your irony breaks down on the facts, your "pride" is ridiculous, given your condemnation of an independent state in spite of the states. continue to be slaves, be afraid of people and sneer at the obviously weak, but independent, remaining essentially strong, but terribly stupid slaves. health to all, it is for you will be needed when working on s
      1. dmitry46
        +4
        April 4 2013 13: 08
        did you smoke
    29. +2
      April 4 2013 13: 27
      Quote: Apollon
      The DPRK army has one big advantage, strong morale and patriotism. They will lay down their bones and defend themselves to the last. This is not Libya, Iraq and not even Syria. This is the DPRK and the Americans are well aware of this.


      Well, high morale is only in the pictures and while they are under the rule of their god. In Iraq, the army also boasted while it was near Hussein.
      At the very first shecher, this whole North Korean crowd will scatter.
      You have to be completely an idiot to fight for IT. They know how their southern brothers live and they are confident in their hearts that they hope and wait for their regime to fall.
    30. +2
      April 4 2013 13: 29
      In many pictures, the young leader has an openly blissful expression on his face, a constantly drooping jaw.
      And they really feel sorry for their fighters, and the rest of the people - zombie people, exhausted faces, poverty, idolatry, an absurd show against the background of outdated weapons - what is all this for? You look at the photos and you realize that you are in the middle of the last century. China also lives "with ideas", nevertheless, the difference is felt ...
    31. smprofi
      +3
      April 4 2013 13: 35
      and it's all?
      can add...











      1. +1
        April 4 2013 13: 50
        What a variety of small arms they have and how they should "struggle" with providing ammunition, only the submachine guns and machine guns shown in the photo require three different types of cartridges ...
        1. smprofi
          +2
          April 4 2013 14: 16
          Quote: svp67
          they have to "struggle" with providing ammunition

          hmm ... and in the Soviet / Russian rifle platoon AKM / RPK - 7,62x39 (later, under AK-74 - 5,45 × 39), PK / SVD - 7.62x54R. tormented too or are tormented now?
      2. dmitry46
        0
        April 4 2013 15: 10
        Looking at the 1st and 3rd photo, I realized where all the string bags disappeared)))
        From North Koreans, they stole from us for the needs of their army)))
      3. dmitry46
        +1
        April 4 2013 15: 11
        Looking at the first 3 photos, I realized where all the string bags disappeared)))
        From North Koreans, they stole from us for the needs of their army)))
        1. +1
          April 4 2013 16: 56
          dmitry46 "North Koreans stole from us for the needs of their army)))"
          Probably rather the militia.
      4. +3
        April 4 2013 15: 43
        Tar is cool.
        1. smprofi
          +2
          April 4 2013 15: 48
          Quote: fzr1000
          Tar is cool.

          there are two of them: DP and RPD
          1. +2
            April 4 2013 17: 01
            I'm talking about DP - 27. soldier
        2. 0
          April 4 2013 17: 42
          Especially in the second decade of the XXI century, when spacecraft plowed ... and fiction becomes a reality)
      5. +1
        April 4 2013 17: 57
        Three things were killed:
        - age of fighters, as in Petrovsky Russia periodically come across
        - Women participate in all this obscurantism along with men. Maybe they share the barracks together? ..
        - the complete absence of any equipment on the fighters - belt with ear flaps-machine
        1. Hon
          +1
          April 4 2013 18: 41
          Quote: Nickanor
          Three things were killed:
          - age of fighters, as in Petrovsky Russia periodically come across
          - Women participate in all this obscurantism along with men. Maybe they share the barracks together? ..
          - the complete absence of any equipment on the fighters - belt with ear flaps-machine

          This is the Workers 'and Peasants' Red Guard (RKKG, from 1,4 to 3,8 million people), that is, a kind of US national guard. Hence the age, women and scarce ammunition
    32. The comment was deleted.
    33. smprofi
      +2
      April 4 2013 13: 40
      continuation, all at once in 1 comment does not fit









      1. smprofi
        +2
        April 4 2013 13: 43






        Well, the video that in 3 days South Korea will be captured and 150 gringos will be captured

        1. 0
          April 4 2013 15: 35
          In the second photo he has such a facial expression on the machine - what for G ...?))
          1. smprofi
            +3
            April 4 2013 15: 51
            Quote: Snoop
            he has such an expression

            that's better?

      2. +1
        April 4 2013 16: 15
        Great photos, thanks. J-7II and Mig-29 in full bandage were especially pleased.
        By the way, the J-7 looks surprisingly fresh.
    34. +2
      April 4 2013 13: 56
      And "accordions" for the ceremonial entry into Seoul ... bully
      1. +1
        April 4 2013 21: 44
        Quote: svp67
        And "accordions" for the ceremonial entry into Seoul ...

        These are not accordions, but military and technical equipment, like a piano with an antenna and a mouse laughing
    35. 0
      April 4 2013 14: 09
      But I’m looking at them and it seems to me that they have a common idea and purpose, and you know it gives a lot ... remember how our grandfathers fought with the Nazis ... the same because there were only sticks from weapons ... and then nothing through self-sacrifice they snatched victory.
      1. +1
        April 4 2013 14: 25
        Quote: Jrvin
        the same after all from a weapon there were only sticks.

        this is where were some sticks ???
      2. +1
        April 4 2013 14: 34
        Quote: Jrvin
        But I’m looking at them and it seems to me that they have a common idea and purpose, and you know it gives a lot ... remember how our grandfathers fought with the Nazis ... the same because there were only sticks from weapons ... and then nothing through self-sacrifice they snatched victory.

        There was no fall why are you fooling people? The USSR may or may not have lagged behind Fascist Germany, but not as much as North Korea is lagging behind South; there, the gap in armaments is 50-60 years. So this is not a correct comparison.
      3. Hon
        +3
        April 4 2013 15: 17
        Quote: Jrvin
        But I’m looking at them and it seems to me that they have a common idea and purpose, and you know it gives a lot ... remember how our grandfathers fought with the Nazis ... the same because there were only sticks from weapons ... and then nothing through self-sacrifice they snatched victory.

        It was in Mikhalkov’s films that our grandfathers fought with sticks while the far-armed commanders ate vodka. However, in reality there was no technical superiority of Germany over the union. In some types of weapons they lagged behind in some, they had superiority. By the end of the war, excelled in almost everything. And they fought not only selflessly but also skillfully.
      4. Kalita
        +1
        April 4 2013 19: 23
        Do not study the history of Hollywood films, read memoirs (now there are German in translation). Learn a lot, honestly, but about
        sticks there not a word!
    36. 0
      April 4 2013 14: 24
      Quote: Jrvin
      But I’m looking at them and it seems to me that they have a common idea and purpose, and you know it gives a lot ... remember how our grandfathers fought with the Nazis ... the same because there were only sticks from weapons ... and then nothing through self-sacrifice they snatched victory.

      I agree with you. Amerikosy will not come to them openly, because for them it will be another Vietnam and Afghanistan. You look at how they are fanatically tuned, they are convinced that all their troubles are from the USA, the flywheel of propaganda is untwisted as it should. Well, pulling it into it Amers take over South Korea one more heavy burden, after all, the two-edged sword is obliged to help.
    37. alex0000
      +2
      April 4 2013 14: 25
      The method of connecting a military Uber computer to the network, by plugging the wires into a 50-meter extension cord, without a plug, caused genuine admiration. And away from the clear eyes of the Führer.
    38. Arrowslinger
      0
      April 4 2013 14: 25
      Quote: leon-iv

      For such an instructor in the BSP and TP to shoot a little clowns.


      Yes, and somehow camouflage is not suitable for coloring, they stand out very much on the ground. smile
      1. dmitry46
        +1
        April 4 2013 15: 07
        it’s special, so as not to shoot in your own way! )))
      2. +1
        April 5 2013 04: 21
        But these guys on the background of rocks you can already not notice
    39. smprofi
      +1
      April 4 2013 15: 05
      once again it's a good idea to remind you that gringos are also good, not "white and fluffy"



      B-52 Stratofortress in "training flight" over South Korea. "train" regularly, from March 8th.

      near Pyeongtaek, Osan US Air Base



      1. 0
        April 4 2013 15: 10
        Quote: smprofi
        once again it's a good idea to remind you that gringos are also good, not "white and fluffy"

        Observe your interests
      2. +2
        April 4 2013 15: 42
        Of course I understand that I am pouring gasoline into the fire, but ... if there were clashes and the DPRK was lucky enough to fill up one of the Raptors, like F 117 in Yugoslavia ... Both China and Russia in exchange for the wreckage of 10 years would feed North Korean comrades for free.
        1. +1
          April 4 2013 21: 49
          Quote: fzr1000
          if there were clashes and the DPRK was lucky to overwhelm one of the Raptors, like F 117 in Yugoslavia ... Both China and Russia in exchange for the wreckage of 10 years would feed North Korean comrades for free.

          Well there Raptor there is such a brilliant thing that we do not know and can not do?
      3. 0
        April 4 2013 16: 54
        Great pics again drinks
        Both the F-16 and the Raptors look pretty good. But the Mig-21 / J-7 will kick their ass smile
    40. nagi
      +1
      April 4 2013 15: 46
      The idea is that the soldiers of the North Korean army lack combat experience. Kim Jong-un should send his brigades to Syria to train soldiers in urban fighting on the side of Assad. North Korea and so in disgrace they have nothing to lose. And the Russian Federation, under the guise of fighting hunger in North Korea, delivered products to the DPRK to pay for the actions of DPRK soldiers on the territory of the SA.
      1. 0
        April 4 2013 17: 27
        Did the Russians already grab their own food? As far as YOUR state statistics knows, you buy the crap yourself abroad ... up to 40% ... So that you yourself have not gone far from the DPRK in the sense of YOUR food ...
        1. Hon
          +1
          April 4 2013 17: 38
          Quote: I think so
          Did the Russians already grab their own food? As far as YOUR state statistics knows, you buy the crap yourself abroad ... up to 40% ... So that you yourself have not gone far from the DPRK in the sense of YOUR food ...

          We not only buy and import, for example, Russia is the third largest grain producer in the world after the United States and the European Union. At the same time, agricultural imports are declining every year.
          1. -2
            April 4 2013 17: 50
            Dear, you generally know the meanings of the words "IMPORT", "EXPORT", so you insert your five cents and you don't even know the meaning of the words. They would search the Internet.
            And according to your remark, I’ll say: You EXPORT grain because you can’t use this grain for business and it rots. It turns out your EXPORT to you and to the detriment. The grain is CHEAP, and MEAT, fed with THIS grain, is bought EXPENSIVELY. So, to be proud of such an export - to be simply not in the know ...
            1. Hon
              +2
              April 4 2013 18: 35
              Quote: I think so
              Dear, you generally know the meanings of the words "IMPORT", "EXPORT", so you insert your five cents and you don't even know the meaning of the words.

              Where are we poor and wretched to high knowledge of what export and import are?
              Quote: I think so
              And according to your remark, I’ll say: You EXPORT grain because you can’t use this grain for business and it rots. It turns out your EXPORT to you and to the detriment. The grain is CHEAP, and MEAT, fed with THIS grain, is bought EXPENSIVELY. So, to be proud of such an export - to be simply not in the know

              There are no problems with the grain shortage on the domestic market of the Russian Federation, we export only 20% of the produced grain, while still remaining third in the world. By the way, only marbled beef is fed with grain, in all other cases they use special compound feeds. The main importers of grain from Russia are Saudi Arabia, Iran, Italy, Spain, Israel, Tunisia, Morocco, Greece and Egypt, we do not import meat products from these countries. So what kind of meat do we buy fed our grain ?!
              The United States, obviously, also cannot use the grain produced at home because it is the world's largest exporter. And stupid Canadians simply don’t know where to use the dropped wheat.
              Perhaps you just read the article of some kind of homegrown pseudo-economist and imagined yourself very smart.
        2. -1
          April 4 2013 17: 46
          Quote: I think so
          Did the Russians already grab their own food? As far as YOUR state statistics knows, you buy the crap yourself abroad ... up to 40% ... So that you yourself have not gone far from the DPRK in the sense of YOUR food

          Yes, when oil prices fall in Russia, mass hunger will begin crying
          In that year alone, $ 40 billion worth of food was purchased.
          1. 0
            April 4 2013 21: 53
            Quote: Odyssey
            Yes, when oil prices fall in Russia, mass hunger will begin

            Russians have not yet become accustomed to growing vegetables in their gardens. So, we will not die of hunger, but we have plenty of bread.
        3. M. Peter
          +2
          April 4 2013 19: 17
          Quote: I think so
          Did the Russians already grab their own food? As far as YOUR state statistics knows, you buy the crap yourself abroad ... up to 40% ... So that you yourself have not gone far from the DPRK in the sense of YOUR food ...


          There is the concept of food security. Russia provides for itself. With this, everything is fine with us, if something is imported there, it has nothing to do with food safety, because bananas do not grow here ...
          1. +1
            April 4 2013 20: 40
            Quote: M.Pyotr
            There is the concept of food security. Russia provides for itself. With this, everything is fine with us, if something is imported there

            Cattle stock
            in 1990-57 million. goals
            in 2012-20 million goals.
            No comment
            1. M. Peter
              0
              April 7 2013 14: 06
              Quote: Odyssey
              The number of cattle in 1990 is 57 million. head 2012-20 million heads No comment

              And what does it mean that behind "No comment", like I was all exposed, we have a complete failure in terms of food security, or what?
    41. 0
      April 4 2013 16: 18
      And no one has considered such an option if the DPRK begins to lose, on their territory can they crash nuclear charges?
      1. +1
        April 4 2013 17: 25
        Why would they "on their own" if there is so much enemy around ...
        Tokyo, Okinawa, Guam, Hawaii.
        According to some reports, they can reach the US coast. This is where gifts will fly. Maybe some will fly by ...
        1. Hon
          +1
          April 4 2013 17: 30
          Quote: I think so
          According to some reports, they can reach the US coast. This is where gifts will fly. Maybe some will fly by ...

          Given the quality of missiles, they can also boast in the Russian Federation.
          1. 0
            April 4 2013 17: 53
            Do not worry about their normal rockets, especially medium-range ones. Strategic - but still little tested, and tactical and medium range are quite at the level ...
      2. Hon
        +1
        April 4 2013 17: 27
        Quote: krokodil25
        And no one has considered such an option if the DPRK begins to lose, on their territory can they crash nuclear charges?

        Yes, from all these you can expect
        1. 0
          April 4 2013 18: 10
          Quote: Hon
          Yes, from all these you can expect


          Here I am about the same thing because fanatics are capable of anything !!!
    42. +3
      April 4 2013 18: 03
      On the faces of Koreans, fanaticism is noticeable, something that we lost in 1990, and also that in many ways can be a big advantage in a hypothetical military conflict.
      There is no former fanaticism in us

      and the Chinese and Koreans have it ...
      1. smprofi
        +3
        April 4 2013 19: 57
        Quote: JackTheRipper
        Not in us

        but it was ...

        1. +1
          April 4 2013 21: 27
          Patrio about Muert!
          Viva la revolution!
          Thank you, pleased with the video! hi
    43. 0
      April 4 2013 18: 15
      Am I the only one who noticed a machine gun similar to "Bran"?
      1. smprofi
        +1
        April 4 2013 19: 54
        it is not Bren, i.e. Czech ZGB-33, and mine, Type 73 under Russian / Soviet cartridge 7.62x54R
      2. PiP
        +1
        April 4 2013 20: 07
        TYPE-73 - aka under the general name "BREN" (for the appearance).
        smprofi correctly noticed initially this is a Czech. Submission of patricians can be from the main store or tape
        1. smprofi
          +1
          April 4 2013 20: 50
          Quote: PiP
          under the general name "BREN" (for the appearance).

          except for the appearance ...
          Here's what they say about Type 73:

          adopted by the Armed Forces of the DPRK in 1973 and is used in the DPRK up to the present. Outside the DPRK, this sample is known very little. The concept of a dual-feed machine gun (magazine / tape) was probably borrowed from the Czechoslovak machine gun Vz.52, the general layout and arrangement of the main components was from the Soviet Kalashnikov PC machine gun.

          The Type 73 light machine gun uses gas exhaust automation, locking the barrel by turning the shutter. Fire is conducted from the open shutter, only in automatic mode. Air-cooled barrel, fast. The power supply is double - cartridges of original design with a capacity of 30 rounds inserted into the weapon from above can be used, or an unbroken metal tape with a closed link from a Kalashnikov machine gun PC. The machine gun is equipped with a wooden butt, a pistol grip and a folding metal bipod. Sights are shifted to the left of the axis of the weapon. A distinctive feature of the Type 73 light machine gun is the presence of interchangeable muzzle attachments that are screwed over the barrel in front of the gas block. The machine gun is equipped with two types of nozzles - one with a muzzle brake compensator in the front and the second with a tubular external guide for launching rifle grenades. One of the muzzle attachments is usually placed directly on the barrel, the second (currently unused) is mounted under the gas pipe of the machine gun.


          but Czech / Bren:

          The Bren light machine gun is an automatic air-cooled quick-change barrel weapon. Automation gas vent machine gun with a long stroke gas piston located under the barrel. The gas vent mechanism is equipped with a manual four-position regulator. The barrel is locked tilting the back of the shutter up. The ammunition is supplied from a 30-round ammunition box magazine attached to the top (for the Bren Mk.1 variant, 100-cartridge disk magazines were also produced, which were abandoned during the war because of their high cost), the spent cartridges are thrown down. The machine gun allowed the conduct of single and automatic fire, the fire mode translator is located on the left above the pistol grip. The design feature of the machine gun was that the receiver with the barrel and all the mechanisms had the ability to roll back along the long guides of the trigger mechanism relative to the stock, which reduced recoil and increased the stability of the weapon when firing.


          "slightly" different automatics - different machine guns. although the appearance is really confusing
          1. PiP
            +1
            April 4 2013 21: 01
            smprofi I agree completely. good Somewhere I came across infa that it (73) is used as a symbol of encouragement (like a "rolling Red Banner"), but I cannot vouch for it
    44. +1
      April 4 2013 20: 38
      In general, VO is a cool site. Fine!
    45. 0
      April 4 2013 20: 41
      I’m looking at Un and it’s like some kind of foreign object in these photos, as if photoshop had the same feeling as a flying saucer in my yard
    46. -1
      April 4 2013 20: 47
      Quote: BruderV
      Quote: tots
      The question is whether South Korea is ready for a protracted war

      The question is whether the DPRK is ready at all. In a couple of months, cannibalism will begin. If in peacetime, rice on coupons.


      DPRK is North Korea
      1. BruderV
        0
        April 4 2013 21: 18
        Quote: tots
        DPRK is North Korea

        What is the truth?
        1. -1
          April 4 2013 21: 39
          yeah in the DPRK live zombies guzzling each other, etc. ...

          Look further the western zombie ...
          1. BruderV
            +1
            April 4 2013 22: 11
            Quote: tots
            Look further the western zombie ...

            Do you get all the news first hand? Not one of these?
            1. 0
              April 4 2013 22: 18
              I receive the news from translations of the foreign press which is designed to brainwash the bourgeoisie and comparing it with reality. Well, I do not observe massive refugee camps in China, Russia and South Korea, only dissidents
              1. BruderV
                0
                April 4 2013 23: 01
                Well, of course, it’s not calm in the world, it’s better at home.

                or as
                http://www.rulez-t.info/foto_pics/11289-anti-amerikanskaya-propaganda-iz-severno
                j-korei.html
        2. -2
          April 4 2013 22: 05
          North Korea is ready to launch a nuclear strike against the United States ("BBCRussian.com", Great Britain) http://inosmi.ru/world/20130404/207689477.html

          Why the North Korean regime inspires fear ("CNN", USA) http://inosmi.ru/world/20130330/207540724.html

          it's probably they have nothing to eat so they fucking up by state

          PS do not forget to put a minus wink
          1. BruderV
            +2
            April 4 2013 22: 15
            Quote: tots
            do not forget to put a minus

            Well, there’s nothing more to do. Am I a shkolota chtoli? Not me minus.
            1. 0
              April 4 2013 22: 31
              per shkolota +
    47. nok01
      0
      April 4 2013 22: 09
      Poor country, poor people, what else can you say ....
    48. Hius-124
      0
      April 4 2013 22: 16
      Yeah ......... photo of how I visited the theater of the absurd, with naive midgets cast. Sorry for them, if that. These women with silly faces in 2 photos, the feeling - that this is not real, some kind of props. Beggars, holy believers, ready to die ... But this is our work, but we abandoned them, and now we betrayed !!!! request It’s even a shame. What are the chances there - NO! These children will simply die for the idea and on orders and EVERYTHING. crying Sad.
    49. satellite
      -1
      April 4 2013 22: 56
      They would be daredevil to a peaceful course, they are fanatics.
    50. Gray-haired777
      +3
      April 4 2013 23: 28
      Quote: Rubik
      If DPRK does not help China and Russia, then there is no chance. In the 50s they could not win

      In the 50th in June, for the first 3 days of fighting, the North Koreans occupied Seoul, and in 20 days of the war 90% of the territory of South Korea without the help of the USSR and China.

      Do not intervene the United States, there would be no country South Korea ...
      The Americans themselves fought and supplied arms to South Korea.
      And the whole of Western Europe helped the Americans, supposedly under the auspices of the UN.
      In the first months of intervention in the US war, they suffered heavy casualties in manpower and equipment.
      The Soviet Union began to help in October 1950 from the air.

      And the fact that the DPRK is a backward country is to blame for the United States ...
      Various kinds of economic sanctions, etc., do nothing good.

      The collapse of the USSR is also the work of the United States, the Cold War, the arms race, artificially lowering oil prices, etc.

      Moreover, the Americans themselves live duty. The US national debt is 17 trillion, and the total debt is over 100 trillion.
    51. 0
      April 5 2013 05: 31
      There will be no war on the Korean Peninsula, since the Americans do not need war, but rather the anticipation of war. This gives them a free hand in strengthening their troop groups in the Far East. And it helps keep China on its toes.
      1. Gluxar_
        0
        April 5 2013 11: 40
        Quote: Old Warrant Officer
        There will be no war on the Korean Peninsula, since the Americans do not need war, but rather the anticipation of war. This gives them a free hand in strengthening their troop groups in the Far East. And it helps keep China on its toes.

        In addition to American interests, there are other policies of power. On the Korean Peninsula, such a policy is the DPRK, next door is China. And these two countries put a big X on the Americans and their interests.
    52. nagi
      0
      April 5 2013 10: 09
      Quote: Odyssey
      Cattle stock
      in 1990-57 million. goals
      in 2012-20 million goals.

      Actually, in the 9s there was no money, there was nothing to feed the cattle and they were slaughtered in herds. The population itself didn’t have much to eat, so there’s no need for such examples.
    53. brush
      +1
      April 5 2013 23: 43
      The DPRK has been preparing one missile for a week, what kind of nuclear strike is there? Some people here live in the sixties, damn it. Back in 1991, how many missiles did Saddam Hussein launch at Tel Aviv? And what is the result?
      The States will roll out this DPRK in a week. They will first destroy air defense centers, then airfields and artillery regiments. Well, then they will start bombing cities. And who the hell makes a sound? And China won't give a damn. It itself depends on supplies to the USA and Europe.
      I’m generally silent about the ground forces of the DPRK. It will be like on Damansky Island in 1969. Crowds of soldiers will advance until they are covered by artillery, and everything ends in comedy.
    54. Shatea
      0
      29 March 2014 20: 59
      looks spectacular

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"