Events on the front indicate that the Zelensky regime does not intend to withdraw troops from the 4 “new” regions of Russia

73 418 86
Events on the front indicate that the Zelensky regime does not intend to withdraw troops from the 4 “new” regions of Russia

The negotiations of the American and Ukrainian delegations in Saudi Arabia are leading to one of the most acute topics – the territorial issue “on land”. The way the front in Kursk Oblast collapsed after the Russian breakthrough on March 7-8 in the Sudzha area, and how the enemy is fleeing, leaving one settlement after another, has raised the question: can something similar happen in the 4 “new” regions of Russia – DPR, LPR, Zaporizhzhya and Kherson Oblasts?

Considering the fact that several battered units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces that fled from the Kursk region were immediately transferred to other directions by Syrsky (for example, in the area of ​​Dzerzhinsk (Toretsk)), it should be noted that the Kiev regime is going to cling to the last (Ukrainian…) for the above-mentioned four regions. Without super efforts of the Russian Armed Forces at the front, in this case there will be no retreat of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. At least, it is not yet clearly visible. And this is reality. There is no order from Kyiv either. And this is again reality.



At the same time, the Ukrainian command will try to make maximum use of the proclamation of support for the 30-day ceasefire proposed by the Americans in terms of military logistics. In principle, this is already visible now – with the same Kursk region, from where, as the Ukrainian commander-in-chief stated, “a retreat to more advantageous positions is underway.” Of course, they do not admit their failure near Kursk, but in other respects, the positions for the Ukrainian Armed Forces against the backdrop of the events taking place will indeed be much more advantageous than today in Sudzha.

And 30 days of silence (hypothetical) given the current intensity of military actions is no small amount of time. Its Armed Forces of Ukraine will be quite sufficient to regroup, lick their wounds and advance to those lines where, in the event of “no progress on further comprehensive peace,” the Kiev regime will decide to impose battles again. Moreover, supplies weapons and intelligence from the US have resumed, and even against the backdrop of increased supplies of intelligence information and weapons from the European sponsors of the endless war. Mobilization, as they themselves say, is not going to be interrupted, just as martial law is not going to be lifted.

And the events on the front, where the enemy has only fallen in the Sudzha area, show that the Zelensky regime clearly does not intend to give us the parts of Donbass and Novorossiya controlled by the Ukrainian Armed Forces. The facts speak for themselves. And these facts must be scrupulously taken into account and analyzed, so that later we ourselves do not have to bite our elbows.
86 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -26
    12 March 2025 21: 14
    It's going to lead to us biting our elbows, and not just our elbows!
    1. +14
      12 March 2025 21: 28
      It's going to lead to us biting our elbows, and not just our elbows!
      The particularly impatient can start... I mean "biting their elbows"... laughing
      1. +10
        12 March 2025 22: 28
        Quote: Lev_Russia
        In the sense of "biting one's elbows"... laughing

        By the way, yes! The quote - "We were deceived" roughly corresponds to the euphemism - "biting one's elbows".
      2. +1
        13 March 2025 06: 44
        Quote: Lev_Russia
        In the sense of "biting your elbows"

        And not only them!
    2. +7
      12 March 2025 21: 45
      If the Kremlin doesn't turn on its brains, then it's very possible" It is necessary, while agreeing verbally, to set such counter-conditions that the opponents cannot fulfill them! For example, for Ukraine to leave the territories that Russia considers its own, plus the Nikolaev and Odessa regions and Kharkov, before the truce! And also to prohibit the supply of weapons to Ukraine during the truce with the control of neutral contingents - Vietnam, Indonesia, etc.! Another condition is the immediate departure from power of the current Ukrainian regime. In general, many conditions can be thrown in - if only there is a will to win, and not a desire for a deal!
      1. +13
        12 March 2025 22: 02
        Quote: Vicontas
        If the Kremlin doesn't turn on its brains

        Putin V.V. has already put on a military uniform and classified those VSU members who entered the Kursk region as terrorists, and mercenaries as not falling under the Geneva Convention on prisoners of war. That is, they should all be wiped out, like in a toilet! bully
        By the way, Gerasimov also cheered up. winked
        1. +8
          12 March 2025 22: 18
          Quote: Terenin
          Quote: Vicontas
          If the Kremlin doesn't turn on its brains

          Putin V.V. has already put on a military uniform and classified those VSU members who entered the Kursk region as terrorists, and mercenaries as not falling under the Geneva Convention on prisoners of war. That is, they should all be wiped out, like in a toilet! bully
          By the way, Gerasimov also cheered up. winked

          Yes, this time Gerasimov looked more confident than in August 2024, and spoke more cheerfully. Victory has many fathers.
          If we continue the offensive that began in Sudzha and break into Sumy Oblast on the shoulders of those retreating, then at the upcoming peace talks it will already be possible to raise the issue of de-occupation of five new regions. wink
          1. +3
            13 March 2025 09: 03
            Quote: Bearded
            Yes, this time Gerasimov looked more confident than in August 2024, and spoke more cheerfully. Victory has many fathers.

            Now, no matter how you look at it, logically with the current NGSh there should be a second act winked - selfless work as an assistant to Shoigu in the Security Council or as a rector (chief) of a military educational institution, or:
            "...- his ambassador to Tunisia!
            -Ah, why to Tunisia?
            -Where else would he... request " film "Election Day"
        2. +12
          12 March 2025 23: 10
          It seems that not only everyone is taken prisoner - a bullet to the forehead - bang
          1. +4
            13 March 2025 00: 01
            GREAT VIDEO! DEATH TO THE TRAITORS OF HOLY Rus'!!! IT'S A PITY THEY DON'T QUARTER THEM NOW, BUT THEY DON'T IMPOSE THEM. GOD'S PUNISHMENT HAS OCCURRED THE RUSSIANS! GOD BLESS OUR SOLDIERS!!! AMEN!
            1. +2
              13 March 2025 08: 23
              Quote: Rusich-Izhora
              GREAT VIDEO!

              What is this video colleague? Drop the link.
              Ah, here it is, it has opened...
              1. +2
                13 March 2025 08: 29
                Quote: Rusich-Izhora
                GREAT VIDEO!

                Well, it's clear here that the Ukrainians tripped over their own mines while retreating. winked
                Conclusion: I should have run faster from the shopping center earlier
      2. +11
        12 March 2025 22: 05
        Quote: Vicontas
        If the Kremlin doesn't turn on its brains, then it's very possible

        Don't doubt, they are included there, but you won't be informed. Read the media.
      3. +2
        12 March 2025 22: 44
        This is too much and no one will understand, but we need to brainwash people in a smart way
      4. -6
        12 March 2025 23: 03
        Quote: Vicontas
        If the Kremlin doesn't turn on its brains

        Is there anything to include there? If 3 years ago I would have answered this question in the affirmative, now...
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. 0
      13 March 2025 01: 06
      On the contrary.
      Events on the front indicate that the Zelensky regime does not intend to withdraw troops from the 4 “new” regions of Russia

      So "another deception of Putin" is postponed. So there is hope that Odessa and Kharkov and Nikolaev and Sumy, and maybe even further, will be part of the Russian Federation.
      1. -1
        13 March 2025 10: 46
        In order for this to happen, we need at least one more partial mobilization. And accordingly, the creation of new units and formations. And what to arm them with, if our military-industrial complex can’t even cope with replenishing the destroyed equipment?
  2. +7
    12 March 2025 21: 17
    And 30 days of silence (hypothetical)
    Hypothetically, the Skakly will capitulate tomorrow, leave Ukraine and self-liquidate... But this is only hypothetical... laughing
    1. kvv
      -15
      12 March 2025 21: 26
      Yes, they are annihilated, but these are the dreams of the Kremlin pink ponies, who are always deceived
    2. +8
      12 March 2025 22: 06
      Quote: Lev_Russia
      But this is only hypothetical..

      But in reality, the war continues, and the truce is for Trump and his rating in the US.
    3. +3
      12 March 2025 22: 20
      Quote: Lev_Russia
      And 30 days of silence (hypothetical)
      Hypothetically, the Skakly will capitulate tomorrow, leave Ukraine and self-liquidate... But this is only hypothetical... laughing

      In order to confirm this hypothesis, the Skaks would need to be hit with a lot of Russian shells, missiles and drones right on their heads. laughing
  3. +14
    12 March 2025 21: 20
    No, but someone expected that the enemy would present the occupied
    our territories on a silver platter? Naive people are as harmful as fools.
    1. +2
      12 March 2025 23: 07
      Quote: Volunteer Marek
      No, but someone expected that the enemy would present the occupied
      our territories are handed to them on a silver platter?

      Well, in 2022 we made a “gesture of goodwill”, so they think that the same (not quite obscene language) will make the same gesture. laughing
      1. -2
        13 March 2025 10: 49
        There was no gesture. They left Kyiv and the right bank of the Kherson region solely based on military expediency. Well, in the Kharkov region there was simply a disaster, a military one, it's good that the suckers didn't have Napoleons as commanders either.
        1. +1
          13 March 2025 11: 51
          Quote: Pioneer1984
          There was no gesture.

          Do you specifically need a link to Medinsky's quote here?
          1. -1
            13 March 2025 12: 00
            We need to separate the purported thugs in power from the reality of war.
            1. 0
              13 March 2025 12: 05
              Quote: Pioneer1984
              We need to separate the purported thugs in power from the reality of war.

              You have confused Medinsky with Peskov. Medinsky was the main negotiator at the time.
  4. kvv
    -11
    12 March 2025 21: 23
    Wow, that's news, and the Kremlin had such hopes
  5. K_4
    +7
    12 March 2025 21: 27
    If our people conclude a truce, it will be idiocy, super idiocy, if not outright betrayal.
    1. +4
      12 March 2025 23: 23
      Why should our people conclude this truce? Russia is gradually liberating territories from the Ukrops, so why is this truce necessary? Russia has absolutely no need for it.
  6. +6
    12 March 2025 21: 27
    Some kind of hastily thrown together article. Like pieces torn out from somewhere.
  7. -2
    12 March 2025 21: 39
    The main thing is yet to come, Washington is not the last resort and is not an authority.
  8. +1
    12 March 2025 21: 42
    With which Russian colleague did Waltz hold telephone conversations? bully Guess in one try. Witkoff is flying to Moscow after all.
    1. 0
      12 March 2025 22: 09
      Quote: tralflot1832
      With which Russian colleague did Waltz hold telephone conversations?

      Could it really be Peskov with Navka and Roma Abgamovich?
  9. +1
    12 March 2025 21: 42
    Well, naturally, they will cling to the parts of our new regions that are still under their control... It is clear that no one, from the West, including the Trump administration, is interested in ending this meat grinder, and as long as there are Ukrainians who can "harm" Russia, they will be equipped with everything necessary and driven to fight the Russians. It is already clear that we should not count on any negotiations with the Americans, and even more so - we will not agree to the temporary truce that is being forced upon us, naturally, especially now, when the initiative is completely on our side, when the enemy is retreating in all directions, and not as stated in the article, by the way...
    There will be no temporary truce in general... until we reach the constitutional borders of the new regions... And then, we will see under what conditions favorable to us, we will agree to stop and not go further...
  10. +11
    12 March 2025 21: 43
    Why is the word "new" in the title of the article and in the text written with quotation marks? Author of the publication, whose side are you on, do you doubt that they are Russian?
    1. +6
      12 March 2025 23: 11
      Quote: sergey4791
      Why is the word "new" in the title of the article and in the text written with quotation marks?

      I can't speak for the author, but I assume that the point is that they are not as new as you can read in any adequate history textbook.
  11. +8
    12 March 2025 21: 47
    What an interesting thing is happening, looking at the incoming news, it seems like the drug gang is now deliberately doing everything to make Russia send everyone to hell with this truce. They are loudly declaring that they will only step up mobilization, that they will build defensive lines at an emergency pace, and so on. Now information has come in that they are introducing a complete ban on the use of the Russian language... In general, they are openly doing exactly what is needed to ensure that Russia definitely does not agree to this truce. Isn't it these instructions that the drug addict received from the "Englishwoman"? After all, it was the Brits who so did not want the Ukrop to jump out of this slaughter and fight to the last Ukrop.
  12. +6
    12 March 2025 21: 50
    Ι have repeatedly warned of Trumps trump.Now that it is discovered.we are fallen in being threatned and blackmailed
  13. -10
    12 March 2025 21: 51
    [/quote]... endless war...[quote]
    Yes, yes, at this rate we will be fighting for another 10 years. How many more guys do we need to lay down for "fulfilling the goals of the SVO"? A hundred thousand, half a million? And what will these "liberated territories" give us in strategic terms? Will the Finns and Swedes leave NATO? China will flood us with investments and such a rapid growth of the Russian economy will begin that we will not even notice the reduction of the state budget by hundreds of billions of dollars spent on the restoration of new territories.
    1. +4
      12 March 2025 22: 26
      Do not forget that these territories are inhabited by Russian-speaking people who voted for joining the Russian Federation, these lands are rich not only in mineral resources, but also in arable land. Therefore, in strategic terms, they are priceless.
      1. 0
        13 March 2025 08: 29
        When did these people living in the territory controlled by Ukraine, in the same Pokrovsk, Slavyansk, Kramatorsk... manage to vote for joining the Russian Federation, and most importantly, Where and How?
    2. -1
      12 March 2025 23: 03
      Quote: golen
      ... endless war...
      Yes, yes, at this rate we will be fighting for another 10 years. How many more guys do we need to lay down for "fulfilling the goals of the SVO"? A hundred thousand, half a million? And what will these "liberated territories" give us in strategic terms? Will the Finns and Swedes leave NATO? China will flood us with investments and such a rapid growth of the Russian economy will begin that we will not even notice the reduction of the state budget by hundreds of billions of dollars spent on the restoration of new territories.

      Hello, no need to whine about difficulties
    3. +1
      13 March 2025 00: 54
      The main object of operations is not the territory, but the enemy army and its ability to resist.
  14. +4
    12 March 2025 22: 02
    Based on how the front in the Kursk region collapsed after the Russian breakthrough on March 7-8 in the Sudzha area,
    The front is cracking at the seams everywhere, so Trump and his comrades decided to create a "truce" for 30 days. In a month, "bring to mind" the Armed Forces of Ukraine, strengthen the defense of the Sumy region and "again into battle for Trump!"
  15. -7
    12 March 2025 22: 10
    I bet that Putin will approve the truce, and that would be right, if bookmakers were accepting bets on this I would definitely put money...
    1. +1
      12 March 2025 22: 23
      It was spent on money. Let's do it right here. You say the time frame when that "ceasefire approval" will happen. Well, in a week, a month. I'll remember this and we'll check how well you can predict.)
      1. +2
        12 March 2025 22: 26
        Trump said here that a grand event will happen on April 2nd, I think he meant a truce, well, it will start somewhere around April 2nd, well, maybe Putin will move the date a little, but I don’t think it will be later than mid-April, that’s my forecast...
        1. +1
          12 March 2025 22: 30
          Let's clarify so that there are no misunderstandings. Do you think that the truce will be concluded in mid-April? Is that correct?
          1. 0
            12 March 2025 22: 31
            I think not later, maybe earlier, maybe the 2nd or 3rd...
            1. 0
              12 March 2025 22: 32
              So the truce will be concluded BEFORE mid-April? Is everything certain now?
              1. +1
                12 March 2025 22: 34
                Yes, that's right, I don't think they'll manage it any earlier, with the approvals and responsibilities of the parties...
                1. +4
                  12 March 2025 22: 36
                  Great. Let's check.
                  WELL, and now my remark. I liked the phrase: Trump said here that a grand event will happen on April 4, (C) I remembered his phrase: US President Donald Trump announced a "grand evening" on March XNUMX, when he will tell "everything as it is." "Tomorrow evening will be grand. I will tell everything as it is!" - he wrote on the social network Truth Social. (C) Can you remember what grand thing he said?)
                  1. 0
                    12 March 2025 22: 42
                    commenting on Trump's statements is generally a thankless thing, I just latched onto his phrase as a starting point, it is clear that this may be empty air shaking, or maybe not, but the fact is that they did persuade Zelensky to a truce, although until recently he did not even want to talk, with Putin of course it is more difficult but still Trump's statements that Putin wants peace are not an empty phrase and the meeting in Saudi Arabia was also assessed as positive, so I do not see any obstacles to achieving a truce, especially since Putin invited Trump to May 9, it is unlikely that he would invite the US President if the conflict was not resolved at least in the form of a truce....
                    1. +2
                      12 March 2025 22: 45
                      That is, Trump's previous statements, to put it another way, you do not take into account. After all, there was an even more important starting point: I can stop the conflict in 24 hours (c) But this phrase about April 2 is definitely serious? An interesting logical construction.
                      1. +1
                        12 March 2025 22: 47
                        as they say, what we have is what we have, I judge not by Trump's statements as the ultimate truth, but by the unfolding events that I simply tie to this statement, and we'll see how it turns out in reality, but I have a high degree of confidence in the correctness of my guesses...
                      2. -1
                        12 March 2025 22: 49
                        Well, it's not a long wait) just a month.
    2. 0
      12 March 2025 23: 08
      Of course he will approve, where else will he go? But on conditions that will definitely not suit the entire Western gang. Thus sending the proverbial ball to their side. And all this time the SVO will continue.
    3. +1
      13 March 2025 08: 24
      I think you are right. The Istanbul negotiations of 2022 are an example of this. And... Roma Abramovich, the great prisoner exchange mediator, has appeared again, offering his services for a new exchange according to the formula 2000 for 2000. And this is only the beginning of his "peace initiatives".
  16. +2
    12 March 2025 22: 13
    Quote: carpenter
    Waltz negotiations.
    Watch Russian news! wassat
    1. +1
      12 March 2025 23: 13
      here is the question of the VVP - "we need to think, I would ask you to think, in the future about creating a security zone along the state border" - and then what kind of truce...
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. +3
    12 March 2025 22: 21
    They will never abandon positions where we have not yet defeated them, that is as clear as day. After the failure of the Ankara talks, everyone knows that everything will be decided on the battlefield. What victory looks like now depends on Putin, on the outcome of the current negotiations with the US. I think he can agree to stop forever on the current line of fire in four new regions, and of course the clown will not have to join NATO. But the most difficult thing he will have to decide in the negotiations is the question of what kind of NATO military aid to Kyiv Russia will accept.
  19. -2
    12 March 2025 22: 28
    How to identify a foreign mercenary who has surrendered? Ask how "polenica" sounds in the language?
  20. +4
    12 March 2025 22: 40
    In England they are very unhappy about this. And they also accuse us of forcing them to close the English embassy in Moscow. (Which will lead to catastrophic consequences, which they do not explain! bully)
    1. -1
      13 March 2025 00: 53
      Andrey S. - and do you seriously believe these comments?
  21. +1
    12 March 2025 22: 42
    And it will not be taken out peacefully
    At least until Zelensky leaves
    1. +1
      12 March 2025 23: 18
      Quote: Oleg Telpes
      At least until Zelensky leaves

      After his departure, nothing will change here either, or does anyone think that Poroshenko, Tymoshenko and other Nazis will do this when they come to power.
  22. +4
    12 March 2025 22: 55
    I wonder... what is the motivation of those who started to say/write that everything is lost! That everything has already been agreed upon and they will have to "bite their elbows" again?
    Just to express your most valuable opinion?
    Well, that's exactly how most of us here like to do it... that's about the "most valuable"...
    However, expressing concern... alas, it is not much different from anything else.
    Alas and alack, our chatterbox is very much inclined to this! wink
  23. +2
    12 March 2025 22: 57
    Quote: Skobaristan
    just a month.
    Sorry, but Trump made a grand speech in Congress in both chambers, solving the internal problems of the USA, but in no way solving the problems of Russia. So for the mood, was this possible before in NYP?
  24. +1
    12 March 2025 23: 05
    Ukraine doesn’t need any ceasefire, they want to fight.
    Russia does not need any ceasefire, it does not want to fight, but in the current reality there is no point in stopping military actions.
    They are not satisfied with what we propose, we are not satisfied with what they propose. But the khokhols are not going to give up, they still have a lot of strength.
    And who needs all this? Trump personally?
    Well, we'll see how he does it.
  25. +1
    12 March 2025 23: 14
    now I'm going to give a course on HOW TO RULE THE RUSSIAN STATE))))) all specialists are at the level of president)))))
  26. +2
    12 March 2025 23: 20
    Quote: BrTurin
    I need to think about it, I would ask you to think about it, in the future about creating a security zone along the state border
    The question is of course interesting, how will this look? Here, macaroni is getting in the way with its calls for security guarantees for Ukraine.
  27. -3
    12 March 2025 23: 57
    We must agree to an April Easter truce. On the condition that in April the Banderites leave all constitutional territories of the Russian Federation. They will definitely not leave and we must continue from May, accusing the Europeans and the Banderites of disrupting the peace process.
    We need a break too. The question is who needs it more.
  28. +1
    12 March 2025 23: 59
    Just three or four years ago, reasonable people told Uncle Vova that a violinist (a filthy pianist) was not needed. . .Kyu! . . hi
  29. -2
    13 March 2025 00: 01
    A step of ill will
    https://news-front.su/2025/03/12/shag-nedobroj-voli/
  30. 0
    13 March 2025 03: 09
    we need to make counter demands... - to these 4 regions it is MANDATORY to add Nikolaev and Odessa (such a worthless "state" does not need access to the sea at all, and the passage to Transnistria is desperately needed), and as a bonus - another 3 regions, from which, if they put pressure - it would be possible to give in... but most likely you will not wait for this from the orcs - they will cling to the last, and you will support them in this (it is not for nothing that their agroholdings frantically bought up the lands of Khokhlostana - they ALREADY consider these lands theirs)
  31. +1
    13 March 2025 05: 11
    Send them to hell with their 30-day regime.
  32. +1
    13 March 2025 05: 12
    Quote: K_4
    If ours conclude a truce, it will be idiocy, super idiocy, if not outright betrayal.

    Depends on what conditions. Everything that has been said is just general words.
  33. 0
    13 March 2025 08: 50
    Events on the front indicate that the Zelensky regime does not intend to withdraw troops from the 4 “new” regions of Russia

    Only the cleansing of the entire territory of the Ukrainian Reich will bring peace to the region, all other options are a postponed war, but only with the EU and NATO
  34. 0
    13 March 2025 15: 32
    Events on the front indicate that the Zelensky regime does not intend to withdraw troops from the 4 “new” regions of Russia

    Did anyone really have any different expectations?
    What is the article about? what
  35. 0
    13 March 2025 19: 49
    Surprisingly, I have the same impression.
  36. 0
    14 March 2025 20: 41
    We need not four regions, but seven, as a minimum.
  37. 0
    16 March 2025 21: 20
    events on the front, where the enemy has only suffered losses in the Sudzha area, indicate that the Zelensky regime clearly does not intend to give us the parts of Donbass and Novorossiya controlled by the Ukrainian Armed Forces


    Ukrainians They are not fools either, they see that for three years we have been standing on the same line of the LBS, plus or minus 30-20 km. For three years there has not been a single attack on a broad front from Russia. Which gives the enemy room to maneuver. Why is the West for continuing the war? Because such a war suits the West. This is a depletion of Russia's resources. For every one tank destroyed, the West has come three. For 50 states fighting against Russia, this is not a problem...
    1. 0
      Yesterday, 21: 31
      Well, somehow the events of the last months "slightly" refute your version. Considering that the attack had to be carried out through previously fortified (long-standing) positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
      Moreover, let's imagine for a moment, March 1943. Paulus has just capitulated. We are still on the Volga. Someone like you popped up with a publication in the same style. Like, we've been fighting for the third year, and we haven't even advanced towards Berlin, we've even retreated. And then - the conclusion: well, to hell with it, with Ukraine, look how long it takes to get there from the Volga. And also to liberate it. And to force the Dnieper. Or maybe it would be better to come to an agreement...
      And below for those who disagree: who is there for continuing the war? You are welcome to the military registration and enlistment office.
      How do you like this historical parallel?
    2. 0
      Yesterday, 21: 36
      Ukrainians aren't fools either,
      ///////
      I'm afraid to disappoint you, but to a certain extent, alternatively gifted people are a fact. Well, that is, if they were "not fools" they wouldn't have fallen for American cookies. They wouldn't have brought the country to a comatose state with a destroyed infrastructure and a wiped out population. I hope that's clearer))
  38. 0
    Yesterday, 21: 20
    Well, if our regions are not recognized as ours, then who is driving us to the negotiating table? And no one forced our tongues (I mean, "we're all for it"). We'll have to continue fighting, but then our subsequent demands will be tougher than the current ones.