Agree to 30-day truce, but on condition: American channel "gave advice" to Russian president

163 564 85
Agree to 30-day truce, but on condition: American channel "gave advice" to Russian president

The culmination of yesterday's US-Ukrainian talks in Saudi Arabia was a joint statement on the need for an immediate suspension of hostilities for at least 30 days with the possibility of extension.

Now, as Kyiv and Washington believe, "the ball has been thrown" to Russia. At the same time, it would be extremely disadvantageous for our country to agree to a temporary truce, since the latter would dampen the powerful offensive impulse of the Russian Armed Forces and at the same time give the Ukrainian Armed Forces the opportunity to regroup and strengthen their positions.



It is likely that Ukraine and the US are counting on Moscow’s refusal of the proposed measure in order to then accuse Russia of disrupting the diplomatic process.

In turn, the American Telegram channel Kalibrated, which is sympathetic to our country, calls on the Russian president to agree to a 30-day truce, but at the same time put forward counter-conditions.

Firstly, as the author of the channel advises, Vladimir Putin should demand that presidential elections be held in Ukraine within the above-mentioned period. Secondly, during this time the Ukrainian Armed Forces should leave the occupied territories of the four regions that have joined Russia.

Ultimately, the author of the post believes that Kyiv will most likely at least refuse to hold elections. But if Zelensky agrees to withdraw troops, since territorial concessions are already being discussed in the US, then Russia will benefit from stopping its offensive.

If the Kiev regime flatly refuses both conditions, then this will demonstrate its inability to negotiate, and Russia will lose nothing, continuing to systematically destroy the Ukrainian Armed Forces and liberate its territory.
85 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +28
    12 March 2025 19: 01
    In turn, the American Telegram channel Kalibrated, which is sympathetic to our country, calls on the Russian president to agree to a 30-day truce, but at the same time put forward counter-conditions.

    The conditions were put forward a year ago.

    1. +16
      12 March 2025 19: 20
      The conditions were put forward a year ago.

      Everything depends on one person, Putin will do as he wants, regardless of what he said before.
      1. +8
        12 March 2025 20: 13
        In turn, the American Telegram channel Kalibrated, which is sympathetic to our country, calls on the Russian president to agree to a 30-day truce, but at the same time put forward counter-conditions.
        This is advice to become like the Skakly and the Am... Russia has never done this, maybe that's why it remained Russia... A unique country for the whole world...
      2. +2
        13 March 2025 13: 14
        Quote: Ludoman
        Everything depends on one person, Putin will do as he wants, regardless of what he said before.

        He has already responded by visiting the Kursk region in military uniform and giving the command not only to clear the entire region of fascists, but also to create a buffer zone in the Sumy region. It would be better to take the entire Sumy region as a buffer.
      3. 0
        13 March 2025 17: 59
        Good health to all.
        "Putin will do as he pleases"
        Putin, "the hero of not my novel", but he understands reality, which is not the case with Zelensky. He lives in an illusory world
    2. 0
      12 March 2025 19: 32
      Putin spoke a year ago about the conditions under which a ceasefire could be established

      Well, Putin is the master of his word. lol
    3. +3
      12 March 2025 20: 13
      A year ago it was a year ago, now the situation is different
    4. +3
      12 March 2025 23: 56
      Comrade Beria
      Today, 19: 01
      The conditions were put forward a year ago.
      Memory tablet.
      Putin spoke a year ago about the conditions under which a ceasefire could be established

      hi We can remind the penguins and the little Brits - the main initiators and instigators of the massacre in Bandera, in October-November 2021, when the Russian Federation put forward peace initiatives and several drafts of the Treaty on National and Collective Security of the Russian Federation, Gayrope, which the false Under-West rejected, as well as the root causes of the beginning of the NWO, which was repeatedly repeated by the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry S. Lavrov. soldier
    5. +4
      13 March 2025 17: 15
      Yes, one condition is enough - lifting the ban on leaving Saloreikh for any category of citizens. Absolutely anyone, including the military. You'll see, in 30 days there will be no one left there at all.
  2. +19
    12 March 2025 19: 02
    calls on the Russian president to agree to a 30-day truce, but to put forward counter-conditions

    In my opinion, the Supreme Commander announced all the conditions last year:
    The Ukrainian Armed Forces are leaving the territory of Russia (new regions);
    denazification;
    demilitarization;
    non-aligned status;
    respect for the rights of Russian speakers;
    freedom of religion.
    1. +24
      12 March 2025 19: 30
      Tell me honestly, hand on heart: we all want to believe that this is how it will be, right? But I feel anxious at the moment. I am chasing away my thoughts, but I am a little skeptical, what if they change their minds and make concessions? They will call it a compromise solution, after all, it is possible to play it out beautifully. Then TV will join in, where "experts" of all stripes will say that this is a brilliant decision and that it is beneficial to us. Oh, how I want to be wrong in my doubts.
      1. +13
        12 March 2025 19: 38
        I completely agree. What you wrote seems to be in the minds of the overwhelming majority.
      2. Aag
        -2
        12 March 2025 19: 50
        [quote=Usual]Tell me honestly, hand on heart: we all want to believe that this is how it will be, right? But I feel anxious at the moment. I'm chasing my thoughts, but I'm a little skeptical, what if they replay and make concessions? They'll call it a compromise solution, after all, it's possible to play it out beautifully. Then TV will join in, where "experts" of all stripes will say that this is a brilliant decision and that it's beneficial to us. Oh, how I want to be wrong in my doubts.
        "...Oh, how I want to be wrong in my doubts...".
        The same situation. And the saddest thing is, - for how many years now... When did it start (doubt), - let's remember together... While I sleep, it's time, - Suddenly war, - and we're tired! ((((.
    2. +3
      12 March 2025 19: 39
      Quote: Andrey K
      In my opinion, the Supreme Commander announced all the conditions last year.

      He voiced a lot of things
      1. -7
        12 March 2025 20: 27
        Only a complete idiot or a mentally retarded person does not understand that the retirement age will be raised, and soon it will be raised to 70 years, or even 72. And they will do it like in all countries, they will equalize men and women.
        1. 0
          13 March 2025 14: 39
          Well, it won't reach 70 yet, but it's quite possible to reach 67. 5 pensioners for every working person is too many.
          1. -1
            14 March 2025 00: 11
            That's right! No Russian man should live to see retirement! Everyone should kick the bucket at their place of service!
      2. -3
        13 March 2025 10: 20
        He voiced a lot of things

        Oh, do they still use the manual about retirement age?
  3. +14
    12 March 2025 19: 03
    Now, as they believe in Kyiv and Washington, “the ball has been thrown” to Russia’s side.
    They are serious about this. fool
    Well, screw such proposals, because there’s no point in stepping on the same OLD RAKE!
    1. +1
      12 March 2025 19: 12
      This is the dirty trick. If Russia refuses to cease fire, then a unanimous howl will rise "Russia is against peace initiatives". And everyone will be "turned against" it. Even neutral countries now. It is very possible that Xi's friend will join them... hi
      1. +3
        12 March 2025 19: 32
        But there was no howling before. Why should Xi change his position (Trump has stopped considering China the main threat), and what is neutral about this noise - most of them have the syndrome of waiting - when it becomes clear who has finally won, then they will show their position, but for now it is both ours and yours... especially since Trump with his policies (especially tariffs) adds instability - those who are waiting see that the West is far from united, and there is a desire to see how all this will turn out in the States themselves... someone may say something verbally, but it is unlikely that they will act... for now everything depends on the form of the response
        1. +1
          12 March 2025 19: 39
          So far, there hasn't been a question. And Xi has already said that negotiations without the EU and China would be "wrong" and he is ready to give up friendship with his brothers forever for economic preferences in Europe. China is looking for benefits everywhere. It is more interested in being friends with Europe than with Russia... hi
          1. +1
            12 March 2025 19: 44
            Quote: ian
            I am ready to trade friendship with my brothers forever for economic preferences in Europe.

            Trump will not change his attitude towards China and will act in this direction (in principle, like anyone else - for the States it has become a matter of principle, too strong a competitor), and being friends with Europe against the States is quite a strategy...
            1. -2
              12 March 2025 20: 30
              Recently, China's special envoy for European affairs, Lu Shaye, said he was "shocked" by the way President Donald Trump treated American allies in Europe, adding that a peace agreement on Ukraine should not be determined by the United States and Russia alone. In other words, China is essentially openly proposing an alliance to Europe against the United States. The Chinese do not care about Russia's opinion in this case - they do not benefit from ending the military conflict in Ukraine, since in that case China will be the main focus of the United States' attention.
      2. +1
        12 March 2025 20: 15
        Quote: ian
        This is the dirty trick. If Russia refuses to cease fire, then a unanimous howl will rise "Russia is against peace initiatives". And everyone will be "turned against" it. Even neutral countries now. It is very possible that Xi's friend will join them... hi

        In general, the comment is correct, but with a small (large) exception - Xi will not join these obscurantists and under all circumstances will observe if not a friendly, then a neutral status. Beijing will not go openly against Russia because it has a period of great confrontation with the same collective West looming on the horizon and losing an ally from which it can receive up to 80% of all necessary resources is extremely short-sighted.
      3. +3
        12 March 2025 20: 21
        "friend" Xi will not speak out...otherwise the PRC will be left alone, and as warriors the Chinese are so-so...they look beautiful at parades - that's the only thing that can be said
        1. +2
          12 March 2025 20: 35
          Quote: Ovsigovets
          As warriors, the Chinese are so-so.

          But as traders they are great. And believe me, if they are offered to exchange the Russian market for perks on the European one, they will not be tormented by the choice for long... hi
          1. +2
            12 March 2025 20: 51
            but not idiots....."life hangs by a thread, but thinks about profit" (C)
      4. 0
        12 March 2025 20: 45
        It has already been written here that after the announcement of a ceasefire, some peacekeeping contingent may be brought into the territory of Ukraine, presenting the Russian leadership with a fait accompli. In addition, the ceasefire is now extremely advantageous for the Ukrainian side, for the redeployment of its units and the creation of a line of new fortifications. The problem is that the Kremlin is ready to step on the Istanbul rake again.
        1. +1
          13 March 2025 07: 02
          And why did you decide that it was ready?
          1. 0
            13 March 2025 07: 56
            Yesterday I watched Channel 1 Russia. And Putin's statement that Kyiv should lift the ban on negotiations with the Russian Federation. And I don't see that Putin needs a victory in this war. The entire SVO is waiting for some negotiations.
            1. +1
              13 March 2025 11: 43
              You don't even know what the negotiations are about, but you draw conclusions.
      5. -3
        12 March 2025 21: 59
        It is very possible that Xi's friend will join them....

        half a billion "ni hao" with copies of AK
        they'll come out of the pipe somewhere
        in Transbaikalia.
        No joke, they are overpopulated
      6. 0
        12 March 2025 22: 10
        Comrade Xi has his own very strong motivation that does not turn sideways towards Russia or anything else... they talked/discussed/argued about this more than once or twice, and nothing has changed, and nothing can change in the foreseeable future.
        Whose opinion is important, significant for us? There are not many such countries and they are "themselves with a mustache", to fall for the hysteria, the scam from the striped/impudent/gay Europeans... no, no, they will step into the shadows for a while and watch how the hysterics and swindlers break their teeth on us...
      7. -1
        13 March 2025 04: 54
        Aren't you tired of living such a secondary life and always looking into the mouth of the White Master? And what will they think, what will they say? I don't care. Personally, I don't care about the howling in the Anglo-Saxon swamps... I would even look at their squeal.
        1. -1
          13 March 2025 17: 14
          Quote: Totor5
          Aren't you tired of living such a secondary life and always looking into the mouth of the White Master? And what will they think, what will they say? I don't care. Personally, I don't care about the howling in the Anglo-Saxon swamps... I would even look at their squeal.

          1. What is being discussed here is not my life, but a political game between the Russian Federation and the USA.
          2. Your personal heroism and careless attitude towards the howling in the swamps will undoubtedly be noted at the highest level. hi
          1. -1
            13 March 2025 21: 15
            1) You write your opinion on a public resource, so both your words and you will be discussed here.
            2) My opinion is part of public opinion, which is undoubtedly taken into account at the highest level. The people are silent - this is not about me.
            1. -1
              13 March 2025 21: 34
              1. Discussing a person based on your fantasies about him is the lot of stupid gossips.
              2. According to your logic, my opinion is as much a part of public opinion as yours. Please take this into account, since it is taken into account even at the highest level. hi
              1. -1
                13 March 2025 22: 55
                1) I just made a conclusion from your words. If you don't like discussions or, as you say, gossip...you can not only not write on forums, but also not read Telegram.
                2) And I didn't forbid you to have your own opinion, I expressed my opinion about yours. So take this into account.
      8. 0
        13 March 2025 07: 53
        What kind of howl will we raise?)
        Russia is currently at war with the Nazi regime?! And neutral countries are neutral because all these 3 years we have been marking time. If we decide to fight, we need to act accordingly, and not advance negotiations every 2 months. Then the enemies will end and allies will appear. And let the "neutrals" remain as such. They do not interfere
      9. +1
        13 March 2025 12: 05
        Quote: ian
        and friend Xi will join them....

        Friend Xi needs to think about his own war, he himself has a war on the horizon. Including an economic one, which by the way is already in full swing. If the States themselves do not directly get involved in an armed conflict, then there is Japan, South Korea, the Philippines at worst, which have long been sharpened against China. And so it is good. If your citizens and soldiers do not die, then of course you can play "peacekeepers".
    2. +1
      13 March 2025 03: 33
      "I don't give a damn about such proposals"
    3. 0
      13 March 2025 10: 05
      "The ball has been thrown" to Russia's side.
      only it's not a football, it's a rugby ball. And the rules of rugby are tough...
      1. -1
        13 March 2025 11: 29
        There's plenty of everything in life... alas, even the worst.
        But that's not what we're talking about. We have a goal, a task, and we'll stand for it until victory!
  4. +19
    12 March 2025 19: 06
    The answer now should be very simple. No answer. Because you need to answer a question or a proposal, and no one has asked us anything or proposed anything yet
  5. +8
    12 March 2025 19: 08
    ...American TG channel Kalibrated

    Oddly enough, the reasoning is quite correct and adequate.
  6. +12
    12 March 2025 19: 08
    The Stars and Stripes started a proxy war in Ukraine, and now they demand something from us. What steps have they taken to stop the war??? Why should everyone bow down to them??? The latest news only confirms that they cannot be trusted.
    1. kvv
      -5
      12 March 2025 19: 24
      And it is Putin's own fault when he agreed a month ago that our enemy, the States, would be the mediators in this deal. You have to be completely inadequate to agree to that.
      1. +4
        12 March 2025 19: 32
        The United States must be in these negotiations as the main participant in the conflict and bear full responsibility for everything.
        1. kvv
          -1
          12 March 2025 20: 52
          Well, I'm talking about the same thing, and Putin agreed that the States are a mediator, and in fact an arbitrator
          1. 0
            12 March 2025 20: 54
            So I completely agree with you and gave two comments a plus.
    2. +1
      12 March 2025 19: 33
      You are afraid that all your mines will be taken away by Russia. Together with the forelocked gnomes, for digging these mines.
  7. +1
    12 March 2025 19: 21
    I completely agree, but I didn't think about the elections. Zelensky has clung to his throne like a tick and will definitely not do something like that. But it's logical: we don't recognize a clown as legitimate, so let's hold elections for a new president during the truce.
    And we will think about whether to recognize it or not.
  8. +6
    12 March 2025 19: 21
    There is an alternative option - to spend the next six months considering the option offered to us, but in this case, military actions on our part will not stop for a second.
  9. +4
    12 March 2025 19: 26
    The demand from Russia must be strengthened, in addition to the regions already included in Russia according to the Constitution, the Armed Forces of Ukraine are leaving the Kharkov, Sumy, Chernigov, Odessa, Nikolaev, Dnepropetrovsk regions.... holding elections for their president and securing all this with an agreement with Russia, disbanding their army and refusing to join NATO with amendments to the Constitution... otherwise you and Trump will be chucked.
    1. -1
      12 March 2025 21: 25
      Quote from Silver99
      The Ukrainian Armed Forces are leaving the Kharkiv, Sumy, Chernihiv, Odessa, Nikolaev, and Dnepropetrovsk regions...

      There are no grounds for this yet. First, they need to hold referendums on their own independence, and only then on their accession to the Russian Federation.
  10. +14
    12 March 2025 19: 26
    As for me, and this is my personal opinion, it would be better to be blamed by 404 or the States than to be blamed by our own army. I am almost XNUMX% sure that many in the army will not understand such a course of events. After all, such a decision will be considered not as common sense, but as treason.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      12 March 2025 20: 30
      par votre propre armée..et par le peuple!
    3. 0
      13 March 2025 16: 09
      Why won't the army understand that the Armed Forces will leave Russian territory voluntarily? They will definitely have to fight for them for more than a month.
  11. +5
    12 March 2025 19: 27
    I would add two more conditions to this:
    A complete cessation of military supplies to Ukraine from anywhere, and the deployment of Russian units at all points through which this aid can be delivered, for control.
  12. +3
    12 March 2025 19: 33
    It’s a pity that VO doesn’t write about all the offers of all TG channels around the world, in all countries!
  13. 0
    12 March 2025 19: 35
    In principle, the proposal is not bad, but it must be supplemented with the rest of Russia's previously voiced demands, indicating that if they are not met, Russia will resume military actions immediately after the 30-day period has expired. In addition, any arms deliveries to Ukraine must be stopped during this period. Russia will monitor this through its representatives in Ukrainian ports and railways, and at airports. If their activities are obstructed, Russia will resume military actions immediately.
    1. 0
      13 March 2025 16: 13
      And the withdrawal from the border regions should be planned. So that it doesn't turn out that after 28 days the Ukrainians are standing in the same place, like there are still 2 days left.
  14. +2
    12 March 2025 19: 35
    The offer is certainly flattering, but you can’t trust the Ukrainians, they’ll deceive their own mother.
    Russian - goes to the end (designated goals of the SVO). hi
  15. +2
    12 March 2025 19: 36
    The Ukrainian Armed Forces are retreating from the Kursk region anyway, the Americans themselves are seeking a change of president. That is, to rake in the heat once again with someone else's hands negative
  16. +1
    12 March 2025 19: 37
    Still, the situation shows that the Russian Federation will have to go, or rather, walk for some time..., along the North Korean path...
    In the sense of a tough and open confrontation - with the "incorrigible", collective West...
    (Having completely cleared out the fifth column, of course...)
    Confrontation that excludes any concessions...
    Confrontations on the brink of a BIG War...

    Iran, Cuba, North Korea - they've been through this...
    But these are far from the most powerful countries in military and political terms...
  17. +3
    12 March 2025 20: 02
    His name is "Captain Obvious"? When the enemy's conditions are unacceptable, you have to put forward your own unacceptable conditions, and much more unacceptable ones.
  18. +3
    12 March 2025 20: 05
    and what, quite sound reasoning, like if we are offered a deliberately unfavorable offer precisely so that we would refuse, then we should not refuse, we should agree, but put forward our own, also impossible conditions, and now we are white and fluffy, and we can play this ping pong endlessly
  19. 0
    12 March 2025 20: 08
    It is rightly said that with such “friends” as this American Telegram channel Kalibrated, which “sympathizes” with Russia, there is no need for enemies.
  20. +1
    12 March 2025 20: 36
    There is a proposal that captivates with its novelty and originality - it is, simply, WAIT... Just a little bit.. Soon it will be clear what Donald Fredovich has "prepared" for us and what, as a "salverdi", our Supreme will say... And then, we will "clash" in conclusions, analyses and other political "crap"....
  21. +1
    12 March 2025 21: 02
    In principle, I thought about the same counter-conditions...
  22. BAI
    +3
    12 March 2025 21: 12
    Firstly, as the author of the channel advises, Vladimir Putin should demand that presidential elections be held in Ukraine within the above-mentioned period. Secondly, during this time the Ukrainian Armed Forces should leave the occupied territories of the four regions that have joined Russia.

    Not certainly in that way.
    1. Elections before negotiations. All negotiations are with the legitimate authorities.
    2. Transfer of historical territories and Odessa, Nikolaev, Kharkov, Dnepropetrovsk and Kiev regions under the control of Russia.
    3. Cancellation of the tomos and restrictions on the Russian language
  23. ric
    +1
    12 March 2025 22: 43
    At first they will agree, even give their teeth, then they will send you away, the agreements of 2014, 2022 were violated, and the same fate awaits them.
  24. 0
    13 March 2025 00: 00
    Enough secondly. The first condition is obviously impossible to fulfill, not serious. But the second is quite feasible. If it is not fulfilled, we must continue.
  25. 0
    13 March 2025 03: 03
    The "mouse fight" began - who will deceive whom on promises. The "partners" went for a second round.
  26. +2
    13 March 2025 04: 57
    As a gesture of goodwill, let them withdraw troops from Kherson and other territories of ours. Then we can discuss...
  27. 0
    13 March 2025 07: 42
    If the Kyiv regime flatly refuses both conditions,...
    ///////
    No, he won't refuse. He'll say that he'll do everything exactly as we demand. But the trick is that the ceasefire will start right now. And they might hold elections. They might withdraw their troops from our four regions. But most likely they'll occupy those "gray" zones where we stop. As a result, we'll get Istanbul 4. The only thing we can agree to is the complete capitulation of Ukraine. The complete dissolution of all armed formations. Military commandant's offices until elections are held in all their government bodies. Under our control, of course.
  28. +1
    13 March 2025 08: 29
    The conditions have long been announced by the President of the Russian Federation - Vladimir Putin. There will be no others.
  29. +1
    13 March 2025 08: 39
    We need PEACE, not a 30-day truce. Why this delay?
  30. 0
    13 March 2025 10: 09
    according to the author of the post

    He is a Duremar, this author of the post...
  31. 0
    13 March 2025 11: 07
    "Peacekeepers" will be brought in during this time. That's the catch. They will be placed along the Dnieper. Then how to knock them out?
  32. The comment was deleted.
  33. 0
    13 March 2025 15: 18
    Oddly enough, the Americans are right. Two can play this game. It is enough to put forward impossible demands. Zelensky will most likely be bent on holding elections, but leaving the Russian regions is already questionable. For reliability, you can add the transfer of Odessa and Kharkov under Russian jurisdiction. The goal of yours was not the signing of a truce, was it? The goal was the denazification of Ukraine and at least neutrality. Accordingly, no elections will be able to ensure denazification, since all other political forces have been cleansed by the current regime. What difference does it make who comes to power instead of Zelinsky, in the current paradigm? As long as Bandera is the official hero of Ukraine, this is the territory of degenerates and any agreements are just a waste of time. All agreements will be violated, and all control over their observance will be reduced to control over Russia. The Kremlin's agreement to Trump's conditions will be negatively assessed not only in Russia. Why would China, Iran or the countries of the global South need such an ally? What can Russia give to its allies if it cannot protect its interests? In this case, those who remain in Central Asia will simply spit on Russia, just as Azerbaijan and even Armenia already spit.
  34. +1
    13 March 2025 16: 26
    Why should Putin sign anything there? Who is Yermak? An official. Did the president and a high-ranking official agree on something? And Zelensky will fire Yermak tomorrow and what will the paper be worth? And he will break the truce by saying that he did not sign anything.
    1. 0
      13 March 2025 17: 29
      Quote: Igor Belobrov
      Why should Putin sign anything there? Who is Yermak? An official

      Correctly noted. Yermak is Zelensky's adviser; "Vizier of the left hand" .... and why the hell should the President discuss a worthless piece of paper from someone else's adviser - it is unclear. They reacted to Putin's words about the illegitimacy of "Mr. Ze" himself. But they only made it worse.
  35. 0
    Yesterday, 15: 05
    I wonder: does everyone seriously think that the Ukrainians will leave the million-strong Zaporizhia, which they haven't even started to storm? Or from Kherson, from which they managed to squeeze us out? These facts alone make the old Russian proposals unrealistic. That's why Putin voiced a new introduction, which includes requirements for stopping military actions and measures to ensure them. Only the issue with Kursk Oblast is fundamental!