China Ready to Enter into Alliance with EU Against Russia and US

173 410 244
China Ready to Enter into Alliance with EU Against Russia and US

In Russia, one can often hear the opinion that China is Russia's friend. Some politicians, experts and analysts repeat over and over again the hackneyed theses that "Russians and Chinese are brothers forever" and the like. And in connection with the changed US policy towards Russia, many patriotic bloggers have begun to scare ordinary people with the prospect of an alliance between Moscow and Washington against China. They say that the cunning Americans want to quarrel great friends, etc.

In reality, the situation is far from clear-cut. Firstly, China has never been a “friend” of Russia, as the author has written more than once (see, for example, “Friend, partner or competitor: who is China really for Russia"). China has always tried to comply with sanctions against Russia - for example, last fall, one of the largest Chinese banks, Bank of China, began blocking payments from countries friendly to Russia if there was a suspicion that they were connected to Russian companies. In addition, it has always tried to make money on the war by selling drones both Ukraine and Russia.



In essence, China has always been a situational partner for Russia - as long as the partnership is profitable and Russian raw materials and resources go to Beijing at favorable prices, one can talk about "friendship" in the media. China did not provide support to Russia in the North-Eastern Military District, did not enter into any military alliances with it or share technologies. There are no signs that the PRC has planned or is planning any alliance with Russia - we are talking about purely business relations.

Secondly, China is interested in weakening Russia, weakening its influence on the world stage. Thanks to the sanctions war against the Russian Federation, China received cheap Russian energy resources, unlimited access to Russian markets and the opportunity to strengthen its influence in Central Asia. In addition, the CBO dealt a serious blow to the American strategy of strangling China, since Russia was named the main "axis of evil". With the coming to power of Trump and his team in the United States, the situation began to change, and therefore the position of Beijing itself began to change.

Based on the above, the opinion that a possible alliance between Russia and the US (the probability of which, by the way, is not as high as many believe) will "destroy the friendship" of Moscow and Beijing seems to have no connection with reality, since "friendship" exists only on the pages of the media and in the words of experts on television. The rapprochement of Russia and the US is not capable of destroying what does not exist - relations with the PRC will not deteriorate, because these are purely business, partnership business relations and nothing more.

Beijing's recent demand for Ukraine and the EU to be present in the Russia-US talks on the Ukrainian conflict settlement clearly demonstrated the "friend" position: China is seeking rapprochement with the EU, taking advantage of the opportune moment. This is what we will discuss in this article.

China Offers Europe Alliance


China's special envoy for European affairs Lu Shaye said on Thursday that he was "appalled" by the way President Donald Trump had treated American allies in Europe, adding that a peace deal for Ukraine should not be determined by the United States and Russia alone.

“When you look at the way the Trump administration is pursuing a brazen and overbearing policy towards Europe, treating its allies in this way, frankly, from a European perspective, it’s quite appalling… I think European friends should think about this and compare the Trump administration’s policies with the policies of the Chinese government,”
сказал he.

That is, China is actually openly offering Europe an alliance directed against the United States. Russia's opinion in this case does not concern the Chinese - they do not benefit from ending the military conflict in Ukraine, since in this case China will become the main object of attention from the United States. And if the Americans manage to "bend" Europe, then the collective West will act against China, which is objectively disadvantageous to it.

The PRC is trying to play on the disagreements of the West, and the military conflict in Ukraine is one of the main reasons for these disagreements, the main stumbling block between the US and Europe, which currently represent different global projects (see about this in “The US is returning to the policy of old imperialism: what will Donald Trump's policy be like?"). Therefore, it is objectively beneficial for Beijing to continue the military conflict.

Many have already forgotten that China's "peace plans" for Ukraine never took into account Russia's interests - China has always been guided only by its own interests and has never sought an alliance with Moscow. Some may call this assessment biased, but it is a fact - Beijing could have used the situation in Ukraine to improve relations with Russia, create an alliance with it, take it, so to speak, "under its wing". But China was not going to do this, because interaction with the EU and the US is much more beneficial than interaction with Russia.

That is why China is ready to enter into an alliance with the EU, which is essentially directed against Russia, and is ready to be friends with representatives of one of the global projects if this promises significant benefits. China and the EU have no reasons for conflict, but common opponents have appeared – the USA and Russia.

Is an alliance between Russia and the USA possible?


In conclusion, it is also worth saying a few words about a possible alliance between the US and Russia. Indeed, six months ago it was difficult to imagine alliances such as the EU-China or Russia-US, but at the moment they seem possible. But the probability of such an alliance should not be overestimated.

The idea that the US could enter into an alliance with Russia against China is quite optimistic – despite the fact that Trump has a fairly good attitude towards Russia, one should not forget that the attitude towards Moscow in America is far from unambiguous and the creation of such an alliance could seriously damage the positions of the American president and the new administration.

Therefore, improving relations with the Russian Federation, the return of American companies and the partial lifting of sanctions is a very real scenario, and improving relations with Washington will not harm relations with China in any way, since, as has already been said, China and the Russian Federation are not allies and never have been. If it is in Russia's interests to improve relations with the United States, then why can't this be done?

But the likelihood of any alliance between Russia and the US directed against China is much lower, because, as has already been said, America itself has a very ambiguous attitude towards it, and Trump’s desire alone (even if it exists) may not be enough.

However, let us finally ask ourselves one more question: if China is seeking rapprochement and an alliance with the EU, which is hostile to Russia, then why should Russia refuse lucrative offers from the US, if such suddenly come?
244 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +38
    12 March 2025 04: 19
    if such suddenly arrive?
    Nothing will come to us! And no one will help us. Russia is left alone, surrounded by enemies.
    1. +41
      12 March 2025 04: 48
      More precisely, it was our geo-wise geo-grandmasters of the geostrategic level who brought her there. hi
      1. +4
        12 March 2025 04: 51
        Quote: Kolobochek
        Geo-Grandmasters of the Geo-Strategic Level

        Cooler: Supergalactic level! Or rather - local... negative
        1. -10
          12 March 2025 17: 43
          It is necessary to offer China one of the key positions in the settlement of the conflict in Ukraine to stop the SVO. Involve a representative of China in negotiations and ask China to send peacekeepers with a UN mandate to the disputed areas to control the withdrawal of the Ukrainian Armed Forces from 4 regions within the administrative boundaries:
          - Donetsk;
          - Lugansk;
          - Kherson;
          - Zaporozhye.
          And what can we offer in response? Specifically and clearly. Just one assumption, which is not voiced - we will destroy the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Kursk region before the beginning of the ceasefire.
          Ukraine withdraws the Ukrainian Armed Forces from 4 regions completely. The withdrawal is carried out immediately after the ceasefire under the control of representatives of the PLA army with a UN mandate, who are immediately deployed in the liberated territories and control the rapid withdrawal schedule. We sharply increase the role of China and give a constructive rapid response.
          I really don't like this plan and it's not a fact that the US will accept it. The complete liberation of 4 regions within the administrative borders was voiced by Belousov, or these words are attributed to him.

          https://yandex.ru/video/preview/8667170383889110934

          The surrounded troops, if they leave without weapons under the control of UN observers. A quick positive response and the ball goes to the US side!!!

          My comment on another analysis.
          1. +2
            13 March 2025 10: 23
            Why are the Chinese on our territory? And as a force they are an absolute dud. What can they do to pacify things there, the eternal whipping boys?
      2. +18
        12 March 2025 07: 25
        Russia is always alone, it's just that now this has finally begun to reach the country's leaders
        1. AAK
          +13
          12 March 2025 10: 46
          Colleague, you are talking about some kind of paradox: something like “it has finally begun to dawn on the country’s leaders that Russia is alone”, after about 25 years of diligently pushing it into this very position...
          1. -2
            12 March 2025 13: 33
            Quote: AAK
            after 25 years of pushing her hard into this very position...

            And how did they push her there?
        2. 0
          12 March 2025 12: 05
          Why? They always said that there are friends - the Army and the Navy. There are also ill-wishers like you.
          1. +6
            12 March 2025 13: 18
            It's not funny. Russia really has strong contradictions with China. Especially at the base - in China society is building communism and developing socialism with Chinese characteristics, our society has rolled back to feudal capitalism. The results are quite visible.
            1. -4
              12 March 2025 13: 21
              Give less importance to all sorts of "isms". The essence of society is something else and deeper.
            2. +4
              12 March 2025 13: 30
              WHAT COMMUNISM? Everything in China has long since switched to commodity-money relations. They are further from Communism now than the USSR was in 1985.
              1. +7
                12 March 2025 14: 46
                Quote: PROXOR
                Everything in China has long since switched to commodity-money relations.

                There is no national or class multiplication table. Why don't our newly-minted bourgeois develop the country like that? In China, corrupt officials are shot, and someone like Chubais would be hanged, not sent abroad with state secrets and loot. Whatever it is, the Communist Party rules there, and its effectiveness is as good as that of United Russia.
                1. 0
                  12 March 2025 21: 35
                  Quote: Per se.
                  rules there communist lol lol the consignment,
                  and it includes 88 dollar billionaires, delegates to the CPC Congress...
                  And so 2 place in the world by number of billionaires.....
                  And the Marxist-Leninists convinced everyone that ownership of the means of production and the exploitation of man by man is ugh, crap...
                  Somebody brechet like a grey gelding - either Marxist Leninists or Chinese so-called "communists"

                  Quote: Per se.
                  which is as effective as the United Russia party, like going barefoot to Beijing.
                  Of course, for us with our 125 billionaires, the Chinese communist 1080 billionaires are - as you rightly noted - as far as Beijing...
                  1. +7
                    13 March 2025 09: 52
                    Quote: your1970
                    It includes 88 dollar billionaires, delegates to the CPC Congress...
                    And so 2nd place in the world in the number of billionaires.....

                    So what? With Chinese billionaires, China is confidently becoming an increasingly powerful country, and with our toasts, the remnants of Soviet greatness are being eaten away. They don't have a problem like "import substitution", and we don't know how we'll survive without products from China. In addition, communism is not a dogma, and progress is not a monopoly of capitalism.
                    You are still trying to justify the existing and question the Soviet. So, "damned communists", under them there were no smartphones and social networks, abundance of used foreign cars and watered-down beer. Actually, 34 years have passed, where would the Soviet Union be if there was real perestroika, glasnost and acceleration.
                    1. -2
                      13 March 2025 10: 21
                      You are mixing everything into one bowl. We were discussing the issue of communism in China, and for some reason you mixed our ghoul oligarchs into it.
                      Alas, it will take time for the generations of ghouls from the former USSR and their children to start leaving power. They can do nothing but steal. They have already stolen enough for 100 generations to come, but they still haven't had enough.
                      1. +5
                        13 March 2025 11: 55
                        Quote: PROXOR
                        You are mixing everything into one bowl.

                        Let's be clear, communism does not appear immediately with the appearance of communists, it is a long process of construction. Also, communism will not come if everyone is accepted into the communist party, it is also a process in the evolution of society and the economy. There is a saying that theory without practice is dead, and practice without theory is blind.
                        Capitalism did not develop suddenly, and not without the natural selection of the strong and the weak, it is more experienced and older. Nevertheless, it has had its day. Why, firstly, its main positive - competition, has actually turned into a fiction, with the emergence of transnational monopolies and the established world leader and master of this already planetary system. Secondly, its essence is an economic pyramid, where without expanding the base, new colonies, a crisis begins, a great depression, and for a reboot, as well as for the general parasitism of the top of the pyramid, wars are needed. What you recalled and quoted the definitions of communism is, first of all, a theory, there is no need to make a dogma out of it, especially liken it to religion. Communism will not suddenly fall out of space, it will appear on the basis of what society has achieved, this also applies to such a phenomenon as billionaires. The question is, when will capitalism die on its own, or is a world revolution needed? He himself will definitely not die, but in my opinion, it is better to have outright billionaires than opportunists-turncoats, renegades who betrayed the Communist Party. Having betrayed once, they will betray again, only no one will believe them anymore.
                        Maybe, in order to collapse world capitalism, Russia had to be introduced into it, so that everyone would see both their traitors and the true wolfish face of the "democracy" that bought us. Of course, this is only my personal opinion.
                    2. 0
                      13 March 2025 10: 45
                      At whose expense and on whose back is it being built? There are dozens of such powerful ones in history, with the most brutal exploitation. We have gone the other way, there is a pipe, it is for all occasions. And we do not touch the elokhtorat, let it parasitize.
                    3. 0
                      13 March 2025 14: 57
                      Quote: Per se.
                      Besides, communism is not a dogma.

                      If you are sure about its positions - it follows from it that in the USSR there were idiots at the top - who did not understand that communism is not a dogma, and that for the development of the country private ownership of the means of production and 1080 billionaires are needed.
                      And from this it follows that Marxism-Leninism does not exist in principle - as a doctrine based on the impossibility of private ownership of the means of production.
                      You are welcome selection - either the teachings of Marx-Engels-Lenin are lies, or China has state capitalism.

                      In my opinion, if 75% of the country's industry, 80% of the banking sector belongs to private individuals, among whom are 1080 dollar billionaires, then the name "Communist" is simply a trade brand of China, nothing more...
                      1. +2
                        14 March 2025 10: 13
                        Quote: your1970
                        In my opinion, if 75% of the country's industry, 80% of the banking sector belongs to private individuals, among whom are 1080 dollar billionaires, then the name "Communist" is simply a trade brand of China, nothing more...

                        The whole question is who and how controls these "private individuals", to whose mill the water flows. In our country, even the Central Bank of the Russian Federation kept the squandered 300 billion in other people's banks, instead of investing in its economy, its industry, essentially financing someone else's uncle abroad. There is nothing to say about all sorts of Abramovichs and Potanins, where their money is and where assets are taken out of Russia. So think about it. As for the "isms", no one will say yet what even socialism, much less communism, can be. Humanity has not yet tested this evolution of society, despite the fact that capitalism here is being a jerk and shitting as much as it can. But if we do not get rid of capitalism with its crazy "rulers of the world", nothing good will come of this for humanity, "digital slavery" and "zombieland", from Hollywood horror stories may well become a near reality.
                      2. -1
                        14 March 2025 12: 14
                        Quote: Per se.
                        Humanity has not yet tested this evolution of society

                        Quote: Per se.
                        If we don't get rid of capitalism and its crazy "rulers of the world", nothing good will come of it to humanity it doesn't shine,

                        That is, you are proposing to move from studied capitalism - which shows good results - the same China or Denmark - you are proposing to move to the untested evolution of society?
                        Considering that there is not even a scientific basis?
                        You are kind, however...
                        You are forgetting a smaaaall nuance - this is then it was possible to promise that "Our grandchildren will live happily!!", and the current consumer society will say in six months - a year maximum "And where? Where is our happiness? Why should we stand in line for milk? We impaled Chubais, but where is the joy from this??!! Why do we need the joy of our grandchildren - if we don't plan to have children??!"©
                        And socialism will end before it is born...

                        And yes, all socialist revolutions of the 20th century either resulted in loss in war, or occupation by a foreign army, or total poverty, or a combination.
                      3. +2
                        14 March 2025 14: 43
                        Quote: your1970
                        And yes, all socialist revolutions of the 20th century either resulted in loss in war, or occupation by a foreign army, or total poverty, or a combination.

                        Sergey, you are distorting things. Let's agree that neither my nor your opinion will change anything, it will be what "the doctor ordered". Time will put everything in its place.
                      4. -1
                        14 March 2025 15: 16
                        Quote: Per se.
                        Quote: your1970
                        And yes, all socialist revolutions of the 20th century either resulted in loss in war, or occupation by a foreign army, or total poverty, or a combination.

                        Sergey, you are distorting things. Let's agree that neither my nor your opinion will change anything, it will be what "the doctor ordered". Time will put everything in its place.

                        At least one revolution without these 3 points - so that it happens on its own.
                        Cuba is alone without military consequences, but
                        There was such poverty in Cuba that a prostitute for the night cost a dollar - if she came with breakfast belay
                        All others - as described above.
                        If you can give an example of the opposite, we'll discuss it, but I'm sure that these 3 positions were involved.
                    4. 0
                      13 March 2025 23: 47
                      A very healthy and practical view of the diversity of currents in communism. It is also worth considering the completely different mentality of communes as clans, which is very important in China.
                      1. +1
                        15 March 2025 10: 48
                        And what is healthy here? Whose mill are billionaires pouring into? Their own, of course, the mill of exploitation and infringement of the rights of the proletariat. Whenever speaking about China as a country with communist ideology, they start comparing it with the USSR, which lost its socialist achievements. Well, neither there nor here today have them. We can put an equal sign.
                  2. +1
                    13 March 2025 10: 18
                    Communism (from the Latin communis - "common, universal") is a political, philosophical and economic ideology that defines the goal of human development as the establishment of a social order based on social equality and common ownership of the means of production. 1

                    Communist society presupposes the abolition of private property, any social classes, money and, in its final stage, the institution of the state. 1


                    I'll give you my 5 cents. If you take those dollar billionaires, they started their path by slave exploitation of their own Chinese people. These are the kind of Communist billionaires)))
                    1. +1
                      15 March 2025 10: 50
                      And they continue to exploit it today, under the control of the supervisor "K" PC.
                2. 0
                  13 March 2025 10: 16
                  And what does all of the above have to do with Communism?
                  Communism (from the Latin communis - "common, universal") is a political, philosophical and economic ideology that defines the goal of human development as the establishment of a social order based on social equality and common ownership of the means of production.

                  Communist society presupposes the abolition of private property, any social classes, money and, in its final stage, the institution of the state.

                  Well?
                3. 0
                  13 March 2025 10: 40
                  Two of a kind. And the Chinese efficiency lies in a completely different plane. Although, as an ant-watchman, the "K" PC really succeeds.
                4. +2
                  13 March 2025 12: 45
                  In China, corrupt officials are shot, but someone like Chubais would have been hanged instead of sent abroad with state secrets and stolen goods.
                  This is not a sign of communism at all, it is simply adequacy. This is how they did it in antiquity, and under the tsarist regime Chubais would have been impaled. There is no communism in China, but there are hundreds of billionaires
              2. +4
                13 March 2025 08: 08
                Quote: PROXOR
                WHAT COMMUNISM? Everything in China has long since switched to commodity-money relations. They are further from Communism now than the USSR was in 1985.

                Oh, come on. It doesn't matter what they call themselves. The main thing is that they all work for China, and not to steal a piece and run away abroad.
                1. +2
                  13 March 2025 10: 23
                  So what? In the US, everyone works for the states, and in Scandinavia, everyone works for their countries. There is no Chinese communist miracle here. It's just wildness for us.
                  And for us it is wildness, because we have forgotten how to live and work for our country. We are surviving.
                  1. -1
                    14 March 2025 14: 15
                    Quote: PROXOR
                    So what? In the US, everyone works for the states, and in Scandinavia, everyone works for their own countries.

                    You answer to yourself.
                    Quote: PROXOR
                    And for us this is wildness, because we have forgotten how to live and work for our country.

                    Not only ALL OF US.
                    The SVO proves that not everyone is ready to put their pockets above the Motherland.
                    And the rest, I agree.
                  2. +1
                    14 March 2025 14: 19
                    Quote: PROXOR
                    We have forgotten how to live and work for our country.

                    It's just that some people don't consider the country theirs.
                2. +1
                  13 March 2025 15: 43
                  Quote: skeptic
                  The main thing is that they all work for China, and not to steal a piece and run away abroad.

                  Therefore, in China it was necessary to create a special service, the "Heavenly Network", to return those who had fled. lol lol abroad corrupt officials.....
                  1. 0
                    13 March 2025 23: 50
                    The human factor. However, the approach to solving this issue is also practical.
                  2. +1
                    14 March 2025 14: 19
                    Quote: your1970
                    Quote: skeptic
                    The main thing is that they all work for China, and not to steal a piece and run away abroad.

                    Therefore, in China it was necessary to create a special service, the "Heavenly Network", to return those who had fled. lol lol abroad corrupt officials.....

                    There is no dispute - "There is always a black sheep in every family", but we have one problem - CORRUPTION RESERVE.
                    1. 0
                      14 March 2025 14: 27
                      Quote: skeptic
                      Quote: your1970
                      Quote: skeptic
                      The main thing is that they all work for China, and not to steal a piece and run away abroad.

                      Therefore, in China it was necessary to create a special service, the "Heavenly Network", to return those who had fled. lol lol abroad corrupt officials.....

                      There is no dispute - "There is always a black sheep in every family", but we have one problem - CORRUPTION RESERVE.

                      Look at the number of people who fled China.
                      And also the fact that the main buyers of luxury real estate in world capitals, including London, have long been the Chinese from China.
                      We still have a long way to go to catch up with China in terms of corruption belay
                3. +1
                  13 March 2025 23: 05
                  So, apparently, the Chinese have long been the main buyers of real estate in London?
              3. +2
                13 March 2025 09: 01
                In 2021, women began to retire at 50, and men at 55, and a whole bunch of other benefits, including a free annual ticket to one of the tourist countries. They do not have a Pension Fund, but for some reason pensions are increasing, in the event of the death of a pensioner, his contribution is transferred to the heirs. And a wagon and a small cart of all sorts of nice things.
                1. +2
                  13 March 2025 10: 27
                  What new have you written here that was not in the USSR? China has not created anything new here in the social sense.
                  But everything that is happening in our country is a crime committed by everyone. When all these laws were being pushed through, everyone was sitting at home on the couch, drinking beer and arguing with the TV. Even the overfed farmers of Europe pour shit on government agencies when they protest. And here everyone thinks that a good guy should come and restore order in their country. Order in the country begins with its citizens. And even in a country of 140 million, at least half will raise a fuss, the top brass will have to listen.
                  1. 0
                    15 March 2025 05: 59
                    I somehow didn't understand your message through the chaff? Is it bad that China lowered the retirement age and increased their pensions?
                    1. 0
                      Yesterday, 11: 18
                      Where do I write that it is bad? If you have problems with Russian speech, then you should not contact me.
                2. -1
                  13 March 2025 10: 33
                  With a population of one and a half billion, this is the end of the budget. The propaganda of the "K"PK is directed outward. In reality, the workers there are very sour. This only concerns civil servants. A non-state pension, dependent on a parasite capitalist, is something. Nonsense and noodles on the ears.
                  1. 0
                    13 March 2025 12: 31
                    I see the bot is chatting with itself laughing The bot has become smaller now and doesn't know the material at all. An anti-Soviet person is always a Russophobe.
                    1. 0
                      14 March 2025 00: 00
                      Are you talking about me, comrade? laughing Am I anti-Soviet? fool We've arrived. What kind of hardware are we talking about?
                  2. 0
                    15 March 2025 06: 53
                    Even if it only affects government employees, is that bad?
                    1. 0
                      15 March 2025 10: 36
                      Okay. Only if you don't count the fact that China is socialist. About 350 million people there really live from the belly, due to the most brutal exploitation of the working class and peasantry, the rest of the billion people. Socialism and the power of the huckster are incompatible concepts. This is an axiom.
                      1. 0
                        16 March 2025 07: 15
                        I think that China is on the path of socialism! I don’t know about the most brutal exploitation, you repeat the narratives of the West that in China, small children’s hands assemble all the electronics, and therefore they are competitive. Although these are fairy tales! In China, wages have long exceeded 3rd world standards. In many respects, they are world leaders! As they figuratively say, they live in the 22nd century. They have not been world leaders in pollution for a long time. Last year, they produced more green energy (solar, wind and others) than the rest of the world together! So it is no wonder that their well-being and standard of living are growing. The retirement age is decreasing. 55 years in China and 67 in the USA, perhaps this is an indicator?! And what socialism should be like, no one knows, and in the USSR there was the NEP, there is the Scandinavian model, as I understand it, socialism is a humane system with social assistance to the poor, with a state system of medicine and education. I don't think that Marx can be an unshakable standard. There can be mixed systems. The same Western European countries have a system close to socialism in one way or another. I'm not talking about the States, where socialism exists only for big business and corporations, and for the very poor. Although now Trump is trying to eliminate even these small beginnings of social assistance. To create a jungle system or, say, Sparta. Where only the strongest will survive, i.e. the rich.
                      2. 0
                        16 March 2025 10: 46
                        Socialism is the absence of private ownership of the means of production and the bourgeois hanger-on, on the neck of the proletariat. Compliance with the principle of whoever does not work, does not eat, and the trader performs an auxiliary function in society, but is not its foundation. That is, Soviet socialism. There have been no others yet.
                        The NEP was a forced measure and it was quickly rolled back, along with the necks of the NEP-men.
                        I am not voicing any Western narratives. China is very closed to the world and what it broadcasts to the outside world should be divided by two, or even three. A 12-15 hour workday is not very similar to socialism. And the supposedly "high" salary, with a parasite making millions on exploitation and a huge income gap, is also not socialism at all.
                        The difference in the USSR, at all stages, even extremely critical ones, was a maximum of three to four times. Often a worker earned no less than a minister.
                        In China, the worker is under the most severe pressure from both the "communists" and the bourgeois. He is an ant, not a hegemon.
            3. +2
              12 March 2025 21: 26
              Quote: Civil
              in China society builds communism and develops socialism with Chinese characteristics
              1080 billionaires and 2nd place in the world by the number of billionaires
              Quote: Civil
              our society has rolled back feudal capitalism.
              125 billionaires.
              The classics of Marxism would say that where there are billionaires more - there is capitalism there, because they own the means of production
              So either you are wrong or the classics of Marxism-Leninism...
            4. 0
              13 March 2025 10: 28
              Communism with the dominance of traders and private property? This is something new. Really specific.
            5. 0
              13 March 2025 14: 45
              Building communism and socialism? You should stop using.
        3. 0
          13 March 2025 00: 06
          So you say "Russia is always one, it's just that now it's finally starting to reach the country's leaders", but don't you think that with oligarchic Russia, with the Russian elite, who practically betrayed the country, eager to go to their yachts and dachas in the West, where the children and families of the PRC are, and other countries like India really want to do business? Nothing good can be expected from the corrupt comprodor leadership, they want to trade resources and us here and now. So don't be surprised that in 3 years the SVO has not really started...
      3. kvv
        -4
        12 March 2025 11: 24
        Or, more precisely, one geo-wise geo-grandmaster and hockey player
      4. +7
        12 March 2025 12: 03
        Should we have gone the other way? Calmly watch as children are killed in Donbass?
        1. 0
          13 March 2025 10: 37
          We watched it for eight years and nothing happened.
      5. +4
        12 March 2025 12: 52
        Quote: Kolobochek
        More precisely, it was our geo-wise geo-grandmasters of the geostrategic level who brought her there. hi

        What other alliance with the USA?
        What alliance with China?
        Trump started trade wars. That's where all this dancing comes from.
        China will not be friends with the European Union against us. No.
        We need to conduct our policies in the context of a multipolar world.
        The work of our highly successful Foreign Ministry does not even deserve any criticism. It seems that the Foreign Ministry does not work at all. Russia is again in complete political isolation. The DPRK and Belarus can be called Russia's allies, but only with reservations.
      6. 0
        13 March 2025 10: 18
        Did I understand correctly that we had to support the Maidan, and from the windows of million-dollar Tiguanas and Camrys, chewing Parmesan, watch as NATO was settling in Crimea and Donbass, while simultaneously destroying local dissidents with impunity?
        1. +1
          14 March 2025 18: 45
          There is no need to protect their "majesties". The SVO itself is essentially a consequence of previous strategic miscalculations and mistakes of the Russian leadership. Over 20 years of rule, it would have been possible to at least create pro-Russian forces in Ukraine from a quarter of its population consisting of ethnic Russians, offering them Russian citizenship back in 2004. But no, they turned out to be unworthy, and the migrants from Central Asia are a different matter.
      7. 0
        14 March 2025 18: 40
        Alas, this process continues to this day. And it is unlikely to stop as long as the dumb biomass continues to shout its "hurray" at them.
    2. +2
      12 March 2025 10: 23
      I strongly recommend reading the original documents. There is a speech by Wang Yi translated into English by the Chinese themselves, not by Reuters or Bloomberg. When you read it, it immediately becomes clear that either they translated it incorrectly, or they don't know Chinese at all.
      1. 0
        13 March 2025 07: 06
        They've had enough of this blkmbkrg. Our media advertise it. You turn on some notorious RBK and they keep droning on about the same thing. You're a channel yourself and you're promoting God knows who. One Bloomberg said, as Martsinkevich once said about the pearls of this information bureau
    3. -1
      13 March 2025 07: 04
      Don't flatter yourself and us. Russia alone won't cope or it will take too long, because production is destroyed. Therefore, we are doomed to a partnership with China. What else can we do? Thanks to all this school of ours. But they all live in Russia, for the most part. They themselves broke and robbed, and now you see they have nowhere to go and no one to turn to.
      1. 0
        13 March 2025 09: 10
        Have you read what we are talking about? Who was talking about breaking mutually beneficial ties with China?
        1. 0
          13 March 2025 09: 16
          Nobody said. Don't get into trouble. My comment is not about that at all.
    4. 0
      13 March 2025 08: 00
      Quote from Uncle Lee
      What if such things suddenly come in? We won't get anything!

      They will, they will. Now Ukraine is against Russia, and then Russia is against China. This is the whole vision of the Naglosaks, the need for "new Indians", Slavs.
      For this, the thieving bourgeoisie of Russia will be given an indulgence to use the stolen goods abroad.
  2. +17
    12 March 2025 04: 53
    and who said that China and Russia are allies? These are strategic partners who have been cooperating for over 30 years at the diplomatic, anti-terrorist, and economic levels. Now it has come to the de-dollarization of trade, to large energy projects, to the Arctic, nuclear power plants, and so on. An alliance is not needed. And more than 30 years of partnership is already a standard, and there will be more. And the banks of China that are sitting on the dollar and the US - this is not the whole story. Many are working with the Russian Federation - trade records were broken in 2022, 2023, 2024. All this without banks? Joker! Both powers want a quiet rear and a neighbor who will help as much as he can. This has been going on for over 30 years already. And the various jerks of Trump and the EU are all a temporary mess
    1. +9
      12 March 2025 06: 30
      Quote: El Roz
      And the various jerks of Trump and the EU are all temporary.

      So these are jerks for us. And if the Kremlin did not react to these jerks in any way, but continued to bend its line, then everything would be fine. But now everyone has seen what happens when the US starts to beckon with its finger.


      Quote: El Roz
      Now it has come to de-dollarization

      Well, finally. How soon will the dollar collapse now?

      Quote: El Roz
      with RF - trade broke records in 2022, 2023, 2024.

      And did it beat Chinese-American trade?
      1. +5
        12 March 2025 09: 54
        Quote: Stas157
        So these are leaps and bounds for us.

        Oh, come on, look at Europe and the US, how they are torn apart by such jerks, that's where the templates are broken. And Russia's position in these conditions (I hope you see this too) is very reserved, cautious (in terms of trust in American initiatives) and unyielding in terms of fulfilling the tasks set by the SVO.
        Or have you noticed the suspension of our offensive actions despite the weather? Or is someone in power ready to agree to a "truce" along the demarcation line? And even more so to some kind of "ceasefire"? Do you see this?
        I don't see it. But I see the intensification and massiveness of the attacks, a decisive offensive in the Kursk region, I constantly hear how the Ukrainian Armed Forces are being destroyed by heavy FABs. I hear it from Donetsk.
        Quote: Stas157
        If the Kremlin had not reacted to these jerks in any way, but had continued to stick to its line, then everything would have been fine.

        So he bends. All the jumps and antics are now being performed by Kyiv clowns and European quad bikers. That's who's on fire now.
        Quote: Stas157
        what happens when the US starts to beckon with its finger.

        What happens? Or what happened?
        Trump wants to stop the war, it interferes with his plans and does not correspond to the interests of his country. He takes some action.
        And what is the Kremlin's reaction?
        We are ready for peace talks on our terms. The terms have been announced before and they are NOT changing YET.
        What are the conditions?
        Withdrawal of the Ukrainian Armed Forces from the territories of Russian regions - DPR, LPR, Zaporizhzhya and Kherson regions. Do it - LET'S START NEGOTIATIONS. Because THESE are the conditions for START negotiations.
        Will the Kyiv Clown agree to these conditions?
        Definitely NO.
        So WHAT does that mean? That's right - we continue to LIBERATE our Earth.
        And if he suddenly does, then WHAT?
        Well then NEGOTIATIONS WILL BEGIN. About fulfilling Russia's conditions:
        - Demilitarization - COMPLETE disarmament of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and issuance of all heavy weapons, abolition of the B/U Army, only police with LIGHT small arms.
        - Denazification - prohibition of all nationalist and pro-fascist parties, movements, organizations, inclusion of a ban on propaganda of Nazism/nationalism in the Constitution, arrest and extradition to the Military Tribunal of all military and political criminals guilty of terrorism and genocide of the Russian/Russian-speaking population of the former/Ukrainian and occupied territories of Russia, and other war crimes.
        - Neutral Status, prohibiting any unions and alliances, especially military ones, a ban on the presence of any foreign troops on the territory of the former USSR except for the RF Armed Forces and the Russian National Guard.
        - Payment of reparations for the damage caused to Russia, including damage caused to five new regions of Russia. In multiple amounts, of course.
        - The results of the elections and all appointments on the balances of the former must be approved by the Special Department of the Government of the Russian Federation. In order to exclude the slightest attempts at revenge.
        That's about it.
        Do you think the Kyiv fascists will agree to such conditions? Very soft and lenient, by the way. Will they agree?
        Or not ?
        And if NO, the SVO continues until the set tasks are fully resolved.
        This is where it's all heading. And the most interesting thing is that Trump agrees with this. Remember: "Ukraine will become Russia again"? Or when he said to Zelensky: "You'll jump so much that Ukraine will no longer exist"? Or "If Ukraine doesn't show the will for peace, we will simply LEAVE"?
        So for now everything is going well.
        Quote: Stas157
        How soon will the dollar collapse now?

        Why do you need this? It's one thing if the Bretton Woods System collapses, and quite another if the national currency of the United States collapses. Trump wants to return the dollar's status as the national currency of the United States and control over the Federal Reserve System (a cartel of private banks, the greater half of which are European \\ see the history of the creation of the Federal Reserve System). It's time for us to return our own financial sovereignty, so that some "Central Bank of the Russian Federation" does not dare to commit arbitrariness with the discount rate and somersaults with the ruble exchange rate.
        Quote: Stas157
        And did it beat Chinese-American trade?

        Let's first compare ourselves with the US economy, and then measure the volumes of mutual trade.

        But as for the topic of the article, China, with such statements and actions, is pushing Russia towards rapprochement with the United States. And these are not only security issues, but also commercial interests. Is Trump's cabinet preparing to lift sanctions? And how can this harm us? We will again drive our fuel oil to the United States (they have it at the price of heavy oil), some equipment, other goods. But even this is not the most interesting thing. The fact is that the lifting of US sanctions against us automatically lifts trade sanctions against Japan and South Korea. Oops. wink But this is even more interesting for us than trading with China, because we will be able to get all the industrial equipment for our enterprises, for our Industrialization 2.0 THERE. The quality is higher there, the range is wider, and there are no geopolitical ambitions - only trade. So don't worry if suddenly China turns out to be "neither a friend nor an enemy, but just" ... or simply an enemy, an ally of our enemy ... We will have a place to get industrial equipment and a place to sell our gas and oil. But in that case, China's geostrategic position will become completely HORRIBLE. Does it need it? Isn't it better to continue to maintain neutrality? Friendly neutrality. Because we are not going to be friends against China. Against Europe and England - YES. And with China - neutrality, good-neighborly partnership and mutually beneficial trade relations. But if China goes over to the side of our Ancient Enemy... it will choose its own destiny.
        Therefore, a choice must be made - the right one.
        According to the principle: "Do not look for friends far away, and enemies close by."
        In this situation, China should stand aside, maybe they’ll invite us as a third party when we resolve our own issues.
        1. -6
          12 March 2025 10: 01
          Amendment:
          Quote: bayard
          We'll send our fuel oil to the US again (they have it at the price of heavy oil), they have some equipment, other goods

          ...we will start purchasing.
        2. +5
          12 March 2025 10: 08
          Quote: bayard
          Withdrawal of the Ukrainian Armed Forces from the territories of Russian regions - DPR, LPR, Zaporizhzhya and Kherson regions. Do it - LET'S START NEGOTIATIONS.

          If only your words would reach God's ears. If only Odessa were liberated. That would be a real holiday! But I am tormented by vague doubts. I am afraid I will not get to that point. And the most unpleasant thing is that there are grounds for such fears.
          1. +3
            12 March 2025 10: 37
            Everyone is worried now, but you are still watching the events, and not just the words of politicians. "The language is given to a politician in order to hide his thoughts and plans as best as possible." But in practice, our fighters have already occupied all the islands of the Dnieper delta and are making forays/searches to the Right Bank - in several places at once, probing the defense to capture bridgeheads. This is already from the statements of the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine from that direction. They are afraid that the RF Armed Forces will not rest on Kherson, but will immediately go to Nikolaev. We'll live and see.
            In the meantime, the Americans are unwinding the Sumerians, for whom the main thing is that Zelensky signs debt obligations to the USA. And no matter what they promise them now, these are just words for one thing - a signature under the Bill.
          2. +5
            12 March 2025 10: 39
            And besides Odessa, our truly Russian lands, the Kharkov and Dnepropetrovsk regions, are we going to leave them to the Bandera Nazis? This is not right and we cannot allow this.
            1. 0
              12 March 2025 19: 18
              Quote: sgrabik
              And besides Odessa, our truly Russian lands, the Kharkov and Dnepropetrovsk regions, are we going to leave them to the Bandera Nazis? This is not right and we cannot allow this.

              If we recall the answer of VVP to the journalist's question after the DPR (and LPR) were accepted into the Russian Federation, about "within what borders?", then everything sounded very clearly there - within the borders according to the Constitution of the DPR. And the DPR, having declared itself the successor of the Donetsk-Krivoy Rog Republic, has borders that include the Donetsk, Dnepropetrovsk and Zaporizhzhya regions. It was in this composition that Lenin included ours (the Donetsk-Krivoy Rog Republic) into the Ukrainian SSR. So now, according to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, Russia is obliged to liberate not only the DPR and the Zaporizhzhya region, but also the Dnepropetrovsk region - as an integral part of the DPR, which has almost 3 years now been part of the Russian Federation.
              Odessa and Nikolaev regions were generally part of the RSFSR. The Ukrainian SSR represented only a few regions around Kyiv at the time of joining the Union State. Everything else it received as part of the USSR from Russia. And Putin periodically reminds us of this.
              But for now, Donetsk region is not liberated either. The SVO continues.
        3. -2
          12 March 2025 18: 00
          Quote: bayard
          It is one thing if the Bretton Woods System collapses, and quite another if the US national currency collapses.

          The Bretton Woods system collapsed after the dollar was no longer backed by gold, and it's a shame not to know that...
          Formally, the Jamaican system is now in effect:
          https://topwar.ru/97758-bretton-vudskaya-sistema-ili-kak-ssha-zahvatyvali-mirovoe-gospodstvo.html
          1. -1
            12 March 2025 19: 08
            Quote: yuriy55
            Formally, the Jamaican system is now in effect:

            Then they simply cancelled the backing of the dollar with gold and introduced “backing with oil”, having agreed with the Gulf monarchs that they would only sell in dollars.
            And the system itself not only did not collapse, but after the murder of the USSR, the dissolution of the Socialist Bloc and the CMEA (where international settlements were conducted in transferable rubles) it expanded the geography of its dominance to the entire Planet. So the dollar (for now, for sure) is still the main currency of international trade and money circulation. But it is already seriously shaky. It's just that today the share of the US economy (with all futures, derivatives and markups) is no more than 15% of the world GDP, and at the time of the establishment of the Bretton Woods System, the US share was 52%.
            The USSR's share of world GDP at the end of the 80s was 25% (the US's was approximately 32%).
            Rather, the world is expecting a division into several currency zones, in which the currency of the leader of the macro-region will be used. The BRICS currency did not take off, because India is against it.
    2. +10
      12 March 2025 07: 16
      ... Beijing's recent demand for Ukraine and the EU to be present in the Russia-US negotiations on the Ukrainian conflict settlement clearly demonstrated the position of the "friend"...


      This demand from the PRC reveals a serious problem for Russia: who can the Russian Federation trust to play a peacekeeping role in Ukraine after the conclusion of a “peace treaty?”

      It turned out - no one. Russia found itself alone, surrounded by unfriendly countries.
      Russian elites must accept this reality.
      Only the Army and Navy are reliable allies of Russia, and the Army and Navy = the RUSSIAN PEOPLE.
      Will our Russian government be able to understand this?

      Until 1991, the USSR Armed Forces acted as the guarantor of peace (PEACEKEEPING TROOPS) on the territory of Europe.

      ... Northern Group of Forces (SGV) - on the territory of the Polish People's Republic from 1945 to 1991;
      Central Group of Forces (CGF) - on the territory of Austria, Hungary and Czechoslovakia - from 1945 to 1955, and in Czechoslovakia - from 1968 to 1991;
      Group of Soviet Forces in Germany (GSOVG, then GSVG) - on the territory of the German Democratic Republic from 1945 to 1994;
      Southern Group of Forces (SGF) - on the territory of Bulgaria and Romania from 1945 to 1947, in Hungary - from 1956 to 1991; ...
    3. +11
      12 March 2025 07: 44
      And what articles in this trade balance with the "strategic partner" China have you looked at. We give them gas, oil, minerals, timber. They give us underwear, socks, pants made of synthetics, various consumer goods (meat grinders, garlic presses, thermoses, locks, etc., a huge list). Spare parts for our cars, for example, but I implore you not to take these spare parts. Because, for example, there are already a lot of accidents from their ball joints. We even bought ship engines from them, but these engines are very short-lived. Bearings for a short time. Can't we produce any of this ourselves? Of course, we still can. But Mr. Potanin is moving Norilsk Nickel to China, and "Gloria Jeans" production to Indochina, it's cheaper there. Here's your "partner". However, all "partners" are like that for the "again deceived". Things have really reached the point of "de-dollarization" of trade, and now the question has arisen of where to put the billions of rupees? The Indians agree to take our resources for them, but demand dollars for their goods. Many Chinese do the same.
      1. 0
        12 March 2025 18: 04
        Quote: fiberboard
        But Mr. Potanin is moving Norilsk Nickel to China

        Potanin should be put in the same cell with Uss, and they are being given some kind of preferences...Where did Potanin get the nickel? Did it crawl out of his ass?
  3. +13
    12 March 2025 04: 56
    Oh, come on, we have one strong link, our last secret weapon that we haven't even started using yet. Our Great Schemer, he can survive in the taiga, he's swum in a bathyscaphe, and even brought storks to warmer climates, and that's just a small part of the things he can do. And foreign policy is his strong point, he said so himself, and I personally have no reason not to trust him, 87% confirm this. All a professional has to do is get down to business and everything will be fine, May 9 is coming soon, there will be a gorgeous parade near the mausoleum hastily boarded up with plywood, all the world leaders will come to us, including China, and we will once again remind the world of our strong foreign position, I'm sure that journalists will say in the broadcast that the eyes of the whole world are riveted, and our president will deftly and hoppingly pat his dear partners on the shoulders after the parade, smile, and everything will be great.
    1. -11
      12 March 2025 05: 02
      You have no analytics...just nonsense, like others who litter - by nature. You and them in the 95th quarter - to destroy the country
      1. +13
        12 March 2025 05: 41
        Are you a boor by nature, or is it your job title? He took offense at this:
        we have one strong link, our last secret weapon that we haven't even started yet
        ? Here, disgrace yourself: "Vyacheslav Volodin: Russia's advantage is not oil and gas, but Vladimir Putin." You're a bad Putinist, a bad one. Take Volodin's example.
    2. +17
      12 March 2025 06: 36
      Quote from turembo
      and everything will be fine.
      Yes, indeed... After the drunkard Yeltsin, who would have easily given up even the "Kemsk volost", anyone would have seemed like a genius and a patriot, especially with the forced PR.
      Further, you can't lie endlessly, being the "first economy of Europe", and a lot of big words with "red lines" that remained words. Yesterday on TV they told Garant how our industry is growing, thanks to sanctions, we had to do something ourselves. What a miracle! The enemies only bring us benefits, wishing harm, and the authorities, as if on the contrary, with good intentions lead the people to hell. The Central Bank of the Russian Federation lost 300 billion in foreign banks, essentially financing a foreign economy with such "storage", instead of investing this money in investments in Russian enterprises. And, nothing, Nabiullina was not shot, not even kicked out, smiles further, like an enemy agent of the IMF. "Messiah" Trump, attacked Europe and Zelensky, well, a show! Such an advanced attraction, we will directly be allies, nothing else. How much longer can we eat this noodles? They will sign a deal like this, they will adjust it to the victory of the Soviet people over Hitler, and on May 9, there will be a double holiday, a double victory. Neither Odessa nor Kyiv will become Russian, no one will disarm, there will be no bases, and NATO "peacekeepers" will enter the Nazi part of Ukraine. Then, a new war, most likely. But, "raising from the knees", hardly anyone will believe, if they even sit on their throne until the end. We will not win with them, we will not revive a great country in the selected capitalism, and Russia simply cannot be any other.
      1. +9
        12 March 2025 08: 47
        Quote: Per se.
        How long can I keep eating this noodles?

        Endlessly...
        Quote: Per se.
        Well, only, "lifting from the knees", hardly anyone will believe it anymore

        And this is not required. "The rating allows"...
      2. +3
        12 March 2025 10: 52
        Apparently nothing teaches us anything and we are ready for the hundredth time to step on the same liberal pro-Western rake, which will once again, after a certain amount of time, hit us painfully on the forehead.
        1. 0
          12 March 2025 15: 10
          Yes, the Chinese already have the expression "naive as Russians", as well as such statements on forums
    3. +8
      12 March 2025 07: 42
      and even took storks to warmer climates
      And the smelt was taken to spawn. Yes
  4. +26
    12 March 2025 05: 01
    Just yesterday, China, North Korea and Iran were praised by our media and positioned as allies. Today, Trump beckoned and, dropping everything, the "politicians of a great power" rushed to him. "Our" rulers betrayed Najibullah, Honecker, Ceausescu, then Saddam, Gaddafi, Yanukovych. I wonder if there are still those in the world who believe them? It's true, to paraphrase the saying: "Russia has no allies, it has the selfish interests of those who rule it today." All this behavior of "our elites" resembles the behavior of available ladies from Tverskaya. Only they forget how these ladies usually end their "professional careers."
    1. -19
      12 March 2025 05: 03
      "Today Trump beckoned and, dropping everything, the "politicians of a great power" rushed to him."
      Where does this nonsense come from - from some back alley?
      1. +18
        12 March 2025 05: 05
        And who suggested that Trump search for and develop deposits of rare earth metals throughout Russia?
        1. -11
          12 March 2025 05: 09
          it's been like that for many years - western and chinese companies in oil, gas, and so on. there are a lot of american companies in china, and vice versa
        2. +21
          12 March 2025 06: 22
          "And we also have aluminum" Elena Vorobey came to mind "Well, take me!" And comrade Shvonder came to mind "This is some kind of disgrace" Spanish shame..
    2. +13
      12 March 2025 06: 05
      Quote: fiberboard
      Today Trump beckoned and, dropping everything, the "politicians of a great power" rushed to him.

      So Trump showed the DPRK, Iran, China... who we are with one move, and with another move he will turn on military aid to the Banderites again. And with tripled force. And no one will feel sorry for us after that! That's how chess works.
      1. +12
        12 March 2025 06: 23
        You forgot to mention - Russia will lose the support of China, North Korea, Iran. And that's it. At the same time, the Banderas will receive ever greater amounts of weapons and finances from the West.
        As a result, complete dependence on the USA. All these Putin antics with Trump have already alarmed China.
      2. +5
        12 March 2025 11: 10
        Well, they only stopped providing assistance in words...
    3. +2
      12 March 2025 07: 08
      These Yanukovychs and Najibullahs are simply Russia's mistresses... Assad fled Syria without resistance... But according to you, thousands of our soldiers should have been killed in Syria...
      1. +10
        12 March 2025 07: 29
        Why lay down "thousands of our soldiers". Highly professional fighters of PMC "Wagner" coped with these radicals perfectly. But they were a big nuisance to someone. They were either set up for American helicopters, or taken out of Palmyra (after a concert, then they had to take Palmyra again), or they "forgot" to pass on maps of minefields, or there was a shortage of shells. Someone was haunted by their fame, success, professionalism. Well, they finished them off, and the result? Assad is in Russia, the militants are finishing off the Alawites and Christians, and are preparing to go to Russia, the "Kursk epic" has been going on for several months already.
        1. -1
          13 March 2025 00: 55
          Why lay down "thousands of our soldiers?" Highly professional fighters of the Wagner PMC dealt with these radicals perfectly well.

          A regime that is supported by foreign PMCs...
          What are the prospects for such a regime?

          Maybe it was worth starting with these questions. Why bet on a lame horse and then be surprised by the result?
          1. +1
            13 March 2025 04: 03
            What are the prospects for a regime that is based on lies, corruption, theft by officials, the sale of minerals and the interests of oligarchs? What are the prospects for a country whose leadership brought millions of migrants into this country, replacing the indigenous population, destroyed industry, and plundered the army?
      2. +9
        12 March 2025 09: 57
        Quote from Turbuta Dave
        And in your opinion, thousands of our soldiers should have been killed in Syria...

        In our opinion, it should not have come to this. How? Off the top of my head:
        First and foremost, it was necessary to finish what had been started and liberate the snake pit of Idlib. And not shout about a premature victory.
        Second. Intelligence. How could the commander of the group in Syria have missed this and not done anything preventative?
        Third. This is work with Assad himself. Direct participation in building a reliable Syrian army. Information exchange. And so on.
    4. +1
      13 March 2025 01: 04
      Only they forget how these ladies usually end their "professional careers"

      They get married to rich guys with ugly faces. They are beaming with happiness - the girl has paid attention to them, and her past, well, who is not without sin..
    5. -1
      13 March 2025 15: 18
      Quote: fiberboard
      Najibullah, Honecker, Ceausescu.,p

      Hmm, betrayed exactly No one believes them for a long time now - there is no CPSU, no Central Committee, no General Secretary.
  5. +18
    12 March 2025 05: 06
    Indeed, how many countries are left in the world that can be called allies, not situational partners, but allies? And somehow there are no such countries. All around there are only enemies or a pack of indifferent people who are only interested in our minerals, our lands. Why did this happen? It is not easy to live like this, especially if the only natural Russian allies - the army and navy do not provide protection, as daily reports say. You are sitting in your apartment .., and suddenly a fragment comes to visit ... This is not what was thought about in February 2022, then about Victory. Of course, security and respect through fear of the strong would undoubtedly be if there was an order to burn out rat holes infected with the most dangerous infection, but ... there will never be such an order for financial reasons. And now Russia is beginning to resemble a simple Russian city of the 1230-40s, behind the low and thin fortress walls of which, on the cathedral square, Knyazyushko inspires the city the people because we are Russian, we can do anything. Everything is fine, and we don't need other allied cities, there are bad other princes who behave badly. And around this city Batu's tumens are raging...
    1. +3
      12 March 2025 05: 22
      Is there anyone else who believes that there are only friends and allies around us?
      1. +13
        12 March 2025 05: 30
        The most interesting thing is that the Russian leadership also believes that Russia does not need allies in principle. But then a person does not need friends in principle. Why do they need them, why does he, a fool, look for friends? Isn't that right?
        1. +5
          12 March 2025 05: 36
          Quote: Yuri L
          Why is he looking for friends?

          Friends are not sought or ordered. They come themselves...
          1. +1
            12 March 2025 15: 17
            They have already come to us, and where are they now?
            Abkhazia - Dead weight if not a parasite.
            Armenia has moved to another camp.
            Belarus doesn't really want to act as our springboard that will be the first to be hit.
            Serbia is surrounded by, to put it mildly, unfriendly countries + has no access to the sea.
            Transnistria has no common border and local citizens also have citizenship of such countries as Romania, Ukraine, Moldova.
            China is pursuing only its own interests and doesn’t give a damn about our desires.
            India is trying to jump above its own weight.
            Vietnam has become too closely tied to the US lately.
            Iran is an ally until the need for support to conduct its own affairs ends.
            Kazakhstan has been trying to follow in Armenia's footsteps in recent years.
            1. 0
              12 March 2025 15: 20
              Quote: Ermak_415
              They have already come to us, and where are they now?

              And these were not friends, but partners, for a time, or hangers-on.
              1. 0
                12 March 2025 18: 09
                Quote from Uncle Lee
                And these were not friends, but partners, for a time, or hangers-on.

                Freeloaders... They needed Russia only so that they could have everything in abundance...
            2. 0
              Yesterday, 12: 57
              Do you think China should sacrifice its own interests to satisfy Russia's wishes? laughing
      2. +13
        12 March 2025 05: 49
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        Is there anyone else who believes that there are only friends and allies around us?

        Friends? The Kremlin wanted multipolarity! They got it.
      3. +7
        12 March 2025 07: 05
        Friends are only those who stand next to you in the phalanx line. The rest are enemies.
        1. -1
          13 March 2025 15: 23
          Quote: paul3390
          Friends are only those who stand next to you in the phalanx line. The rest are enemies.

          No one has ever stood next to the USSR
          - except Cuba and partly the GDR.
          The rest of the freeloaders 300%
    2. +9
      12 March 2025 06: 23
      Quote: Yuri L
      Indeed, how many countries are left in the world that can be called allies?

      There are no allied countries at all now. Not only Russia. Each country is looking for its own benefit from partnership and that's all.
  6. +12
    12 March 2025 05: 31
    Sabotage against Trump's economic plans is obvious. And everyone will look for a warmer place. In vain. Only hot places are prepared here. Only a classical understanding of politics will help find your way.
  7. +14
    12 March 2025 05: 32
    China's special envoy for European affairs Lu Shaye said on Thursday that he was "appalled" by the way President Donald Trump had treated American allies in Europe, adding that a peace deal for Ukraine should not be determined by the United States and Russia alone.

    Lou Shaye didn't say that, it's a Ukrainian propaganda leak. He didn't mention Ukraine at all, he just said he was shocked by how Trump communicates with his allies in Europe. By the way, this politician said in 2023 that "the sovereignty of the former Soviet republics is questionable." wink
    The idea that the US might enter into an alliance with Russia against China is quite optimistic.

    In general, this is a tracing of Brzezinski's words, grandfather wanted Russia to commit suicide on China to please the Americans, at least to ensure equidistance between the Russian Federation - China - Iran, since it was not possible to quickly weaken the Russian Federation, so now they are pushing one of the narratives - the Chinese are enemies, the Americans are friends... After the strikes with American weapons on targets in the Russian Federation, after the Americans killed on Russian territory, to consider such a thing seriously... well, I don't know, decide for yourself fool
  8. +13
    12 March 2025 05: 42
    I agree with the author, China, unlike the DPRK, has never helped and will never help Russia. Neither in economic development nor in military-political terms. On the contrary, at every opportunity it tries to cheat us, while smiling and singing praises.
    1. +3
      12 March 2025 09: 55
      Quote: Mar. Tira
      China, unlike the DPRK, has never helped and will not help Russia.

      The DPRK won't lift a finger without China's go-ahead.
      1. +1
        13 March 2025 02: 39
        No way, they also have more than enough contradictions, and for some reason China does not invest much in the DPRK. And all because their ideologies have become too different. In China, communism is only on paper, a special one with a touch of capitalism, which is not the case in the DPRK. The Chinese leader has never met Kim Jong-un during his entire time in power, and what's more, he despises him.
        1. 0
          Yesterday, 13: 02
          https://youtu.be/v4ctZcqnhUA Вы ошибаетесь. bully
    2. +1
      12 March 2025 18: 13
      Quote: Mar. Tira
      I agree with the author, China, unlike the DPRK, has never helped and will not help Russia.

      China is a situational partner, but who offered its neck to it so that it could sit on it and dangle its legs? Note that we are alive thanks to Chinese consumer goods...
      But where did we get our Turkish partner from? Why are we still fixated on Israel, as if it were our ally?
      1. -1
        13 March 2025 02: 34
        Well, why so categorically, hello! We are alive not thanks to China, but let's say it has become a little more convenient to live. Remoteness from the center of the Far East and untimely solution of problems are the main reasons for China's expansion. Israel is not our ally, but not our enemy either. There are also many of our brothers there, although they are inactive. And now it seems that our positions in Syria are converging, and what will happen in the near future?
  9. +9
    12 March 2025 05: 47
    If China is seeking rapprochement and alliance with the EU, which is hostile to Russia, then why should Russia refuse lucrative offers from the US, if any such suddenly arrive?

    If such are received... And if they are not received? And why was not the option considered, when everyone is against Russia: both the USA and China? That is, the USA will receive favorable offers. But not to us, but to China against us. How is that an option? And then, having finished us off, they will take on China. Or do you think that it is only possible to deceive us, but China is in no way possible?
  10. +9
    12 March 2025 05: 51
    And Pindostan is not our friend, and China is "just like that".
  11. +10
    12 March 2025 06: 20
    I have always believed that China is a major geopolitical competitor of Russia, which also has territorial claims to it, although not in an open form, for now. It does not need a strong Russia at all. The Ukrainian conflict turned out to be very opportune for the further strengthening of China's economy on the blood of Slavic peoples. It has not shown itself to be an ally of Russia at all. Then Russia is more related to European civilization, not Asian. So there are no prerequisites for rapprochement between China and Russia.
    1. +2
      12 March 2025 06: 32
      He has not shown himself to be an ally of Russia at all.

      Do you want to compare the actions of the US and China? wink
      1. +7
        12 March 2025 07: 04
        In this case, I expressed my opinion about China as a possible ally of Russia, which turned out to be so-so. But you are substituting the thesis. I can only say one thing, that Russia has much fewer geopolitical contradictions with the USA than with China.
        1. +1
          12 March 2025 07: 08
          I can only say one thing: Russia has far fewer geopolitical contradictions with the United States than with China.

          Are you serious? If anything, yesterday the drones with which Ukraine launched a massive attack on the Russian Federation were assembled from foreign components using American money, by people trained by Americans using American money, among other things fool
          What more contradiction do you need?
          Let's turn the situation 180 degrees, the question is - in a possible conflict between China and the US at sea, will Russia stop selling oil/gas to Europe, an American ally?
          1. +7
            12 March 2025 07: 28
            Have you ever asked yourself why China hasn't taken advantage of Russia's current difficulties and taken a piece of the Far Eastern pie? Nuclear weapons? Unlikely. The US would never allow this, since they don't need China's strengthening. Geopolitics is a very complicated thing.
            1. +4
              12 March 2025 07: 38
              Nuclear weapons? Unlikely.

              1. You still haven't answered the question.
              2. The Treaty on Good-Neighborliness, Friendship and Cooperation between the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China was signed July 16 2001 year.
              Question: Why do you consider China an enemy when the Chinese are signing a peace treaty with us, and the Americans are waging war with the help of others? wink
              3. The reasons are as simple as mooing, we have a common enemy, so the Chinese are reducing their ground forces, but are vigorously developing their aviation and navy, building artificial islands, creating an A2/AD zone, preparing to fight at sea.
              1. +11
                12 March 2025 07: 49
                Well, Hitler also signed a non-aggression pact with the USSR and then easily broke it. It is naive in our time to believe some piece of paper if it is not backed up by force. China has already tried to solve territorial problems with the USSR by force and this should not be forgotten.
                1. +1
                  12 March 2025 07: 53
                  It is naive in our time to believe some piece of paper if it is not backed up by force.

                  1. It seems I will never get an answer to the question I asked? Okay. wink
                  2. So these pieces of paper are backed by military force, the modern one - by nuclear force, and the non-aggression pact - by the force of the Red Army. Hitler, having attacked the USSR, lost all his advantages and committed suicide, having wasted his own country. Do you think people learn from the mistakes of others or not?
                  1. +8
                    12 March 2025 08: 04
                    Drones are also assembled using Chinese components. So here there is parity with the USA. China religiously observes anti-Russian sanctions, does not recognize Crimea, sells goods of poor quality, and buys energy resources for next to nothing. What is it that you like about it?
                    1. +3
                      12 March 2025 08: 15
                      What did you like about him so much?

                      I compare them, the USA and China.
                      If China complied with anti-Russian sanctions, it would not sell us communication systems, drones, components for them, vehicles and much more. The Ukrainians can buy Chinese components through intermediaries, but we deliver by land, across the common border.
                      Parity - this is when the Chinese will supply weapons to Ukraine, train Ukrainian military personnel, when Chinese mercenaries will fight on the side Ukrainians. stop
                      1. +5
                        12 March 2025 09: 03
                        I compare them, the USA and China.

                        And how do they differ in relation to us?
                        Sanctions are economic pressure. Both sides influence us. Yes, to varying degrees.
                        They provide "help" to our opponent without taking our position into account. Yes, to varying degrees.
                        Both sides do not want Russia to become stronger.
                        At the same time, China has territorial claims to Upper Manchuria. Their interests in Asia are absolutely contrary to ours.
                      2. 0
                        12 March 2025 09: 13
                        And how do they differ in relation to us?

                        That the Americans literally want and do kill Russians, if you have a short memory, then let me remind you - tanks with swastikas in the Kursk region appeared with American money and military aid from NATO countries, where the US dominates. The Chinese sign a treaty on good neighborliness and observe it, and the Americans fight with the hands of a proxy country, it seems nothing complicated, everything is on the surface?
                        At the same time, China has territorial claims to Upper Manchuria.

                        What kind of country is this? Upper Manchuria? Where, when and to whom in the Russian Federation did China make territorial claims?
                      3. +6
                        12 March 2025 09: 18
                        And what about Father Damansky? They were also going to kill Russians then. Only then China got it in the teeth, then they started hysterics that the USSR was planning to bomb Beijing with a nuclear weapon. And with the signing of the good-neighborly treaty there was a demarcation of the Russian-Chinese border.
                        Upper Manchuria is a geographical designation of the region. There is another city there. Haishenwei, as the Chinese say.
                      4. -1
                        12 March 2025 09: 22
                        And what about Fr. Damansky?

                        Doesn't it bother you at all that it was more than half a century ago, that some changes have taken place since then? That is, the conflict of 1969 and the strikes on the Russian Federation with American weapons, according to American intelligence and with the help of American control and communications equipment - are they the same thing? good
                        Upper Manchuria is a geographical designation of the region.

                        So you continue on, gwhere, when and to whom PRC made territorial claims to the Russian Far East?
                      5. +2
                        12 March 2025 09: 37
                        It doesn't bother me at all. What happened once will happen again. Doesn't it?
                        Was the demarcation done out of thin air? Were there no claims from China? Were all satisfied?
                        So what's the difference? Both are enemies. It's just that the Chinese monkey sits in a tree by the river. Waits and eats.
                      6. 0
                        12 March 2025 09: 43
                        Is not it so?

                        No, in order to make peace with China, the USSR/RF withdrew troops from Mongolia, Vietnam and Afghanistan, and resolved the territorial problem with Damansky Island. Yes, they are satisfied, in 2001 they signed a treaty on good-neighborliness and friendship and, characteristically, they are fulfilling it.
                        So what's the difference?

                        Again, no, the Chinese have an enemy - the USA, the confrontation in the Asia-Pacific region is just beginning, we (Russia and China) both need a quiet rear.
                      7. +2
                        12 March 2025 10: 47
                        Quote: strannik1985
                        Yes, we are satisfied; in 2001 we signed an agreement on good-neighborliness and friendship and, characteristically, we are fulfilling it.
                        Let us not forget that in October 2004, during President Vladimir Putin’s visit to China, an additional agreement was signed on the Russian-Chinese state border in its eastern part.
                        The last protocols on the demarcation of this part of the border were signed in 2008. Russia unilaterally transferred to China half of Bolshoy Ussuriysky, Tarabarov and a section on Bolshoy Island, a total of about 350 square kilometers of land.
                        Was the issue closed? No, later China made claims to 17 hectares of land in the Altai Mountains at an altitude of about three thousand meters, since it was allegedly not demarcated properly. A trifle, perhaps. The main thing is that for the demarcation, troops were withdrawn from the border by 200 kilometers, ours to the north "into the taiga" without significant infrastructure, the Chinese to the south, with a network of roads and underground tunnels leading to the border. We also lost fortified areas. What else can be said, who is more of a friend or an enemy? ... It was not the Chinese who imposed sanctions on us, and it was not the Chinese who imposed a colonial constitution on us, after the collapse of the USSR, with the direct participation of the United States.
                        If China is not our friend, then the USA was, is and will be only an enemy. Also, communists are in power in China, and China could possibly be a greater ally for us if the henpecked oligarchs in Russia were replaced by people's power and socialism. However, for the unique China, a war between socialist countries is not an impossible action...
                        We need to become stronger ourselves, and not rely on strong friends and patrons. Russia is not Switzerland, we cannot remain in the shadows.
                      8. +1
                        12 March 2025 11: 24
                        Don't forget that by this time, in October 2004,

                        You have simplified this greatly, if we do not go into too much detail, then according to the agreement on the Soviet-Chinese border from 1991, signed by Gorbachev, the border on the Amur should pass along the main fairway of the river, which automatically made many islands previously controlled by the USSR Chinese territory. However, this agreement did not regulate the dispute over the islands near Khabarovsk, so in 2004 the islands were divided according to landmarks on the ground - the northern side of Bolshoy Ussuriysky to us, the southern to China. And most importantly, Russia and China resolved these issues through negotiations, no one sponsored terrorists, did not impose sanctions, did not look for more proxies for a war with the Russian Federation.
                        The main thing is that troops were withdrawn 200 kilometers from the border for the demarcation

                        It doesn't matter at all, the main deterrent against both NATO and China is the strategic nuclear forces. For example, in 2010, the total number of ground forces of the NAOC was 1,6 million people, 44 infantry/motorized infantry/motorized, 9 tank, 6 artillery divisions, 12 tank, 13 motorized infantry/mechanized, 20 artillery brigades, 7 army aviation regiments, not counting the airborne forces, local troops and those not part of the ground forces. In the Beijing Military District alone there are 47 combat brigades, in our Far East during the same period there were 29 brigades, of which 28 were combat (excluding the PULAD on Sakhalin).
                        We need to become stronger ourselves.

                        No one argues with this, it’s just that Russia physically won’t be able to be at odds with everyone; the USSR had a hard time doing this either.
                      9. 0
                        Yesterday, 13: 15
                        Did Russia consider China's position when agreeing to sell Su-57 fighters to India?

                        At least China is not supplying weapons to Russia's adversaries.

                        Compared to this, China is already quite friendly. laughing
                      10. 0
                        14 March 2025 00: 03
                        I compare them, the USA and China.
                        Well, you can compare Germany and Japan in certain years. We fought to the death with one, sold oil from Sakhalin to the other. The Japanese paid for the oil, probably supplied something in return. Were the Japanese our allies then? Do you know where you can see such allies? lol
                        We now think that the US was a so-so ally, they helped little, wanted something for lend-lease. But the Chinese are not allies at all, a neutral power, like Switzerland, which supplied condensed milk to both the Germans and the Americans, for money. I don't consider shop assistants to be either allies or friends because they deign to sell me goods for money that I pay in advance.
                      11. 0
                        14 March 2025 06: 23
                        Well, you can compare Germany and Japan in certain years.

                        Let's compare. Japan extracted oil on Sakhalin under a concession agreement, i.e. the Union itself invited them, because the Japanese could train personnel, conduct exploration, and generally organize the extraction itself; under the concession, all explored areas were divided 50/50. Japanese extraction was steadily declining, because Japan had fought several wars with the USSR and, in principle, abandoned plans to conquer the Soviet Far East due to a lack of forces and the oil embargo. And Japan was tolerated, because the situation in the West was difficult, and more cargo was delivered via the Far East via the L-L than via the rest of the world combined. We have a good-neighborly agreement with China, the conflict was in 1969, did I miss anything?
                        I don't consider shop assistants to be either allies or friends because they deign to sell me goods for money that I pay in advance.

                        Sorry, but this is a classic log and speck. We are friends for a reason, the Chinese are preparing for war in the same way, Trump wants to dump Ukraine on providing for Europe, he cut USAID, he is even cutting the amount of aid to Egypt in order to transfer efforts to the Asia-Pacific region. The question is - when they have a mess, will our business also sell resources to the US and its allies, since it is doing it now? At the official level, China does not sell UAVs to Ukraine, which does not prevent a pack of intermediaries from doing so. Are you now demanding from the Chinese what we ourselves do not do?
                      12. 0
                        14 March 2025 13: 24
                        Let's compare.
                        So what's the conclusion? Is Japan an ally or maybe a ***prisoner? wassat They were forced to tolerate each other. And by the same logic, during the Cold War, the USSR had allies all around, and everyone sold something.
                        Sorry, but this is a classic log and speck.
                        This is a classic case of turning a log in someone else's eye into a speck. Are the Americans preparing to attack China? They've been talking about it openly for 15 years. What about China? It had a falling out with all its neighbors over tiny islands. The Americans are now placing missile launchers on the territory of these neighbors so that these reclaimed islands could be washed back into the ocean if necessary. In fact, the Americans didn't get tiny islands, but large islands a little further away. And what about China? That's right, everyone around is wrong, but it's a good guy, it's led by multi-move players who supply China's enemies with drones in order to fight China's few semi-allies - Russia and Myanmar, for example. The Americans sacrificed their auto industry and switched to Toyotas, Persians and Lamborghinis, having received allies for the Cold War. China would hang itself for a penny.
                        By the way, the Russian Federation participated in exercises with the Chinese to blockade Taiwan. And what does China want in return? Is it ready to buy oil at a discount? Well, definitely - allies!
                      13. 0
                        14 March 2025 13: 39
                        Well, what's the conclusion?

                        Very simple, Japan and China are not comparable, completely different conditions.
                        And by the same logic, during the Cold War, the USSR

                        You have interesting logic, apparently the conflict on Damansky passed you by?
                        And what about China?

                        Well, who cares, China provides us with a quiet rear and supplies electronics, at the moment, when China has a direct armed conflict with the USA, we will also sell to those who want anything, from gas/oil to titanium products.
                      14. 0
                        14 March 2025 14: 59
                        Very simple, Japan and China are not comparable, completely different conditions.
                        quite comparable, neither of them were and are allies
                        You have interesting logic, apparently the conflict on Damansky passed you by?
                        and before and after they traded - temporarily stopped being allies. You are confusing neutral countries and allies. It's like saying that someone has five hundred friends, well, that's how many are listed on VKontakte. Although there are no friends there
                        Well, I don't care, China provides us with a quiet rear and supplies electronics
                        and we provide China with rear support and supply free resources, lure American weapons to ourselves. Trump has something to offer our profiteers, and China is ready to buy them out? Why do the Americans have rich and poor allies with an economy comparable to China's (the real one is even smaller), while China only has poor allies who are getting it from Chinese enemies, and China has nothing to do with it at all and trades with everyone? Are they not concerned about anything except immediate gain? Is there a beam in their eye?
                      15. 0
                        14 March 2025 15: 15
                        quite comparable

                        Only with the first we are direct enemies, and the second can become. Was it possible to build good-neighborly relations with Japan? No, Japanese society was so frozen that the war could have been started independently by the management of the Kwantung Army or the occupation forces in China. Is it possible to build good-neighborly relations with China?
                        Before and after they traded, they temporarily stopped being allies.

                        Nothing of the sort, in order to normalize relations with China, the USSR withdrew troops from Mongolia, Afghanistan and Vietnam.
                        We provide China with rear support and free resources,

                        It is profitable for us.
                        Is there a beam in your eye?

                        Of course not, because by not selling resources we become weaker, why behave like the US? They cut off Europe from Russian gas, at the same time shifting responsibility for supply to Ukraine, as a result, production is curtailed, economically Europe becomes weaker. In fact, now the Russian Federation in Ukraine is grinding up weapons and resources of a total of 52 countries, mainly the US and Europe. Why do the Chinese need a weak ally?
                      16. 0
                        14 March 2025 17: 18
                        Only with the first we are direct enemies, but with the second we can become so.
                        What enemies? There is no war, so they are allies!
                        Is it possible to build good neighborly relations with China?
                        Are you a solipsist by any chance? Like everything depends on us and only on us, and there everything is like in a computer game - clear and objective. Does China know how to build normal allied relations? Is it going to? And it's good to arrange good-neighborly relations when the world is not heading for a world war.
                        To normalize relations with China, the USSR withdrew troops from Mongolia, Afghanistan and Vietnam.
                        All for the sake of allied relations with China? laughing
                        It is profitable for us.
                        great allied relations, we have the same with India and a bunch of other countries. Benefit!
                        Of course not, because by not selling resources we become weaker, why behave like the USA?
                        leaving enemies without resources can make enemies much weaker. Well, unless, of course, you steal money for import substitution. Twice.
                        Why do the Chinese need a weak ally?
                        Do they have a choice? Well, they can get a strong enemy on their northern border and be left without resources. What wonderful plans do the Chinese have for the planet? What place will China, Russia, and the US occupy there? It seems their plans are an eternal 2007. The Americans have and had plans for everyone, for some they are normal, for others they are terrible. In some American backwaters everything is better than in the US. Like Ireland or Switzerland. But China's plans do not extend beyond Taiwan, as if the CPC has not grown up to the boots of the Chinese economy, they are too big for it
                      17. 0
                        14 March 2025 17: 40
                        What enemies? There is no war, so they are allies!

                        This is your logic, not mine.
                        Does China know how to build normal allied relations?

                        Compare it with the USA and there will be no questions.
                        All for the sake of allied relations with China?

                        For good neighbors.
                        Leaving enemies without resources can make enemies much weaker.

                        The United States is not a major consumer of Russian energy resources.
                        Do they have a choice?

                        It's just that the CPC is populated by realists, and the Oval Office is occupied by a notorious faggot who talks a lot, does little, and gets paid even less. The Russian Federation doesn't have much choice anyway.
                      18. 0
                        14 March 2025 17: 58
                        Compare it with the USA and there will be no questions.
                        I compared several times, China has no allies. They used to talk about Pakistan, but when they had a crisis - China withdrew. Why a weak ally? It would be better to become one more weak enemy!
                        For good neighbors.
                        For the sake of good neighborly relations with China, the USSR withdrew its troops from Afghanistan? belay
                        The United States is not a major consumer of Russian energy resources.
                        And besides the USA, we don't have any enemies? Where does Lukoil sell diesel fuel from its factories?
                        It's just that the CPC is populated by realists
                        What is their realism? How many more hundreds of billions do they hold in American securities?
                      19. 0
                        14 March 2025 18: 20
                        I compared it several times, China has no allies.

                        Is there a queue behind the fence in the Russian Federation?
                        For the sake of good neighborly relations with China, the USSR withdrew its troops from Afghanistan?

                        Including.
                        And besides the USA, we don't have any enemies?

                        All of Europe.
                        What is their realism?

                        This is pragmatism: they invested papers, but received sales markets, technologies, made a breakthrough in the economy, and are expanding the domestic market.
                      20. 0
                        14 March 2025 22: 10
                        Is there a queue behind the fence in the Russian Federation?
                        there is no queue, but back in Geneva, grandfather Biden offered in 2021 in exchange for lifting sanctions against China. What did China offer? It doesn't care, pragmatism and realism
                        All of Europe.
                        Are you avoiding a real discussion like this? Are you dodging the topic of China's inadequate policy to - and Russia has a log too! So China doesn't? fool
                        This is pragmatism: they invested papers, but received sales markets.
                        They were given sales markets earlier, the money they earned was given to the US to support. Now the sales markets are being closed.
                        Technology
                        they don't give it anymore
                        made a breakthrough in the economy, expanding the domestic market
                        The Americans are planning to eliminate this. Russia is not looking for allies well, go to hell, let's sell drones to Ukraine! And let the Philippines go too! And that's it! Pragmatism looks exactly like this. When the Americans screwed Huawei, what did the Chinese do? They rushed to divide Huawei's skin. And millions of Chinese students around the world are not the children of thieving Chinese officials and businessmen, because of whom nothing will fly in the West, but true patriots and communists, because the Chinese are pragmatic and prefer not to conduct foreign policy. The experience of many millennia of lying under foreign invaders has taught them that they were rude and behaved aggressively and unculturedly laughing
                      21. 0
                        15 March 2025 06: 53
                        there is no queue, but back in Geneva grandfather Bidon suggested in 2021

                        He could say anything, in 2021 the number of shellings in Donbass increased many times over, what kind of guarantees are there if the agreements with Russia are simply not being fulfilled?
                        Is this how you avoid a real discussion?

                        Let me remind you that France, England, Germany and other countries train Ukrainian soldiers, arm and finance them, provide intelligence and information support. Against this background, China is a model of good-neighborly relations. Do our enemies want to drive disagreements into these relations? Of course!
                        they don't give it anymore

                        They do, it's business. For example, BASF is investing $10,9 billion in the construction of a production complex in Zhanjiang, Guangdong Province, Volkswagen has invested $4,22 billion in the production of electric vehicles, Hefei, Anhui Province, etc.
                        Russia is not looking for allies well, go to hell, let's sell drones to Ukraine!

                        These are civilian products that do not require an end-user certificate, there is no problem purchasing through intermediaries, but we purchase Chinese products directly, logistics are across the common border.
                      22. 0
                        Yesterday, 16: 08
                        Free resources? Before the war, China bought oil from Russia at a lower price.


                        Analysis of average annual prices for oil imports from Russia to China from 2021 to 2024


                        2021 year
                        Import volume: about 79,65 million tons (data from Chinese customs).

                        Total amount: approximately 339,3 billion yuan (~52,5 billion dollars).

                        Average price: ~4260 yuan/ton (~66 dollars/barrel).


                        2022 year
                        Import volume: about 86,2 million tons (+8,2% compared to 2021).

                        Total amount: approximately 459 billion yuan (~68 billion dollars).

                        Average price: ~5325 yuan/ton (~81 USD/barrel).

                        2023 (preliminary data for January-August)
                        Import volume: about 74 million tons (+23% compared to the same period in 2022).

                        Total amount: approximately 356 billion yuan (~50 billion dollars).
                        Projected average annual price: ~4800 yuan/ton (~73 dollars/barrel).


                        2024 (forecast)
                        Projected average price: $70-75/barrel.
                2. +1
                  12 March 2025 15: 33
                  We have long forgotten about this, but the Chinese have not. And we know it better.
            2. +8
              12 March 2025 09: 05
              Why does China need land and people on it if everything valuable can be bought for next to nothing? Gas is sold to China at 1,5 times lower than to Turkey or Europe, perhaps even cheaper... I doubt that the situation is different with other resources. The maintenance of territories for China will probably cost more than they earn on the resources they personally extract...
          2. 0
            12 March 2025 20: 40
            Quote: strannik1985
            assembled from foreign components

            From Chinese. And frontline drones, from which most of our losses are - 90% China. Chinese drones killed more than all NATO shells.
            1. 0
              13 March 2025 06: 24
              From Chinese.

              I have a counter question: when the Chinese have a row over Taiwan, will our businessmen stop selling gas/oil to the US and its allies?
              1. 0
                14 March 2025 00: 05
                when will the chinese stop fighting over taiwan
                Chinese businessmen supply drones and other electronics to the US and its allies? I'm not sure.
    2. 0
      12 March 2025 12: 29
      Then Russia still belongs more to the European civilization, and not to the Asian one.

      And this makes it easier for Russians to be assimilated into Europe. The Prussians were also closer to the "European civilization".
      Alexander Nevsky's dilemma: with the Germans against the Horde or with the Horde against the Germans.
    3. +1
      12 March 2025 15: 15
      "I have always believed that China is a major geopolitical competitor of Russia"///
      ----
      Russia's influence is based only on nuclear weapons.
      And China's influence is based on a powerful economy.
      China has effectively taken first place in the world in economic power, overtaking the United States.
      Therefore, Russia is given little importance in China’s strategic economic plans.
  12. +9
    12 March 2025 06: 38
    Our strategy is to confuse everyone, and ourselves first. No one can resist such an approach.
  13. +11
    12 March 2025 06: 46
    Russia doesn't have much choice now: either "lie down" under the US or under China. Both options are bad, which one is worse is another question. We have no allies in the world, only Belarus and the DPRK, and to some extent Iran.
    The problem is that no one in the world perceives Russia as a "strong player" anymore. Something is wrong with our foreign policy, and with our domestic policy too.
    In the end it will be - "we were deceived".
    1. +2
      12 March 2025 09: 59
      Quote: Vladimir M
      We have no allies in the world, only Belarus and the DPRK, and to some extent Iran.

      The DPRK is not an ally, it makes money off of us, Kim doesn’t care about his soldiers, there are fewer mouths to feed.
      After Syria, Iran is not an ally at all, it’s just that interests have temporarily converged.
      1. +5
        12 March 2025 10: 11
        The DPRK remembers kindness, even after decades of being spat in the face.
        Iran was a "semi-ally" even before Syria, but now...
        1. -2
          12 March 2025 10: 24
          Quote: Vladimir M
          DPRK remembers good

          You live in a world of pink ponies. DPRK is Kim Jong-un. What good does he remember from the Russian Federation or the USSR?
          What are you making up?
          1. 0
            12 March 2025 10: 43
            You shouldn't say that about the DPRK. The DPRK has always voted for Russia in the UN. Even when they spat in their face, they wiped it off and voted.
            But questions arise with Syria. It is unlikely that Assad had a "vote" in Syria, each of his officials had a "curator"...
            We remember how it all started and ended in Syria. No one even tried to bomb Barmaley for the first week, then they tried, but quickly stopped.
            Here the question arises at what level Syria was “dumped”, what forces forced this to happen and what was promised in return or not promised.
            1. -1
              12 March 2025 12: 28
              Quote: Vladimir M
              The DPRK has always voted for Russia in the UN. Even when they spat in their face, they wiped it off and voted.

              You have chosen a rather dubious indicator. You seem to think that the DPRK is pursuing an independent policy, but the DPRK is one of the "proxy" of the PRC. The DPRK is completely dependent on the PRC and at least in foreign policy follows Beijing's instructions.
              Quote: Vladimir M
              Here the question arises at what level Syria was "dumped"

              In the literal sense, no one gave up Syria. It was a coincidence. The combined forces were Assad's regular army (ordinary Sunnis led by Alawites), which was not particularly stable, Hezbollah units, the IRGC, Afghan Hazaras hired by Iran, and our troops. Assad's army fought with the IRGC behind it, Afghans and Hezbollah fought nearby, our aviation supported it from the air, and our artillery covered everything. In 2024, Hezbollah left for obvious reasons, the Afghans left, and our group was noticeably reduced. The enemy, on the contrary, increased its strength and instead of dozens of disparate gangs, united into one army under a single command.
              As a result, the instability of Assad's army made itself felt, there was nothing to stop their desertion, the IRGC was clearly not enough, and our airstrikes could not keep up with the changing situation. As a result, supporting Assad ceased to make sense and as excuses they began to blame each other, like these guys leaked, no, these guys leaked...
              1. -1
                12 March 2025 12: 51
                I pointed out that our air strikes did not begin immediately, but a week after the bandits started crawling in.
        2. 0
          14 March 2025 00: 07
          Iran was a "semi-ally" even before Syria, but now...
          There were normal relations with Iran for quite a long time; there were no aggravations for almost two hundred years.
      2. 0
        12 March 2025 14: 17
        Quote: Puncher
        it's just that our interests coincided temporarily.

        Recently there was news about microelectronics. Again our interests coincided with Iran.
  14. Eug
    +11
    12 March 2025 06: 46
    An alliance is possible between more or less equal parties, but Russia has already practically "lain down" under China. And it will supply Europe not with "high-tech" energy resources, but with products of brands well known to Europeans, the production of which was transferred to China in anticipation of cheap energy resources from Russia. Wise.
  15. +7
    12 March 2025 07: 04
    Wow! What joy! Russia and the USA in the same trench! This is probably somewhere in the perpendicular universe. We are alone in the trench. Alone. Why? Ah, think carefully, everything is on the surface.
  16. +10
    12 March 2025 07: 12
    In principle, what happened is a marker of the fact that world players have begun preparing for the active phase of dividing Russia as a World Power. Rome, Byzantium, Spain and China experienced this in their time.
    Now we need to decide: is Russia ready to be reborn as a Great Power, throwing the corpse of one of its enemies at its feet, or is it ready to ascend the scaffold on the recommendations of our Foreign Ministry and effectively swing its legs in the air as a farewell.
    The choice was abandoned in 1977, when, under the guise of pacifism, plans to defeat China as a political competitor and strategic threat were curtailed. We are reaping the results today.
  17. +11
    12 March 2025 07: 24
    Putin wants to find friends among his enemies instead of retiring.
    The current government will not raise Russia to a higher level.
    1. +6
      12 March 2025 11: 36
      Quote: Million
      The current government will not raise Russia to a higher level.

      This government doesn’t have such a task.
  18. +8
    12 March 2025 07: 41
    This is all tactics. Europe will not escape from the US. The standard scenario of the "good" and "bad" cop. As they say: choose between two evils, Russia. China has misjudged the situation. It is sticking its nose in where it is not welcome.
  19. +7
    12 March 2025 07: 57
    We live in a predatory and vile world, even children in elementary school quarrel and fight over some "resources", not to mention politicians. China has earned a lot on our energy resources at a discount, but if it wanted, it would have entered into a deal with the West behind our backs long ago, back in 2014, at Obama's urging. China would never want Russia to weaken to the level of Ukraine, a vassal of the West, and that is what we are talking about. China would also not want our country to sharply strengthen, but that is out of the question...
    1. 0
      Yesterday, 16: 19
      In fact, compared to the pre-war period, China has increased the purchase prices for Russian oil and gas. It is Russia that is getting more money from China, not China that is getting lower prices than before the war.

      Analysis of average annual prices for natural gas imports from Russia to China from 2021 to 2024
      (as of October 2023)

      2021 year
      Import volume: about 10 billion cubic meters (pipeline gas) + a small amount of LNG.

      Average price: 200-220 dollars/thousand cubic meters (pipeline gas, price under long-term contracts).
      Note: The Power of Siberia 1 gas pipeline began operating in late 2019. The price under long-term contracts is linked to oil, but the calculation formula is not disclosed. The rise in oil prices in 2021 could affect the cost of gas.

      2022 year
      Import volume: about 15,5 billion cubic meters (pipeline gas, +55% compared to 2021).

      Average price: 280-320 dollars/thousand cubic meters (pipeline gas).
      Note:

      After the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, European gas prices reached historical highs (the TTF spot price exceeded $2000/thousand cubic meters), but Chinese-Russian long-term contracts limited price growth.

      Russia could provide discounts to China to soften the impact of Western sanctions.

      2023 (preliminary data for January-September)
      Import volume: about 22 billion cubic meters (pipeline gas, +40% compared to the same period in 2022).

      Estimated average price: $260-300/thousand cubic meters.
      Note:

      A decline in global gas prices (the average annual TTF price in Europe is ~400 dollars/thousand cubic meters), but contract prices for China remain below spot prices.

      Increasing the share of settlements in yuan reduces currency risks.

      2024 (forecast)
      Estimated average price: $240-280/thousand cubic meters.

      Analysis of average annual prices for oil imports from Russia to China from 2021 to 2024


      2021 year
      Import volume: about 79,65 million tons (data from Chinese customs).

      Total amount: approximately 339,3 billion yuan (~52,5 billion dollars).

      Average price: ~4260 yuan/ton (~66 dollars/barrel).


      2022 year
      Import volume: about 86,2 million tons (+8,2% compared to 2021).

      Total amount: approximately 459 billion yuan (~68 billion dollars).

      Average price: ~5325 yuan/ton (~81 USD/barrel).

      2023 (preliminary data for January-August)
      Import volume: about 74 million tons (+23% compared to the same period in 2022).

      Total amount: approximately 356 billion yuan (~50 billion dollars).
      Projected average annual price: ~4800 yuan/ton (~73 dollars/barrel).


      2024 (forecast)
      Projected average price: $70-75/barrel.
  20. +1
    12 March 2025 08: 00
    then why should Russia refuse lucrative offers from the US if they suddenly come?
    If they do, they'll play with it and then abandon it when another administration comes to power in the US, the PRC, it's playing with Russia, but it's not abandoning it, because there's still a lot that can be had from it. However, the PRC is not the only one like that... Only Russia isn't playing with anyone.
  21. +6
    12 March 2025 08: 05
    why is this article called "analytics"?)
    pure "author's opinion", not substantiated by logical arguments based on objective facts...
    just "it seems to me, guys, that..." ))
  22. +5
    12 March 2025 08: 11
    China Ready to Enter into Alliance with EU Against Russia and US
    The author of the article, like other propagandists like him, tries to push his point of view to the masses, but forgets that:
    "It's hard to find a black cat in a dark room, especially if there isn't one there."

    China and the EU have been trading partners for many years, and China's task is to maintain this relationship, and if the US wants to leave Europe, then China is ready to enter there.
  23. +10
    12 March 2025 08: 21
    In Russia, one can often hear the opinion that China is Russia's friend. Some politicians, experts and analysts repeat over and over again the hackneyed theses that "Russians and Chinese are brothers forever" and the like.

    I wonder how bourgeois Russia, for which the profits of the bourgeoisie are above all else, can be a friend of socialist China? And at the same time
    Indeed, just six months ago it was difficult to imagine alliances such as... Russia-USA, but at the moment they seem possible.

    Does the author not expect too much from socialist China, against which the US is waging trade wars and preparing for a military confrontation?
    Or does he think that socialist China should care exclusively about the profits of Russian bourgeois?
    1. +2
      12 March 2025 08: 50
      The PRC, whatever its socio-political orientation, skillfully plays on the contradictions of the imperialists, plays and wins, but somehow the collective West can't bring itself to strangle the PRC with all sorts of sanctions. The PRC, we don't want to return to the past, to be a colony of Western powers. This is all our dream of being a country similar to tsarist Russia and the main thing is "dreams come true" (c) smile "a Russian car" even has a Chinese steering wheel (c) smile, as the Prime Minister said when inspecting the Moskvich.
    2. -2
      12 March 2025 11: 35
      It is not entirely clear how China became socialist, there is no free medicine or pensions... It is obvious that China is going its own way, but the fact that our leadership is constantly looking to the West in the hope of returning to Courchevel is very bad
      1. +1
        12 March 2025 12: 49
        Read the Constitution of China [https://asia-business.ru/law/law1/pravo/constitution/]
        Article 6. The basis of the socialist economic system of the People's Republic of China is socialist public ownership of the means of production, namely, public ownership and collective ownership.

        Article 7. The driving force of the national economy is the state economy, i.e. the socialist economy with public ownership. The state ensures the strengthening and development of the national economy.
        ...
        Article 11. ...The State allows the private sector of the economy to exist and develop within the framework established by law....

        And get to know the social security system in China better, not through bourgeois sources of disinformation.
  24. +9
    12 March 2025 08: 37
    China has never been a “friend” of Russia

    And it's strange that some people thought so.
    China is generally turning into a hegemon worse than the US, to be honest. Yes, they do not enter into armed conflicts. BUT! In other respects they behave like racketeers. They buy up entire branches of industry and economy. They force people to pay off their debts with land. All advancement is with economic pressure. China has more interests in Europe than anywhere else. It is not surprising that they will defend it.
    And we did not make any curtseys towards the USA. Everything was in a constructive form.
    1. +2
      12 March 2025 11: 01
      Otherwise they behave like racketeers.
      When you live with wolves, howl like a wolf. What did you think? Russia is a superpower, why doesn't it behave like that? Aaaaaaah, we have capitalism, with a Gagarin smile. Not like the others, a beast's grin. Do you want minerals on the cheap? Yes, please! We won't finish them ourselves, but we'll supply grain, etc., etc. We are kind, and everyone and their dog bullies us. But we have "Oreshnik". We'll beat everyone up. smile
  25. +10
    12 March 2025 08: 46
    And the goal of breaking Russia into small states has not been cancelled. Putin is Gorbachev. And everything that Putin is doing now during the SVO: building the EBN center, bringing in millions of migrants and giving them our social security, closing enterprises that work for the defense industry, etc., says that a big "boil" awaits us soon. China understands that a big redistribution is coming and is preparing in advance. Hence all the unfriendly steps towards Russia.
    "from lucrative offers from the US, if any should suddenly come in?"
    Well, when did the US ever make any good offers? Author, don't upset me!
  26. +5
    12 March 2025 09: 44
    An example of "partnership" with China is the auto industry. During the SVO, the Chinese filled our country with their carts, which are assembled in China. Only Haval is assembled here, and that was opened back in 2019.

    I don't believe that China will become a superpower on the level of the USSR (it is a great power, of course). The Union had an ideology and allies. China sees itself as a middle empire surrounded by barbarians. This hasn't changed in 2 years.
    1. -1
      12 March 2025 11: 13
      The Union had an ideology and had allies.

      Until 1945, only the Tuvan People's Republic and the Mongolian People's Republic.
      surrounded by barbarians
      What's wrong? It's the lot of civilized nations to fight among themselves, in the Middle East, in Europe, the North-West Front, we don't touch it, that's different. And Yugoslavia? That's not barbarism. Libya is also not barbarism. I won't even mention the rest of Africa.
  27. +3
    12 March 2025 09: 48
    Here, mostly adults who understand politics, THERE ARE NO FRIENDS. There are partners, the leaders of each country are an ordinary living person who decides the policy of his country.
  28. 0
    12 March 2025 10: 17
    Mr. Biryukov, a welcome realpolitik voice to counteract the ceaseless kumbaya-Eurasian drivel of Pepe Escobar. In geopolitics there are no friends, only convergent interests that, with time, invariably tip into divergence. FSD
  29. +4
    12 March 2025 10: 19
    China and the EU have no reason for conflict, but common opponents have emerged – the US and Russia
    The EU is the US's adversary, fantastic. I just want to ask where the author gets his inspiration from. The entire Western elite has been on the US's hook for decades and does whatever they are told. To not see this, you have to look somewhere into space. The fact that they are now demonstratively hysterical against Trump does not mean at all that they are against the US, and tomorrow, on command, they can start licking his boots. You just have to understand that Trump does not give the orders, he carries them out himself.
    Therefore, to declare that the EU is an adversary of the USA is a real revelation, only from somewhere above.
  30. -2
    12 March 2025 10: 20
    China is now in a rather tempting position. Trump, having decided to reconsider relations with Europe, began too zealously, he needed to replace the European "elite" with "his own", but apparently there is no time for this. As a result, a gap has occurred that China can take advantage of. IF! China now interferes in the "reconciliation" process and offers Kyiv "better" conditions than the United States, then Trump will be left with nothing and lose Europe. Does China have leverage over Russia? Much more than the United States. Many times over. And these are not phony sanctions. As a peacemaker, Xi will receive maximum benefits from Ukraine, including contracts for the restoration of infrastructure, i.e. China will easily gobble up Ukraine to applause, and then...
    1. 0
      12 March 2025 11: 18
      By the way, the PRC was going to buy Motor Sich, which was torn apart by hazelnuts, but then something got stuck. It didn't work out. And in the end it turned out "so don't get it, nobody will have you" (c)
      1. 0
        12 March 2025 11: 20
        Quote: parusnik
        Not fused.

        Things didn't work out at some plant, but now you can take over the whole country. The stakes are higher.
        1. 0
          12 March 2025 11: 26
          I'm not talking about the plant not working out, but about "don't let anyone have you". How could we not have to involve China with its investments and projects to restore Donbass? Or should we give up the entire Donbass for the construction of human anthills? And who will we settle there, in the human anthills?
  31. 0
    12 March 2025 10: 33
    It is not advantageous for China to distance itself from Russia. And in the opposite direction as well. If we run away, they will devour us one by one. The Chinese understand this very well. In addition, the economies of the countries are complementary. The Kremlin may not be as smart as the leadership of the Celestial Empire, but most likely it also understands something. China is playing on the contradictions of the US and Europe - that's true. But for us - it will not work out that way. We can play on the contradictions within the EU, this is real and we need to do this. And the end of SVOI is again in the fog.
  32. +2
    12 March 2025 10: 36
    China is always ready to stab Russia in the back.
    1. +2
      12 March 2025 11: 22
      Quote: Ezekiel 25-17
      China is always ready to stab Russia in the back.

      Everyone is up in arms.. laughing In the East - yellow-faces, in the West - faggots, in the South - chumps...
      There is only one holy people left in the world, who destroyed their own country in 1991 in peacetime under the leadership of Chubais and Gaidars....
  33. 0
    12 March 2025 11: 25
    China Ready to Enter into Alliance with EU Against Russia and US

    policy of checks and balances on the world stage...
    on the internal side - further development of the well-being of the real...
  34. 0
    12 March 2025 11: 33
    China is a huckster. That says it all!
  35. -1
    12 March 2025 11: 41
    Regarding the "disagreements" between the US and the EU, here - lovers quarrel only to amuse themselves. They are one gang. And for us, wherever you throw a wedge, there is always a wedge. Long live 25 years of "geopolitical chess" games.
  36. -1
    12 March 2025 11: 52
    Among foreign countries, Russia has only one real ally - the DPRK.
  37. -1
    12 March 2025 12: 27
    We have a huge trade turnover with China, and transit to Europe goes through our territory, we will soon launch the Northern Sea Route, China is an economic ally of Russia, this is very beneficial for it.
  38. -1
    12 March 2025 12: 33
    China is as always wonderful with its classic strategy: "To hell with friends, to hell with girlfriends, I'm my own cool friend."
  39. 0
    12 March 2025 12: 33
    China has always tried to comply with sanctions against Russia – for example, last fall, one of the largest Chinese banks, Bank of China, began blocking payments from countries friendly to Russia if there was suspicion that they were connected to Russian companies.

    1. Thanks mainly to China, Russia was able to overcome the "sanctions from hell" of the entire West, led by the USA, avoid economic collapse and develop its military-industrial complex.
    2. Moreover, Russia never lost 300 billion dollars if they were in Chinese banks, and not Western ones.
    In addition, he always tried to make money from the war, selling drones to both Ukraine and Russia.

    What did Russia do before February 2022? They wanted to join NATO, but they didn't take them. They wanted to build a missile defense system for the West, but their "partners" didn't want to.
    They "favored" Russia only by building them an ISS and servicing their astronauts for 10 years.
    And who did Russia want to join NATO against?
    Of course they "cheated", "cheated" and so on. Why did the US deceive, but China will not deceive? Because the US wants world hegemony and has not yet abandoned this desire. They only realized that they have swung beyond their powers and temporarily want to retreat to something. But China has not had, does not have and will not have a desire for world hegemony.
    If, after everything that happened after 2022, the West again deceives Russia because of its unrequited love for the West, it will be its fatal mistake. It will take Kyiv's place with all the consequences.
  40. +1
    12 March 2025 13: 46
    Quote: th.kuzmichev
    Should we have gone the other way? Calmly watch as children are killed in Donbass?

    It was necessary to start earlier, and not play games with the cheaters from the EU and Ukraine. And now for the fourth year the second army of the world is picking on the sincere Cossacks. And the EU is watching and thinking that if the economy is transferred to a military footing, then Russia can be...
  41. +5
    12 March 2025 14: 06
    What friends are the Chinese for us??? Almost the same as the Turks!!! Don't be naive, they are a very insidious nation. They need to be kept at a distance and only for your own benefit. Look how many losses we have because the Chinese sell drones to pigs. There is NO other way!!!
    1. 0
      Yesterday, 16: 37
      China sold only civilian goods to Ukraine, while Russia sold large quantities of military equipment to India and Vietnam.

      Compared to Russia, China acts with a clear conscience"
  42. +1
    12 March 2025 15: 21
    The article's content is more like a provocation aimed at destroying relations between Russia and China. I would like to remind those who have memory problems that joint naval exercises involving ships from Russia, China and Iran are currently taking place. It is the joint patrols of strategic bombers from Russia and China that periodically take place near US territory. It is the convertible yuan currency that helps Russia carry out currency transactions for trade deals. At the same time, it is necessary to remember that in politics there are no friends, but only fellow travelers until they reach the desired turn.
    1. 0
      12 March 2025 15: 28
      It is precisely because they want to set us at odds with China that I do not publish what the Chinese say about us on their forums. But my illusions have diminished.
  43. 0
    12 March 2025 15: 56
    Now we must take the position of a smart monkey. We observe the confrontation between the US and China, extracting maximum benefit for ourselves.
  44. 0
    12 March 2025 16: 06
    China is looking for potential partners all over the world... Some of the partners are especially "partner-friendly", and some are not so much. Chinese diplomacy is a special phenomenon. But the PRC will not enter into an exchange, exchanging the distant EU for close Russia, with which there are very profitable raw materials projects. Now China simply really needs cheap gas. And Russia gives it to China. China's policy is thought out. Abrupt changes in the political vector are not a characteristic feature of China. Nevertheless, we will see.
  45. 0
    12 March 2025 16: 14
    Quote from vldmrom
    What kind of friends are the Chinese to us??? Almost the same as the Turks!!! Don't be naive, they are a very insidious nation. They need to be kept at a distance and only for their own benefit. Look how many losses we have because the Chinese sell drones to pigs.

    "Chinese" have proven by their actions that they are no less, but rather more friends of Russians than the Russians are their friends. And not because one nation is treacherous and another is honest. What is worth only perestroika and betrayal of all friends and allies.
    No, the "Chinese" understood before the Russians that China's interests coincide with Russia's interests and will not allow the US to achieve world hegemony. This is a common benefit for both the Russians and the "Chinese".
  46. 0
    12 March 2025 17: 24
    My views on China and relations with it completely coincide with the opinion of the author of the article. I would like to note that the arms supplies from China during the war in Afghanistan are still fresh in my memory. In my opinion, China (for any country) is such a "friend" that at any moment it can plunge a dagger into the back. And I am also concerned about the build-up of China's nuclear potential. Why would such a peace-loving state, as China presents itself to the world community, not only possess nuclear weapons, but also systematically increase its arsenal of nuclear weapons?
    1. 0
      Yesterday, 16: 43
      Between 1979 and 1989, China and the Soviet Union were in a state of confrontation. Therefore, China and the USSR were not friends in those years: China did not support the USSR and certainly was not the "ally that stabs in the back"
  47. 0
    12 March 2025 17: 54
    China is not with us ideologically. That says it all. Even when we were the USSR, they had questions for us. What's the matter? Live normally and that's it. But no, they have questions for us.
  48. 0
    12 March 2025 18: 06
    "...However, let us finally ask ourselves one more question: if China is striving for rapprochement and an alliance with the EU, which is hostile to Russia, then why should Russia refuse advantageous offers from the US, if such suddenly arrive?.."

    ...They will arrive today...
    TOMORROW... - THEY WILL RETREAT...

    ...There is no need to react so nervously to the banal machinations of geopolitical enemies...
    You are not Masha Zakharova...))))))))))
  49. +1
    12 March 2025 18: 27
    However, let us finally ask ourselves one more question: If China is seeking rapprochement and alliance with the EU, which is hostile to Russia, then why should Russia refuse lucrative offers from the US, if such suddenly arrive?

    However, it would be more useful to ask the question: why did Viktor Biryukov suddenly get the idea that China is betraying Russia, despite the fact that the Russian leadership has stated that relations between Russia and China are not subject to revision?
    The EU has a million citizens, Russia has less than 150 million...Who is it more profitable to trade with? Russia also drove everything possible and impossible to the West, until it was turned away...
    Why is no one hanging the Russian leadership by the collar, which has made so many mistakes and blunders?
  50. 0
    12 March 2025 21: 19
    then why should Russia refuse lucrative offers from the US if they suddenly come?
    And what proposals did the US make? The bottom line is a demand for a 30-day truce with the fulfillment of Ukraine's demands. And Ukraine, through Zelensky and Yermak, almost immediately after the Ukrainian-American talks in the Middle East, outlined its demands in the form of the expulsion of all Russians from Crimea and Donbass. China supplies Russia with everything it needs. [quote Beijing could have used the situation in Ukraine to improve relations with Russia, create an alliance with it, take it, so to speak, "under its wing."][/quote] Putin has been supplying weapons to China's geopolitical opponents since 2014, despite the conflict in Ukraine: to India, Vietnam, Myanmar. When the Chinese directly asked Putin during Trump's election whether Russia would become an enemy of China and an ally of the US if the US reduced its support for Ukraine and open special operations to cultivate Russophobia, Putin himself avoided answering. Until the end of 2023, there was a direct ban on the use of Chinese industrial electronics in the mining sector of Russia, despite the fact that Chinese equipment with the same quality is 3 times cheaper. Relaxations were made only when Schneider sold out the main stocks in warehouses in Russia imported on the eve of the SVO.
  51. +1
    12 March 2025 23: 12
    Quote: th.kuzmichev
    They always said that there are friends - the Army and the Navy.

    If you always say halva, your mouth won't get any sweeter.
    The same is true with the army. To make it a friend, you don't have to talk about it, you have to invest in it (and not in your own pocket).
  52. 0
    13 March 2025 03: 47
    If this happens, it means they took us for a ride, the Americans won’t screw Europe, but they will set us against China, and we don’t have anything of our own, what are we going to do guys, it will be a mess.
  53. 0
    13 March 2025 06: 10
    There will be no offers from the young dying vampire of the USA... because even if we give all the blood, he will die 10 years later, and we will immediately
  54. 0
    13 March 2025 07: 02
    Before the 80th year, the alliance between the USSR and the USSR would cause miracles. Izmakna SASch from Great Depression, the industrializer of the USSR, divide the light into spheres for influence. Why are there so many different things today?
  55. 0
    13 March 2025 08: 09
    I read it, a lot of letters. I just wasted my time. One Chinese guy said something somewhere, the rest is fantasy.
  56. 0
    13 March 2025 10: 28
    Read the comments of businessmen connected with the Chinese on the Internet, these narrow-eyed scumbags can screw you over without explaining the reasons, situational partners who don't hesitate to break the rules... You just need to throw Putin a gimmick that an American base could appear near Blagoveshchensk...
  57. 0
    13 March 2025 13: 37
    VO has spoken about the truth many times, but in our homeland it is not accepted.... everything is exactly about cleaning the barrels with brick chips
    In the whole world, we have only two faithful ally - our army and navy. All the rest at the first opportunity will turn against us.

    Russian Tsar Alexander III Alexandrovich
  58. 0
    13 March 2025 17: 11
    China is not so stupid as to find itself surrounded, as it was 50 years ago.

    The proposals to Europe are also understandable, because it is a big market for China after America. Only Europe is throwing China out of there... But China thinks that since America started trade wars against Europe, China can fish here. Everything is logical.
    But I repeat - in China they are not so stupid as to have enemies in the North, South, West and East.
  59. 0
    13 March 2025 18: 40
    Let's start from the "stove"... Who was the first to declare a "faithful friend and strategic partner, in the person of China"? That's right, it was Russia... A tactical move? Most likely... Dear comrade Xi avoided such clearly class-related formulations in every possible way, especially in public and on record... Replacing specific formulations with more "streamlined" ones or those having a double meaning or a certain subtext... Russia "swallowed" all this, "appeasing" its "friend" with luxurious discounts on everything and everyone, to the detriment of its own financial and economic benefit... The Chinese "lawlessness" could have quietly continued further, but then Donald Fredovich "came in" with his grandiose plans and "wants" regarding China and Russia's role in the American-Chinese "gambit", which pushed the Chinese leadership to "designate" its own plans and "wants" in the European theater of economic and financial actions... And, as it turns out, in the Chinese "gambit" (from China's side), Russia is generally "not envisaged" as a strategic partner, not as a "friend" for all times, but, "taken into account" only as a source of cheap hydrocarbons, mineral raw materials and food... As they say, "we've arrived"! Hence the Chinese "indistinctness" in defining Russia's role in the fight against European-American fascism, hidden and obvious "footrests" (on the part of China) in economic cooperation... It is possible that everything said above is due to ignorance of Chinese-Russian relations, as such, hidden from the eyes of the average Russian... And, in fact, they are in "chocolate" up to their "least"... But facts are stubborn things... China stopped considering Russia its teacher, main partner and strategic "player" of world level after, after the collapse of the USSR, the self-dissolution of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Russia's rejection of communist ideology and betrayal of countries friendly to it (the USSR)... China realized that it would be forced to "rake in the wool" in this modern world, in proud solitude, but with a modernized communist ideology and on the technologies and investments of the West + the USA... It took a risk... And, oddly enough, it turned out pretty good... True, with the costs of the personnel "plan", which the respected comrade Xi is currently struggling with... And, all the plans, money and "wants" of China, including comrade Xi, unfortunately, are in Europe, the USA, in Southeast Asia and, by no means, in Russia... So let's not be surprised by the Chinese "gambit", but draw certain conclusions regarding the "buddies"... As the Eastern truth says: you sow the wind (of betrayal), you reap the storm (of distrust and rejection)... Although I admit that this material about China is a banal "fake", in order to quarrel China and Russia on the eve of the Ukrainian and geopolitical "squabbles" between Russia and the USA... Let's see, time will put everything in its place...
  60. 0
    14 March 2025 15: 26
    China has never been a "friend", neither for the USSR, nor for today's Russia. The cunning Chinese have always kept their noses in the wind when it was advantageous for them, as they say: "nothing personal, just business", so Russia should also do small dirty tricks to China, as it does to us in the banking sector and by supplying drones to the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Putin knows about this, but he can't say anything, because he doesn't want to be left alone with the whole world hostile to Russia, and the Chinese can instantly become hostile, because they want to dominate in this region and push Russia aside. China is fishing in the muddy waters of political contradictions. It doesn't care about Russia and it sees Russia as an object of its own benefit, simultaneously doing harm to it where it is advantageous for it. This is a good lesson for us. It is not for nothing that they say: "Don't have a hundred friends, have a hundred rubles", then you will be in chocolate, which is what China is demonstrating. Nothing personal, just business. No need for sentimentality here.
    1. 0
      Yesterday, 16: 59
      Russians are annoyed that China is selling civilian goods to Ukraine
      At the same time, the Russians have been supplying military equipment to India and Vietnam for a long time. Haha.
  61. 0
    15 March 2025 10: 42
    China saw the weakness of Russia, the weakness of the Russian army, which has not been able to cope with Ukraine for 3 years, the incompetence of the Russian leadership, the corruption of the government. In the East and everywhere else, they do not befriend the weak, they milk them. It is funny to hear "take Russia under their wing" ... Only the Soviet legacy keeps China and other countries from capturing Russia - nuclear galoshes that can possibly fly to their target. The current government has stolen, ruined everything that was (production) and also demonstrated this to the whole world. Who will "be friends" with such people?
    1. 0
      Yesterday, 10: 59
      the ability to wage a protracted war for 3 years, relying on one's own forces, is not a weakness...
  62. 0
    15 March 2025 18: 42
    What difference does it make what kind of master you have as a monkey pulling chestnuts out of the fire?
  63. 0
    16 March 2025 07: 21
    China is for itself. Everyone who has ever worked with the Chinese knows this. But to achieve specific goals, it can cooperate with anyone. But cooperation between China, the EU, and the US + Russia is an oxymoron. Because even though Russia has a peculiar government, they are not idiots and will never enter into an alliance with the US against China, just as China and the US will never enter into an alliance with Russia. The result of such an alliance will only be the sequence in which the Americans "eat" Russia or China first.
    Only joint actions in economics, politics and some other areas of the Russian Federation and the PRC will allow them to more or less effectively resist US expansion.
  64. DO
    0
    16 March 2025 13: 32
    The author is right that states are by nature mega-egoists.
    Trump, in his quest to "make America great again"©, seems to be determined to implement a variation of Roosevelt's international policy in WWII toward Russia and Europe. Namely, at the very least, not to prevent the escalation of the global military conflict between Europe and Russia, for starters on the grounds of Ukraine. And to take the position of the "third rejoicing"©, which brought the US the position of world hegemon after WWII.
    China's interest here is completely understandable. The US hegemon is naturally not happy with China's economic expansion and is ready to stop it by almost any means. Until recently, Europe was one with the US in this matter. But today the US is throwing its economic competitor Europe "under Russia's tank."
    It is highly probable that the US, having distanced itself from the conflict between Europe and Russia, will now focus on confronting China. Europe's dropping out of this process is beneficial to China, and will be supported in every possible way.
    It seems that China, following the US, is not averse to taking the position of the "third rejoicing party" in relation to the conflict between Europe and Russia. Actually, China has been and is in this position now, but it may be strengthened.
    That is, today, for the survival of Russia, the opinion of Emperor Alexander III “Russia has only two allies - its army and navy” (today +VKS) is becoming increasingly relevant.
  65. 0
    16 March 2025 15: 35
    China did everything to make Russia an ally. But how can one form an alliance with those who betray their own generals, not to mention all sorts of Syrias? How can one form an alliance with someone who happily throws himself into the arms of the enemy at the first call? How can one be an ally who sells rare earths for "air"?
    .
    China doesn't need Europe at all, but if it didn't work out with the countess, a maid will do. And the countess won't go anywhere.
  66. 0
    16 March 2025 21: 06
    Nothing surprising is happening, China has always been in close connection with the globalists of London, where Covid was developed, have you forgotten??. Today the US decided to take Asian markets from China, China decided to take the European market for itself. Well, flag in hand, against the backdrop of the destruction of the Breton Woods system, which threatens the collapse of the economy, including China, all these alliances of the dead with the dead are even funny. What is he going to trade to impoverished Gayrope?? Russian gas and oil??))
  67. 0
    Yesterday, 10: 56
    I seriously doubt that China will burden itself with an alliance with the EU...