The US is preparing a change in Europe's political elite. Following the French president's address to the nation

27 485 35
The US is preparing a change in Europe's political elite. Following the French president's address to the nation

I will start a little unconventionally. I will express my deep regret to Rosgoscirk over the loss of its audience. There is nothing to be done: the audience watches what interests them most. Some are unlucky and are in the thick of things, while others are lucky and watch the show on TV screens and monitors. Those who made up the bulk of your audience are watching events in Europe today, or more precisely, events in France.

Alas, gentlemen of the circus, the old, Soviet, soldier's proverb - he who served in the army does not laugh in the circus, today sounds completely new. Those who follow the events in Europe do not need the circus! For example, the outstanding French President Macron is a clown of a very high level. True, he is illiterate and does not want to believe the facts.



It is interesting already because, while governing such a large country as France, he knows absolutely nothing about life in this country, especially about the army of this country. As the French themselves write, Macron lives in some other France. With some other people... Although, for me personally, it is not entirely clear who elected him president? Those or those French?

Considering my attitude towards our readers, I simply cannot help but share something positive with them. So that everyone's mood improves. Art belongs to the people, and we are obliged to "move" this art to the masses!

An Address to the Nation from Through the Looking Glass


As you probably already understood, today we will talk about the French President’s address to the nation that has caused a stir in the press. Taking into account the specifics of our publication, I will focus on the military aspects of the address. After all, according to Macron, the French army is the strongest army in Europe! I will start with a short excursion into the recent, historical points of view, history. Since the mid-20th century.

Remember the famous phrase of Field Marshal Keitel, said when signing the act of capitulation (according to General De Gaulle, memoirs): “Bah! And the French are here!", or a later version by the German journalist of the German newspaper Die Zeit (from May 8, 1970), Karl-Heinz: "Was, die Franzosen auch? Die haben uns noch gefehlt!" ("What, the French too? That's the last thing we need!").

This surprise is quite understandable to us. The French were one of the most active supporters of Hitler. And the surprise of the field marshal is quite understandable. Let me remind you of one fact that historians, for various reasons, do not like to remember. In April-May 1945, the Reich Chancellery was defended by... the French!

More precisely, the 33rd SS Volunteer Infantry Division "Charlemagne" (1st French) (33. Waffen-Grenadier-Division der SS "Charlemagne" (French Nr. 1). Of the 300 French, only 30 remained alive! The remaining defenders (Germans and French) of the chancellery were completely liquidated.

Now the further history of the "strongest army in Europe". Remember France's last war? It was a war, not police operations, of which there were many. Let me remind you, Vietnam! That same French colony that "practiced" on the French, and then "played" brilliantly against the Americans.

When the Vietnamese patriots from the Viet Minh movement in the colony declared the creation of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, France began a war to return the colony under its wing. You know how it all ended. While Belgian and French SS men and Wehrmacht soldiers fought for France, Paris was doing something. But soldiers eventually run out. And the reinforcements no longer had the experience of war on the Eastern Front.

And the most shameful battle of this war and, as it turned out, of all the wars of the "new" France took place. I am talking about the battle of Dien Bien Phu (from March 13 to May 7, 1954). The French army was defeated, more than 10 thousand Frenchmen surrendered. It was then that Vietnam was divided along the 17th parallel into the DRV (Hanoi) and Vietnam (Saigon).

Perhaps now someone has a question about why I do not consider the 20-year participation of the French airborne forces in Afghanistan (2001-2021) a war. Simply because the number of troops participating in this campaign can hardly speak of a war. So the French army has at least some experience in police operations in Africa, experience in intimidating blacks in Mali and chasing Bedouins in North Africa.

Although, if you don’t count the Ukrainian Armed Forces, Macron really has the right to call his army the best in Europe. Simply because other European armies don’t even have such experience. Here I agree with some Ukrainian military experts. If necessary, even the Ukrainian Armed Forces that exist today will disperse any European army “in no time”.

That is why I believe that the French president addressed the nation, the army “from behind the looking glass”, from some invented France… I talked to knowledgeable people, from whom I heard interesting information. According to the “experts”, our 1st Tank Army from the Moscow Military District, if you remove Aviation, will be more powerful than the entire French army!..

Trump has decided to "recover" Europe by letting the rotten blood out of the heads of European heads of state


For many years, the United States has been cultivating a certain type of European elite. The experiment has failed. With the exception of a couple of top European officials, we see a series of "little gray mice" who are not only incapable of making independent political decisions, but are also simply stupid, illiterate, and do not understand the essence of their work.

Accordingly, while the Americans were feeding the Europeans, while the "European barn" was not dripping, the life of Europe resembled the life of fattened calves. Do nothing but do nothing! You will still be fed, shod, clothed. Following the political elite, the Europeans themselves degraded. Instead of the ability to defend themselves, they acquired the ability to talk about defending their country! Nothing more.

And then there was a coup d'etat in Ukraine. And then the civil war began. And then the SVO. And then it turned out that the comfortable little world of Europe was just a dud. All the mistakes, all the incompetence of the leaders of European states came to light. And then you have the menacing statements of the foreign ministers of Germany, Britain, France and other "dying ones" towards Russia.

Here is the confidence that NATO can quickly "convince" Russia to "bark like everyone else" at the command of its overseas master. And what about the inexplicable urge for economic self-destruction? Don't think that there are no good economists in Europe, that Europeans cannot calculate the effects of sanctions imposed against Russia. They do calculate, but they still impose them...

The new American president sees what is happening very well. And instead of stopping the degradation of Europe, he is pushing the leaders of countries to make “fateful” decisions. Like financing the Ukrainian Armed Forces at the expense of Europe or quickly creating a European army.

This looks like such a simple and brilliant solution that the "grey mice" of Europe simply cannot help but accept it. Which is what the American president requires. The huge funds that will be allocated for purchasing equipment and weapons will mostly flow to the American military-industrial complex. Europe simply does not have the physical ability to independently arm its army in a short time.

But Trump the businessman did it, but what about Trump the president? This Trump is leading Europe to a period of change of the ruling class, to a revolution, if you like. By pushing European governments to an arms race, the American president is deliberately creating financial problems in these countries. Weapons, like the army in general, are expensive. This means that the Europeans will have to cut social programs…

Macron's address is quite indicative in this regard. If you "drain" the words of the French president, focus on the main words, you will get a very simple message. "Frenchmen, France is in danger! Russia can attack at any moment! We must sharply increase spending on the army or we will not exist. So get ready for harsh everyday life. The government will not be able to continue social programs in the near future!"

By the way, I was interested in Trump's words, spoken after Macron's speech. The words that the US in principle supports the introduction of a European army into Ukrainian territory after the end of hostilities. For the hundredth time I write about the beauty of the American president's game. Think about what will happen if this happens...

The war is not over, and suddenly a 30-strong united corps enters Ukraine, the Europeans simply cannot assemble more. Moscow has spoken many times about the legitimacy of such a goal. I recently wrote about the problem of trust. Will the Kremlin trust Europe this time? Doubtful. The corps will be destroyed! And what then, what will happen in Europe after the flow of coffins from Ukraine? Exactly what the US is trying to achieve.

The "leftists" in power will simply be swept away. The existing political elite will disappear into oblivion. Politicians loyal to the US will come to power. And unlike us, Americans are not shy about interfering in elections in the most shameless way. This, as I understand it, is Trump's plan B. I think that for people who can think, the above is enough for serious reflection about the future.

Briefly about the interim results of past events


Again, I will start with an unconventional thesis. Today, the press and the Internet are full of materials about how the actions of the American president fit well into the framework of our actions. They even say that there is some kind of plan by Putin and Trump to destroy Europe. Moreover, such conclusions are argued at the level of "most likely", "I think that this is exactly so", etc. The complete lack of logic is striking. "I said so...".

Another open secret especially for our readers. The negotiations between the USA and Russia have not yet begun! What some media outlets are presenting as negotiations today are in fact purely technical meetings. Russia and the USA are restoring diplomatic relations.

So it is not worth talking about President Trump as an ally, even a temporary one, for Russia. Once again I write that all of Trump's actions have only one goal - the return of the "greatness of the United States."

Hence the simple conclusion - to continue doing what is necessary for a complete victory over Ukraine. What is most important today is also, I think, clear. And this most important thing is now in the hands of our military. Liberation of territories where the Kiev regime is committing outrages.

Moreover, it is not worth stopping at those territories that have already de jure become part of Russia. For example, I welcome the emergence of a new, Dnepropetrovsk direction. Specifically, Dnepropetrovsk, not Dnepropetrovsk. I have long written about the need to liberate the entire Left Bank as a condition for ensuring a more or less stable border with the stump of the former Ukrainian SSR.
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    11 March 2025 04: 10
    It is not worth talking about President Trump as an ally, even a temporary one, for Russia.
    He has his own goals, which do not coincide with ours....
    1. +5
      11 March 2025 04: 36
      So it is not worth talking about President Trump as an ally, even a temporary one, of Russia. Once again I write that all of Trump's actions have only one goal - the return of the "greatness of the United States."

      And where is our great goal - the return of Russia's sovereignty and statehood?
      We weren't the ones jumping for joy when Trump won in the US... We weren't the ones offering him 2 tons of aluminum... Moreover, we weren't the ones giving the order to send 000 tons of gold to GB...
      And you are somehow trying to attach us to the activities of the Kremlin sages...
    2. +5
      11 March 2025 09: 56
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      ...... He has his own goals, which do not coincide with ours....

      So there is no need to invent anything, Vladimir Vladimirovich. hi just remember the strengthening of anti-Russian sanctions in the last term and the competition in gas sales, the efforts to oust Russia from this market. Moreover, Trump met with Putin and spoke well of him. I have no doubt that Trump's behavior will be similar now. On the other hand, he did not hesitate to withdraw from the globalist WHO, from the climate agreement and said that the US is in vain paying for membership in various. And our globalist masters tell our doctors (legislatively), so what should we expect from medicine then? And we did not withdraw from the climate agreement, but suspended it. If Trump considers the green agenda nonsense, he is talking about it. ...... Let the Russian Federation also spit on various international globalist organizations as soon as possible.
    3. +1
      11 March 2025 10: 34
      Staver's circus is in full swing... We don't know what Trump will do and how, and all this "analysis" from Staver is just an attempt at clumsy propaganda.
      1. +1
        11 March 2025 11: 03
        Quote from: dmi.pris1
        ...... We don't know what and how Trump will do, ......

        In any case, he, as a businessman and as a mafioso, will do everything that is beneficial for the United States and for himself personally, in the love ways available to him, without taking anyone into account.
    4. +3
      11 March 2025 13: 24
      Quote from Uncle Lee
      He has his own goals, which do not coincide with ours....

      It is clear that they have their own goals, but some of them still coincide with ours, of course not all.
      1. +3
        12 March 2025 05: 42
        In my opinion, we can say that the final goals do not coincide. But the intermediate ones may coincide.
  2. +5
    11 March 2025 05: 05
    Just as the enemies of the USSR proved that they captured the USSR exclusively for themselves, and to the detriment of their country and people, so Trump does everything for himself, for his show-off, and to the detriment of the USA, the Americans, and the West. And he forces the Ukrainian enemies of the USSR to capitulate not for Putin's sake, but in order to present the end of all this as his personal victory.
    1. +1
      11 March 2025 09: 15
      Quote: tatra
      so Trump does everything for himself, for his own show-off

      Not just for themselves, but for the wealthiest 1% in the US, who collectively own nearly half of the country's wealth...
    2. -1
      11 March 2025 15: 31
      Irina, can you write at least one message WITHOUT this "vragissssr-vragissssr0vragissssr"? (((
      Well, she's a grown-up, smart, educated and intelligent lady...
      and from the outside it may look like a primitive copy-paste from a "methodology" ((
  3. -4
    11 March 2025 05: 18
    A steep tangle of irreconcilable contradictions has formed in the world of capitalism and imperialism... smile
    It cannot exist forever. what
    According to all the teachings and textbooks of political economy, a world war between major states should already be raging.
    For now, we can see border skirmishes... but when will things really flare up?
    And where?
  4. +2
    11 March 2025 05: 39
    The American president's plan to drive Gayropa into the ground is very interesting, however, Trump simply won't have enough time to pull it all off in such a short four-year period
    1. +3
      11 March 2025 06: 21
      And he doesn't hide the fact that his program is designed not just for two terms, but for at least four. The Republicans are already working on candidates up until 20250! That's the level of planning...
      1. +2
        11 March 2025 07: 32
        Dear Alexander.
        I agree with you: "...all of Trump's actions have only one goal - the return of the "greatness of the United States"..."

        Well, what about Russia?
        What will happen after the end of the SVO?
        What are the plans of the All-Russian Research Institute of the Russian Federation at least until 2036?

        I read Valentin Katasonov's article "Russia's Foreign Trade Didn't Notice That the Country Has Been Warring with the West for the Fourth Year."
        Everything is sad and gloomy.

        ... It would seem that with the beginning of the SVO and the sanctions war against Russia there should be no "excess" currency. Domestic needs should be put at the forefront. Vital imports (the same microchips and machine tools) in the current harsh times should become the goal, and exports - the means.
        A means of obtaining currency to pay for imports. Not for accumulating currency in bank accounts, especially accounts of foreign banks.

        And what do we see? In 2022, 2023, and 2024, exports continued to exceed imports, and by a significant margin. In 2022, the trade surplus was $337,2 billion (the excess of exports over imports was a record high of 2,3 times!). In 2023, the surplus was $140,0 billion.

        Finally, in 2024 - $150,9 billion. In total, over three years, the total surplus of Russia's foreign trade amounted to an astronomical $628,1 billion. At the current ruble exchange rate (about 90 rubles per dollar), this is equivalent to 56,5 trillion rubles.
        Let me note that the expenditure side of the federal budget of Russia in 2024 amounted to 35 trillion rubles. The trade surplus for three years amounted to more than one and a half times the annual budget. And most of this surplus remained abroad. ...
        Overall, the picture of Russia's foreign trade for the three-year period 2022-2024 does not inspire much optimism. There are no noticeable signs of a restructuring of foreign trade, which is required by the current tense (one might say, wartime) times.

        A significant portion of exports do not work for the Russian economy; I do not rule out that the foreign exchange earnings from “excess” exports remaining abroad may even work for our enemies.

        Imports are also a weak solution to import substitution problems. I repeat once again that half of Russian imports are machinery and equipment, or in modern parlance, "investment goods". However, among them there are very few investment goods of the so-called "first instance".

        That is, machines and equipment intended for the production of other machines and equipment. Simply put, these are machine tools, forging and pressing equipment, tools. And without investment goods of the first instance, the process of industrialization (or reindustrialization) cannot be launched....
        https://svpressa.ru/economy/article/454257/?utm_source=finobzor.ru


        PS
        "...Many of us three years ago expected that in the conditions of the unfolding confrontation with the West, Russia would begin to restore order in foreign trade and make it the most important means of reindustrialization of the domestic economy. However, so far these expectations have not been met. There is marking time. And such marking time today is mortally dangerous..." (Valentin Katasonov)

        Dear Alexander.
        How would you comment on this?
        1. 0
          11 March 2025 08: 14
          Quote: AA17
          The trade surplus for three years was more than one and a half times the annual budget. And most of that surplus remained abroad.

          A considerable part of this is the consequences of trade with India in national currencies. Well, Russia earned a shitload of rupees, selling real oil at unrealistically low prices, and what to do with them? You can't export them from India, at least officially. And again, you can't convert them into real currency. You can't even buy Indian goods to export, because the Indians strictly demand currency for export. All that can be done is to organize production in India and pay for the labor force with these rupees. But the products of this production, if you get permission, can be exported. But in order to get permission, you need to give a bribe to someone, and not necessarily in rupees, because someone can demand currency. And if you don't give a bribe, then the process will not move forward, there will be a lot of songs, dances, and offers to "come back later."
          But someone reported beautifully on the de-dollarization of a considerable volume of foreign trade.
          1. +2
            11 March 2025 09: 04
            ... A significant part of this is the consequence of trade with India in national currencies


            Dear Nagan.

            I do not agree with you.
            Rupees have nothing to do with it.
            We are talking about dollars, not rupees. Rupees are a separate "song".

            There are no more than 40 billion rupees accumulated in the Russian Federation
            (The calculation of the value of 1 rupee to rubles is based on current data received from the Central Bank of Russia (CBRF) today 09.03.2025/1.02/XNUMX, and is XNUMX RUB (one ruble two kopecks).)

            ...The day before, on May 4, Reuters, citing sources, reported on Russia and India's decision to abandon trade in rupees. An unnamed Indian official told the agency that Moscow does not want more than 40 billion rupees to accumulate in its accounts... https://www.forbes.ru/finansy/488911-lavrov-zaavil-o-probleme-iz-za-vzaimorascetov-s-indiej-v-indijskih-rupiah
      2. 0
        11 March 2025 15: 35
        well yes, Elona-in-the-Maske already stated that "DJ is our next president" ))
        and yes, no joke, Vance is quite chorus-like in the format of a public politician. + without a tainted past (unlike DonFredich)...

        just one small BUT...
        voters expect real results. NOT "peacekeeping", but a reduction in the budget deficit, protection from Mexican illegals, effective (!) protectionism of American industry, etc.

        and there is a great risk that while Don is squabbling with all sorts of Zelenskys, the republics will lose half of the parliament in 1,5 years, and in less than 4 years - the presidency too...
        Let them grow a bunch of reserve candidates for at least 100 years ahead...
    2. +1
      11 March 2025 06: 29
      In Europe, even without the planned additional military spending, everything was heading towards a reduction in social welfare and a worsening economy. At first, Russia's military operations seemed like a good reason to blame everything on. Politicians happily inflated a threat they themselves did not believe in. In order to stay in power. But after the US withdrew from financial and military support, everything changed radically. It was like the person in the restaurant who was treating everyone suddenly said that he forgot his wallet. But he had to pay now.
      1. +1
        11 March 2025 12: 23
        everything was moving towards cutting social programs
        The fact is that social welfare is clearly destroying society - generations of marginals have already grown up who do not want to work, study, or serve in the army - but only demand even more social welfare and, accordingly, vote for those who promise it. And the number of such people is growing exponentially.
        deterioration of the economy.
        Oh Shlomo, yes, your Schaub stood as he dangles laughing .
  5. +4
    11 March 2025 06: 49
    an article from which pieces of reality were torn out, and the reality is that the French Legion was the most combat-ready military unit in the world until Wagner appeared. Not a word about Algeria, and the French did not fall flat on their faces there. In short, the article is in a dismissive tone towards the French, and they should not be underestimated, disrespect for the enemy has never, anywhere, led to anything good.
    1. +2
      11 March 2025 07: 14
      Not a word about Algeria either, but the French didn’t lose face there.

      I'm not good at history. Can you remind me WHO the French fought in Algeria with?
    2. +2
      11 March 2025 08: 47
      Quote from: mad-max78
      The French Legion was the most combat-ready military unit in the world

      To drive away the Papuans, who do not have a regular army, aviation, tanks - that's easy!!!
      1. 0
        11 March 2025 10: 07
        Quote: your1970
        ...... To drive the Papuans, who do not have a regular army, aviation, tanks - that's easy!!!
        laughing The Franks have a lot of experience in this! Back in the 15th century they penetrated Africa and brought all sorts of wonders. Slavery and slave trade appeared. The French succeeded in this. And then the colonies began. For 500 years they suppressed the barefoot natives, forced them to work for them.
    3. +1
      11 March 2025 10: 07
      The French Legion was the most capable military unit in the world until...

      There have been no recorded cases of legionnaires surrendering to the Japanese in WW2.
      And by no means a "division".
  6. +4
    11 March 2025 07: 25
    The "leftists" in power will simply be demolished.
    Where are the "leftists" there? For example: Norway, at present in Norway the government is formed from members of the Labor and Conservative parties. They have been in power for as long as I can remember, and who is the "leftist" there? Also France, the New Popular Front won, won the majority in parliament, and the government is formed from the right-wing minority. Where are the "leftists" there? Germany - the Social Democrats, for some reason, during their entire time in power, have not built socialism. They have not repealed discriminatory laws regarding the KKE. And at one time, IVS called them social fascists. And what kind of "leftists" are they, in Finland, ahahaha, "leftists" social democrats, pushed through the decision to join NATO. The difference between political parties in Europe is not great, some tighten the screws, others sometimes loosen them and that's it. And if your favorite right-wing conservatives, who are cooler than the "leftists" and just conservatives, come to power, Russia will not get any better from this, it will again "not be taken as an astronaut" (c), despite the fact that "we are our own bourgeois" (c) and almost right-wing conservatives, because we erect two monuments to I.A. Ilyin, monuments and on May 9 we nail up the mausoleum with plywood. They will not appreciate it. smile
    1. +2
      11 March 2025 07: 52
      ...And if your beloved right-wing conservatives, who are cooler than the "leftists" and just conservatives, come to power, Russia will not get any better from this...


      I agree with you.
      Russia will not get better because “ordinary European fascism” is looming in Europe.
      Fascism is a natural stage of developed capitalism.
      And since there is capitalism in the Russian Federation too, this future can be a reality for Russia.
      1. 0
        11 March 2025 08: 05
        may be a reality for Russia.
        And this reality is getting closer. If only because the Russian government is flirting with right-wing European conservatives. And V. Biryukov, in his articles, glorifies right-wing conservatism, to the deafening applause of many commentators, and these same commentators, to articles dedicated to May 9, write in the comments: "Thank you, Grandpa, for the victory!" Hypocrisy will destroy Russia.
    2. 0
      11 March 2025 22: 37
      Quote: parusnik
      The same in France, the New Popular Front won, gained a majority in parliament, and the government was formed from the right-wing minority.

      The National Front won there (they renamed it somehow, but it doesn't matter), and got 37%. Because of the French electoral system, which is in some places more tricky than the American one, the NNF got the most seats, the Bayrou centrists with the third place in votes got the second, and the Le Pen NF with the first place ended up in third. That's why the NNF wasn't very upset that they were given parliament, but not a government - the "reds" robbed the "dark blues" just as much as the "yellows".
  7. +1
    11 March 2025 07: 58
    Specifically, Dnepropetrovsk, not Dniprovsky.
    Ekaterinoslavsky!!! At least because the mere mention of Mother Ekaterina makes the Svidomites cringe terribly. Of course, she abolished the stronghold of Ukrainians, the Zaporizhian Sich, and tied the Cossacks to the land!!! Again, everyone knows Ekaterina the Great, but few people know Petrovsky without getting into Vika. Well, there was such a Bolshevik figure who was lucky not to fall under the steamroller of repressions, got off with just being removed from his leadership positions, but compared to the Empress, he was a nobody.
    And in general, the historical name deserves to be returned.
    1. 0
      11 March 2025 15: 37
      shhh... there are crowds of crypto-Marxists on this site, petty-minded about the USSR and EVERYTHING connected with it ))
      through the word of those spitting "capitalism, imperialism" etc.))
      they are ALSO "horribly twisted" ))
  8. -1
    11 March 2025 08: 02
    Quote: Maluck
    Not a word about Algeria either, but the French didn’t lose face there.

    I'm not good at history. Can you remind me WHO the French fought in Algeria with?

    I would call this the question of the year, I wonder who the French could have been fighting in Algeria?)))
    1. -1
      11 March 2025 15: 44
      EMNI_Vika, in 54-62 - from "armed groups advocating for Algerian independence from France";)
      before that in 1942 - with the Wehrmacht (joining the British and the Yankees)
      before that in 1830 - with Ottoman Algeria (Husmen Dey)
  9. 0
    11 March 2025 11: 19
    I haven't read such disgusting propaganda for a long time.
  10. 0
    11 March 2025 20: 33
    In short and to the point: "if you're in midstream, you don't change horses", then, if necessary (if the process of crossing is complicated enough), it is necessary to change the coachman, which Donald Fredovich is trying to do with the political elites of Europe....
  11. 0
    11 March 2025 22: 54
    The huge funds that will be allocated for purchasing equipment and weapons will mostly flow to the American military-industrial complex. Europe simply does not have the physical ability to independently arm its army in a short time.


    Here we need to look at the country that really did become the first army in Europe in a short time (an army in the sense of ground forces, and not everything else). Poland. In 2019, they adopted a very ambitious and very vague rearmament program, and, as they say, plan the impossible, do the unthinkable, and you will get something good. They already have significantly more modern NATO-standard tanks than France or Germany. Yes, three different models, but even the USSR at the peak of its power suffered from this. Artillery, both barrel and rocket, is simply much more. Air defense is comparable. They are going to drive the largest number of infantry in Europe into a trained reserve by the end of the year, not counting the Russian Federation, Ukraine and Turkey.