Special Operations Center in Kubinka

34
In the Moscow suburb of Kubinka-2, the creation of the Special Purpose Center of the Ministry of Defense of Russia began.

As expected, the center is designed for 500 special forces contract soldiers. According to the current schedule, the formation of the Special Purpose Center will be completed at the end of 2013. In Kubinka-2 there will be additional training under the special program of junior command personnel of special purpose groups of military districts and fleets. It is planned to spend about 700 million rubles for the construction of service housing for contract employees. The new center is subordinated directly to the command of the special operations forces of the Ministry of Defense of Russia. The creation of this command was announced at the beginning of March 2013. According to General of the Army Valery Gerasimov, Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Russia, the formation of the command has already been completed, it is based on the successful experience of the leading states of the world in military conflicts of the 21st century. According to a number of media reports, special operations forces in addition to special forces of the Ministry of Defense will also include special forces of the Federal Security Service, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Federal Guard Service, the Federal Penitentiary Service and the Federal Service for Drug Control. According to a newspaper source, in the military districts, the operational control of the special forces of the security services will be transferred to the command of special operations only when necessary. For special operations abroad, it is planned to attract Special Forces of the Ministry of Defense "Senezh", Airborne Forces, Special Forces Brigade of the Main Intelligence Directorate and Special Forces "Thunder". Inside the country, such operations will be conducted by internal troops, units of the Federal Penitentiary Service and the Federal Security Service.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    26 March 2013 10: 45
    Was The Berd Brigade of the GRU ......
    The Special Operations Center is both competent planning, special equipment, overseas deployment bases ... This is the training of People and their competent interaction ... and not just a camp of "militants" ...
    Modern command Ministry of Defense unable to create this .... alas ... objective reality .....
    1. +13
      26 March 2013 10: 57
      Quote: Asgard
      The modern command of the Ministry of Defense is not able to create this .... alas ... objective reality .....


      I think that you are wrong. The defeat of the forces of the Special Forces by the Serdyukovskaya gang was actually global, but this is Russia. In 1917, the Tsar’s generals said that the Soviets could not create an army, that the color of the officers was destroyed. Created and won. And now the world is not without good specialists. I am sure many will return, although the offense is certainly the strongest. But for specialists, love of the motherland is not an empty phrase. These are real people, not like the trash of Bolotnaya. There will be no turning back. Or we will be ready for everything, or we simply will not be.
      1. -1
        26 March 2013 15: 11
        I AGREE!!!!!!!!!!!!
    2. +6
      26 March 2013 11: 02
      Vladimir, let me disagree with you. I personally know many specialists who continue to serve. I am deeply convinced that we have no shortage of competent specialists who, with a certain amount of support, are able to pull off such a thing. Shoigu does not seem to be senile, and Gerasimov has not tarnished himself with anything yet. If we select the "right" people and support them, I think that the task of creating such a center will not be extraordinary. I am sure that our guys will do this job at a high level. And specialists will leave the center as worthy teachers. The main thing is not to interfere ...
    3. +2
      26 March 2013 11: 02
      Quote: Asgard
      Was The Berd Brigade of the GRU ......
      The Special Operations Center is both competent planning, special equipment, overseas deployment bases ... This is the training of People and their competent interaction ... and not just a camp of "militants" ...
      Modern command Ministry of Defense unable to create this .... alas ... objective reality .....


      Nevertheless, if you carefully read the note, you can see that we are talking about the special forces training center and this center is subordinate to command of special operations forces of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. It must be assumed that command there is planning and special equipment and interaction, and other and other. And even without a year a week to the new structure, Moscow was not immediately built.
      1. 0
        26 March 2013 13: 27
        Quote: Sharingan
        Moscow was not built in a day.

        It was necessary to make sure that the "stool" and the Makarovs did not break anything, so that now they would not build on a new one for the money of the Motherland.
        1. +2
          26 March 2013 15: 44
          Quote: cherkas.oe
          It was necessary to make sure that the "stool" and the Makarovs did not break anything, so that now they would not build on a new one for the money of the Motherland.

          But do not you think that these traitors were specially set for this.
  2. +3
    26 March 2013 10: 56
    A long-awaited competent decision, not only for enemies to unite. Kubenka has good infrastructure (training grounds, airfields, two divisions, etc.)
    The result was a powerful defense cluster. Now housing and everything will be ok.
  3. -1
    26 March 2013 11: 11
    Too many different special forces. Explicit search. And then, against what enemy is the Center created? External or internal?
    1. +6
      26 March 2013 12: 11
      Quote: erased
      And then, against what enemy is the Center created? External or internal?


      At present, we have enough external and internal enemies, so they (Special Forces detachments) all bring them to a special purpose center. In our difficult time, there are not many special forces.
  4. +1
    26 March 2013 11: 11
    + News + decision made.
    Partial unification of tactics and training will only have a positive effect - both on the level of training and on the interaction and management of all departmental special forces.
  5. dmitry46
    +2
    26 March 2013 11: 46
    But is not enough 500 contractors? Or is this just the beginning? The news is definitely good +
    1. +4
      26 March 2013 12: 16
      Quote: dmitry46
      But is not enough 500 contractors? Or is this just the beginning? The news is definitely good +


      The center of special operations is not a quick reaction force (like the Airborne Forces, for example). Their task is not military carry out operations, and specialsurgical, where you need to do everything quickly, preferably imperceptibly and very high quality. Such people are not trained by divisions. Unit training and very high costs for this training and equipment units.
    2. +3
      26 March 2013 12: 19
      If a secondary school is designed for 200 students, this does not mean that it has released 200 graduates for all the years of its existence!
  6. 0
    26 March 2013 11: 59
    Graduates of the center need to practice in Syria, so that they can "smell gunpowder" to pass hardening.
    1. 0
      26 March 2013 13: 03
      Quote: elmi
      Graduates of the center need to practice in Syria, so that they can "smell gunpowder" to pass hardening.


      In the Caucasus, you can still smell the gunpowder, that's where you need to work, and not get into other people's wars.
      1. +1
        26 March 2013 13: 18
        Well, to put it mildly, it is not comparable, judging by the news there, local sweeps take place such as besieging militants who have sat down at home, I admit there are also small skirmishes, but they are single. Now, if you compare the Chechen with 1 and 2 then I agree, the soldiers (including myself) have gained incomparable experience.
        1. 0
          26 March 2013 13: 25
          Quote: elmi
          Well, to put it mildly, it is not comparable, judging by the news there, local sweeps take place such as besieging militants who have sat down at home, I admit there are also small skirmishes, but they are single. Now, if you compare the Chechen with 1 and 2 then I agree, the soldiers (including myself) have gained incomparable experience.


          And in our country, should special forces participate in large-scale mine operations on an equal footing with infantry or something?
          The real tasks for the special forces are in the Caucasus: the release of hostages, the search and destruction, reconnaissance, the elimination of militant commanders.
          1. +2
            26 March 2013 13: 45
            I did not compare special forces with infantry, each has its own tasks. During the war, according to your special forces should work on a small scale? look for small groups of militants and destroy? Once again, every commando was once a soldier and they should have a common foundation, for an unshielded commando in the very first real battle can itself destroy others. As I think, special forces should be able to act in different directions: both in small tasks - as you have listed above, and in larger formats. You know the proverb: for one broken, they give two not broken. my principle is the same
      2. nakaz
        +2
        26 March 2013 14: 56
        The graduates of the center are uniquely identified in the Caucasus to gain experience in the destruction of gangs.
  7. -1
    26 March 2013 12: 16
    Quote: elmi
    Graduates of the center need to practice in Syria

    Do you yourself want to set an example?
    Our specialists smell gunpowder with blood!
    Or are you on the principle - my job is to crow, and there you want to get up, you want not!
    1. +2
      26 March 2013 12: 50
      Twenty five again. As much as you can juggle, it's the easiest thing to catch on a word, without arguing with your own example. I have combat experience (1 Chechen) from what I’m saying, no matter how special it’s, everything is revealed in the war, whether he is a coward or not, in a word people undergo hardening.
      Quote: VadimSt
      Our specialists smell gunpowder with blood!

      How do you know you sniffed gunpowder? were you that? What reasons do you have to say so and condemn others without understanding
      1. 0
        26 March 2013 13: 29
        Nobody caught you on the word, but no one pulled your tongue!
        It can be seen your combat experience, you personally have not taught anything.
        But I reason this way only because I know what I'm talking about!
        1. +3
          26 March 2013 13: 51
          Quote: VadimSt
          Nobody caught you on the word, but nobody pulled your tongue

          Judging by your comments, this is not the case with me.
          Quote: VadimSt
          It can be seen your combat experience, you personally have not taught anything.

          It is not for you to judge me, but the rewards and gratitude for me are more significant than your convictions
          Quote: VadimSt
          But I reason this way only because I know what I'm talking about!

          How to prove it? where did you fight? for to debate from combat experience with a man who does not have him, I see no reason
          1. 0
            26 March 2013 15: 20
            I'm not going to measure with pipettes - this is not accepted on the site!
            And I can have my point of view, after 25 years of service!
            1. +3
              26 March 2013 15: 47
              On this site to express their point of view. Everyone has their own invaluable experience.
        2. +3
          26 March 2013 13: 57
          Quote: VadimSt
          You can see your combat experience, I personally did not teach you anything. And I argue this way only because I know what I'm talking about!

          And who are you if you know whom military experience taught and who not? And what knowledge is supported by?
          1. 0
            26 March 2013 15: 21
            Thank you for not bothering to switch to you!
            1. +3
              26 March 2013 15: 55
              Decency framework has not been canceled
  8. 0
    26 March 2013 12: 49
    Twenty five again. As much as you can juggle, it's the easiest thing to catch on a word, without arguing with your own example. I have combat experience (1 Chechen) from what I’m saying, no matter how special it’s, everything is revealed in the war, whether he is a coward or not, in a word people undergo hardening.
    Quote: VadimSt
    Our specialists smell gunpowder with blood!

    How do you know you sniffed gunpowder? were you that? What reasons do you have to say so and condemn others without understanding
  9. WWW.budanov
    +3
    26 March 2013 13: 04
    Quiet, quiet gentlemen Officers, do not swear! You are NOT always in our sight, like on a parade ground! BUT, we want to continue to be proud of our GRU and Special Forces ... in a word, PATRIOTS of Russia!
    (sorry old "teacher")
  10. 0
    26 March 2013 13: 25
    The main thing is not to the next minister.
  11. +4
    26 March 2013 14: 15
    I agree with the old teacher ..... no need to swear ..... soldier

    The forces of Special Operations had to be created on September 10, 2001 ... then we were ahead of us and the twin towers were blown up by the Zionists)))
    There was a base in Lourdos, there was a Mir station that freely maneuvered in orbit, there were two combat-ready GRU brigades, landing submarines and their delivery ships ... Aircraft based on the Tu-160 for the rapid delivery of mobile groups at speeds of 2500 km .. .This is for special funds ..

    We started to teach People ....Who started teaching? People are offended !!! They drove out of the army, imprisoned (kvachkov, swag)) spread rot as they could .... and did everything on the basis of the FSB .... they did not like that the GRU collected objective information on all the leadership of Russia (including PU))) with prospects for the development of events .....
    Here are the events and begin to unfold))))

    It is no coincidence that Vovochka cancels his own decrees and decisions and restores BZHRK, Missile nuclear weapons, (he himself drank and blew up the basing mines))) EBNatik, although he was an alcoholic, but skillfully maneuvered and did not kill the Army at such a pace ..... I think "WORLD"Wait would be another solution, after all they asked the" freak "not to drown ...., they offered money, how would it come in handy .... (even with the" fungi "how was the pimply" youngsters "explained the destruction of the orbital complex)))

    Wait Zionism (or rather part of it)) sentenced completely and the role of people (sometimes one) depends on the development or death of the system, state-wah, politics ....
    It is quite possible that someone will be prepared in this camp near Kubinka (although I doubt very much, I'm ready to put a famous politician on someone's "head"))))
    And of course it is necessary to run in "fighters" in Syria, in Kuwait (an unambiguous enemy)) in Turkey (under the guise of vacationers)) in training, fighters (with flair) do not become ... trained soldiers- Yes, but these are not fighters ....

    P | S / And yet .... it’s too late to teach, we don’t have time already, we need to collect Warriors so as not to lose much ...NO TIME.
    1. +4
      26 March 2013 14: 29
      I completely agree with you, I’ll add that in no case can you agree on reductions in nuclear weapons — they want to bleed us. And judging by the intentions to revive the BZHRK, the authorities took the right direction.
      Quote: Asgard
      And of course it is necessary to run in "fighters" in Syria, in Kuwait (an unambiguous enemy)) in Turkey (under the guise of vacationers)) in training, fighters (with flair) do not become ... trained soldiers- Yes, but these are not fighters ....

      Here I agree more on this. Moreover, in our country there are so many unclaimed specialists with combat experience, and experience is disappearing. It would be possible to save money on the training of specialists by attracting experienced specialists who had gone through the war, less time was needed to complete new types of weapons.
    2. +1
      26 March 2013 15: 48
      Quote: Asgard
      | S / And .... it’s too late to teach, we don’t have time already, we need to collect the Warriors so as not to lose much ... NO TIME.

      As wisely said, you can’t imagine a better idea. Real analyst and patriot
    3. psdf
      0
      26 March 2013 18: 32
      BZHRK, Missiles, mines - this is based on the results of international agreements signed in the 90s.
      Can you give examples of such agreements from the 2000s?
      Threat MTR - so as not to get confused in our structures?
      1. -1
        26 March 2013 20: 03
        Yes please....
        Commander of the Northern Fleet Popov, after strange maneuvers of the fleet, when he ordered to withdraw the ships from the place of the Kursk wreck, since the sailors in Morse code were reporting to the "command" about the sinking of the Russian Atomic Missile carrier by a foreign submarine - advice SECURITY...... who by the way did not mind the surrender of the territory of the Murmansk region (on guard of the "aspirations" of which he should stand))) that is, the Economic Zone around Spitsbergen ...... But here the Constitution is violated ??? personally gave the Norwegians a piece of territory (the size of half of Germany))
        Recall FZ-99 which provides the entry of NATO troops into the territory of the Russian Federation with weapons, members from families and without customs inspection))))Signed by Putin in June 07, exactly after 2 months of the famous Munich speech (where he played "Vanka")))
        Оbut he didn’t itch at all with the armament of the Army before, the most combat-ready units were destroyed, He put Serdyukov(by the way and doesn’t see the bad thing that the Stool did))
        what else to remember, Iran threw with defensive complexes, Libya, defeated when it was tacitly approved (or do you think the clown iPhone showed firmness))))))))Mistrals from a friend of Sarkozy-the identity of his idea, not a single naval Admiral will ever tell you -Why do we need them ??? No tasks for them !!! He gave BP a 20% stake in ROSneft and gave them billions for an almost dead asset in TNK-fiction, only Abramovich (friend of Vovochka) received money this way)
        about the GRU and the station "PEACE"I wrote above .........
        in general, take any signed document - wrecking ......Entered the WTO(Putya signed)) and this is the surrender of national sovereignty in the economy to Western corporations .....The documents on which our entrepreneurs will sue have not yet been translated into Russian (in which he was in a hurry to sign)))
        It came to mind ... what was the need to adopt a law on volunteering, in two days, during the tragedy in Krymsk ... only one conclusion was to remove the volunteers (come at the call of the soul ))and hide true dimensions in tragedy ...

        Eh-heh-heh-heh .... people were brainwashed by the Fursen and Tel-a-Vision ......
  12. +1
    26 March 2013 17: 59
    One of the two, either in the Kubinka-2 village near Moscow, the creation of the Special Purpose Center of the Ministry of Defense of Russia began. Or in the Kubinka-2 village near Moscow the creation of the summer cottage Special Purpose Center of the Ministry of Defense of Russia began. Moreover, the second is more probable. And the more the merrier.
  13. Supervision
    +1
    26 March 2013 20: 48
    created))) already in all functions!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"