Airborne Megawatt-Class Combat Lasers: Who Will Be First – the US or Russia?

31 407 45
Airborne Megawatt-Class Combat Lasers: Who Will Be First – the US or Russia?


Difficulties with development


Laser development cycle times weapons and the lack of serial models instills pessimism in the hearts of those interested in the development of new weapons, but there is nothing surprising about this.



The fact is that laser weapons - directed energy weapons - are a fundamentally new milestone in the development of weapons. Those involved in the development and production of weapons know how long it often takes to develop and put into serial production even relatively well-established weapons models, let alone something fundamentally new.

As an example, we can cite our non-nuclear submarines of Project 677 "Lada", export modifications of which within the framework of the "Amur-1650" family were offered for export in the magazine "Military Parade" back in 1999, but we have not yet seen either the "Lada" or the "Amur" in production.

Or take the American destroyer DDG-1000 Zumwalt, the first of which was launched in 2013, but has not yet begun combat service. And we can also recall the problems with re-motoring American strategic bombers B-52H and much, much more.


We have Lada, they have Zamvolt...

However, there is progress in the development of laser weapons, for example, according to a report from the US Navy press service on February 5 of this year, during tests conducted in 2024, the HELIOS laser installation with a capacity of 150 kilowatts (kW), placed on board the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Preble, successfully hit an air target at a distance of 8 kilometers.

And laser air defense systems (Defense) DE M-SHORAD is already being used by the US Armed Forces (AF), we had previously even considered the possibility that The US may decide to conduct field tests of the DE M-SHORAD complex in the SVO zone in Ukraine.


Destroyer USS Preble and DE M-SHORAD complex

It can be assumed that the required power of combat lasers in the given weight and size characteristics has already been achieved, and the problem lies in the transition from prototypes to serial ones - in ensuring the necessary simplicity and ease of operation of such complexes not by professors and doctors of science from the developer companies, but by ordinary fighters, albeit highly qualified.

The problem is that serial models of laser weapons are only just beginning to appear, and aviation carriers do not have them at all yet. So now we are talking only about experimental samples of laser weapons, and to begin with, let's remember what kind of combat lasers can be placed on aircraft carriers?

Aircraft carriers


Aircraft carriers of laser weapons can be conditionally divided into strategic and tactical.

Strategic lasers include combat lasers placed on transport aircraft, the power of such lasers can reach several megawatts. Tactical lasers, respectively, include tactical aircraft and helicopters. The power of combat lasers considered for use on tactical carriers is tens to hundreds of kilowatts.

In general, we have already talked about the prospects of using laser weapons on combat aircraft, back in 2019, in the article "Laser Weapons: Prospects in the Air Force"Since then, no significant progress has been noticed in this direction.

As for tactical aircraft, we can expect the appearance of integrated laser self-defense systems on sixth-generation aircraft, as well as suspended container laser self-defense systems on previous-generation aircraft. Of course, the capabilities of container systems will be inferior to integrated systems, primarily due to the fact that existing aircraft and helicopters are not equipped with power take-off equipment from turbojet engines (TRD) - generators capable of providing powerful lasers with the necessary electrical energy.

[
One of the key differences between promising weapons systems is the ability to provide electricity to multiple consumers, including laser weapons.

It can be assumed that first of all Laser weapons to be installed on newest US strategic bomber B-21 RaiderAt a minimum, this machine should have the ability to install laser weapons and the ability to take power from the turbojet engine to electric generators.

It can be assumed that the power of the laser self-defense weapon on the B-21 Raider bomber will be in the region of 100-150 kW, with the prospect of increasing to 300-500 kW, which will provide this aircraft with high protection against missiles "air-to-air" and anti-aircraft guided missiles (SAM) with a range of several tens of kilometers.

Well, and finally, let's talk about specialized laser weapon systems placed on transport aircraft, which can already be conditionally classified as strategic, capable of operating at a range of hundreds of kilometers.

Megawatt class


In the US, this was the Boeing YAL-1 project, which included a Boeing 747 aircraft equipped with a chemical laser with a working fluid based on oxygen and metallic iodine. The expected power of such a laser was about one megawatt, with the potential to increase to five megawatts. The project was shut down primarily due to the complexity and danger of working with a chemical oxygen-iodine laser, as well as the high cost of the chemical components needed to produce the "shot".

In Russia, there was an experimental flying laboratory A-60 (complex 1LK222) based on the Il-76MD aircraft and the RD-0600 gas-dynamic laser weighing 760 kilograms, which was supposed to be used on the Skif combat orbital station, and which by 2011 had passed a full cycle of tests. Two AI-0600 turbojet engines weighing 24 kilograms each are used to pump the RD-600 gas-dynamic laser. The power of the RD-0600 gas-dynamic laser at the initial stage was 100 kW.


The A-60 experimental flying laboratory (left) and the Boeing YAL-1 (right)

Both chemical and gas-dynamic lasers are quite an “ancient” technology, it is believed that modern lasers powered by electric energy are more promising, for example, solid-state lasers, including their special case – fiber lasers, in the USA they are currently being developed. As for Russia, everything is more complicated here – information on the creation of our own solid-state or fiber lasers of the multi-kilowatt class in our country is practically absent, previously demonstrated complexes such as “Zadira” have not yet shown themselves anywhere, information about them has not been disseminated – there are not even reliable images of this complex.

In the material "Directed energy weapons have arrived on the battlefield" Among other things, we considered the mobile laser complex (MLC), created by specialists from the Troitsk Institute of Innovation and Thermonuclear Research (JSC RF SRC TRINITI) and designed for clearing areas of trees and shrubs in the area of ​​power transmission lines (PTL), cutting metal structures, and other similar applications.

Judging by the images, the MLC uses a 20000 kW YLS-20-CT ytterbium fiber laser produced by the American company with Russian roots IPG Photonics, so its use for military purposes is impossible.


MLK produced by JSC "SSC RF TRINITY". Image triniti.ru

There are no fewer questions about the combat laser complex (BLK) "Peresvet" - we previously considered possible options for its implementation in the material “Secrets of the Peresvet complex: how does the Russian laser sword work?”There are only three options considered - modern lasers (solid-state/fiber/liquid) powered by electrical power sources, gas-dynamic and chemical lasers, or nuclear-pumped lasers.

Based on current realities, the most likely version is that a gas-dynamic laser is installed on the Peresvet BLK - this technology was most developed in Russia, and then in the USSR. Until now, there is no reliable information about the capacity of the Peresvet BLK, in most cases the range of assumptions varies from 1 megawatt (MW) to 5 MW.

Back in the 70s, the USA tested a laser complex based on the NKC-135A flying laboratory equipped with a gas-dynamic laser, the power of which at the initial stage was 30-60 kW, and by 1978 it was increased to 400 kW. Around the same time, in 1975, the Chemical Automation Design Bureau (JSC KBKhA) created a gas-dynamic laser based on the RD-0600 laser with a total gas mixture consumption of up to 100 kilograms per second and a radiation power of up to 600 kW.


Gas-dynamic laser RD-0600. Image kbkha.ru

Considering when this development was made, it would not be too optimistic to assume that the power of the gas-dynamic laser from the Peresvet BLK is about one megawatt or more.

Aviation version of the BLK "Peresvet-A"


After the Peresvet BLK was announced, information began to periodically appear in open sources that the A-60 program would be revived, and an airborne combat laser complex (ABLC) would be created on the basis of the Peresvet BLK, and this information came from top officials in the Russian Ministry of Defense.

We previously discussed the possibility of creating such a complex and the tasks it could potentially solve in the article "Aviation version of the combat laser complex "Peresvet": carriers, targets, tactics of use".

For example, the possibility of forming a promising combat aviation group designed to create a highly stable A2AD (anti-access and area denial) zone to limit and deny access and maneuver to enemy aircraft was considered. The specified group was to include the Peresvet-A ABLC, the A-100 Premier long-range radar aircraft (AEW), two to four Su-57 multifunctional fighters, and possibly the S-70 Okhotnik UAV.


It was assumed that the Peresvet-A anti-aircraft missile system would be able to hit enemy aircraft at a distance of 250-300 kilometers, while being outside the zone of return fire from air-to-air missiles, representing the core of the group.

By the way, such a group would be very useful in the area of ​​a special military operation in Ukraine – then the enemy’s aircraft would not even come close to the combat contact line (CCL), and the enemy’s aircraft would use Storm Shadow cruise missiles at the maximum distance from the CCL, limiting the range of their use against targets on our territory.

In March 2020, PJSC Taganrog Aviation Scientific and Technical Complex named after G.M. Beriev patented the design of an aircraft carrying laser weapons, developing the concept of the A-60 laboratory.



The available images show that the laser emitter dome in the latest version of the patent is located in the front part of the aircraft, right behind the cockpit. The Il-76MD-90A transport aircraft still serves as a base; in fact, we don’t have any other options yet and don’t expect any.

The location of the laser radiation output window clearly indicates that this complex is designed to work on targets located in the upper hemisphere, that is, on enemy satellites. The laser itself is the responsibility of NPO Almaz, which has been developing a new type of laser weapon for 40 years.


It can also be assumed that work on the Peresvet-A ABLK (we don’t have another name yet) has most likely been suspended given the military operations taking place in relative proximity to the Beriev Aircraft Company.

Conclusions


The article does not answer the question: who will be the first to create a megawatt-class combat laser, serially deployed on aircraft carriers - the USA or Russia?

In fact, the US already had an experimental megawatt-class laser on an aircraft carrier, created within the framework of the Boeing YAL-1 project, while the Russian experimental flying laboratory A-60, apparently, was closer to the American flying laboratory NKC-135A. At the same time, the Boeing YAL-1 project was curtailed - the US, however, like other leading countries of the world, rejected chemical and gas-dynamic lasers in favor of modern lasers operating on electrical energy.

In the long term, this will undoubtedly give them an advantage in this area, but at present it is apparently impossible to create an offensive megawatt-class laser based on solid-state or fiber lasers. However, the US is already moving towards this value, having reached the 500 kW mark on a ground-based experimental complex. It can be assumed that a laser with a power of one megawatt or more can be created by American companies and placed on a transport aircraft as a prototype within five years and as a serial model within ten years.

It can also be assumed that in Russia, a conventional ABLC Peresvet with a gas-dynamic laser with a power of about one megawatt, with the intensification of work in this direction, can be created in approximately comparable time frames - an experimental sample in 5 years and a serial product in 10 years, with the only difference being that the technology of gas-dynamic lasers is outdated.

However, from a practical point of view, gas-dynamic lasers are quite functional and even have certain advantages over their high-tech counterparts.

Let's see where the laser weapons race takes us, we will return to this topic many times in the future, since, apparently, "star wars" are just around the corner.
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    15 February 2025 04: 51
    Why not use the Peresvet laser system in the Kursk, Belgorod, Bryansk direction? Or in the depths of the country in experimental combat use. Open sources claim that it can destroy, disable satellites at altitudes of up to 1100 km. In the horizontal direction up to 180 km. So what are we waiting for? We can try it on English reconnaissance aircraft, spotters flying point-blank near Crimea.
    1. +9
      15 February 2025 06: 51
      Quote: V.
      Why not use the Peresvet laser system?
      It's strange, but nothing has been heard about her for a long time.
      1. +3
        15 February 2025 20: 58
        Quote: Dutchman Michel
        Quote: V.
        Why not use the Peresvet laser system?
        It's strange, but nothing has been heard about her for a long time.

        There are no analogues, that's why they don't use it! And in general, it seems like it's still from Kozhugetovich's arsenal, but he left and took the keys.
    2. +10
      15 February 2025 07: 34
      Quote: V.
      Why not use the Peresvet laser system in the Kursk, Belgorod, Bryansk direction? Or in the depths of the country in experimental combat use. Open sources claim that it can destroy, disable satellites at altitudes of up to 1100 km. In the horizontal direction up to 180 km. So what are we waiting for? We can try it on English reconnaissance aircraft, spotters flying point-blank near Crimea.

      For approximately the same reason as the T-15, Kurganets, Boomerang, etc. are not used at the front.
    3. -2
      15 February 2025 13: 30
      with 100% probability there is a deal a la "we don't touch your satellites - you don't touch our satellites"
  2. +1
    15 February 2025 05: 02
    Judging by publications in the press, Ukraine is the undisputed leader in laser weapons.
    "Earlier, Sukharevsky stated that Ukraine is one of the five countries armed with laser systems capable of "shooting down planes" at an altitude of up to 2 kilometers. In addition, these laser systems are already allegedly being supplied to the troops for use by mobile groups, which will use them to shoot down Russian kamikaze drones of the Geran type."
    And here we are discussing who will have it and when request The priority of Ukrainians in the emergence of Homo erectus, rational... so, we cross that out, the creation of writing, culture (oh Lord), the digging of the seas is invincible. Now here in lasers ahead of the rest of the planet request We need to catch up, catch up!
    1. 0
      15 February 2025 05: 19
      When the ancient Ukrainians dug the Black Sea, they found drawings of the ancient Atlanteans. They built a laser according to the drawings. It all makes sense.
  3. +13
    15 February 2025 05: 18
    In the summer of 2022, Borisov said that the SVO uses the "Zadira" laser complex, and before that he said that Peresvet is almost mass-produced. There was a story that it seemed like not so long ago a case was opened against one of the developers, but this is not certain. I have a feeling that all those types of weapons that were shown to us with the arrival of Shoigu in the Ministry of Defense and until the summer of 2022 were developed somewhere in a parallel universe or only in the collective imagination - almost none of this wealth is observed even in individual copies. The VSU periodically flashes some single copies from museums like a towed 240-mm mortar, but we do not flash any derivatives with Zadira anywhere. Something new that is actively used is made by all sorts of private individuals, from lancets to robot couriers. The defense industry has only produced the UMPK and Malva, which are unlikely to compare in complexity with a megawatt laser. It is hard to say who is more to blame - the ministry or the defense industry, but in the end they are doing their job poorly in terms of creating something truly new, and it doesn't go beyond journalists.
    1. +12
      15 February 2025 05: 31
      I can't help but agree with you. I'm rereading the Warspot archive for 2017-2022. Look at all the things we haven't developed! Everything is super-duper, and drones of various shapes and sizes, and self-propelled artillery, and armored vehicles, and hand weapons, and protective gear. And as far as industrial production goes - just a couple more bolts to screw in - and you can start. And the SVO started with old Soviet equipment. Now we're churning everything out from scratch. Where is all this? request
      One thing is good, the Khkhlovs have the same story.
      1. +7
        15 February 2025 07: 34
        Quote: Chifka
        And the SVO started with old Soviet equipment. Now we are riveting everything from scratch. Where is it all?

        Maybe Gogol knows the answer?

        Abakum Dyrov, Stepan Probka, the coachman Mikhey and other deceased peasants in the work are not perceived as “dead souls”: they are shown as bright, original, talented people
        1. +2
          15 February 2025 10: 51
          Quote: Stas157
          Maybe Gogol knows the answer?
          Taking off my hat! wink laughing
      2. +1
        15 February 2025 17: 37
        And SVO started with old Soviet equipment. Now we are making everything from scratch.
        even Soviet equipment was supposed to be modernized. They offered a bunch of combat modules for the BMP. But you can't find them even with fire request
    2. +11
      15 February 2025 05: 56
      Quote from alexoff
      Borisov told.

      Borisov has told so many stories, I started tracking his oral history somewhere around 2015. He is probably a very good grandfather, he loves and can always tell something, his granddaughters probably adore him.
      1. +2
        15 February 2025 06: 06
        The United States has found no evidence that Russia used the Zadira laser system, which is capable of hitting targets at a distance of up to five kilometers, during a special military operation (SVO) to protect Donbass. This is reported by the American publication Defense News, citing a source in the Pentagon.

        Who is right, who is wrong...
  4. +5
    15 February 2025 05: 52
    with a working fluid based on oxygen and metallic iodine.
    Iodine is not a metal.
    When evaluating laser weapons, data should be provided on the beam power and the power of the laser installation itself.
    1. +5
      15 February 2025 06: 21
      Quote: Egor53
      Iodine is not a metal.

      And people didn't know. In reality, it is one of the forms of crystalline iodine. If you need it, you can easily buy it, for example:
      https://krasnodar.metalexpedition.ru/product/yod-metallicheskiy/yod-metallicheskiy-chda-gost-545-76/
  5. +2
    15 February 2025 06: 06
    And everyone forgot about electron-optical microwave lasers??? Back in 1989 such a laser was made in Ufa, they even wrote an article about it in UT. There, on a microwave emitter, it is a piece of cake to make a megawatt installation on today's nanotubes and neodymium magnets for compressing an electron beam. It is possible to obtain both an optical beam and gamma radiation using filters.
  6. -3
    15 February 2025 06: 20
    The Il-76MD-90A transport aircraft continues to serve as a base; in fact, we have no other options yet and none are expected.

    Why not use the Tu-160 as a base? Get some engineers and make a couple of carriers... The Tu has a flight time of 25 hours and 160 tons in reserve for all the tricks...
    It's so "easy" to think about and do... In addition, the plane can be armed with air-to-air missiles...
    And the goals to choose from...
  7. 0
    15 February 2025 07: 09
    What does it mean "the laser installation hit the target"? Did it explode, destroy, or just get the beams?
  8. +3
    15 February 2025 07: 33
    Quote: Yuras_Belarus
    What does it mean "the laser installation hit the target"? Did it explode, destroy, or just get the beams?

    Maybe I was just very surprised? I've never seen anything like this before. As a result, the puzzled target flew on what
  9. -3
    15 February 2025 07: 41
    Need a laser against UAVs. 100 kW is more than enough. Where to get a power source? A car battery. For example, a Tesla battery can continuously transmit 100 kW for an hour. It turns out to be a very inexpensive mobile laser.
    1. +3
      15 February 2025 08: 16
      For example, a Tesla battery can continuously transmit 100 kW for an hour. This makes for a very inexpensive mobile laser.
      They forgot about efficiency, to emit 100 kW you need to spend about 1 MW of energy. I doubt that a Tesla battery will handle it.
      1. 0
        15 February 2025 12: 48
        Quote: Ua3qhp
        They forgot about efficiency, to emit 100 kW you need to spend about 1 MW of energy. I doubt that a Tesla battery will handle it.

        Tesla sells batteries in a standard sea container form factor. 3 megawatts of capacity, 1.5 megawatts of power. For me, it's perfect. The thing is called MegaPack. We put it on a standard army truck, and we get power for the laser.
        1. +2
          15 February 2025 14: 44
          Quote: BlackMokona
          Tesla sells batteries in a standard shipping container form factor. 3 megawatts of capacity, 1.5 megawatts of power.

          The battery's energy reserve is expressed in Joules, kilojoules, megajoules... (sometimes in ampere*hours, or in watt*hours) When they start writing about megawatts of capacity, they demonstrate absolute technical incompetence. Didn't they teach you in high school what units energy is expressed in? And a capacitor the size of a finger can give 1,5 megawatts of power, but only for a very short time lol .
  10. -13
    15 February 2025 08: 41
    We are born to make fairy tales come true

    Quote: A. Mitrofanov
    ...who will be first – the USA or Russia?

    Naturally Russia.

    Why? Because we are already testing a mini nuclear reactor for lasers, installed, among other things, on airplanes. And the US is not lying around, they are waiting for the next traitor to bring them everything on a silver platter... They will not wait! All the traitors have already fled, and those who did not make it will go to jail for a long time.

    ps
    I wonder why the title of the article puts the US ahead of Russia...
    Subconscious, however.
    1. +1
      15 February 2025 14: 34
      ps
      I wonder why the title of the article puts the US ahead of Russia...

      because the US state is two hundred years old and the Russian state is thirty sad
  11. 0
    15 February 2025 09: 14
    And how does this combat laser aim at a target that is 30-40 kilometers away? Surely not with the help of radar?
    1. +1
      15 February 2025 10: 55
      Quote: Strela-10
      And how does this combat laser aim at a target that is 30-40 kilometers away? Surely not with the help of radar?
      The radar probably determines the coordinates of the target, after which the laser comes into play. I think so.
  12. +4
    15 February 2025 09: 38
    This technology was most developed in Russia, and then in the USSR.
    Probably, it was the other way around - first in the USSR.
  13. +1
    15 February 2025 10: 27
    The SDI program was closed due to its complete lack of prospects. Bill Gates spent billions and we spent no less. Now everything is repeating itself. Continuous lasers have no advantages as weapons. This was shown by famous physicists. Pulsed lasers have prospects, but the theoretical issues have not been resolved. Author, learn the math part and don't embarrass yourself.
    1. -1
      15 February 2025 21: 16
      Continuous lasers have no presumptions as weapons. This has been shown by famous physicists. Pulsed lasers have prospects, but theoretical issues have not been resolved.
      The prospects for pulsed weapons are even smaller. It is not the power of the pulse that causes damage, but the energy. Moreover, if the pulse is short, the heat capacity of the target begins to have a strong effect.
  14. +3
    15 February 2025 10: 37
    So, as a realist, I'm betting on the USA.
  15. +2
    15 February 2025 10: 55
    Dreams, fantasies, promises... fi
    I bet on the Chinese.
    because we - based on past "victories" - can make single versions for PR and parades. The first ones. And then like Peresvet - it's unclear how and what.
    Americans - will take a long time to refine it to the required condition, because there are a lot of controllers-senators from competing parties. They won't let you slip in crap.
    And the Chinese 1) are already quite developed 2) will steal simpler technologies 3) without PR will simply bring a beam of weaker lasers to one point (10-15 years ago there was a video that in China there was already a factory of the most powerful laser pointers in the world. The size of a full-fledged thick flashlight. bring together about 100 of them, and adjust the dispersion....)
  16. +1
    15 February 2025 12: 43
    It can be assumed that the power of the laser self-defense weapon on the B-21 Raider bomber will be in the region of 100-150 kW, with the prospect of increasing to 300-500 kW.
    No, you can't. See your picture with Beriev's planes.
    However, from a practical point of view, gas-dynamic lasers are quite functional and even have certain advantages over their high-tech counterparts.
    They don't have it. Plus - no need to bother with power supply from the board, the rest are minuses.
  17. 0
    15 February 2025 12: 49
    For now, the creation of combat lasers is limited by the power of energy pumping... and their efficiency at this stage is too low... but the work must continue... as soon as the problems of energy supply are solved... the topic will shine with new colors
  18. 0
    15 February 2025 14: 39
    combat lasers mounted on transport aircraft

    Just a little bit more and transport planes will become fighters wassat
  19. +1
    15 February 2025 16: 15
    AS the processes of demagnetization of the hull of ships and aircraft can be carried out in the dynamics of their movement, so can the process of accumulation of charge or creation of supervoltage in the corresponding devices to ensure the operation of laser weapons, all this lies within the framework of the theory of ionization of the surfaces of the outflow. Therefore, the devices are not so complicated if you understand the theoretical foundations of the process.
  20. 0
    15 February 2025 16: 37
    In Russia I know only one publicly known person who is able to hear what is said. It is Wasserman. As wisdom says, only a Genius can hear a genius.
  21. +1
    15 February 2025 18: 17
    Something tells me that the Chinese will be the first. In general, lately I have noticed that the West throws some of its own ideas to the masses (with the implementation of which they themselves have problems), then looks at how it is implemented and decides the world, after which it finalizes its own. That is, espionage and dedu, by the way, can also be considered as an option.
  22. 0
    15 February 2025 22: 21
    Quote: Starover_Z
    Quote: Dutchman Michel
    Quote: V.
    Why not use the Peresvet laser system?
    It's strange, but nothing has been heard about her for a long time.

    There are no analogues, that's why they don't use it! And in general, it seems like it's still from Kozhugetovich's arsenal, but he left and took the keys.


    "... and he left and took the keys..." )))
    Many people criticize Kuzhugetovich. But he was not the deputy post-country ruffian.
  23. 0
    15 February 2025 22: 28
    Couch opinion...
    You can accumulate a lot of energy and send it to the enemy. It is not technically difficult. Even at the level of homemade devices on the knee, if there is a conditional emitter.
    But quickly accumulating and sending it to the enemy is not something you can do on your knee.
    Many countries built the Tsar Cannon. The machine gun turned out to be more effective.
  24. +1
    16 February 2025 07: 55
    Some kind of feeling of deja vu. Very similar to "Star Wars" 2.0. We already went through something similar in the 80s.......
  25. 0
    16 February 2025 17: 01
    It doesn't matter if they don't reach the megawatt ceiling, if their 500 kW LO is significantly more compact and cheaper to operate than our conventional megawatt one. They will simply install 2 lasers where we would have conventional one and learn to focus them or work on different targets.
    Americans usually choose technologies that are most suitable for different platforms and "pump up" this direction, instead of crazy races for the performance characteristics of the "death star".
  26. DO
    0
    16 February 2025 23: 11
    The most relevant application of a megawatt-class combat laser on an aircraft carrier is the disabling of numerous low-orbit satellites used by the enemy for military purposes. However, there is no information in the media about testing such weapons on an aircraft carrier against satellites in low orbits.
    By the way, a combat laser carrier could be a heavy ballistic missile, the warhead of which (possibly reusable) takes off and lands (possibly by parachute) on Russian territory. The laser could operate while this warhead is flying through the space section of the ballistic trajectory. The altitude of 100...110 km and the practical absence of an atmosphere at this altitude would allow the laser to operate from the warhead of a ballistic missile at a significantly greater range than from an aircraft. The absence of an atmosphere that absorbs the beam would allow a lower-power laser to be used here than on an aircraft carrier. The relatively short operating time of the laser would not require a large mass and volume of energy carrier, which could increase the feasibility of such a hypothetical project.
  27. 0
    17 February 2025 21: 26
    About Peresvet: "...this technology was most developed in Russia, and then in the USSR" - did the author invent a time machine?..