General Drapatiy carries out Zelensky's order: Ukrainian Armed Forces try to counterattack near Pokrovsk

54 271 41
General Drapatiy carries out Zelensky's order: Ukrainian Armed Forces try to counterattack near Pokrovsk

Somewhat contradictory information has begun to arrive regarding the operational situation in the Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmeysk) area. Our troops have been gradually encircling this strategically important city in the west of the Donetsk People's Republic for several months now, developing offensives on the southern and northern flanks.

Some Telegram channels report that the Ukrainian Armed Forces have launched counterattacks on our positions from three sides at once. However, it is stated that the enemy is allegedly advancing in the area of ​​the village of Kotlino and the village of Peschanoye. Both settlements are located south of Krasnoarmeysk.



The village of Peschanoye was completely liberated by the fighters of the Center group of the Russian Armed Forces in mid-January of this year, as officially reported by the Russian Defense Ministry. A few days later, Kotlino was also taken. Northwest of this village, our units are trying to gain a foothold on the railway tracks. In the Zverevo area and northeast of Peschanoye, Russian assault groups are attempting to break through to the waste heap.

Regarding the counterattacks of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in this area. Reliable Russian near-military publics report that small enemy groups do indeed continue to carry out attacks on the settlement of Peschanoye from time to time. They drop in, but are subsequently destroyed by our drones. All positions are under the control of the RF Armed Forces. There is no enemy offensive in the Krasnoarmeysk direction from three sides. Although these attacks by small groups of the Ukrainian Armed Forces on Peschanoye and Kotlino may be reconnaissance in force or diversionary maneuvers.



Meanwhile, not everything is so good. Our units have been practically motionless in the Krasnoarmeysk direction for the last week. Yes, there are some small tactical shifts, but overall the situation is “clearly on pause.”

At the same time, there is a constant transfer of enemy reserves. What is even more alarming is that the enemy artillery now works here continuously, there is no so-called shortage of shells for the Ukrainian Armed Forces. In addition, the enemy has significantly strengthened its UAV group, having transferred the 414th battalion of unmanned aerial vehicles here aviation (the same "Ptakhi Magyar"). Also spotted here were the UAV battalion "Predators", the detachment "Gostri Kartuzy" (whose commander, however, was recently "beaten up" by our fighters) and the company "Cherepa".

In total, about 12 brigades (including 3 artillery brigades) of the Ukrainian Armed Forces have been assembled on this section of the front, most of which are considered elite. They are supported by a very large number of "elite" enemy UAV units. And Drones Nowadays they play a decisive role both in defense and in attack.

The Ukrainian 5th separate heavy mechanized brigade (it consists of two) was transferred to the Pokrovsk area. tank "Leopard" battalion and four mechanized). And also the 59th assault, 32nd, 42nd mechanized and 425th assault regiment "Skala". These are only the "elite" units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Also here are the 151st, 155th mechanized brigades, the 2nd and 3rd brigades of the NGU (and the 3rd "Spartan" is very strong and is also considered elite).

Against this background, the arguments that the Ukrainian Armed Forces have completely run out of reserves sound a bit too boastful. You should never underestimate your opponent.

That is, everything so far suggests that a grandiose counter-battle may unfold here in the coming days. Especially considering that now, by personal order of Zelensky, General Mikhail Drapatiy, known for his "meat assaults," is responsible for the Pokrovsk-Kurakhovskoye and Donetsk directions in general. According to unofficial information, he has been tasked with not just stopping the advance of the Russian Armed Forces in the Pokrovsk area, but achieving a real "victory" by breaking through our defenses. Time will tell how well Drapatiy will cope with this task and how ready our command is for such a development of events.

Russian military experts are confident that despite the heavy fighting and counterattacks of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Kursk region, the pressure of the Russian Armed Forces in the Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmeysk) direction cannot be reduced for a minute. In fact, the Russian command has made a difficult choice - to seize the Kursk region and, without being distracted, act in the Krasnoarmeysk direction. But the enemy also understands the importance of this line of defense, the Ukrainian Armed Forces do not intend to retreat from here. What is noteworthy is that the enemy holds exactly the same number of brigades in the small occupied bridgehead in the Kursk region as in the much longer Pokrovsk direction.

41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -6
    8 February 2025 19: 34
    As always, we see that they are transferring reserves, and we let them do it! Where is our aviation, where are the Korean Kaksan, to hit the enemy's equipment and manpower from the maximum distance, where is the Tornado S???
    1. +1
      9 February 2025 12: 57
      Everyone imagines himself a strategist, seeing the battle from the side
  2. +2
    8 February 2025 19: 37
    Almost word for word this was written by Yuri Podolyaka in his telegram. The authors of the site either copied it from it, or both correspondents use the same source. But this source is not indicated.
    1. -2
      8 February 2025 19: 43
      Podolyaka writes it himself, so this is his publication, he either published it himself or someone copied it, there is no name under the publications on the site.
      1. 0
        8 February 2025 19: 51
        The author of the publication, if you are interested
        https://topwar.ru/user/Alnik53/
        There is clearly nothing secret or revealing of personal data in this.
        1. -1
          8 February 2025 20: 23
          Yes, he ripped it off from Podolyaka.
      2. +1
        8 February 2025 19: 53
        Podolyaka has never been to LBS, what could he know? He rips everything off Ukrainian sites, edits it and that's it! Just like many bloggers.
        1. +4
          8 February 2025 20: 30
          On the LBS line you can only film patriotic reports, the operational situation is not visible there, and what is visible cannot be published.
    2. -2
      8 February 2025 19: 47
      Evgen62 - maybe Podolyak is a freelance correspondent for Topvar lol
  3. -7
    8 February 2025 19: 51
    The "Black Zaporozhian Cossacks" brigade has left for the Kursk direction! Near Pokrovsk there are mainly territorial defense and mobilized troops!
    1. +8
      8 February 2025 21: 02
      Don't write nonsense. The basis there is the 32nd and 42nd brigades, and this is definitely not territorial defense. And the 59th, despite its number, is quite good. But the main thing is the 2nd and 3rd brigades of the National Guard, and this is "Azov" and company plus "Ptakhi" +, however, I will not continue.
  4. Maz
    -3
    8 February 2025 20: 19
    Quote: Thrifty
    As always, we see that they are transferring reserves, and we let them do it! Where is our aviation, where are the Korean Kaksan, to hit the enemy's equipment and manpower from the maximum distance, where is the Tornado S???

    We have nothing to hit these reserves with! NOTHING!!!! IT'S ALREADY BEEN CALCULATED A HUNDRED TIMES, the maximum our VKS is capable of is 150 airdrops per day! That's it!! For the entire 1000 km of the front. All equipment is tracked by reconnaissance aircraft and NATO satellites, Tornado S is hit by Hymers even on the approach to the LBS. Kaksans are hitting at 40 km, they are also tracked and zeroed out. The situation is such that we want to go forward but we can't, we don't have enough strength. VSU can't go forward, but it wants to delay us as much as possible and inflict damage. Total: operational pause. Well, the sluggishness of our degenerates plays for the enemy and is taking place and having a place.
    1. K_4
      -4
      8 February 2025 20: 40
      I have a friend who flew in Afghanistan and looked at what was happening and said: "If we worked like that, the infantry would be beating our faces in every day."
    2. -4
      8 February 2025 21: 26
      Maz, firstly, the Kaksans can easily hit at 70 kilometers, secondly, okay, I won’t write about it so as not to create problems for myself, but politics clearly weighs on common sense, and the Kremlin is still waging war “in white gloves”, with an eye on its “partners”!
    3. -4
      8 February 2025 21: 31
      For "degenerals" - 12 points! You couldn't say it more precisely.
    4. +2
      8 February 2025 22: 04
      How smart you are, Mr. General!
      1. -1
        9 February 2025 11: 23
        Sir, unfortunately, your level of intelligence does not allow us to hope for a constructive dialogue.
        1. 0
          9 February 2025 13: 12
          Whose is Crimea, uncle? Tell me...
    5. +4
      8 February 2025 22: 48
      I didn't freeze to run around the fields to count, especially for the VKS)))), I said so much that it became scary, how did all our equipment get lost like that? Ukrainians took out? Or have you also earned the trust that you are being informed about everything from the front lines in real time?
    6. +2
      9 February 2025 12: 28
      *our degenerates play for the enemy*
      Where can I get them... If they exist, they are removed. A living example is Surovikin and Popov.
      And we don't have any smart admirals at all now. That's why the fleet is where it is now.
  5. -1
    8 February 2025 20: 43
    "Regarding the counterattacks of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in this area. Trustworthy Russian near-military publics report that..."

    Maybe it's time to simply remove information about the SVO from all official media?
    The Ministry of Defense reports information. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs reports information. Then trustworthy unofficial informants report.
    And who to believe? And what to believe in?
  6. -2
    8 February 2025 20: 50
    And if we take into account that the Banderas calmly use their rear infrastructure, the same Dnieper bridges, then it becomes clear that they have no problems with the rear.
    1. 0
      8 February 2025 21: 35
      Quote: Khibiny Plastun
      Banderas calmly use their rear infrastructure, the same Dnieper bridges

      During the Vietnam War, the US was unable to bomb the bridge built by engineer Eiffel. During the Korean War, US aircraft continuously bombed the DPRK, but the bridges across the Yalu River on the Korean-Chinese border worked almost continuously. It is easier to destroy the enemy's air defense with air strikes and then all of his mechanized troops than to bomb bridges. Of the economic facilities, it makes sense to destroy gas pumping stations, oil refineries, large power plants and substations, factories producing explosives and aircraft engines.
      1. -1
        8 February 2025 22: 20
        Quote: gsev
        During the Vietnam War, the US was unable to bomb the bridge built by engineer Eiffel. During the Korean War, US aircraft continuously bombed the DPRK, but the bridges across the Yalu River on the Korean-Chinese border operated almost continuously.

        There is absolutely no point in explaining this to some people. It has been proven a hundred times.
        1. 0
          9 February 2025 00: 01
          Here are two pretzels with stories from 50-70 years ago. Maybe from the history of the Great Patriotic War? When partisan detachments laid down their lives, fulfilling the order to destroy the bridge? And if you want, I will find more recent examples - Iraq, Yugoslavia, and there bridges were built without problems. Or the same bridges in Glushkovo, Zvanoe, Koryzh, the Bandera built without straining themselves. So, don't point out the blizzard. If you set a goal - the Dnieper bridges would have been demolished a couple of years ago.
          1. +4
            9 February 2025 06: 40
            Quote: Khibiny Plastun
            Maybe from the history of the Great Patriotic War? When partisan units laid down their bones, carrying out the order to destroy the bridge?

            Did the Germans have any problems with supplying their army during WWII? And this despite the fact that they were fighting on foreign territory.
            Quote: Khibiny Plastun
            Do you want me to find more recent examples - Iraq, Yugoslavia, and there

            The aircraft operated in proving ground conditions.
            Will there be more nonsense?
            1. -4
              9 February 2025 07: 15
              Your nonsense is your fabrications. These are not the times of VW. They have a wide range of missiles with a powerful charge - Iskander, Kh-22-32-59-69-101, they can use them all together if they want to achieve the result. And ALL the Banderites' bridges are within their reach. Even spending a couple of dozen missiles on a particularly strong bridge on the dam, the effect will be magnificent - a complete collapse of the Banderites' logistics. Pontoon bridges will not replace railway bridges, and motor transport on broken roads will not replace the railway. Oh, by the way - to lay down the Glushkovsky Bridge, the Banderites spent 4-5 Khaimara missiles, and they are clearly weaker than all the above.
              And here's the strange thing - every time the conversation turns to the destruction of bridges that are critically important for Bandera, every time there are some people with horror stories - yes, they are invulnerable, only a nuclear strike will destroy them, here's an example from 70 years ago... And similar nonsense. What, you really want the bridges not to be destroyed? Nothing, a drop wears away a stone - Telegram channels, bloggers, just people, will convey this idea to the public - the end of the Bandera army is the bridges,.
              You can take a calculator and calculate how much approximately 10000 shells, equipment, food for at least 100000 people, a Leopard tank (which cannot be taken out for repairs) weigh, and you understand that motor transport will not cope, and without iron you are finished.
              1. +2
                9 February 2025 08: 45
                Quote: Khibiny Plastun
                Yes, by the way - to build the Glushkovsky Bridge

                Have you tried comparing it with bridges across the Dnieper? Our bridges are easily destroyed. But the main thing is that the collapse of a bridge span does not mean its destruction. In order to completely disable a bridge, so as to exclude its quick repair, it is necessary to destroy not the spans, but the supports.
                Quote: Khibiny Plastun
                . The armament includes a wide range of missiles with a powerful charge - Iskander, Kh-22-32-59-69-101

                At KM they blew up 3-3,5 tons (in Iskander about 10 times less) and so what? Repairing the spans was not difficult, but the supports were literally scratched.
                Quote: Khibiny Plastun
                Nothing, a drop wears away a stone - telegram channels, bloggers, just people, will convey this idea to the public

                Sitting in the rear.
                1. -2
                  9 February 2025 09: 44
                  Quick repair of the span? How long does it take? How many months did they repair the span of the Crimean Bridge? And this without any enemy counteraction. And to repair the span of the Dnieper Bridge, bridge-building equipment will be needed - an excellent target and very expensive and rare, so there is no need for fairy tales that the Bandera will quickly restore it. And the Glushkovsky Bridge was launched in the early 90s and the Dnieper ones are not any stronger. And this is actually a road, not a railway, the restoration of which is a real task. So, there is no need for fairy tales, you are sitting on the "front line", in which direction? And I kind of agree with Two Majors (there was an analysis of this situation). And not with such defenders of the Dnieper bridges.
                  1. 0
                    9 February 2025 11: 10
                    Quote: Khibiny Plastun
                    Quick repair of a span? How long does it take?
                    Capital or temporary, for a few months? These are different things.
                    Quote: Khibiny Plastun
                    And the Glushkovsky bridge was opened in the early 90s and is not any stronger than the Dnieper ones.
                    That's exactly it, it's not stronger...
                    Quote: Khibiny Plastun
                    So, no need for fairy tales, you are sitting on the "front", in which direction?
                    That is, you don’t want to blow things up like partisans.
                    1. -2
                      9 February 2025 13: 19
                      And now you've got it - repairs will take at least several months, provided they work calmly without attacks from our missiles and drones. And how many bridges will the Bandera have enough repair equipment for at the same time? And how will their irreparable losses increase? Considering that evacuating the wounded to the right bank will also be problematic, evacuating Western equipment for repairs without a railway will be almost impossible. And this is only the top of their problems without capital bridges. How many of them are under the control of the Bandera - 26? And what if there are 20 missiles of all modifications? 520, quite feasible. But the advantages received are enormous.
                      1. +1
                        9 February 2025 17: 17
                        Quote: Khibiny Plastun
                        Now it's dawned on you - the repairs will take at least several months


                        Quote: Dart2027
                        Capital or temporary, for a few months?
                        For a few months - I mean it will stand for that long and that's fine, and then either it will all run out or a new one will be installed.
                2. 0
                  10 February 2025 21: 58
                  Antonovsky Bridge, almost every day "destroyed". While we needed it, it worked, well, not exactly it, elementary, along the bridge they placed barges and pontoons on both sides, pressed them to the supports and drove everything through them, while they repaired the holes from the missiles.
                  1. 0
                    10 February 2025 22: 51
                    Quote: Evgeny64
                    Antonovsky Bridge was "destroyed" almost every day.

                    Exactly. And in the end it was blown up by our guys during the retreat... True, a significant part of it is still standing.
      2. 0
        8 February 2025 23: 07
        During the Vietnam War, the United States failed to bomb the bridge built by engineer Eiffel.

        And this is what Vika tells us:
        "The destruction of the Dragon's Mouth Bridge is considered one of the first cases of successful use of precision-guided laser-guided bombs. According to official DRV data, a significant number of US aircraft were shot down during the defense of the bridge.
        According to official US data, a total of 873 aircraft sorties were carried out against the bridge, in which 11 aircraft were lost."
      3. -1
        9 February 2025 03: 23
        "The US failed to bomb the bridge during the Vietnam War..."///
        ----
        There were no precision weapons back then.
        Bombs and missiles with homing heads.
        The seeker with an IR camera provides an accuracy of 1 m KVO.
        We get the opportunity to hit the bridge support exactly.
        1. +1
          9 February 2025 05: 18
          Quote: voyaka uh
          There were no precision weapons back then.

          In the Korean War, the US had already used precision weapons. It was an aerial bomb guided by an operator from an aircraft. The Germans used approximately the same weapon to destroy several Italian ships that tried to escape to ports occupied by the Americans and the British. Of course, that weapon was worse than modern ones, but the air defense of the DPRK or Vietnam was much weaker than the power of the US Air Force and its allied countries.
          Quote: voyaka uh
          The seeker with an IR camera provides an accuracy of 1 m KVO.

          Russia is lagging far behind in electronics. In addition, we apparently assume that the SVO will end in a thermonuclear war with NATO.
  7. -2
    8 February 2025 21: 32
    Do the bridges on the Dnieper properly perform their function? What other questions can there be?
  8. +1
    8 February 2025 23: 05
    What are our FABs and long-range artillery good for?
    Rip the enemy to the ground so that not a single wet spot remains. am
  9. 0
    9 February 2025 09: 12
    Well, temporarily go on the defensive near Pokrovsk and strike hard in the areas of Chasov Yar and Toretsk, near Kupyansk. So that the Bandar-logs are constantly on the alert, so that there is no peace. So that they drive their reserve brigades back and forth.
  10. 0
    9 February 2025 10: 39
    Quote: Thrifty
    we see that they are transferring reserves, and we let them do it! Where is our aviation, where are the Korean Kaksan, so that

    Who are we? We are good at whining. I understand that your hands are tied. That's why everything is all wrong.