Units of the North group of troops have cleared Cherkasskaya Konopelka and Fanaseyevka, fighting is ongoing in the adjacent forest belts

Units of the North group of forces continue to take action to defeat the Ukrainian Armed Forces formations in the Kursk region, with the main focus being on the Cherkasskaya Konopelka and Fanaseyevka area southeast of Sudzha, where the Ukrainian Armed Forces attempted to counterattack.

According to the Defense Ministry's report, the enemy is still holding 12 brigades in the Kursk direction, and combat operations are taking place in the areas of eleven settlements. There is no new information from the military about the breakthrough attempt, the main information comes from Russian monitoring resources. According to them, Cherkasskaya Konopelka has been cleared, as has Fanaseyevka, and in the afternoon, Russian Armed Forces units are clearing forest areas south of these two settlements. The fighting continues, there are many abandoned Ukrainian "three-hundredths" in the forest belts, some did not wait for help and went over to the "two-hundredths".

Fierce fighting is taking place north of the two villages in the area of ​​the Lotos gas station, with both sides using the full range of weapons. It is also reported that our troops have pulled very strong drone teams to this area, which are literally mowing down the enemy's equipment. The Ukrainian Armed Forces' attempts to transfer reserves are being thwarted, the number of Ukrainian armored vehicles destroyed on the roads is growing, as are the corpses of Ukrainian soldiers. But nothing has ended yet.

According to Ukrainian resources, as a result of the new counterattack on Cherkasskaya Konopelka and Fanaseyevka, the Ukrainian Armed Forces lost about a hundred units of equipment, there is no information yet on personnel, but that is also a lot. Now Syrsky is forced to transfer reserves directly from the Sumy region to support the offensive. In case of failure, this will be the biggest setback for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

Comments

[RuAbel]

Well, the new minister said, you can't lie! Well, dear comrades Mazuriki, how can you clean up villages that, according to your own reports, were not captured?!?!

[Leshak]

Indeed, the wording: "... Cherkasskaya Konopelka has been cleared, as has Fanaseyevka..." Makes you wonder - why was it necessary to tell a lie and then look like... Well, in general, it's clear to everyone.

[Comrade Beria]

"Captured" and "attempted capture", in which the enemy breaks through to the territory of the NP, are two very different things. Capturing the outskirts is not the same as capturing the entire NP. However, ours are guilty of this too. And yours?

[nik-mazur]

Quote from Ruabel

How can you clear out villages that, according to your own reports, were not captured?

If a populated area ended up in a “gray zone” during the fighting, then it needs to be cleared out, right?

[RuAbel]

So he wasn't in the gray one, he wasn't listed. According to yesterday's reports, the Ukrainian bypassed it. But there are a lot of inconsistencies there...

[nik-mazur]

Quote from Ruabel

So he wasn't in gray, he wasn't listed

Do they report this?

[RuAbel]

Not just to everyone)))
Information is leaking out, you just have to see it.

[nik-mazur]

Quote from Ruabel

you just have to see it

Oh, this elitism that allows one to see and think things that are not available to mere mortals.

[RuAbel]

Oh, this proletarian sackcloth that covers up any incompetence*)))
*incompetence — inexperience, ignorance, illiteracy, illiteracy, illiteracy; uninitiated, ignorant, ignorant, uninformed, unfamiliar, ignorant, uninformed

[nik-mazur]

Quote from Ruabel

a proletarian rag that covers up any incompetence

Fancy. I'm embarrassed to ask, but did you understand what you wrote? Can you rephrase it from elitist (and presumably competent) into generally understandable worker-peasant language (and no, I don't mean obscene, as you immediately thought)?

[RuAbel]

Of course I can. I have a good command of the great and mighty.

[nik-mazur]

Quote from Ruabel

I am proficient in the great and mighty

Did I ask about this?

[RuAbel]

Well, maybe you understand memes?

[nik-mazur]

Quote from Ruabel

maybe you understand memes

Let's use words instead.

[RuAbel]

Let me just apologize and let's finish this, okay?
Sorry, brother, if I accidentally offended you! We are all worried, on edge, I didn't mean to. For Victory, up 100g!

[nik-mazur]

Quote from Ruabel

I'd better apologize and let's finish... For Victory, up 100g!

It is impossible to either object or refuse.

[NakedMan]

The grey zone is when there are neither ours nor the enemy. But in populated areas it is often the other way around, there are both on the neighbouring streets.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Naked Man

The gray zone is when there are neither ours nor the enemy

Rather, when no one has secured a foothold. And whether there is a patchwork or no one there - this needs to be checked in any case.

[Alien ...]

Moreover: "... Cherkasskaya Konopelka has been cleared, as has Fanaseyevka; in the afternoon, units of the Russian Armed Forces are clearing forest areas south of these two settlements" There and then Ukrainians How did you end up?

[griboedov09]

Yes, I also think that this is nonsense and not an article, here is what they write on the military chronicle for 8.02.2025/23/00 at XNUMX:XNUMX Moscow time

"Current LBS in Kursk region. Cherkasskaya Konopelka is under the enemy, Fanaseyevka is also under it - there and nearby in the forest there are up to 70 infantry of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. To the east of Kolmaki and further to the highway in the area of ​​the agro-complex there are up to 26 enemy infantry. Ours are pressing the enemy and not allowing him to advance further to Ulanki."

[Azzzwer]

We wanted the best, but it turned out as usual

[bk316]

Well, dear fellow mazuriki,

And who are the Mazuriki?
Who are you talking to?
And in general, what language is this in, Muva or Belarusian?

[Lemon]

Another counter-grunt failed again. Technicians and naro lost plenty.

[kventinasd]

Our forces have pulled very strong drone teams into this area, which are literally mowing down the enemy’s equipment.

Good hunting to our guys!

[Irek]

They are reassuring the Khokhlots that this is supposedly a special operation to lure the Russian Armed Forces.

[asher]

"There is no new information about the attempt to break through from the military" - that's right, they've shit themselves and now it's better to keep quiet!

[Fitter65]

Quote: asher

that's right, they've shit themselves badly and now it's better to keep quiet!

Why liquid? Very powerful - purely Ukrainian...

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Fitter65

powerful - purely in Ukrainian

Out of fierce hatred, without taking off his trousers.

[Fitter65]

Quote from: nik-mazur

Out of fierce hatred, without taking off his trousers.

Polish cattle are very fierce, they have no time to take off their trousers...

[kventinasd]

They've definitely screwed up.
Mountains of corpses of Ukrainian militants during an attempt to break through Russian positions in the Kursk region.

[Comrade Beria]

Quote: kventinasd

Mountains of corpses of Ukrainian militants during an attempt to break through Russian positions in the Kursk region.

Let's take a better look here, otherwise not only everyone might see you.

[Olesya Lesya]

Our guys did a great job. Great video, even though I'm not bloodthirsty, it's nice to see piglets in sacks.

[Fitter65]

The fighting continues, there are many abandoned Ukrainian "three-hundredths" in the forest belts, some did not wait for help and switched to "two-hundredths".

It's a pity that not all of them, otherwise they'll start getting treatment with our taxes...

[alexoff]

The news from Kursk Oblast looks more like a couple of battalions butting heads for a village of three streets and an adjacent field. In other areas, they have apparently gone into passive defense.

[ergh081]

From the news in Kursk region it is clear that the enemy is losing about a battalion (plus or minus) per day. So, in any case, the talk is about "butting" brigades, if this hard soldier's work can be called that.

[storm]

Units of the North group of forces continue to take action to defeat the Ukrainian Armed Forces formations in the Kursk region

According to the Ministry of Defense report, the enemy still holds formations of 12 brigades in the Kursk direction....

According to the Ministry of Defense, the enemy has been destroyed by all means for six months, and there are only 12 brigades of them, and they are constantly advancing in various directions....
It's just some kind of mystery...

[RuAbel]

There is a trick here - not 12 brigades, but units pulled from 12 brigades, but it sounds great.

[storm]

So what is the problem with driving out these units “pulled together” from 12 brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces?
Why did they capture and hold such a territory of the Kursk region in 6 days that our heroic troops under the wise command of the General Staff have not been able to liberate for 6 months?

[Alien ...]

I can't because there's no one...
By the way, VO replaces the word kho-khol with the word Ukrainian. I wonder if "Banderovets" is also taboo here? Cool...

[alexoff]

I can't because there's no one...

It seems like our country is bigger, plus or minus parity in the number of fighters, but there is no one to fight. But there are two thousand generals, 13 trillion stolen for the state defense order and one and a half million sets of uniforms, and also all sorts of parade Taman divisions that are not seen at the front.

[Metallurg_2]

And you write like this: xoxол.

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Alien ...

I can't because there's no one...

I have been thinking and talking about this for a long time. There are clearly not enough troops. Those who sign the contract are only going to replenish the losses. I would very much like to be wrong. But the increase in payments upon signing the contract indicates that there are not enough volunteers. We must wait for mobilization.

[Alien ...]

For the word mobilization - execution/breaking on the wheel/Spanish boot... The Supreme Commander already got into trouble once with a promise not to carry it out. Someone pulled his tongue a second time... That's why they shut him up with contract soldiers as best they can. And with conscripts (remember how many of them were captured by the Ukrainians in Kursk). But there is also a plus: payments are growing quickly and noticeably.

[Thompson]

Take the machine gun and go ahead! There's no need to start a queue with the keys here.

[1976AG]

"According to the Ministry of Defense, the enemy has been destroyed by all means for six months, and there are only 12 brigades of them, and they are constantly advancing in various directions....
It's just some kind of mystery...."

I don't know why this is a mystery to you. Everyone knows that the Ukrainian Armed Forces units in Kursk Oblast are constantly receiving reinforcements.

[storm]

The mystery is not that the Ukrainian Armed Forces are receiving reinforcements, but why the Russian Armed Forces, in 6 months, despite having a complete advantage in aviation, artillery and the OTRK, have still not managed to block TWO roads through which the Ukrainian Armed Forces are supplied with ammunition, equipment and fresh reinforcements...

[1976AG]

In order to close the roads, they need to be physically cut off. Until that happens, some equipment will still get there.

[storm]

Have you heard about the FAB-3000 and FAB-1500 with UMPK, which successfully destroy bridges, overpasses, and crossings?
It is enough to drop one bomb once a week, preferably at a time when columns of the Ukrainian Armed Forces are moving there....

[1976AG]

You will probably be surprised. But I have also heard about FABs. And have you heard that before dropping them on columns or small groups of equipment (large columns are rare now) you first need to detect these columns? Of course, you can destroy bridges and they are destroyed, but you probably haven't heard that there are pontoons. Of course, they are also destroyed from time to time, but they are also aimed quite quickly. So the only effective method is the physical destruction of moving equipment, and it must first be detected. And for this, drones must always keep the routes under control. And at a great distance from these routes, this is very difficult to do.

[storm]

do we need to find these very columns first?

What do our UAV operators do if not reconnaissance, especially along the enemy's main supply routes?
I'm not even talking about satellite and aerial reconnaissance, which must supply the General Staff with intelligence data in ON LINE mode 24 hours a day.

In addition, in addition to the OFAB with UMPK, the valiant Russian army has the Iskander OTRK and TORNADO-S MLRS, designed to strike enemy groups and strategic targets.
And if we consider that the entire occupied territory of the Kursk region of 1200 square kilometers is a plot of land 30*40 km, any area can be covered with both the URAGAN MLRS and artillery, if there is a desire...

[1976AG]

"What do our UAV operators do if not reconnaissance, especially along the enemy's main supply routes?"

I already told you that ", and first it needs to be detected. And for this it is necessary that the drones always keep the routes under control. And at a great distance from these routes it is very difficult to do." I will probably surprise you again. But the enemy does not sit idly by either, but fights our drones in all available ways and we do not always succeed in keeping all supply routes under round-the-clock control. Moreover, this is far from the only task for drone operators, there are many targets there and everything must be identified and destroyed.

"I'm not even talking about satellite and aerial reconnaissance, which must supply the General Staff with intelligence data in ON LINE mode 24 hours a day."

And it is right that you do not say, because their task is to carry out reconnaissance not only in the Kursk region, but also at least in all NATO countries plus the Far East. Although you apparently believe that we have unlimited resources in the field of reconnaissance, but unfortunately this is not so.

"If there was a will..."

Yes, I already understood that only you have the desire to destroy the enemy.

[storm]

and at a great distance from these routes it is very difficult to do this"

The distance from the positions of Russian troops to the roads along which supplies to the Ukrainian Armed Forces have been carried out for 6 months is only 15-20 km.
In your opinion (and most likely in the opinion of the General Staff of the Russian Federation), during the SVO, satellites should mainly observe Siberia and the Far East, and not the combat zone in the Kursk region, which is why pilots, artillerymen and missilemen do not have intelligence data....
In the end, observers could be placed in the bushes by the road, who would monitor the road around the clock and, if an enemy appears, inform the command, who would order the launch of a UAV and receive data about it.
enemy advancement.....
Or this method of obtaining data about the enemy does not fit into the heads
Generals and colonels of the General Staff...?

[1976AG]

"In your opinion (and most likely in the opinion of the General Staff of the Russian Federation), during the SVO, satellites should mainly observe Siberia and the Far East, and not the combat zone in the Kursk region"
You read my answers very inattentively, that's why you draw the stupidest conclusions! But I'll explain, the tasks of space intelligence include monitoring, among other things, Ukraine and all NATO countries (and there's a lot of things there that need to be monitored), and in the Far East there's Japan and South Korea, including American military bases. All of this also needs to be monitored. And I'll remind you once again, our capabilities in the field of intelligence are not unlimited.
"In your opinion (most likely, in the opinion of the General Staff of the Russian Federation), during the SVO, satellites should mainly observe Siberia and the Far East,"
This is not my opinion, but your misunderstanding.
"In the end, it would be possible to place observers in the bushes by the road who would monitor the road around the clock and, if the enemy appeared, inform the command, who would order the UAV to be launched and receive data about
the enemy's advance."
So we'll drop you 15 km behind enemy lines into the bushes by the road, you'll sit there and report. Don't you want to?

[storm]

So we'll drop you off 15 km away.

Your thrower hasn't grown up yet!
You are simply ridiculous in your stupid attempts to justify the idiotic situation when part of the territory of Russia has been under occupation for half a year already, together with several thousand citizens of the Russian Federation, abandoned
there by official authorities...

[1976AG]

"Your throwing ability hasn't grown yet!"

What grew in me and what didn't, you don't know, so keep your dirty thoughts to yourself. But I understood that for some reason you have no desire to sit in the bushes by the road alone behind enemy lines. And you suggest throwing others there and let them survive as they wish.

"You are simply ridiculous in your stupid attempts to justify an idiotic situation.."

I am telling you what is, and the fact that you are not satisfied with this explanation is your problem and your opinion does not change reality.

[storm]

And you suggest throwing others there and letting them survive as they wish.

But those who live their entire lives at the expense of the state, receive salaries, apartments, pensions from all sorts of security agencies, let them sit in the bushes if they do not know how to conduct reconnaissance in other ways and, based on the intelligence received, strike at the enemy.
There are 5 million security forces in Russia, these professionals have the "cards in their hands", and I am already too old for these exploits.....

[alexoff]

Of course, bridges can be destroyed and they are destroyed.

in the Sumy region, where there are many rivers and bridges, according to the news, our guys attacked one bridge in six months. Apparently, they don't really want to. Let's not interfere with the enemy

[1976AG]

Quote from alexoff

Of course, bridges can be destroyed and they are destroyed.

in the Sumy region, where there are many rivers and bridges, according to the news, our guys attacked one bridge in six months. Apparently, they don't really want to. Let's not interfere with the enemy

Apparently you also don't know anything about the existence of pontoons. Yes, destroying railway bridges is effective, but automobile bridges are so-so...

[alexoff]

Apparently you also don’t know anything about the existence of pontoons.

and there is an infinite number of pontoons, they can be erected in five minutes and their throughput capacity is the same as that of bridges.

Destroying railway bridges is effective, yes, but automobile bridges are so-so...

and because? That's right, don't even try! If you put a couple of FABs in the trench, the front will collapse right away, because there were three irreplaceable Tarases there, but on the bridge - it's useless, the people won't understand, we won't even try, and whoever reminds comrade general will receive a severe reprimand!

[1976AG]

"And because? That's right, don't even try!"
And that's why there are simply more important goals. The front won't collapse because of three Taras, of course, but we'll definitely save the lives of several of our fighters. Although what do you care about that, pretty pictures are more important to you...

[alexoff]

In the North-Eastern Military District, someone decided to try alternative methods of warfare. For thousands of years, cutting off the enemy army's supplies was the key to victory, but this is an archaic approach, we are only for frontal attacks. Similarly, you can't hit enemy headquarters, there are no losses among Ukrainian generals. They don't shoot, do they? But three Mykolas do! And you can also supply diesel fuel from Lukoil refineries to the bastards, allowing Alekperov to write out dividends for himself worth hundreds of billions of rubles. There are still some particularly protective people here who say that it is right to store reserves abroad, but we simply do not understand the cunning plans. Which for some reason do not work, but we will not abandon them!

[nik-mazur]

Quote from alexoff

For thousands of years, cutting off an enemy army's supply lines was the key to victory.

Would you mind pampering me with some proof? Or a historical example?

[alexoff]

I will spoil you only after you give an example of successful operations of the Russian General Staff or the SVR.

[nik-mazur]

Quote from alexoff

I will pamper you only after

I had no doubt that there were no examples and there never would be.

[alexoff]

I had no doubt at all that you knew nothing and would pretend to be a know-it-all who knows nothing.
Look, people used to cut off supplies to armies, driving them into cities or fortresses. It was called a siege! Don't you know that word? What are you doing at a military review?
Now let me guess - you don't know any examples of operations? Come on, I demand you ignore my questions!

[nik-mazur]

Quote from alexoff

People used to cut off supplies to armies, driving them into cities or fortresses. It was called a siege!

And these sieges could last for years. At the same time, for every example of a successful siege, you can find an example of an unsuccessful one. In addition, there are a huge number of examples when, instead of a siege, an assault was used ̶v̶ ̶for̶e̶b̶.
And in field battles, cutting off logistics was not practiced at all.

[alexoff]

And these sieges could last for years.

and now armies need more and sieges end much faster

At the same time, for every example of a successful siege, you can find an example of an unsuccessful one. In addition, there are a huge number of examples when, instead of a siege, an assault was used ̶v̶ ̶for̶e̶b̶.

What's the stats? Has a frontal assault often been more successful than a siege?

And in field battles, cutting off logistics was not practiced at all.

yeah, they just attacked the convoy, causing problems for the enemy

I will probably not get any examples of General Staff operations from either you or the General Staff. I am not surprised.

[nik-mazur]

Quote from alexoff

what are the statistics?

The same as with your statistics of sieges being more successful than assaults.

Quote from alexoff

I guess I won't see examples of General Staff operations

Crimea in 2014. Land corridor to Crimea in 2022. More than successful operations.
But you will stretch the owl of reality on the propaganda globe to show the opposite. Therefore, it is useless to argue with you (not personally, but in a broad sense with the Soviet Navalny supporters), one can only have fun when the mood strikes. But for now, you are boring. Wait for next time.

[alexoff]

The same as with your statistics of sieges being more successful than assaults.

where are the statistics? Will there be links? Or is this like another reduction to Navalny, and therefore nothing can be proven?

Crimea in 2014.

SVO started in 2014?

Land corridor to Crimea in 2022.

The troops reached Mariupol from Crimea without fighting. A cool operation to drive through empty cities. And a frontal assault on Volnovakha by the army corps, after which the named battalions disappeared from the news. An operation, apparently. Is there anything else? After March 2022?

Therefore, it is useless to argue with you (not personally, but in a broad sense with the Soviet Navalny supporters)

Of course - how can you argue if there are no facts? You have to invent Stalinists-Navalnyists and pretend to be a dead Greek

[storm]

in field battles, cutting off logistics was not practiced at all.

In field conditions, cutting off logistics is called ENVIRONMENT or, in common parlance, a Cauldron.
How many cauldrons were created by the Nazis in 41 and 42, how many cauldrons were created by the Soviet troops, read in the history of the Great Patriotic War...
How many prisoners, military equipment and other trophies were captured in these CAULDRONS is indicated in historical documents, the Internet will help you...

[nik-mazur]

Quote: assault

How many cauldrons did the fascists create in 41 and 42, how many cauldrons did the Soviet troops create?

As a courtesy to you, I can recommend reading how many successful operations were carried out without encirclements and how many boilers were not created or turned out to be unsuccessful.
Perhaps the most striking example is the Battle of Kursk. The Germans carried out an encirclement operation and suffered a crushing defeat. And ours routed the Germans without encirclement.

[1976AG]

But the fact that the headquarters and the highest military and political leadership of the enemy are not destroyed is truly a crime against our people.

[griboedov09]

Ukhokhla trains 50k people in Europe every two months, plus they train them at home and send them to the front without training

[Comrade Beria]

A couple of videos from there.

https://ok.ru/video/8915583830656 - разгром укротехники на Курском направлении, подборка видео за полтора суток. Раньше радовало "Нижняя подсветка включена", теперь "NO IMAGE".

https://ok.ru/video/8915584420480 - Операторы 810-й бригады добивают десанты врага в Фанасеевке и Черкасской Конопельке сбросами.

[RuAbel]

Quote: Comrade Beria

And your?

My heart sank, you're just like Lavrenty Palych))))

[Comrade Beria]

I can't buy round glasses, or a hat. But as they say, there is some similarity.

[Olesya Lesya]

He was just really upset that their counter-hook failed. Don't pay attention.

[Huarabey]

Whenever there is good news from the Kursk region, it becomes "no big deal", and when there is bad news, a bunch of mummers immediately flock to inflate the "universal catastrophe".

[navigator777]

Great news, it simply couldn't be any other way, Zeli needs victories, but they will never happen again.

[sir Garry]

Quote: assault

expel these units "pulled together" from 12 brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces?

That's the problem, they don't need to be driven out or "squeezed out", but DESTROYED completely!!!