Asia Times: US Air Force Developing Low-Cost Cruise Missile Dubbed Drone Killer

12 581 13
Asia Times: US Air Force Developing Low-Cost Cruise Missile Dubbed Drone Killer

US Air Force Develops Low-Cost Winged Vehicle rocket, known as the Extended Range Strike Munition (ERAM), which can be converted into a destroyer drones, but whether it will become one is still unclear, writes the Asia Times.

According to the authors of the publication, the ERAM program was launched, among other things, to meet the needs of the Ukrainian military. The project is managed by the Armament Directorate of the U.S. Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, based at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida.



The ERAM project, currently in the early stages of development, aims to create a precision-guided munition with a range of up to 400 kilometers and the ability to operate in challenging conditions using GPS.

The US Air Force’s focus on more affordable air-to-air capabilities is driven by the need to counter drones and subsonic cruise missiles in the era of modern warfare. The war in Ukraine and the operation against Yemen’s Houthis have demonstrated the critical need for cheap, mass-produced interceptors to combat drones and missile attacks, Asia Times notes.

The ERAM project will provide more cost-effective means to combat drones and slow-moving aerial targets like the balloon shot down over US territory in 2023 (Washington claimed that the balloon was a Chinese spy). In addition, unlike more expensive air-to-air missiles like the AIM-9X and AIM-120 with a range of up to 55 kilometers, ERAM, as already mentioned, has a range of 400 km. How realistic this figure is will only be known when the missile is ready and tested.

Because ERAM can be modified to engage air, sea, and land targets, the U.S. will likely be able to engage multiple targets with a single munition, simplifying production and logistics while reducing the need for multiple specialized types. weapons.

The high cost and long production times of some U.S. missiles, such as the Tomahawk Block V and Patriot PAC-3, raise questions about the ability of the U.S. defense industrial base to meet the huge demand for precision-guided munitions in modern warfare, said Seth Jones, an analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

In this regard, the ERAM missile could be an important addition to other weapons the US needs to be prepared to effectively conduct combat operations in modern conditions. However, skeptics believe that it may be too slow to penetrate modern systems. Defense, and is not maneuverable enough to hit maneuvering targets.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    4 February 2025 20: 27
    The U.S. Air Force is developing a low-cost cruise missile known as the Extended Range Strike Munition (ERAM) that could be turned into a drone killer.

    Why do we need cruise missiles = destroyers of "drones" if there are missiles that can destroy the country that is going to launch these destroyers... As they say, we must fight the root cause, not the effect... am
    1. -1
      5 February 2025 05: 43
      The main problem with drones is detecting them in time.
      If the operator is skilled, the drone flies low.
      It can only be detected close by, and at the last moment.
      Therefore, the emphasis should be on detection, automatic response, and short-range destruction capabilities.
      Even in the times of the USSR, with poorly developed electronics, they were able to make a means of detecting an incoming rocket from a grenade launcher and an automatic counter-shot on a tank.
      So, you can do the same with drones on a tank or a ship.
      As an air defense against drones, swarms of drones should be used to cover buildings.
      A cruise missile is an effective long-range attack weapon, not a defensive weapon.
      1. 0
        5 February 2025 15: 37
        Why do we need cruise missiles = destroyers of "drones"
        Maybe it is not an interceptor missile that is meant, but a missile that is produced in such a large series that it will become a successful competitor to the drone. Because of which the use of drones will decline. I can't imagine another option.
  2. fiv
    +2
    4 February 2025 20: 42
    Inexpensive cruise missiles with a sensitive seeker, a decent engine, capable of active maneuvering, and being guided by external target designation. What nonsense.
  3. -3
    4 February 2025 21: 12
    We should buy some of these missiles from the Americans...

    There are more and more reports from the front the appearance of enemy drones that do not react to the Bulat and Asel drone detectors. The enemy is not only switching to non-standard video frequencies: 3,3 GHz, 2,7 GHz, 6,2 GHz, but is also actively starting to use fiber-optic drones, which give away their presence only by sound and nothing else.

    The situation at the front is becoming seriously complicated, since with the advent of optical drones, conventional drones on standard frequencies will not go anywhere.
    There is little or weak EW in the area - swarms of regular FPV will fly. It is difficult to break through - FPV on optics will fly.

    https://voenhronika.ru/publ/vojna_na_ukraine/04_02_2025_ostraja_nekhvatka_pekhoty_u_vsu_20_tyla_budut_otpravleny_v_shturmovki_poslednie_video_iz_zony_svo_i_novosti_s_ukrainy_13_video/60-1-0-16109
    1. BAI
      +1
      4 February 2025 21: 15
      Drone can't react to drone detector. It's the detectors that react to drone
      1. 0
        4 February 2025 21: 31
        Quote: BAI
        Drone cannot respond to drone detector

        Be more lenient - this is a war chronicle. They have some kind of crazy stuff going on there all the time.
      2. -3
        4 February 2025 22: 00
        I'll correct the author: "about the appearance of enemy drones to which drone detectors do not react." The person is not writing from the couch, he can put a particle in the wrong place in the rush, for an erudite reader this should not become an obstacle to understanding the essence.
        1. 0
          6 February 2025 07: 51
          Judging by the number of downvotes, the erudite are in the minority here, while the offended are more numerous. bully
  4. +1
    4 February 2025 21: 24
    However, skeptics believe that it may be too slow to penetrate modern air defense systems and not maneuverable enough to hit maneuvering targets.
    maybe they will do something...
    As for the air defense that this wonder weapon should penetrate... at least it is also developing, becoming denser, more effective. Just give us time!
  5. 0
    4 February 2025 21: 26
    If such a drag continues without destroying the logistics of supplying VSU, without eliminating the top brass of Bandera, then I will not be surprised to see such missiles tested in some time at the "404" testing ground.
  6. 0
    5 February 2025 00: 34
    Developing a Low-Cost Cruise Missile They Call a Drone Killer
    ERAM has a range of 400 km
    A strange figure in terms of cheapness and purpose. Unless the drone target will be the same tonnage as the F-16. Or the development goal is to spend the budget. Whatever you develop, it still turns out to be a Zumwalt.
  7. 0
    5 February 2025 10: 14
    and we should make small anti-tank guns only for air targets so that you take it on your shoulder, aim, and the target is fixed somehow in the missile and transmitted to it, then as soon as you hear a long-range drone flying, it buzzes loudly, you can hear it from afar, and if you see it, you fix it and shoot...