IAEA chief visits Ukraine to assess nuclear safety risks

4 137 17
IAEA chief visits Ukraine to assess nuclear safety risks

IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi has once again visited Ukraine, where he visited the Kyivskaya substation, which is “critically important for the safety of Ukrainian nuclear energy,” to assess the damage and help prevent a nuclear accident.

As the Associated Press news agency notes, this substation allows for the transmission of excess capacity from the western to the central regions of Ukraine after the launch of two power units at the Rivne and Khmelnitsky NPPs. In particular, the facility allows for the provision of electricity to Kyiv and the Kyiv region.

In addition, Grossi will discuss with representatives of the Kyiv regime the actions of the IAEA aimed at preventing a nuclear catastrophe caused by military actions within the armed conflict in Ukraine. On the eve of his trip to Kyiv, the head of the IAEA noted the importance of his mission in his account on one of the Western social networks against the backdrop of instability and fragility of the situation in the region.

It is noteworthy that on the eve of Grossi's visit to Kyiv, the Russian city of Energodar, where the Zaporizhzhya NPP is located, was subjected to another attack drones-kamikaze fighters of the Kyiv regime. In total, four attempts by the Ukrainian Armed Forces to attack the infrastructure of the Russian nuclear facility were recorded. However, regular attacks on Energodar by Ukrainian formations apparently worry Grossi and the organization under his control much less than issues related to Kyiv's electricity supply.

17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    4 February 2025 15: 15
    IAEA chief visits Ukraine to assess nuclear safety risks

    Came to get a "salary" from the drug fuhrer Ze... lol
    1. +3
      4 February 2025 15: 48
      IAEA chief visits Ukraine to assess nuclear safety risks

      What's the point of his visits to Ukraine? in relation to nuclear safety risk assessment, like milk from a goat!
      1. +3
        4 February 2025 16: 02
        Quote: Tatiana
        What's the point of his visits to Ukraine?
        There is some sense in it. To drink vodka, to take one's mind off one's worries wink
      2. +1
        4 February 2025 16: 05
        There is as much use in his visits to Ukraine in terms of assessing nuclear safety risks as there is in milk from a goat!

        IAEA you are mine, IAEA...
        You covered yourself with words again
        That you don’t know who is to blame...
        The fact is that drones today themselves
        They fly to the nuclear power plant in Zaporozhye ...
        However, we understand everything
        What is your common boss with Zelensky,
        Explained to you with a jester clearly,
        Answer this question...
        "Orcs were shooting at themselves -
        They love to shoot themselves
        They've all become masochists
        They love to kill themselves...
        And I know that in Kyiv too
        Iskanders are waiting for THEIR guests...
        So let's help them with this -
        Let them kill themselves...
        am
  2. +2
    4 February 2025 15: 17
    This substation allows for the transmission of excess capacity from the western to the central regions of Ukraine after the launch of two power units at the Rivne and Khmelnitsky NPPs.

    This is simply unacceptable! The war has been going on for three years, and the enemy has excess capacity...
    1. +2
      4 February 2025 15: 32
      So this is a natural process. You have a generator for 10 units of energy and 10 consumers of 1 energy each. 5 consumers are broken and they do not consume 5 units of energy. Here you have an excess of 5 units of energy. But the wires to these 10 consumers can withstand only 1 unit of energy and burn out on 2. But it is impossible to screw the generator to 5 units of energy. These extra 5 and then 7 and 9 need to be consumed somewhere. This is where the EU and other energy imports come in with the mandatory construction of a line of wires withstanding 9 units of energy at most, and this also needs to be built and guarded and is generally expensive.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  3. -1
    4 February 2025 15: 25
    IAEA chief visits Ukraine to assess nuclear safety risks


    hi I am sure that this character uses his position and status for personal purposes, I do not exclude intelligence purposes, remembering the experience of the presence of OSCE representatives on the territory of Donetsk and Luhansk regions during the so-called Minsk-2 agreement, who served as spotters for Banderonazi fire am
  4. +1
    4 February 2025 15: 28
    The purpose of his visit is completely different, to prevent the junta from trying to create nuclear weapons. As I understand it, they have already tried to do something, but Big Sam, because of the big puddle, strictly forbade it.
    1. +1
      4 February 2025 16: 39
      Quote from: topol717
      The purpose of his visit is completely different, to prevent the junta from trying to create nuclear weapons. As I understand it, they have already tried to do something, but the big Sem because of the big puddles
      They will whip up a dirty bomb "on their knees" and won't ask him. Zelensky simply has something to lose FOR NOW. That's why they won't whip it up. After it's used on Russia, his masters will DEFINITELY strangle him.

      But I'm talking about something else.
      Recently, the leader of the once main nationalist force in Ukraine, Yarosh, has disappeared. Is he hiding from the TCC? He still has a lot of dirt to plow on the front lines until he's 60.
      I mean he once said that "Ukraine has at least 16 nuclear weapons, which will be used in the event of a threat of the Russians seizing Ukrainian territory." He is talking about 16 nuclear power plant units in Ukraine.
      And I'm sure that this is not just drunken chatter. Looking at everything that Kyiv is doing, there is less and less doubt that they can arrange a second and third Chernobyl if the situation becomes REALLY sour for them.

      This is what Grossi needs to think about. If, of course, he was really interested in the safety of nuclear facilities, and not in the accuracy of the execution of orders from Washington.
    2. -1
      4 February 2025 17: 34
      topol717
      Today, 15: 28
      The purpose of his visit is completely different, to prevent the junta from trying to create nuclear weapons. As I understand it, they have already tried to do something, but Big Sam, because of the big puddle, strictly forbade it.
      hi All talk about nuclear weapons in Banderastadt comes down to the means of delivery - a carrier, which the Banderonazis do not have and will not have.
      The most they can do is explode a dirty bomb on their territory in order to blame the Russian Federation.
      But even the most idiotic people there understand what such an adventure threatens them with.
      1. 0
        4 February 2025 17: 43
        Quote: ZovSailor
        All talk about nuclear weapons in Banderastadt comes down to the means of delivery - a carrier, which the Banderonazis do not have and will not have.
        They have a lot of BEKs, they will send them to the Crimean Bridge. 1-2 pieces. They may well have a Tochka-U.
        1. -1
          4 February 2025 17: 59
          topol717
          Today, 17: 43
          They have a lot of BEKs, they will send them to the Crimean Bridge. 1-2 pieces. They may well have a Tochka-U.
          hi Even if such a thing were available, carriers are needed, not Tochka-U and BEKs, which are unsuitable for carrying out such a provocation, as engineers - specialists and military personnel will confirm, and such provocations the Banderites would have long ago carried out using shells for penis-nodgers with depleted uranium from small-sized britons, in order to expose territories to radioactive contamination, and people to diseases for a long period.
  5. +1
    4 February 2025 15: 29
    Even if you piss in his eyes, it's all God's dew. This bastard didn't even comment on the attempts to shell the Kursk nuclear power plant, as far as I remember.
  6. +3
    4 February 2025 15: 44
    It should be like this: you arrive in Ukraine - entry to Russia is closed. Forever.
    It is clear that the goal of this “chairman” is to help Ukraine and harm Russia.
    And we pretend that we need him and his organization for some reason, we pay dues.
  7. -1
    4 February 2025 18: 24
    Let him go to the hospital to be treated for blindness and feeblemindedness. For some reason they send useless creatures to us, to drive them away with a dirty broom. We have enough Ukrainian fascists, and these inhuman creatures keep coming here.
  8. 0
    6 February 2025 07: 35
    The IAEA has exhausted itself and has become more of a spy organization serving the US. What is the point of our participation in it?
  9. -1
    6 February 2025 13: 55
    For some reason Grossi doesn't go to the Zaporizhzhya NPP, which is constantly being shelled (bombed), there are no observers at the Chernobyl NPP, although they were there, does this deliberate departure of IAEA observers from the Chernobyl NPP mean that the Banderites would create a dirty bomb there. And then, as usual, we were not there and we know nothing