Buggy in Special Operations

15 037 39
Buggy in Special Operations
Desertcross 1000-3 buggy at the training ground. Drivers are being trained. Photo by the Russian Ministry of Defense


As part of the Special Operation to Protect Donbass, the Russian army is actively using various types of vehicles, including all-terrain buggies. Light vehicles of this class have a number of important features and advantages that allow them to effectively perform various tasks at the front and in the rear. Thanks to this, thousands of such vehicles with different equipment and functions have already appeared in the troops.



Promising direction


The Russian army began experimenting with light all-terrain vehicles long before the Special Operation. Various organizations of the Ministry of Defense and combat units were actively involved in testing and mastering buggies, quad bikes and other similar vehicles. Other structures, such as the Russian National Guard, were also interested in this topic.

The exercises addressed various issues of operating such equipment. They also looked for and tested areas of its application. Buggies and other all-terrain vehicles were considered as general-purpose transport, as well as carriers of weapons or special equipment.


The Chaborz buggy is one of the first domestic examples of this class. Photo Telegram / "Ugolok Sitkha"

However, by the beginning of the Special Operation, our armed forces had not yet begun full-scale procurement and development of such equipment. Transportation of personnel in various conditions was still carried out using armored vehicles and traditional-looking automobiles.

Buggy in formation


As far as is known, the first buggies appeared in the Special Operations area already in 2022. A certain number of these vehicles were in the Rosgvardia units that took part in the hostilities. Later, similar vehicles began to appear in the armed forces units. However, so far, only small volumes of deliveries have been made through volunteer organizations.

The situation changed only in 2023. As it turned out, all this time the Ministry of Defense carefully studied the features of current military operations and determined the requirements of the troops. As a result, a decision was made to purchase new vehicles with a special combination of characteristics.


"Desertcross-1000-3" in the troops. Photo Telegram / Sashakots

An order for several thousand Chinese-made Desertcross 2023-1000 all-terrain vehicles was placed no later than mid-3. The ready-made imported vehicle was chosen for a number of reasons, including the possibility of early delivery. By mid-autumn, at least 500 new vehicles had already been delivered to the troops, and new batches were expected.

Various domestic manufacturers of automobile equipment have shown interest in the buggy theme. A number of enterprises have sent various samples of their own design and production to the troops. Some of these buggies were created in the recent past, while others were developed after the start of the Special Operation.

There are regular reports of new types of buggies and other similar vehicles being developed. These models are developed on an initiative basis, and their creators promise to send them to the combat zone in the near future for testing and assessment of their real potential. Most of these promises are successfully fulfilled.


A buggy of one of the models undergoing repairs. Photo by the Russian Ministry of Defense

Similarities and differences


By now, the Russian army has managed to form a fairly large park of buggies. The total number of such equipment, according to understandable data, is not openly published. However, available information allows us to assume that there are thousands of such machines in service. It is also possible to count up to ten types of this equipment.

All this equipment belongs to one class, which determines a certain similarity between the machines of different models. Buggies are built on the basis of a metal frame and receive rudimentary casing, only partially covering the crew cabin and cargo platform. The engine is located in the stern with the output of torque to the rear drive wheels.

Buggy requires high cross-country ability, which affects the suspension design. Most often, lever systems with springs and/or hydropneumatic shock absorbers are used. This ensures maximum suspension travel for a smoother ride over uneven surfaces.

The design of the engine and chassis widely uses units and assemblies from serial cars, mainly domestically produced. Such a choice of components simplifies the process of production and maintenance of equipment, and also improves economic indicators.


Buggy on the route. The station is visible on the roof of the car EW... Photo of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

All-terrain vehicles have a two- or four-seater open-type cabin. There is also a rear cargo platform, which can accommodate additional crew seats, for example, for a gunner. Standard armor protection is usually not provided, but the troops often use add-on armor elements and canopies to protect against attacks from above.

Buggies can be equipped with pivot mounts for mounting various weapons. Most often, they carry machine guns of the main types or anti-tank missile complexes. Thanks to the open design of the cabin, the crew can freely use personal weaponSome models are even equipped with additional means for mounting weapons near the cabin.

Since the enemy has large stockpiles of UAVs for various purposes, buggies receive appropriate protection. Electronic warfare systems are mounted on them, sharply reducing the probability of detection and destruction.

Applications


An all-terrain buggy is, first and foremost, a vehicle capable of transporting people and cargo on the road or terrain, overcoming obstacles, etc. The transport capabilities of such equipment are used in several ways, depending on the unit in which it serves and what tasks are set.


Loading a wounded man before evacuation. Photo by the Russian Ministry of Defense

The buggy can be a transport for riflemen, scouts, assault troops, etc. On such a machine, fighters can quickly arrive at the required location and begin performing the assigned task. High mobility will help breakthrough, and the weapons on the machine will be used for fire support.

The transport function is also used in logistics - buggies work as light trucks for delivering ammunition and other things. In addition, they are used as ambulances for evacuating the wounded to the rear.

All-terrain vehicles are widely used as carriers of various weapons and transport for their crews. Such vehicles increase the mobility of ATGMs and portable/carried mortars. In all cases, it is possible to simplify the work of personnel, as well as increase the speed of leaving a position that is of critical importance.


Anti-UAV buggy. Photo by Russian Defense Ministry

The Ministry of Defense recently demonstrated a specialized combat vehicle for combating unmanned aerial vehicles. This buggy-car was equipped with a turret with several automatic rifles and a combat module with smooth-bore firing devices. It is reported that such weapons are highly effective in combating small air targets.

Experiments and results


Thus, the experiments of the past years and the experience of the Special Operation influenced the state and prospects of our army's vehicle fleet. It was decided to supplement the existing cars and armored vehicles with lighter equipment with improved cross-country ability and mobility.

From 2022-24, a fairly large fleet of buggies of various models was created in the troops, and now this equipment is actively used to solve a wide range of tasks. At the same time, the industry, represented by various organizations and enterprises, develops new models of equipment, presents them for testing and then brings them to series production.

By now, buggies have shown their potential and found their place in the troops. It is obvious that the army will not refuse such equipment in the future and will continue to develop this area. At the same time, in the near future, such development, for obvious reasons, will proceed at an increased pace.
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    29 January 2025 04: 59
    By now, the buggies have shown their potential and found their place in the troops.
    Look how everything has changed - from armor protection to open platforms...
    1. 0
      29 January 2025 11: 50
      It's surprising that they didn't install a windshield at least for the driver. They could have made a folding one out of organic glass or transparent polycarbonate. Judging by the photos, this looks like some very strict savings.
      1. +2
        29 January 2025 20: 56
        Perhaps the minimum configuration, after all, some buy it, and others fight request
      2. +1
        2 February 2025 01: 08
        It's not surprising at all. Like many other things done hastily and slapdash.
  2. 0
    29 January 2025 05: 37
    in my opinion the appearance of FPV drones put an end to unarmored vehicles in a strip of up to 10-20 km
    1. +4
      29 January 2025 08: 13
      in my opinion the appearance of FPV drones put an end to unarmored vehicles in a strip of up to 10-20 km

      and on armored ones too, and on towed and self-propelled artillery... it put an end to many things. That's why there are small arms battles using the same UAVs.
      1. +1
        29 January 2025 10: 10
        Only because the air defense cannot get rid of the reconnaissance drones that guide artillery and FPV.
    2. 0
      29 January 2025 14: 45
      Quote from iommy
      in my opinion the appearance of FPV drones put an end to unarmored vehicles in a strip of up to 10-20 km

      No, it didn't. The technology is actively used.
    3. 0
      3 February 2025 21: 13
      This is only your opinion. But in reality it is in great demand, because you can't do much fighting on foot.
  3. +2
    29 January 2025 06: 41
    Has some usefulness, but these offer 0 protection from drones...
  4. +3
    29 January 2025 09: 10
    The photographs show massive mechanisms with a capacity of 2-3 people, and a rudimentary body, which, of course, does not include stretchers with the wounded, which is clearly visible in the photo. All this (as well as the purchase of as many as 500 vehicles) is a consequence of the fact that the buggies underwent "comprehensive testing" at the dachas and country houses of the Big Bosses. Apparently, they continue to undergo them there, since there are no other photos.
    The troops need three types of vehicles of this class.
    1. Transport platforms for 8-10 people with side disembarkation/embarkation without roofs, shields, etc. Frame, engine, some suspension and that's it. Such platforms can quickly move a group of fighters, as well as take out the wounded, and quickly transfer weapons and ammunition.
    2. A motorized platform for one scout, with an advanced muffler and boxes for weapons/supplies.
    3. A platform with a weapon like a light mortar or something similar that needs to be quickly transferred to the battlefield. Not a KAMAZ or a tank, but a lightweight lattice platform with an engine.
    Our Ministry of Defense doesn't even think about doing or ordering anything like that. They just quickly collected it from the generals' dachas for a photo shoot...
    1. -3
      29 January 2025 09: 36
      What about LUAZ 967?
      take an engine from an Oka and go ahead. But of course this won't happen - domestic production in the Russian Federation is simply not a competitor compared to China.
      1. +1
        29 January 2025 10: 08
        It's one thing to pay money and get the goods you need today. It's another thing to organize the production of a car using the technology of the 60s.
      2. 0
        29 January 2025 13: 28
        You can assemble ready-made units. The engine, wheels, suspension are purchased, the steel frames are your own, welded. There are entire institutes that train automotive engineers...
    2. 0
      1 February 2025 08: 09
      The buggies were "extensively tested" at summer cottages and country houses
      Golf car
      1. 0
        2 February 2025 18: 03
        No. It growls too loudly. It's for a gentleman's hunt. The Cool Hunter importantly spreads his ass on the seat, places a gun worth many thousands of greenbacks next to him, and the huntsman gets behind the wheel to quickly get to the tied-up game, otherwise the Cool Hunter might get hungry. The luxurious body, into which the extras in the photo try to shove a stretcher with a person, but they don't fit, even when they remove the seat in front, is for the prey.
  5. 0
    29 January 2025 10: 06
    Probably, the Chinese simply did not want to sell us anything more substantial and clearly military-oriented than the Dongfeng Mengshi or the SWS2 air defense missile and gun system. They bought what they had.
    1. +1
      29 January 2025 11: 47
      In this class we have our own "Tiger". Why overpay the Chinese?
      1. +1
        29 January 2025 20: 55
        Tigers still need to be churned out, I don’t know how it is now, but before, there used to be something like hundreds of them produced per year.
        1. -1
          30 January 2025 11: 40
          It is difficult to find information on the cost of military equipment now. There is only not very reliable data from bloggers. If you rely on them, then the Tiger costs 4,8 million, and the BTR-82A costs 28 million rubles. Six Tiger armored vehicles in the current conditions look preferable to one APC for most army tasks. Namely, in conditions when armored vehicles turned out to be practically defenseless against enemy drones.
          While BTR-8A are produced in hundreds or dozens, Tigers need to be churned out in the thousands.
          1. 0
            30 January 2025 13: 05
            Of course it is necessary, but the production line for the armored personnel carriers was built back in the USSR, and the Tigers are a new product, I think that in order to seriously increase their production, significant efforts are needed. But how much of such efforts do we see? The statistics for Lancets, Geraniums or UMPs have hardly changed since mid-2023, they reached a certain amount, like fifty per day, and that's it. In this context, it is interesting, of course, to calculate - how much is currently spent on the State Defense Order? Five hundred new tanks per year in terms of money is that, a billion bucks? There is no sense of scale and effort...
            1. 0
              30 January 2025 13: 11
              You are judging something you have no clear idea about. These machines even have common components. And how are you supposed to know about the availability and workload of production capacities? And here everything depends on the volume of the order. If the Ministry of Defense, instead of restoring the nuclear cruiser, had ordered several thousand Tigers, I believe they would already be available.
              1. +2
                30 January 2025 14: 20
                Yes, I have no idea. In my experience in Russia, even the direct executor has a hard time understanding certain management decisions, since the bosses have a lot of personal stuff. Maybe you can kick back more from expensive armored personnel carriers, but little from cheap Tigers, and the manufacturer has more trouble with them (the Tiger is 4 times cheaper, but you need 4 times more engines, for example, to make 4 times more transport for the same money). Maybe some Tiger lover was undermined in the troops, and according to our tradition, everything that the previous person did must be screwed up and broken so that there was no spirit left. Maybe some general got his finger pinched in the door of a Tiger. Our staff and the ministry have not yet started fighting, and military necessity is not the main criterion for selection.
                1. 0
                  30 January 2025 14: 27
                  Maybe so. There may be personal reasons and anything, including following the erroneous concept of rearmament. And in conditions when mopeds have become an urgent necessity, a more or less protected, purely military, vehicle would not be superfluous. It would be useful in large quantities more than individual BTR-82As.
  6. +4
    29 January 2025 12: 23
    Gargashyan recently presented a new budget all-terrain vehicle AG23. In essence, it is a spitting image of a front-line transporter! Such vehicles can be riveted in large quantities and inexpensively.
    1. +1
      29 January 2025 15: 56
      It won't do the trick. It has every chance of becoming a favorite target of FPV operators. But yes, it is wonderful in its simplicity, reliability, cross-country ability and simplicity.
      1. 0
        30 January 2025 11: 43
        It doesn't look great. Judging by the video, it doesn't have any springs or shock absorbers at all.
        Both the driver and passengers will be exhausted and the cargo will be damaged.
        1. +1
          30 January 2025 14: 13
          None. And in the video the passengers really do ride like in a trough. But I hope the author will at least install torsion bars so as not to complicate and not inflate the dimensions of the suspension.
          I saw something similar in the mid-nineties near Tyumen, where local Kulibins designed something very similar, controlled like a tractor, and set up a very small-scale production of them. Our people are brilliant after all!
          1. +1
            1 February 2025 08: 48
            where local Kulibins constructed something very similar

            in the USSR there were LuAZ-967, LUAZ-969, LUAZ-1901, loaf +- fits
        2. 0
          2 February 2025 20: 20
          Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
          Judging by the video, it has no springs or shock absorbers at all.

          Of course. Also, the speed of the vehicle for moving soldiers across rough terrain should in no case exceed 20 km/h. Only from the sofa and the general's chair can you see peacetime speeds, shock absorbers, springs...
          20 km/h is a huge speed compared to the 3-4 km/h that fighters can reach on foot in this area. And which can be achieved either by the lightest platforms or by huge Urals. Terribly vulnerable. At such a speed, shock absorbers only increase the danger and uselessly make the vehicle heavier. The fighters, not being armchair experts, will take a rest from the march on foot. And the cargo will survive, because with skillful driving, light all-terrain vehicles do not shake at all at this speed) And if they do roll into a puddle, the fighters will simply lift the platform and move it to a dry place. Moreover, a platform for 10 people has excellent protection from drones, which is difficult to provide in any other way, namely, concentrated fire from ten barrels. Well, there is much more ...
          1. +1
            3 February 2025 03: 26
            Ideally, both options should be made and submitted for military testing. Otherwise, we really know better from our couches and we don’t take many factors into account. But the cart is worthy of the MoD’s attention in any case.
  7. 0
    29 January 2025 13: 30
    Quote: Mikhail3
    You can assemble ready-made units. The engine, wheels, suspension are purchased, the steel frames are your own, welded. There are entire institutes that train automotive engineers...

    Rather, they were. And it's not just about engineers - mechanical engineering is dying in the Russian Federation - by and large, modern society doesn't need it - most people are idiots, no matter how you look at it.
  8. +2
    29 January 2025 14: 42
    Buggies (although the article's photo does not show buggies, but cars for golf club maintenance personnel, etc.) are a rarity at the front. These are mainly quad bikes, UAZs, VAZs, mopeds, etc., bought with personal money.
  9. +2
    29 January 2025 15: 59
    Wasn't it his (Desertcross 1000-3) that Shoyga and his comrades proudly demonstrated to the top official, telling him what ingenious engineering creations were born in the depths of the wearers of general's caps?
  10. +1
    29 January 2025 16: 27
    There are guys in St. Petersburg who make custom adapters from Chinese motors for walk-behind tractors to gearboxes from Zhiguli and Ural motorcycles. So what's the problem with scaling up the production of these parts specifically for Ural motorcycles?! The army doesn't need Euro 5 standards - so you can buy as many motors at once as you can find the money for at the moment - the rest is already there. The problem with our production is that no one can sharply increase the number of products manufactured. And there was a time when they produced and sold !!! 130.000 Ural motorcycles in one year in 1993... Over the past 30 years, they haven't assembled even 100.000. Now they sell less than 30.000 motorcycles per year. And that's together with mopeds, and maybe even with ATVs.
    1. 0
      30 January 2025 11: 57
      That's true, that's true of course. But again, we don't need Ural motorcycles, but rather quad bikes with a buggy design.
  11. 0
    29 January 2025 22: 13
    At first glance at these, if you will, "buggy", without even going into their specifications, it is clear that these are, at best, vehicles with increased cross-country ability, a real buggy should have large, widely spaced wheels, with a very high ground clearance and maximum working travel of the suspension elements, it is important not only not to get stuck in the mud, but also to drive through heavily pitted terrain with piles of soil, holes and ruts, and to do this as quickly as possible....
    1. 0
      30 January 2025 11: 58
      Do you know that when there is no maid, they have fun with the janitor? Well, this is it, that very case.
  12. 0
    3 February 2025 21: 32
    A space frame, a reinforced chassis from a Niva and a turbo six. This is the recipe for a cheap buggy in modern Russian reality. You can rivet thousands for a relatively small budget. Everything else is either more complicated or more expensive.