"Balanced" machine gun on SVO

42 806 87
"Balanced" machine gun on SVO

Information on the use of specific domestic types of small arms in the SVO zone weapons appeared earlier. But not so long ago a new photo of the A-545 machine gun with balanced automation appeared, which made us remember this interesting model.


That same photo of the A-545 "Kord" that stirred up the information field and made people talk again about the successor to the AEK-971.

If the A-545 index doesn’t mean anything to you, then perhaps the name AEK-971 is familiar to you. The assault rifle in question is the heir to the ideas and engineering solutions laid down in this product by Kovrov gunsmiths back in the days of the USSR. In general, in open sources the A-545, to simplify a bit, is often called a “modernized AEK-971”. Is this true and what is the general story of this weapon?




Soldiers of the special forces of the Russian Interior Ministry in the Caucasus, 2000s. One of them is armed with an AEK-971.


The assault rifle presented for the R&D competition "Ratnik" was very different in appearance from its ancestor. The weapons engineers did a great job to improve the ergonomics and operational characteristics of the weapon. In the photo above is the AEK-971, below is the A-545.

The history of the AEK-971 began when the R&D project "Abakan" was launched by the decision of the Commission of the Presidium of the Council of Ministers of the USSR on military-industrial issues No. 280 of 27.08.81. The idea was to increase the accuracy of the machine gun, and the accuracy of automatic fire and when firing from awkward positions: standing, kneeling, etc. As we now know, the AEK-971 did not become a winner. Moreover, it did not even make it to the final of the "competition".


The "guts" of the A-545, the same balanced automation. Yes, it is more complex than a regular AK, but simpler than the AN-94.

And then what happened happened. The winner of the Abakan R&D project, the AN-94 Abakan, received the GRAU index, went into production... and that's it. It was produced a little, fought a little, but did not win any love in the troops and did not go beyond the framework of "few, expensive, complicated." In order to achieve those same characteristics of accuracy when conducting automatic fire, everything else was, in fact, sacrificed. Anyone who has seen a partial disassembly of this machine gun can understand what I'm talking about. It is not just complicated in comparison with the Kalashnikov system, but very complicated. Here we can also add ergonomic features, such as the magazine, which is attached not vertically downwards, but with a deviation to the right. Well, that is, a person accustomed to reloading an AK will not even be able to immediately attach the magazine to the AN-94. Add to this the more than impressive weight (the loaded machine gun is more than half a kilogram heavier than the loaded AK-74) and it becomes really sad.


A-545 of a special forces soldier in a PVD in the SVO zone. According to the "operator" himself, the Picatinny rail for installing the bipod and handle had to be attached to the fore-end with screws, the standard one is missing in this place, and there is simply no commercial fore-end for this system.

What about the AEK-97? What is it and how is the accuracy of automatic fire increased? A balance beam, identical in weight to the bolt group, is added to the automatic unit. The bolt carrier and balance beam are connected via toothed racks and a gear inside the bolt carrier. The pistons of the carrier and balance beam act as the front and rear walls of the gas chamber. At the moment of firing, under the influence of powder gases, they begin to move simultaneously in opposite directions at equal speeds, and their movement impulses compensate each other.


A-545 in the special forces air defense zone.

It doesn't sound very complicated, and in reality, it was. Although the system didn't give the same results as the AN-94, it turned out to be simpler and lighter. It's no surprise that the security agencies paid attention to the machine gun. Its small-scale production and purchase by the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation began. In the hands of fighters from various units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the machine gun fought in both Chechen wars.


A-545 lies at the feet of its "operator" in the SVO zone

Well, the story of our hero begins in the 2010s with the R&D project "Ratnik". Moreover, according to the initial requirements, two assault rifles were to be developed for 5,45x39 mm and 7,62x39 mm cartridges. This is how the A-545 and A-762 appeared in Kovrov. It is more than clear which model was created for which cartridge. The Kovrov engineers reworked their design, which was already thirty years old at that time. The principle of recoil compensation did not change, but the external appearance of the assault rifle, according to the R&D requirements, changed very much. If you place the AEK-97 and the A-545 side by side, you may not realize at first that this is, in fact, the same weapon. Sights, forend, receiver cover, Picatinny rails and, probably, the biggest visual difference is the folding telescopic buttstock, which we associate more with the products of Heckler & Koch GmbH.


A special forces soldier in a Ghillie suit observes the enemy. An A-545 stands against the wall behind him.

And then this is what happens: the Kovrov assault rifles pass the tests in 2014 and are recommended for adoption, while the Izhevsk assault rifles are recognized as not meeting the tactical and technical requirements. True, in 2015 everything changed, the AK-12 and AK-15 became winners, while the A-545 and A-762 lost the competition. What happened? Somewhere they write that the results of the tests in 2014 became a bucket of cold water on the heads of the effective managers of Kalashnikov Concern OJSC, and they came to their senses, somewhere they write that they did not come to their senses, but turned on their administrative resources to the fullest, but be that as it may, the Kovrov assault rifle with balanced automation was again left overboard. But not quite...


A-545 in the SVO zone

As before, at the turn of the 1980s and 1990s, the creation of the designers of the Degtyarev Plant was noticed. It was obvious that this was not a machine gun for a mass conscription army, but its characteristics could be useful to special forces specialists. In 2018, the machine gun with balanced automation A-545 under the designation GRAU 6P67 and the name "Kord" was accepted into service by the RF Armed Forces. In 2019, information appeared that the machine gun would be supplied to the Special Operations Forces and army special forces units, and in 2020 from News it was possible to find out that the weapon had already entered service with the special forces units of the Eastern Military District.


A-545 of a special forces soldier in the SVO zone.

Photos of the A-545 from the SVO zone have appeared before. But the latest photo allows us to understand that the product of the gunsmiths from Kovrov continues to fight successfully in the hands of special forces. There are practically no reviews of this weapon from the SVO zone. This is the specificity of those who fight with these machine guns, and their work itself. It is only known that special forces with the A-545 look with some envy at their colleagues with Kalashnikov machine guns, since they do not have access to such a large number of commercial tuning for their "tool". Manufacturers of commercial "body kits" are simply not familiar with such a highly specialized and rare system as the A-545. But still, this is clearly a trifle against the background of the other advantages of the machine gun.

Be that as it may, it is pleasant to see that such a unique and original system as the Kovrov A-545 has tasks in the SVO zone and that there are specialists who are able to appreciate all the advantages of this wonderful and unique weapon.
87 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    28 January 2025 05: 27
    Here we can also add ergonomic features, such as a magazine that is not attached vertically downwards, but with a deviation to the right. That is, a person accustomed to reloading an AK will not even be able to attach a magazine to an AN-94 right away.

    It is even very convenient to change the magazine with the right hand, especially in the prone position. This is for the especially gifted who change the magazine with the left hand, with a twist, it will be inconvenient to shoot "training" videos in the shooting range.
    1. -9
      28 January 2025 07: 50
      The only problem with reloading can be with the bolt and only when the chamber is empty, but smart people came up with a bolt catch for such things! They even tried to stuff such "space technologies" into the AK, but it didn't work...
      PS: in my opinion, we should have considered the possibility of producing equipment and weapons under license a long time ago, there is nothing terrible about it, for those who like to shout about dependence on Western suppliers and sanctions, I will remind you - we already have a lot of imported "guts", like thermal imagers, microchips, etc. (and I have not even touched on rifle tuning). But the domestic weapons lobby does not allow this to happen, sometimes providing rare g…
      1. +5
        28 January 2025 10: 01
        The slide catch fit into the AK. But there is one nuance. It fit only with the replacement of all the magazines. That is, there is no slide catch on the old magazines.
        1. +2
          28 January 2025 10: 25
          The issue is not about the stores at all, Mikhail Timofeevich answered the question of the slide stop in the AK back in the late 80s. The design bureau initially considered such a possibility, but without a major redesign and complication of the machine, there is no way to securely fix the slide in the rear position, which can lead to an accidental shot.
          1. +3
            28 January 2025 14: 26
            I'm not talking about the USSR, but about ours. The slide stop was made on the AK-12 in the first models. But it only worked on special magazines.

            If I'm not mistaken, SVD has a similar principle.
  2. +4
    28 January 2025 06: 50
    The whole article is a waste of time. Well, and not without nonsense
    It is only known that the special forces with the A-545 look with some envy at their colleagues with Kalashnikov assault rifles, since they do not have access to such a quantity of commercial tuning for
  3. +7
    28 January 2025 07: 31
    AK-12 and AK-15 became winners, and A-545 and A-762 lost the competition. What happened? Somewhere they write that the results of the tests in 2014for effective managers of JSC "Kalashnikov Concern" became a bucket of cold water on their heads, and they came to their senses, somewhere they write that they did not come to their senses, but turned on the administrative resource at full power,

    wherever you spit, there's a Kalashnikov...
    And where is the FAS RF looking?
    but what about Federal Law 135 and its implementation?
  4. +5
    28 January 2025 07: 34
    There are practically no reviews of this weapon from the SVO zone. This is the specificity of those who fight with these machines, and their work itself. It is only known that special forces with A-545 look with some envy at their colleagues with Kalashnikov machine guns, since they do not have access to such a quantity of commercial tuning for their "instrument"

    There are no reviews, but they look with envy...like clowns with machine guns, dressed up with "commercial tuning" like a Christmas tree. At least the A-545,762 has a steel buttstock, unlike the breakable "commercial" butts of the AK-12
    1. +4
      29 January 2025 08: 33
      Where did you get this information? And, yes, the most common in the units operating on the LBS is not the AK-12, but the AK-74M. You can read about this machine from Popenker.
      And yes, according to the table of contents I was supposed to have a PM. It was believed that tankers already had a cannon and two machine guns (PKT and NSVT), why would they need an assault rifle? Unless they were on guard duty. :-)
  5. +20
    28 January 2025 07: 37
    I shot from AEK many times, a long time ago, the machine gun is gorgeous! You hold it at arm's length and it puts everything on target, slightly moves to the side, almost imperceptibly, essentially an automatic sniper rifle. And a thoroughly commercial, corrupt concern, essentially a monopolist, simply crushed it, the guys there will still be modernizing the old stuff for many years and selling it as a new breakthrough. Such a country
    1. +4
      28 January 2025 19: 24
      Then, maybe it was worth thinking about some kind of RPK with balanced automation. At the very beginning of the SVO, they showed Wagnerites who used the RPK-74 as a sniper rifle in urban combat. And they claimed that the accuracy of the RPK-74 was quite sufficient for them.
      1. +4
        29 January 2025 02: 02
        Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
        At the very beginning of the SVO, they showed Wagnerites using the RPK-74 as a sniper rifle in urban combat

        This is actually a very old jihadist invention. For example, in Iraq, the famous sniper who was shooting at American soldiers on video until he was caught used an RPK converted into a sniper rifle.
        1. -1
          30 January 2025 11: 53
          And the Serbs have a sniper rifle, which is based on the AK, converted to the 7.72x54R cartridge.
        2. -1
          30 January 2025 13: 26
          You didn't understand what we're talking about. A machine gun with balanced automatics turned out to be unsuitable for installing an underbarrel grenade launcher. And this is not required for the RPK. Increased shooting accuracy, including bursts, may be in demand in modern conditions. There are better units purely as a sniper weapon.
          And so, yes, the RPK is more accurate than the machine gun.
    2. -2
      28 January 2025 20: 08
      That the An94 and AEK are better than the AK, it's high time to rearm the army with them. But this will never happen. For two reasons, the first is the administrative lobby for the AK, the second is huge investments in production and rearmament. Meanwhile, in the West, huge funds are constantly being invested in the development of small arms. We are lagging behind. All these arguments that these machines are no better are complete nonsense, better, but more complex, and the army requires more complex weapons.
    3. 0
      29 January 2025 17: 21
      Quote: Vadim S
      I shot from AEK many times, a long time ago, the machine gun is gorgeous! You hold it at arm's length and it puts everything on target, slightly moves to the side, almost imperceptibly, essentially an automatic sniper rifle.

      You can deceive yourself, but deceiving other people is a dirty business. What is the purpose of your deception, Vadim?
      The A545 and A762 are interesting weapons, but nothing more. Apart from a SLIGHTLY better automatic fire accuracy, they have no other advantages, even of a purely operational or ergonomic nature, over the AKM/AK74M series of assault rifles. In the 80s, the ASM designed by G.N. Nikonov, in a FAIR, I note, competitive fight, beat the AEK series assault rifles, because automatic fire accuracy was, although important, far from the only evaluation criterion. The oldest and most experienced tester at TsNIITochMash, V.G. Gvozdev, who unfortunately passed away in 2024, spoke about many twists and turns of that competition, but considered its outcome to be absolutely fair - the AEK was completely inferior to the ASM.
      Regarding the difference between the A545 and AK74M/AK200 in terms of automatic fire accuracy, I could tell you a lot myself, since I took direct part in their comparative tests in 2021, but the adherents of the "balanced automation" sect are unlikely to be interested in dry numbers - they will simply ignore them.
      1. 0
        6 February 2025 10: 37
        but the adherents of the "balanced automation" sect are unlikely to be interested in dry numbers - they will simply ignore them.

        Given the choice between the AK-12 and the A-545, most preferences go to the latter.
        At the very bottom you can read a live review from a soldier about this machine gun.
        Kalashnikov's lobby is everywhere.
  6. +3
    28 January 2025 08: 49
    No Stalin, no Degtyarev: the competitions were won by the one with the longest administrative resources.
    1. +2
      28 January 2025 11: 53
      Quote: Ezekiel 25-17
      No Stalin, no Degtyarev: the competitions were won by the one with the longest administrative resources.

      Mwa-ha-ha... it's hard to surpass Stalin's era in terms of administrative resources.
      Thus, the winner of the competition for a new submachine gun for the Red Army in 1942 was determined not by the results of tests, but in a heated battle between the People's Commissariat of Armaments (which came out in favor of the PPSh-2) and the Main Artillery Directorate (which came out in favor of the PPS), with the involvement in the dispute of the notorious Deputy Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars - a man in pince-nez.
  7. -2
    28 January 2025 09: 17
    Damn, it's high time to think about a more powerful cartridge, and it's not 6*41, but our 5,45 is still tormenting us.
    1. +3
      28 January 2025 09: 59
      more powerful is 7.62 or 9 or even 11.42?
      1. +4
        28 January 2025 10: 01
        Quote from: nepunamemuk
        more powerful is 7.62 or 9 or even 11.42?

        It depends on the length of the sleeve, I indicated it, but you didn’t.
        1. -3
          28 January 2025 12: 18
          The last time I saw a machine gun was 38 years ago
          AKM
          that's why the length of the sleeve is not relevant for me
          I saw a 12.7 caliber machine gun in action on YouTube
          what can you say about this drinks
          1. +1
            28 January 2025 16: 24
            Quote from: nepunamemuk
            that's why the length of the sleeve is not relevant for me

            Well, if it’s not relevant, then it’s not relevant, although, in the calibers you mentioned, in addition to 11,43, there are also pistol, machine gun, and even rifle cartridges.

            Quote from: nepunamemuk
            I saw a 12.7 caliber machine gun in action on YouTube
            what can you say about this
            The fact that this machine gun has a weaker cartridge than a machine gun, and even a rifle, but stronger than a pistol. And all because of the length of the cartridge case. wink
            1. +1
              29 January 2025 01: 10
              The fact that this machine gun has a weaker cartridge than a machine gun, and even a rifle, but stronger than a pistol. And all because of the length of the cartridge case. wink
              Well, if you declared yourself such a specialist..., then I dare to note that there is no such cartridge as "a machine gun" and "even a rifle" - these two categories of weapons have one cartridge - RIFLE (from a good long case)! Meaning, figuratively speaking, full-fledged machine guns and rifles...
              The rest I agree with you. wink
              1. -1
                29 January 2025 03: 10
                Quote: militarist63
                I dare to note that there is no such cartridge as "a machine gun" and "even a rifle" - these two categories of weapons have one cartridge - a RIFLE (from a good, long sleeve)!

                No, dear Victor, 12,7 is a machine gun cartridge, if we take military weapons. And then it was adapted to rifles, and in some cases in a subsonic version, which means less powerful than a full machine gun cartridge. wink
      2. 0
        29 January 2025 01: 59
        more powerful is 7.62 or 9 or even 11.42
        Dear Sir! Thompson's brainchild had a caliber of 11,43 mm, so what? It was quite suitable for gangster showdowns over moonshine markets, but for combat operations - crap! wink
        And about your
        I saw a 12.7 caliber machine gun in action on YouTube
        what can you say about this
        I will answer for the one to whom you addressed this. As I understand it, you had the honor of watching a movie about the ASH-12... Excuse me, come down to earth! The ASH-12 is an assault rifle for special tasks (that's why it is only in service with the FSB)! The cartridge that is used in the ASH-12 is not at all for infantry! If you did not understand, then here we are discussing mass small arms specifically for linear infantry units! Have you tried (in addition to shooting... well, a long time ago) walking through the mountains loaded, among other things..., with several ammo for your assault rifle?! Well, not even through the mountains, but simply "through the valleys and hills"...? Note that the cartridge for the ASH-12 (SC-130 cartridge) weighs (at least) as much as THREE 7,62PS CARTRIDGES, which you last fired 38 years ago and which are the main ones for the AKM! I won't even mention the 5,45PS (which is lighter than the 7,62PS)...
  8. +1
    28 January 2025 10: 17
    I wonder how reliable it is in field conditions with increased pollution and high rate of fire? Even the boys' Kalashnikovs jammed during intense combat!
  9. -3
    28 January 2025 11: 06
    This flimsy retractable buttstock doesn't inspire confidence even from the monitor screen, it's probably impossible to install an underbarrel grenade launcher, not to mention the ergonomics when shooting with optics.
  10. +1
    28 January 2025 11: 27
    The winner of the Abakan R&D project, the AN-94 Abakan, received the GRAU index, went into production... and that's it. It was produced a little, fought a little, but did not win any love in the troops and did not go beyond the framework of "few, expensive, complicated." In order to achieve those same characteristics of accuracy when conducting automatic fire, everything else was, in fact, sacrificed. Anyone who has seen a partial disassembly of this machine gun can understand what I'm talking about. It is not just complicated, in comparison with the Kalashnikov system, but very complicated.

    I haven't held it in my hands, I haven't shot it..., BUT:
    remembering shooting from the SVT, Mauser and three-line rifle - I understand that this is a similar story...
    The SVT "didn't go down well" with the Red Army soldiers - it was complicated and demanding, while shooting from it - (in my opinion) was the most comfortable, I don't even mention the reload time...
    so maybe the story with Abakan...
    1. +2
      28 January 2025 11: 57
      Quote: Dedok
      The SVT "didn't go down well" with the Red Army soldiers - it was complicated and demanding

      Considering the training of pre-war Red Army soldiers, this is not surprising.
      In parts of 97 SD rifles manufactured in 1940. , which were on hand for no more than 4 months, up to 29% are reduced to a state of rust in the barrel, machine guns "DP" manufactured in 1939 to 14% also have a deterioration of the barrel channels.
      © The KOVO weapons verification act for the 1940th year.
      And this is in the best division in the Red Army in 1940:
      The headquarters of the division was rated as the most advanced in the Red Army and was awarded the challenge prize of the General Staff. For the organization of combat and political training and the training of troops, the division commander, Major General I. Sherstyuk, was awarded the Order of the Red Banner.
      1. +7
        28 January 2025 13: 40
        If only it were that simple. There are many factors that can cause rust. Starting with the quality of the gun lubricant itself and simply its availability along with cleaning devices. In our case, the case inside each AK-74 in the army was empty. It also depends on the quality of the gun steel and the composition of the gunpowder.
        1. -1
          28 January 2025 15: 47
          Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
          If only it were that simple. There are many factors that can cause rust. Starting with the quality of the gun lubricant itself and simply its presence along with cleaning devices.

          The main factor was that personal and group matters were simply not cleaned.
          The disdainful attitude towards the instruction on the storage and conservation of weapons in military units / § 222, 242 /, ignorance of the device of automatic weapons, its disassembly rules were brought to such a state that automatic rifles "ABC", submachine guns "Degtyarev", when disassembled by hardening started in the gas paths, the entire gas exhaust unit is covered with rust, the surface of the barrel and other parts are heavily rusty. The same state of gas paths and the DP machine guns.

          139 cn: The commanding staff does not dare to carry out a complete disassembly of the rifles to remove dirt and rust, as the battle of the rifles has changed.

          To great shame, and chagrin, cadet regiment schools have lesser knowledge of small arms than the knowledge of the Red Army, and yet despite this they are issued by junior commanders.
          There is no need to talk about the rules, cleaning weapons, and their inspection by younger commanders.
          This situation should be, since the commander, having no knowledge of small arms, cannot transfer them to his subordinates and demand knowledge from them when he himself does not know him.

          And like a cherry on a cake:
          Unfortunately, there are still commanders like Junior Lieutenant Comrade NN (791st Rifle Regiment), who has only 6 rifles in his unit, and upon inspection all the rifles were found to be rusty, as was his personal revolver "Nagant", in the cylinder of which there were three spent cartridges. The revolver, according to Junior Lieutenant Comrade XXX, was not cleaned after shooting for 3 months.
          © Order to the troops of the 5th Army "On the results of the inspection of artillery property and in units of the 135th rifle division, 36th light artillery brigade, 330th artillery regiment and corps units of the 27th corps.
          1. 0
            30 January 2025 12: 06
            There is always a black sheep. Don't judge the KA because of one lieutenant.
        2. +3
          28 January 2025 17: 49
          In our case, the case inside every AK-74 in the army was empty.

          Yes, ... unexpectedly. In our SA, each AKM-7,62 was in a complete set. And after shooting, right at the shooting range, oil was dripped into each barrel. And it was always like that. Of course, we cleaned it in the barracks. Combat conditions are, of course, something else.
          1. -1
            28 January 2025 18: 52
            Really AKM-7,62? Well, then, either it was a long time ago, or the unit was not a motorized rifle.
            1. +2
              28 January 2025 22: 37
              The unit was not a motorized rifle unit.

              OTR brigade - early 70s. 5,56 did not exist yet.
              1. -1
                29 January 2025 11: 25
                Of course, I'm terribly sorry, but where did you find 5,56 mm? The USSR had a 5,45 mm caliber.
                1. +3
                  29 January 2025 15: 31
                  but where did you find 5,56 mm

                  Well, yes ! I got it mixed up, but 5,45 didn’t exist in the USSR at that time.
    2. +4
      28 January 2025 12: 17
      The SVT "didn't go down well" with the Red Army soldiers - it was complicated and demanding
      - the Marines really liked it though. Different training and school)
      1. -4
        28 January 2025 12: 27
        Judging by the video, it's a cuckoo clock. It won't fly. hi

        https://yandex.ru/video/preview/5906812857253014340
        1. -1
          28 January 2025 15: 51
          Quote: hhurik
          Judging by the video, it's a cuckoo clock. It won't fly. hi

          It will take off. But not with the gross manpower of the early 40s, when even in the tank units of the KOVO 2/3 of the privates and 1/3 of the junior commanders had basic education or none at all. The infantry could not even properly clean a weapon, let alone adjust a gas regulator (or teach their subordinates to do so).
          Literacy in the navy was, however, higher.
          1. -3
            28 January 2025 16: 39
            What does literacy have to do with it? The mandula, which moves in counter-motion - this rack with a bunch of gears - how to put it mildly, raises doubts about the successful implementation of the plan. Well, yes, they reduced the weight of the bolt and, like, when braking, it does not hit the butt plate and the stump of the barrel with all its might - the vibrations of the weapon have decreased. There is probably an effect, definitely. The reliability of the system has decreased, no need to be a fortune teller. To what extent - who the hell knows.
            What will you choose at the end, well, when you are forced to - reliability tested by time and people, but with slightly worse indicators for a number of parameters, or all this with fashionable fluctuations, which no one in the world seems to have put into service?
            1. 0
              6 February 2025 11: 09
              Quote: hhurik
              What will you choose at the end, well, when you are forced to - reliability tested by time and people, but with slightly worse indicators for a number of parameters, or all this with fashionable fluctuations, which no one in the world seems to have put into service?

              The balanced automation mechanism has not been disassembled yet, the frame has simply been washed in kerosene with ultrasound after each exit.
              No complaints about reliability. ~4000 rounds fired.
              Firing single shots from a machine gun is not much different from the AK-74.
              The only thing is that the recoil is felt less, due to the weight.
              But when shooting with automatic fire, you immediately feel a much better ability to control the weapon and much less recoil and shaking.

              Given the choice between the AK-12 and the A-545, most preferences go to the latter.
              1. 0
                6 February 2025 12: 52
                It must be cool to carry a canister of kerosene and a container for soaking, an ultrasonic bath with washing liquid and also a generator to power this bath.
                All you need to do is clean the gun. drinks A pack animal should definitely be included in the A-545 kit.
                1. 0
                  6 February 2025 15: 50
                  Quote: hhurik
                  It must be cool to carry a canister of kerosene and a container for soaking, an ultrasonic bath with washing liquid and also a generator to power this bath.

                  Firstly, cleaning is not required as often as with the AK-12.
                  Secondly, given how military actions have changed now, imagine that a generator is a very necessary thing, to charge drones and Mavics.
                  The same kerosene can be obtained in abundance from tankers on the T-80.
                  Well, for education, look at the analysis of the AK-12, there are many small details that a fighter can miss in comparison with the A-545.
                  It is also used by airborne forces and issued to distinguished soldiers.
                  The main problem with this machine gun is its small number in the troops and the lack of equipment for it.
                  Why you wrote such a stupid comment, I don’t know, but okay, let’s leave it for other readers to enjoy.
                  1. 0
                    6 February 2025 16: 12
                    Stupid, probably - that's why I write such comments. I can't compare to you, a giant of thought. wassat

                    What in the world, citizen giant, is this analog-piece of shit device used by someone somewhere in practice, from decent military organizations, with a good budget? Or does no one need it, even for fun? And this is an indicator - after all, it's the 21st century, Elon's aluminum ships are furrowing the expanses, you can cut out any crap from any material on CNC machines - and no one needs it. What a disaster.
    3. +1
      28 January 2025 13: 28
      I held the AN94 in my hands and shot it. I wasn't impressed: the diopter sight, fire selector and folded buttstock evoked emotions far from the simple satisfaction of interacting with a new system. And disassembly and assembly were quite a quest. I didn't like it, although it was comfortable to hold with the buttstock folded.
    4. +1
      28 January 2025 20: 18
      The AN94 assault rifle was unlucky, it was adopted for service in the late 80s, everything collapsed. The design should have been established during this period, but this did not happen, the 90s came. It was necessary to improve this design and change the AK.
  11. -8
    28 January 2025 13: 37
    Greetings to all gunsmiths.
    In my opinion, such a machine is not needed.
    It has no significant advantages over AK.
    It is significantly more complicated, and logically, more expensive.
    It requires high technical and mechanical skills in handling.
    Difficult to learn.
    Why 545 if the AK with body kit is practically equivalent.
    Give an order to the Kovrov plant?
    Let them develop a proven scheme (for example, an arch). Patriots may not start their balalaika.
    The hybrid of the Ark and the Kalashnikov is a cool theme.
    Or refine the existing scheme, but my opinion is that nothing good will come of it without a radical rethinking.
    1. -2
      28 January 2025 14: 24
      Regarding balance, if we talk about machines and mechanisms in general, then the balance of dynamic inertial forces is achieved by using symmetrical designs, say 3 or 4 cylinder in-line engines are an example of symmetry, but say 1 or 2 cylinder engines are not and therefore they cannot be considered well balanced. If we want to have a balanced machine, then we need to create symmetrical mechanics for its moving parts, at least instead of one gas piston on top, use two on the sides, and all sorts of hassles with toothed racks cannot give the effect of symmetrical mechanics.
      1. 0
        30 January 2025 12: 11
        3 4 piston twins are also not balanced. Only 6 cylinder in-line is balanced.
    2. +6
      28 January 2025 15: 45
      Quote: 26_Sergey_26
      In my opinion, such a machine is not needed.

      My IMHO your opinion is even more unnecessary.
      Quote: 26_Sergey_26
      It has no significant advantages over AK.

      But does it matter? And is it important to someone?
      Quote: 26_Sergey_26
      It is significantly more complicated, and logically, more expensive.

      How much more significant and expensive? Can I have numbers instead of exercises in literature?
      Quote: 26_Sergey_26
      It requires high technical and mechanical skills in handling.

      Every phrase is a pearl... What mechanical skills does it require? Bench press 120 kg? And what technical skills are these? A 7th-category turner or a candidate of technical sciences?
      Quote: 26_Sergey_26
      Difficult to learn.

      I'm already scared. Is it so complicated that it's easier to train a tanker or an S-400 operator? Or does someone just need to throw it at a competitor?
      Quote: 26_Sergey_26
      Why 545 if the AK with body kit is practically equivalent.

      Well, why AK if 545 is practically equivalent, but has advantages?
      Quote: 26_Sergey_26
      Give an order to the Kovrov plant?

      Well, not everything in one go to Kalashnikov? Isn't that too much?
      Quote: 26_Sergey_26
      Let them develop a proven scheme (for example, an arch). Patriots may not start their balalaika.

      And then why would you go to Ark again when you have AK)))
      Quote: 26_Sergey_26
      Or refine the existing scheme, but my opinion is that nothing good will come of it without a radical rethinking.

      As practice has shown, if you have only one manufacturer, then at one fine moment you can be left without a machine gun, because with the AK-12 they managed to screw up so many things that it is unclear how they are going to make anything worthwhile in the future.
      1. -8
        28 January 2025 17: 23
        I recommend you watch the video reviews of the Kovrov machine gun. There is one worthwhile review in the net.
        Despite all the advantages of this machine, it has many more disadvantages.
        I am not trying to belittle the work of the Kovrov gunsmiths. They produce many other quality products.
        But they lost competitions with their machine guns even during the Soviet Union.
        Or do you want to challenge the results of the weapons competitions of those times?
        1. 0
          28 January 2025 19: 19
          Quote: 26_Sergey_26
          I recommend you watch the video reviews of the Kovrov machine gun. There is one worthwhile review in the net.

          I looked. A normal machine gun for its niche, and not as a general-purpose weapon.
          Quote: 26_Sergey_26
          Despite all the advantages of this machine, it has many more disadvantages.

          Again, more or less)) It has its disadvantages, like any machine, but they do not outweigh the advantages, otherwise the machine would not have passed all the tests and would not have been accepted.
          Quote: 26_Sergey_26
          But they lost competitions with their machine guns even during the Soviet Union.

          Well... a very questionable argument, especially since the machine gun got better over time. But Kalashnikov has tarnished his reputation very badly. Just look at the "falling" safety catch on the AK-12.
          Quote: 26_Sergey_26
          Or do you want to challenge the results of the weapons competitions of those times?

          G-logic. What does the 545th have to do with what came before it? Are we talking about a specific product or the history of the entire enterprise as a whole? Let's then talk about the total shit-job during the development of the AK-12, at what attempt was it possible to "improve" the AK-74 so that it could at least be put into production. And it was "improved" so much that the improvements had to be redone almost completely and are still being redone... AK-12 into AK-15 into AK-19... and it looks like we won't see the final version for a long time.
          1. -4
            28 January 2025 20: 20
            It's nice that you parse my thoughts into quotes. Sorry for the grammatical errors (T9).
            But, I will give several examples of special weapons from the official press: Vintorez, Vityaz, Gyurza, Vykhlop and a bunch of other things. At the same time, the AK remains the main type even for specialists in any case.
            But they have neither AEK nor 545 in constant supply.
            Yes, they test them, like a bunch of other weapons.
            Yes, in some conditions they have advantages.
            At the same time, I assure you that today there is a niche where the Mossin rifle will be good.
            But based on the totality of parameters, a simple, reliable type of weapon will win, because the characteristics of the weapon are determined by the CARTRIDGE.
            America can afford to have three machine guns of the same caliber, with similar characteristics, but not Russia.
            And there really are many questions about the Kalashnikov assault rifle in its current concept and with its current build quality and current price. But they should be asked by the competent authorities.
            1. 0
              29 January 2025 22: 42
              Quote: 26_Sergey_26
              But, I will give several examples of special weapons from the official press: Vintorez, Vityaz, Gyurza, Vykhlop and a bunch of other things. At the same time, the AK remains the main type even for specialists in any case.

              These are very special samples, but what to do when it is necessary to provide higher characteristics, but not for the anti-terrorist groups of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, but for military units? This is where the 545th comes into play
              Quote: 26_Sergey_26
              At the same time, I assure you that today there is a niche where the Mossin rifle will be good.

              If it is found, then unfortunately it will be an indicator that this direction has been completely missed.
              Quote: 26_Sergey_26
              But based on the totality of parameters, a simple, reliable type of weapon will win, because the characteristics of the weapon are determined by the CARTRIDGE.

              Nope)) SYSTEM cartridge-weapon. because if something from this system is obvious crap, then the whole system is inoperative.
              Quote: 26_Sergey_26
              America can afford to have three machine guns of the same caliber, with similar characteristics, but not Russia.

              The machine gun can do just that, its price is a pittance compared to what is spent on producing cartridges.
              Quote: 26_Sergey_26
              And there really are many questions about the Kalashnikov assault rifle in its current concept and with its current build quality and current price.

              Yeah, and no one has cancelled the principle of not putting all your eggs in one basket. It's better to have a backup option than to be left with nothing if, God forbid, the same Kalashnikov factory gets damaged or the effective ones from there are modernized to the point where it's easier to throw them out than to remake them.
          2. VlK
            0
            29 January 2025 14: 17
            Quote: Dmitry Zdhanovich
            Quote: 26_Sergey_26
            I recommend you watch the video reviews of the Kovrov machine gun. There is one worthwhile review in the net.

            I looked. A normal machine gun for its niche, and not as a general-purpose weapon.

            Why not a combined arms weapon if it passed all the tests before being accepted into service? Is it really that much more expensive than the rest of the equipment of a modern soldier, or is the level of literacy of privates now the same as before the Great Patriotic War? It reminds one of saving on matches, if this is not related to operational qualities, and if it is related, then how can one arm the army's elite with it?
    3. 0
      28 January 2025 21: 47
      What prevents this plant from producing the same AK-12 or Pechenegs? Licensing agreements?
  12. 0
    28 January 2025 16: 52
    Concert "K" simply crushed the possibility of adopting the AEK-97 and A-545. Recommended for special forces. And almost nothing is heard about it.
  13. -10
    28 January 2025 17: 05
    What's the point of this machine gun if it's still the same stick-shooter from the end of the 20th century?
    How far has it come from the 19th century Fedorov machine gun?
    Where is the thermal imager, where is the ballistic computer with the option of target acquisition and tracking, where is the target hazard analyzer?
    I have seen so many videos from the enemy, how they walk in full gear under automatic fire from our soldiers, because they know perfectly well that a Russian soldier cannot hit a full-length figure from 20 meters!
    1. 0
      28 January 2025 18: 08
      I'll hit you with a pickled gherkin from 22,3 meters with a slingshot, you can even jump with a saucepan as per tradition. Come to your senses hi
      1. -4
        28 January 2025 21: 42
        Well, if you spent 20 years shooting cornucopias from a slingshot, then I wouldn't be surprised, but 95% of those who came to the SVO either never held a machine gun in their hands, or had experience shooting 15 rounds in the army during a year or two of service and will never become shooting masters out of them
        1. +1
          29 January 2025 11: 32
          To prepare a shooter, from experience, 3 days of more or less intensive training are enough. If the individual fails, he is sent to the wagon train, to the eternal kitchen duty.
    2. 0
      30 January 2025 21: 36
      Yuriy Filatov Yeah, that's a cool statement. You wouldn't want to get hit by fire. Even from 20 or 200 meters. wink
  14. 0
    28 January 2025 19: 17
    The article has everything, only what is missing is what is promised in the title. How the machine showed itself in the SVO. An absolutely meaningless article.
  15. -1
    28 January 2025 21: 17
    something original in our troops in terms of weapons began to appear, the question is why, so many varieties of assault rifles, machine guns, pistols - why in the USSR Armed Forces was there an AK assault rifle, in principle caliber, 7,62 and 5,45, a sniper rifle SVD, pistols PM, Stechkin pistol, machine guns RPK, PK, large-caliber Utes, for specialists Val, Vul, silent pistols, several modifications, for submariners their own weapons. That's it, why so many weapon systems.
    1. -1
      28 January 2025 21: 43
      factories need to work... The funniest thing is that our troops flatly refuse the modular design of the same machine gun, when by replacing the barrel you can get a marksman rifle or an assault rifle
  16. Jan
    +2
    28 January 2025 22: 14
    Ha, pennies for fish again... How long can you ride a long-rotten pig (a German proverb, by the way)??!!! The AEK was not bad for its time, more than 30 years have passed and our cart is still standing on the original... The fact that our lampasniks (MoD) are too lazy to puzzle over something new is not news! We still use the rimmed 7,62x54R cartridge, so talking about mass armament of "badass": expensive, not timely, etc. etc.! They are not the ones who will go into battle with these crafts called AK-12. Soldiers do not buy body kits for AK with their own hard-earned money because of trends: with it, the chances of survival are higher! The fact that the AN required revision was clear 20 years ago! But the machine was innovative, roughly speaking "ahead of the rest of the world". It did not work out and now we have what we have! But what really pisses me off is what all these gunsmiths and khmiks are doing: no new systems, no new propellants, nothing! They even buried the caseless one! In general, they don't give a damn and they (the gunsmiths) are not going to fuss.
  17. 0
    29 January 2025 21: 45
    It is not suitable as an army assault rifle - too difficult to disassemble and clean and has many moving parts, although it is much better than the Abakan in this regard. For special forces, even more so for urban ones - perhaps. But are its advantages over the AK so great?
    Honestly, I would like to finally see a break-action AK like the SIG.
    1. 0
      6 February 2025 10: 22
      It is not suitable as an army machine gun - it is too difficult to disassemble and clean and has many moving parts,

      In terms of the number of small parts that a recruit can sow compared to the AK-12, the Kord A-545 assault rifle is simpler.
      Partial disassembly is no more difficult than AK-12.
      It is used by airborne forces units and given out to distinguished soldiers.
      The main problem with this machine gun is its small number in the troops.
      1. 0
        6 February 2025 16: 38
        I saw it disassembled. The AK is easier to operate and more reliable, there is no moving balancer that gets dirty, etc.
        Even from the buttstock it is clear that this is more of a machine gun for special services like VAL and will most likely require the same careful maintenance.
        1. 0
          6 February 2025 20: 46
          Quote: Totor5
          I saw him disassemble it.

          Below is the fighters' feedback.
          The balanced automation mechanism has not been disassembled yet, the frame has simply been washed in kerosene with ultrasound after each exit.
          No complaints about reliability. ~4000 rounds fired.
          Second, if you were older and were allowed to go to a gun show, you wouldn't write nonsense. The balancer has a lot of gaps and a large pitch of gear teeth, it can only be jammed by large and coarse debris, which in principle cannot get there, and it doesn't care about fine dirt and sand.
          And judging from the feedback from the fighters.
          Given the choice between the AK-12 and the A-545, most preferences go to the latter. (It is also used in the Airborne Forces)
          Even at first, many people abandoned the AK-12 in favor of the old AK-74.
          1. 0
            7 February 2025 02: 28
            There is no talk about AK12 at all. And in fact - without tests and tables no one can say anything about anything in general. And who has seen them?
            Everyone knows the Ak and they know why it is reliable - simplicity and gaps. But here the design is many times more complex and obviously more expensive, does it make sense in a conscription army - a BIG question.
            1. 0
              7 February 2025 09: 14
              Quote: Totor5
              But in fact - without tests and tables no one can say anything about anything in the complex. And who saw them?

              The machine gun actually passed military tests and won the competition, but the Kalashnikov lobby pushed through its own machine gun, which, as we all know, did not perform very well.
              And if you want to see how the 6P67 (AEK-971) is being tested, please, the Zvezda TV channel has a story about this machine gun on the You Know What Ura program, where you can see how it is frozen, filled with sand, etc. At the factory, this machine gun is assembled by girls, and here it is suddenly complicated for male recruits, isn't it funny to you?
              Well, the design is not many times more complicated than the same AK, the only difference is in the gas mechanism and the price, and everything else is very similar to the AK (larva, trigger, etc.)
              I found a video about the downsides: it shoots powder gases into the right eye, the trigger guard is too wide, there are not enough overhangs, and that's basically it.
              1. 0
                7 February 2025 18: 30
                In the AK, you press the button, open the lid and it's ready. But here there are still a bunch of small parts and pulling out. The AK is simpler - there's no point in arguing with that.
                I haven't seen any tests of this Kord for endurance or failures. But I don't think this design can be more reliable than the Kalash.
                If he goes in series to the Airborne Forces and other FSB, then it will be clear what he represents in reality.
                1. 0
                  8 February 2025 11: 05
                  Quote: Totor5
                  I pressed the button in Ak, opened the lid and it was ready.

                  It's the same here. Incomplete disassembly occurs in three movements.
                2. 0
                  8 February 2025 11: 14
                  Quote: Totor5
                  If he goes in series to the Airborne Forces and other FSB, then it will be clear what he represents in reality.

                  It won't work, Kalashnikov's lobby won't let him.
                  1. 0
                    8 February 2025 19: 20
                    Kalashnikov also has a machine gun with a balancer and they wrote that the advantages there are not very significant, but there are more problems.
  18. +1
    29 January 2025 23: 05
    Good accuracy when firing in bursts should be a good help in defense against drones. There are plenty of videos where drones are shot from an AK. Nowadays, this is more than relevant. A rifle would be better, of course, but you have to carry it and it is not always at hand.
    1. +1
      30 January 2025 15: 04
      They showed shotgun shells for AK. True, here a larger caliber is clearly better than a small-bore one.
      1. 0
        30 January 2025 16: 34
        There is no need to bother with changing the store here.
        And the Ministry of Defense hasn't ordered the production of those shotgun shells yet. It seems like the plastic will ruin the barrel.
        1. +1
          30 January 2025 19: 22
          It's better than carrying a shotgun. And the accuracy is not so important for shooting down an air target - the spread of the cloud is more important, because you are not shooting at the target, but in the direction of the target, which is moving.
  19. 0
    6 February 2025 10: 30
    © ️
    4. Feedback from soldiers on use in combat.

    Due to the small production volume, the A-545 is a fairly rare weapon in the Russian Armed Forces.
    Most of the machine guns are in service with the special forces units, and a small number are in service with the airborne forces.
    After writing an article about the AK-12, ***** contacted me and offered to tell about his experience using the A-545.
    The very first thing you understand when you take the A-545 in your hands is its... balance.
    The weight is well distributed and allows for very comfortable handling of the weapon.
    At the same time, the weight is greater than that of the AK, but thanks to the balance it is almost not felt.
    The handle and forend are very comfortable, do not rub your hands and are pleasant to the touch.
    The stock is comfortable and compact, but when folded, the rear sight is not visible.
    I am very pleased that the material on the buttstock allows you to not rest your cheek on bare metal.
    The sight is not much better than the similar one on the AK-12.
    Assembly and disassembly are unusual, it takes time to get used to it after the AK.
    The lack of a receiver cover made cleaning, especially in the lug areas, more difficult.
    The balanced automation mechanism has not been disassembled yet, the frame has simply been washed in kerosene with ultrasound after each exit.
    No complaints about reliability. ~4000 rounds fired.
    Firing single shots from a machine gun is not much different from the AK-74.
    The only thing is that the recoil is felt less, due to the weight.
    But when shooting with automatic fire, you immediately feel a much better ability to control the weapon and much less recoil and shaking.
    You can literally fire your entire magazine and not even knock your sights off the target, without really trying.
    Optics benefit greatly from reduced recoil, the sight is less likely to be knocked off target and allows you to calmly hold the target.
    Thanks to the one-piece platform, the optics do not need to be constantly removed, and the settings do not get lost.
    There is a nuance with stores.
    Standard magazines - no problem, but when using commercial options, especially large capacity ones, a problem with the magazine shaft arises.
    It is small, but it is there, it allows you to direct the magazine into the window a little more conveniently, but it does not allow you to attach magazines that are wider than the standard ones below the fixing tooth.
    Overall, the machine gun is excellent, the personnel are satisfied.
    Of course, people need to be taught how to use and maintain it, but the benefits are worth it.
    The problem is that there are few machines.
    5. Comparison of AK-12 and A-545
    Summarizing all the studied data, sources and communication with soldiers (many thanks to *****), compared to the A-545, the AK-12 has only its lighter weight and relative ease of maintenance in its exclusively positive characteristics.
    The A-545 is better than the old assault rifles in terms of shooting characteristics when firing automatically.
    The diopter sight is unfamiliar and inconvenient for most soldiers on both the A-545 and the AK-12.
    A small number of standard optical sights for machine guns.
    Demanding in terms of cleaning skills.
    Also negative is the tendency towards the impossibility of replacing non-essential parts (fore-end and grip) of the machine gun to meet the soldier’s requirements.
    The 2-shot firing mode did not live up to expectations and is a complication of the weapon's mechanism without much benefit.
    The A-545 has some nuances with fixing non-standard magazines.
    Given the choice between the AK-12 and the A-545, most preferences go to the latter.
    But there are clearly not enough machine guns in the troops, so the A-545 is very rare and is issued only to particularly distinguished fighters of special units.
    Also worth mentioning is the AK-107, the Izhevsk approach to a balanced automation system.
    Development began much later than the AEK-971, and although the automation is balanced, the principle of interaction of parts, in contrast to the A-545, is somewhat different.
    The AK-107 uses an inertial design with a long piston stroke and a balance beam; to synchronize speeds, the bolt carrier and balance beam are connected via toothed racks and a gear, the axis of which is fixed in the receiver.
    The military, unlike the A-545, did not accept the AK-107 into service due to doubts about the reliability of the machine gun, not to mention the overall lack of development and crudeness of the design.
    At the moment, the CC is not actively working on this machine.
    Compared to the AK-107, the A-545 is a proven solution without any teething troubles.
  20. 0
    7 February 2025 09: 15
    Quote: BAT-MENT
    That the An94 and AEK are better than the AK, it's high time to rearm the army with them. But this will never happen. For two reasons, the first is the administrative lobby of the AK,

    Is it okay that the AN94 is the brainchild of Izhmash, which is now part of KK?
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. 0
    10 February 2025 15: 36
    Quote: stankow
    3 4 piston twins are also not balanced. Only 6 cylinder in-line is balanced.

    The 6-cylinder opposed engine is also balanced (Subaru and Porsche knew something).
  23. 0
    16 February 2025 18: 50
    In my small and modest opinion, nothing better than the 10,67 mm Berdan No. 2 rifle has been invented yet :-)))) simple, single-shot, no need for magazines or clips, the trigger is very soft and therefore there is no need to train the shooter for each rifle like the Mosin system, the direct fire range is 420 meters, and no more is needed.... the bullet is lethal, if any of the enemies remain alive after being hit by the bullet, they will not get back on their feet for a long time :-))