The Baltic Fleet's Most Useful Trophy: U-250 Submarine

24 822 32
The Baltic Fleet's Most Useful Trophy: U-250 Submarine
The crew of the U-250 submarine on its deck, December 1944. Photo: German Bundesarchiv


During the Great Patriotic War, the Navy fleet The Red Army destroyed many German submarines. In 1944, one of the sunken submarines was raised to the surface, searched and thoroughly studied. Thanks to a complex and unique operation carried out by our military divers, the fleet received several valuable trophies and vital information.



A short career


In January 1943, a new Project VIIC diesel-electric submarine was laid down at a German shipyard. In November of the same year, it was launched, and on December 12, it was accepted into the Kriegsmarine under the tactical number U-250. Lieutenant Commander Werner-Karl Schmidt was appointed as the ship's commander.

At the end of July 1944, U-250 set out on its first and last combat mission. On July 30, the submarine was in the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland, not far from Vyborg. There, it attacked the Soviet small hunter MO-105 with a torpedo. The boat perished along with 20 sailors. Another 7 people were rescued.

Just a few hours later, the MO-103 sea hunter, commanded by Senior Lieutenant A.P. Kolenko, discovered the enemy submarine in a submerged position. In two passes over it, the boat dropped two series of five depth charges. The second attack was successful: one of the bombs damaged the pressure hull, and the submarine sank.

Six submariners who were at the central post were able to leave the boat and escape. Among them was the commander V.-K. Schmidt. Soviet sailors took them on board and took them prisoner. The remaining crew of the submarine perished. U-250 took the lives of 46 German sailors.


Five of the six rescued German submariners. In the center is the submarine commander V.-K. Schmidt. Photo Sovboat.ru

Valuable information


During the interrogation of the prisoners, it was established that important documents remained on board the submarine, such as a navigation log, maps of German mine laying, etc. In addition, the submarine carried various equipment and weapons of German manufacture, which were also of great interest.

The Commander-in-Chief of the Baltic Fleet, Admiral V. F. Tributs, ordered a search operation to locate the sunken submarine and retrieve the most valuable "cargo" from it. The operation was entrusted to the Special Purpose Company of the Baltic Fleet under the command of Captain 3rd Rank I. V. Prokhvatilov.

In early August, it was possible to pinpoint the location of the U-250 sinking and conduct a primary survey of the submarine. It was established that it was lying on the ground at a depth of about 35 m on an even keel with a slight list to starboard. The compartment with the diesel engines had a large hole, which was the cause of the sinking.

The dives to the target were carried out by military divers under the command of midshipman A. Burlak. Working in shifts, they studied the condition of the submarine and also searched it. The divers had to face a number of difficulties of various kinds. Working on a sunken submarine turned out to be difficult both physically and psychologically.

However, despite all the obstacles, the Special Purpose Company fighters were able to find and bring to the surface several important documents from the submarine's central post. In addition, they found many other interesting items and objects that also needed to be brought to the surface.


Commander of the Special Purpose Company I.V. Prokhvatilov, photo of the 1940s is ready. Photo Central Naval Museum

The activity of the Red Army Navy at the site of the submarine's demise attracted the attention of Finnish and German troops. artillery shelling, which made the work considerably more difficult. The German Navy also attempted to mine the area where U-250 was located in order to hinder the Special Operations Company, but this attempt was unsuccessful.

New task


Based on the results of the first works on the lost submarine, a new decision was made. The ship had to be raised to the surface and towed to a dry dock for a more thorough and detailed study. This task was assigned to the 76th emergency rescue squad, whose commander was engineer captain 2nd rank A. Kurdin.

According to the plan of the new operation, the divers of the 76th detachment were to install several pontoon tanks on the submarine. Then these tanks were supposed to be blown with compressed air, and they were supposed to lift the U-250 to the surface. In this form, the submarine could be towed in the desired direction and placed in a dry dock.

The manufacture of pontoons and necessary equipment, their delivery to the operation site and other preparatory activities took several days. Work on the submarine began in mid-August.

By this time, enemy activity in the area had increased. In connection with this, the Baltic Fleet took measures to strengthen the protection of working specialists. Counter-battery combat was organized using long-range artillery, combat boats were on duty at sea, etc.


U-250 in dry dock. Photo Sovboat.ru

The sailors and divers of the 76th detachment had to work in difficult conditions. In order to make reconnaissance and targeting more difficult for the enemy, the main work was carried out at night. In addition, it was necessary to take into account the strong wind and rough sea, which barely allowed the work to continue. However, despite all these difficulties, the divers successfully completed their task.

The installation of the pontoons on the submarine was completed on August 30. However, a strong storm soon began, which carried some of the structures out to sea. The search for the lost pontoons and their return to their place took several days. By this time, the situation had changed, and the divers' work became easier. The fact is that on September 4, Finland ceased military operations against the USSR, and the shelling ceased.

On September 13, divers completed the installation of the pontoons, and the submarine was raised to the surface the next day. On September 15, it was delivered to Kronstadt for installation in one of the dry docks. Immediately after this, the study of the captured ship began.

Special trophies


As expected, the sunken U-250 contained many interesting items and materials. Some of them were discovered and raised during the first stage of diving operations, while others were only recovered after the submarine was raised and delivered to the dock.

First of all, various maps and other navigational materials, communications documents, etc. were taken from the submarine. In addition, a virtually complete Enigma encryption machine was found on the U-250. The captured commander V.-K. Schmidt helped decipher the documents.


Submarine and one of the pontoons (in the foreground). Photo Sovboat.ru

The submarine had two unused G7es Zaunkönig torpedoes on board, equipped with an acoustic homing system. Soviet specialists were given access to this product for the first time and were able to study it. In addition, British colleagues were invited to familiarize themselves with the Zaunkönig products.

Finally, the submarine itself, built according to Project VIIC, was of certain interest to Soviet shipbuilders. Its design, units, armament, etc. were studied.

Positive effects


The operation to detect, search and raise the German submarine U-250 yielded important results. Thanks to it, it was possible to supplement knowledge about the enemy, solve a number of combat tasks and lay the foundation for further developments of various kinds. Moreover, some of the results of this operation were used by the allies.

The first results of the operation were already obtained in mid-August. A fairway leading from Swinemünde to Leningrad and passing between German minefields was discovered in the captured documents. Mines were laid along this route, and several German ships were blown up by them in mid-August. The enemy had to take urgent measures and clear the important fairway.

During the study of the captured submarine, they found a lot of solutions and ideas that could be used in their projects. In this regard, in January 1945, the Navy command ordered the suspension of the development of the diesel-electric submarine project "608". Later, on its basis, a new project 613 was completed, which took into account German experience and the results of the U-250 survey.


The stern of the submarine: a hole in the hull is visible. Photo Sovboat.ru

The raised submarine also had a significant impact on Soviet torpedo engineering. The G7es demonstrated how the acoustic homing problem could be solved, and with its help the first successful examples of such weapons were created. Similar work was also being carried out in Great Britain at the same time.

All the efforts and exploits of the sailors and divers also received a worthy assessment. Already on September 30, 1944, just a couple of weeks after the submarine was raised, Admiral V.F. Tributs signed an order to award the participants of the operation with state awards. In particular, six of the work managers were awarded the Order of the Red Banner.

In April 1945, the German submarine was included in the Baltic Fleet under the new number TS-14. It was planned to repair it and use it as a test vessel for testing various systems and products. However, the restoration of the ship was soon deemed inexpedient. On August 20, the submarine was written off and soon sent for scrapping.

Fights and trophies


The main task of the navy during war is to destroy enemy ships, submarines, vessels and coastal installations. However, in certain situations other actions may be required that are no less important. This was the case with the U-250 submarine.

The Baltic Fleet sailors managed to destroy another German submarine during its very first voyage. The submarine then became a source of valuable data of various kinds, which were used both immediately and in the long term. The Red Army Navy received a unique chance and was able to take full advantage of it.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    16 January 2025 06: 06
    In January 1943, a new Project VIIC diesel-electric submarine was laid down at a German shipyard. In November of the same year, it was launched, and on December 12, it was accepted into service.



    I am used to the fact that the works on VO are more detailed than other generally available resources, in connection with which I decided to clarify a number of points. The submarine was laid down on January 9, 1943 at the Germaniawerft shipyard (Kiel), launched on November 11, 1943.
  2. +16
    16 January 2025 06: 29
    During the Great Patriotic War, the Red Army Navy destroyed many German submarines.

    Quite a loud statement. Patriotism is a necessary thing, but against the truth...?
    The Red Army (not only the fleet) destroyed or irreparably damaged 17 German submarines and 3 Italian ones. Our losses from combat operations were 81 submarines.
    1. +8
      16 January 2025 08: 13
      Thus, the number of German submarines in Soviet waters was not comparable to their number in the waters of the “World Ocean”.
      Plus the extremely difficult conditions in the Far North - a huge theater of military operations and meager forces to fight even single Kriegsmarine submarines.
      1. +5
        16 January 2025 09: 20
        Alexey, good afternoon!
        I am not belittling the feat of Soviet sailors. The issue is different - the vague formulations in the above-posted work. A catchy "word" should always be in place.
        1. +4
          16 January 2025 10: 05
          Is 1 greater than 0?
          More.
          So "a lot"...
          That's why the author writes in such vague phrases.
          Anyone who wants to will check, others will simply believe.
      2. +3
        16 January 2025 11: 59
        Quote: hohol95
        Plus the extremely difficult conditions in the Far North - a huge theater of military operations and meager forces to combat even single submarines

        As for the meagerness of the funds - that's another question. By 1945, the Northern Fleet received many submarine hunters from both domestic industry and Lend-Lease. But at the same time, it could not provide anti-submarine warfare in the near zone of the GVMB - German submarines sank transports on the approaches to the Kola Bay. It was even necessary to ask the Allies for their anti-submarine group to clear the near zone.
        Or do you remember the KON PK-9? in April 1945? 2 TR were under the protection of 20 warships and boats (16 - Northern Fleet, 4 - Norwegian Navy), of which 14 were equipped with sonar, 6 along with the sonar had the Hedgehog MBU and 5 - the Maustrap RBU.
        Result? 1 TR sunk, 1 TR damaged, abandoned by the crew and towed to Kola Bay.
        1. +3
          16 January 2025 14: 47
          By 1945...
          And before 1945???
          We received it from our allies, but we probably haven’t mastered the operation of all the means of detecting and destroying enemy submarines 100%!
          It is possible that they had not mastered even 50% by the end of the war.
    2. +4
      16 January 2025 09: 18
      Mr. Kote Team, by the word "multitude" we mean hiding the exact numbers. We were also told about Khatyn that "the German occupiers destroyed it." Now, we are sorting it out... History is a sellout, politicians.
      1. +2
        16 January 2025 11: 14
        Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
        We were also told about Khatyn that "it was destroyed by the German occupiers." Now we are dealing with the mess.... History is a sellout, politicians.

        The lackeys of the German occupiers were destroyed.
        At this moment we are cleaning up the mess not because of the distortion and hushing up of history, but because of the failure to eliminate the very cause of this “phenomenon” – the spread of Bandera ideology in Ukraine.
      2. +1
        16 January 2025 13: 50
        Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
        Mr. Kote Team, by the word "multitude" we mean hiding the exact numbers. We were also told about Khatyn that "the German occupiers destroyed it." Now, we are sorting it out... History is a sellout, politicians.

        Good afternoon, Andrey Nikolaevich!
        Regarding the "concealment", I have several books and reference books on this topic in my library. Information on losses has changed from edition to edition over 60 years. Mainly due to the introduction of various studies and artifacts into scientific circulation (in the form of finding the places where submarines sank). Various approaches to assessing accidents and damage cause a lot of controversy. For example, the accidental hit of a Pe-2 with a bomb on a U9 in the port of Constanta. The U-boat was not a target, formally did not burn or sink - but later did not go to sea and was captured by our army. A number of submarines "disappeared without a trace", were later found and studied. The reasons for their deaths were established. Naturally, the statistics changed in one direction or another.
        There were other delights, for example, the Finns count one submarine lost by the Red Banner Baltic Fleet during the Soviet-Finnish War among their victories. We do not count it. It is difficult to estimate the submarines we left behind. Or the loss of the Leninets in the Pacific Ocean.
        If I am not mistaken, our total submarine losses are estimated at 116-125, while the Germans have almost 800.
        1. +2
          16 January 2025 13: 54
          Kote pane Kohanka, it's quite interesting... I haven't studied it so meticulously, but I accept any information with gratitude.
        2. 0
          18 February 2025 07: 13
          Yes, in general the list has been around for a long time...
      3. 0
        18 January 2025 21: 51
        Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
        We were also told about Khatyn that "it was destroyed by the German occupiers"

        These were Ukrainian nationalists under the leadership of German occupiers, what did this change?
  3. +5
    16 January 2025 09: 57
    The crew of the U-250 submarine on its deck, December 1944. Photo: German Bundesarchiv

    and on the photo itself the date is: 12.December 1943 - i.e. the photo was taken on the day the boat was accepted into the fleet.
    In general, the article turned out to be a highlight - in the photo of the surviving Germans, Commander Schmidt is wearing a cap and a long tunic, or whatever the navy calls it, and the question arises - how did he manage to get out of the sunken boat in such a state? You begin to speculate that the attributes of the uniform were obtained for him already in captivity, you imagine a possible style of communication with the captured commander, considering his cooperation in deciphering the documents.
    It is from such moments that the taste of the text consists, its attractiveness, when there is an opportunity to guess something, to imagine something more vividly. This is better than dry bouillon cubes-paragraphs in the author's usual style.
  4. +5
    16 January 2025 10: 30
    Pyotr Denisovich Grishchenko (one of the best officers of the submarine fleet), who headed the intelligence of the Baltic fleet at that time and personally "worked" with Captain Schmidt, described this episode in detail in his book "Underwater skirmishes". It is strange that the author of the article did not say a word about it.
  5. +1
    16 January 2025 11: 01
    I think?
    or indeed, but I recently read all this... here?
    or has this material already been posted somewhere?
    1. +2
      16 January 2025 12: 56
      You know that feeling, some kind of Deja Vu?
  6. -4
    16 January 2025 11: 20
    The submarine war in the Baltic in 1944-45 was a real triumph of the Soviet fleet. A victory with absolute superiority.
  7. +2
    16 January 2025 12: 30
    Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
    Quite a loud statement. Patriotism is a necessary thing, but against the truth...?
    The Red Army (not only the fleet) destroyed or irreparably damaged 17 German submarines and 3 Italian ones. Our losses from combat operations were 81 submarines.

    1. Or, more precisely, who should count the more than 300 German submarines that their crews sank in ports several days before the capitulation or captured in ports as a result of the capitulation of the 3rd Reich. In this capitulation, there is no merit of the Red Army? Even the Western allies counted the merit of the USSR as one third of the captured German and Italian fleet, and in my opinion, the merit of the Red Army in the capitulation of the Wehrmacht, including the Kriegsmarine, is no less than 2/3.
    2. Who will count the Romanian and Finnish submarines? Or does the capitulation of these countries have no significance?
    1. 0
      16 January 2025 13: 03
      There is no need to lump everything together: 300 German submarines, Romanian, Finnish, this is the result of successful actions of ground forces.
      1. 0
        16 January 2025 14: 52
        So, Soviet warships, boats and launches left in bases during the retreat do not count towards losses?
  8. 0
    16 January 2025 15: 54
    Quote: mr.ZinGer
    There is no need to lump everything together: 300 German submarines, Romanian, Finnish, this is the result of successful actions of ground forces.

    1. Of course, this is the result of successful actions of the ground forces and of course, the war was won mainly by the ground forces. The Kriegsmarine and Luftwaffe could have fought even to this day if the ground forces had not taken their bases and forced the Third Reich to capitulate unconditionally.
    But we must also see the participation of the Soviet fleet in the war on land. And in the defense of Leningrad and Stalingrad and then in the offensive against Germany.
    2. The war itself, its logic, throws everything, including losses, into one pile. War is not a sport game in different disciplines - separately war at sea, separately war in the air, separately on land. War is won by everyone together and they have one victory or defeat.
    1. -1
      16 January 2025 18: 24
      Your argument is that this is the average temperature in the hospital.
  9. +7
    16 January 2025 16: 22
    Just a few hours later, the sea hunter MO-103, under the command of Senior Lieutenant A.P. Kolenko, discovered the enemy submarine in an underwater position.

    The funniest thing is that the sinking of U-250 was made possible largely by the actions of Schmidt himself.
    First and foremost, he did not take into account possible countermeasures from the Baltic Fleet and did not change the area of ​​operations after the sinking of MO-105. On our ships, the upper watch began to look not only up and around, but also down.
    The second mistake was failure to take into account the hydrography of the area of ​​operations. In particular, the transparency of the water at shallow depths (where the submarine went after detecting MO-103, which had arrived in the area). As a result, when attempting to bypass MO-103 and go to greater depths, the submarine was visually detected underwater by the smoke screen boat KM-910, which immediately began to circle over the place where the submarine was detected, began to signal with a siren and rockets, and sent its partner, KM-103, to MO-908.
    The third mistake is the most obvious retreat course. The small hunter that arrived at KM-910 went from the smoke screen towards the nearest trench - and from 7 kbt spotted the submarine.
    Well, then it was a matter of technique: after the first series (2 BGB, 3 MGB) a bubble trail appeared on the water (damage to the high-pressure cylinders), the second series (4 BGB, 5 MGB) damaged the hull (fuel leak, air release). And then - the coup de grâce: the third series... although as a series - only one BGB, led to the flooding of the submarine's engine room, the boat lay on the ground.
  10. -1
    16 January 2025 17: 03
    Very interesting comments-additions, especially the last one, telling about the details of the sinking of the German submarine. The only question is why they shared the secrets of torpedoes with the British. It is clear that we were allies, but I do not think that they would have shared such technical information with us.
  11. -1
    16 January 2025 18: 03
    2 great operations! First they sank it, then raised it and took tactical information and technologies. It was powerful! And although the overall score for submarines was not in our favor, you will not forget the bright victories. The prisoners were of course incredibly lucky. I wonder how they surfaced from 35 meters?
    1. +1
      17 January 2025 08: 35
      Quote: Glagol1
      I wonder how they managed to float up from 35 meters?

      In an air bubble. A fairly common occurrence in the submarine fleet.
  12. 0
    16 January 2025 19: 03
    The funniest thing is that the sinking of U-250 was made possible largely by the actions of Schmidt himself.

    What's even funnier is that the Kriegsmarine command in 1944-45 abandoned its medium-sized boats with the crazy task of sinking boats in shallow water where there were more mines than water.
    The result is several lost boats in exchange for the sinking of two dozen boats and other small vessels, which are collectively cheaper than one of the submarines.
    The overall score in 1944-45 in the Baltic was a crushing victory for the Soviet submarine fleet. They lost only two boats and sank, in total, several tens of thousands of tons of ships, two destroyers and submarines, with torpedoes and mines.
  13. -2
    16 January 2025 20: 59
    Quote: Kostadinov
    Or, more precisely, whoever needs to count more than 300 German submarines that were sunk in ports by their crews several days before the capitulation or captured in ports as a result of the capitulation of the 3rd Reich.

    Thank you for your nice comment.
    The mistress is a typical anti-Soviet, comes to the comments to shit on the USSR and its achievements, a friend of Shpakovsky.
  14. +2
    16 January 2025 23: 03
    As for the many destroyed submarines, that's a bit too much. Neither in the Baltic Sea, nor in the Kara Sea, nor in the Black Sea, there were almost no German submarines. In the Black Sea, there were 9 "canoes" (IIB). The convoys to Murmansk were escorted by the British, and there were few VII series submarines from Narvik there. In the eastern Baltic, from 1941 to 1944, there were constantly about 5-7 units. The total number of confirmed victories of the Navy is ~10 units + 5-7 for unknown reasons. This does not detract from the merits of the USSR Navy, but there were a minimum of German submarines off the coast of the USSR.
  15. +1
    17 January 2025 12: 03
    Quote: Technician_Harlan
    Now about the many destroyed submarines, that's a bit too much. Not in the Baltic Sea, not in the Kara Sea, not in the Black Sea, there were almost no German submarines.

    I underestimated the destruction of German submarines at the end of World War II and as a result of the defeat of the Wehrmacht.
    On April 30, 1945, Doenitz orders Operation Regenbogen, which by May 4, 1945, results in the sinking of 238 German submarines (including only 5 that are finished but not yet afloat). This is only in the Baltic Sea. On May 4, Doenitz cancels the order and another 156 submarines capitulate along with the Wehrmacht. So the real number of German submarines lost for these two reasons alone is 394 or almost 400. These are mainly new type 21 and 23 series boats or older series that have undergone modernization - snorkels, acoustics, new torpedoes, etc.
    Without the capitulation of the Wehrmacht, in the summer and autumn of 1945, hard times came again for the fleets of the Western Allies.
  16. +1
    17 January 2025 20: 55
    "British colleagues were invited to get acquainted with the products of "Zaukonig." But they did not share. Although Enigma was deciphered back in 1940.