Putin’s Socialism - Glazyev vs Medvedev - Kudrin liberalism
The fall of macroeconomic indicators in January-February of the 2013 year in Russia is not just an alarming sign, but a long-awaited phenomenon that many economists have warned about in the past, 2012 year. The well-being of the Russian economy is entirely dependent on the European consumers of our energy resources, raw materials and products of the processing industries. But demand in Europe and the United States is steadily declining, and with it, industrial production, trade and freight transport are declining, as the freight has been falling for the last two years unequivocally. At the end of last year, the EU countries were forced to recognize the onset of a recession in the economy, and today voices are being heard about deflation, which will finally destroy the European economy. The reduction in money supply leads to the closure of small and medium-sized enterprises, to an even greater drop in demand. Europe today is experiencing a situation in Russia in the middle of the 90s of the last century, when enterprises were forced to switch to barter and pay their wages with products, as the economy was sorely lacking in money.
A way out of this crisis was proposed by the Primakov-Maslyukov group, but he categorically did not suit the American side, which was striving to completely ruin the Russian enterprises, which even the August-planned default of 1998 did not go ahead. But only the rise in oil prices and the change in the Kremlin’s policy with the advent of Vladimir Putin, the decrease in dependence on external control, made it possible to preserve small fragments of former greatness. Who collapses the European economy, actively curtailing its industrial production, who, through falling European demand, is trying to destroy the recent Dolce Vita in major Russian cities, just ten years ago, completely different from European cities? There are objective processes that make the current crisis irreversible, but there are also subjective processes that are trying to make economic problems political. Behind all these actions, of course, are the financial authorities, which have long ago become a closed elite club.
On the one hand, nothing can be done with the demand crisis until the fall in demand and living standards stabilizes at a certain level, from which it will be possible to begin a slow rise. On the other hand, politics is always a reflection of the economy, and today the old political formation is breaking down and a new time arises for the formation of completely different political, economic and social relations. However, all occurring tectonic shifts easily fit into Stephen Mann's chaos theory, where it is much easier to control a system that is in chaos, since any system (state, society, person) is self-organizing, that is, a period of chaos is surely replaced by a period of sustainability and peaceful development. The current period of the capitalist development of the world has entered a period of chaos in the imbalance of the entire economic system and, as a result, of political relations. But after reaching a certain level, chaos will be replaced by stability, countries (societies) will stabilize themselves and the question arises: what kind of system will it be, what economic - political relations will come in the changed world?
Not only the Western elites are concerned about this issue, but these disturbing thoughts do not allow the Kremlin’s Russian inhabitants to sleep well. The entire 2012 year passed under the auspices of the “marsh revolution”, which died safely on the eve of 2013, and failed to gain weight among the Russian people. Why? Relative calm and well-being makes the revolutionary struggle a funny circus of the marginals. Moreover, the “swamp revolutionaries” did not carry within themselves a political idea capable of putting millions under their banners. The march of millions of 1991 of the year was an event, a breath of clean air in the stench of the rotten policy of the Central Committee of the CPSU, unable to give the people what they wanted. And the leaders of the future Gorbachev revolution of August 1991 of the year gave what the people wanted - life without the CPSU Central Committee, without eternal “we approve of the policies of the party and government”. They gave pluralism of opinions, freedom of trade and movement, but they took away the state and all the national wealth. But who thought about this when the spring winds of the revolution pleasantly stupefy the head with wine of “freedom, equality and fraternity”!
What needs to be given today, what idea will bring millions of Russian people under the new banner who want to breathe in the intoxicating vernal air of the revolution again? The national revival of Russia and an independent economy, the absence of external pressure and social justice. That is, social democracy and sovereignty of Russia. It was these banners, when no one was waiting, put up in the windows of the Kremlin, it was under these banners that V.Putin went to the third presidential term, completely demoralizing the “swamp revolutionaries”. Starting from the case of A. Serdyukov and the fight against corruption, the national liberation movement will inevitably come to the nationalization of the Central Bank and the bowels of our state, and repression, according to economist M. Khazin, once started, will no longer be able to stop, because one criminal case is inevitable creates another, because all the officials are bound by circular bail. But the economy, inseparable from repressions against corrupt officials, always and everywhere sets the main sound, under which the entire chorus of the "oprichniki" who joined the fight against the American heritage in Russia adapts. And a key figure, V. Putin’s tuning fork in the economic sphere, S.Yu. Glazyev, Doctor of Economics, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, January 29, 2013, prepared a report to the President “On goals, problems and measures of state development and integration policy”, in which it proposes to carry out the following steps:
All of these points indicate a steady desire to create a sovereign economic system with a social democratic face, the nationalization of strategic industries and the gradual abandonment of imported products (import substitution). Rather strong and well thought-out program of the Putin-Glazyev tandem, aimed at the benefit of Russia, some of the points of which were the color of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation for many years. But this program kills on the spot all American liberalism in Russia, makes insignificant everything that they have produced in the last 20 years, and their criminals themselves. What kind of howling in the liberal camp of agents of foreign influence in our country, which only epithets did not receive the competent and talented economist S.Yu. Glazyev! In an interview with the Free Press 2 in March 2013 of the year S.Kara - Murza, chief researcher at ISPI RAS, said:
Abstracts of the group of Sergei Glazyev are built as if Putin began a deep reform of the entire economy. But is that so? And then experts give advice on how to correct economic policy, as if the government does not understand what to do. And this is strange. There are no forces behind Glazyev, no social bases that would force the government to listen to its recommendations. And to whom he refers in society? Unclear. In addition to Putin, he does not address his theses as if to anyone. It turns out just a manifesto that will stir up the intellectual environment, which will be read by young people, students. This manifesto touches upon the main contradiction of our society, which objectively exists between the so-called new owners, who obtained their wealth through previous privatizations of factories and other assets, and between the majority of the population. The situation can only be changed by giving political will to the population, because people themselves cannot organize.
So who is against changing the situation of the opposition of the Cabinet of Ministers, Dmitry A. Medvedev and his pro-American oligarchs, and President Vladimir Putin, who is trying to overcome the influence of the United States on the new vector of Russia's development - sovereign? The economic situation in the program of S.Yu. Glazyev must be supported by appropriate political decisions and supported by the people against whom not a single “fifth column” of American influence can stand. To do this, you need to create your own political party, aimed at revolutionary changes in Russia, that is, the All-Russian Popular Front, and give it weight in the eyes of the people of our country. How to do it? Tell the truth, explain all the lies of liberal government in our country, boldly show agents of American influence in state structures, business, the media, and carry out reprisals against corrupt officials. Then the credibility of the Russian people will be limitless, and with its help you can solve any problem, even to overcome the colonization of the United States by Russia.
One of the main apologists of liberalism in Russia, former Finance Minister A. Kudrin, in an interview with the Kurs program 7 in March 2013, said:
Now, for example, in Russia we often say, let's weaken the monetary policy, we will give more money, we will give money at low rates. Now expanding money, and even in the face of the danger of rising inflation and growth rates around 3-3,5%, is wrong. That is why we should not today neither gold reserves be thrown into the market for sale, nor the ruble mass be increased. We have stimulated demand, above all, the population. But at the moment the demand of the population has rested on the possibility of wages and the high cost of debt on loans to individuals. We have exhausted serious opportunities for the growth of household loans. That is why we cannot break the budget rule today, we should not weaken it. I know the opinion of investors who believe that this rule should be in this form.
More than a remarkable admission: “I know the opinions of investors who believe that ...” Great! Some investors, most likely members of the Tripartite Commission or the Council on Foreign Relations, created by the Rothschilds-Rockefellers, do not recommend that the Russian authorities themselves determine the amount of money needed in the economy. With a decrease in GDP growth, which is natural in the context of falling demand and deflation (stable prices for raw materials), the amount of money external management of Russia will also decrease, forcing the last of the remaining remaining strategic enterprises of our country to close. Or it is better to privatize what Prime Minister Dmitry A.Medvedev does, directing the proceeds not even to the budget, but to the purchase of foreign debt bonds and the state order to privatized enterprises. Beautiful combination, nothing to say! Who is watching the execution of these incredible for their criminal audacity economic sabotage? Agents of American influence in the ruling elite of Russia, including the allegedly disgraced A. Kudrin and no less odious A. Chubais!
Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, during his tour of Latin American countries, gave an interview to Cuban media 23 February 2013, where, in particular, he said:
But if you ask me if the financial world order is fair today, I will say no to you. It requires the continuation of systematic work and it must be led by all states, not only those represented in the G8 or G20. We are ready to continue to cooperate with Cuba, with our friends in Latin America, with all states in the matter of establishing a more modern and fair financial order in the world.
I will not hide, and I, and I am sure, my colleague Vladimir Putin is comfortable enough to communicate with the US administration, but there are topics on which our positions diverge very seriously. One of them is the issue of armaments. We had different periods in the relationship, I must admit that in general in recent years our relations have developed rather not badly, because we managed to prepare and sign very important documents, our American colleagues contributed to our accession to the WTO.
What is this “fair financial order in the world” because of which, in contrast to Vladimir Putin, Medvedev, “to communicate comfortably with the US administration”? And this is the above-considered idea of establishing a new world order, the transition to other economic and political relations, which are based on a reduction in the money supply, randomizing the population to overthrow the current political elites and the formation of new authorities following the changed economic conditions. For this, Russia during the presidency of Dmitry A. Medvedev, with the help of “American colleagues”, joined the WTO, becoming another cog in the TNC system, where there are no sovereign governments, no national interests, but there is a thirst for money and the world power of financiers sitting at another round table, the next Masonic order. Dmitry Medvedev's astounding revelation about the help of “American colleagues” testifies not only to the betrayal of the interests of the Russian people and Russia, but also to the recognition of external control in our country, whose leadership is located not in the Kremlin, but on Capitol Hill and in the Masonic orders USA and Europe, whose priests are trying to influence the policies of all countries of the world.
A reduction in budget revenues in Russia, if it is impossible to use gold reserves and other savings invested in US and EU debt bonds, as well as a reduction in the money supply, will in the very near future lead to a sharp drop in the incomes of our country's citizens. And that means to the chaos, when people who are deprived of work will try to get it in any amount, breaking into numerous street appearances and searches for the guilty. This instability is extremely beneficial to the United States and the European Union, as in conditions of chaos, you can not only change the economic model in Russia, but also the political one by canceling the institute of presidency, selling off the remnants of state property, throwing off the poverty line tens of millions of people ready to execute any order for little money and food. In which new conditions does the state self-organize again, restoring stability? In the face of the loss of part of the territory and in a greatly weakened form. This is exactly what the creators of the New World Order need!
What to oppose them, how to act in conditions of increasing chaos? Only by creating a nationally-oriented state, daily strengthening state power, expanding anti-corruption repression, while relying on the broad sections of the population supporting the sovereign policy of the Kremlin. Instead of a march of millions, basically smashing legitimate power, it is necessary to bring people to the square under the banner of the struggle against liberalism, against American influence in Russia, for the creation of national power and social justice. The chaos of street revolt, skillfully inflamed by American political technologists, must be fought with widespread involvement of the masses in protest demonstrations demanding order in Russia, the formation of a government of national trust, the nationalization of the monetary system and strategic enterprises, and the creation of state monopolies with firm pricing. All this is impossible without the firm will of V.Putin - the leader of the national liberation revolution, without political support of ONF - the mouthpiece of sovereign politics in Russia.
Information