Military Review

US Navy presented a plan for its development

27

US Navy Unveils 5-Year Naval Shipbuilding Plan Adjusted for Development Program fleet.


These data are presented in a new report by the Congressional Research Service.

In January 2013, the Navy submitted to Congress a plan for bringing the fleet numbers up to the 306 ships specifying their types and numbers.

According to the 5-year shipbuilding plan in 2013-2017 f.yy. Funding requested for 41 ship instead of previously planned 57 ships (28 percent. Reduced 16 units).

According to the plans of the US military shipbuilding in 2013-2017 f.yy. In the near 5 anniversary, the following ships will be built and delivered to the fleet: one heavy nuclear aircraft carrier (AVT) Gerald Ford (CVN-78), 9 nuclear submarines with missile-torpedo armament (PLAT) of the Virginia type (SSN-774 ), 9 destroyers of the type “Arly Burke (DDG-51), 16 coastal warships such as LCS (Littoral Combat Ship), one universal landing ship (UDC)“ America ”LHA-6, 2 tug, one landing platform MLP (Mobile Landing Platform), one high-speed transport catamaran JHSV (Joint High Speed ​​Vessel), one tanker. In total, the ship will be handed over to the 41 fleet, including in FN 2013. - 10 units, in 2014 f.d. -7 units, in 2015 f.d. - 8 units, in 2016 FG - 9 units, in 2017 FG - 7 units

On average, the US Navy will receive annually from the shipbuilding industry over the next 5 anniversary of the 8,2 combat ships, whereas earlier fleet development plans provided for transferring to the fleet annually on 10 and more combat ships.

The rate of replacement of the ship composition for the fleet numbering 306 ships with an average duration of operation in 35 years will be 8,7 ship annually.

In the future, shipbuilding and related programs will experience new financial difficulties due to lack of funding and possible sequestering of the defense budget, which will affect priority programs such as the construction of the nuclear aircraft carrier CVN-78, the construction of the nuclear aircraft carrier loading complex, and the destroyers program. DDW-type DDG-51, and a program for the construction of landing ships, funded in previous years.
Originator:
http://vpk-news.ru
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. evgenii67
    evgenii67 22 March 2013 10: 28 New
    12
    Hello everyone! Despite the alleged reduction in military spending, the pace is impressive, I wish the American comrades a lot of marriage, constant postponements, well, the classic cut of budget funds am
    1. Arberes
      Arberes 22 March 2013 10: 40 New
      +4
      Quote: evgenii67
      Well, the classic budget cut

      I appreciated!
      You plus Friend
      And the Anglo-Saxons
      Serdyukov’s drinks

      PS
      Together with the Babskii battalion, of course.
      1. evgenii67
        evgenii67 22 March 2013 10: 50 New
        +1
        Quote: Arberes
        Serdyukov’s

        it would be great if the United States began to buy serious weapons abroad hi For example, I would not mind that the MiG-29 (without any frills) be sold to America (so to speak, replacing the F-16 and, accordingly, instead of the F-35), otherwise it’s a kind of stagnation with the MiGs, it’s breaking the soul, and the enterprise works , and the F-35 would go down in history without becoming a replacement for the legendary F-16 laughing Apaches to hell, let our Mi-35 take fellow here such Serdyukovs need to go to the States and it’s good for them and it will turn out cheaper and better soldier
        1. Arberes
          Arberes 22 March 2013 11: 25 New
          +2
          evgenii67 Hello again hi
          Do you know what unites us?

          Rich fantasy!
          1. evgenii67
            evgenii67 22 March 2013 11: 32 New
            0
            Quote: Arberes
            Do you know what unites us?

            Rich fantasy!

            Apparently yes, but much more, for example: we live in one country, we love our Motherland ...... drinks
            1. Arberes
              Arberes 22 March 2013 11: 50 New
              +4
              Quote: evgenii67
              we love our homeland .....

              And the Navy !!! drinks
    2. ShturmKGB
      ShturmKGB 22 March 2013 10: 55 New
      +4
      While the fat dries, the thin dies ...
    3. Zic
      Zic 22 March 2013 17: 51 New
      -7
      Well, what about * shiver trembling with fear? laughing
    4. ixsus
      ixsus 22 March 2013 21: 35 New
      +1
      Greetings evgenii67
      I also support it, otherwise they speak of corruption, even if they also have it.
  2. Snegovok
    Snegovok 22 March 2013 10: 32 New
    +1
    Nothing and ours will soon begin to build large ships, everything has its own time, but I want it now)))
    1. igor.borov775
      igor.borov775 22 March 2013 11: 27 New
      +2
      You read poorly that they plan to cover your coast with no ships of the ocean zone and that is not enough, There are no enterprises for such a scale, And to be honest, there is no money
  3. Arberes
    Arberes 22 March 2013 10: 37 New
    +4
    Although the US and rot ??? but somehow sad to me from their program!
    The only thing that comforted me was a reduction of 16 units, otherwise it was completely unbuckled in a sausage!
    1. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 22 March 2013 14: 56 New
      +2
      Well, since the 30s the country has not experienced shocks - not military, not economic. She kept all the gold during the war, but now where is the gold? Well done.
  4. Nayhas
    Nayhas 22 March 2013 10: 37 New
    +1
    Yes, "reduction", in 5 years 41 ships will only surrender, but how many are in construction, with delivery dates later than 2017.? And why do they need 9 more new destroyers, do you eat them with your ass anyway?
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 22 March 2013 10: 45 New
      0
      Quote: Nayhas
      And why do they need 9 more new destroyers, do you eat them with your ass anyway?

      A good multipurpose ship will always come in handy. wink
  5. Vladimirets
    Vladimirets 22 March 2013 10: 44 New
    +1
    It would be interesting to know what types of ships and how many they threw out of the plan?
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 22 March 2013 11: 49 New
      0
      HZ, Zumwalt can? Although they laid the three and will obviously complete them, they didn’t plan anymore. Probably LCS reduced.
  6. Arberes
    Arberes 22 March 2013 10: 46 New
    +2
    Quote: Nayhas
    Yes, "reduction", in 5 years 41 ships will only surrender, but how many are in construction, with delivery dates later than 2017.? And why do they need 9 more new destroyers, do you eat them with your ass anyway?

    Well, obsolete will be steadily written off.
    And the Fleet is ALL of them and they will keep it in excellent condition! hi
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 22 March 2013 11: 34 New
      -2
      Yeah, they are back in 2010. launched a program to upgrade 11 Orly Burke class ships, so they won’t write anything off. For example, the lead will extend the life of up to 40 years, and it was launched in 1989., and adopt in 1991.
      1. Don
        Don 22 March 2013 12: 32 New
        +2
        Quote: Nayhas
        Yeah, they are back in 2010. launched a program to upgrade 11 Orly Burke class ships, so they won’t write anything off. For example, the lead will extend the life of up to 40 years, and it was launched in 1989., and adopt in 1991.

        This is where you read this, DDG-51 Arleigh Burke, 1991, extend the life of up to 40 years?
        1. Nayhas
          Nayhas 22 March 2013 14: 02 New
          0
          Wikipedia writes, but I read about an upgrade program in an article, they’re not going to write them off, and what's the point, the oldest of 20 years, is not a deadline for a ship.
    2. igor.borov775
      igor.borov775 22 March 2013 11: 37 New
      +1
      You see, a submarine came in handy that there was no roofing felts near the US coast, but the result of everything ,,, this action is obvious, They should receive the initiative from Europe, the tone is set, Now they must take care,
  7. queen
    queen 22 March 2013 10: 52 New
    +1
    Quote: Arberes
    over the next 5 years 8,2 warships

    I am not a mathematician, but still.
    1. Arberes
      Arberes 22 March 2013 11: 28 New
      +3
      Quote: regin
      I am not a mathematician, but still.

      Eight write, two in mind!
      But actually, this is not my quote? hi drinks
  8. Dangerous
    Dangerous 22 March 2013 12: 00 New
    +2
    We read, licked, sighed sadly and went to work on, for the good of our country
  9. zao74
    zao74 22 March 2013 14: 47 New
    +1
    I hope this is only the beginning of the reduction of weapons in the states ...
    1. evgenii67
      evgenii67 22 March 2013 15: 25 New
      +3
      Quote: zao74
      I hope this is only the beginning of the reduction of weapons in the states ...

      And I hope to reduce staff in the States repeat
      1. Kaa
        Kaa 22 March 2013 18: 29 New
        +4
        Quote: evgenii67
        And I hope to reduce staff in the States

        Yes, God be with them, there is no need to reduce it ... even better if there are more of them ... One suggestion is to change the name - not the USA, but the NSA - the independent (from each other) States of America, in return for the collapse of the USSR ... let them turn around, and then integrate again ... not until the fleet will be, what is newer, we’ll buy it “for scrap metal and casino” ... yes
        1. ixsus
          ixsus 22 March 2013 22: 02 New
          0
          Greetings to Kaa.
          HA! HA! HA! 5 points.
        2. evgenii67
          evgenii67 22 March 2013 22: 18 New
          0
          Quote: Kaa
          Yes, God be with them, there is no need to reduce it ... even better if there are more of them ... One suggestion is to change the name - not the USA, but the NSA - independent (from each other) States of America

          This is 5 !!!!!!!! good
    2. ixsus
      ixsus 22 March 2013 22: 01 New
      0
      Greetings zao74
      How many candy wrappers do not print, anyway you will have to finish someday. They have a lot of expenses on the fleet and bases around the world. After the collapse of the USSR, they developed not badly, but the navel is already torn to contain all this.
    3. ixsus
      ixsus 22 March 2013 22: 05 New
      0
      Greetings zao74
      How many candy wrappers do not print, anyway you will have to finish someday. They have a lot of expenses on the fleet and bases around the world. After the collapse of the USSR, they developed not badly, but the navel is already torn to contain it all.
  10. povkonavt
    povkonavt 22 March 2013 23: 29 New
    0
    Quote: Kaa
    NSA - independent (from each other)

    100