The Defense Ministry warned of an imminent strike on Ukraine in response to the night attack on the Bryansk region by Western missiles

30 401 107
The Defense Ministry warned of an imminent strike on Ukraine in response to the night attack on the Bryansk region by Western missiles

Ukraine has again launched a strike on Russian territories using missiles Western-made, a response to this attack will certainly follow. The Russian Defense Ministry warned Kyiv about this.

According to the data provided by the military department, on the night from Monday to Tuesday, January 14, 2025, Ukrainian armed forces attacked the Bryansk region of Russia with six American-made ATACMS operational-tactical missiles, as well as six British-made Storm Shadow air-launched cruise missiles. Ukrainian Drones aircraft type, a total of 31 units.



During the repulse of the attack, all missiles and UAVs launched from the territory of Ukraine were shot down by Russian systems Defense, there are no casualties. The military has not reported any consequences of the attack on the ground.

At the same time, Kyiv attempted to strike Crimea with two British Storm Shadow missiles, but both missiles were intercepted by air defense systems over the Black Sea.

In connection with what happened, the Russian Ministry of Defense warns that this attack will not go unanswered, and will hit Ukraine in the near future. The military will determine the targets of the strike.

Meanwhile, a number of Ukrainian resources report that Zelensky specifically gave the order to strike deep into Russia in order to receive a "response" from Russia and accuse it of striking Ukraine. Such is the perverted logic.
107 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +16
    14 January 2025 14: 55
    Yes, and again there will be an attack by imported missiles and Kyiv will respond, why not those who supplied these missiles.
    1. +17
      14 January 2025 16: 55
      no, that's not true... - And not those who not only delivered these missiles... but also conducted satellite reconnaissance... entered the target coordinates and flight missions.
    2. -2
      14 January 2025 17: 40
      Murmur 55
      Today, 14: 55
      Yes, and again there will be an attack by imported missiles and Kyiv will respond, why not those who supplied these missiles.
      hi In big geopolitics, nothing happens for no reason: I can assume that after the elections of Strelianoy Ukha there were secret contacts between the new bidet team (Fashington headquarters) and the Kremlin, where the penguins asked the Russian Federation not to allow a sharp escalation with the risk of a Nuclear War, so as not to interfere with the inauguration.
      The small-breds provoke the Russian Federation and the penguins together with gayrope into a clash, which is confirmed by history for more than five centuries.
      Elon Musk, with the permission of his master, zealously took up the cleansing of the elite of the small-minded liberals and gayrope, insulting many leaders personally on the networks, since elections and a change of leaders in a number of countries will take place in the near future.
      The victory of the Russian Federation is forged by its Armed Forces in the SVO and the main goal should be the unconditional surrender of the entire Bandera state with NATO not necessary along with the fulfillment of all the goals and objectives of the SVO.
      I emotionally support everyone for the strength and power of waging any war, so that Victory comes faster. soldier
      1. 0
        15 January 2025 01: 09
        Quote: ZovSailor
        In big geopolitics, nothing happens for nothing. The victory of the Russian Federation is forged by its Armed Forces in the North-Eastern Military District and...

        I wouldn't be surprised if your assumption matches the situation: the Kremlin and the White House will sort things out. I apologize profusely to everyone on the front lines, but the actions of mo... well, you can't copy quarter 95. There will be no blitzkrieg and everyone sincerely hopes to see planned work, and not warnings on the Internet.
        1. -3
          15 January 2025 01: 52
          Pete mitchell
          Today, 01: 09
          I wouldn't be surprised if your assumption matches the situation: the Kremlin and the White House will sort things out. I apologize profusely to everyone on the front lines, but the actions of mo... well, you can't copy quarter 95. There will be no blitzkrieg and everyone sincerely hopes to see planned work, and not warnings on the Internet.
          hi Well, sir, this position is close to the statement of the Deputy President of the Russian Federation N. Patrushev.
          I would dare to object and add to the completely obvious:
          1. The whole point is that the Winner dictates his demands to the losing side of the NWO, and in this case to the suzerain of the vassal, which is Penguinia.
          2. At this stage, I consider the issue of holding negotiations premature, despite the successes of the RF Armed Forces in the Central Military District, although it is possible to conduct a diplomatic exchange of opinions without interrupting military operations, clarifying the positions of the parties.
          Time is on the side of the Russian Federation, since, by and large, Streliannyi Ukh, in order to fulfill his MAGA (make America great again) election promises, is now more profitable (as a businessman and trader) to use the bright theses of including Canada, Greenland, and the Panama Canal into the United States.
          There is a fight ahead with Uncle Xi for the dominance of green in the world, as well as the drain of 36 trillion of external government debt, hemorrhoids in the Middle East with the help of the BBC, and the weakening of the influence of the IRI.
          The Russian Federation needs control over the entire Black Sea coast of Bandera State, together with Odessa, Izmail, Reni and the original Russian lands, so as not to be deceived once again.
          3. There is no doubt that Strelyanoe Ukho is more of an enemy than a friend for Russians and the Fatherland,
          and therefore it is impossible to exclude the development by the false Under-West of Operation "Unthinkable-3" in defiance of Churchill's half-forgotten brainchild "Unthinkable-1945", which is quite possibly planned by the small-minded, who have a disagreement with the mattress makers on the future world order, in particular, with the new bidet team (Fashington headquarters), who want to push Gayrope against the Russian Federation.
          4. There are still many positions that need to be resolved not in a month, but over many years, as it is necessary to transfer the Russian economy for a long-term confrontation with enemies.
          In a word, the path to Victory will be difficult and, as the Emperor of Russia Alexander III said, Russia has two allies, its army and navy. soldier
      2. Aag
        -1
        15 January 2025 14: 01
        Quote: ZovSailor
        Murmur 55
        Today, 14: 55
        Yes, and again there will be an attack by imported missiles and Kyiv will respond, why not those who supplied these missiles.
        hi In big geopolitics, nothing happens for no reason: I can assume that after the elections of Strelianoy Ukha there were secret contacts between the new bidet team (Fashington headquarters) and the Kremlin, where the penguins asked the Russian Federation not to allow a sharp escalation with the risk of a Nuclear War, so as not to interfere with the inauguration.
        The small-breds provoke the Russian Federation and the penguins together with gayrope into a clash, which is confirmed by history for more than five centuries.
        Elon Musk, with the permission of his master, zealously took up the cleansing of the elite of the small-minded liberals and gayrope, insulting many leaders personally on the networks, since elections and a change of leaders in a number of countries will take place in the near future.
        The victory of the Russian Federation is forged by its Armed Forces in the SVO and the main goal should be the unconditional surrender of the entire Bandera state with NATO not necessary along with the fulfillment of all the goals and objectives of the SVO.
        I emotionally support everyone for the strength and power of waging any war, so that Victory comes faster. soldier

        I guess I agree with you. Besides that:
        "... The victory of the Russian Federation is forged by its Armed Forces in the SVO and the main goal should be the unconditional surrender of the entire Bandera state with NATO, no need, along with the fulfillment of all the goals and objectives of the SVO...".
        1) As experience has shown, all heroism (sincere thanks to the guys, girls, everyone who cares!) is easily leveled by political and economic decisions...
        2) NATO capitulation?!!! There is no smell of capitulation in 404 yet! (only from TV).
        3) Please remind me about the goals and objectives of the SVO. Or better yet, explain, "chew it up". It would be even better if you explained the understanding of the two "De-..." Then (in 2022), - and now (in (2025)...
        1. -1
          15 January 2025 14: 18
          Aag
          Today, 14: 01
          I guess I agree with you. Besides that:
          3) Please remind me about the goals and objectives of the SVO. Or better yet, explain, "chew it up." It would be even better if you explained the understanding of the two "De-..." Then (in 2022), - and now (in (2025)).
          hi Well, sir, study the technical part of the material.
          I won’t take away the politicians’ bread, but obvious things are already clearly visible even without the bright slogans of Strelyanoy Ukha.
          The SVO is moving in the right direction, and the planned goals and objectives will only increase, as the war with the false Under-West goes on.
          The spiders of the liquid drug führer will devour each other against the backdrop of the so-called elections; this year, the Bandera state will cease to exist, just like a little over 100 years ago. soldier
          1. Aag
            0
            15 January 2025 14: 24
            Quote: ZovSailor
            Aag
            Today, 14: 01
            I guess I agree with you. Besides that:
            3) Please remind me about the goals and objectives of the SVO. Or better yet, explain, "chew it up." It would be even better if you explained the understanding of the two "De-..." Then (in 2022), - and now (in (2025)).
            hi Well, sir, study the technical part of the material.
            I won’t take away the politicians’ bread, but obvious things are already clearly visible even without the bright slogans of Strelyanoy Ukha.
            The SVO is moving in the right direction, and the planned goals and objectives will only increase, as the war with the false Under-West goes on.
            The spiders of the liquid drug führer will devour each other against the backdrop of the so-called elections; this year, the Bandera state will cease to exist, just like a little over 100 years ago. soldier

            Can you answer anything in essence?
            ... And! - You're talking about a "shot ear" again...
            That is, we don’t have our own Policy?(!)...
    3. 0
      15 January 2025 11: 21
      Quote: Murmur 55
      Yes, and again there will be an attack by imported missiles and Kyiv will respond, why not those who supplied these missiles.

      This is a proxy war from the West and no one will unleash a third world war until a certain moment. It is much easier and safer to strike Ukraine in such a way that its maintenance will become not just burdensome for the West, but ruinous. To destroy the energy sector, gas storage facilities, and finally strike the bridges.
  2. +19
    14 January 2025 14: 56
    We should not warn, but do our job.
  3. +14
    14 January 2025 14: 57
    If they would respond immediately and to a swing without warnings - then there would be some sense, but as they play in a sandbox - "offended" ... "warned". They were afraid to do that with the Soviet Union. They knew that the response would come immediately and without warning!
    1. +2
      14 January 2025 19: 06
      Quote: Vladimir the sea master
      and on the swing... and the devil...

      on the head, on the head, on the back, the demons flew in and, vying with each other, tensely and laughingly, they learned the Russian language. lol
  4. +8
    14 January 2025 14: 57
    Ze is begging, so let him get it, and preferably not with loud statements from D.A., but so that the Ukrainian Nazis' forelocks and forelocks really stand on end. So that they jump at night from every rustle. Substations and 750 kV switchgear are just begging for arrivals.
    1. +8
      14 January 2025 15: 01
      Montezuma hi, Zelensky seems to know something and therefore is not afraid, and the blow will be, as they are already called, on duty.
      1. +2
        14 January 2025 15: 05
        Quote: Murmur 55
        Zelensky seems to know something and therefore is not afraid

        Ze may not be afraid, he will hide in some bunker, but there are many objects, the landing on which will be very painful. There are opportunities, it is time to take off the white gloves.
        1. +4
          14 January 2025 15: 08
          Montezuma, there are dozens of such objects, but what's the point, nothing depends on you and me.
        2. -2
          14 January 2025 15: 44
          There are opportunities, it's time to take off the white gloves.

          Whoever is going to remove it, the "guarantor", for him the Ukrainians are brothers, how can you really fight with "brothers", he doesn't feel sorry for Russian citizens, they don't give birth yet, he works "like a galley" for this, here he closed down production, here he destroys villages to the roots, here you have pensions at 65, here you have a minimum of living, here you have crazy inflation, here you have optimization of medicine, closing maternity hospitals - I don't want to give birth, you can endlessly list all the "achievements" of the "guarantor" for 24 years...
        3. +6
          14 January 2025 15: 56
          Quote: Montezuma
          It's time to take off the white gloves.

          Comrade Stalin and the Soviet people defeated the enemy near Moscow, Leningrad, Stalingrad in 3 years, liberated the Caucasus, crossed the state border of the USSR and liberated Europe in full. It was 1944.
          And we are wondering whether to take off the glove, because it is not convenient to shoot.
          1. -7
            14 January 2025 16: 10
            Quote: Neo-9947
            Comrade Stalin and the Soviet people for 3 years

            You forgot to say that Comrade Stalin and the Soviet people lost almost twenty million people in three years. Do you dream of victories at the same price?
            1. +4
              14 January 2025 16: 13
              So you know everything.
              In that case, please state how much the Russian Federation lost during the Second World War.
              Give me the number. You switched to numbers yourself, so please,
              1. -4
                14 January 2025 16: 15
                Quote: Neo-9947
                So you know everything?

                What a strange conclusion. I am simply familiar with the history that they so love to interpret here in their favor, emphasizing some things and forgetting others.

                Quote: Neo-9947
                how much did the Russian Federation lose during the SVO

                No idea, but definitely not twenty million.
                What versions do you have?
                1. 0
                  14 January 2025 16: 19
                  And how many?
                  30?
                  If you are not ready to compare numbers because you don't know them, then don't switch to them.
                  1. -1
                    14 January 2025 18: 49
                    Quote: Neo-9947
                    And how many?

                    I already said that I don’t know and therefore I’m ready to listen to your version.

                    Quote: Neo-9947
                    If you are not ready to compare numbers

                    I'm not comparing. You're the one trying to draw some analogies, on unclear grounds.
                2. Aag
                  0
                  15 January 2025 14: 12
                  Quote from: nik-mazur
                  Quote: Neo-9947
                  So you know everything?

                  What a strange conclusion. I am simply familiar with the history that they so love to interpret here in their favor, emphasizing some things and forgetting others.

                  Quote: Neo-9947
                  how much did the Russian Federation lose during the SVO

                  No idea, but definitely not twenty million.
                  What versions do you have?

                  I won't say for sure. History is written by the winner... So (14 or 20 million, - it is clear that these are the fates of entire generations, a greater number of people)... But!!! Evaluate the real breakthrough in industrialization, scientific, sports, everyday achievements, the growth of the USSR's authority in the world...
                  What do we see now?!
                  Try to remember how we laughed at MuDko! (new additions outshine past mistakes... ((()...
                  1. -1
                    15 January 2025 15: 54
                    Quote: AAG
                    Assess the real breakthrough in industrialization, scientific, sports, everyday achievements, the growth of the USSR's authority in the world

                    Why? Will this somehow affect the number of losses?
                    In general, I think it's pointless to compare the past with the present - another country, other people, another time, another world. The only thing more stupid than that is to assume what would have happened if Stalin were here now. Or Peter I, or Ivan the Terrible, or Prince Vladimir, or... This is only good for fantasy plots for the amusement of the most respectable public.

                    Quote: Alexey Alekseev_5
                    11 people who died in the North-Eastern Military District were buried in our village. The village has a population of 7 thousand.

                    The main thing is not to extrapolate based on this data. Usually in such cases you get nonsense.
                    1. Aag
                      0
                      15 January 2025 16: 44
                      Quote from: nik-mazur
                      Quote: AAG
                      Assess the real breakthrough in industrialization, scientific, sports, everyday achievements, the growth of the USSR's authority in the world

                      Why? Will this somehow affect the number of losses?
                      In general, I think it's pointless to compare the past with the present - another country, other people, another time, another world. The only thing more stupid than that is to assume what would have happened if Stalin were here now. Or Peter I, or Ivan the Terrible, or Prince Vladimir, or... This is only good for fantasy plots for the amusement of the most respectable public.

                      Quote: Alexey Alekseev_5
                      11 people who died in the North-Eastern Military District were buried in our village. The village has a population of 7 thousand.

                      The main thing is not to extrapolate based on this data. Usually in such cases you get nonsense.

                      You know, I'm probably writing too much: yesterday, last night I talked to my childhood friend... From Riga. What's typical is that they live for today; about children, grandchildren: - "This is their life!" (like many of us, "Temporary Workers"... Partly He (they) are right - Live here and now!!!
              2. 0
                15 January 2025 09: 06
                I can't speak for the whole of the Russian Federation, but 11 people from our village who died in the North Military District are buried. The village has a population of 7 thousand: 6 missing in action. 5 in hospital. Everyone is remembered.
            2. +5
              14 January 2025 16: 35
              A stretch. The 20 million figure includes civilian losses as a result of punitive acts. The combat losses of the Red Army and the Wehrmacht were comparable. By the way, Khinshtein just announced that it was time to create a register of missing persons in the Kursk region, i.e. no one had dealt with civilian losses there until now.
              1. +1
                14 January 2025 18: 50
                Quote: Boris Sergeev
                A stretch. 20 million includes civilian losses... Combat losses of the Red Army and the Wehrmacht were comparable

                OK. In three years, the Red Army lost about eight million soldiers and officers.
                Has anything fundamentally changed?
                1. -1
                  15 January 2025 09: 26
                  The Red Army lost about 8 million during the entire war, and this number includes prisoners of war who died in German camps. The Wehrmacht also lost about 8 million.

                  On December 4, 2022, there was an article on Military Review with an analysis of all the figures and estimates.
                  1. 0
                    15 January 2025 12: 40
                    Quote: Boris Sergeev
                    The Red Army lost about 8 million during the entire war.

                    The ratings range from eight to twelve. The article on VO is one of the opinions, as firmly founded as all the others.

                    Quote: Boris Sergeev
                    This number includes prisoners of war who died in German camps

                    Yes, in German captivity one in five Soviet prisoners of war survived. In Soviet captivity it was the opposite – 20% of German prisoners did not survive. That is why I am inclined to believe that our military losses are greater than the Germans.
            3. -2
              14 January 2025 18: 42
              Quote from: nik-mazur
              You forgot to say that Comrade Stalin and the Soviet people lost almost twenty million people in three years. Do you dream of victories at the same price?

              You forgot to say that this figure also includes losses in the occupied territories.
              It's not nice to be hypocritical about this.
              I am simply familiar with the history that they love to interpret here to their advantage, emphasizing some things and forgetting others.

              This is about you too.
              1. +1
                14 January 2025 18: 53
                Quote: ettore
                You forgot to say that this figure also includes losses in the occupied territories.

                You reminded me – what has changed? The losses of the Red Army and the Russian army have become comparable?

                Quote: ettore
                This is about you too

                And what do you think I forgot?
            4. 0
              14 January 2025 19: 14
              The Soviet people lost almost twenty million people in three years. Do you dream of victories at the same price?

              I'm talking about the downvoters. It's a pity there are no names of the commentators. But it's clear that there are 3 to 5 supporters of the CIPSO on many articles. We also have a paper-sofa war here. But why? It's useless to agitate those who were connected with the army, and I hope there are most of them. They have their own strong opinion. It's probably better not to respond to them.
              1. +1
                14 January 2025 19: 45
                Quote: Alexey Lantukh
                supporters of the CIPSO regularly appear on many articles from 3 to 5

                It seems to me more. Plus all-shit-suckers and turbo-patriots are flocking in. What's surprising is that quite often these seemingly opposite poles somehow coincide in their assessments.
                1. 0
                  15 January 2025 09: 30
                  "Guardians" also regularly come running, and you can spit in their eyes - it's all God's dew. Explain to begin with, where did the Black Sea Fleet go in the third year of the "SVO". Does it still exist, if you hear more about Ukrainian naval drones than about Russian ships?
                  1. 0
                    15 January 2025 12: 41
                    Quote: Boris Sergeev
                    where did the Black Sea Fleet go in the third year of the "SVO"

                    As far as I know, it's in Novorossiysk. Why?

                    Quote: Boris Sergeev
                    "guards" also come running, and you can spit in their eyes - it's all God's dew

                    In this point, the all-shit-seekers and turbo-patriots are no different from the “protectors”.
                    1. 0
                      16 January 2025 09: 32
                      And the fact that the enemy has developed measures that have effectively excluded the Black Sea Fleet from combat operations. And no countermeasures have been developed in 3 years.

                      In the same way, the air defense system is effectively nullified if slow-moving UAVs can fly thousands of kilometers and burn out military and industrial facilities with their “debris” and “bangs.”
                      1. +1
                        16 January 2025 12: 01
                        Quote: Boris Sergeev
                        the enemy has developed measures that have effectively excluded the Black Sea Fleet from combat operations

                        Did this somehow help the enemy win the war?

                        Quote: Boris Sergeev
                        In fact, the air defense system has been reset

                        No, if our air defense was zeroed out, then it would not be slow-moving UAVs that would fly, but high-speed aircraft, missiles, and generally everything that can fly. And they would actually burn out military and industrial facilities with complete impunity. And not a thousand kilometers away, but right in the immediate rear.
                        By the way, our much more powerful blows are often called pinpricks here. But Ukrainian pinpricks are a total burning out. Which kind of hints at...
            5. +1
              14 January 2025 20: 27
              You, sir, do not confuse WAR (for the very existence of the people and the country) with all this negative
            6. -1
              14 January 2025 20: 51
              And you think that these sacrifices were in vain? Maybe we should have just given up? Fighted somehow "more gently"? Signed some kind of treaty? WHO ARE YOU????
              1. +2
                14 January 2025 21: 46
                Quote: Stoler
                You, sir, don't confuse WAR

                I am not confused. This comrade, to whom I replied, for some reason is trying to compare the Great Patriotic War for the existence of the state and the people with a military operation against a hostile quasi-state.

                Quote: Stoler
                WHO ARE YOU

                And who are you to ask who I am?
                1. 0
                  14 January 2025 22: 14
                  What got you so worked up about the WHO question? laughing I already understood - Anti Stalinist and Anti Soviet negative And about the mentioned victims? And how (or) could they have been avoided??? And about the "price", please. WHAT IS THE PRICE OF VICTORY?
                  1. +2
                    14 January 2025 22: 36
                    Quote: Stoler
                    WHAT IS THE PRICE OF VICTORY

                    What are you yelling about? Where did you see me talking about "useless sacrifices", "folding our paws", "fighting more gently", or about devaluing the victory and other nonsense that you yourself came up with, attributed to me and now demand an answer?
                    Try not to react only to individual words, but to delve into the meaning of sentences. I hinted that it is pointless to compare the most terrible war in human history and a very limited-scale military operation. In the Great Patriotic War, the victims were in the millions, and now there are about one and a half million fighting on both sides. What comparisons can there be?

                    Quote: Stoler
                    I already understood - Anti Stalinist and Anti Soviet

                    Actually, I don’t care – I’m not fixated on the past.
            7. 0
              15 January 2025 08: 29
              Well, the scale of the battles was incomparable. At the same time, more than half of them were civilians and died in captivity. Who largely died because of the policy of extermination. In terms of military losses, the ratio was 1 to 1,2-1,5.
              By the way, what are the losses of the Russian Federation in the North-Eastern Military District?
              1. 0
                15 January 2025 12: 32
                Quote: Single-n
                Well, the scale of the battles was incomparable.

                Thanks, Cap. That's exactly what I meant.

                Quote: Single-n
                civilians and those who died in captivity

                But civilians and prisoners weren’t considered part of the Soviet people?

                Quote: Single-n
                and what are the losses of the Russian Federation in the North-Eastern Military District?

                You'd better ask the Ministry of Defense - no one here knows.
                1. +1
                  15 January 2025 12: 33
                  I think that even the Ministry of Defense doesn’t really know.
                  1. 0
                    15 January 2025 12: 43
                    Quote: Single-n
                    I think that even in the Ministry of Defense they don’t really know

                    Then why are you asking?
                    1. 0
                      15 January 2025 12: 45
                      I've had enough. I'm sitting outside the window like a dog and howling at the moon.
      2. 0
        14 January 2025 18: 38
        Quote: Murmur 55
        Zelensky seems to know something and therefore is not afraid, but the blow will be, as they are already called, on duty.

        He just doesn't care about the response and consequences. There is such a category of people with damaged consciousness.
    2. +4
      14 January 2025 15: 14
      Quote: Montezuma
      Substations and switchgear for 750 kV are just begging to be flown in.

      For three years the substations have been begging for it to arrive, but so far nothing has flown at 750 kV.
      1. +3
        14 January 2025 15: 20
        carpenter hi, someone REALLY needs them to stand safe and sound.
  5. +7
    14 January 2025 14: 58
    Why warn? So that the rats hide?
  6. +9
    14 January 2025 15: 00
    Let's also say where and when, and in what quantity. What kind of SVO is this? We're killing our own people in dozens, there are thousands of wounded. Oh yeah, I forgot, these are our brothers.
    1. +2
      14 January 2025 15: 16
      got really already, I agree
    2. AAK
      0
      14 January 2025 15: 48
      Well, those who, at the end of the third year of the SVO, continue to harp on about the "brotherly" people, probably consider them "brothers" and not us... and so the substations, and the hydroelectric power plants/state district power plants/thermal power plants, and the gas transmission system, and bridges, and tunnels, and ports, and factories, and transport hubs and interchanges - there are not dozens, but hundreds of real targets... and our wounded and dead soldiers and civilians no longer worry the higher-ups so much, from there more often comes "... put in a good word for the poor Bandera..."
    3. 0
      15 January 2025 08: 30
      Not brothers. But respected partners. We must understand.
  7. +14
    14 January 2025 15: 01
    And how many foreign-made missiles have arrived since the "nut" accident? Why did they decide to respond only now? - and not even respond, but only announce the response? How tired I am of this chatter of our impotents...
    1. +5
      14 January 2025 15: 06
      That's exactly right. The chatter of impotents. How many of our people are dying, how many are wounded, how many fires, and they still warn.
    2. -1
      14 January 2025 15: 40
      After each arrival, the enemy announced something. But the response was somehow unconvincing, like about the already destroyed thermal power plant. There must have been decision-making centers there.
      1. 0
        14 January 2025 15: 45
        I don’t know whether there are decision-making centers there or not, but massive missile strikes were carried out on Ukrainian targets, it was, of course, not a “hazelnut”, but it happened.
        1. +2
          14 January 2025 16: 04
          Well, I don't remember any obituaries for the fixers. There is no sign of any change in the electricity supply plan in Ukraine.
          1. 0
            14 January 2025 16: 10
            Do you want to destroy the civilian population of Ukraine?
            1. 0
              14 January 2025 16: 34
              Are the people of Ukraine the decision-makers in the decision-making centers? If only they are, then yes.
            2. +2
              15 January 2025 08: 31
              And we only have 2 options? Either impotence or all in the dust?
          2. -2
            14 January 2025 16: 16
            There is no visible change in the electricity supply plan in Ukraine
            - you probably don't read enough on this topic, note that it's not me who's giving you the minus, which means you're wrong about something.
            1. -1
              14 January 2025 16: 36
              No, those who don't want to see such topics downvote. It is accepted here by many that everything is done as it should be, no one in the military top brass sabotages anything.
  8. +3
    14 January 2025 15: 04
    The answer must be unambiguous about the manufacturers of these missiles! Is it really impossible to destroy the plant in Scotland where the Storm Shadle missiles are made? It is shameful to read such things and very offensive for the inaction of the state leaders!! Until we give a serious answer, we will suffer humiliation and insults from all Western and European curs...
    1. -3
      14 January 2025 15: 10
      Quote: Andrey Andreev_2
      The answer must be unambiguous about the manufacturers of these missiles! Is it really impossible to destroy the plant in Scotland where the Storm Shadle missiles are made? It is shameful to read such things and very offensive for the inaction of the state leaders!! Until we give a serious answer, we will suffer humiliation and insults from all Western and European curs...

      Okay, let's say we hit a Scottish military plant, then they hit ours, somewhere in St. Petersburg. What next?
      1. +6
        14 January 2025 15: 16
        Guess who said this and when:

        “Now a few important, very important words for those who may be tempted from the outside to intervene in the events taking place. Whoever tries to interfere with us, and even more so create threats to our country, to our people, should know that Russia’s response will be immediate and will lead you to consequences that you have never encountered in your history. We are ready for any development of events. All necessary decisions in this regard have been made. I hope that I will be heard."
        1. -1
          14 January 2025 15: 32
          Quote: Boris Sergeev
          Guess who said this and when:

          "... All necessary decisions in this regard have been made. I hope that I will be heard."

          So I still don't understand whether you are for or against)
          1. +4
            14 January 2025 15: 39
            What does my opinion have to do with it? Those who planned the SVO allowed for the possibility of external interference and initially warned the "enemies/partners" (underline as appropriate) that in this case the Russian Federation's response would be directed at those who interfere. They warned, but have not actually done anything in 3 years. What then can stop the enemies from striking a military plant in St. Petersburg? They won't get into trouble for it.
            1. -2
              15 January 2025 05: 49
              We'll grow a hazel tree, then we'll have an answer, there's nothing to answer with, but hang in there. The boss promised.
          2. +2
            14 January 2025 16: 35
            then they are in our

            What next?
            They're already hitting! Here and now!
        2. +1
          15 January 2025 01: 31
          Quote: Boris Sergeev
          Guess who said it and when

          Why guess, he once promised to kill you in the toilets too.
      2. +3
        14 January 2025 15: 41
        Let's say they have been hitting our military production facilities for a long time with the same missiles and drones, just from Ukrainian territory. What next?
  9. 0
    14 January 2025 15: 05
    The Defense Ministry warned of an imminent strike on Ukraine in response to the night attack on the Bryansk region by Western missiles

    It was in vain that they were warned... They would have lived better in fear and looking out for their own skin...
    1. +3
      14 January 2025 15: 50
      So no one is afraid of threats anymore, the next strikes on substations or houses will only anger the Ukrainian population and that’s all.
    2. +2
      14 January 2025 16: 22
      It was better for them to live in fear and look out for their own skin...

      Why would they be afraid of anything if no one even punishes them for it?
    3. The comment was deleted.
  10. -2
    14 January 2025 15: 08
    Red flags, inexpensive. Pick up from Tehran.
  11. +5
    14 January 2025 15: 14
    Time for the triumph of absurdity... The Ministry of Defense warns the enemy... Warns - the Jewish Bandera supporters, Nazis, etc., Well, the gangs of the Kyiv regime, in general. A circus with horses, and nothing more. sad
  12. +5
    14 January 2025 15: 18
    There will be no super-response - negotiations are just around the corner, we have been waiting for them for a long time, we cannot spoil the "picture".
  13. +4
    14 January 2025 15: 22
    . a response to this attack will certainly follow. The Russian Defense Ministry warned Kyiv about this.

    Khodja Nasreddin promised the padishah to teach the donkey to speak, but... after 12 years.
    Here on the site some comrades like to write "we can repeat the march on Berlin" and so on, BUT they are trying to put an equal sign between the military-economic power of the Soviet Union and Russia.
    Comparisons between the Soviet Union and Russia in this regard are completely inappropriate.
    1. +1
      15 January 2025 08: 33
      It's not just economic power. The leadership itself is fundamentally different. It doesn't need this campaign at all. They will beg for negotiations.
  14. +2
    14 January 2025 15: 30
    will arrive in Ukraine soon.

    Why about Ukraine, there were loud statements from the Russian (I won't call him ours) president that the answer will be to those who supply and launch the missiles, but I don't see an answer either to Great Britain (MI6 should have been destroyed a long time ago), or to the Yankees... He doesn't have the guts...
  15. +2
    14 January 2025 15: 47
    How polite our people are in the Ministry of Defense. They warn us - and we will respond somehow. And the warning looks like a request for permission. If we don't have enough conventional missiles - fire off some TNW. Everything will immediately calm down.
    1. 0
      14 January 2025 18: 48
      Quote: Karelian
      How polite our people are in the Ministry of Defense. They warn us - and we will respond somehow. And the warning looks like a request for permission.

      The intrigue is who is asking for permission - Biden or Trump?
      1. 0
        14 January 2025 20: 00
        Well, not Zelensky, the only thing he owns in Ukraine is the T-shirt he's wearing
        1. -1
          14 January 2025 20: 10
          Nobody talks about this.
    2. -1
      15 January 2025 05: 45
      Half of the General Staff is stuck in business, so as not to harm themselves.
  16. -1
    14 January 2025 16: 07
    ..The Ministry of Defense warns that this attack will not go unanswered
    Well, we're waiting, we're waiting, we've eaten all the zhdanki. Where are your answers, holy moly? request
  17. +2
    14 January 2025 16: 21
    The 3rd was ending (third) year of the SVO, and the Russian Ministry of Defense continued to inflict reciprocal strikes, even warning the enemy before doing so.
  18. +5
    14 January 2025 16: 23
    Imagine if our Iskanders from Cuba were pounding the US, and the US President was mumbling something about red lines in response. laughing laughing laughing
    I find it hard to believe this. laughing
    The whole world would probably call him an idiot and the US would stop respecting him. laughing
  19. 0
    14 January 2025 17: 16
    Questa volta è il Ministero della Difesa russo (esplicitamente, in prima persona) ad assumersi le responsabilità dell'avvertimento alla Verchovna Rada della prossimo venturo attacco russo in risposta ai lanci Missilistici nella Regione russa di Bryansk, penso proprio che "forse" sarà la volta buona a Kiev di calmarla nel fare ancora la voce grossa.
  20. +5
    14 January 2025 17: 40
    The decision-making centers will remain the same. And our leaders will continue to blah blah blah. Some kind of distrust is already being developed on a permanent basis. It's time to shove the fixed matches in one place and have one cruel bang.
  21. +3
    14 January 2025 18: 02
    Shurygin is right, of course.
    Picture taken from Parker,
    Be good.
  22. +3
    14 January 2025 20: 03
    And who is conducting the SVO? Kyiv attacked, we responded (and even with a mandatory warning) - yes, this can go on for several years! This is how they imagined the operation, everything according to plan? In the end, only the missile manufacturers benefit. No. hi
  23. +2
    14 January 2025 22: 19
    So where are the "red lines" and the attacks on the decision-making centers? England is literally begging for something to fly in to visit.
  24. 0
    15 January 2025 00: 28
    Quote: Murmur 55
    Yes, and again there will be an attack by imported missiles and Kyiv will respond, why not those who supplied these missiles.

    If, say, the Russian Federation supplied tanks and anti-aircraft systems to African country A, and the latter started a war with African country B, this does not mean that the Russian Federation is fighting B. It is A and B that are fighting.
  25. 0
    15 January 2025 00: 39
    Who is more to blame, the one who made the gun or the one who pulled the trigger?
  26. -1
    15 January 2025 05: 42
    Our leaky air defense missed a bunch of strikes! What if they use tomahawks? What if we can't cope with slow-moving drones? And where the hell does this fucking hazel grow so that we can give a serious answer, and not with mosquito flavors? Or is our air defense for a five-year period? If you can't f..., don't torture your ass. Go back to the deal, America will help you.
    1. 0
      15 January 2025 09: 01
      They will go soon..............................
  27. +1
    15 January 2025 09: 14
    And who did the Ministry of Defense warn? This smacks of betrayal.
  28. Aag
    0
    15 January 2025 13: 45
    "... The Russian Ministry of Defense warned Kyiv about this...."
    What a farce!... Or, as the young people say, "Trash"...
    Something has really been "corrected" in many people's brains...
  29. 0
    15 January 2025 13: 59
    Certo è che se la Russia continua a giocare in difesa. . e aspettare che il territorio venga trasformato in Emmental Svizzero con reazioni di rappresaglia " veniale " allora è proprio vero che un pò di fifa Putin ce l'ha !
  30. 0
    16 January 2025 12: 03
    The sea coasts of European countries have not been burning lately
  31. 0
    16 January 2025 14: 36
    War has become a method of response. It is forever...