How Goering Seized Power Over the German Economy

11 524 33
How Goering Seized Power Over the German Economy

В stories There is a curious moment of the Third Reich that has not yet received a clear explanation. How did the Nazis gain complete control over the German economy? The fact is that in Germany there was no total nationalization of industry; private enterprises, structures and legislation of the private economy were preserved there. But at the same time, as is clearly seen, Germany in the last pre-war years and during the war, at least until the beginning of Bombenkrieg, generally acted as a single whole, including in the economy.

At the same time, there is an opinion, often presented as something that requires no proof, that there was no special centralization in Nazi Germany, if you don’t count the Fuhrer, and that at the top there were party bigwigs who fought among themselves for power and influence. Well, maybe there really was a struggle at the top, but the question remains: so how exactly did the Nazis control the entire German economy? By force of law? By force? Or were all, or most, Germans so converted to the Nazi faith that they zealously carried out any orders?



I have my own version, somewhat extravagant, but I think it allows us to understand what this control was based on.

Prices can't be raised! But some can


On October 18, 1936, Hitler issued a decree appointing Goering as the Plenipotentiary for the Four-Year Plan, with the right to issue instructions and orders, including to the highest state bodies. Goering was the Minister-President of Prussia, he had an apparatus from which he separated a group of employees headed by his personal secretary Paul Körner as the Office for the Four-Year Plan.

And no one asked how such a non-departmental and non-governmental body could manage the economy in principle. Apparently, the reference to Hitler's decree removed all doubts.

But there was still a question that bothered many rulers and administrators. On paper, you could decree anything. But what real powers would this body have? Why should anyone pay any attention to it and its instructions? There was the Reich Ministry of Economics, headed by Hjalmar Schacht, which had similar functions and which had established connections with industrial circles and certain agreements regarding cooperation and mutual understanding.

At the time of the creation of the new management post, Goering already had an ace up his sleeve, the use of which he most likely discussed with Hitler in advance.


Hitler and Goering are up to something

On 26 October 1936, Göring, as the Commissioner for the Four-Year Plan, issued a law establishing the post of Reich Commissioner for Prices (der Reichskommissar für die Preisbildung) with powers to control prices and wages throughout the German economy. The Reich Commissioner for Prices was subordinate to Göring. On 29 October 1936, the post was taken over by the Oberpresident of the two Prussian provinces of Lower Silesia and Upper Silesia, Josef Wagner.

It is believed that when Schacht learned about this law, he laughed for a long time. The new body was taking on an impossible job and was bound to drown in endless bureaucratic correspondence. It was almost impossible to control prices; thousands of prices were set daily in Germany. There was no way to control and prescribe all this. Therefore, as Schacht believed, Goering and his subordinates would now get bogged down in bureaucracy, break the pricing mechanism with their interference and discredit themselves.

But Goering had an original plan. A month after the new price control office was created, on November 26, 1936, Goering issued a directive in which, at the suggestion of the Reich Commissioner for Price Setting, he repealed all regulations and decrees in force at that time concerning pricing. On the same day, Goering issued another directive, this time prohibiting price increases. This directive categorically prohibited, under threat of a fine or imprisonment, raising prices above the level of October 18, 1936. However, according to the same directive, the Reich Commissioner for Price Setting could make exceptions if they were dictated by urgent economic necessity.

That's all!

Goering made the Reich Commissioner for Price Setting a permitting authority. Every entrepreneur, every trader who needed to raise prices above the permitted level had to apply to this department and prove the need to make an exception for him. This opened up the broadest possibilities for manipulating the entire economy as a whole and individual industries in particular, almost without resorting to formal orders. Entrepreneurs flocked to the representatives of the Reich Commissioner for Price Setting, while Goering's apparatus decided who would be granted an exception and allowed to raise prices for their products, and who would not, issuing the corresponding instructions.

I think it is now clear why Goering became as rich as Croesus and had handfuls of precious stones.

The Battle for the "Commanding Heights"


After this, Schacht realized that Goering had completely outplayed him, because under such a system, entrepreneurs, from small shopkeepers to Krupp and Thyssen, would go to Goering's Reich Commissioner whenever they felt like raising their prices. This would happen periodically, since world prices would change and rise, so industries dependent on imported raw materials would experience difficulties. Moreover, this Reich Commissioner would interfere with the work of the inspection and control institutions of the Reich Ministry of Economics itself, if only because they had to be informed about exceptions in the procedure for setting prices. And so it began to happen.


Schacht and Goering are sitting next to each other and applauding something.

It must be said that such a method would only work in Germany and on the German mentality, which combined law-abidingness and thrift. When goods are sold at a higher price than the permitted level, many Germans will be indignant and demand the return of the previous prices. The price-setting system will have many millions of voluntary assistants who will report to the appropriate authorities if a shopkeeper, store or enterprise that has raised prices does not have permission from the Reich Commissioner for Price Setting.

This order lasted until about the summer of 1944, when defeats at the front and massive bombing raids radically undermined German order and the German economy, and the black market broke free from restrictions, because “necessity knows no commandments.”

But then, at the end of 1936, the price control system quickly came into being and began to function. Schacht, however, decided to rebel. Traces of it have been preserved in document 376-EC, published in the collection of documents from the Nuremberg Trials. On December 11, 1936, Schacht wrote a circular letter to the supervisory authorities, in which he stated that they were to act only according to his instructions. The instructions received from the commissioner for the four-year plan, the groups subordinate to him, and the Reich commissioner for price fixing were to be followed only if they corresponded to the instructions given by Schacht and the previously approved guidelines. In all other cases, he was to be immediately informed, even about individual attempts at outside interference in the work.

Less than a week after this circular, on December 17, 1936, Goering held a meeting of about one hundred leading industrialists in Berlin, to whom he delivered a speech on the principles of a new economic policy within the framework of the four-year plan. This speech is known from a transcript, partly verbatim and partly in summary, which was published in English translation in the Nuremberg Trials (document NI-051).

First of all, Goering emphasized:

"I am invested with the full confidence of the Führer and with far-reaching powers of decision. I am the master of German money, but unfortunately I cannot say the same about foreign currency."

A very significant statement.


A little time passed. In February 1937, Reich Minister of War Werner von Blomberg wrote to Hitler that Schacht was not doing any military-economic work and asked him to resolve this situation. And this despite the fact that on January 22, 1937, on his 60th birthday, Schacht was congratulated by the military command, and on January 30, 1937, on the anniversary of his rise to power, Hitler awarded Schacht a gold NSDAP badge.

Something knocked Schacht off his game, so much so that he acknowledged Goering's leadership. In April 1937, Schacht wrote him a long letter asking him to help develop German exports. Formally, Goering and Schacht signed an agreement on cooperation in the military-economic sphere in July 1937. But it did not last long. On September 5, 1937, Schacht went on vacation, and then he was asked to leave the ministry. On November 26, 1937, Walther Funk became Reich Minister of Economics. Soon, Schacht was asked to leave his post as president of the Reichsbank.

Thus, subsequent events show that at the end of December 1937, when Goering proclaimed himself “master of German money,” he had already won this battle for the “commanding heights” in the German economy.

It is difficult to say for sure what happened there. One can assume something like the following. Goering, faced with open resistance from Schacht, apparently brought Himmler to the forefront with some compromising material. This compromising material was probably weighty enough for Schacht not only to shut up, but to break down and soon drop out of work. Somehow he was so influenced that even the gold party badge did not bring him joy.

Centralization of powers


This Reich Commissariat for Price Setting, subordinated to Goering, established real power over the German economy, and on a scale that no ruler in Germany had ever had before. The levers of control of the Reich Commissariat for Price Setting reached every smallest shop, store, craft establishment or farmstead. It was impossible to buy or sell anything, it was impossible to hire a worker without looking at the instructions of this Reich Commissariat.

For those who would like to spit on the law, the Nazis have already shown that it is better not to mess with their security forces, especially those subordinated personally to Himmler. The Dachau concentration camp had been operating since 1933, and many have already heard of it.

It was a turning point in history. There was no force left in Germany that could either stop Hitler and Goering from carrying out their plans or thwart them. All of Germany was at their disposal.

Is this centralization or not? In my opinion, it is centralization. Just of an unfamiliar type. It can be called centralization of powers, when the Fuhrer, concentrating the highest political power in his hands, grants some person the powers to resolve this or that issue. This person, in our case Goering, formalizes his powers as it suits him, and all other ministries and departments are forced to obey him.

Moreover, all this is not based on informal relations, but all according to the law. The decree of the Fuhrer - the order of Goering - the instructions and orders of lower-ranking authorized representatives. You just need to read the Reichsgesetzblatt more often on the relevant issues, fortunately it is now completely scanned and posted on the Internet.

33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    14 January 2025 08: 28
    There was also total centralization in the Reich economy.
    Everyone grew up forcibly syndicalized.
    All entrepreneurs had to become members of the relevant organization
    Etc.
  2. +1
    14 January 2025 08: 45
    It was a turning point in history. There was no force left in Germany that could either stop Hitler and Goering from carrying out their plans or thwart them. All of Germany was at their disposal.

    The turning point in history came in 1933 - the rise of the Nazis to power.

    Everything else is a derivative of this.
  3. +3
    14 January 2025 08: 50
    Goering was Hitler's closest comrade in the party, a participant in the "Beer Hall Putsch" and Hitler's official successor (until a certain time). In fact, he was the second person in the state.
    He didn’t even really need Himmler, he was well versed in special forces, he was the creator and first chief of the Gestapo.
    Naturally, Hitler entrusted the country's economy to him.
    1. +1
      15 January 2025 07: 18
      Let's be honest: there were no fools there. Downies couldn't handle it.
    2. 0
      15 January 2025 10: 51
      Quote: Arzt
      Goering was Hitler's closest comrade in the party, a participant in the "Beer Hall Putsch" and Hitler's official successor (until a certain time). In fact, he was the second person in the state.
      He didn’t even really need Himmler, he was well versed in special forces, he was the creator and first chief of the Gestapo.
      Naturally, Hitler entrusted the country's economy to him.

      Don't you think that in your post "the tail is wagging the dog"? Fascism is the extreme stage of development of Capitalism. Look at Dimitrov's definition. It's just that Marx didn't live long enough to call it "imperialism"... But let's look at the facts - who were the main beneficiaries of the creation of the Third Reich on the scale of continental Europe? Krupp, Ferdinand Porsche... And Siemens, at whose enterprises prisoners of the Death Camps worked, including in engineering positions (Soviet Russia trained many engineers)... Who not only were without a salary, but instead of sick leave, they could have been sent to the gas chamber - "behind the fence" (barbed wire) there is a line...
      Doesn't this sound familiar?
      And somehow I don't remember the Masters of Capital at the Nuremberg Trials! Only the figurehead chairmen, like in "The Twelve Chairs"...
      1. 0
        15 January 2025 12: 21
        Quote: Arzt
        Goering was Hitler's closest comrade in the party, a participant in the "Beer Hall Putsch" and Hitler's official successor (until a certain time). In fact, he was the second person in the state.
        He didn’t even really need Himmler, he was well versed in special forces, he was the creator and first chief of the Gestapo.
        Naturally, Hitler entrusted the country's economy to him.

        Don't you think that in your post "the tail is wagging the dog"? Fascism is the extreme stage of development of Capitalism. Look at Dimitrov's definition. It's just that Marx didn't live long enough to call it "imperialism"... But let's look at the facts - who were the main beneficiaries of the creation of the Third Reich on the scale of continental Europe? Krupp, Ferdinand Porsche... And Siemens, at whose enterprises prisoners of the Death Camps worked, including in engineering positions (Soviet Russia trained many engineers)... Who not only were without a salary, but instead of sick leave, they could have been sent to the gas chamber - "behind the fence" (barbed wire) there is a line...
        Doesn't this sound familiar?
        And somehow I don't remember the Masters of Capital at the Nuremberg Trials! Only the figurehead chairmen, like in "The Twelve Chairs"...

        Just one question for you. In which German enterprises did the main "capitalist" Adolf Hitler have shares or ownership interests? wink

        What do prisoners have to do with it at all, they have worked and continue to work everywhere. Sometimes for decades….
        1. 0
          15 January 2025 13: 55
          Quote: Arzt
          Just one question for you. In which German enterprises did the main "capitalist" Adolf Hitler have shares or ownership interests?

          And where did you get the idea that Adolf Hitler is the "chief capitalist"? Did you completely misunderstand my post about "tail and dog"? Do you not understand the difference between the Masters and the "managing managers"?
          Quote: Arzt
          What do prisoners have to do with it at all, they have worked and continue to work everywhere. Sometimes for decades….

          Not just prisoners, but prisoners of the Death Camps! Very much so! Who was convicted of war crimes? The owners of Capital? Or "effective managers"?
          1. +1
            15 January 2025 14: 54

            And where did you get the idea that Adolf Hitler is the "chief capitalist"? Did you completely misunderstand my post about "tail and dog"? Do you not understand the difference between the Masters and the "managing managers"?

            Aaaa, you think Hitler was Fritz Thyssen's "managing manager"? laughing
            Read the biography of the latter.
            Yes, he sponsored Hitler's rise to power, even dictated a book, "I financed Hitler." And he was even appointed by the same Goering as a lifelong member of the Prussian State Council and a member of the Reichstag from the NSDAP.

            BUT.
            As soon as he meowed something against Adolf's policy....
            Sachsenhausen, Buchenwald, Dachau....
            Survived, by the way, despite the death camps. But you must admit, managers don't treat their owners like that. laughing

            There, everyone danced to Hitler's tune, including bankers and industrialists. It couldn't have been any other way in the Third Reich. angry
            1. 0
              15 January 2025 16: 30
              Quote: Arzt
              There, everyone danced to Hitler's tune, including bankers and industrialists. It couldn't have been any other way in the Third Reich.

              Yes, of course! And now in the US, for example, everyone dances to Biden's tune? Both industrialists and bankers? laughing
              Capital created the picture it needed for you! And put scapegoats in the dock at Nuremberg, not the Owners! The Owners are not subject to trial! Opel was the property of American shareholders before the war, and it remains so to this day... and it produced military products throughout the war. Do you really believe that a bunch of socialists who gathered in a beer hall are capable of creating the Third Reich on their knees?
              I repeat:
              Fascism is an open terrorist dictatorship of the most reactionary, most chauvinistic, most imperialist elements of financial capital ...
              Fascism is not superclass power and not the power of the petty bourgeoisie or the lumpen proletariat over financial capital.
              Fascism is the power of finance capital itself. This is the organization of terrorist reprisals against the working class and the revolutionary part of the peasantry and intelligentsia.
              (C)
              Quote: Arzt
              BUT.
              As soon as he meowed something against Adolf's policy....
              Sachsenhausen, Buchenwald, Dachau....
              Survived, by the way, despite the death camps. But you must admit, managers don't treat their owners like that.

              laughing A unique person - a man who went through, in sequence: Sachsenhausen, Buchenwald, the prison in Regensburg and Dachau (!!!) and died at the age of 77 from a heart attack in the estate of his son-in-law in Argentina! A real prisoner of fascism! Don't you find it funny?
              1. 0
                15 January 2025 17: 03
                Yes, of course! And now in the US, for example, everyone dances to Biden's tune? Both industrialists and bankers? laughing

                In the USA, it is precisely the power of money. The President there is a hired manager. The same Truman - twice on the cover of TIME, a retired colonel, a master of the Masonic lodge...
                It would seem that he should be a billionaire! Nothing of the sort, the law was changed specifically for him - the fee for former Presidents was doubled so that he would not die in poverty.
              2. 0
                15 January 2025 17: 04
                Capital created the picture it needed for you! And put scapegoats in the dock at Nuremberg, not the Owners! The Owners are not subject to trial! Opel was the property of American shareholders before the war, and it remains so to this day... and it produced military products throughout the war. Do you really believe that a bunch of socialists who gathered in a beer hall are capable of creating the Third Reich on their knees?

                The question is - where were these "masters" before Hitler? Why didn't they and Hindenburg go together? wink
              3. +1
                15 January 2025 17: 09
                Fascism is an open terrorist dictatorship of the most reactionary, most chauvinistic, most imperialist elements of financial capital ...
                Fascism is not superclass power and not the power of the petty bourgeoisie or the lumpen proletariat over financial capital.
                Fascism is the power of financial capital itself. It is the organization of terrorist reprisals against the working class and the revolutionary part of the peasantry and intelligentsia. (C)

                Well, that's the view of communist Dimitrov. But in reality, this same German working class, together with the peasantry and intelligentsia, reached Moscow with their sleeves rolled up, shouting "Heil". wink
              4. 0
                15 January 2025 17: 15
                laughing Unique - a man who went through, in sequence: Sachsenhausen, Buchenwald, the prison in Regensburg and Dachau (!!!) and died at the age of 77 from a heart attack in the estate of his son-in-law in Argentina! A real prisoner of fascism! Don't you find it funny?

                Yeah, 3 camps and at the same time the "master of Germany". laughing Although, if he was "in the law" wassat
                By the way, even in death camps, 3 out of 4 survived. This, of course, does not mean that there was a sanatorium there... love
  4. 0
    14 January 2025 18: 43
    Very interesting version, thank you!
  5. +2
    14 January 2025 20: 44
    I received information that Schacht's relatives were connected with the "Bella Lily"*(?) anti-fascist organization of the early 30s. And Schacht himself hardly hid his irony towards Hitler. Himmler could have found out about this and blackmailed Schacht.
    1. -1
      14 January 2025 21: 51
      I have a different version. The Versailles powers lubricated the mine before Hitler came to power to support the reparations payments.
      Here are copies of receipts for transfers to Schacht's personal account that could have completely destroyed his reputation if they had been published. If so, then Hitler simply summoned Schacht to a meeting in the presence of Goering, showed him the folder with receipts and said, pointing to Goering: "Here is your boss."
      1. +1
        15 January 2025 07: 30
        "copies of receipts" - in fact, Shakhta was too smart and careful to "leave such incriminating evidence on the windowsill."
        If such receipts had fallen into the hands of the Fuhrer, Schacht would have been in trouble: he would not have been dragged into the Gestapo. A high-flying bird. They would have arranged an "accident" for him.
        The Abwehr and SD were very good at doing this.
        1. 0
          15 January 2025 11: 17
          He was careful. Well, Himmler's agents will also crawl into any crack without soap.
          I believe that Hitler either knew or guessed that Schacht was like that even before coming to power. And he used him for disinformation purposes.
          Apparently, Hitler had some plans for Schacht, in which he was needed more alive than dead, and the folder was needed to finally turn him into a puppet. Based on the observed events, this seems to be so. We don't know what was swarming in Hitler's head, and he didn't like to write it down.
      2. -1
        15 January 2025 09: 23
        Quote: wehr
        I have a different version. The Versailles powers lubricated the mine before Hitler came to power to support the reparations payments.
        Here are copies of receipts for transfers to Schacht's personal account that could have completely destroyed his reputation if they had been published. If so, then Hitler simply summoned Schacht to a meeting in the presence of Goering, showed him the folder with receipts and said, pointing to Goering: "Here is your boss."

        Everything could have been much simpler - the "men in black" came in politely and said "This is our cow! And now we are milking it!" ©
        Where would he have gone - given the circumstances of that time - "crystal" and "night of the long knives"??!!
      3. 0
        15 January 2025 15: 55
        I have a different version. The Versailles powers lubricated the mine before Hitler came to power to support the reparations payments.
        Here are copies of receipts for transfers to Schacht's personal account that could have completely destroyed his reputation if they had been published. If so, then Hitler simply summoned Schacht to a meeting in the presence of Goering, showed him the folder with receipts and said, pointing to Goering: "Here is your boss."

        Dmitry, no offense, you are just a young man, born and raised in the era of the power of businessmen and think in terms of a capitalist society.

        I would like to see at least some “shadow businessman” on a regional scale who would risk “presenting” something to the First Secretary of the regional committee of the CPSU. laughing
        It took the Bolsheviks just a couple of years to deal with all the "businessmen".

        1. 0
          15 January 2025 19: 41
          I believe that you have a poor understanding of the realities of Germany at that time.
          Reparations were a highly charged political issue. Schacht relied on the support of British and American bankers.
          1. 0
            15 January 2025 19: 48
            I believe that you have a poor understanding of the realities of Germany at that time.
            Reparations were a highly charged political issue. Schacht relied on the support of British and American bankers.

            There were. But why would Hitler look at any receipts? If someone needs to be sent to a concentration camp, it is enough to measure the skull. feel
            1. 0
              15 January 2025 20: 27
              Schacht was too good an asset to be destroyed. Hitler had some plans for him that we can only guess about now.
    2. 0
      15 January 2025 07: 35
      "SHACHT's relatives" there is information about this in the memoirs of SHACHT himself.
      Gestapo documents have been preserved
  6. 0
    15 January 2025 05: 32
    I thank the author for an interesting article. hi
    Commendable work.
  7. +1
    15 January 2025 07: 36
    And where did Albert Speer, the Minister of Armaments and War Industry, the de facto head of the military economy and industry of the 3rd Reich, go?
  8. 0
    17 January 2025 17: 54
    Dmitry, thank you for the presented and substantiated material about how the Nazis gained complete control over the German economy, and the impossible becomes feasible, and individuals, albeit negative, are capable of making history, as in the example of Goering. Dmitry, although this is not on topic, I have recently been interested in a certain question, if you are interested in studying, digging in the archives, about one event in the history of Russia, I will be very grateful. The introduction of *serfdom * by Boris Godunov during the reign of Fyodor Ivanovich was a forced and necessary measure. But the mechanisms occurring in the society of that time that led to this event are incomprehensible to me. Namely, where did the communal lands in the villages go, and did they become lordly, because there was no feudal revolution, no nationalization of land, everything happened naturally? And where did the lords and feudal lords come from, since at that time they got by just fine with the militia? What happened to the family communities in the village, and what caused their disappearance? What is the price of the community spirit in the village, if the communities could not decide anything? How did the lumpen of that time, the so-called *fire victims*, appear, and as a mass phenomenon? And maybe somewhere in Tsarist Russia, in addition to the northern territories, villages with family communities free from serfdom were preserved?
    1. 0
      17 January 2025 19: 27
      Good question.
      I have already touched on it in one of my books devoted to natural disasters, but I can go into more depth. This will take some time.
    2. 0
      18 January 2025 07: 32
      Dmitry, thank you for your response, I will wait with impatience.
  9. 0
    18 January 2025 06: 55
    I am the owner of German money, but unfortunately I cannot say the same about foreign currency."

    Key moment.
    Multicurrency business should be under special control. Or closed.
    This is still relevant today as a threat to the state.
    Remember how the Turks' lira collapsed overnight! Did their GDP fall by half overnight?
    Or the "wagging" of our "ATMs" explaining that "a weak ruble is beneficial for Russia"!
  10. 0
    11 March 2025 21: 42
    No matter what anyone writes here, Schacht went home to have tea with his old lady, he was acquitted in Nuremberg
    and they didn't even give me a prison sentence
  11. -1
    11 March 2025 22: 24
    A concentration camp used skillfully and in time is capable, as both our and German experience shows, of solving many problems. Not all. Not forever. (And what solves everything and forever?).
    But for this we need - what? That's right! A decisive and patriotically minded leadership.
    However, why are you talking nonsense? You voted for THIS, didn't you?
  12. 0
    3 July 2025 06: 23
    It must be said that such a method would only work in Germany and on the German mentality, which combined law-abidingness and thrift. When goods are sold at a higher price than the permitted level, many Germans will be indignant and demand the return of the previous prices. The price-setting system will have many millions of voluntary assistants who will report to the appropriate authorities if a shopkeeper, store or enterprise that has raised prices does not have permission from the Reich Commissioner for Price Setting.
    A highly disciplined and cultured race, huh? The situation of the workers worsened, at first all the indignation was transferred to the now God-chosen people and also the gypsies. Then they unleashed the war, but economically it became total for Germany itself in 1943, before that they had produced a lot of consumer goods. Fascism drove a large number of people from the captured territories, in fact slaves.