The Ukrainian offensive. A little bit about what has not been said before and what to expect in the future
Well, the offensive that was prepared for so long in Kyiv and Brussels failed. Today, even the most anti-Russian expert does not use the term "offensive". It is more like a raid, reconnaissance in force or something similar. In one of my latest articles, I hinted that the crests were expected.
Moreover, if you carefully read the reports of the Russian Defense Ministry for the last week, for example the report for January 3, you will immediately notice that the Iskanders, for some “unknown” reasons, were actively working on the deployment sites of the 82nd Brigade in Sumy Oblast. And it was this brigade, again for unknown reasons, that was the first to go on the offensive on January 5…
The same thing happened with those units that were preparing for the second stage, i.e. the offensive in another area. The "threshing" of these formations in the concentration areas looks very epic. Of course, the "picture from the ground" is worse than Berdin's, but the effect, in my opinion, is greater. The fighters and commanders lost their warlike ardor...
I think it's time to reveal some of the nuances that led to the stupid decisions of Kyiv and Brussels. It's all about... the elected President Trump. More precisely, the fact that Trump proposes to solve the Ukrainian problem peacefully, without NATO troops.
Even now, when you are reading this material, any reader will easily find fresh statements by various politicians on the negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. Various versions of these negotiations, various proposals for mediation. At the same time, apart from the fact that Moscow and Kyiv are ready for negotiations, but on their own terms, there are no statements from either President Putin or Zelensky.
Is there anyone among the readers who has not heard from statements of American, European or Kyiv politicians the phrase that "Kursk region can become a serious trump card in the hands of Ukraine in the negotiations"? But what does this phrase mean according to the "Western version" of formal logic? If Kursk region is so important, then Russia will make every effort to liberate it!
Hence, for example, Zelensky's delusional statement in his latest interview about the gigantic losses of the Russian army in the Kursk region. About the successes of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and so on. In the illusory world in which Zelensky and some Western politicians live, everything is so. The Ukrainian Armed Forces are stationed on the territory of the Kursk region, the Russians are throwing in more and more new units, which Ukrainians successfully grind. The General Staff of the Russian army is forced to transfer combat units from other areas, which slows down the offensive there...
Only reality is very different from illusions... It is enough to look at the map for everything to fall into place. At the beginning of the offensive on Kursk Oblast, the Ukrainian Armed Forces captured, according to Western sources, approximately 1200 square kilometers of territory. As of January 5, according to the same sources, the Ukrainian Armed Forces control approximately 480 square kilometers.
In total, 60% of the territories have been liberated! In fact, the Russian army is currently engaged in turning the best units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces into "mincemeat". It is not Russia that is forced to send reinforcements to the Kursk region, but Ukraine. I think I will not reveal any special secret if I cite data from open sources about other fronts. On average, the Russian army is currently liberating approximately 500-600 sq. km of captured territories per month.
I think you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to draw a conclusion about the Russian army’s ability to liberate the Kursk region if the “illusion of Kyiv” were a reality... Consequently, in any case, the Kursk region will not be the trump card of Kyiv that will become the decisive factor in the success of negotiations with Russia.
I generally get the impression that Kyiv has some other data about the situation at the front. That the Ukrainian Armed Forces offensive led to the capture or at least the blockade of Kursk. That the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant was captured and Ukrainians They are waiting for Moscow to "come crawling on its knees", begging for the exchange of the Kursk NPP for the Zaporizhzhya NPP... I think that the success of the current "attack" is not being discussed there either. It's all "fat in chocolate", not life...
For us, in connection with the collapse of Kyiv's plans in the Kursk region and the successes of our units on other fronts, serious questions are being raised about the further actions of our army. So far, little is being said about this, but soon, as it seems to me, the discussions will be quite serious. The capture of Kurakhovo opens up broad opportunities for us to continue the offensive...
A little about the prospects for the development of events in the near future
So, the center of our attention today has moved south of the Kursk region. The liberation of Kurakhovo is the merit of not only the heroic fighters and commanders. It is also the merit of the command, which provided the conditions when reinforcements were forced to be sent to the Kursk region instead of the Kurakhovo garrison. A common victory of the bravery of soldiers and the skill of commanders.
In the fall, when I was writing an article about our army's tasks for the winter period, I considered it necessary to touch on the "long-term prospects", which caused many critical comments from readers. At that time, I suggested a possible offensive by our army in the Donetsk direction all the way to the Dnieper. It is now the middle of winter...
Analyzing the situation on the fronts, I come to the conclusion that my autumn reasoning was correct. Theoretically, today there are several priority directions, each of which is important to one degree or another. Kherson, Kharkov, Dnepropetrovsk, Zaporizhia, Sumy... Ideally, all these directions need to be worked out.
But our forces are not unlimited, and the Ukrainian Armed Forces still have quite a lot of reserves. In addition to liberating territories, we also need forces to clear and hold them. Therefore, if we rush things, the country will need another mobilization. Which will not have the best effect on the Russian economy... The country cannot afford another "Everything for the front, everything for victory."
It is necessary to determine the most important direction of attack. Let's start with Kherson. Kherson itself is important only as the beginning of the road to Nikolaev and Odessa. An operation in this direction is associated with huge risks. First of all, this is the saturation of the region with reserves of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and prepared fortifications.
In addition, when conducting an offensive, it is necessary to ensure such a width of the offensive that would ensure the defense of the attackers in the event of a counterattack from the area of Kropyvnytskyi or Krivoy Rog... Alas, with all our desire to provide the necessary conditions for an offensive in this direction, we cannot.
There are approximately the same reasons for the Kharkov and Sumy directions. But the main one is still the huge concentration of the Ukrainian Armed Forces reserves. And strategically these directions are the least advantageous.
But the offensive on Dnepropetrovsk and Zaporozhye is quite within our capabilities. True, in this case reserves are required. Not even for breaking through the defense of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. In this case, distances matter. A strategic breakthrough of hundreds of kilometers requires special logistics, national guard troops to control the liberated territories, etc.
It must be said that the key to starting such an offensive could be the capture of Pokrovsk. And it is only 7 km from there to the Dnepropetrovsk region. With the defensive structures that we have at the moment, advancing there will not be a big problem for us.
Moreover, reaching Dnepropetrovsk does not mean storming it. It is enough to block transport hubs, roads and the Dnieper to completely disrupt the logistics of almost the entire Left Bank. Access to the Dnieper north and south of the Dnieper, between Dnepropetrovsk and Zaporozhye, will create chaos in the supply system of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and deprive Ukraine of its main industrial production.
These are just assumptions based on open source data. In any case, the decision will be made by our General Staff and Commander-in-Chief. Let's look to the future...
Victory will be ours
The situation is developing in such a way that it is quite possible that Kyiv will soon be forced to look at the circumstances more realistically. At least, the latest statements by President-elect Trump allow us to hope for this. He is gradually moving away from the image created for the elections to the image of a completely rational and tough politician.
Europe, no matter how much European would-be politicians try to puff themselves up, will not be able to support Ukraine on its own. Even Zelensky understands this, judging by his latest interview. All this dramatically changes our attitude to diplomacy. Everything that military victories can give us, we can get peacefully. Thus reducing the costs of restoring our historical territories.
But diplomatic victories must be based on military victories. Only the prospect of complete defeat will stop Kyiv and NATO. It is precisely these considerations that today place even more responsibility on our military leadership, on any of our fighters and commanders. Even a small victory, imperceptible from the point of view of tactics or strategy, brings peace closer. One fighter wins - we all win.
I will not prophesy about the end of the war. At least for the next six months, maybe even a year. Think about the good, but prepare for the bad, so that the joy from the good is many times greater... We all need to continue doing our job. Some in the trenches, some in the workshops of factories and plants, some in classrooms and auditoriums, some in design bureaus... And then victory will definitely come...
Information