Germany's Ferrous Metallurgy: How Goering Cleverly Played Poor

16
Germany's Ferrous Metallurgy: How Goering Cleverly Played Poor

Military-economic story Germany during the Second World War, despite a mountain of books, has been studied so poorly that it periodically presents surprises. Somehow, the opinion was formed that Germany lacked raw materials, currency for purchases, so much so that the Nazis began to develop poor and difficult to process German iron ores. Various conclusions are drawn from this.

In 2016, Michael Barnscheidt defended his dissertation at the University of Düsseldorf on Germany’s foreign trade in rolled metal products from 1914 to 1945. He did not make any outstanding generalizations, but simply collected and systematized statistics scattered across hard-to-reach sources.



And what he achieved is amazing.

Disinformation with life-size scenery


It turns out that all that time, before and during the war, Germany actively traded rolled metal products: blanks, beams, railway material, wire. Moreover, it sold much more than it bought.

For example, in 1933, steel production in Germany was 7,3 million tons, and export of rolled steel was 1,4 million tons or 23,2% of production. Then, despite all the speeches of Hitler and Goering, export growth continued, although its share decreased somewhat due to the growth of production. In 1936, export was 2,8 million tons or 15,1% of production, in 1937 - 2,89 million tons, also 15,1% of production. In 1938, export decreased slightly to 2,1 million tons or 9,3%, and production jumped to 22,4 million tons against 19,1 million tons in 1937.


All this happened, let us note, in the era of the Four-Year Plan and the foundation of the first metallurgical plant of the Hermann Göring concern in Salzgitter. How are we told? Hitler demanded that all efforts be made to prepare Germany for war, and this was the task of the Four-Year Plan. But it turns out that German industrialists are exporting rolled metal instead of turning it into weapons and shells. Thus, statistics show us that everything was not quite as they say.

Looking at all this with amazement, I came to the conclusion that the four-year plan for the development of German ore mining had a dual nature. On the one hand, it was a grandiose disinformation campaign with life-size decorations. Hitler had to hide his plans and do it as convincingly as possible. Apparently, the stake was initially made on the seizure of iron ore deposits, but before the war these aspirations could not be shown.

So Goering got busy with the show. They started a quarrel in industrial circles, artificially contrasting German ore with imported ore, although in fact German ore had long been mined and added to the charge, and no one was embarrassed by this. Then, with pomp and advertising, they began to build a giant plant in Salzgitter: 32 blast furnaces for 4 million tons of pig iron per year. It was never completed, and with the beginning of the war, they actually abandoned construction.


Even what was built is impressive. A photo of the Salzgitter plant in May 1945

What conclusion should the intelligence officers and analysts have drawn at that very moment? That Germany was trying to adapt to its semi-isolation and was unlikely to plan anything serious in the near future. That was the goal of the disinformation. Goering cleverly and convincingly played the poor guy.

On the other hand, the mine and the plant in Salzgitter, as well as the mines elsewhere, did have a practical side. They were a reserve for the worst case scenario and were indeed useful when the war began. In the winter months of 1939/40, the import of iron ore to Germany almost ceased, not only because of the fighting, but also because of the harsh winter, when the waters of the ports, rivers and canals froze.


In Germany, ore and coal were often transported by barge along rivers and canals, and large industrial cities such as Duisburg had large river ports.

In the spring of 1940, German ore made up about half of the raw material for smelting iron. Then the Germans defeated France, and the need for it disappeared. Nevertheless, German ore allowed us to survive this peak moment.

The disinformation, created on such a scale that an entire metallurgical plant was built, was certainly successful. I would even say it was too successful, since post-war researchers of the history and economy of Nazi Germany reasoned in the vein set by Hitler and Goering, apparently not really realizing that they were being duped.


The famous photo of the start of construction of the Salzgitter plant in 1938. The main thing is a good shot

Excess steel


Both the Nazi leadership and German industrialists were betting on imported ore and, accordingly, on its capture during the planned war. Industrialists - because of the profit. For example, in 1936, a ton of iron ore was purchased by German factories at 9,11 Reichsmarks per ton. With a content of 62%, a ton of iron in the ore cost 8,9 Reichsmarks. At the same time, beams were sold at 99 Reichsmarks per ton, and semi-finished products - at 78 Reichsmarks per ton. Now, of course, it is difficult to make an exact calculation of the cost of converting ore into cast iron, cast iron into steel, and steel into rolled steel at German factories, but "by eye" we can say that they raised 15-20 Reichsmarks per ton of net profit. So it was profitable to process imported iron ore into export rolled metal products.

But the war began, the needs of military production arose, and then the export should have stopped. But no, the export continued. Moreover, during the war it grew and soon overtook the pre-war figures, especially in the middle of the war.

1939 - 1981,2 thousand tons,
1940 - 1393,4 thousand tons,
1941 - 2391,4 thousand tons,
1942 - 3277,9 thousand tons,
1943 - 2334,8 thousand tons.

Amazing! In 1942, during the heavy fighting, Germany had 3,2 million tons of finished rolled steel, which was not used for military production, but was exported. And where? For example, 73% of semi-finished products went to Italy, 37% of railway materials - to Romania. This, by the way, is 80,2 thousand tons, which made it possible to build 72 thousand km of tracks in single-track calculation. Sheets and wire went to the Netherlands (21%), France (14%), Sweden (12%) and so on. But slabs and ingots, of which 1942 thousand tons were exported in 1212,7, 28% went to France, 12% to the Netherlands, 10% to Italy and 9% to Sweden. France consumed 1942 thousand tons of German slabs and ingots in 339,5. And so on.

In 1943, a total of 34,6 million tons of steel were smelted in Germany, including the occupied territories, of which 2,3 million tons were exported, or 6,6% of the smelting. As a comparison, this export of metal was equivalent to the production of 155,6 million pieces of 10,5 cm FH Gr.38 howitzer high-explosive fragmentation shells. And in general, a lot of weapons and ammunition could have been made from this metal.

Statistics lead to an interesting and unexpected conclusion. Before and during the war, at least until the Americans bombed the steel plants, Germany had an excess resource of steel. Steel was exported to occupied and dependent countries, essentially exchanging it for resources more needed for the military economy. In addition, statistical analysis suggests that even before the war, the Germans created hidden reserves of metal in rolled products, blanks, and semi-finished products, because many millions of tons of steel disappeared somewhere, without reaching the point of being processed into rolled products.


The ruins of the Krupp steelworks in 1945

If this is so, then some circumstances become clear. Such as the cool attitude of the Germans to the restoration of the captured Donbass. Our experience of restoration work has shown that even a heavily damaged metallurgical plant can be brought to the start of smelting in just 3-4 months. The Germans could have done this too. It seemed a mystery why they didn’t. It seems now, in light of the discovered data, that they didn’t really want it and didn’t really need it. The atmosphere of the summer-fall of 1942 for the Germans: the Bolsheviks are fleeing to the Volga and the Caucasus, victory is just around the corner, the Reich’s factories are smelting so much that more than 3 million tons of steel are sold abroad. Why bother with destroyed metallurgical plants? This will be done sometime later. True, this “later” never came due to the abrupt change in the situation in 1943.

So when Goering or German generals play the poor guy and claim they didn't have this or that, it should be treated with caution because it could be disinformation.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    9 January 2025 06: 06
    Thank you! Interesting point of view.
    But... This may be disinformation. But it may be a limited sample to obtain other results of comparison. Statistics is only a tool in the hands of economists, planners, and sometimes historians. Exports by country are indicated, export volumes are indicated. But there was also import from the same countries. Not being an expert, I will assume that chrome was brought from somewhere, oil from somewhere, food from somewhere. And somewhere fascist steel was used for the needs of the Reich itself, but outside of Germany.
    Whether the Nazi leadership of Germany was playing poor or really experiencing problems can only be understood by studying all the import and export contracts of that time. But this is unlikely. The volume is huge, and it is unlikely that all the data has been preserved. And it is unlikely that such a thing will be allowed to an independent (if such has been preserved) researcher.
    1. +2
      9 January 2025 06: 31
      Ordinary capitalism.
      I wouldn't be surprised if the metallurgists fulfilled the plan and quietly sold the rest abroad. lol
      The profit is quite substantial...
      1. +4
        9 January 2025 09: 40
        Again, they weren't selling because they had a good life. They were selling to get currency and buy something they needed, but that wasn't produced in Germany. So, there's no big secret here. And it's clear that no bourgeois would miss the opportunity to sell their goods "on the side" if the price was good.
    2. +5
      9 January 2025 08: 08
      Quote from Fangaro
      Was the Nazi leadership of Germany playing poor, or was it really experiencing problems?
      According to the memoirs of Grand Admiral Raeder, he always had a feud with the ground forces over which department would receive more metal, which was already becoming critically short. Unfinished ships were sitting in the shipyards only because of the steel shortage.
      1. +3
        9 January 2025 17: 21
        The Germans had problems with rare metals, tungsten. And for the production of armor, molybdenum and chromium. Therefore, there was a shortage of armor steel, especially since, as far as I remember, naval armor is of higher quality.
    3. +5
      9 January 2025 08: 52
      But it may be a limited sample. to obtain other comparison results. Statistics are just a tool in the hands of economists, planners, and sometimes historians.

      yes, that's exactly it...
      We have an expression: "...the average temperature in the hospital..." - this is also about how to use statistics for specific purposes...
  2. +12
    9 January 2025 07: 41
    Steel was not sent to occupied countries in exchange for anything, it was used to make military products there.
  3. +8
    9 January 2025 08: 55
    What an amazing thing! In 1942, during the heavy fighting, Germany had 3,2 million tons of finished rolled steel, which was not used for military production, but was exported. And where? For example, 73% of semi-finished products went to Italy, 37% of railway materials - to Romania
    .
    the reason for the surprise is unclear: the rental was supplied belligerents allies Germany and the occupied countries whose industry worked in the interests of Germany.

    Everything is logical.
  4. +3
    9 January 2025 09: 55
    Interesting facts are presented, but incorrect conclusions are made. In the production of weapons, first of all, qualified personnel and production equipment are needed - this is the main restraining factor.
    It is clear that deliveries to Sweden are payment for deliveries of ore. Deliveries to Italy objectively improved Italy's combat capability - everything is clear here too. In relation to the Netherlands and France, we need to look at the trade balances. It is not clear whether ore and semi-finished products were delivered from France?
    1. +8
      9 January 2025 10: 09
      Before jumping to conclusions, whether they are correct or not, you need to see whether they delivered or not. laughing
  5. +12
    9 January 2025 11: 32
    In the post-war years, the FRG performed its "economic miracle" in steel production. The Nazis had more than enough iron ore, and high-quality iron ore at that. And the capture of Luxembourg made these reserves redundant.
    There were problems with alloying additives. They are not needed for slabs and beams, but armor or shells cannot be obtained without them.
    That is, Goering was primarily interested not in low-carbon steel construction semi-finished products, but in high-quality alloy steel. Germany had problems with it.
    It is a mistake to think that the Germans were not interested in the industrial enterprises of Donbass and Krivbass. The delay in restoring iron ore mining was due to the fact that the surviving equipment was transported first of all to enterprises mining alloy metals. 40% of the manganese consumed by German industry in the second half of 1941 was mined in the occupied territories of Ukraine.
  6. +2
    9 January 2025 13: 04
    Interesting! This may explain the extremely careless attitude of German tank designers to the mass of tanks and self-propelled guns created during the war. It must be admitted that this is very uncharacteristic for the Germans.
    On the one hand, there was plenty of iron and there was no need to spare it, on the other hand, the lack of alloying elements with an excess of cast iron allowed us to hope for providing tolerable protection at least by the method: "whip it up with a sack of sand" wink".
    Thanks to the author for the interesting information.
    P.S. As for the fact that the fleet lacked iron, given the lack of, essentially, centralized management of the German economy and the cave-like level of intelligence of its top leadership, ambitions could well have played a decisive role in decision-making.
  7. +1
    9 January 2025 14: 36
    Michael Barnscheidt defended his dissertation at the University of Düsseldorf on Germany's foreign trade in rolled metal products from 1914 to 1945.
    Author, point me in the direction of where I can read this dissertation? The topic is too interesting for me...
    1. +1
      9 January 2025 15: 13
      Sent a link in a private message
  8. +1
    10 January 2025 10: 36
    But slabs and ingots, of which 1942 thousand tons were exported in 1212,7, 28% went to France, 12% to the Netherlands, 10% to Italy and 9% to Sweden. France consumed 1942 thousand tons of German slabs and ingots in 339,5. And so on.

    That's on the one hand. But on the other... as of 01.10.1942/XNUMX/XNUMX, the Reich placed military orders in European countries for the following amounts:
    France: 1,9 billion Reichsmarks
    Netherlands: 634 million Reichsmarks.
    General Government (Poland): 525 million Reichsmarks.
    Belgium: 484 million Reichsmarks.
    Denmark: 134 million Reichsmarks.

    © Müller-Hillebrand B. The German Army. 1933–1945.
    Airplanes, ships, cars, uniforms, sapper equipment, communications equipment, and ammunition were supplied to the Reich. So the "raw materials in exchange for goods" option is quite possible.
  9. 0
    11 January 2025 11: 08
    Rather, we are talking about the functioning of the economy of a Europe united by Hitler, which worked for the Third Reich.