Anchor and Fiber Optics: The Hijacking of the Eagle S Tanker

94
Anchor and Fiber Optics: The Hijacking of the Eagle S Tanker
Tanker Eagle S


A direct and obvious threat


These are all links in the same chain. More precisely, a program for transferring events from the fronts of a special operation to the world. The first peak occurred in 2022, when the Nord Streams were blown up - now we are witnessing the second phase. It can be called the stage of Russia's preparation for the peace talks of 2025. Developed communications and export transit routes most often pass in close proximity to NATO countries, which the enemy cannot fail to take advantage of. It is no coincidence that the escalation occurred in the middle of winter - the alternative Northern Sea Route is currently impassable for most ships. There are definitely not enough nuclear icebreakers for everyone. The infamous Ursa Major, which terrorists sank off the coast of Spain, once got very seriously stuck in the ice near the mouth of the Yenisei. The navigation period for such ships on the Northern Route is very short - from August to October. That is why the Big Dipper went to Vladivostok by the "southern route" through Gibraltar and the Suez Canal.




Tanker Eagle S was believed to be carrying Russian gasoline to Turkey

The second act of the play was not long in coming - on December 26, Finnish special forces landed on the tanker Eagle S, presumably carrying unleaded gasoline. The Western press immediately began talking about the capture of the vessel from the so-called "shadow fleet» Russia. Although according to the documents the tanker is registered in the Cook Islands, and belongs to the company Caravella LLC FZ from the United Arab Emirates. And technical management is carried out by the Indian company MarineTraffic. The gasoline poured into Tanks Eagle S, was destined for Turkey. In addition to the fact that the Finnish daredevils risked turning the tanker into a giant torch, they grossly violated maritime law by detaining it. However, who cares about this in the West now, if it concerns Russia. Strictly speaking, there is not much Russian there. The tanker, as you can see, is not ours at all, and even the captain of the vessel is a citizen of Georgia. The only Russian thing there is gasoline from the port of Ust-Luga, but that is just business and nothing personal.

The officially announced reason for the detention of Eagle S is the broken Estlink 2 cable (658 MW capacity), connecting Finland and Estonia. In addition, a break in a nearby fiber optic line is blamed. The accusation is simple to the point of outrageousness - allegedly the captain of the tanker deliberately dropped the anchor and dragged it along the bottom of the Baltic. Given the shallow depths, this led to damage to communication and energy lines between NATO countries. If Estlink 2 was really broken, then this is a serious accident that cannot be dealt with quickly. According to the most conservative estimates, repairs may drag on until August 2025. The Estlink 1 underwater line with a capacity of 358 MW remains in operation - if it is broken, then Estonia will have to look for electricity somewhere else. Maybe they will ask Zelensky. But in any case, electricity will definitely become more expensive for Estonians, while the Finns, on the contrary, will have a small surplus, and, accordingly, prices will decrease.

Development stories The tanker's detention is very similar to the script of a cheap Hollywood movie. Very conveniently, one of the three anchors is missing from the vessel. All interested parties immediately interpret this as direct evidence of the guilt of the Eagle S captain in disrupting the operation of the bottom communications. Although in reality this does not even qualify as circumstantial evidence. The Finns also announced the discovery of some devices on board for tracking NATO ships and even found an extra person not listed in the on-board documents.

Who is to blame and what to do?


NATO is seriously scared in the Baltic Sea. The Estonian Navy (there are some) has taken the remaining intact Estlink 1 under enhanced protection, and the alliance forces have promised to monitor the situation in the waters more closely. Even more ships and planes of the alliance will appear in the Baltic. It became really uneasy after the statement of the Baltic Minister of Foreign Affairs:

"If there is a threat to critical underwater infrastructure in our region, there will be a response."

The Europeans really have enough problems in the Baltic Sea. In 2024, bottom cables of various purposes were repeatedly cut by someone. In November, the BCS East West Interlink telecommunications cable and the C-Lion 1 fiber optic cable were disrupted. A year earlier, the gas pipeline between Finland and Estonia fell in an unequal battle with unknown parties. At the same time, the EE-S1 telecommunications cable suffered. A Chinese ship caught in a strong storm was found guilty.


But the broken Estlink 2 power line is nothing compared to the incidents described above. Fiber optic lines are restored relatively quickly, especially if the repair ships are not overloaded with work. But it is not so easy to restore the power line laid along the seabed - the repairs are planned to take 8-9 months.

Let's leave the games of the NATO team members aside and decide on two questions - who is to blame and what to do now? There are few options with the cut seabed cables. The Europeans are now trying to cheer up their own population, already tired of the conflict in Ukraine. Tired - it means that propaganda does not work. When the lights go out or, what is much worse, the Internet is cut off, then society will cry out. The Russians will naturally be named as the guilty ones. Isn't that a tasty reason to cut the threads on the seabed? As they say, the main thing for the Europeans in the investigation is not to get to themselves. Europe really does not like tankers with Russian oil passing a few miles from their borders. From the outside, this looks like a mockery from the Kremlin. Suppressing the traffic of Russian hydrocarbons through the Baltic is one of the possible goals of attacks on sea communications. Now NATO with a "clear conscience" can arrest ships, or even block shipping carried out in Russian interests. In any case, Europeans are the first beneficiaries of incidents in the Baltic Sea.

The second are Zelensky's henchmen and the expired president himself. The Banderites have skills in sabotage at sea, so it is not impossible for them to destroy objects on the bottom of the Baltic Sea. Especially such fragile ones as fiber optics and electric cables. It is possible that Zelensky organized sabotage in secret from his Western masters. Although collusion with individuals in Brussels is also possible. The goal is one - even more sanctions for Russia and escalation on the battlefield. The main thing is to stir up the nest, and Kyiv will react according to the situation.

Now, regarding the second task – what to do? No one is going to sink anything that approaches ships with Russian cargo without permission. Of course, some are expecting a world war, but it is still a long way off. But it is quite possible to provide ships with maritime security groups, as was the case in the Indian Ocean. A rhetorical question – how many machine gunners are needed to destroy a Finnish border guard helicopter? Domestic security companies have extensive experience in fighting Somali pirates. Are NATO invaders really more dangerous?


In order not to multiply deaths in the Baltic Sea, Russia can respond in kind. No one has cancelled the investigative actions within the framework of the investigation into the explosion of the Nord Streams. Why not detain a couple of Finnish ships until the circumstances are clarified?

At the end of the story, it is worth recalling the extremely extensive network of fiber optic lines around the world. Off the top of my head, it is about 1,4 million kilometers. Not all of them are as conveniently located as in the Baltic Sea, but they can be reached. This is worth remembering for Western leaders who sanction outright terrorism against Russian ships and communications. Patience is, of course, a good and respected thing, but not unlimited.
94 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    4 January 2025 04: 02
    Very conveniently, one of the ship's three anchors is missing

    Something I didn't quite understand about three anchors? This vessel is a sea vessel of non-mixed navigation. The third (stern) anchor is required only for mixed type vessels (river-sea) or river vessels. In the photo of the stern, there is also no anchor niche. I did not find under what class this vessel is located, therefore we proceed from the unified rules of IACS, and they no longer require a spare anchor on board for such vessels (earlier our Register required it). According to the photo, it does not have a left-hand anchor. Most likely, the boatswain was too lazy to tighten the anchor chain stopper, and fixed it with the band brake of the windlass. Well, then, according to the classics, the drum began to slip and the chain slowly wore out.
    1. +1
      6 January 2025 16: 18
      Quote: Coward
      The third (stern) anchor is required only for mixed type (river-sea) vessels or river vessels.

      Also for sea-going vessels entering the Great Lakes.

      It is quite possible that there is a spare anchor, and it is now in its regular place. Then the phrase from the article "one of the vessel's three anchors is missing" makes sense.
    2. +1
      6 January 2025 22: 20
      I didn't quite understand something about three anchors? This vessel is a sea vessel of non-mixed navigation.
      The main thing is to get it right. Like in that joke about the wolf, "Why aren't you wearing a hat?"
  2. +9
    4 January 2025 05: 04
    Patience is, of course, a good and respectable thing, but not unlimited.

    yes, it's limitless...like sufferers we endure everything...both spitting and kicks.
    1. +12
      4 January 2025 10: 49
      Three ha-ha-ha. Patience. For a small fraction of a penny, mother and father with the Fatherland were sold. From whom should we expect action? From traders, thieves? It was under I.V. Stalin that thieves asked to go to the front to atone for their guilt before the Motherland, and even then not all of them. And now they flee to Courchevel with stolen money with the permission of the roof.
    2. +4
      5 January 2025 15: 24
      Snot-nosed people cannot rule Russia. Simply categorically.
  3. +15
    4 January 2025 05: 27
    The Chinese bulk carrier, on which two fiber optic cables were hung in the Baltic, was kept by the Danes at anchor for a month. They did not prove anything and released it peacefully. With the so-called capture of the Eagle S, the captain stopped - it means he already agreed to the inspection. And do you know that he could have tested the training of the Finns, saying on air "guys, my ceremonial ladders do not work, they are under maintenance - only the storm ladder, from any side." Has anyone climbed the storm ladder without cargo on their back to a 2-5 meter side, I climbed twice - cursed everyone and everything. In the Norwegian zone, when they were hooliganism, they also had fun with the ladders in order to gain 7-5 minutes to completely remove the traces of the crime. And to trust the Finnish press is to disrespect yourself.
    1. +10
      4 January 2025 06: 00
      The traffic from our ports has not changed a single kopeck, we and our friends from our ports on the Baltic and from Murmansk past Norway and England. We continue to go as we always have. The West used something similar two years ago at the Strait of Malacca, blowing up a tanker of the Iranian shadow fleet, and it turns out that blowing it up is not very easy. So nothing has changed there either. Iran is doing great. And the oil and petroleum market immediately reacts to such shows - by raising prices.
    2. +2
      4 January 2025 07: 36
      A storm ladder is not needed to board a tanker. The tanker's cargo deck may be a meter from the water when loaded.
      1. +5
        4 January 2025 07: 42
        This is a river-sea for tankers. You saw the photo on the cover of the article - gasoline is lighter than oil, plus a meter of waterline. Full speed ahead on the storm ladder. The waves are not visible in the photo, but I assure you that you need to have the dexterity to climb onto the storm ladder without losing your feet, or even your legs up to your knees.
        1. +3
          4 January 2025 07: 45
          Believe me, I know what I'm talking about. I worked on tankers in the Far East. In PMP. Primorsky Shipping Company.
          1. +4
            4 January 2025 07: 58
            You worked on the Afromax and Suezmax tankers. I saw the Soviet tanker Kuzbass in the Kola Bay. The floating base "two-humped" of Polish construction was slightly higher than the tanker's gp (on the superstructures). The tanker Kuzbass was fully loaded. Should I post a photo of Rosneft and Lukoil tankers in the Kola Bay working as oil terminals for reloading oil to the West?
            1. 0
              5 January 2025 04: 19
              Is this the same "Kuzbass" that was filmed in movies back in the 70s?
          2. 0
            Yesterday, 23: 09
            Your memory has failed you. The freeboard of the Aframax in cargo is at least 7 meters.
    3. +4
      4 January 2025 07: 58
      Quote: tralflot1832
      "Boards". Has anyone climbed the storm ladder?

      They dropped troops from a helicopter
      1. +2
        4 January 2025 08: 05
        that's why they dropped it, if they had climbed up the storm ladder, there would have been a cool video picture of the receiving sailors. One of whom could have picked up a paratrooper's machine gun. There is one joke there - in order to roll onto the main landing gear through the storm ladder passing through the gunwale, you need to use two hands. wassat
    4. -1
      4 January 2025 11: 27
      And do you know that he could have tested the training of the Finns by saying on air, “Guys, my parade ladders aren’t working, they’re undergoing maintenance - only the storm ladder, from any side.”
      Well, there was a captain with a Georgian passport, so Genatsvale didn’t dare to take such actions.
      1. +3
        4 January 2025 11: 29
        Genatsvale decided, the Finns landed from a helicopter. Although he could have moved aside.
    5. The comment was deleted.
  4. +19
    4 January 2025 06: 11
    The capture of this vessel by the Finns, who kept a low profile and a low profile during the Soviet era, seems to hint at the authority and position of our country in the world community. We should also add to this the grunting of the three "great" Baltic republics, which are known only because they occupy some part of the world map. It's interesting, but if the Finns had suspected an American vessel, would they have captured it too? wink
    1. -1
      4 January 2025 10: 37
      What is the world community? Where did you get such idiotic terms? Why did you call the feudal lord of the USA the world community, and not a cur who uses a roof? Doesn't it sound so simple anymore?
      You liberals are just fascist psychos.
      1. +2
        4 January 2025 10: 48
        Quote: NG inform
        Why did you call the feudal lord of the USA the world community and not a cur?
        Because calling this structure a cur is not quite tolerant. Do you know what tolerance is? wink
        1. -1
          5 January 2025 15: 29
          the mockery is out of place. Or are you really a liberal?
      2. +6
        4 January 2025 14: 33
        No need for pathos and Lavrovism) And, probably, after all, "vassal of the USA", if we are talking about Finland. The world community exists, part of it is against Russia (very much so), another is hesitating, the third... and the third is Russia. We are not liberals, we are realists.
        1. -5
          4 January 2025 18: 44
          Aren't you crazy to speak out against Lavrov? Liberalism, as it is.
          1. 0
            4 January 2025 19: 05
            Handsome! Sergey Viktorovich, I was just kidding, but I respect you a lot, and they are idiots!
      3. -2
        4 January 2025 14: 38
        The USA is a republic, there are no feudal lords.
        1. +2
          4 January 2025 17: 36
          How much do you have to hate the Russian language to make 5 (five) mistakes in one line!
      4. +1
        7 January 2025 12: 01
        You liberals are just fascist psychos

        Don't splash the monitor with saliva
  5. +13
    4 January 2025 06: 38
    There was no seizure of the vessel. Did the captain of the tanker change the vessel's course and increase the speed? This is a usual routine, as the Americans like to say! Stop sowing panic based on publications in the Western media! And about the passage of the Big Dipper along the NSR - a passage in winter for a ship owner, by a single vessel, is extremely unprofitable. The Chinese have already calculated everything. An ice-class vessel ARK 4-7 spends $ 163 per day plus fuel on a passage accompanied by a nuclear icebreaker. In order for it to be economically profitable, there must be convoys of ships of 000-4 ships.
    1. -4
      4 January 2025 06: 43
      Why are you bothering the fire-fighters while they whine?
      1. +4
        4 January 2025 06: 54
        Sergey, I'm actually heating them up! We don't have any KDP authors or anyone familiar with Maritime Law on VO. I didn't expect such knowledge from you - are you by any chance a KDP? hi
        1. +6
          4 January 2025 11: 21
          I am a shipbuilder by education. After graduating from technical school, I worked in ship repair, then I measured residual thicknesses and defected hull structures. I also sailed the seas and oceans when a ship was being prepared for repairs, the so-called zero stage. When I got tired of climbing around in ballast tanks, I switched to the "other side of the barricades", superintendent, technical director. Now I've switched again, to shipbuilding. hi
    2. 0
      4 January 2025 14: 42
      Well, firstly, the Big Dipper is not the only one that can fulfill government orders, and secondly, in such matters it is not customary to count money.
      1. -1
        4 January 2025 14: 57
        From the state order only two 45 ton caps for "Lider" and two port cranes for a private company? Somehow along the NSR they would have come out gold with Swarovski crystals.
        1. +1
          4 January 2025 15: 03
          Government orders usually turn out like this) The cranes, by the way, were also golden, they won't make them like that for us anymore. And they were also part of the Far Eastern government program.
        2. 0
          9 January 2025 23: 15
          And now no lids, no taps, no Swarovski crystals...
    3. +2
      4 January 2025 15: 00
      Exactly, 4-6 vessels. And definitely a reconnoitered ice situation. There is no other way - economics.
  6. +5
    4 January 2025 07: 12
    NATO's next step should be to blow up a Swedish ferry heading to Germany using Soviet-style mines deployed from a tanker (that's the story). The mines will be laid by the Khokhis, and special forces will be deployed from a fishing vessel. The control trawling after the ferry is blown up will provide a sample of the Soviet mine as evidence.
    This guarantees a wave of necessary hysteria and a reason to blockade Russia in the Baltic. As a bonus - the right people will come to power in Germany and Sweden will send its pilots to the skies of Ukraine. And the rest will follow suit.
    This is if we wait and whine.
    1. 0
      4 January 2025 11: 34
      on Soviet-style mines deployed from a tanker
      There must be anchor galvanic shock mines of the 1908 model.
      1. +2
        4 January 2025 12: 22
        This is "Russia - which they lost". And in the USSR they were more powerful. fellow
    2. -2
      4 January 2025 16: 38
      This is if we wait and whine.

      Well, how do you think this disgrace can be stopped?
      As for me, we turn the chessboard over and make a warning test nuclear ground strike of high power on the Yavoriv test site. Although, perhaps it still makes sense to wait what Trump says after taking office. Not much time left.
      1. +9
        4 January 2025 19: 04
        It's a pity, Alexey, that you don't understand me!
        Nuclear weapons are not fireworks or scarecrows. They are weapons that must be used wisely in the interests of achieving victory in an armed confrontation. At the same time, the destruction of the population with nuclear weapons is simply a form of terror.
        Here's what you need to do:
        With or without the use of nuclear weapons (the military knows best!) it is necessary to cut off NATO's Baltic claw once and for all. Decisively and mercilessly, while NATO is not ready for a global confrontation. This will discourage NATO's core members from arranging arrests and blockades for a long time. After the lightning-fast occupation of Czechoslovakia in 1968, Western Europeans immediately became more accommodating and began to play with all sorts of Détente and Helsinki agreements. I was a schoolboy then and I remember it well.
        Only the operation in the Baltics must be full-fledged, with the appropriate outfit of forces, ensuring its lightning-fast implementation. Another such absurdity as the SVO may end in the collapse of the country. And the alternative - to bury one's head in the sand in the hope of getting by with only disgrace, will inevitably end in collapse.
        1. -3
          5 January 2025 00: 49
          However, Czechoslovakia was a member of the Warsaw Pact, and the same tribalts are already members of NATO. That is, in this case we attack NATO. Yes, it seems that we do not have any extra forces. Everything is involved in the SVO.
          1. +3
            5 January 2025 10: 14
            If we have no strength, then we lie in the den and wait for them to surround us and take us with a spear.
            Time is working against us. No matter what the pro-government propagandists buzz about.
            1. +3
              5 January 2025 13: 39
              Yes, in my opinion, time is against us. The Ukrainian Armed Forces are arming themselves with more advanced equipment. Foreign trade is getting worse. There are more and more sanctions. It is unclear what Russia is doing. On the eve of Trump's inauguration, a massive strike on Bankovskaya by the same Oreshnik would not hurt. So to speak, for propaganda purposes.
        2. +5
          5 January 2025 15: 33
          not at the same time NGS. I don't have the guts, and I don't have enough knowledge.
          1. 0
            9 January 2025 10: 03
            Quote: valentber
            not at the same time NGS.
            Is it really about the National Guard?
    3. +1
      5 January 2025 23: 39
      Well, American gas carriers carrying liquefied gas for Europe can explode on various ancient mines. How will the Americans transport gas to Europe, organize an air bridge like they once did? It's beyond their power. I'm not even talking about the fact that we can detain these gas carriers (for participation in the explosion of the "Nord Stream", for example) and take them to Murmansk. And who knows what we can detain for participation in the explosion of the Nord Stream: it's scary to think about.
  7. +3
    4 January 2025 07: 49
    Firstly, what the European media writes and uses is an "incident" and how it actually happened, for us there should be two big differences. It's a pity that the fact that there was no seizure-interception of a tanker with Russian cargo is explained to people by VO articles or commentators under the articles, and not by official structures.
    Secondly, who are the Western media counting on when they claim that the trail from the anchor that the tanker was supposedly dragging along the bottom of the Baltic Sea stretches for more than a hundred nautical miles, and the captain of the tanker, they say, explains that he didn’t even feel it and it didn’t affect the movement and control of the tanker? On the fools at home or on the Russians in Russia who are hungry because of the alleged lack of truth?
    Thirdly. With such fabrications and distortions in the Western media, Europe wants to show its citizens that the Russian Baltic Fleet has no influence in the Baltic, and therefore NATO countries of the Baltic Sea can calmly and freely seize, intercept, detain any ship, even under the Russian flag, even with Russian cargo. So, soon, perhaps, we will see ships with Russian cargo in the Baltic Sea, accompanied by a convoy of ships of the Russian Baltic Fleet. There are different types of savage pirates. The Somali aborigines are one thing, and the Finno-Tribaltic aborigines are another. But we must protect ourselves from both equally. With the help of the ships of the Russian Navy.
    1. +2
      4 January 2025 08: 17
      North 2. The Navy in the Western States is not stupid. A week ago, the "hot Finnish guys" officially published the process of control over tankers coming from Russia. A request is made by e-mail and if there is no such in direct radio communication - provide insurance for the transported cargo in accordance with world maritime law (details). Provided, Thank you, Please, Have a nice trip. And without this there will simply be global chaos on the sea routes. We also have a Navy and in the States the Navy knows about this and knows our response, but no one wants to bring it to this.
      1. +2
        5 January 2025 04: 14
        If the tanker is sailing in international waters, then what the hell are the "hot Finnish guys" doing there?
      2. +1
        5 January 2025 23: 44
        The Finns have no right to exercise control over ships sailing the open sea, in international waters. No one has authorized them to do so. What kind of insurance there is and whether it corresponds to the cargo is none of their business.
    2. +1
      4 January 2025 17: 42
      The Chukhons showed their true colors in the Great Patriotic War, participating in punitive actions. Half shot Soviet troops in the back and slaughtered Poles and Jews, and the other half fed the first and hid them in basements and attics.
  8. +3
    4 January 2025 08: 16
    Regarding all this, Russia stated that the arrest of the ship by Finland is not Russia's business.
    Although according to documents the tanker is registered in the Cook Islands
    According to the Constitution of the Cook Islands, the head of state is His Majesty the King of Great Britain, and the islands themselves are in association with New Zealand, being a self-governing territory. In addition, most countries in the world do not recognize the Cook Islands as a subject of international law, the countries of the European Union maintain diplomatic relations with them, in addition, the countries of Oceania and Polynesia, South Africa, India, Peru, Chile, Indonesia, Vietnam, the USA, Cuba, Canada, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Brazil. In addition, the author probably exaggerates that the tanker is a vessel of the "shadow fleet" of Russia.
  9. +5
    4 January 2025 09: 15
    With such a toothless leadership of the country, our citizens abroad will be shot every other one. Just for fun.
  10. +4
    4 January 2025 09: 52
    There are many subtleties in this matter, but there is one common problem with the brake of such traffic - someone has to pay for the downtime of a ship with cargo, and this is not three kopecks a day, but rather significantly more. The cargo may not be taken by a wily Finn or someone else, but the ship may eventually be released. Two weeks is enough to launch a wave of expenses along the entire chain. Once or twice these expenses will spread and spread over a period, although this is not a small amount, but creating such problems on a regular basis (and this is what the Europeans are trying to test) will hit the wallet hard. There is no free downtime here. Even if the ship de facto belongs to the supplier through 33 schemes, this only makes the situation easier, but does not remove the problem of expenses.
    Actually, no one "seized" the ships - neither Chinese nor ours, no one arrested either the cargo or the "water unit". In this regard, even the Iranians had even more problems. That is, it is not a seizure, not an arrest, but it is a real problem. And it looks like someone on the Big Foggy Island is extorting a bribe for transit or something like that.
    1. +2
      4 January 2025 12: 47
      The most interesting thing is that there is a register - Cook Islands, there is an owner company from the United Arab Emirates. Technical management is carried out by an Indian office, there is no one who bought gasoline in Russia, the owner of the cargo at the time of the transition. The cargo is not arrested, and it may have another owner. Where the ship was going, to which port, is not indicated in the article. The main person here is the owner of the cargo, and not the owners and managers.
      1. -1
        4 January 2025 13: 30
        Here is the "new owner of the cargo" laughing
        1. +2
          4 January 2025 13: 36
          What's wrong is that the owner of the cargo is not indicated in the ship's documents, the cargo can be resold en route. And that's what is done, or at the dock, if there are no restrictions regarding it.
          1. -1
            4 January 2025 13: 51
            Depends on what you mean by "ship's documents". The cargo manifest in any case contains information about the sender and the recipient. They may be "technical", but nevertheless they will be there. Resale of the cargo will also require changes in the documents and a separate official order. You can ask "third parties" to pay for the cargo, if there is such an option in the invoice, but this is not an assignment of rights.
      2. -1
        4 January 2025 15: 05
        In case of a criminal case, and there already is one, the cargo remains material evidence and cannot be sold. And then, when an honest Chukhonsky court finds someone guilty, the cargo is confiscated to pay damages. It's simple.
        1. +1
          4 January 2025 15: 27
          “Veschdok” is actually an anchor here laughing , the defendant is the ship owner, the security is the vessel. And the cargo must be discharged ashore for storage, for which the consignor or owner (if they are different) will have to pay the costs of storage, as well as unloading and loading. The cargo cannot be confiscated, it has nothing to do with it formally, unless it is proven that the object that caused the damage (the vessel) does not belong to the consignor or owner. Well, something like that
  11. +3
    4 January 2025 10: 02
    The tense situation is only due to the fact that the Kremlin authorities leave any attacks and even terrorist acts of Western countries unanswered. Apparently, the Kremlin is paralyzed by fear even of the Finns.
    1. +4
      4 January 2025 10: 10
      Our sea traffic has changed, provide the facts!? Or are you going to throw it on the fan here. laughing
    2. -1
      4 January 2025 10: 34
      Grunting enemies of Russia, grunting enemies of Russia, stupid people who, due to their stupidity, are worse than purposeful enemies of Russia. Which ones are you?
  12. +2
    4 January 2025 10: 32
    This can be solved very simply - by counter-arresting the Finnish vessel.
  13. +2
    4 January 2025 11: 02
    Maybe the Russian Navy should stop simply showing the flag and guarding the naval base, isn't it time to get down to the work for which the Navy is required - guarding and escorting convoys of civilian ships on the world's oceans.
    1. +4
      4 January 2025 12: 57
      What makes you think the ship is Russian? Cook Islands registry, UAE owners, Indian managers, suppliers, gasoline, bought in Russia, by someone, and this "someone", the owner of the cargo, is unknown, by the way, on the way from port to port, the cargo may have been repurchased 100 times. The crew is not Russian, the captain is Georgian, named Avas... probably... And yes, the cargo is not arrested.
    2. +1
      5 January 2025 04: 11
      To do this, it is necessary to have bases and supply points; it is necessary to have a fleet of auxiliary ships.
  14. +8
    4 January 2025 11: 04
    From all that has been said, the following conclusion can be drawn. Thieving Russian capitalists are carrying out schemes to further rob the Russian Federation, they are carrying out schemes with courts that have nothing to do with the Russian Federation, and when they get their hands slapped, they start howling.
    And the hurray-patriots are full of sympathy for them. lol
    No, guys, they got it right. Because there was nothing to steal.
  15. 0
    4 January 2025 12: 04
    So, have the adherents of “we don’t need a navy because we are a land power” and “we’ll make do with boats and frigates, we have a strategic missile force” seen what it’s like to have no normal navy or no navy at all? Yes laughing
    1. +1
      5 January 2025 04: 08
      And let's call it "the fleet of the Marquis Puddle"? We should take into account both the specifics of the seas and the availability of infrastructure.
    2. -1
      9 January 2025 12: 08
      Quote from AdAstra
      So, have the adherents of “we don’t need a navy because we are a land power” and “we’ll make do with boats and frigates, we have a strategic missile force” seen what it’s like to have no normal navy or no navy at all? Yes laughing

      If the captain VOLUNTARILY stopped - then this is not a pirate takeover, as the local sailors explained above.
      He might not have stopped.
      And if the Finns had started to capture it then, the Navy might have needed it.
      But to drive convoys taking into account the volume of trade - no fleets will be enough
  16. +5
    4 January 2025 12: 31
    Trying to understand two issues at once or to combine them in the solution from A. Herzen and N. Chernyshevsky, in my opinion, is counterproductive... In these issues, there is only a cause-and-effect relationship that lies on the surface. The pressure on Russia will only increase, "on all fronts" and its "deepening" will leave the LBS and "move" into the depths of Russia, through overt terrorism, hidden sabotage and, most importantly, the strengthening of the destruction of the psyche and the remnants of ideology in the heads of the Russian citizen... And any state with a population deprived of ideology is "raw clay" from which you can "mold" everything that the enemy needs, having patience, skills and "skillful hands". Ukroreikh is a vivid example of this, and other union states of the former USSR are "on the way"... Russia, one might say, "broke into" the "friendly family" of capitalist states, trampling, forgetting, slandering, along the way, everything that the country had for decades, erasing from its history everything necessary, wise, eternal... Putting "at the forefront" the main thing in "European values" - egoism, money, "indifference" towards the state... The ideological education of the population was given a "fat cross" in the Constitution of the Russian Federation... And now we are starting to pay "the bills," And the bills are terrible, humiliating - offensive... We are paying for our stupidity, meanness and betrayal... After all, in the "friendly family" of capitalist states there are no other ways to "put in place" someone who felt too free or with different views on sovereignty, freedom and equality... History tried to "invent" ways of coexistence of states with different social - economic system, but reality has corrected this "fiction" that the USSR "fell for"... The result is obvious... The conclusion is uncontested: either we "impose strict order" in this "friendly family" by changing our own socio-economic system, or the "friendly family" will "cleanse" the territory of Russia, turning it into a raw materials appendage of the world... As the ancients said, "Tertium non datur" (lat.) - "There is no third option".....
    1. -2
      4 January 2025 17: 05
      Many years ago, the newly-minted oligarch Misha Prokhorov declared on the Central Television screen: "If someone wants to cancel the results of privatization, the country will be covered in blood." I mean that "changing one's own socio-economic system" is not a relevant issue in the Russian Federation today. So what's left? It's not hard to guess.
      1. 0
        5 January 2025 15: 42
        Jew Misha can say whatever he wants. He is just a wallet and has no right to vote.
    2. -1
      9 January 2025 12: 13
      Quote from nordscout
      The ideological education of the population was given a "fat cross" in the Constitution of the Russian Federation

      In the USSR there was ideology and?
      In 1943, the Wehrmacht's engineer battalions were staffed at the level of 6-10% Germans, and the rest were "Hiwis". Moreover, with the standard weapons of the battalion's personnel.
      This is about the high quality of German belay dugouts and well-laid minefields.
  17. 0
    4 January 2025 19: 16
    The idea with the cables is good. It is better to use underwater self-propelled drones to damage them. It reaches the expected location of the cable in a semi-submerged state using geolocation. And then it dives and plows the bottom
    1. 0
      4 January 2025 20: 37
      futurohunter, there are such "bells and whistles" too.....
      1. 0
        5 January 2025 22: 27
        Well, it's time... When?
  18. +2
    4 January 2025 23: 20
    Everyone wonders why they were afraid to touch the USSR ships? Because the Soviet Union could "shoot back" with non-blank shells, as it did with the Korean plane. And if Russia is now threatening with something, then don't blab. But do as Karaganov says. In this case, the West would no longer think about whether Russia will do it or just threaten. Detonate a nuclear charge in the US desert, having warned the right people half an hour beforehand.
    There is no need to say anything more.
    1. +2
      5 January 2025 15: 44
      not under the rule of liberals and Zionist oligarchs. They will not do anything really equivalent
      yut. The West has figured it out, it seems.
      1. 0
        6 January 2025 09: 14
        I would add - not in this economic system. laughing
    2. -1
      9 January 2025 12: 18
      Quote: Vik Ganz
      Everyone wonders why they were afraid to touch the USSR ships? Because the Soviet Union could "shoot back" with non-blank shells, as it did with the Korean plane.

      Yep ...
      Here on the site there are people who participated in the piling on American ships in the World Cup under the USSR. Squeezing out OUR territoryb back abroad...
      But WHY SOMETHING not even shooting decoratively - like the Russian ship.
  19. +2
    5 January 2025 04: 04
    Nobody from the top leadership of the Russian Federation will do anything. All they do is just talk the usual talk about "red" lines, which in reality turn out to be either brown with the smell of guano, or green...
  20. kig
    +1
    5 January 2025 05: 24
    No one in their right mind would intentionally tear underwater communications with their anchor. First of all, because it is very easy to track. Which is what we see. And the rest of the noise is just a coincidence. It has long been believed that the "shadow fleet" is not technically completely sane vessels, which has been confirmed.

    Although history knows of some truly unique cases. In the 80s, a ship belonging to the MRKH set out from Kamchatka to Vladivostok, the name has already been erased from memory. Soon after leaving, one of the anchors slowly released itself and somewhere caught almost a Pacific Fleet communication cable. In this state, the steamship moved for about two days, until the crew finally realized that the ship's speed for some reason did not correspond to the expected one. The anchor was raised and secured, and what was dangling on it was cut off and thrown overboard. Naturally, this event was not reflected anywhere in any journals, but they were identified.
  21. 0
    5 January 2025 08: 30
    Quote: Coward
    Most likely, the boatswain was too lazy to tighten the anchor chain stopper and fixed it with the windlass band brake. Well, then, as usual, the drum began to slip and the chain gradually wore out.

    Has the boatswain been nominated for an award?
  22. +1
    5 January 2025 18: 19
    Quote: valentber
    Jew Misha can say whatever he wants. He is just a wallet and has no right to vote.

    It's funny: on the one hand, he can say whatever he wants, but on the other hand, he has no right to vote. laughing In fact, he voiced the opinion of all oligarchs of the Russian Federation (and probably not only them), and that's the whole point - if there is an attempt to change anything in the country, they are ready for a civil war. Look, RMK, or whatever it's called (I'm not talking about Gazprom), has its own army of brats quite openly. So whaaaaa, in the current Russian Federation no changes in power are expected. P.S. And the security forces, let me remind you, are focused on preserving the current government, which is, in general, logical.
    1. 0
      5 January 2025 22: 46
      It's a pity that at that time there was no article for extremism. He could have been placed next to Khodorkovsky.
      1. +1
        6 January 2025 09: 12
        That was the time of "primary accumulation of capital", the authorities stood up for all the new "masters of the Russian land", if only there was no rollback to socialism - they would not have been imprisoned. Now, yes, they could. Because you can still make good money on this laughing
    2. -1
      9 January 2025 12: 22
      Quote: Doliva63
      Quote: valentber
      Jew Misha can say whatever he wants. He is just a wallet and has no right to vote.

      It's funny: on the one hand, he can say whatever he wants, but on the other hand, he has no right to vote. laughing In fact, he voiced the opinion of all oligarchs of the Russian Federation (and probably not only them), and that's the whole point - if there is an attempt to change anything in the country, they are ready for a civil war. Look, RMK, or whatever it's called (I'm not talking about Gazprom), has its own army of brats quite openly. So whaaaaa, in the current Russian Federation no changes in power are expected. P.S. And the security forces, let me remind you, are focused on preserving the current government, which is, in general, logical.

      A sufficiently large number of the population will fight for their own - if not openly, then underground.
      And vice versa, there will be significantly fewer people going into battle for a bright future than in the Civil War (there are significantly fewer proletarians without anything now than then)....
  23. +1
    6 January 2025 18: 44
    If we failed to quickly push the enemy away from the borders, if we failed to quickly increase the area of ​​our country, it is time for diplomats to work one and a half shifts. Or isn't it time for the smartest and most cunning to persuade, threaten, bribe and explain for the interests of the country?
  24. 0
    9 January 2025 16: 22
    We urgently need to connect fresh forces to the war in Ukraine. Ukraine itself is running out of steam, fresh blood is urgently needed. Something went wrong with the oil pipeline in Poland, the communication cables of Finland and Estonia were torn off. Something tells me that they are next, together with the Poles..................
  25. 0
    10 January 2025 18: 58
    Putin will never harm Europe, never. If Russian cities are bombed, which is already happening, if Russian territory is occupied, which is already happening, if Russian children are killed, which is already happening, Putin will never harm Europe, because he is not like them.