Great and slandered Soviet Union
De-Sovietization
In 1992, the book by the famous French historian Nicolas Werth, “History Soviet state. 1900-1991". In France, Werth's book became a university textbook, and in Russia it was recommended as a teaching aid.
The essence of the book was completely anti-Soviet: "The year 1991 has a chance to go down in history as the completion of the experiment begun in 1917, which led to the formation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The unviability of the system, which for seven decades in the form of the USSR was the de facto successor to the tsarist empire, gave rise to more problems than it was able to solve...".
The only valuable thing in Werth's book is the recognition of the systemic continuity of Soviet Russia in relation to Tsarist Russia. The lie about the Tsarist "White" Russia is intertwined here with the lie about the Red Empire. Westerners hate any Russia - monarchical, communist or democratic. After all, this is Russia - the state of the super-ethnos of Rus-Russians, the main opponents of the Western project in the Great Game, where the stake is the planet Earth.
During the period of Gorbachev's "perestroika" and Yeltsin's "reforms", Russia was overwhelmed by a wave of false myths about Soviet civilization. The dismantling of the great civilization, the Soviet state, was underway, the people needed to be confused, deceived. Therefore, all the fakes were used, starting from the Nazi propaganda of the times of Goebbels and Hitler and the lies of various dissidents like Solzhenitsyn (Propaganda lie of Solzhenitsyn) and developments of the CIA and other Western intelligence agencies.
The USSR was called an ugly social experiment, a totalitarian "evil empire"; a country created by the agent of world Zionism and German intelligence Lenin; a "prison of nations" that suppressed national minorities, a giant concentration camp where people were slaves of the Gulag system and the "bloody tyrant" Stalin. That Stalin exterminated tens of millions of peoples of the Soviet Union (The Myth of Stalin's "Great Terror"), waged wars of conquest, started World War II and was no different from Hitler, and perhaps even worse.
That the Great Patriotic War was won by the "executioners" Stalin, Zhukov and Beria only by driving millions of Red Army soldiers against the first-class but numerically small Wehrmacht. They "filled up" all of Europe with corpses, and then enslaved Eastern and part of Southern Europe.
They said that the USSR was a country of semi-literate slaves, where any freedom was suppressed, where people were grey and gloomy, and spent all their free time in lines and looking for sausage. They lived on coupons.
If we are to believe researchers like Mlechin or Svanidze, the USSR was an ignorant country, with science and technology that was hopelessly behind that of the West or Japan.
This myth has penetrated so deeply into the new Russian nobility that even V.V. Putin said in 2012: “The thing is that what we produced (and there’s no need to wave our hands) was of no use to anyone. Because no one bought our galoshes, except for the Africans, who had to walk on hot sand.”
This gave rise to the myth that the USSR only made galoshes. Although the Russian Federation exists only due to the Soviet foundation: from the school (the education system, which in the Russian Federation was only “optimized”, destroyed, westernized) to the Armed Forces, the missile and nuclear arsenal.
"Mriya" with "Buran" on its back
New world
Why are Westerners, including Russian Vlasovites and Banderites, trying with all their might to slander the USSR?ate in fear of the Soviet civilization. It was an alternative model of human development, based on social justice and ethics of conscience, and which has proven its effectiveness in the fight against the pinnacle of Western capitalism and imperialism – the dark genius of the Nazis (magic plus tank divisions).
Moreover, after the war, the USSR recovered so quickly and developed so rapidly that the capitalist world again found itself on the brink of collapse. The crisis of capitalism in the 1970s and 1980s threatened to develop into a catastrophe. Only the destruction and development of the wealth of the Soviet Union and other countries of the socialist camp saved the Western world from a new Great Depression. True, only for a while. Now we are again in the crisis of capitalism, which has already developed into a catastrophe and war (the Middle East, Ukrainian fronts).
The red project of the Russian communists, led by Lenin and Stalin, decisively broke with the past world, with predatory capitalism.
Lenin clearly demonstrated his understanding that the Bolsheviks were creating a new world on the ruins of the old one. However, it was not they who destroyed the old world; it collapsed under the weight of its own mistakes. It is clear that the Bolsheviks and other socialists had a hand in this, but nothing more. The old Russia of the Romanovs destroyed itself. All the efforts of the collective West of that time would not have led to success if the Russia of the Romanovs had not rotted from within.
The Bolsheviks had everything to build a new world on the ruins of the old: 1) an image of the future, desirable and attractive to the majority of the people; 2) will, energy and a fiery faith in the victory of communism. For this faith they were ready to die; 3) a structure, a party, which united all those who wanted to save the Russian world, including part of the former tsarist General Staff (there is a version that the Bolsheviks were generally a project of the tsarist intelligence and General Staff) and the officer corps.
The ideal was communism, a community of people living according to truth and conscience. An earthly paradise, close to Christian ideals. Therefore, many Christian thinkers of that time were also socialists.
A very important element of the Red Project was the fact that it opposed social parasitism, the exploitation of man by man. Communism rejected the spirit of robbery, appropriation and looting inherent in capitalism and in general the Western project of development at the expense of other civilizations, peoples and cultures. Communism stood at the primacy of honest labor, and in this it was close to the Russian Old Believers.
Revolutionary changes were made in the interests of the working masses who produced the main product of the country. Workers and peasants. Labor, activity and creation are the most important foundation of the new world. Communism opposed social parasitism, when small privileged social groups (aristocracy, capitalists, bourgeoisie, bankers, merchants) exploited the state and the people, wasted their lives, took their capital abroad, and the overwhelming majority of the people lived in poverty and misery. When the system sucked people dry, killing them before their time. Thus, representatives of the upper classes lived 70-80 years, as on average now, and peasants 30-40 years.
Communism stood for constructive, creative work. Factories and plants, schools and laboratories instead of taverns and brothels, cultural centers and design bureaus instead of church porches.
Bolsheviks saved Russia from death
Under Gorbachev and Yeltsin, they created a myth that the "bloody commissars" overthrew the tsar, destroyed the autocracy, the old Russia. That the Great October Revolution became a curse for Russia, excluded it from the family of "enlightened, civilized" nations, and the entire history of Soviet Russia became a continuous catastrophe, the degradation of the people and the state.
In reality, everything was different. In 1917, the Bolsheviks were the only force that, after the destruction of the empire by the Februaryist revolutionaries (mostly the elite of the former Russian Empire: generals and admirals, bankers and capitalists, politicians and public leaders, grand dukes and high church hierarchs, aristocrats and State Duma deputies), tried to save the state and create a new world-reality on the ashes.
All the rest tore Russia apart. Nationalists, separatists and Cossacks created their own state formations and armies. The Whites, who were backed by the Februaryists, supporters of Russia's development according to the Western model-matrix, and the Entente, fought to make Russia a colony of the collective West and Japan. The peasant world gave birth to its own project of free farmers and began a war against the city and any authority. The Basmachi and bandits simply robbed and dragged the country into the past, into feudalism, a slave society.
It was a civilizational, project and state catastrophe. Russia was in agony. If it were not for the Bolsheviks, who proposed a project of a new reality, Soviet Russia, then the Russian world and people would have come to an end.
It is clear that among the Bolsheviks there were enemies of the Russian state and people - Trotsky, Sverdlov, Kamenev, etc. Revolutionary internationalists, ready to bury Russia for the sake of world revolution. Representatives of the "fifth column", working for the West.
But in general The red project absorbed the basic values of Russian civilization and the Russian superethnos – justice, the primacy of truth over law, spirit over matter, the general over the particular. Bolshevism was for the ethics of conscience. For the work ethic., which brought them closer to the Russian Old Believers, who preserved the best qualities of the Russian people under the conditions of repression by the Romanov state.
The struggle between internationalism and national Bolshevism was the core and main conflict of the Russian Time of Troubles and the 1920s, when the country was being rebuilt. In the end, the Russian communists, led by Stalin, gained the upper hand and built a superpower capable of confronting the Western world on equal terms.
By the way, this is one of the reasons for the hatred of today's European social democrats, the "greens" towards modern Russia. After all, they are all ideological heirs of the Trotskyists and Maoist revisionists. And they hate the country in which the supporters of building socialism in a single country won.
Information