Ruble, dollar, barrel, rates, prices - halfway to peace, at the beginning of the path to prosperity

23
Ruble, dollar, barrel, rates, prices - halfway to peace, at the beginning of the path to prosperity


What does Russia care about oil?


After the terrible ecological catastrophe in our Black Sea waters, the consequences of which will now take years to get rid of, the authors involuntarily ask themselves: is it worth paying such a price for the notorious prosperity?



Sorry for such a pompous introduction, but we won't even talk about everything else that everyone will have to "pay" for, and it seems, always. Especially since we are getting it in full for the umpteenth time, and not from where we seriously feared it.

For the sake of profits, we are ready to do anything – such are the rules of the game under capitalism, the choice in favor of which Russia made more than thirty years ago. However, we cannot afford not to trade oil and gas at all, and we cannot do without man-made disasters at home – that is, without the notorious export.


Here's the problem: balancing oil prices around the $70 per barrel mark corresponds perfectly not only with the dollar at around 100 rubles, but also with high interest rates as a means against inflation, which, judging by practice, is, alas, an absolutely useless means.

But the fact that with expensive money, be it rubles or dollars, prices by definition cannot decrease or even freeze, is already at the end of our hyper-forecast. And now about our dependence on oil trade.

It can still be sold for real convertible currency, which is the main difference from gas, for which more and more yuan is dripping into the treasury, thereby getting us hooked on buying everything Chinese. How is this not the notorious import needle?

Severe China Syndrome


And while gas prices in Europe have risen above $485 per thousand cubic meters, and this is with $120-130 in the US itself, oil prices continue to fall. This is all due to concerns about whether to expect demand growth in 2025, especially in China.

In fact, forecasts from Chinese state-owned oil refiner Sinopec, included in its annual energy outlook released on Dec. 19, should provide reassurance to both oil producers and bullish traders.

Sinopec believes that China's crude oil imports could peak as early as 2025. China is the world's largest buyer of crude oil, and its consumption, according to the same forecast, will peak only by 2027. That means at least two years of almost guaranteed price increases ahead.

However, OPEC views the Chinese estimates with skepticism, believing that they are biased in order to slow down the growth of prices here and now. According to experts from the oil cartel, at the moment, in the conditions of global instability, oil prices "are in a state of prolonged consolidation".

According to a number of signs, the current oil free-for-all, when not only the US, which has effectively withdrawn from positive agreements, but also those who play in OPEC+, allow themselves too much, will soon come to an end. OPEC itself is already demanding stricter discipline in deliveries.

Why Trump is Again for the Dollar and Against Oil


This long-awaited American president, hardly anyone would argue, is rushing to promise to do everything or at least almost everything. To reconcile Russia with Ukraine, to sort out what is happening in the Near and Middle East, to make China stand at attention.

Of course, he is not obliged to do absolutely everything and even everything that he has time to do. Many things can be postponed until better times. For example, the calculation of the national debt, where there are quite enough bright statements that no one will ever write off anything to anyone.

But buying the Panama Canal or Greenland - coming from Donald Trump, it only sounds nice, but with what funds? Maybe with the same ones that are urgently needed to replenish the strategic reserve?


We will never tire of reminding you that the US has only about three weeks of fuel left, but who can be scared by that today? And the future President Trump, it seems, was not going to scare anyone even with Greenland.

Is it worth reminding that in the States, even the newly elected Federal Reserve, a private shop, is not an order, but nothing more than a buyer. Even the enviably independent Trump prefers to coordinate his actions and words with it. It is not for nothing that we have been observing the growth of the US dollar exchange rate for the second month already.

Yes, Trump is still waiting for a new home in the White House, and the dollar has already grown to a two-year high. And it has even affected oil prices. Not in the direction that the Chinese would like, for example. The stronger the dollar, the more expensive the oil. For everyone, but not for the Americans.

They will replenish their strategic reserves and slow down the price of gasoline within the country. There is no need to explain why, it is enough that the Federal Reserve System decided to remind that even under the Republicans in power “they will carefully approach the reduction of interest rates in 2025.”

Everyone is talking about something else, but we're talking about bets again


And since we are talking about other people's rates, let us also remind you about our own, Russian ones, which, in our opinion, are simply indecently high. And no amount of enthusiasm about high interest rates on bank deposits can blur this reality.

Well, the vast majority of the population has nothing to put in these banks of yours. Worse, loans have to be taken even under a mortgage, where the interest rate only seems low, but insurance and various guarantees with service in addition are generally not affordable for anyone.


The rate cut, which no one expected from the Bank of Russia in December, is postponed until at least the end of 2025. The strengthening of the ruble, as can be understood from the rhetoric of the Bank of Russia representatives, is completely cancelled.

Those who make decisions and those who skim the cream off the hasty sale of oil do not need a strong ruble, while tankers from the “shadow” fleet" they didn't arrest. And let those who are not listed in the "shadow fleet" split in two. And let the deserted beaches of Taman in December be flooded with fuel oil. Volunteers have dealt with worse.

But what we don't know for sure and can't predict is whether anyone will have anything indexed to the new price level? We're not talking about salaries, we're told that they're already sky-high in Russia, but where and for whom? We're talking about pensions and benefits, on which some people can only survive...

Let's draw a sort of finish line. Oil may well be cheaper than 70 dollars. A dollar cheaper than 100 rubles is unlikely. And prices will grow, and grow, alas, faster than we would like. About 20 percent per year. With official inflation at 7-8 percent.
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    27 December 2024 03: 44
    This is the first time I've liked an article from these authors.
    There are already more analytics and conclusions than slogans.
    1. +3
      27 December 2024 07: 58
      Quote: Proton
      This is the first time I've liked an article from these authors.
      There are already more analytics and conclusions than slogans.

      But still, myth upon myth. For example
      Is it worth reminding that in the States, the Federal Reserve, which is actually a private shop, is not even given orders by the newly elected person, but is nothing more than a buyer.

      Only Presidents appoint Fed governors, and after Trump takes office, he will have most of the governors appointed by him. For example, the Fed Chairman, who was appointed by Trump in his last term, is still sitting.
      Powell was nominated by U.S. President Donald Trump to be the Chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve. The U.S. Senate Committee on the subject approved Powell's nomination with one vote against on December 5, 2017.[13] On January 23, 2018, Powell was confirmed by the U.S. Senate by a vote of 84 to 13.[14]
      1. -5
        27 December 2024 09: 20
        All power to the Soviets!

        Quote: BlackMokona
        Only Presidents appoint Fed governors.

        Well, just like our Central Bank...
        And who killed Kennedy for starting to print US government dollars?
    2. AAK
      0
      27 December 2024 08: 59
      There is some kind of dissonance with the final press talk of the Great... the lads should rejoice...
  2. +1
    27 December 2024 03: 59
    And prices will grow, and, alas, grow faster than we would like. About 20 percent per year. With official inflation at 7-8 percent.
    If only it were that way...It's really cool!
  3. 0
    27 December 2024 04: 09
    It's certainly nice to read coffee grounds...you can stuff anything into the head of a gullible layman...heh heh, then heat him up for the required amount.
    Without loha life is bad.
    As always, the end buyer and taxpayers will pay for everything.
  4. +7
    27 December 2024 04: 47
    In fact, a terrible catastrophe happened precisely because they save on everything to make a profit, if I'm not mistaken, one of the ships was not intended to go to sea at all, but everyone turned a blind eye to it, and now oh, what a catastrophe and of course the world is being saved from our pockets. In general, financial analysis is an extremely thankless thing, loans are very indicative, to take 2,5 million for 18 years, you will only overpay 11,2 million. All these profits, indices, futures, this is for those who receive this profit, and ordinary people are not just being cut, they are already openly robbed, hiding behind numbers and various increases, but in fact, there is not even a hole in the bagel looming ahead ...
    1. +3
      27 December 2024 08: 00
      Quote from turembo
      If I'm not mistaken, one of the ships was not intended to go to sea at all

      All three ships were built as river ships. And they were sent out to sea in a storm, one after another.
      1. 0
        27 December 2024 22: 09
        Quote: BlackMokona
        All three ships were built as river ships. And they were sent out to sea in a storm, one after another.

        Where did you draw such "conclusions" from? belay
        The Volgoneft type vessels are large single-deck twin-screw tankers of the river-sea class. But the classes can be different, depending on the equipment and condition of the vessel.
        Volgoneft-212 Project 1577 Class formula: M-PR2,5
        Volgoneft-239 Project 1577 Class formula: O-PR2,0
        River vessels of class "M"
        Vessels assigned this class can sail in any weather. They are capable of overcoming waves 3 m high and up to 40 m wide. Vessels of this class have the highest sides, and hatches and external doors are watertight. Open passenger decks of class "M" vessels are equipped with bulwarks at least 90 cm high. Superstructures on such vessels are made of steel or other light metals, portholes are closed with blind covers or supplemented with a metal frame. Anchor chains on class "M" vessels are longer than on vessels of other classes.


        River vessels with the "PR" sign
        Vessels, in the classification of which there is an additional sign "PR", are suitable for navigation in coastal sea waters. At the same time, the maximum permissible wave height for vessels "O-PR" is 2 m., "M-PR" - 2.5 m.


        Class "O" river vessels
        Class "O" river vessels may sail in waves no higher than 2 m and no wider than 20 m. There are fewer requirements for the navigation and rescue equipment of such vessels than for class "M" vessels. The superstructures on class "O" vessels must be metal, but ordinary windows may be installed instead of portholes. Without weather restrictions, vessels of this class may sail only in the waters of their level.

        Another question is who released them with such a set of the case, or rather with its absence. They pass the annual test every year. wink
    2. The comment was deleted.
  5. +3
    27 December 2024 06: 00
    We will never tire of reminding you that the US only has enough fuel for about three weeks

    Three, it was last week, you wrote about it. A week has passed, therefore there are two weeks left.
    However, we cannot afford not to trade oil and gas at all.

    Why? Haven't we gotten off the gas and oil needle?
    1. +1
      27 December 2024 08: 01
      Quote: parusnik
      Three, it was last week, you wrote about it. A week has passed, therefore there are two weeks left.

      That's not how it works. The US lives on importing and extracting oil. And the reserve is their means of regulation. They can buy more oil to replenish the reserve or drain it. At the same time, they can regulate the tap as they please.
      1. +3
        27 December 2024 09: 50
        At the same time, they adjust the tap as they please.
        That's what we're talking about, not how much is left. We still need to put smileys and write sarcasm in brackets.
      2. 0
        27 December 2024 17: 43
        Don't write nonsense.
        Major sectors of the US economy (as a percentage of GDP):

        1. Services – 77%

        Real estate transactions: 12,3%

        Finance and insurance: 7,9%

        Professional, scientific and technical services: 7,9%

        Health: 8,3%

        Information (IT and media): 5,5%

        Retail: 5,8%

        Wholesale trade: 6,3%

        Hotel and restaurant business: 3,1%

        Transport and logistics: 3,2%

        Other services (education, entertainment, administrative services): 11,7%



        2. Industry and construction – 15%

        Industrial production: 11%

        Construction: 4%



        3. Agriculture – 1,1%


        4. Mining – 1,9%


        5. Utilities – 1,7%


        6. Public sector – 11,6%



        This shows that the US economy is predominantly service-oriented, accounting for more than 3/4 of total GDP, with smaller contributions from industry and other sectors.
        1. The comment was deleted.
  6. +2
    27 December 2024 10: 02
    What's worse, you have to take out loans even under a mortgage, where the interest rate only seems low

    For whom is it low? Now there are no "low" anywhere... "It's funny", the capitalists have played to the point that even "lifelong bondage" in the form of a mortgage is becoming unaffordable for the population... wassat
    1. -3
      27 December 2024 17: 41
      What capitalists? Don't write nonsense. Communists and security officers have been in power in the Russian Federation for the last hundred years
      1. 0
        2 January 2025 11: 08
        Quote: Bolt
        What capitalists? Don't write nonsense. Communists and security officers have been in power in the Russian Federation for the last hundred years

        Calm down, demagogue. Your noodles won't work here.
  7. 0
    27 December 2024 12: 17
    If the title is as juicy and enticing as possible, everything is clear at the beginning and then everything becomes unclear and floats away somewhere, becoming more and more streamlined and then suddenly ends - then I already understand who wrote it from the collective of VO authors.
  8. +1
    27 December 2024 12: 20
    New years are coming
    They will be difficult too
  9. +3
    27 December 2024 15: 26
    "halfway to peace, at the beginning of the path to prosperity" - sounds like a mockery.
    Some people bomb others - this is the "path to peace"
    Wild price increases are the "path to prosperity"

    Records were only written about the growth of oligarchs' fortunes. Both theirs and ours.
  10. -1
    27 December 2024 17: 39
    Everything is fine - for someone.
    - For an ecological catastrophe, all Russian tankers will be slowed down, especially in the Baltic Sea, and as we well know, the main fleet is old, therefore they will be hit, therefore there will be even less money.
    - Trump. How much is in this word. A man who loves agreements. And to make everyone reconcile. He has instruments of pressure.
    1) Oil - sanctions against Venezuela will be lifted, Canadians will be allowed to pump oil at Keystone, and the Saudis will not want to lose their share of the market, so the price will go down. And at a price below $50, it is not profitable to extract in the Russian Federation.
    2) Duties on goods from China. Consequently, China will have to devalue the yuan, which means that the Russian Federation's reserves, most of which are kept in yuan, will immediately collapse. There will be even less money for the war.
    P.S. Interesting times are coming. Everyone will get what they deserve. How I love the phrase: "What you deserve is what you get. What you get is what you deserve."
    1. 0
      3 January 2025 03: 13
      And at a price below $50 in the Russian Federation it is not profitable to mine.

      Where does this information come from?
      They will produce normally even at $30, but drilling shale wells in the US will definitely become unprofitable, and without constant drilling, shale oil production will quickly decline.
  11. 0
    27 December 2024 19: 00
    “balancing oil prices around the $70 per barrel mark”

    the price ceiling is set at $60 per barrel and no one has cancelled it yet


    “When money is expensive, whether rubles or dollars, prices by definition cannot fall or even freeze”

    The increase in population and the stimulation of the economy over 10 years under the quantitative easing program in the US and EU required an increase in the money supply, and the linking of the market-speculative economy of the Russian Federation to world prices creates a dependence with all the ensuing consequences.


    “getting us hooked on buying everything Chinese”

    The turn to China is a derivative of the political and economic blockade by the West. V.V. Putin said that it was not we who rejected the dollar, but we forced them to find an alternative to the dollar.


    “concerns about whether demand will pick up in 2025, especially in China”

    Obtaining heat and electricity from oil and gas is tantamount to putting out a fire with gold, not to mention the by-products.
    The transition of the automobile and aviation industry of China, the EU, Japan, South Korea, and the USA to electric traction would reduce the consumption of traditional types of fuel, but no alternative sources can completely replace them until the Russian Federation begins mass production and global expansion of nuclear batteries. Perhaps it will not begin, but will simply sell a license to someone for their production and will buy abroad.


    "The long-awaited American president is rushing with promises to do everything, or at least almost everything. To reconcile Russia with Ukraine"

    The war in Ukraine was predetermined by the EU's Eastern Partnership program, and the US cannot leave the EU alone with the Russian Federation and is forced to take on the main burden of supporting Ukraine while the main threat to US global domination comes not from the Russian Federation, but from China. Trump understands this, promises to resolve the situation and turn everything upside down - if the EU seeks to win on the battlefield and decolonize the Russian Federation, then not with US money - there is a conflict of interests between the EU and the US.


    “buy the Panama Canal or Greenland”

    The Panama Canal is of great importance for both China, which was even planning to build an alternative – the Nicaraguan Canal, and the US. This explains Trump’s desire to return the canal to US ownership.

    Canada is a treasure trove of natural resources and is fully associated with the United States economically and politically, which allows for painless unification into the United States of North America.

    Greenland is economically more connected to the United States than to the mother country and is of great importance to the United States as an outpost on the Northern Sea Route, allowing it to control the exit to the Atlantic of all commercial and military ships, and at the same time to collect fees from them. The claims of the state of Alaska to Wrangel Island are connected with this.


    “What should the vast majority of the population put in these banks of yours?”

    The reason is simple: if you put money in a bank at 20%, you will lose five percent, but if you put it under your mattress, you will lose all thirty.


    “We don’t need a strong ruble”

    A strong ruble is a guarantee of social, economic and political stability, which meets the strategic interests of the ruling class and the population, which contradicts the desire of the West to tear the Russian economy to shreds and defragment and decolonize the Russian Federation
  12. +1
    27 December 2024 21: 43
    For the sake of profit, we are ready to do anything – such are the rules of the game under capitalism, the choice in favor of which Russia made more than thirty years ago.

    The topic of this proposal is not disclosed. So who is this "Russia" that has made a choice in favor of capitalism, and who is not this "Russia"? wink