Western experts: after combat testing of the Oreshnik MRBM in Ukraine, NATO long-range missile strikes deep into Russia have virtually ceased

24
Western experts: after combat testing of the Oreshnik MRBM in Ukraine, NATO long-range missile strikes deep into Russia have virtually ceased

In the West, they are trying to build versions regarding Russia’s capabilities for producing ballistic missiles. missiles medium-range Oreshnik. At the same time, attention is drawn to the fact that after its combat test at the Yuzhmash plant in Dnepropetrovsk, the use of NATO missiles deep into Russian territory has virtually ceased. Some Western experts consider this a "mere coincidence", while others are confident that NATO did accept and take into account the Russian "signal" in the form of a strike by a hypersonic Oreshnik at a facility in Ukraine.

Meanwhile, the military-themed publication MWM writes that Russian industry has reached a capacity that allows it to produce about 300 IRBMs annually.



It is difficult to say on the basis of what data such conclusions were made.

The publication also reflects on the fact that the Oreshnik systems may soon be deployed on the territory of Belarus, which significantly reduces their flight time to any NATO military base in Europe. This also reduces the flight time to facilities in Kyiv – to about two and a half minutes.

Earlier, the American press published materials stating that NATO countries (and the Russian president also spoke about this) currently do not have the means to intercept the Oreshnik MRBM. That is, any launch of it at a facility in Ukraine or a base of the North Atlantic military bloc in Europe is a guaranteed defeat of the target.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    10 December 2024 06: 04
    Western experts: after combat testing of the Oreshnik MRBM in Ukraine, NATO long-range missile strikes deep into Russia have virtually ceased


    hi This is what the power of the miraculous Russian weapon does.
    If you don't understand it the first time, the second time may be your last. soldier
    1. +2
      11 December 2024 11: 13
      Quote: ZovSailor
      Western experts: after combat testing of the Oreshnik MRBM in Ukraine, NATO long-range missile strikes deep into Russia have virtually ceased


      hi This is what the power of the miraculous Russian weapon does.
      If you don't understand it the first time, the second time may be your last. soldier

      What will Taganrog say about this?
  2. +4
    10 December 2024 06: 10
    The question is... who exactly controls/manages such weapons as long-range missile systems, provided to the greenie by foreign patrons???
    It is hard to believe that the greenie himself would stop shooting them, although there were hints/statements that it takes into account the wishes of the next leader in the strip, i.e. Trump and his advisers.
    1. -2
      10 December 2024 06: 17
      The problem is that the number of sorties of our frontline aviation has decreased.
      Airplanes and helicopters are now forced to operate from airfields beyond the range of these NATO missiles. request
      That is the reality.
      The threat of attacks on our airfields, warehouses, headquarters, communication centers, and so on remains.
      1. +7
        10 December 2024 06: 45
        Quote: Lech from Android.
        The number of sorties of our frontline aviation has decreased.

        It is not true
      2. +4
        10 December 2024 11: 08
        That's interesting, above Ukrainians we laugh with their "holy Javerina", Abrams, F-16, and so on and so forth. And ourselves: Zircon scared everyone, Geranium, and now Oreshnik. And every time the West "shudders in horror". Is it really impossible to be more critical? The old truth: "it is not weapons that fight, but people", i.e. even if you have a "death star" and piss it to the fullest, then ....
      3. 0
        10 December 2024 13: 07
        Where did you get the info? Well, I don't know about the global scale, I don't have such data and the ability to get it, but from my feeling, we still fly from Vostochny. Sometimes very intensively.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +1
    10 December 2024 06: 47
    Quote: Volodin
    It is not true

    I'll be glad if this turns out to be untrue... hi I have not yet seen any confirmation of this from open sources.
    1. +1
      10 December 2024 07: 34
      You will be surprised, but this is a war, not a computer game, open sources do not say anything, just empty chatter, and almost no one except the highest level command knows what is really going on there.
  5. -3
    10 December 2024 07: 33
    What does Oreshnik have to do with it? How many of these missiles do they have? They fired a couple dozen, 90% of which were shot down, the result is close to zero, and they used half of the missiles, no effect, negative advertising is obvious, and that's what the Americans hate the most.
    1. +3
      10 December 2024 07: 53
      Quote: Victor Sergeev
      there is no effect, it's obvious bad advertising, but that's what Americans hate the most.

      I beg you... There is something wrong with this logic, otherwise why would they continue with a persistence worthy of a better application, to supply Leopards, Patriots, Hymars and so on and so forth, if in the end they are still destroyed and the negative advertising, for some reason, does not particularly bother them.
      1. +1
        10 December 2024 08: 43
        Quote: Volodin
        Something is wrong with this logic, otherwise...

        It is much more dangerous for them to admit defeat. And the negative advertising will be overshadowed by the media. History is written by the victors.
        1. +1
          10 December 2024 11: 11
          I agree with you. I'll just add: a pretty penny is trickling into the military-industrial complex, so the guys are trying.
    2. 0
      11 December 2024 11: 17
      Quote: Victor Sergeev
      What does Oreshnik have to do with it? How many of these missiles do they have? They fired a couple dozen, 90% of which were shot down, the result is close to zero, and they used half of the missiles, no effect, negative advertising is obvious, and that's what the Americans hate the most.

      Very funny. My summary:
      "The enemy launched five missiles. Four missiles were shot down, one reached its target."
      This one missile accomplished its mission.
  6. 0
    10 December 2024 11: 57
    This is not true, the only reason NATO weapons has stop striking Russia is because this long range weapons are not superweapon as advertised, the are easily intercepted and the couldn't believe this 90% interception, the more this missiles are directed to us the more we learn how to intercept them accurately, this is what NATO is very much scared of, Russia learning how to fight there superweapons
  7. +1
    10 December 2024 16: 59
    The use has come to naught, at this point in time - yes. They were not afraid of any kind of response, they simply shifted their schedule. Now they will create a decent reserve and there will be a massive raid. They do not have the habit of backing down.
  8. -2
    10 December 2024 19: 36
    In 2022, it would have been enough to strike with the Oreshniki, and the SVO would not have been needed.
    1. 0
      10 December 2024 21: 10
      Aegis Ashore Missile Defense System Opened in Poland
  9. 0
    11 December 2024 10: 16
    I wonder if Oreshnik covers not Yuzhmash, but, say, an aircraft carrier? Probably even one part out of 6 would be enough to pierce it through and through, along with all the guts.
    1. 0
      11 December 2024 11: 25
      For these purposes there is the Kinzhal, the MiG-31 carrier can be hit with an Iskander.
      1. 0
        11 December 2024 12: 22
        There's serious cover there, always nearby, you can't just get close. Iskander's radius is a bit small. Dagger - yes.
  10. 0
    11 December 2024 13: 17
    Based on the news in Europe today, the absence of shelling is due to the replacement of conventional warheads in missiles with nuclear ones.
  11. kig
    0
    12 December 2024 03: 46
    Judging by the news, someone is wrong: either our Ministry of Defense or Western experts

    topwar.ru/dannaja-ataka-ne-ostanetsja-bez-otveta-minoborony-oficialno-podtverdilo-udar-po-taganrogu-amerikanskimi-raketami-atacms
  12. +1
    12 December 2024 04: 17
    Here's an "American" who flew into Taganrog. Our guys will now express something profound at the UN, Masha will laugh, the mustachioed nanny will hum something indistinctly.