Australian Motorisation and World War II

7 389 26
Australian Motorisation and World War II
Collins Street in Melbourne circa 1930. So many cars on the streets!


This was an unexpected discovery that forced us to look at the balance of power in East Asia and the Pacific Ocean before and during World War II from a slightly different angle.



While looking through the French "Economic Bulletin of Indochina" for 1943, which, in addition to the Indochinese economy itself, also published various information about the surrounding region. And then the article "New Conditions for the Japanese Automobile Industry in East Asia", to which very interesting statistical data were attached.

The French were not lazy and collected information on the motorization of this part of the world as of the pre-war period, mainly for 1939–1940. So, the number of cars:

British Malaya - 49660
British Borneo - 317
China - 32118
French Indochina - 30916
Guam - 432
Hong Kong - 6655
Manchukuo - 12150
Dutch Indies - 76207
Philippines - 48543
Sarawak - 598
Thailand - 13518
Burma - 19038
Ceylon - 27777
India - 123400
Australia - 808500.

In total, there were 1250355 vehicles in the region, including 865528 cars, 332702 trucks and 52105 buses.
Of these, Australia accounted for 64,4% of the total number of vehicles, 67% of passenger cars and 68,6% of trucks.
Given that Australia's population was 1941 in 7109, that's one car for every 8,7 people. By comparison, China, which had a population of 1938 million in 537,3, had one car for every 16731 people.

These figures showed how big the gap in motorisation was between Australia and the rest of East Asia, which was mostly colonial or formally independent but far from self-governing. And this fact, well known at the time, had an impact on the course of events.

Cars and Roads


Although Australia is often thought of as some remote backwater where kangaroos hop, it was practically keeping pace with European countries and the United States. The first self-propelled carriage, powered by a steam engine, was constructed in Australia in 1898 by a local mechanic, David Shearer. In 1900, the first factory-made car appeared in the country - the French Di Dior, and then a stream began to flow, and by 1907 there were 3559 cars in Australia.

Along with motorization, a fairly large number of mechanics appeared, necessary for the maintenance and repair of cars, especially since the Australian roads of that time were more suitable for horse-drawn transport than for cars. In 1911, there were 3630 mechanics in Australia, including, which shocked Europeans, Australian Aborigines and women.

Australian Catholic University researcher Michael Parson, in his dissertation on stories auto business, noted that the Aborigines found a profitable niche for themselves in rural auto repair, and this happened because the Aborigines had previously entered the blacksmithing and repair of agricultural equipment. Subsequently, many auto repair shops arose precisely on the basis of forges. Well, as for women - in Australia, female emancipation was characteristic of the auto business from the very beginning. In 1921, out of 11,2 thousand mechanics, 271 were women.

In a vast country, the automobile was immediately recognized as an important means of transport. In 1922, the number of automobiles in Australia exceeded 100 units. Roads began to be built at the same time. In the early 1920s, the states created bodies responsible for the construction and maintenance of roads. In 1922, the Australian federal government passed the Public Works Act, and in 1923, the Main Roads Development Act, and began to allocate funds to support road construction. This policy was carried out until 1959.


A map of Australian roads as of about 1938. Many of the roads discussed below were not yet built.

The road network, due to geographical conditions and settlement, was formed in the southern and eastern parts of Australia, mainly between Adelaide, Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane. Already at that time a highway was built from Adelaide to the west, to Perth.

In the 1930s, when the Great Depression put many people out of work in Australia, the federal government, like many European countries, used road building to help the unemployed. There were some interesting road projects underway at the time, such as the Pacific Highway between Sydney and Brisbane, built in the early 1930s.

Or the Stuart Highway from Darwin in the north to Port Augusta in the south. The 2720 km long highway crosses the entire continent. A telegraph line was built along this route back in 1871–1872, so this road had been used for a long time. Then a railway was built from Darwin to the south, to Burdham and Alice Springs. Then they began to build a road. In December 1940, the road from Port Augusta to Alice Springs was completed, and then in April–December 1940, the road from Alice Springs to Burdham was built. The 492 km long road took 90 days; one 18 km section was built in just a week. But in March 1941, the military command demanded that the road be extended to Darwin, since the last section was almost impassable during the rainy season. This section was built by July 1942.


It must be said that roads in Australia were built seriously and with the use of equipment, in particular bulldozers


There were also monsters like the Irvine Heat Treatment Plant, which baked clay, making it possible to roll it and form a solid road base. Remnants of this monster survived until at least 2016.


Finally, the road is being concreted.

The Eyre Highway was also built between July 1941 and June 1942, running south of the existing Perth to Adelaide road. It also followed the route of a telegraph line dating back to the 1870s, but the road was built along a more convenient route.

By the start of World War II, Australia had a very well developed road network and a large number of cars.

American, British and even Japanese cars


In 1938/39, 820296 cars were registered in Australia. The vast majority, 81%, were American-made, as Henry Ford had opened an assembly plant in a disused woollen mill at Geelong in 1925, and later built a more modern and well-equipped assembly plant. General Motors had set up a number of assembly plants in Australia in 1926, in partnership with the Australian firm Holden, which initially made saddles before moving into car bodies.

Only British auto companies could compete with the Americans. There were also French and Italian manufacturers, but they had effectively lost the market since 1929. The British held about 15% of sales until the height of the Great Depression, and in 1932–1933 they even pushed the Americans aside, to 34% and 37% of sales respectively, although this was against the backdrop of a very sharp drop in sales, from 82 cars in 1927 to 10,6 in 1932. But then they managed to hold on to just over 20% of the Australian market.

The fact is that American cars, big and powerful, were most willingly bought by farmers and rural dwellers. British cars, such as the Austin 7, were more willingly bought by residents of large cities and suburbs. During the depression, British cars turned out to be more acceptable because of their low fuel consumption.


The British Austin 7: a miniature car weighing 360 kg, with a track width of 1,02 meters and an engine power of 10 hp.

Interestingly, the Japanese tried to break into the Australian market. Nissan, under a British license, produced several modifications of the Austin 7, known under the Datsun brand. The Japanese tried to export one of them to Australia, sending car kits, which in Australia were retrofitted with a number of components, such as wheels, radiators, batteries.


The Datsun Type 14 was slightly larger: 2,8 meters long, 1,2 meters wide, 600 kg in weight, and 15 hp in engine power.

Nothing came of the idea, although the first 404 Datsun Type 14s were shipped to Melbourne in late 1934. Firstly, Japanese cars were more expensive than their British counterparts. Secondly, it turned out that Japanese kits could not be assembled into a working car in Australia, since the parts were not interchangeable and the precision of their processing was not up to par. In other words, parts often had to be adjusted on site for assembly. In November 1936, sellers filed an £8 lawsuit against the Mitsubishi Trading Company, which sold Japanese cars in Australia, for simply not selling their products. Of this modification, of which 3800 units were produced, only 56 were sold in Australia and New Zealand.

The consequences of motorization for war


As we know, having many cars, a highly developed automobile industry and many technically trained people before a war is a good thing. Cars can serve the army and the military industry, automobile factories can easily switch to assembling military equipment and producing weapons and ammunition.

And the technicians. In 1940, when the Royal Australian Air Force was recruiting ground personnel, it received 56,7 applications, of which 7894 were selected to serve as technicians and ground crew. aviation personnel. This is despite the fact that there were 246 aircraft in the fleet.

Before the war, Australia trained few pilots, but under the general training program for British Commonwealth pilots, Australia trained 37500 pilots during the war.

The Australian Army, which in 1939 had a strength of 80 men (this was a militia commanded by 2800 men from the standing army), and by early 1942 was deployed with 11 infantry and 3 tank divisions to a strength of 476 people. In total, 730 people passed through the Australian army. Moreover, in this army, a corps of electrical and mechanical engineers with a strength of 28 people was created in the same year of 1942.

This is the consequence of the large-scale motorization before the war. So the Japanese could plan an invasion of Australia, but it was not going to be a cakewalk. Even if the Japanese navy fleet could establish a complete naval blockade of Australia, the Japanese forces would have to fight numerous, mobile and technically competent troops, and in a vast theater of military operations, in which control of roads would become the number one task. Without a complete blockade, the Japanese would suffer defeat in Australia in almost every case possible.
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    10 December 2024 06: 39
    Even if the Japanese Navy had been able to establish a complete naval blockade of Australia, Japanese forces would have had to fight numerous, mobile, and technologically advanced troops in a vast theater of operations in which control of roads would have become the number one objective.

    A number of factors that the respected Author did not take into account:
    1. Australia - albeit a small continent. In 1941, local authorities could simultaneously put under arms no more than 200 thousand people, of which only 90 thousand were trained and equipped. Moreover, according to the standards of the British army, only two divisions, without tanks, air defense and almost without anti-tank and divisional artillery, mortars and machine guns. All combat-ready units of "wobats" were in Britain.
    2. Concentration of population centers. The Japanese would have needed 100 ground troops to take control of the decision-making centers in the southwest of the continent. True, they would have had to create river forces and bring in 200 Koreans. But that was a matter of technique. There was no point in blockading Australia.
    I'm too lazy to write further. Much has been written about the effectiveness of Australian divisions on the Western Front and in Africa, but that was already 1942-1944. I'll just note that the Australians' uniforms and equipment were not bad.
    1. +3
      10 December 2024 10: 41
      You can't please. If you write well about the Japanese, you don't like it. If you write badly, you don't like it either. laughing
      1. -1
        10 December 2024 12: 34
        Quote: wehr
        You can't please. If you write well about the Japanese, you don't like it. If you write badly, you don't like it either. laughing

        Dmitry, you are traditionally trying to insert obviously unrealistic conclusions into material that has good content, with a claim to be analytical.
        As a specialist I write - not yours.
        In essence, you should have finished your work like this.
        "Despite the high level of cars and special transport per capita, as well as the technical literacy of the personnel, the Australian land army did not have mechanized units, armored vehicles and tanks. Armor, engines and weapons were not produced on the continent. The number of artillery guns, mortars, and communications equipment was for two divisions. In fact, by 42, 4 types of equipment were developed and ordered (3 armored cars and 1 tank). Of these, 2 were with machine gun armament. Serial deliveries began in 43.
        Taking into account the insignificant number of military aircraft, a small fleet and 4 (four!!!) coastal batteries... Dmitry continues...
        What the hell is a blockade? Capture three cities and "ales kaput".
        Well, something like that! If the Japanese needed 50 cars, they would have done it like that.
        Have a nice day!
        1. +1
          10 December 2024 14: 02
          You are trying to evaluate everything by the standards of the Red Army and the Soviet-German front. Meanwhile, the Japanese army did not have an abundance of tanks, artillery, especially heavy artillery, and in general the Japanese army is predominantly infantry. Then, the Japanese had to divide their forces between vast territories. Then there were the difficulties of delivering large quantities of equipment and heavy weapons available to Japan by sea transport.
          All together it turns out that Japan could land in Australia mainly infantry. So it turns out that infantry forces against infantry forces, but one of them, the Australians, has the ability to mobilize a lot of civilian motor transport. Which is important given the Australian distances for maneuvering forces. This is a strong advantage in this theater of military operations.
          I hope you won't argue with that?
    2. +1
      11 December 2024 14: 53
      Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
      Moreover, according to the standards of the British army, there were only two divisions, without tanks, air defense and almost without anti-tank and divisional artillery, mortars and machine guns. All combat-ready units of the "wobats" were in Britain.

      This distribution of Australian divisions lasted only until December 1941. After the start of the war with Japan, the most experienced 6th Infantry Division and the 7th Infantry Division, which had experience in capturing Syria, returned to Australia to help the 8th Infantry Division. Only the 9th Division remained in North Africa.
      Plus, the 1st Armored Division, which was still being formed in Australia, was planned to be transferred to the Middle East in December 1941 (readiness date: spring 1942).
  2. +3
    10 December 2024 07: 37
    Were armored cars produced by Australians?
    To defend your continent.
    1. +4
      10 December 2024 10: 32
      And how do you eat...
      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scout_Car_S1#:~:text=Scout%20Car%20S1%20%E2%80%94%20%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B9%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9%20%D0%BB%D1%91%D0%B3%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9,%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C%20%D0%B2%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BC%D1%91%D0%BD%20%D0%92%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B9%20%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B9%20%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B9%D0%BD%D1%8B.&text=%D0%AD%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%B6%2C%20%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BB.&text=%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE%20%D0%B2%D1%8B%D0%BF%D1%83%D1%89%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D1%85%2C%20%D1%88%D1%82.&text=Ford%20V8%2C%20%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B1%D1%8E%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9%2C%20%D0%B6%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%20%D0%BE%D1%85%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F%2C%20%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%89%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C%D1%8E%2095%20%D0%BB.
      1. +2
        10 December 2024 11: 50
        Armored Vehicles of World War II. Australia
        https://dzen.ru/a/YQTzHnWsKwhDvXYE
    2. +1
      10 December 2024 12: 09
      Quote: hohol95
      Were armored cars produced by Australians?
      To defend your continent.

      Hi guys!
      Not in 1941. Only by mid-1942 were they able to set up production of armor plates for armored cars and tanks. There were no engines or weapons of their own either. Equipment was ordered from the metropolis or the USA.
      1. +3
        10 December 2024 12: 37
        They write that they made it on the basis of Canadian trucks.
        All locally manufactured armored vehicles (on Canadian chassis) were used as training vehicles.
        They weren't sent into battle.
        1. +2
          10 December 2024 12: 55
          Quote: hohol95
          They write that they made it on the basis of Canadian trucks.
          All locally manufactured armored vehicles (on Canadian chassis) were used as training vehicles.
          They weren't sent into battle.

          Andrey, I read in a number of reference books that iron was used instead of armor on their vehicles before 1942. Sometimes by melting down ship armor. Normal armor was only received by the examples assembled abroad and after December 1942.
          However, the key word is based on Canadian trucks. Moreover, the Americans also delayed the Australian order of S7 armored vehicles. As far as I remember, in exchange for tanks.
  3. +2
    10 December 2024 09: 54
    If there had been no total blockade
    A wonderful article in the style of what would have happened if the sky had not existed, followed by comments in the same style: Kopyev, it will break.. smile
    1. +3
      10 December 2024 12: 14
      Quote: kor1vet1974
      If there had been no total blockade
      A wonderful article in the style of what would have happened if the sky had not existed, followed by comments in the same style: Kopyev, it will break.. smile

      I agree completely. However, to capture Australia, if Japan needed it. A landing of 100 thousand soldiers and 200 thousand Korean workers in Sydney would have been enough. In fact, even less effort than the Japanese spent to seize the Philippines and Malaysia.
      1. 0
        10 December 2024 12: 19
        There was no complete blockade, there wasn't... and the rest is alternative. hi
        1. 0
          10 December 2024 12: 40
          Quote: kor1vet1974
          There was no complete blockade, there wasn't... and the rest is alternative. hi

          I can only nod and say YUP, I agree!
      2. 0
        11 December 2024 09: 59
        And if the Australians didn't surrender right away, what should we do?
  4. +3
    10 December 2024 10: 41
    American cars, big and powerful, were most often bought by farmers and rural dwellers. British cars, such as the Austin 7, were most often bought by city dwellers and suburbanites.

    I wonder what kind of passenger cars were preferred by residents of rural areas and large cities of the USSR (except for the "Gnu Antelope")?
    1. -3
      10 December 2024 11: 04
      It is somewhat strange to compare the USSR with a country with almost the highest standard of living in the world.
      1. +1
        10 December 2024 11: 29
        Why not? Here is the autoUSSR of the same times:

        The morning was cool. The pale sun was tangled in the pearly sky. A small rabble of birds was screaming in the grass.


        They had been racing ahead of the motor rally for 24 hours. They were greeted with music and speeches. Children beat drums for them. Adults fed them lunches and dinners, supplied them with pre-prepared auto parts, and in one settlement they were given bread and salt on a carved oak plate with a towel embroidered with crosses.
  5. +1
    10 December 2024 20: 32
    In the first photo, according to road construction technology, it is not a bulldozer (there is no shovel in front), but a scraper (there is a bucket with a lowering bottom on a trailer at the back).
    1. +1
      11 December 2024 09: 50
      The same thought came to me when I looked at the photo)
  6. +1
    11 December 2024 11: 54
    The Australian army, which in 1939 had a strength of 80 thousand people (it was a militia, which was led by 2800 people from the standing army), and by the beginning of 1942 was deployed as part of 11 infantry and 3 tank divisions to a strength of 476 thousand people. In total, 730 thousand people passed through the Australian army. Moreover, in this army, a corps of electrical and mechanical engineers with a strength of 28 thousand people was created in the same 1942.

    These are the consequences of large-scale motorization before the war..
    Author, analytics and logic are clearly not your strongest personality traits. laughing
    1. -1
      11 December 2024 14: 01
      Well, yes, I can't, like many "onolitegi", instantly grasp the whims of the bosses laughing
      1. +1
        11 December 2024 14: 23
        Of course you don't know how, if you say that the main reason for the rapid increase in the number of infantry divisions is the presence of a large number of vehicles in Australia. laughing
        1. -1
          11 December 2024 15: 13
          Unfortunately, your brain is corrupted.
  7. 0
    14 February 2025 19: 44
    In 1900, the first factory-made car appeared in the country - the French Di Dior

    Maybe De Dion after all.