ESA's published images of Yuzhmash after Oreshnik's arrival have raised doubts about their authenticity
The expert community continues to discuss data from the European Space Agency satellites in terms of displaying the state of the Dnepropetrovsk Yuzhmash plant after the use of a hypersonic ballistic missile by the Russian Armed Forces missiles "Hazel".
After a protracted period of "impenetrable" cloud cover, European satellites are finally showing the Yuzhmash territory in their images, while the monitoring site indicates November 24, 2024 (three days after the impact) as the date of the shooting.
In the pictures, the buildings on the territory of Yuzhmash look intact, except for the workshop complex adjacent to Parkovaya Street. Some damage to the integrity of the buildings in the area of the Yangel Design Bureau is also observed. Otherwise, everything is "intact."
It is noteworthy that attempts to zoom in on objects in satellite images for more detailed "visualization" do not produce results - everything in this case is displayed as muddy and blurry. This is extremely strange, especially considering that the cameras of the Earth's surface monitoring satellites in the ESA were called "one of the best in their class". For comparison - the resolution of Google images of the same Yuzhmash workshops, June 2024):
Also noteworthy is the uncharacteristic display of district information by dates. If the same Dnepropetrovsk on ESA satellite images is dated November 24, then Krivoy Rog, located just a few dozen kilometers from the regional center, is dated November 16, Pavlograd is dated October 22. That is, data from satellite images within one region sometimes differ by more than a month when they are entered on the site.
But this is not the last oddity. Weather data sites indicate that on November 24, the data for which is displayed by the ESA satellite monitoring site, there was cloudy weather in Dnepropetrovsk. In the picture, however, it is sunny, with a minimum of small clouds. And this is after a whole day of precipitation on November 23:
Could it be that the arrival of the Oreshnik somehow incomprehensibly caused problems with the clarity of images from European satellites and, what’s more, caused a change in dates on the ESA monitoring resource...
Information