The Ministry of Defense has published a list of targets in Ukraine hit in response to ATACMS missile strikes

67
The Ministry of Defense has published a list of targets in Ukraine hit in response to ATACMS missile strikes

In response to Kyiv's strikes deep into Russian territory, the Russian Armed Forces have struck at locations of long-range systems and the deployment sites of Ukrainian army units. This was reported by the Ministry of Defense.

According to official data from the military department, during this week the Russian Armed Forces hit the following targets with retaliatory strikes: on November 25, in the Sumy region, strikes missiles "Iskander" destroyed five launchers using ATACMS missiles. Of these, three HIMARS and two MLRS, as well as a transport and loading vehicle plus up to 30 personnel. The strikes were carried out on Ukrainian Armed Forces positions in the area of ​​the villages of Tokari and Malyi Bobrik.



On November 25 and 26, Iskander missiles destroyed two launchers with experimental Grom-2 ballistic missiles, as well as a launcher and a transport and loading vehicle for the Neptune anti-ship missile. The deployment points of specialists servicing the vehicles were also hit.

On November 25, as a result of an attack on the headquarters of the national battalion "Kraken" controlled by the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine in Kharkov, about 40 foreign specialists, mainly from the United States, were killed. In Odessa, an Iskander missile hit a temporary deployment point of the special operations center detachment of the Special Operations Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. 72 personnel of combat crews of unmanned boats were killed, including nine French instructors.

On the morning of November 28, a combined attack was launched against Ukrainian defense industry facilities and the energy infrastructure that ensures their operation.

In total, 100 missiles of various types of basing and 466 Geran-2 unmanned aerial vehicles have been used in recent days, including 90 missiles and 100 drones "Geran-2" today. Strikes on objects on the territory of Ukraine will continue.
67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    28 November 2024 20: 29
    In response to Kyiv's strikes deep into Russian territory, the Russian Armed Forces have struck at locations of long-range systems and locations of Ukrainian army units, the Defense Ministry reported.

    And this is the loooong-awaited answer? What, this hasn't been done before?
    1. 0
      28 November 2024 21: 01
      Quote: Jovanni
      And this is the loooong-awaited answer? What, this hasn't been done before?

      And you open the reports and look, calculate what was done.
      First, the USSR equipment was destroyed, now NATO equipment has come. But this equipment is also starting to run out.
    2. +3
      28 November 2024 22: 01
      jovanni
      Today, 20: 29
      And this is the loooong-awaited answer? What, this hasn't been done before?

      hi Several reasons and possibilities, among others.
      Recently, many weapons have been destroyed on the border with Kursk, Bryansk, Belgorod regions and the main directions, Kurakhovsk, Krasnoarmeysk, Kharkov, Zaporozhye.
      As before, strikes were carried out on transshipment bases, warehouses, ports, airfields, including civilian ones.
      Increased intelligence and intelligence data and rapid strikes on targets.
    3. -2
      29 November 2024 10: 04
      It looks like this is the result of an agreement. After two days of launching Atacamas on our territory, logically there should be a retaliatory strike on American territory or on any of the American military bases in Europe. After thinking it over, the Americans leaked the coordinates of the launchers to us, and how else can we understand that before this, the destruction of launchers was a relative rarity, and now there are 5 of them at once. And it looks like there will be no more launches in our direction.
      1. +2
        29 November 2024 23: 49
        Jurkovs, you have an interesting version. But still, I don't think that the Americans expected us to strike their European bases. Yes, they fired missiles at them, but there is no hard evidence that they did it. Only assumptions, which is not enough against such a strong enemy. The British and the French could have been scared: another Scalp/Storm Shadow would arrive, and there would be a strike on the plant. And let them think about what to do to prevent it: persuade the Ukrainians, ask the Americans not to provide flight mission coordinates, etc. But it would have been worth firing at the plant, even just in its direction, even slightly off-target, on purpose. I think it would have worked right away. Well, maybe they would fire back once, also off-target. But once, no more. And so, with strikes on Ukraine, you won't scare them.
    4. 0
      29 November 2024 17: 34
      Quote: Jovanni
      And this is the loooong-awaited answer? What, this hasn't been done before?

      Well, of course, before that they hadn't been carried out on the territory of Ukraine at all. Did Jovanni just now wake up and, without opening his eyes, go online? He couldn't even let go of the button with the letter "O" in his sleep.
  2. +23
    28 November 2024 20: 32
    The blow was good, but again in response, and I would have liked it to be preemptive. All this is strange, to say the least. We all understand that the West will not stop the escalation. Maybe we need to take this initiative into our own hands for real at least once?
    1. +3
      28 November 2024 20: 39
      This response must be made daily and increasing in power and number of missiles and drones.
      1. +3
        28 November 2024 21: 53
        This response must be made daily and increasing in power and number of missiles and drones.

        Well, well! How come we didn't think of this before? Or maybe we just don't have the capacity to produce a thousand Iskanders a month? Although you seem to be demanding a thousand a day...
        1. -1
          28 November 2024 22: 15
          Quote: URAL72
          This response must be made daily and increasing in power and number of missiles and drones.

          Well, well! How come we didn't think of this before? Or maybe we just don't have the capacity to produce a thousand Iskanders a month? Although you seem to be demanding a thousand a day...

          A thousand Iskanders a day? what
          Oh, come on. I'm not some kind of militarist.
          But it is vitally important to produce a hundred or two missiles a day. wink
          But not just rockets. What about flowers? love
          But Geraniums need to be produced every day, one to two thousand, to bring beauty to Ukraine. love Yes
          A hundred geraniums a day is not enough for Ukraine. crying
          1. -1
            29 November 2024 05: 34
            About 10 geraniums are made per day
      2. 0
        29 November 2024 05: 32
        100 missiles a day is not possible
    2. +5
      28 November 2024 21: 36
      Quote: al3x
      This is all strange, to say the least.

      Most likely, these installations were detected at the moment of missile launch, and then they were followed without giving them time to hide.
      1. +4
        28 November 2024 21: 45
        Yes, it's a working version. These hoholtkvari, with their owners, have completely lost their fear, we need to remind them constantly. Of course, it's always better to be proactive, but it doesn't always work that way.
        1. 0
          29 November 2024 18: 03
          Quote: ideo098
          Of course, it is always better to be proactive, but this does not always work out.

          Unfortunately, that's life.
    3. AAK
      +3
      28 November 2024 22: 22
      For a preemptive strike (at the moment of redeployment and reaching firing positions), our technical reconnaissance capabilities are still weak, especially in terms of the availability of AWACS and ASBU systems, which process signatures in various ranges and from various detection systems in online mode to provide target designation to our weapons.
      1. +2
        28 November 2024 22: 48
        For preemptive strikes, intelligence is enough. They say there are many corrupt officials in Ukraine, but apparently our people have already stolen the money to bribe them.
      2. 0
        29 November 2024 13: 11
        Damantsev E. remembered...
    4. 0
      29 November 2024 17: 42
      Quote: al3x
      The blow was good, but again in response, and I would have liked it to be preemptive.

      For this, intelligence must work quickly. Not every ATACMS launcher is watched by a "Stirlitz". And on the other side there are specialists in camouflage and counterintelligence.
    5. 0
      Yesterday, 12: 14
      Quote: al3x
      The blow was good, but again in response, and I would have liked it to be preemptive.

      Strikes are carried out constantly and daily, including preemptively as intelligence data comes in, regardless of the strikes on our territory. It's just that bloggers who post such articles want to, for the sake of beautiful headlines, emphasize that "revenge will be terrible." And here some, having read that all our strikes are only responses and not having bothered to scroll through the entire history of our strikes on the Bandar-logs, are indignant that we seem to be doing nothing, sitting quietly and only occasionally responding.
  3. +8
    28 November 2024 20: 33
    After such a "response" the transfer of JASSM and Griffins became inevitable....
    1. 0
      28 November 2024 22: 52
      In response, the enemies appointed General Muradov deputy commander of the ground forces. Apparently for his services to Ukraine in inflicting maximum damage on our troops.
  4. +4
    28 November 2024 20: 34
    The fact that the strikes are effective should be seen in the Western media - negotiations are needed, it sounds from every iron. Now they are taking us for a show-off, and it will end for them like in Afghanistan. There is one problem, though, it is necessary to neutralize the second echelon of the West, it is always not the military-industrial complex that wins, but the organizers of wars. They need to be driven out of Ukraine - they will start shoving papers under our noses - we are the owners of all of Ukraine. That is the problem.
    1. 0
      28 November 2024 21: 02
      Quote: tralflot1832
      We need to drive them out of Ukraine - they will start shoving papers under our noses - we are the owners of all of Ukraine. That's the problem.
      What papers? What are you talking about?
      1. +1
        28 November 2024 21: 06
        Papers - we are the owners of this enterprise. US Armed Forces from Afghanistan, but industrial business remained in Afghanistan. The Pentagon does not command in the USA - it is just a tool.
        1. +6
          28 November 2024 21: 27
          Quote: tralflot1832
          Papers - we are the owners of this enterprise.

          The owner of the land will change, so all the owners of the enterprises will have to re-register them according to Russian legislation. And those who re-register will be obliged to work according to our legislation and pay taxes to the Russian budget. Many may not want to. But it will be like with Yukos. The Constitution has changed: Russian legislation has priority over international legislation. Only Russian laws apply on Russian territory.
          1. +3
            28 November 2024 22: 28
            How do the laws of the capitalist Russian Federation differ from those of other bourgeois states?
            The bourgeois works "honestly", pays taxes honestly - be it to Ukraine, or the USA, or the Russian Federation, he doesn't give a damn who he pays taxes to.
            The Russian Federation is not the USSR, where everything belonged to the people and the bourgeois would have to say goodbye to his property.
            1. 0
              29 November 2024 05: 24
              Quote: ugol2
              The bourgeois works "honestly", pays taxes honestly - be it to Ukraine, or the USA, or the Russian Federation, he doesn't give a damn who he pays taxes to.

              Holy simplicity!!! What Soros taught you this?! Just take a quick look at the concession agreements... The bourgeois doesn't care at all... otherwise his state (the USA) wouldn't defend him with the force of its armed forces.
            2. +2
              29 November 2024 08: 18
              Quote: ugol2
              How do the laws of the capitalist Russian Federation differ from those of other bourgeois states?

              There are differences. For example, Russia is not obliged to observe EU laws on its territory. But if Ukraine joins the EU, the first law it will have to comply with will be the law on restitution - that is, the return of property to the owners who had this property on its territory before the revolution. And these are the Poles, Germans, French... And it will be like in the Baltics and Poland. Up to eviction from apartments in which Ukrainians were born. That is, anyone who has kept the documents will be able to take away property from a Ukrainian.
  5. +21
    28 November 2024 20: 37
    In response to the American missile attack, the Americans received the answer: they will not be attacked, but their puppet will suffer.
    Well. A good answer, thought the Americans. They breathed a sigh of relief. And went to prepare new coordinates.
  6. -2
    28 November 2024 20: 40
    Quote: Jovanni
    In response to Kyiv's strikes deep into Russian territory, the Russian Armed Forces have struck at locations of long-range systems and locations of Ukrainian army units, the Defense Ministry reported.

    And this is the loooong-awaited answer? What, this hasn't been done before?

    They also promised to polish it with Oreshnik
  7. 0
    28 November 2024 20: 43
    It seems that General Konashenkov hasn't been heard from for a long time.
    1. -1
      28 November 2024 20: 59
      It seems that General Konashenkov hasn't been heard from for a long time.
      Trying on the uniform of an army general.
    2. -1
      28 November 2024 21: 35
      It seems that General Konashenkov hasn't been heard from for a long time.

      He wasn't really heard from before either, so where did Apti Alludinov disappear to? We haven't heard from him for a long time.
      1. -1
        28 November 2024 23: 10
        I don't know, maybe the account was hacked. It's unlikely that it will be banned. DAM doesn't even get banned on Twitter.
    3. +1
      30 November 2024 12: 27
      Wow‼️ that's who comes to mind
  8. 0
    28 November 2024 21: 00
    If you turn on logic, then this is all noodles, IMHO.
    There are, say, 100 calibers of us.
    The Ukrainians didn't launch missiles (as it was 2.5 years ago). Result: we hit with 100 calibers.
    And did the Ukrainians launch missiles? Result: we hit with 100 calibers.

    As in the sketch: if there is no difference, then someone is clearly fooling themselves...
    IMHO
  9. +4
    28 November 2024 21: 16
    After such "answers" there are even more questions...
  10. -5
    28 November 2024 21: 28
    It's not enough for the doomsayers! I say: I love it!
  11. -1
    28 November 2024 21: 37
    What kind of sovereign state is this that doesn't even want to defend itself with a primitive strike, that doesn't want to show everyone that it can't be treated like that, and doesn't even destroy the enemy's leaders? The US military-industrial complex has taken off, money is pouring in there like a stream, it's pouring in into space like a stream.
  12. +6
    28 November 2024 21: 48
    There he is - in response... And if they had just stood there and not shot, would they have been destroyed or not? And was it worth it to start all this first, and then "in response" like this?
  13. 0
    28 November 2024 21: 49
    Joke: Spiegel has thrown out all the sections about the war that could be clicked on. All news concerning military actions in Ukraine is now in the Ausland/Russland section

    spiegel.de/ausland/russland-ukraine-krieg-wladimir-putin-droht-mit-angriffen-auf-regierungsgebaeude-in-ukraine-a-8d04e649-881f-4e2a-a55a-2111c5a0bab8
  14. +1
    28 November 2024 22: 04
    Long live such internationalism and friendship between nations! It is especially gratifying to read about the Americans and the frog exterminators.
  15. +14
    28 November 2024 22: 34
    Someone should explain: soon three years of "strikes" will be delivered. The energy sector is not entirely healthy, but it is quite alive. Production, primarily military, somehow works. The old Soviet equipment was knocked out, but they did not weaken much because of this. And NATO equipment can be destroyed at this rate for many more years. No one is swelling with hunger. As a techie, I ask, is the efficiency of this activity much different from zero? As a chemical engineer who has worked in production for more than 40 years, I can say: all their petrochemicals can be multiplied by 0 in a couple of weeks, you can’t disguise it. As well as high-voltage systems. What does our management want? I don’t understand.
    1. +2
      29 November 2024 00: 07
      Everything that was done could have been worked out in the first half of 2022. So who would we then resolve the issue with? With Biden?
      No-o-o... The question here has a deeper basis.
  16. -1
    28 November 2024 22: 35
    Well done, the main thing is not to stop there. Zipsota, the white ribbon abomination (may you die) and honest suckers from among our turbopatriots - advocating for direct strikes on the Americans and small-timers because of the use of their missiles and participation in the guidance, we need to remember the war in Vietnam. The Americans knew that we were supplying air defense systems, there were our instructors in Vietnam who were shooting down Yankees planes. As well as the participation of Chinese specialists and weapons. But they did not strike either the USSR or China. Everything is still within the framework of the unspoken rules of the game.
  17. +2
    28 November 2024 22: 39
    Today there was a good attack using a wide range of missiles and drones, which further hit the very weakened Ukrainian energy system, and these attacks must continue.
  18. +4
    28 November 2024 22: 43
    "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
  19. +5
    28 November 2024 22: 54
    In response to Kyiv's strikes deep into Russian territory, the Russian Armed Forces struck at locations where long-range systems were deployed and at locations of Ukrainian army units.

    Why “in response” and not in the process of routine work?
  20. +4
    28 November 2024 23: 18
    Meanwhile, Hezbollah has already had a new leader, I don’t even know which one, since the beginning of the fighting.
  21. +1
    29 November 2024 00: 22
    Russian Armed Forces strike locations of long-range weapons of the Ukrainian Armed Forces
    https://news-front.su/2024/11/28/vs-rf-udarili-po-mestam-razmeshheniya-dalnobojnogo-oruzhiya-vsu/
  22. +4
    29 November 2024 02: 57
    Well, of course, the Ministry of Defense, if the stars aligned, would have given out everything that happened during the whole year or two as a "retaliatory response"... No one doubts anymore that there will be no response except snot. Well, maybe they'll hit Kiev, but otherwise...
  23. +2
    29 November 2024 03: 20
    I would like to see a response for the invasion of the Kursk region and the murder of civilians.
  24. P
    +3
    29 November 2024 06: 01
    What's the point of killing the perpetrators? Maybe a couple dozen torn Kolomoiskys or Medvedchuks, or at least their managers on enemy territory would help the cause, huh?)
  25. -3
    29 November 2024 07: 04
    Quote: Bearded
    This response must be made daily and increasing in power and number of missiles and drones.

    As soon as Marshal Borodach supplies the necessary amount of missiles and UAVs to the Armed Forces, Marshal Borodach will give the order, and Marshal Borodach will strike back daily, with increasing force and quantity of missiles and drones. In the meantime, Marshal Borodach can only strike with pluses to the bearded men who give each other pluses for such voices crying in the wilderness.
  26. -3
    29 November 2024 07: 14
    Quote: BoyCat
    spiegel.de/ausland/russland-ukraine-krieg-wladimir-putin-droht-mit-angriffen-auf-regierungsgebaeude-in-ukraine-a-8d04e649-881f-4e2a-a55a-2111c5a0bab8


    See the Comments of the Urapatriots to Volume 20 of the Cunning Plan of the SVO. Page 70. These people know everything.
  27. -1
    29 November 2024 07: 19
    Quote: Vasyan1971
    In response to Kyiv's strikes deep into Russian territory, the Russian Armed Forces struck at locations where long-range systems were deployed and at locations of Ukrainian army units.

    Why “in response” and not in the process of routine work?

    With a hint like: "don't hit us in the... we won't hit you in the...."?
  28. +4
    29 November 2024 08: 47
    The key phrase of the military-political leadership of Russia is "in response", and when strikes on Ukrainian targets will not be in response but at least as a "warning". And what about the "sacred cows", I mean the bridges across the Dnieper?
  29. +2
    29 November 2024 09: 09
    And where is the "Oreshnik" strike on the decision-making center, on Bankova Street in Kyiv????!!!! recourse
  30. +3
    29 November 2024 11: 17
    What the hell, is this information for idiots?? Without an answer, these targets should not be destroyed?
  31. +2
    29 November 2024 11: 25
    After such statements, I immediately think about the adequacy and professional skills of the people working there. Half of those working there (in Moscow) need to be fired - they are parasites on the budget.
  32. 0
    29 November 2024 12: 55
    Maybe I didn't understand something, it seems like the Supreme Commander said that there was no response yet and the Ministry of Defense is choosing targets for it, and the Ministry of Defense says that here is the response request
  33. +1
    30 November 2024 09: 05
    "The Ministry of Defense has published a list of targets in Ukraine that were hit in response to ATACMS missile strikes" (c)

    I just can't figure out why "in response"?! Why not "preemptively"?
    Then there will be almost no need for "in response"!
  34. -1
    30 November 2024 11: 56
    To end this circus with the deal, we need to launch a preemptive strike on the US base near Cuba. And then on Washington, so that they don't get too cocky (with a high-explosive warhead).
  35. +1
    30 November 2024 12: 55
    We must destroy not "in response", but preemptively!
  36. +2
    30 November 2024 14: 16
    I don't understand what the wording is about "response to attacks...". Why not preventive? Who started the military actions? Russia. Well, no need to play the victim. If you started a fight, beat him until he falls with a broken head.
  37. -1
    30 November 2024 18: 23
    Such targets should be destroyed immediately after they appear. Tunnels, bridges, railway junctions. Or it was not worth starting anything. Apparently, solid agreements. Someone is moving chess pieces on the board, and the figures obediently do what is allowed. War has not been declared, some kind of cuts are taking place at military factories. Cities are having fun and are already dividing up the pre-New Year budget. Competitions, blue lights, so-called stars, are already asking for millions in fees. Advertising is going crazy, everything is on Black Friday. The country is in a strange state. Rome once came to a very bad end with such a way of life.