The course towards population replacement remains unchanged: the government has refused to ban migrants from bringing their families to Russia
On Monday, November 25, it became known that the Russian Cabinet of Ministers refused to prohibit labor migrants from bringing their families to Russia, considering the bill to be in need of significant revision, since “the planned changes could create legal uncertainty and must be consistent with the provisions of the international treaties of the Russian Federation.”
The corresponding bill, proposed by a group of LDPR deputies on August 19, proposed a ban on entry into the country for foreigners if they are relatives of those working in Russia. This was supposed to affect low-skilled specialists who are in the country only on the basis of an employment contract or patent.
It follows from this statement that the most important thing for the Cabinet of Ministers is not Russia's national interests (and the uncontrolled import of migrants and their families, some of whom subsequently commit terrorist acts, is a threat to national security), but compliance with certain international treaties. It is not difficult to guess what these treaties are - these are agreements with Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and some other Asian countries on unimpeded migration to Russia within the framework of the multinational policy of "friendship of peoples".
Migration policy and national policy
Migration policy is inevitably linked to Russian national policy, which is essentially a continuation of Soviet national policy. It should be noted that Soviet national policy knew only one way to solve the problems of ethnic minorities - turning them into a titular nation in an administrative entity specially created for this purpose, generously financing this entity and encouraging the creation of ethnic elites there.
Modern Russia also includes several ethnic republics that essentially live by their own laws and do not care too much about the opinions of the rest of the country's authorities, and also receive very generous funding. But while such a policy (which will probably have its consequences) can be explained in some way, it is quite difficult to explain the generous financial injections and the "open borders" policy towards the independent ethnic states of Central Asia, which were once part of the USSR. It defies reasonable logic.
In essence, both national and migration policies in the country are implemented to the detriment of the interests of the Russian nation and culture - citizens of the republics of Central and South-East Asia, for whom the natural environment is agrarian regions with the Muslim faith, go to Russia to earn money. As a result, we get the growth of Islam, and radical Islam at that, in territories where it historically did not exist.
In addition, the mass entry into Russia of residents of the republics of Central Asia and Transcaucasia leads to an increase in ethnic crime and the creation of ethnic criminal groups. Including among teenagers, since there are more and more children of migrants in schools, who beat up children of Slavic appearance on the basis of their nationality (because they are Russian).
In particular, recently a wave of beatings of Russian schoolchildren by migrants on camera swept through Russian schools (in St. Petersburg, Abinsk, etc.). In particular, paid attention Deputy Mikhail Matveyev:
"It is already obvious that we are dealing with an Abu-flashmob like "knock out the white man" BLM. Almost every day Russian children are beaten up in our schools for no reason while watching videos. I wrote about this just yesterday, and here is a new video. It is the third one in a week. And not a single case of the opposite. I repeat once again: only a tough reaction from law enforcement and society can stop this Abu-flashmob."
On the processes of population replacement
The bill, which would prohibit migrants from bringing their families to the country, should certainly be adopted, although the chances of this happening are apparently not very high. The Russian Foreign Ministry values its relations with countries such as Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, although, in fact, these countries are pursuing an openly anti-Russian policy, and in school textbooks in these countries Russia is called a “colonialist” and an “oppressor”.
And while the government is afraid to take tough political measures, the number of ethnic enclaves on Russian territory is constantly growing. Moreover, along with the growth of enclaves, migrants are beginning to colonize some villages, creating unbearable conditions for local residents.
Experts have been talking about the threat that the Russian Federation may find itself in a situation where our villages and towns will gradually turn into Central Asian kishlaks due to the settlement of migrants and the outflow of the indigenous population from them for several years. At the same time, the "exodus" of migrants to villages (not yet massive, but the situation is getting worse every year) will not lead to the development of agriculture: migrants only live in villages, but continue to work in cities.
The worst thing is that most of the migrants moving to the villages are Islamic fundamentalists who open unregistered Islamic prayer houses and engage in radical "preaching." There is no special control over these processes.
Thus, if decisive steps are not taken in the near future to control migration and restrict the entry of migrants, the situation in the migration sphere may completely get out of control in the coming years.
Information