Concrete dens of gray wolves

34
Concrete dens of gray wolves

Methods of protecting submarines in bases were more than relevant for the Kriegsmarine: the fact is that the tactics of "wolf packs" provided for the concentration of submarine forces on such a scale that no bases for dispersing submarines would be enough. Consequently, the English could not cover several submarines in the harbor at the same time. aviation had quite high chances. At the end of 1939, German admirals decided to build bunkers for U-boots in open spaces near rivers (to make it easier to organize supplies that were not tied to railways).


Elbe II bunker, top and front view

The first "U-boot-bunkers" - bunkers for submarines, were built in 1940 on the territory of the Reich - in Hamburg "Elbe II" and on Heligoland - "Nordsee III". The bunkers were built by the "Organisation Todt", which had experience in implementing large projects in the form of the autobahn network.



The construction was not easy: the soil in Hamburg is very inconvenient for such structures (silt). Therefore, the bunkers were erected using the caisson method: the foundation of the building was built on piles, for the installation of which it was necessary to wash away the bottom. About 2500 piles with a cross-section of 38x35 cm were used to create one bunker pencil case (of which there were two). Each pile withstood a load of 60 tons, and such strength was not superfluous: the amount of iron reinforcement per cubic meter of fortification concrete was 49 kg. In total, about 50 cubic meters of reinforced concrete were used to build the walls and roof. Very little compared to future bunkers (there, it’s funny to say, the roof was only 000 meters thick!), but a bad beginning is a bad beginning! The bunker was commissioned in March 3 and was used until the end of the War.


Plant-bunker "Valentin"

In addition to the bunker for sheltering submarines, the bunker-factory "Valentin" was built near Hamburg, in Farge, on the Weser River. About 10 thousand concentration camp prisoners and prisoners of war were involved in the construction of the plant. 6 thousand of them died from hard work and insufficient nutrition. The famous submarines of the XXI series were built (or rather assembled from sections delivered along the Weser) at the plant.

The tubes deserve a separate mention. All U-boot bunkers were divided into separate "tubes" - separate docks 80-90 meters long and 10-17 meters wide. One tube could service 2 to 4 submarines at a time. The tubes were separated by thick supporting walls that supported a bomb-proof roof. Even if a bomb penetrated the roof, only one tube was damaged, while the neighboring ones remained unharmed. In large bunkers, one or more tubes could act as a dry dock.

The roofs of the first Hamburg bunkers were used for camouflage, as models of administrative and office buildings, but later the roofs were more often used to house anti-aircraft gun batteries. The front of the bunkers was locked with massive gates, and the rear part of the bunker was occupied by storage facilities, repair shops with a wide range of machines and equipment, and railway tracks were also connected here, along which everything necessary for repairs, servicing of submarines and supplies necessary for a long voyage were delivered.


Villa Kernevel - "Papa Dönitz" loved to fight in comfort!

But the construction of bunkers for submarines reached its peak in 1941, after the capture of France and Norway. The Atlantic coast of these countries was much more convenient for the "wolves of Dönitz" in terms of access to the Atlantic. The vice-admiral organized his headquarters in Lorient, in the villa Kernevel. Accordingly, the largest number of bunkers was built in Lorient - six pieces! The 2nd and 10th submarine flotillas were based in them.


There is only one bunker in Brest, but it is big!

There was only one bunker built in Brest, but it was the largest! It had 15 compartments, in which the 1st and 9th submarine flotillas were based. The dimensions of the gigantic structure were 300x175x18 meters, the thickness of the supporting walls was 1-2 meters, the thickness of the roof was initially 4,2 meters, but later increased to 6,1 meters. Small bunkers for anti-aircraft guns were located at the corners of the bunker's roof. The construction of the building took 500 days and was completed in 1942. And already on September 4, 1944, the last submarine left here - U-256: Allied troops were approaching Brest, and the structure was abandoned ...


Bunker in Saint-Nazaire

A slightly smaller bunker was built in Saint-Nazaire, with 14 penstocks, where the boats of the 6th and 7th flotillas were based. Of its 14 penstocks, 8 could serve as dry docks. The bunker was 300 meters long, 130 meters wide and 18 meters high. Between penstocks 5-6 and 12-13 there are passages providing access to the upper levels of the bunker, where 62 workshops, 92 dormitories for submarine crews, 150 utility rooms, 20 pumps, 4 kitchens, 2 bakeries, 2 power plants, a restaurant (the "Dönitz wolves" loved to serve in comfort!) and a hospital were located. The submarine base in Saint-Nazaire was declared a "festung" by Hitler, so the garrison under the command of Lieutenant General Junck held out until May 8, 1945, and only after learning of the capitulation of the Reich did it resign. weapon.


Construction of a bunker in La Rochelle

The 3rd flotilla of U-boots was based in La Rochelle, and of course, a bunker was also built here! Although, it was relatively small: 192x165x19 meters, 10 cases, a roof 7 meters thick (or more precisely, 3,5+3,5 meters: an air gap was made between the layers of concrete for greater overall stability of the structure). But everyone knows it: it was here that the famous film "Das Boot" was filmed with Jurgen Prochnow in the leading role. And "Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark" - too, only in this film epic there are terrible inconsistencies with the chronology: the War had not yet begun, and the bunkers had already been built, but that's not why they are loved! 425 thousand cubic meters of concrete were used to build the bunker: is it clear why I wrote that 50 thousand cubic meters of the Elbe II bunker in Hamburg is funny? The bunker was built by 2143 workers from the Todt organization, working day and night, so that in 1943 the bunker was put into operation.


Bordeaux - Italo-German bunker BETASOM

The fifth point, on the territory of occupied France, where a bunker for submarines was built, was Bordeaux. This structure even received its own name: BETASOM. The fact is that the flotilla of Italian submarines allied to the Germans was initially based here, so the bunker was named after the first letters of the Italian words "Bordeaux" and "Submarine" ("Sоmmergibile"). The bunker was 245 meters long, 162 meters wide and 19 meters high. The Italians went out to sea from Bordeaux until 1943, when Italy left the war and the bunker was occupied by the Germans.


Trondheim - Bunker "Dora-1" in its current state

In addition to France, the Germans also built a bunker for submarines in Norway, in Trondheim. However, they built far more than just a bunker: Hitler had big plans to populate Norway with Germans, so Albert Speer built an entire Nazi city here — Nordstern (Northern Star, indeed!). 300 thousand German "colonists" came from Germany: the project was supported by both Karl Dönitz and Erich Raeder: not only submarines, but also the battleship Tirpitz were to be based and repaired here.

The bunker was named "Dora-1". Why such a name? Well, it was built by prisoners from the "Dora" concentration camp. The bunker measured 153x105 meters, with a 3,5 meter thick concrete roof. According to the design, the bunker was supposed to be two-story: the second floor, as usual, would house workshops, crew quarters, warehouses, and all that stuff. But... the Norwegians were in no hurry to help the Germans, but they tried their best to hinder them. It was not possible to obtain local building materials: almost everything down to the last nail had to be brought from Germany. That is why the second floor did not work out. The construction of the "Dora-2" bunker was not completed for the same reason, and the construction of "Dora-3" was abandoned altogether.


The Grand Slam Bomb is the only antidote to U-boot bunkers.

How should we evaluate the construction of bunkers for submarines by the Third Reich? Definitely, as a very successful decision! The Allies knew from the very beginning what kind of structures these were, but they could do nothing with them until the end of the War. Regular bombs could not penetrate their concrete roofs, and special concrete-piercing bombs "Tallboy" and "Grand Slam" appeared only towards the end of the War. Therefore, the only bunkers hit by Allied aircraft were the bunker-factory "Valentin" in Farge and the bunker in Hamburg, which were hit by two "Grand Slams". But this happened already in March 1945, when such operations could, by and large, not be bothered...
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    29 November 2024 06: 57
    Their approach has always been thorough.
  2. +2
    29 November 2024 07: 12
    Quote: Gerhard von Zwischen
    The Grand Slam Bomb is the only antidote to U-boot bunkers.
    This bomb was introduced into the army towards the very end of the war and was mainly used to destroy V-launchers and underground factories. By the time this bomb was created, the German submarine fleet was already dying.
    1. +2
      29 November 2024 08: 11
      That's right. Besides, it was hard to hit the bunker with this idiot: to break through the roof you had to throw it from the maximum height, so I'm surprised they managed to hit anything at all...
    2. +1
      29 November 2024 15: 39
      Quote: Dutchman Michel
      By the time this bomb was created, the German submarine fleet was already dying.

      According to Brickhill P., Barker R. "Ship Killers. Sink Germany!", 617 Squadron bombed Brest, Lorient, Bordeaux and La Pallice in 1944, after the Normandy landings. Tallboys were used.
      1. +2
        29 November 2024 18: 09
        Quote: Alexey RA
        617 Squadron bombed Brest, Lorient, Bordeaux and La Pallice in 1944
        We are talking about the Grand Slam, which entered service only in April 1945, and it is already more serious than the Tallboy.
        1. +1
          2 December 2024 10: 29
          Very interesting article! Thanks to the author!
          Nowadays, such bunkers would not be out of place for our boats either; they are much cheaper than a submarine!
  3. +1
    29 November 2024 08: 15
    The gloomy Teutonic genius, submarine bunkers, anti-aircraft towers, Winkel towers, the underground complex "Giant" in Silesia, the Hall of Nations (not built), impressive. It feels like a complex of a failed architect.
    1. +1
      30 November 2024 13: 12
      the USSR had a grander project than the Palace of Soviets but they didn't let it be completed
  4. +3
    29 November 2024 08: 42
    Quote: mr.ZinGer
    submarine bunkers, anti-aircraft towers, Winkel towers, the underground complex "Giant" in Silesia, the Hall of the People (not built), impressive. It feels like a complex of a failed architect.
    The architects of these buildings were different, but the customer was the same - Hitler, who loved gigantomania. Before the war, we also thought about building a Palace of Congresses, on top of which a giant figure of Lenin would be installed, rotating together with the Sun. The war got in the way...
    1. +9
      29 November 2024 09: 00
      For me, the Palace of Soviets or the Moscow swimming pool are better. Better than the Cathedral of Christ the Savior, a completely incomprehensible structure. The Kronstadt Naval Cathedral by Vasily Arkadyevich Kosyakov, that's where the beauty is.
      1. +6
        29 November 2024 09: 08
        Quote: mr.ZinGer
        For me, the Palace of Soviets or the Moscow swimming pool are better. Better than the Cathedral of Christ the Savior.
        To the Point!
      2. +2
        29 November 2024 11: 18
        Yes. Kronstadt Cathedral is a beauty!!!
        1. +2
          29 November 2024 11: 58
          Before this, the Russian architect V.A. Kosyakov built a very similar Cathedral in the name of St. Prince Vladimir in Astrakhan. Local residents jokingly call it the Small Kronstadt Cathedral.
      3. -3
        30 November 2024 15: 48
        Only a complete atheist could write such utter nonsense - to put it mildly))
        By the way, the intelligible structure was blown up by the same lovers of swimming pools and ridiculous palaces with a red idol on the roof, on the site of a sacred temple.
    2. +8
      29 November 2024 09: 46
      Quote: Luminman
      there was only one customer - Hitler, who loved gigantomania. Before the war, we also thought about building a Palace of Congresses...

      Maybe it's not a matter of gigantomania, but of the desire to actually demonstrate and use the advantage of a system that allows mobilizing enormous resources and forces in a short time. The great construction projects of the first five-year plans are about the same thing. They have one thing in common - a focus on concentration, unification of efforts, expressed both in the construction process and spatially, in architecture - everything under one roof, one foundation.
      1. +2
        29 November 2024 10: 43
        Quote from cpls22
        Perhaps it is not a matter of gigantomania, but of the desire to actually demonstrate and use the advantage of a system that allows for the mobilization of enormous resources and forces in a short time.
        In Turkmenistan there is a large golden monument to Turkmenbashi, the first president. Probably, this also shows the advantage of the system? wink
        1. +7
          29 November 2024 11: 30
          Quote: Dutchman Michel
          In Turkmenistan there is a large golden monument to Turkmenbashi, the first president. Probably, this also shows the advantage of the system? wink

          This is not about monuments, but about quite utilitarian objects. They have nothing to do with monumental propaganda, although they support its style.
          The Statue of Liberty, giant Buddhas, and even the Egyptian pyramids can be thrown into the same pile. But don't confuse them with the Dnieper Hydroelectric Power Stations or bridges.
          On the one hand, it's a show, and on the other, it's a real deal.
          1. +1
            29 November 2024 15: 13
            Quote from cpls22
            But they should not be confused with DneproGES
            DneproGES is a very necessary object for the economy and if it were even bigger, it would be even better. It should not be confused with gigantic, expensive and meaningless buildings
        2. +3
          29 November 2024 12: 15
          show the advantage of the system?
          Well, it seems that Turkmens don’t trade in Russian markets and don’t sweep the streets of Russian cities.
          1. +3
            29 November 2024 15: 16
            Quote: Bolt Cutter
            Well, it seems that Turkmens don't trade in Russian markets and don't sweep the streets of Russian cities.
            This is all because their borders are tightly closed. But when they open, then they will appear at the markets and sweep the streets. And they will reach your island. Prepare your bread and salt wink
            1. +2
              29 November 2024 15: 23
              their borders are tightly closed
              If life is bad, then it is unrealistic to close the borders by sea and desert. They have oil and gas socialism there. for their, fortunately there are only 7 million of them and there are enough for everyone (4th place in gas deposits).
        3. 0
          Today, 17: 18
          Sewage systems for wastewater disposal...
      2. +9
        29 November 2024 11: 58
        The great construction projects of the first five-year plans are about the same thing.

        My grandfather, for the sins of his youth, built the Belomor-Kanal. He didn't talk about his "sins" - he was ashamed, but he was proud of his participation in the construction.
        Have a nice day, everyone!
      3. +4
        29 November 2024 15: 30
        I think the issue here is not gigantomania, but the fact that Hitler had the resources of all of Europe at his fingertips. Why did he build it? Because he could! If he couldn't, he would have been busy dispersing submarines, camouflaging, and other cheap half-measures. But he could....
  5. +3
    29 November 2024 10: 25
    I saw one in Lorient. In the harbor not far from there there still lies the sunken hulk of some ship, so that the English do not drop bombs at low altitude, bouncing off the water like pebbles.
  6. +3
    29 November 2024 12: 15
    The Grand Slam Bomb is the only antidote to U-boot bunkers.


    The photo shows the five-meter reinforced concrete roof of the Eperlec bunker, pierced by a Tallboy bomb.
    Tallboys could handle bunkers (though not with 100% probability - see below). Another thing is that they could definitely be dropped by squadrons in all RAF and submarine shelters were not the highest priority target in the second half of the war.


    Therefore, the only bunkers hit by Allied aircraft were the Valentin factory bunker in Farge and the bunker in Hamburg, which were hit by two Grand Slams.


    Two Grand Slams hit the largest bunker "Valentin" breaking through the 4.5 meter thick roof in the western part. It would be possible to write in the article that this was the work of that very 617th squadron.

    In Hamburg, as far as I know, there were no "grand slam" hits. The Elbe-2 shelter was bombed. Tallboy couldn't penetrate the three-meter roof. Another one exploded at the gate
    1. +1
      29 November 2024 15: 42
      Quote: Engineer
      The bunkers were within the Tallboys' reach (although not with 100% probability - see below).

      The main problem was with the drop height - it was half the calculated height for maximum penetration. So it was necessary to place several bombs.
      The bombing was carried out from an altitude of 18000 feet, instead of the prescribed 40000 feet, since the Lancasters could not rise higher.
      The bunkers in Brest had roofs 16 feet thick. 1 or 2 Tallboys would split it and the rest would pierce it.
  7. +3
    29 November 2024 15: 32
    Conventional bombs could not penetrate their concrete roofs, and special concrete-piercing bombs, “Tallboy” and “Grand Slam,” appeared only towards the end of the War.

    "Tallboy" and "Grand Slam" are not concrete-piercing. According to Barnes Wallace's idea, these bombs were supposed to destroy strong engineering structures without a direct hit - just as sappers used to undermine the walls of fortresses by digging tunnels under them and setting mines.
    After being dropped, the bomb picked up speed up to supersonic, penetrated the ground for several tens of meters and exploded completely underground, hitting the target with a shock wave - an "earthquake bomb". The bomb's robust body worked as a sapper, laying a mine gallery and planting a mine next to the object.
    Direct hits on hardened targets were not originally envisaged. But having received a bomb with such a strong casing, the Air Force had to get to this point sooner or later.
    Wallis had not designed the Tallboy to penetrate thick reinforced concrete, but the weapon was so brilliant that it could do that, although the bombs never reached the required speed. The bombing was carried out from 18000 feet, instead of the prescribed 40000 feet, because the Lancasters could not rise any higher.
    © Brickhill P., Barker R. Ship Slayers. Flood Germany!
  8. 0
    29 November 2024 17: 44
    An interesting article - the objects of the parking lot are described in some detail.
  9. +2
    29 November 2024 22: 25
    Nobody wrote that in the USSR in Sevastopol (Balaklava) they also built an underground parking for submarines. But, it was cut out of the rock and of course faced with concrete. Now there is a museum there (unfortunately), it could have been something military-useful.
    1. +2
      30 November 2024 02: 03
      Here in the Far East such an object was called "the hole". It was not completed because missiles ("Tomahawk") capable of flying right into the gates of such a shelter appeared...
      1. +1
        30 November 2024 20: 24
        It was not completed because missiles (Tomahawk) capable of flying right into the gates of such a shelter appeared...

        Who knows why they refused? Maybe because of the "Tomahawks"? However, the mines protect the strategists! And how is this different? Although, maybe it's a bit expensive? However, if the submarine that was hit was being repaired underground in Balaklava at the Sevastopol marine plant, would it have been intact? And the gates can be made double-triple, multi-row. It is possible to protect yourself from conventional charges, but from nuclear ones it is probably difficult or expensive.
        1. +1
          30 November 2024 22: 06
          The hole was designed for a nuclear strike. But I seriously doubt that such structures are capable of withstanding the Oreshnik or a precision missile (two, three, five - as many as needed) into the gate. These are the brainchildren of another era, when any weapon had problems with accuracy...
        2. +1
          2 December 2024 10: 22
          Quote: Alexey Lantukh
          Who knows why they refused? Maybe because of the "tomahawks"?

          If I remember correctly, the problem in Balaklava was the same as with the aircraft shelters in the Air Force: the shelter was designed and built without a reserve - and the "Varshavyankas" fit into it about like a T-72 fits into an Il-76. That is, each entry and exit is an acrobatic stunt, a step to the left, a step to the right - and off to repairs.