General and particular in weapons: Kalashnikov assault rifles of "brothers" and "non-brothers"

40
General and particular in weapons: Kalashnikov assault rifles of "brothers" and "non-brothers"
An Afghan Border Police officer with a modernized Hungarian AMD-65 assault rifle (September 2010)


"Esau said, I have plenty, my brother; let what is yours be with you."
Genesis 33:9




stories about weapons. Most people are envious and believe that everything that belongs to others is better than their own. The same often applies to weapons - countries try to adopt the best of what they have. But they don't forget their own either. And here sometimes there are very funny situations: the main rival of the Kalashnikov assault rifle is considered to be the American M16 rifle, but it turns out that the same Belgian FAL was in service with 70 countries, and the M16... only a little more than 20! But in the Guinness Book of Records, the Kalashnikov assault rifle is called the most widespread weapon in the world, since by now there are more than 100 million of them in the world. And all because the Soviet Union not only sold licenses for the production of AK, but also generously supplied it to its allies, friends, and various freedom fighters. And although now the assault rifle is officially produced in only 12 countries, it is almost impossible to count its unlicensed manufacturers, as well as consumers.

But what about our immediate allies in the Warsaw Pact, signed in 1955, such as Albania, Bulgaria, Hungary, the GDR (1956-1990), Poland, Romania, and Czechoslovakia? And there, modifications of our machine gun with minimal changes were produced by all these countries, except Czechoslovakia.

The Hungarian People's Republic was the first to receive a license to manufacture this weapon, as well as all the technical documentation and equipment, in 1955. Moreover, its AK-55 was an exact copy of the Soviet assault rifle. But the Hungarians still decided to add something of their own: they installed a compensator on the barrel, which improved the accuracy of automatic fire, and an additional pistol grip under the fore-end. Moreover, they did not make a new one, but simply took the one that was on the assault rifle itself, but attached it backwards!

As a result, the Hungarians produced a very good machine gun, which Yemen, Afghanistan and a number of other third world countries began to buy from them. In 1999, Hungary joined the NATO bloc, whose standard machine gun cartridge is 5,56 × 45 mm, and committed to switching to NATO standards, but the 7,62 mm Kalashnikov assault rifles still remained the main type of small arms in the Hungarian army.


Liberian soldier with a Romanian MD 63 assault rifle

After Hungary, the Kalashnikov assault rifle was produced in the GDR, Bulgaria, Poland and Romania. Surprisingly, each country made its own, albeit unimportant, changes to it that did not affect the design of the weapon itself. So to speak, to emphasize its national "I", although there was no particular sense in this from a technical point of view. Czechoslovakia stood apart. It had its own weapons school, the Czechs did not want to lose it, and our military and politicians did not put pressure on them, clearly respecting "national feelings". So the Czechs refused to accept the AK-47 into service and developed their own vz. 58 assault rifle instead. Moreover, it was very similar in appearance to the "Kalashnikov", but had a completely different design. True, all small arms of the Warsaw Pact countries were standardized for the Soviet 7,62 X 39 cartridge.


Afghan policeman with a vz. 58 assault rifle (January 2010)

Work on the project called "Broom" began in 1956. The head of the project was Jiří Čermák from Brno, an engineer at the design bureau of the state arms factory "Česká Zbrojovka" in Uherský Brod. Things were going well, so that already in 1958 the assault rifle called vz. 58 was accepted into service and began to be delivered to the troops, replacing the self-loading rifle model 1952 (vz. 52) and the submachine guns Sa 24 and Sa 26.

Over 25 years, more than 920 thousand of these machines were produced, which also entered service not only in the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic, but also in Cuba and a number of countries in Asia and Africa.


Czechoslovakian machine gun model 1958 with a set of accessories

The "58" automatic system allows both single and continuous fire, and, like the AK, is based on the removal of powder gases from the barrel bore through a hole drilled in it. But it works due to the short stroke of the gas piston, which delivers one short impulsive blow to the bolt carrier. In this case, the piston moves back only 19 mm, after which its own return spring returns it to its previous position.

The bolt carrier moves back after the piston strikes it. After moving 22 mm, the wedge-shaped surface of the bolt carrier is under the locking element and lifts it up, disengaging it. This movement allows the empty cartridge case to be ejected using the ejector, which is fixed between the grooves in the lower part of the bolt.

The weapon is fed from 30-round box magazines made of aluminum to reduce weight. After the last shot, the bolt will remain open until a new magazine is inserted. The magazine release is located on the left at the base of the receiver. The ejector is at the base of the magazine well. 10-round clips (similar to those used in the SKS) are also available. However, the Czech machine gun's magazines are not compatible with the AK family of machine guns.

This machine also has an interesting feature in the form of a quick change of the buttstock. At the same time, there is a regular wooden and folding metal buttstock, as well as AR-15 style butts for installation. To select any buttstock option, it is enough to pull the bolt out of the receiver and then change the buttstock.


Automatic rifle vz. 58. Left view


The same machine gun. View from the right


Modernized model vz. 58V (new forend with sighting bar installed)


Sample vz. 58 with "openwork butt"

The machine gun is distinguished by its high quality of manufacture. The receiver is milled. The bolt cover is made of sheet steel. The bolt, gas piston and barrel bore are chrome-plated, and the outer surfaces of all parts are phosphated, and also coated with a special varnish for protection against corrosion. The buttstock, pistol grip and fore-end are made of wood (early models) or plastic filled with wood shavings (late models). A bayonet-knife can be attached to the machine gun, as well as (for some models) bipods and an under-barrel grenade launcher. That is, the Czechs got a weapon that is not much inferior to the AK, but somewhat lighter (2,9 kg compared to the Soviet machine gun, which weighed 3,15 kg), although the use of aluminum in the magazines is a rather controversial decision. In any case, the "58" turned out to be the only "national machine gun" for all the armies of the Warsaw Pact countries! A total of about 920 Cermak machine guns were produced. They were supplied to the Czech Republic and Slovakia (after the collapse of Czechoslovakia), as well as Libya, Cyprus, Angola, Ethiopia, Guinea, Mozambique, Somalia, Tanzania, India, Iraq, Cuba and Guatemala.


The Czech (top) and Soviet (bottom) machine guns were very similar in appearance!


Czech Armed Forces reservists with vz. 58 assault rifles (August 2008)

The Chinese were also among the first to master the production of the Kalashnikov assault rifle and immediately began to make their own changes to it. Their model was called "Type 56". At the same time, the main "trademark" of the Chinese assault rifle was... a needle bayonet, which folded under the barrel in the marching position. The quality of Chinese assault rifles was low.


A Chinese Type 56 assault rifle. Photo by the U.S. Department of Justice.

In 1963, Romania received a license to produce its own AK from the USSR. This time, it all started not with the very first model, but with the AKM, which in the Romanian version was called PM md 63. It is quite easy to distinguish this weapon from many other models by the forward-curved grip for holding, made in one piece with a wooden fore-end; everything else in the weapon is completely analogous to the Soviet version of the machine gun, down to the smallest details. The length of the weapon is 870 millimeters, the barrel length is 415 millimeters. The weight of the machine gun without ammunition is 3,7 kilograms, the rate of fire is 600 rounds per minute. It is very easy to distinguish the Romanian copy from the real Russian machine gun - on the third day of its use, the Romanian clone simply fell apart.

After China, Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania, AK production was established in the GDR, Poland, North Korea and Yugoslavia with a minimum time gap. In addition, screwdriver assembly was carried out from Soviet components in Egypt, Syria, Libya, Cuba, Lebanon and India. In Finland, it turned into the Valmet Rk 60/62. Being an exact copy of the Kalashnikov assault rifle in terms of all mechanisms, it was quite noticeably different from the AK in appearance. The Finnish version of the AK is considered the highest quality of all clones of the Kalashnikov assault rifle produced worldwide.

In the 60s, when the Arab-Israeli wars were going on, the Israeli army's small arms were the Belgian FAL automatic rifle. It was not entirely satisfactory, since it was too sensitive to sand dust. In this regard, a competition was announced to create an assault rifle for the Israeli army. The winner was a modification of the Finnish Valmet Rk 60.


Djibouti. National Police training with the Galil rifle

It was called "Galil" and was, according to experts, a successful version of the machine gun on the AK platform. Then the Finns sold the Israelis some of the equipment and technical documentation for their model, after which the new rifle was used by the Israelis until the end of the 80s. True, it was then replaced by the American M16 automatic rifle, which weighed one and a half kilograms lighter than the Finnish-Israeli modification of the AK-47. However, after that, Israeli soldiers began to often encounter a problem when the "American", having been in sand or water, often let them down. By the way, the machine gun based on the "Galil" also ended up in South Africa, so our "Kalashnikov" and its clones have been in many countries and were not in service...


A Georgian army unit with Galil rifles in Afghanistan, June 2013.

Here is an interesting metamorphosis that happened to the Kalashnikov assault rifle in East Germany. The first assault rifles that were produced by the GDR industry were almost completely identical to the Soviet original. But with some differences. The main one was the absence of a cleaning rod. However, this did not mean that the GDR army did not clean weapons. The cleaning rod was simply carried by the serviceman in a pouch and was flexible.

In 1985, they also became concerned about creating a machine gun for the NATO 5,56 x 45 mm cartridge. They remembered this not because life was good: East Germany simply needed currency, especially since the example of neighboring socialist countries (the Poles, for example, sold their AKMs to Nicaragua for $89 each) was very inspiring. So the Ministry of Foreign Trade and the Ministry of State Security (Stasi) decided to start selling such a machine gun, wanting to receive at least 200 of them per year.

It was supposed to create a whole family of automatic weapons from five models: an assault rifle with a fixed butt, with a folding butt, with a folding butt and a shortened barrel, a light machine gun with a weighted barrel and bipods, and a sniper rifle with an extended barrel, optical sight and bipods. The weapons were based again on the life-tested Kalashnikov assault rifle.


Automatic rifle "Viger 941". Military-historical Bundeswehr Museum in Dresden

"During military tests in Peru and India, the new machine gun, designated the "Viger 941", left the assault rifles from the USA and West Germany far behind in accuracy,"

— it was reported following these tests. Reliability was on the same level as that of Kalashnikov assault rifles. Production began in 1989, and the first foreign contracts arrived at the same time — Peru, having tested these assault rifles, decided to order them for its police, and a little later the Indians joined the Peruvians. But due to the withdrawal of the GDR from the Warsaw Pact, and then the unification with West Germany in 1990, production of these assault rifles was stopped, and the contracts were cancelled by the FRG government (with the payment of fines). This is where the history of the "Viger 941" ended, although the history of the Kalashnikov assault rifles themselves continues today, and sometimes it makes very whimsical zigzags. In particular, we are talking about the passion of many gunsmiths not so much for alterations, but for gilding and silvering of weapons. It happens that our AK is also covered with 10-karat gold, turning the weapon into a souvenir worth 10 thousand dollars or more! At one time, none other than Saddam Hussein gilded his personal AK, becoming the Middle Eastern trendsetter for "golden machine guns". That's where it all started!
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    30 November 2024 05: 21
    ...Well, yes!.. THERE WERE... THERE WERE TIMES!...
  2. 0
    30 November 2024 09: 09
    Equal sign between vz. 58 and AKM?
    The first one has a short piston stroke, a skewed bolt, and a bolt catch, like Kim fn FAL.
    Will the comparison between AKM and Sturmgewehr continue?
    And finally about Schmeisser)
    1. IVZ
      +2
      30 November 2024 09: 43
      Equal sign between vz. 58 and AKM?
      The first one has a short piston stroke, a skewed bolt, and a bolt catch, like the Kim fn FAL.
      Will there be a comparison between the AKM and the Sturmgewehr? And finally about the Schmeisser
      The short stroke of the gas piston, the slide stop - are not significant differences. But the locking - yes. By the way, there is no skew of the slide, but a swinging latch based on the Walter P-38 model produced in Czech factories during World War II. Well, or like the Beretta 2. The first prototypes of the AK, having a completely different design, a detachable receiver, really resembled the MP-92. What was Schmeisser's participation in? It seems to me in the introduction of the technology for the production of stamped and welded parts, but this is only a guess.
  3. 0
    30 November 2024 09: 47
    One of the main advantages of domestic AKs is the production of barrels using the radial forging method. With subsequent electrochemical processing of the channel and obtaining rifling. The technology was tested on the AKM. In principle, it is known to everyone, but only a few manufacturers around the world were able to test and apply it. And, of course, the quality of the metal
    1. +2
      30 November 2024 12: 41
      Probably rotational forging after all hi And the grooves there are formed by the mandrel, in the process, then honing, etc. The machines in the USSR were Austrian Steer, then GFM, now probably some Asian ones. And the steel there is ordinary structural quality, supplied according to mechanical properties and chemical composition, special weapons steels were cancelled in the 60s.
      1. +2
        30 November 2024 13: 09
        Rotary forging is a type of radial forging. Try pushing a mandrel through forged metal. Have you seen bows made of long pushers? So only electrochemistry, especially since it has been worked out reliably. And a mandrel, a trellis - after a drill and reamers,
      2. +2
        30 November 2024 13: 12
        At one time, rifling was forged through the master model, but it was too difficult. Electrochemistry.
      3. +1
        30 November 2024 13: 46
        On steel. Metallurgists are bores - they melt, refine, alloy, roll, write and comply with specifications as thick as War and Peace. It turns out everything is simple, take steel, make a barrel.
        Steel 35, St3, 65g, 40KhSA, 38KhMYuA, 30KhMYuA, 30Kh2N2VMFA - where is barrel steel here, at least in the first approximation? These are all structural steels. Melting, forging, heat treatment?
        1. IVZ
          +1
          30 November 2024 14: 12
          On steel. Metallurgists are bores - they melt, refine, alloy, roll, write and comply with specifications as thick as War and Peace.
          Everything is correct. Only all this should be studied, and not fantasized inventing your own technological processes. Why write about what you do not know? Electrochemistry and mandrel-burnishing are not needed during reduction. Rifling, and sometimes the chamber, are obtained directly in the forging process by pressing the metal around the mandrel.
          1. 0
            30 November 2024 20: 04
            Why do you still write about things you don’t know?
            After forging, the metal structure is so dense that mandrel boring requires incomparably greater axial forces. Have you seen a mandrel pusher made of tool steel that curls into a terrible butterfly when the mandrel stops in the channel being processed? And this is when processing a not very complex caliber 7.62. I've seen enough.
            Forging around not a MASTER MODEL, but a MASTER MODEL with the formation of rifling and especially a chamber has long been abandoned. It is simpler and more technologically advanced to do it after forging using electrochemistry, and this is where we have stopped at the present time. The resource of rifling after electrochemistry differs slightly from that of mandrel rifling with a cardinal gain in technological efficiency
            1. IVZ
              0
              30 November 2024 21: 10
              Why do you still write about things you don’t know?
              Dear Sir, I am explaining to you that the rifling in the barrel is formed directly during the barrel reduction process or, in other words, the rotary forging of its blank. The process does not require any mandrelling, and most often no other operations, including finishing, except for normalization and, sometimes, cryogenic treatment of the blank. I have been doing this for 40 years.
            2. IVZ
              0
              30 November 2024 21: 24
              P.S. Electrochemistry has been used for a long time, it did not ensure manufacturing accuracy. But mandrel boring is used now to make barrels for precision. For example, at Lobaev. I can personally attest. But forging is not used there. And it is not about the rigidity of the material, but about residual stresses that are very difficult to remove and which change the geometry of the barrel during its external processing or heating. Barrels for mass-produced weapons are made all over the world by the reduction method, and our partners also drive precision in this way. Perhaps we simply do not have the appropriate class of equipment.
              1. +2
                30 November 2024 21: 51
                So read my comments more carefully. It says there that mandrel boring is used after drilling and reaming the barrel. The structure is then appropriate. And you can push the mandrel without mass flow without any fuss. Lobaev's tolerances are not AK, are they? Especially geometric ones.
                Electrochemical, among other things, carries less internal stress, which you will be tormented to remove, either with cryogen, or vibration, or tempering with annealing.
                Rigidity has nothing to do with it.
                The structure, hardness and roughness of the surface being mandrelized are important. The heat treatment specialists will give you a workpiece at the upper limit, and the mandrelization will be affected immediately.
        2. 0
          30 November 2024 23: 01
          Semenov197 I don't get it. Is the barrel made of St3? Or is it irony? I've cleaned the canal so many times, no, it's different. Sov rusts differently, if that matters. Is he really right? hhurik, that "special weapons steels were abolished in the 60s"?
          1. +1
            30 November 2024 23: 23
            No, what are you saying. St3 steel is ordinary steel, not even of high quality. My interlocutor simply claimed that structural steels are suitable for the barrel without any special requirements for them.
            In response, I gave a number of steel grades related to structural steels and suggested choosing the one closest to the barrel grade. No answer yet
            1. +1
              30 November 2024 23: 41
              That's exactly what I thought. Steel, to put it mildly, is not suitable for all kinds. wink
              1. +1
                30 November 2024 23: 45
                Definitely, and starting from the workpiece, to the finishing operations, several flaw detection operations are carried out with merciless rejection
          2. +1
            30 November 2024 23: 37
            And so, for the barrel, not special, but structural steel with a carbon content of no more than 0.4, moderate or high content of alloying elements is used. Improved or normalized. (Improvement - hardening and high tempering, normalization - heating to the hardening temperature with cooling and transformation of the hardening structure in the air) electroslag remelting, increased requirements for the content of harmful impurities.
            30ХМЮА, 30Х2Н2ВМФА, for example.
            1. +1
              30 November 2024 23: 52
              Well, that's always impressive! Please help me decipher: 30Х2Н2ВМФА - is it 0.3 carbon, 2% chromium, 2% nickel, vanadium, manganese, phosphorus, aluminum?
              1. 0
                30 November 2024 23: 56
                Everything is correct, only F is vanadium (phosphorus is a harmful impurity) letter A is for high-quality steel
                1. 0
                  30 November 2024 23: 58
                  Thank you! And then what is the letter B for?
                  1. 0
                    30 November 2024 23: 59
                    In the designation B is tungsten.
                    1. +1
                      1 December 2024 00: 01
                      Well, of course, tungsten. wink It was very interesting! You should write an article...!
                      1. +1
                        1 December 2024 00: 02
                        Stankow, thank you, I always appreciate your comments.
      4. +2
        30 November 2024 13: 53
        Can you imagine a hone for a 5-7-8mm hole? How to insert it? And operate it?
        Surface charging - have you heard of this?
        And they started making AKM barrels from the Steyr RKMs.
        1. +3
          30 November 2024 14: 07
          What a blast you are! good I am far from technical progress, so I can’t rustle terminology. However, after the chrome peeled off on my brand new Bars 4-1 after 800 shots to an indecent state of the barrel, I became interested. Here I even found it on a specialized forum, for general development. https://forum.guns.ru/forummessage/291/996796.html
          And yes: after using various bullets, I only buy foreign cars. So that I don't feel excruciatingly sorry for the money I spent aimlessly. hi
          1. +2
            30 November 2024 14: 22
            Bars is nothing
            When chrome flies out of the PCT on the pre-wet after the first turn, it's an interesting sight. Accepted completely. Anything can happen
          2. +2
            30 November 2024 14: 47
            What reduction? Will you measure 5 chamber cones after forging? With what tolerances after forging???? Do you distinguish machining from forging production? Buy a foreign car, and don't fantasize about making a domestic one
  4. +3
    30 November 2024 11: 45
    Quote: Zufei
    Equal sign between vz. 58 and AKM?

    Where? "But it works due to the short stroke of the gas piston, which delivers one short impulsive blow to the bolt carrier. In this case, the piston moves back only 19 mm, after which its own return spring returns it to its previous position.

    The bolt carrier moves back after the piston strikes it. After moving 22 mm, the wedge-shaped surface of the bolt carrier is under the locking element and lifts it up, disengaging it. This movement allows the empty cartridge case to be ejected using the extractor, which is fixed between the grooves in the lower part of the bolt."
  5. +2
    30 November 2024 15: 55
    To be honest, I always liked Vyacheslav's articles before, maybe because I didn't understand much about the topics he touched on, but it turned out that this article was a turn-off for me. There was a feeling that some schoolboy wrote it, even the humor is appropriate in the spirit of "the Hungarians took and put a handle in the front, turning it around" ... The thing is that 10-12 years ago I was very interested in the topic of various AK clones, I could practically determine the country of manufacture by the location of the rivets and their shape (well, if it is a factory AK, of course, and not assembled by artisans). So, a little (well, how a little, I would say very much) I will add - before the release of the legendary AKM, AK (officially the machine gun was called "Kalashnikov assault rifle", and not AK-47 as is commonly believed, because it was even accepted into service in 49) had as many as 4 generations, TYPE 1, TYPE 2, TYPE 3 and TYPE 4, which even had non-interchangeable parts ... and the USSR sold / distributed licenses specifically for AK TYPE 3 (manufactured by milling, not stamping), not AKM. If we take Hungary specifically, then production began in 1955 and the machine gun was a copy of the AK type 3 until 1963, when the Amd.63, manufactured by stamping, went into production. Moreover, the forend was metal, and there was a handle, but not at all "turned the other way"....
    1. 0
      30 November 2024 16: 52
      Quote: parma
      well, there was a handle, but it was not at all "turned in the other direction"...

      I'm too lazy to look for a photo, but there is exactly this one on the Internet...
      "It was officially called simply AK, or "Kalashnikov assault rifle model 1949". The AK-47 designation was given to the 1947 prototype and the installation series assault rifles undergoing military testing. The "Brief Guide" in which this designation appears was published before the assault rifle was accepted into service (i.e. when it did not yet have an official designation)."
      1. +1
        1 December 2024 00: 52
        Vyacheslav, good evening! Don't take this as a personal complaint, but for an article about the AK and its copies/analogues in different countries, it's really weak... and if I'm not very familiar with the stories of the conquistadors, then I am familiar with the history of AK clones... and if the handle really was "turned the other way", then in general the machine gun was a little more interesting (give me a discount, I didn't write the article with all the originals, but from memory)
  6. 0
    30 November 2024 19: 53
    I came across a statement that the FN FAL was diligently copied from the SVT, I would like to know if it is true or not??? I did not come across any comparisons/studies, I would read it with pleasure.. A PLUS to the author for the work done...
    1. +1
      30 November 2024 20: 24
      The FN FAL, with its not entirely transparent German-Spanish origins, has a vertical wedge locking unit that is indeed very similar to the SVT. In those years, Svet was popular for borrowing technical solutions. But this is common practice in the arms industry
  7. 0
    1 December 2024 07: 48
    Quote: Semenov197
    The FN FAL, with its not entirely transparent German-Spanish origins, has a vertical wedge locking system that is indeed very similar to the SVT.

    You seem to be confusing the "hand of peace" with the origin of the German G3 from the Spanish CETME.
    FAL is the original D.Sev.
    1. 0
      1 December 2024 09: 05
      The very first, original version of the FAL was made for the Mauser 7.92. And this was at the end of the war with a completely clear winner.
      1. -1
        1 December 2024 13: 41
        Quote: Semenov197
        The very first, original version of the FAL was made for the Mauser 7.92. And this was at the end of the war with a completely clear winner.

        The British fought the ENTIRE war with a Czech tank machine gun using the Mauser cartridge!
  8. 0
    1 December 2024 09: 13
    Quote: Semenov197
    The very first, original version of the FAL was made for the Mauser 7.92. And this was at the end of the war with a completely clear winner.


    At first it was designed with 7.92x33.
    Then prototypes with the British .280
    The series went into production with the 7.62x51 cartridge.
    And the Mauser 7.92x57 is a rifle cartridge.
    1. 0
      1 December 2024 10: 04
      I won't argue with you, I read a long time ago, on paper, that the history of the FAL began in the depths of the Mauser and under a rifle cartridge. That's why I formulated the appearance of this rifle as not entirely transparent
      1. +1
        1 December 2024 13: 42
        Quote: Semenov197
        FAL history

        I'll try to write about this rifle soon. I'll get to the Royal Armouries and then...