Pentagon reports successful testing of AI-controlled machine gun

45
Pentagon reports successful testing of AI-controlled machine gun
Bullfrog does not require a radar and can detect and engage targets on its own. It is a standard machine gun, supplemented with robotics


With the start of the CBO, the world's armed forces are now preoccupied with one question: how to counter the threat of attacks drones? The US military now wants to solve the problem in a particularly cost-effective way: a standard machine gun could be controlled remotely using robotics.



Weapon, called Bullfrog, is being developed by Allen Control Systems and is essentially little more than the M240 machine gun that has been in use by the U.S. military for half a century. The weapon is combined with new sensors designed to detect threats and artificial intelligence that has not been described in detail. According to initial tests, the system should be able to effectively combat incoming drones.

Cheap Ammo


The Bullfrog's biggest advantage: the 7,62mm bullets are NATO-standard, available in large quantities and, above all, cheap. One shot costs less than a dollar. The cost factor has been the biggest problem in drone defense so far: even cheap converted civilian drones pose a huge threat. The attacker always has an economic advantage, since he can control masses of drones for a few hundred dollars per unit, while defense is becoming more and more expensive.

But Bullfrog isn't just supposed to shoot a cloud of lead into the sky at high speed. The system is said to be able to destroy incoming drones with just a few shots. This, in turn, increases survivability, since reloading the weapon is still done by soldiers on the ground, who are virtually defenseless during this activity.

During a series of T-Rex technology readiness tests organized by the U.S. Department of Defense, Bullfrog passed initial tests. According to Wired, the Pentagon was impressed with these tests, The Defense Post reports.


Allen Control Systems - Bullfrog Autonomous Battle Station

Drones are difficult to shoot down because they are small, maneuverable, and hard to hit. The U.S. military has already tested various ways to use conventional firearms more effectively against drones, from developing new types of ammunition to using jammers to disrupt their signals.

But Bullfrog is taking a different approach: instead of relying on human shooters or modified weapons, the company is relying on artificial intelligence and robotics. Dramatic footage from the Ukraine conflict has shown that effective drone defense is crucial, with soldiers on both sides resorting to desperate measures and opening fire with their assault rifles on incoming suicide drones (FPVs). That’s unlikely to work, according to the company’s founder and former naval engineer Steve Simonyi.

The Bullfrog is capable of intercepting approaching drones at a range of up to 180 meters. On average, it takes no more than two shots to intercept a fist-sized drone, such as the DJI Mini. In addition, the modified machine gun, including control electronics, is significantly lighter (181 kilograms) than the previously used Phalanx short-range defense system, i.e. a rapid-fire cannon. However, the weight requires that the Bullfrog be mounted on a vehicle. In addition, no radar is required; the system can independently detect and engage targets.

The first fully autonomous weapon


If the military adopts the system, Bullfrog would be the first known autonomous lethal weapon in the Pentagon’s arsenal. While the final command to fire would still have to come from a human operator, the manufacturer has made it clear that a fully autonomous version could also be an option if the military so chooses. However, the US military stresses that it is committed to the so-called “human in the know” principle. This means that ultimately it is up to the human to decide whether to use lethal force.

Still, the Pentagon is investing heavily in counter-drone technology through its Replicator initiative as the threat from increasingly sophisticated and affordable drones continues to grow. American officers stationed in the Middle East have raised alarm bells about the ease with which civilian drones could be weaponized. Earlier this year, three American soldiers were killed in a drone attack on a base in Jordan.

U.S. Africa Command (Africom) outlined in a procurement document why access to OpenaAI’s AI technology is “essential” to its missions. Specifically, the command emphasizes the use of advanced AI and machine learning applications.

There is no place for people


The Replicator program also aims to mass-produce such defensive weapons, as many current anti-drone defenses are either ineffective or too expensive. Energy weapons that shoot drones out of the sky with lasers or microwaves are considered possible alternatives, but all are still in the experimental stage. Of course, modifying a machine gun like the M240 offers huge advantages: the gun is available in the thousands, and soldiers are trained to use it.

But the manufacturer is already thinking ahead: the next step will be to further increase the range and accuracy. At the end of the development, several Bullfrogs will team up with each other and open fire on drones in a coordinated manner, thereby fully automatically protecting entire military convoys.

In any case, Simoni is confident that robots will soon take over control of military operations and people will no longer have to put their lives in danger.

"The battlefield of the future will consist of autonomous robots like ours shooting at each other,"

— says Simoni.

"I think there is no place for people with guns anymore."
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    20 November 2024 05: 53
    A long-time dream of "combat" science fiction writers: an autonomous shooting device. From an ethical point of view, how is it worse than a mine on a combat platoon? True, if you need to get close to the mine, such a thing can control up to 1 km around. Horror.
    1. 0
      20 November 2024 07: 50
      What's so scary? For example, such a system was installed on the Shilka 60 years ago. Pantsir-S is capable of firing at targets in automatic mode, and several machines create a system, choose targets themselves, and determine the most dangerous ones. Installing such a system on the ground is generally simple, here the targets are low-speed, there are infrared sensors, radar and optics, and no infection will get through. This is not science fiction, but yesterday.
      1. 0
        20 November 2024 08: 57
        As a fully autonomous device - not yet.
      2. AAK
        +1
        20 November 2024 12: 15
        The key words in your post, dear Victor, are "...60 years ago..." and "this is...yesterday", nothing was developed for the Russian army to destroy drones, especially FPV. True, the ZSU-23x4 radar was not designed to detect and automatically track such small targets, and, if I remember correctly, somewhere in the late 80s - early 90s, the Foreign Military Review published an article about the development of mini-ZUs for tanks (2 12.7mm machine guns + mm-range radar on a rotating platform) to combat promising ATGMs. Since most of the drones used now are copters, it is better to use UV sensors instead of an IR channel, they respond better to rotating blades, even small ones. Well, the problem of AI in the target detection and tracking system comes into full swing, and here we run into our "world's largest" microcircuits...
    2. 0
      20 November 2024 17: 49
      True, if you need to get closer to the mine

      I wouldn't be surprised if mines that approach on their own will soon appear. For example, pyropatrons located along the perimeter of the anti-personnel system will be able to fire it in the direction of a soldier when the step sensor is triggered and fill him with shrapnel...
  2. +1
    20 November 2024 06: 29
    Excellent, simple, long overdue solution.
    It is stupid to learn only from the wars of the 20th or 19th centuries. Progress, alas, is here too.
    Over the past 25 years, too many unrealized technical possibilities for wars have accumulated.
    The example of drones is just a small illustration. And we need to understand what an illustration is.
    An illustration of the use of non-specialized civilian technologies by less developed countries. Primitive drones with primitive electronics, many of them civilian.
    Alas, specialized developments will follow... And what can be done with modern technologies in the military field is scary to think about...
  3. -1
    20 November 2024 06: 54
    The author writes "lead cloud" or the translation is incorrect, or hunting cartridges! With two shots? Very doubtful. Advertising (lies in Russian) is the engine of foisting off. But the main problem is not this. Such systems are good only for organizing perimeter protection from natives, in occupied territory. Well, actually, Israel has had such systems on the border for 15 years already.
    1. +1
      20 November 2024 11: 10
      Quote: Leomobil
      The author writes "lead cloud" or the translation is incorrect, or hunting cartridges!

      This is an artistic exaggeration. In fact, we are talking about the fact that the Bullfrog works precisely on the target. And not like a shotgun or a ZAK, sowing the approximate area of ​​the target with striking elements in the hope of hitting according to statistics.
      But Bullfrog isn't just supposed to shoot a cloud of lead into the sky at high speed.
      1. 0
        20 November 2024 14: 15
        Quote: Alexey RA
        This is an artistic exaggeration. In fact, we are talking about the fact that Bullfrog works precisely on the target.

        This is what this is about. hi
  4. 0
    20 November 2024 07: 39
    quite an obvious and long overdue solution. sooner or later the whole fight against drones will come to this. why don't ours think of it, after 3 years of war, suffering most of the losses because of those drones?..
    1. 0
      20 November 2024 15: 49
      Quote: squid
      Why can't our guys figure this out, after 3 years of war, suffering most of their losses because of those drones?

      Who wouldn't think of it? There are some in the Ministry of Defense who think that thinking is harmful, and it seems that cases have finally been opened against some of them.
  5. +1
    20 November 2024 07: 46
    Well, what the hell is AI? There is none and there won't be any for a long time. A regular program that takes into account various conditions, plus evaluates the miss and makes adjustments. A good system for non-maneuvering low-speed targets, but when maneuvering, that's it, it will freeze completely, since there is no intuition, no ability to hit on a whim.
    1. -7
      20 November 2024 09: 25
      The AI ​​that you so utterly deny has existed for a long time and has been successfully used, although, perhaps, from the height of your intellect, it is, if you like, an “ordinary program”.
      The problem with active target maneuvering is solved by a ballistic computer, and not recently, but a very long time ago. The problem is only in the hardware capacity of the processor.
      1. +2
        20 November 2024 12: 42
        For some reason, ballistic computers don't work when it's necessary to shoot down a ballistic missile actively maneuvering in the final section. And that's where you need the kind of computers you need.
        1. 0
          21 November 2024 07: 22
          This means that the required parameters have not yet been achieved technologically. Let's wait.
  6. -1
    20 November 2024 08: 01
    I still remember an old incident when in the USA at a presentation an autonomous robot with AI elements suddenly turned towards the audience and discharged a belt of 200 rounds. 90 or 97 souls at once and a bunch of wounded. In general, it showed an excellent result. So here everything is not so clear
    1. 0
      20 November 2024 17: 06
      If it's not too much trouble, please provide a link. I have never read (seen) about a similar incident anywhere.
      1. 0
        20 November 2024 21: 37
        What other link? I have no idea how it's done. It was at least 10 years ago. There aren't many details, everything was going well, they handed over control to the AI, the robot went to the position, but then it turned around and off it went. I think the site was called "InoSMI"; there were translations of foreign articles.
      2. +1
        20 November 2024 22: 26
        What problems? This is the movie "Robocop" Download and watch
        1. 0
          21 November 2024 02: 19
          Probably Robocop 2, in the first one only one boss and two lab assistants were killed during testing. And it wasn't the AI ​​that shot at the crowd, but a robot with a drug addict's brain. Who would have thought!
  7. 0
    20 November 2024 08: 22
    You can't connect a typewriter to a computer, you won't get a printer. tongue A regular light machine gun won't work as an autonomous anti-aircraft device. Only another amateur can believe it. A special shooting module is needed, automated, and there a chip from a washing machine is more suitable than any AI.
  8. 0
    20 November 2024 08: 51
    Quote: Leomobil
    With two shots? Very doubtful.

    Why not? The distance is no more than 180 meters, and if the target is at 100 meters, then hitting the bull's eye is quite possible with the first shot.
    This is not a question of the machine gun, but of the sighting system settings. The platform itself is very stable, a couple of hundred kilograms. For a single shot, it's like being embedded in concrete.
    1. +2
      20 November 2024 09: 56
      For moving targets, the size of an A4 sheet, the speed is at least 20 m/s, the time of arrival at 200 m. - 0.2 sec. That is, the UAV will go 3-4 meters. In three coordinates. And the ball. calculator should work it out. But that's not all, the strike zone should be closed 2 by 2 meters, with saturation of 400 striking elements. Let the rate of fire be 900 v/m. That means 15 per second, it is necessary No. 10 machine guns good
      1. +2
        20 November 2024 14: 02
        I saw a video somewhere (maybe even here), where the Americans are practicing an automatic grenade launcher system, anti-drone, of course. A burst of three shots with a programmable detonation. One shot with some lead, one at the conditional calculation center, and one a little behind, in case of miscalculations in aiming. A sea of ​​fragments, there is a small high-explosive effect, enough for a drone.
        This is the system I like.
      2. 0
        21 November 2024 02: 21
        speed minimum 20 m/s, arrival time at 200 m. - 0.2 sec
        Didn't you go to school? It should be 10 seconds
        1. 0
          21 November 2024 06: 45
          The arrival of a bullet, of course, not a drone )). Let me explain! If the speed of the bullet is 900 m.s. then 200 m. It will fly in 0.2+- seconds, if you can't get it in a column, try it on the brushes ))))
          1. 0
            21 November 2024 12: 16
            And the drone circles and maneuvers wildly without losing the target? Maybe a fighter can dodge a machine gun 400 meters away?
  9. -3
    20 November 2024 10: 11
    Thing! good This solution is more reliable than any electronic warfare. And you don't have to literally fire cannons at "sparrows". And you can easily install it on a tank. And on an infantry fighting vehicle. And fiber optics in conjunction with a drone are beside the point.
  10. 0
    20 November 2024 10: 35
    Only another amateur can believe this.

    Another amateur won't believe it laughing
    1. 0
      20 November 2024 18: 28
      Well wrong feel but your comment is actually a flood! Off-topic broadcast mister moderator laughing
      1. +1
        20 November 2024 23: 21
        Quote: Leomobil
        Off topic broadcast mister moderator

        Where is the moderator here?
  11. 0
    20 November 2024 11: 57
    because many current anti-drone measures are either ineffective or too expensive.

    Saving on programmable shells, which results in the loss of a tank worth 5-10 million dollars.
    Or the payment for the death of a serviceman is 100-150 thousand $.
    If you estimate, even one set of a good commercial SIBZ now comes to 150-200 thousand rubles.
  12. 0
    20 November 2024 12: 30
    The setup looks good, but 7,62 is not an option against drones.
    Drone drivers will start maneuvering and no AI will be able to cope.
    Shotguns with a cloud of pellets 2 meters in diameter at a distance of up to 100 m are much better.
  13. 0
    20 November 2024 16: 49
    And they really did it. A stand, cameras, drives... I would make a robot machine gun with an additional body kit of no more than 10 kg.
  14. +1
    20 November 2024 20: 26
    The Pentagon has announced the successful testing of an AI-controlled machine gun....
    The Pentagon announces a lot, but more often than not, it does nothing but PR. We have seen this more than once.
    In this case, we are talking about a wonder weapon against a weakly maneuvering target - i.e. flying along a straight trajectory without a lateral maneuver. A simple calculation shows that with a lateral maneuver with an acceleration of 1 g, which all FPV drones without exception are capable of, to hit at a distance of 200 m, you need to simultaneously penetrate an area of ​​10x40 cm with a step of 40 cm. That is, fire at least 9 bullets in 0,01 sec (this is at least 900 shots per second or 54 shots per minute).
    Well, what does a standard machine gun have to do with it?
    1. 0
      20 November 2024 20: 50
      I completely agree, moreover, with an accuracy of at least 0.5 MOA, and a ball calculator with a half-second response time, a bullet speed of 900 m.s., a rotating two-coordinate platform with a positioning accuracy of 0.2 seconds (minimum). laughing
    2. 0
      20 November 2024 20: 52
      Oh, I forgot, the rate of fire is 1500-2000 rounds per minute, 25-30 rounds per second.
    3. 0
      20 November 2024 20: 59
      40x40 with a step of 10 is 5x5=25, a pair of 1500 will give 40 v.s. should be enough.
      1. 0
        21 November 2024 17: 25
        40x40 with a step of 10 is 3x3, what's the point of hitting the corners? And all the bullets need to arrive at the same time (well, at least not worse than 1/10 of the flight time, otherwise they will stretch out in a line and the hit is not guaranteed - the target will move beyond the square).
        40 v.s is less than 1 shot (0,8) in a given time. Not even close.
  15. 0
    20 November 2024 22: 19
    If they announce the sector of probable target detection, the flight speed of the target drone and its rectilinear movement, the picture will not be so rosy.
    This installation itself will become another beautiful target for a couple of drones flying from two opposite sides.
  16. 0
    20 November 2024 22: 33
    If the declared AI is developed, then shooters can be sent to the dustbin of military history. It will be enough to enter new target images into the recognition system. We replace the machine gun with a grenade launcher, mortar, cannon or howitzer, and a gunner follows the shooter. Then any non-nuclear war will be won by the one who masters the mass production of more accurate and fast automatic guidance systems.
  17. +2
    21 November 2024 03: 26
    I think it's disinformation. Like SDI.
    .
    But our generals will again puzzle the designers with an impossible task: to be like the Americans. As a result, real equipment will not be created. But everything is so simple...
    1. 0
      21 November 2024 06: 54
      Everything is doable, but if they make a "koloshmat" for 70 years, they (our gun designers) will only make the AKM. )))
      1. 0
        3 December 2024 12: 30
        The beginnings of AI are needed to identify targets against the background of the earth, to identify an attacking UAV against the background of the sky, and at short distances of 50-200 m, this is orders of magnitude easier. It is not the first year that they have been writing here about the possibility of fighting drones at short distances using automated, although it is more correct to call them autonomous, small-caliber ZU, for example, 5.45
        1. 0
          Yesterday, 11: 03
          AI is needed, but it's not that simple, at a distance of 250 and less, at a speed of 20 m.s. UAV, holding a target with high maneuverability is very difficult, there are only 8 seconds left to make a decision and destroy.