Donald Trump's victory in the presidential election will ensure US dominance in space

80
Donald Trump's victory in the presidential election will ensure US dominance in space


Under the hood


On February 28, 1959, the first artificial Earth satellite (AES), the photo reconnaissance satellite CORONA (Discoverer), was launched in the United States, marking the beginning of a new era of reconnaissance.



From that moment on, at the facilities of the USSR Ministry of Defense, as well as at other facilities where secrecy was required, equally inconspicuous logs began to appear in inconspicuous safes, indicating the type and time of flight of enemy reconnaissance satellites.


The first American photo reconnaissance satellite CORONA (Discoverer)

Accordingly, during the period when the enemy's reconnaissance satellites were above the object, all work on the object was stopped, and the necessary measures were taken to camouflage and disinform the enemy. This practice continues to this day, but since then there have been more and more reconnaissance satellites, and fewer and fewer opportunities to hide from them.

Reconnaissance from space is carried out in the optical wavelength range (visible and thermal), in the radar (RL) wavelength range in aperture synthesis mode (when the radar image has almost photographic quality), and also in the form of electronic reconnaissance satellites (IRS).

The spatial resolution of radar images from commercial low-orbit satellites, such as the Mission Solutions satellite line owned by satellite data provider Umbra, already reaches 16 centimeters; this figure may be even higher for military satellites. The spatial resolution in the visible wavelength range may presumably reach units of centimeters.

On the brink of revolution


In the last few years, the situation has been developing rapidly – ​​the catalysts here are the reduction in the cost of launching a payload (PL) into orbit, as well as the development of technologies for large-scale – conveyor-belt production of artificial satellites. Both the first and the second were provided by Elon Musk’s SpaceX, respectively, in the form of a partially reusable missiles- the Falcon 9 carrier and the satellites of the high-speed low-orbit communications system Starlink.


The Falcon 9 rocket has become the "workhorse" of American space exploration

SpaceX's success has not gone unnoticed, and the company is currently involved in the Pentagon's construction program. Starshield low-orbit satellite networks designed to provide 24/365 reconnaissance and encrypted high-speed communications to the US military, as well as in a number of other projects.

It is possible that satellites from the said Starshield system will also be used to improve the efficiency and interference immunity of the GPS system - a possibility that SpaceX was working on for Starlink satellites back in 2021.


It is worth noting that for a long time, our allies, holding back the development of the SpaceX company, were various American regulators and environmental organizations - they put "spokes in the wheels" of Elon Musk as best they could.

There is an opinion that their activity is connected with the discontent of the mastodons of the American defense-industrial complex (MIC), for example, such as Boeing, which clearly will not be able to compete fairly with SpaceX, given the pace of development and production, as well as the exorbitant cost of the super-heavy launch vehicle (LV) Space Launch System (SLS). Failures also haunt the reusable transport spacecraft Boeing CTS-100 Starliner.


The super-heavy PH Space Launch System and the CTS-100 Starliner spacecraft are obsolete even before they were built

The Presidential Factor


Now, after the victory of Donald Trump, on whom Elon Musk "bet", opponents of SpaceX will most likely get a rap. For example, they say that Boeing is already considering the possibility of selling its space business. By the way, the same SpaceX may well be interested in the purchase, and it will be primarily interested not in Boeing's technologies (although they too), but in its patent base and its contracts with the US Armed Forces.


Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Photo: Brian Snyder/File Photo, Reuters

Thus, Donald Trump's victory in the US presidential election will most likely mean an intensification of the space race, primarily in the format of accelerating the development and testing of a fully reusable super-heavy launch vehicle, including the Starship spacecraft and its first stage Superheavy.


Starship/Superhavy liftoff and successful landing of Superhavy's first stage

If the program is successfully implemented, the cost of launching a payload into orbit will be significantly reduced – the cost of launching one kilogram of cargo on a super-heavy launch vehicle may be cheaper than on any other launch vehicle in stories, which in itself would be something of a miracle.

However, in order for them not to carry “air”, Starships will need to be loaded with something, so they will drag everything possible and impossible into orbit – the space industry is expecting explosive growth.


In order for the flights of hundreds of super-heavy reusable Starship/Super Heavy spacecraft per year to pay for themselves, they need to be provided with a payload. Knowing Elon Musk's character, this means that SpaceX will go to great lengths to complete this task. Work on creating payloads for various purposes will be carried out both by its own efforts and by third-party companies.

It can be assumed that SpaceX will try to stimulate the market as much as possible by offering minimal prices for launching payloads into orbit, perhaps even operating at a loss (at the initial stage) – there are a great many potential areas for doing business.


Starship is not only a huge payload, but also an equally huge internal volume that will need to be filled with something. Pictured is the two-story crew compartment of the SpaceX Starship Human Landing System (HLS) lunar module.

For example, this includes space tourism, including hotels in orbit, with a level of comfort that is currently unthinkable, orbital solar energy with the transmission of energy to Earth via a microwave beam, the extraction of minerals from asteroids and the Moon, growing crystals in space for microchips and hollow organs for transplantation, repair and refueling of satellites and spacecraft, 3D printing in a vacuum, and much more.

Of course, a significant share of the space services market will be orders from the US Department of Defense. Among other things, there will be so many reconnaissance satellites above our heads that any logbooks will lose all meaning – surveillance will be conducted in real time, 24/365.

Orbital reconnaissance assets are potentially capable of detecting and tracking in real time virtually all types of targets – ground, surface and air. Submarines are in question – the use of lidars, as well as ultra-sensitive gravimetric and magnetometric sensors, potentially allows them to be detected from satellites as well.

The combination of real-time reconnaissance and high-speed satellite data transmission networks will not only detect targets, but also provide external target designation with correction of the flight path of guided munitions right up until the moment of target destruction, without the use of any ground sensors or control channels.

Conclusions


Today the winner is the one who has dominance in the air, tomorrow the winner will be the one who has dominance in space., and all the rest will be practically doomed to failure.

At the moment when Donald Trump won, the shares of Elon Musk's companies rose significantly, thus the "market faith" indirectly confirms that SpaceX will do well in the near future.

Another indicator confirming the correctness of SpaceX's strategy is that the Chinese are actively copying the Starship/Superheavy concept in their Long March 9 launch vehicle. China is also participating in the race to deploy various types of satellites in space.


RN Long March 9

Since the 20th century, when such an opportunity arose, the United States has always preferred to conduct “non-contact” combat operations from the maximum possible distance, without entering into direct combat contact with the enemy.

In contrast, Russia mainly conducts “contact” close combat, which we can see now, within the framework of the special military operation (SMO) in Ukraine, where long-range weapons are used only as a supplement to the main combat actions, conducted “at point-blank range” on the line of combat contact (LBC).

Until now, “non-contact” combat could only be effectively conducted against a much weaker enemy; in any encounter with a stronger enemy, bloody close combat was unavoidable.

The dominance of one or more superpowers in outer space could lead to the fact that all those who do not have such capabilities could become “much weaker” opponents for them.

At the present time, gaining superiority or at least achieving parity in outer space with the United States and China is one of the most important, cornerstone tasks of Russia in ensuring national security in the future.
80 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    17 November 2024 04: 59
    If the program is successfully implemented, the cost of launching a payload into orbit will be significantly reduced – the cost of launching one kilogram of cargo on a super-heavy launch vehicle could be cheaper than any other launch vehicle in history, which in itself would be something of a miracle.

    This is a purely Russian myth - that the most important thing in space is a rocket, while a kilogram of a satellite costs significantly more than the price of launching a kilogram into orbit. There is nothing to talk about something more serious, like an interplanetary station. The space launch market 10-15 years ago was less than 10 billion dollars, while the space communications market was under 300 billion. We could not lay claim to the latter, so we were proud of our role as a cab driver for rich gentlemen. It is difficult to say what Musk's prices are, he is definitely making a satellite grouping with someone's serious investments.
    For example, this is space tourism, right up to hotels in orbit, with a level of comfort that is currently unthinkable.
    Well, you might as well build hotels on Erebus. If there were a lot of people willing to sleep tied up and relieve themselves in zero gravity, then the Hiltons and others would have done it long ago, they have a lot of money.
    growing crystals for microchips in space
    This is the most paradoxical proposal from space enthusiasts. On the one hand, radiation-resistant electronics are needed to work in space; astronauts with their eyes closed sometimes see flashes from the tracks of particles flying at high speeds; ordinary tablets on the ISS get several broken pixels per year. Let's produce electronics in orbit! Let's develop radiation-resistant steppers for work in zero gravity! After all, TSMC and ASML probably don't know how to produce electronics with a defect rate of less than 20% using a process technology of less than 10 nm in terrestrial conditions, but as soon as they send production into space, it will start working right away.
    At the present time, gaining superiority or at least achieving parity in outer space with the United States and China is one of the most important, cornerstone tasks of Russia in ensuring national security in the future.

    Something tells me that this is somewhere beyond the capabilities, besides - there is no desire on the part of the management. In words, "Sfera" has long been advertised, but they decided to start allocating funding somewhere in 2020, and in completely insufficient quantities and most likely without control over the spending of funds.
    The only way to establish parity is a nuclear war. So that competitors will have no time for space. Or aliens will give us satellite factories. And the rest is science fiction.
    1. +4
      17 November 2024 05: 37
      Donald Trump's victory... will ensure US dominance in space...

      What do you mean - without Trump, the US has neither Musk, nor dominance in space, "STARSHIP"? And other non-state companies with the goal of space exploration, nor NASA?

      You made me laugh, Andrey... by the way, the next launch (18th) of "STARSHIP" is planned for November 6th.
      1. 0
        18 November 2024 14: 58
        And yet, the fact that Musk is now part of Trump's team and will head the Ministry of Government Efficiency and other state structures will have a very beneficial effect on the development of his programs and their state and attracted financing. Now he is guaranteed "Green Street".
        And his (as in his time with our S.P. Korolev) all interests and aspirations are not on war and militarization of near-Earth space, but on near and distant space, on flights to planets and asteroids, on creation of settlements and scientific-industrial bases outside the Earth. If S.P. Korolev had not strived from his youth to fly to Mars, we would never have seen the first Soviet satellite and all those achievements that followed. Progress is driven by ENTHUSIASTS.
        And Musk is exactly like that.
        Therefore, it is a great pity that in Russia we do not have, and unfortunately, in the current conditions, neither our own Trump nor our own Musk.
        Quote: Mikhail Drabkin
        You made me laugh, Andrey... by the way, the next launch (18th) of "STARSHIP" is planned for November 6th.

        I'll definitely have to watch it, I missed the previous launch. After all, something practically unthinkable is happening in the rocket and space industry of planet Earth.
        1. 0
          18 November 2024 22: 41
          Quote: bayard
          which we don't have in Russia and, unfortunately, are impossible in the current conditions

          There are certainly enthusiasts. It's just that money was first given to football and Olympic enthusiasts in Russia, and then to tank biathlon enthusiasts. When Rogozin headed Roscosmos, the most prestigious and well-paid job in his department after a middle manager was a PR specialist, not a designer. Now, there is a theory among job seekers in state corporations that you need to get a job in a company for a while until the state requires the company to deliver work and have time to move to a new organization when the deadline for demand for the money spent approaches.
          1. -1
            19 November 2024 00: 06
            Quote: gsev
            There are certainly enthusiasts. It's just that money was first given to football and Olympic enthusiasts in Russia, and then to tank biathlon enthusiasts

            That's the point, Musk didn't get any money at the beginning of his career either, and he converted his father's inheritance into his education. And he stubbornly went towards his goal. He made his career not only as an engineering genius, but also with his business acumen and extraordinary/outstanding breakthrough abilities. He knew how to present his ideas, convince investors and NOT DECEIVE them with the RESULT. If he had just been an outstanding engineer or even a designer, he would never have been able to implement the projects that are now flying, solving problems and making money.
            And what a brilliant move it was to take up automobile construction! It brought him a huge income, he became the trendsetter of an entire area of ​​automobile construction, and provided the means to realize his main goal - Practical Cosmonautics, the construction of heavy reusable launch vehicles that open the way to flights to the planets and the launch of Mankind into Space.
            And many of the ideas that he is now implementing he took/gleaned from the projects of S.P. Korolev, having received (for money) access to the Roscosmos Archives and having spent more than 2 years studying them. Old-timers of Roscosmos remember him well. And what is interesting and unusual for American and Western society in general, he always emphasizes the continuity of his projects from the projects and ideas of S.P. Korolev. This is unusual and very noble for an American. Probably because he is not an American by birth.
            And it is precisely these people - smart/brilliant, energetic, assertive, able to captivate both the authorities and the masses, capable of attracting money not just from large banks, but ... from ordinary citizens with an average income AND NOT DECEIVING THEM. We don't see people like that. It is possible (and most likely) that the environment is unsuitable, non-sovereign, and the authorities are ... very ... very ... peculiar.
            Attract money for embezzlement, share with whoever needed to and run away abroad - there were plenty of them. Just look at the "Pension Reform" of our dear president. What was the PR of the head of state himself... and all those who believed were stupidly and banally ROBBED. And no one even blushed. But the crooks simply robbed millions of Russian citizens of monstrous amounts of money. Remember? "Non-state pension funds" that the president promoted SO much?
            But everyone has already forgotten.
            Everyone has already forgotten about the retirement age, a circus with horses. Five years of life were stolen from people... But many simply did not live to see this pension and will not live to see it.
            1. 0
              19 November 2024 01: 22
              Quote: bayard
              That’s the point, that no one gave Musk money at the beginning of his career either, and he converted his father’s inheritance into his education.

              In the West and in Russia, the attitude to issuing and receiving investments is slightly different. I have a friend who entered a university in South Korea through a Russian school and his mother is convincing her son not to take investments to create a business from the sons of, if not South Korean oligarchs, then from people whose main problem is where to invest their free money. In Russia, he was considered a loser compared to his classmates. It is quite possible that he will soon be supplying cars or auto parts from Korea or China to Russia through intermediate countries. Moreover, their family has already received access to such a channel.
              Quote: bayard
              Everyone has already forgotten about the retirement age, it’s a circus with horses.

              By the way, today at the main customer's company I was discussing the pension issue with my peers. As I understand it, none of us will be able to receive a pension until we are 70 years old, and hardly any of us will live to that age. In principle, it is a worthy payment that none of us made the necessary attempts to kill Yeltsin and his henchmen either in 1991 or in 1993.
        2. 0
          18 November 2024 23: 05
          Musk will fulfill the dream of the Soviet people and plant apple trees on Mars
          1. 0
            19 November 2024 00: 08
            With his talent and drive, and thanks to the potential of the United States, this could very well happen.
            1. 0
              19 November 2024 01: 28
              Quote: bayard
              also thanks to the potential of the USA

              On scientific websites, China's potential is considered to be the highest. Some believe that by 2060, China will be the first to build a thermonuclear power plant and create a photonic engine. Musk skims the cream of talented engineers from all over the world. It is quite possible that in 5 or 10 years, the Chinese will stop making engineering calculations for the US aerospace industry. If Putin stops squandering money on television, sports, theaters and other show-offs, then he has a chance to stop the brain drain from Russia to the West and the East.
              1. -1
                19 November 2024 02: 28
                Quote: gsev
                On scientific websites, China's potential is considered to be the highest.

                The same was once said about Japan. And where is this Japan now? What will happen to the Chinese economy when the US and EU close their markets? Africa alone won't get you very far, and Western TNCs are already promoting India and Southeast Asian countries as producers of all kinds of consumer goods to replace Chinese goods. Labor in India is cheaper, and logistics are more convenient in India. And by cutting China off from the oil of the Middle East and the raw material base of Africa, they will plunge China into a deep recession. And they have every chance of doing this, although they have lost a lot of time, too much.
                I don't wish anything bad on China, but I think that now the entire burden of confrontation with the USA and other West will fall on them. And how China will show itself and manifest itself is a question. China can manage to increase its strategic nuclear forces to 1000 nuclear warheads and build another aircraft carrier, but if they are deprived of markets and a Cold War is imposed, anything can happen. And China is getting old. And it has no allies - it believed that it did not need them and in the end convinced those who could become them of this. They will definitely not go into war and confrontation with the USA for China - it's just that China is no better for them, but at the same time much more incomprehensible and unpredictable ... They will trade. How profitable and safe it will be for them. And Russia will have a lot of its own worries and troubles. To become for China the same as China has become for Russia in recent years - yes. But we have a military alliance and mutual assistance treaty with North Korea. And if the US doesn't push against Russia, Russia won't get into the dump. We've been fighting for three years already. So China now needs to step up its military programs and prepare for the US containment policy. That is, for the Cold War. At a minimum.
                And think about allies.
                And not about vassals, to whom no one will go.
                1. 0
                  19 November 2024 03: 15
                  Quote: bayard
                  and Western TNCs are already promoting India and Southeast Asian countries as producers of all kinds of consumer goods to replace Chinese ones

                  India is a little different from China. It may well be that all the promotion of India as a supplier of cheap products to Europe will come down to the appearance in India of resellers of Chinese products for sale to Europe. By the way, something similar happened with Pakistan. There, Pakistani industrialists took American money to create production, bought goods in China and sold them to the West. By the way, the poor in India are not able to buy goods produced in factories in India that use Western technologies and Western management. In addition, after promotion, India may become a bigger problem for the West than China.
                  Quote: bayard
                  But we have a military alliance and mutual assistance treaty with North Korea.
                  Russia has an agreement with Kazakhstan and Armenia. But China is a more reliable partner even without an agreement than these countries.
                  It is beneficial for Russia to have good relations with the DPRK, Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, India, and Afghanistan. However, after the collapse of the USSR, Russia is forced to establish industrial cooperation with China. Industrial electronics from China are 2 times cheaper for any small company than French ones for Alrosa or Gazprom. (9000 rubles for a frequency converter from China at the beginning of 2024 versus 22 rubles for a frequency converter from France at the beginning of 000.) By the way, it is easier to buy or sell something in China than in the DPRK.
                  1. -1
                    19 November 2024 05: 19
                    Russia will certainly trade and maintain good relations with China, but the vector of American attention and pressure will very soon be sharply shifted to China. And there is a consensus on this in American society.
                    As for India, under Trump everything will be done to ensure that all production returns to the United States. The problem of high cost will be solved by canceling government spending on the maintenance and benefits for idle blacks and Latino migrants and many other subsidies and the maintenance of useless ballast. Social housing for idle people will most likely also cease to be available. The infrastructure in the United States is very dilapidated, it is necessary to put in order the cities and their communications, roads, bridges, tunnels, build new enterprises, restart the economy. The collapse or abolition of the Federal Reserve will also not happen without a strong shake-up and a drop in living standards. And this will be a blessing for the future of the United States - as under Roosevelt. Perhaps even analogues of "labor armies" will be created, where the unemployed will be required to serve labor service in socially useful jobs for a fixed, but low salary. Blacks will be taught to WORK again, and all the criminals, of whom there will be many more, will be placed in prisons and used in production there. All illegal migrants will be deported, the middle class will be sharply reduced in numbers for the entire period of Industrialization. As a result of these measures, the cost of domestic goods will become much lower, maybe even several times lower, and protective duties will be introduced for imports, and draconian ones at that, and the deductions from them will fill the budget and go towards upgrading infrastructure, reforming education and health care. So India may not have much of a prospect in the US market either. A "Revolution of Conservative Forces" is coming in the US - as some observers there are already calling it. So it would be a good idea for China to turn to the classics, namely to the last works (including the unfinished ones) of I.V. Stalin. How he planned to fight the crisis of overproduction and convert the free time of workers for their development, improving education, obtaining new specialties, increasing their cultural time and more time for family and raising children. Stalin worked on the Theory of Developed Socialism. Many of his ideas and proposals could be very useful for China in the conditions of the Cold War and the crisis of overproduction and a decrease in production levels due to sharply reduced sales markets.
                    1. 0
                      19 November 2024 07: 27
                      Quote: bayard
                      the middle class will be sharply reduced in numbers throughout the period of Industrialization

                      If this happens, the United States will really begin to degrade and yield its leadership to the Chinese civilization.
                      Quote: bayard
                      Many of his ideas and proposals could be very useful for China.

                      Mao came to power in China largely because he ignored Stalin's advice. If Stalin had lived another 10 years, his MGB would have destroyed the country in 1960.
                      Quote: bayard
                      As a result of these measures, the cost price of domestic goods will become much lower, perhaps even several times lower.

                      The cost price is reduced thanks to scientific achievements and the painstaking work of designers and technologists. You can save on wages and optimize the management system as much as you like, but the company will inevitably lose when competitors pay for the services of the most talented and successful designer. And it does not necessarily have to be very high, the main thing is that it is worthy in the eyes of the employee. And the designer should not be hindered by bosses-straddlers like Rogozin and Shoigu.
                      1. -1
                        19 November 2024 15: 47
                        Quote: gsev
                        If this happens, the United States will really begin to degrade and yield its leadership to the Chinese civilization.

                        When Roosevelt led the US out of the Great Depression, when all the unemployed were gathered into Labor Armies and worked for $1 a day building roads, tunnels, bridges, interchanges, factories, shipyards, power plants, etc., etc., etc. ... probably someone also thought that the US had lost something. But when WWII ended, it turned out that the US GDP was 50% of the world's total.
                        Quote: gsev
                        Mao came to power in China largely by ignoring Stalin's advice.

                        Mao came to power ONLY thanks to comrade Stalin. He supported him during the fight against the Japanese conquerors (although Mao did not really fight them), and when Chiang Kai-shek betrayed Stalin, renounced neutrality and decided to completely defect to the USA, it was comrade Stalin who handed over captured weapons of the Kwantung Army to Mao and his formations and ensured him a quick and decisive victory for power in China.
                        Maybe you remember WHO laid the foundation for the Industrialization of China from such a low start? Who built hundreds of basic enterprises with free technology transfer, practically without any restrictions? And China never fully paid for those enterprises when Mao fell out with Khrushchev. Mao was already establishing contacts with the USA through his wife.
                        Quote: gsev
                        ignored Stalin's advice.

                        Really?? And who is making films in China about how Mao allegedly almost agreed to become Stalin's successor and bring China into the USSR?? It's funny and crazy of course, but Mao really did propose bringing China into the USSR, but Stalin didn't go for it, just as he didn't go for the inclusion of Bulgaria and a number of other countries that were striving for this into the USSR. He formed a bloc of countries of the Socialist Commonwealth. He built the CMEA and an alternative to the US dollar international settlement system based on the transferable ruble.
                        Or are you talking about the Chinese "war with sparrows", which almost ruined Chinese agriculture? Or about how he ordered the construction of furnaces for smelting "iron" in every village and almost in every yard? Do you remember these eccentricities? But that was later. After Stalin's death.
                        Quote: gsev
                        The cost price is reduced thanks to scientific achievements and the painstaking work of designers and technologists.

                        I think that's exactly what Trump is going to do.
                        Quote: gsev
                        The designer should not be hindered by bosses-gaskets like Rogozin and Shoigu.

                        Well, the example of the modern Russian Federation is not an example at all. Under Stalin in the post-war period, two design groups - Mil and Kamov, were offered to create two design cooperatives on a state contract, they were given one building of a former furniture factory for both of them, an order was made and they were given complete freedom of creativity. Thus, two design schools of domestic helicopter construction appeared. Here is an example of a state approach and maximum realization of creative design potential. These cooperatives became state design bureaus already under Khrushchev, when he was destroying all of Stalin's legacy.
                      2. -2
                        21 November 2024 06: 50
                        Quote: bayard
                        It's funny and nonsense of course, but Mao really did propose to include China into the USSR.

                        In free or simply competitive elections in the USSR in 1950, Mao would have most likely won, not Stalin. Stalin understood this, and therefore did not dare to annex either Eastern Turkestan, Bulgaria, or China to the USSR. The experience of annexing the Baltics and the Western regions of Belarus and Ukraine demonstrated to him that ordinary people would prefer any way of life to the Soviet one.
                      3. 0
                        21 November 2024 13: 20
                        What kind of stream of consciousness are you talking about, young man? laughing fool
                      4. -1
                        21 November 2024 21: 30
                        Quote: bayard
                        What kind of stream of consciousness are you talking about, young man?

                        I have a friend who was on the election commission for the Moscow elections, either to replace a deputy who died or was convicted at the beginning of Gorbachev's rule before Sakharov was released from exile. According to her, voters wrote such blatant anti-Soviet slander on one third of the ballots that the Voice of America radio station did not dare to air it. But even the ballot form did not allow voting alternatively. Mao, who was not involved in collectivization, mass repressions, deportations of peoples, or persecution of culture and science, looked preferable against Stalin. Khrushchev won against Malenkov, Molotov, and Zhukov when, in response to Malenkov's threats to party apparatus workers, he said: "This is our Soviet apparatus and we must protect it."
                      5. 0
                        22 November 2024 02: 13
                        Horses, people, anti-Soviet sentiments and the delirium of an old Trotskyist were all mixed together.
                        Did any of your relatives suffer from the "Stalinist repressions"? Not mentally - physically? In a camp, or shot on the day of arrest? I have such people in my family, and I know WHOSE fault they suffered, what it was like in a camp, in exile, and how, having shot a person on the day of arrest, the Trotskyists - the main authors of the terror of 1937-1938, told relatives that the arrested relative received 10 years without the right to correspondence. That is how my great-uncle was shot - the commander of the 25th shock Chapayev division, my friend's grandfather - a priest, from the Vorontsov family on his mother's side, already being off the staff. I knew some descendants of the White Movement, generals and officers of Kolchak's headquarters, very vaguely (due to my youth at the time), but I remember old General Borodin (he did not die soon after that famous defeat of Chapayev's headquarters, after the beginning of the Red Army's offensive across the Ural River, his death was simulated, and he was taken away wounded ... to a remote village in the forests of the Southern Urals), I was friends with his grandson in childhood. There were different people in the Soviet Union, many suffered from the rampage of the Trotskyists in the late 30s, but not from Stalin. And therefore, Stalin was never blamed, even after the collapse of the USSR.
                        And it was Stalin who created your state, and to this day, old Jews probably have portraits of Stalin hanging in every home - as the founder of the state. And he organized support, and recognized it as the first, and strengthened it with personnel. Who was Golda Meir before her assignment to Israel? How many officers and generals, Heroes of the Soviet Union, did Stalin send to create the Israeli army?
                        Forgot ?
                        Have you forgotten who put out the ovens of Auschwitz?
                        And the mother of my school friend was born right there - in Auschwitz.
                        Don't choke on your own bile spitting at the founder of the Jewish state.
                        Quote: gsev
                        Khrushchev won against Malenkov, Molotov and Zhukov

                        Khrushchev is an old Trotskyist, he was exactly that spy - the most valuable for MI-6, whose name even the guys from the Red Chapel could not reveal, only the fact of his presence in the Politburo. Stalin was never able to identify this spy. This Khrushchev carried out a coup d'etat, defeated the magnificent Stalinist cadres and almost ruined the Country and the State, destroyed the unity of the Socialist Commonwealth of Countries, destroyed the cooperative sector of the economy, and did much other evil.
                        Is he your idol?
                        This scoundrel and tyrant?
                        Not surprised .
                      6. -1
                        22 November 2024 12: 30
                        Quote: bayard
                        Is he your idol?
                        This scoundrel and tyrant?

                        Khrushchev is an idol of many Russian citizens, under whom people stopped dying en masse from hunger and mass repressions and expulsions of entire nations ceased. By the way, your theory about Trotskyists as the initiators of repressions does not stand up to criticism. Repressions began after Trotsky was removed from power and exiled and ceased with the rise of the "Trotskyist" Khrushchev to the top of power. It turns out that Stalin allowed the Trotskyists to spin him like a top?
                        Quote: bayard
                        Stalin was never able to identify this spy.

                        Were you able to identify him? Was there a spy? In general, since 1947, Stalin, Beria, Abakumov, Belkin actually acted as agents of influence for Allen Dulles, initiating repressions in European countries against representatives of the national current of the local socialist communist parties.
                        Quote: bayard
                        the most valuable to MI6, whose name even the guys from the Red Chapel couldn't reveal

                        How do you imagine the possibility for German oppositionists (unreliable ones who should be under the close attention of the Gestapo) to penetrate the secrets of the intelligence of a foreign country?
                      7. 0
                        22 November 2024 16: 35
                        Quote: gsev
                        Khrushchev is an idol of many Russian citizens

                        Don't fantasize, he was despised even during his lifetime, and after all his "exploits" under the supreme power it was simply disgusting.
                        But in your environment such touching affection is quite understandable.
                        Quote: gsev
                        People stopped dying of hunger en masse

                        Under Stalin, thanks to the adoption of a whole range of measures.
                        But under Khrushchev, peasant collective farmers began to have their allotted plots of land for gardens and vegetable gardens taken away from them again, and draconian taxes were imposed on garden/fruit trees and livestock. In desperation, people began to cut down their own fruit trees to get rid of the enslaving taxes. But there really was no longer any hunger - Stalin's measures and programs had yielded results. Including the "Program for Changing Nature" with the planting of windbreak forests and forests. Thus, dry winds and dust storms ceased in the south of the Ukrainian SSR and Russia. And the consequences of the Great Patriotic War gradually became a thing of the past.
                        Quote: gsev
                        and mass repressions ceased

                        What do you mean by this word? The Trotskyists waited for Stalin's death, destroyed his cadres, destroyed the unity of the Socialist Camp with their own feigned stupidity, renamed the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) into some kind of CPSU, marking this as the victory of Trotskyism over Stalin's Bolsheviks. And then they simply waited for a change of generations and a convenient opportunity.
                        Quote: gsev
                        The repressions began after Trotsky's removal

                        Yes Yes - his supporters.
                        Yagoda (Sverdlov's cousin, it was through Sverdlov that Trotsky crawled into the Bolshevik Party, although until 1917 he was their ardent opponent and they hated and could not stand each other with Lenin), many of his supporters in the party and economic leadership of the country (there were a lot of them then). And those same repressions of 1937 began in revenge for Stalin's Constitution with universal equal and secret voting in elections - realizing that they would be rejected at the very first elections and they would lose power. Stalin's request to reconsider the decision of the congress was ignored and they began their bacchanalia .. It was necessary to urgently "strengthen" the NKVD cadres with Stalin's Call of Komsomol members - strong, proven, morally and mentally HEALTHY. And then the pervert Yezhov was replaced by the clever Beria and the rampant repressions ended. The review of the cases of the innocently convicted began. Many were saved.
                        And who was the most furious among us? Who shot the most by the decision of his own "Troika"? Who broke the most lives?
                        Khrushchev! And his Moscow "troika".
                        Quote: gsev
                        Was there a spy?

                        Of course there was.
                        Quote: gsev
                        Stalin, Beria, Abakumov, and Belkin actually acted as agents of influence for Allen Dulles, initiating repressions in European countries against representatives of the national current of the local socialist communist parties.

                        The normal work of selecting leadership personnel and purging the dross of nationalists was underway.
                        Quote: gsev
                        How do you see the possibility from the German opposition?

                        I was wrong, we are talking about our agents in MI6 and the leading structures of NATO intelligence. These were the guys from Cambridge.
                        Khrushchev was a legendary figure - he lived under a legend, hiding his origins and diligently portraying himself as a "village idiot", just like Andropov.
                      8. 0
                        22 November 2024 21: 44
                        Quote: bayard
                        These were the guys from Cambridge.

                        So the man who recruited the guys from Cambridge also did not escape Stalin-Beria's persecution. The rise of Soviet intelligence coincided with the times when Trotsky had not yet been expelled from the USSR. The Beriyas, Abakumovs and Yezhovs simply ate away at the foundation laid by Soviet intelligence officers of the 1920s. Incidentally, it was Stalin and his entourage's desire to repress independent communist politicians in the socialist countries of Europe that led to Philby's exposure, when he was forced to make inquiries about Field in the US intelligence services.
                      9. 0
                        22 November 2024 21: 46
                        Quote: bayard
                        The normal work of selecting leadership personnel and purging the dross of nationalists was underway.

                        Where nationalists came to power in socialist countries (China, North Korea, Mongolia, Vietnam), the governments there are now not hostile to Russia.
                      10. 0
                        22 November 2024 21: 54
                        Nationalism comes in different forms. In Europe, it's all complicated. Even in the East. Hitler was also a nationalist. And Bandera.
                      11. -1
                        22 November 2024 22: 02
                        Quote: bayard
                        Nationalism comes in different forms.

                        The communists repressed under Stalin in Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria were not enemies of the Russians or citizens of their countries. Moreover, the repressions against them were organized by Allen Dulles. Stalin, Belkin, Abakumov and Beria simply carried out the will of the head of the CIA special operations department Dulles because of their narrow-mindedness. The internationalists - opponents of the communist-nationalists in the socialist countries of Europe are simply less intelligent people who are incapable of finding the optimal path for the development of their countries and thoughtlessly shift the responsibility for thinking to Stalin.
                      12. 0
                        22 November 2024 22: 33
                        Well, Khrushchev was definitely a good guy? Right?
                        And Andropov? Uh - head.
                        And Gorbachev is a Sage and an Apostle!!
                        Yeltsin is by definition a Saint! And a Genius!!
                        Medvedev is a Hero!!!
                        And Stalin, Beria and Abakumov are fools and at Dulles' beck and call.
                        Have you forgotten anything?

                        The Stalin era ended in 1955.
                        And his legacy has not been completely drunk away to this day by those who admired Khrushchev and Trotsky.
                      13. -1
                        23 November 2024 00: 40
                        Quote: bayard
                        And his legacy has not been completely drunk away to this day by those who admired Khrushchev and Trotsky.

                        Khrushchev's legacy is the primacy in the development of rocket and nuclear technology, modern civil aviation, the absence of Stalin's or Cheka's tyranny. The revolution of 1991 was brought about by the FSB and special departments in the armed forces. Especially in the national republics. Khrushchev simply did not allow L.P. Beria to destroy the USSR and unite Germany under Bonn's rule in 1953 immediately after Stalin's death.
                      14. 0
                        23 November 2024 00: 42
                        Quote: gsev
                        The 1991 revolution was brought about by the FSB

                        There was no FSB back then.
                      15. 0
                        23 November 2024 01: 45
                        Quote: guest
                        There was no FSB back then.

                        And when the name changed from KGB to FSB or SBU, nothing extraordinary was required from the employees. Those who made decisions against the will of their immediate superiors were in the minority.
                      16. 0
                        23 November 2024 12: 47
                        Quote: gsev
                        And when the name changed from KGB to FSB

                        So the name change happened later.
                      17. 0
                        23 November 2024 13: 53
                        Quote: gsev
                        Khrushchev's legacy is leadership in the development of rocket and nuclear technology

                        laughing This is Stalin's legacy!! And the curator of these projects Beria. Khrushch, having seized power, simply inherited these projects from his predecessors. He understood nothing in these areas because he was uneducated, but was extremely impudent and self-willed.
                        Quote: gsev
                        modern civil aviation,

                        What do you know about Soviet Civil Aviation before WWII?
                        She wasn't there?
                        There was. And several types of passenger aircraft, designed specifically as passenger aircraft, flew in the USSR along established routes. No need to stretch Sova (Khrushchev) onto the Globe of Civil Aviation. He almost ruined military aviation and military shipbuilding in the USSR because of his nonsense, destroyed and repurposed a bunch of design bureaus ... In a word, he waved a shash ... a broom like a scarecrow in a vegetable garden.
                        Quote: gsev
                        The 1991 revolution was carried out by the FSB and special departments in the armed forces.

                        The State Coup (!) was carried out by the Trotskyist Politburo and the Central Committee of the CPSU. The KGB (not the FSB) was only one (but the main) instrument in the hands of the Trotskyist conspirators.
                        Quote: gsev
                        and special departments in the armed forces.

                        Maybe it would be better to remember about the Political Departments?
                        How many political workers "suddenly" received appointments to command positions? On the very eve of the coup? In order to paralyze the healthy initiative and self-organization of the Officer Corps in the conditions of the collapse of the legitimate (Soviet) power in the Country.
                        Quote: gsev
                        Especially in the national republics.

                        Oh yes, it was Khrushch who began to cultivate the so-called "national elites" in the union republics, violating the practice that a representative of a local nationality was appointed only\exclusively\maximum as the 2nd secretary of the local Central Committee of the Communist Party. It was Khrushch who cultivated Nazism and nationalism in the national republics. That is why he is cursed by the people's memory.
                        Quote: gsev
                        Khrushchev simply did not allow L.P. Beria to destroy the USSR and unite Germany under the rule of Bonn in 1953 immediately after Stalin's death.

                        The unification of Germany and the withdrawal of the occupation troops of England, the USA and France, which had attached itself to them, was planned by Stalin from the very beginning. And we were not going to keep our own 500-strong group there. The USA had to get out across the ocean, the English to England, the French to their vineyards. And there would be no occupation troops left in Western (!) Europe, and a united Germany with a neutral status would become our reliable trading partner and ally. That was Stalin's plan. And his opponents were England and the USA.
                        Well, and about the collapse of the USSR by Beria is completely funny - it was Khrushch who organized the conspiracy to collapse the USSR into national republics while Stalin was still alive. And it was he who incited Kuznetsov and Co. to create the "Communist Party of Russia"), by the way, they did not give up Khrushch under investigation. But Khrushch managed to destroy the unity of the Socialist Bloc, undermined the authority of the USSR and the World Communist Movement with his "exposures of Stalin", collapsed the Soviet economy in the consumer sector by destroying production cooperatives, which is why the USSR did not catch its breath even until its very death at the hands of Gorbachev / Yeltsin.
                      18. -2
                        23 November 2024 19: 16
                        Quote: bayard
                        There were. And several types of passenger aircraft were designed specifically as passenger aircraft.

                        The basis of civil aviation under Stalin were copies of foreign aircraft. If there had been no threat of war, Stalin would have killed Polikarpov, Tupolev, Myasishchev, Petlyakov, and Bartini in prison. Under Khrushchev, the only aircraft designer to be repressed was Mikulin. But Mikulin demanded a very radical change in the foundations of the socialist state, demanding that the party allow outstanding engineers to have harems and such a salary that they could buy new concubines for their harems. In order to raise wages in agriculture, Khrushchev then went on a radical reduction in the salaries of the KGB, MVD, designers, and scientists, and forced Mikulin to work not in a sharashka, but as a freelancer in medicine, designing medical equipment and working on health preservation methods.
                      19. 0
                        23 November 2024 23: 04
                        You have a very... very unhealthy imagination.
                        Try contacting a specialist.
                      20. -2
                        23 November 2024 19: 19
                        Quote: bayard
                        And there would be no occupation troops left in Western (!) Europe

                        In 1947, the CIA launched Operation Split. Only Stalin's death delayed the collapse of socialism and the disintegration of the USSR until 1991. Read the book "Operation Split". It vividly describes the incorrigible features of the Soviet secret services.
                      21. 0
                        23 November 2024 23: 05
                        Yes, yes, the split and disintegration are clearly visible. But this is no longer my concern.
                      22. -1
                        24 November 2024 01: 01
                        Quote: bayard
                        Yes, yes, the split and disunity are clearly visible.

                        Sudoplatov also wrote about the inadequate use of the USSR's special services. Read how he was forced to kill Kerensky and Tito! But just a few years after Tito's death, states hostile to Russia emerged on the ruins of neutral Yugoslavia. Kerensky was simply an obstacle in the mobilization of all emigrants from Eastern Europe to destroy the USSR. Stephen Stewart simply outlined the main problems facing Russia's leaders more succinctly, clearly and intelligibly than Sudoplatov. If Russia had been headed by a politician a little more stupid than Putin, he would not have been able to keep the FSB from trying to fight Afghanistan, Finnish national minorities and others.
                      23. -1
                        23 November 2024 19: 27
                        Quote: bayard
                        And it was he who incited Kuznetsov and Co. to create the "Communist Party of Russia"), by the way, they did not give up Khrushch under investigation.

                        For some reason it seems to me that Stalin killed Kuznetsov, Popov, Pavlov because he considered them smart, and left Khrushchev alive simply because he considered him narrow-minded. It is unlikely that Kuznetsov considered himself more stupid than Khrushchev and followed all of Khrushchev's recommendations and simply took Khrushchev's advice seriously.
                      24. 0
                        23 November 2024 23: 06
                        Quote: gsev
                        For some reason it seems to me

                        This happens .
    2. 0
      17 November 2024 05: 47
      What a pessimist you are! Again, "a carriage without a horse - no way!"
      I think the article somewhat embellished the desire of everyone and everything to get into the space business, but Elon Musk has undoubtedly accelerated the trend of mastering near space.
      I hope for a speedy solution to the problem of cosmic radiation - this is currently the main obstacle for man to begin living outside the earth.
      As for Russia - well, we don't have Musk, only Rogozins... No.
      1. +3
        17 November 2024 08: 05
        Quote: Sanwenmi
        As for Russia - well, we don't have Musk, only Rogozins...
        Rather, there is no system that could produce Musk and throw him to the very top. There are Rogozins, Usmanovs and Rotenbergs...
        1. -1
          17 November 2024 20: 36
          Quote: Luminman
          Quote: Sanwenmi
          As for Russia - well, we don't have Musk, only Rogozins...
          Rather, there is no system that could produce Musk and throw him to the very top. There are Rogozins, Usmanovs and Rotenbergs...

          It's not just about the system...
          On what basis can we catch up with the United States?
          At the present time, gaining superiority or at least achieving parity in outer space with the United States and China is one of the most important, cornerstone tasks of Russia in ensuring national security in the future.

          laughing laughing laughing
          Venezuela, North Korea and Iran have the same problem of ensuring national security laughing laughing
          However, they have no strength.
          1. -1
            21 November 2024 06: 58
            Quote from tsvetahaki
            On what basis can we catch up with the United States?

            How did China overtake the entire world in TV and panel production and destroy TV production in the USA in 1998? Paid a Russian scientist for consultations on planning the production of this equipment using liquid crystal technology. Gaidar, just like you, told this person that Russia was hopelessly behind in TV production and instead of switching to LCD screen production, they gave permission to destroy the plant in Orudevo and scrap all the equipment. By the way, the liberals have not even been able to scrap the entire plant, although some businessmen bragged that some sold 20 trains of scrap metal from this plant alone.
      2. 0
        17 November 2024 11: 57
        I hope for a speedy solution to the problem of cosmic radiation - this is currently the main obstacle for man to begin living outside the earth.
        The main obstacle is weightlessness. There are, of course, individual cosmonauts who have spent about a year or more in orbit, but this is a monstrous mockery of the body.
        1. 0
          17 November 2024 12: 00
          Weightlessness can be easily overcome with rotation, so cosmic radiation is problem number 1. Although it is possible that it can also be easily overcome with a massive lead or similar shell.
          1. +1
            17 November 2024 12: 01
            Weightlessness can be easily overcome with rotation
            All that remains is to find out who actually did it and when. No science fiction books suggested.
            1. 0
              17 November 2024 12: 05
              Everything is done for the first time. And here the main criterion is experiment. As the author of the article writes, the cost of lifting large masses into orbit is decreasing, so I think such construction attempts will happen soon.
              1. 0
                17 November 2024 12: 27
                Well, I also think that it is impossible to do without the rotation of a spacecraft to create artificial gravity. However, the interests of those with large financial resources are still on the sidelines of such programs. By the way, about Musk's starting capital:
                1. +1
                  17 November 2024 12: 31
                  "All major modern fortunes are acquired in the most dishonest way" laughing
                  The main thing is that they spend it for good wink
                  1. +1
                    17 November 2024 12: 34
                    The main thing is that they spend it for good
                    This is the most important thing, however, they always spend it for their own benefit. In rare cases, something falls to others.
                2. 0
                  17 November 2024 15: 07
                  In Russia, we have tens of thousands of children who grew up with no less start-up capital. There is nothing to say about them at all, their limit is to build parks at government expense and organize art exhibitions, they could not start any business. request
                3. -2
                  17 November 2024 16: 48
                  The thing about Bill Gates is a complete lie: his mother was never on the board of directors of IBM, and Elon Musk's father was something like a small-time pawn.
          2. 0
            17 November 2024 16: 46

            Weightlessness can be easily overcome with rotation


            It would have been easy to win, both in the USA and in the USSR they conducted experiments on people staying in rotating "centrifuges" for a long time, I may be mistaken, but in the end, in order for people to feel comfortable, without consequences for their health, "centrifuges" with a diameter of 400 meters are needed, now there are no such technologies to somehow build all this and launch it in space and that would work for decades.
            1. 0
              17 November 2024 17: 23
              I think it's not the technology that's lacking, but the scale. It's not profitable to drag so much mass into space. And there's the same problem with radiation - there's no armor thick enough in space.
              1. 0
                17 November 2024 19: 33
                I think what's missing is not technology, but scale.


                There is a lack of everything, scale, technology, experience, cosmic radiation is just one of the problems that prevents life outside the Earth and is not the most difficult or even insignificant. We can start in order of what is missing and requires at least hundreds of years of development, learning, etc.:
                There is no closed biosphere capable of existing in isolation for at least tens of years and providing life support for at least a dozen people during this time.
                There is no nuclear reactor capable of operating in space, well, there simply isn’t one, it needs to be developed, tested, and here the cooling issues come into full swing, there simply aren’t the technologies available now to disperse tens of megawatts in space/vacuum.
                Artificial gravity, also no technology, no experience, no nothing, only experiments like Jupiter-2.
                Next, we somehow throw out of our calculations such an unpleasant thing as diffusion in materials and metal fatigue, and we will need our ship to have a full cycle of production inside itself, and there are no such technologies yet.
                And there are no people, well, we simply don’t have such experience, where there would be a mission of ten people in a closed space without the possibility of interrupting the mission for at least five to ten years. All known experiments conducted on Earth, when volunteers were locked in mock-ups of “ships” for a long time, ended very ambiguously.
                1. 0
                  18 November 2024 05: 32
                  Thank you for the detailed answer, of course there are a lot of problems ahead, and they are absolutely unsolvable if humanity does not recognize their priority and does not allocate resources for their solution in not just the necessary amount, but in excess.
          3. 0
            17 November 2024 19: 53
            Quote: Sunwenmin
            Weightlessness can be easily overcome with rotation, so cosmic radiation is problem number 1. Although it is possible that it can also be easily overcome with a massive lead or similar shell.


            No, lead cannot be used. In space, there is no gamma radiation, but fast particles. When they hit lead, they initiate a flow of X-ray radiation. Special polymers, or better yet... water. A layer of several meters will already be excellent protection, 10 meters - the radiation will be like on Earth.
            1. 0
              18 November 2024 05: 36
              Thank you, I didn't know about lead. Water is water, so much the better, this resource is always in demand. Now if only we could push through such a "megaproject" - a large rotating can with double walls in orbit laughing
        2. -1
          17 November 2024 15: 22
          The main obstacle is that no one really needs it, to send people into space. Resources on Earth are getting cheaper, there is apparently nowhere to put energy, since everyone wants green energy so much. Musk is not engaged in space for the sake of space, he makes accessible Internet all over the planet, taking money from all sorts of Iridiums and other small Internet operators. NASA needs to deliver astronauts to the ISS? They will. The Pentagon needs spy satellites? We will make them! And he himself - he was going to bring soil from Mars 10 years ago, but gave up - no one gave him money for it.
          1. +1
            17 November 2024 16: 09
            And he himself - 10 years ago he was going to bring soil from Mars,
            Well, we also had a project called "Phobos-Grunt", but it didn't work out. And he is an ordinary businessman going crazy with fat, like our Durov, who threw five-thousand-ruble notes around St. Petersburg. He was having fun.
            1. 0
              17 November 2024 16: 20
              Quote: Aviator_
              Well, we also had a project called "Phobos-Grunt", but it didn't work out.

              At least we built it and put it into orbit. And Musk just did some PR, and he is an effective manager as he should be, and not someone we call that. The party said - we need it, Musk said - we'll do it! And he sent all the workers to a 12-hour six-day week.
              In terms of American space, the story of Ukrainian businessman Polyakov is indicative. He bought the bankrupt American startup Firefly Space Systems, paid off his debts and completed a light rocket, having ambitious plans. But before SVO, the American government announced that this was an important technology - a light rocket - and it was not right for it to belong to a foreigner. And they took away the company. Everything is under surveillance there, not a fly can fly through
              1. 0
                17 November 2024 16: 37
                But before the SVO, the American government said that this was an important technology - a light rocket - and it was not right for it to belong to a foreigner. And they took away the company.
                A very smart decision. Especially for us.
      3. -1
        17 November 2024 15: 17
        Quote: Sunwenmin
        Again, "a carriage without a horse - it can't be!"

        Where did I write something like that? I wrote about the stupidity of non-businessmen telling how businessmen need it all, when they are not going to spend anything from their own pockets.
        Quote: Sunwenmin
        I hope for a speedy solution to the problem of cosmic radiation - this is currently the main obstacle for man to begin living outside the earth.

        Where is this problem? In orbit? So why live in orbit? Since the mid-seventies, we have more or less learned to live in orbit and that's it, for the sixth decade orbital stations have been doing God knows what, you can't find a popular science article that would tell about discoveries on the ISS, solid ground telescopes, interplanetary stations or unmanned telescopes. Now orbital stations are a waste of time, just to be on the safe side. You can protect yourself from radiation on Mars or the Moon simply under a layer of soil.
        Quote: Sunwenmin
        As for Russia - well, we don't have Musk, only Rogozins...

        We don't have anyone who would sponsor Musk for decades and rewrite laws for him. They started to lead it in 2003, if not earlier. Amazing people live there - they wanted results, so that rockets would fly into space, and not a beautiful report on intentions, which in a week everyone will forget and won't ask where the money went.
        1. -1
          17 November 2024 15: 28
          The radiation problem will still have to be solved - after all, without a long stay in space, it will not be possible to fly even to Mars. Therefore, it is necessary to solve the problems with production cycles in space, for the reproduction of everything necessary for a long flight. The Moon, Mars are only stages on the path to expansion into deep space.
          But there is an alternative path - to die quietly in our own filth on a planet that is becoming less and less suitable for life. We are currently moving along this path when we do not invest in space exploration.
          1. 0
            17 November 2024 15: 42
            Quote: Sunwenmin
            After all, without a long stay in space, it will not be possible to fly even to Mars.

            It takes half a year to fly to Mars, if you add a little more speed, it will be 4 months. Now interplanetary stations are sent on extremely slow orbits to save a drop of fuel. In general, the resistance of man and life in general to radiation is too underestimated, the radiation background in the mountains is much higher than on the plains, but for some reason people live much longer in the mountains. After all, the first life appeared 4 billion years ago, when potassium was emitting from everywhere much more strongly than now, we had to somehow get used to it.
            Quote: Sunwenmin
            Therefore, it is necessary to solve problems with production cycles in space, in order to reproduce everything necessary for a long flight.

            Specifically, it would be nice for the Russian Federation to solve this problem in Earth space. Production on other celestial bodies is not much more difficult than on ours.
            1. 0
              17 November 2024 15: 49
              Specifically, it would be nice for the Russian Federation to solve this problem in Earth space

              +100
              As for stability, I wouldn’t want to test my adaptability to radiation; it’s better to use protection to reduce the intensity to an acceptable level. wink
              1. 0
                17 November 2024 16: 23
                Quote: Sunwenmin
                As for stability, I wouldn’t want to test my adaptability to radiation; it’s better to use protection to reduce the intensity to an acceptable level.

                This is a solvable problem, storing water in the hull walls, lead underpants, etc. And sending seasoned 40-year-old men. Like those who went to conquer the Wild West.
    3. 0
      17 November 2024 10: 31
      Something tells me that this is somewhere beyond the capabilities, besides - there is no desire on the part of the management. In words, "Sfera" has long been advertised

      There is a commercial project and it is more likely to "take off" than Sphere. Bureau 1440
  2. 0
    17 November 2024 06: 24
    Spatial resolution in the visible wavelength range may presumably reach units of centimeters.
    It does not exceed 10 cm. Because of the properties of the Earth's atmosphere. The same reason why space telescopes have to be built to observe from outside the atmosphere, only in this case the other way around.

    Although... After the invention of technology adaptive optics ground-based telescopes (giant ones, by the way) have caught up with and even surpassed early space telescopes (small ones) in their capabilities. If a super-heavy launch vehicle were to launch a giant reconnaissance satellite with a 10-meter diameter "tube", with a filled aperture, and with adaptive optics (a flexible mirror that adjusts its shape in real time to compensate for atmospheric interference)... It might be less than 10 centimeters. Or maybe not. There is a possibility that 10 cm is the physical limit.
  3. 0
    17 November 2024 06: 52
    Since we have a country with a market economy, it is worth talking about the participation of large capital in scientific developments. After all, Elon Musk did not become a manager in several areas at once. Every idea that promises profit tempts a capitalist. He works for the future. There is a risk, but if the business succeeds, then success is guaranteed. And not a cent from the state treasury. This is what we need to think about. And dealing with money for the sake of the same money is a business that does not promise a future.
    1. +2
      17 November 2024 08: 02
      Quote: Nikolai Malyugin
      Since we have a country with a market economy, it is worth talking about the participation of large capital in scientific developments.
      Big capital is interested in something completely different, not some kind of scientific developments...
  4. +1
    17 November 2024 07: 12
    inconspicuous logs indicating the type and time of flight of enemy reconnaissance satellites. Did the author even serve? When he was a duty assistant, it was his direct responsibility to fill out a logbook, with everyone involved in removing equipment from shelters signing it. And if there was an urgent need to remove it during daylight hours, they would remove it during the break and quickly camouflage it. So he was definitely not inconspicuous. And everything that follows in the text is a paraphrase of the famous expression "I am the author, that's how I see it", but that's not analytics, but a personal opinion. The column was clearly wrong here.
  5. +3
    17 November 2024 08: 19
    SpaceX will be doing well in the near future.

    And before that, everything was bad.
  6. +2
    17 November 2024 10: 31
    SpaceX launched as planned and is already beginning its second lap. In the semicircle behind it, NASA and the rest of the companies are huffing and puffing, but somehow running ahead. Russia remained on the launch pads and stumbled on the trampoline.
    1. -8
      17 November 2024 10: 56
      But Russia has a 400, and does America have anything similar? I'm not even talking about a 500.
      1. +3
        17 November 2024 13: 30
        Quote from Lemur2023
        But Russia has a 400, and does America have anything similar? I'm not even talking about a 500.

        SM-6, SM-3
        Their analogues. And what about the navy, the country is a navy. Behind the ocean sits
  7. -3
    17 November 2024 11: 47
    "Today the winner is the one who has air supremacy..."
    And who says that we in the SVO have no air superiority? On the contrary, we have absolutely no analog! In addition to this air superiority, if only we had education! Then the SVO would not exist at all!
  8. +2
    17 November 2024 13: 27
    Of course, a significant share of the space services market will be orders from the US Department of Defense. Among other things, there will be so many reconnaissance satellites above our heads that any logbooks will lose all meaning – surveillance will be conducted in real time, 24/365.

    According to US intelligence, they already have a large number of remote sensing satellites on the Starlink platform and the number is growing rapidly.
    https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/11/nro-chief-you-cant-hide-from-our-new-swarm-of-spacex-built-spy-satellites/
    So far, more than 80 of these SpaceX-built spacecraft, each weighing just under a ton, have been launched on four Falcon 9 rockets. And that's not all.

    "We expect to quadruple the number of satellites we need to put into orbit over the next decade."

    And all this was while the US government was trying its best to crush Musk for his wrong views. What will happen now?
  9. 0
    17 November 2024 16: 54
    The spatial resolution of radar images from commercial low-orbit satellites, such as the Mission Solutions satellite line owned by satellite data provider Umbra, already reaches 16 centimeters.
    That's true. Well, sort of) However, for military purposes this data for some reason turned out to be absolutely useless. It doesn't matter at all whether it exists or not.
    This is clearly visible from the fact that the Ukrainian side is diligently supplied with data from the US. Ours, respectively, from ours. However, the troops of both sides began to receive real data for artillery and missile attacks only when drones came into play)
    Up to this point, no satellite data has allowed anyone to achieve any advantages whatsoever. I don't know what exactly is wrong, what specifically doesn't work in this system, but today, the satellite constellations of the opponents are only wasting billions of dollars.
    Who and what is completely sabotaging the use of data, I don't know. But it is happening. Until these incomprehensible problems are fixed, I personally would simply stop funding these parasites. It would be better to make more drones.
    1. 0
      18 November 2024 06: 32
      You are somewhat wrong. The question here is about the speed of processing and receipt of intelligence data by the consumer. UAVs, unlike satellites, provide data "online", while conventional satellites have a large delay. But the new Starshin satellites will transmit "online" via Starlink.
      1. 0
        18 November 2024 12: 00
        Unfortunately, I am very right. When the launch pad crashes within ten minutes of launch, the space slackers can print out their photos and wipe their asses with them. At the same time, there are no TECHNICAL problems in organizing the operational transmission of data. There are only organizational ones, including the launch of a sufficient number of observation satellites and repeaters. The problems, one and all, lie in the areas of organization and control.
  10. 0
    18 November 2024 09: 10
    Donald Trump is the #1 topic in the US, Russia and the world. He has a ton of plans and will do something grandiose everywhere. I'm interested in something else. The more he tightens the screws of reform, the stronger the resistance will be, both inside the country and outside the US. What is the likelihood that some "Albert Einstein" foundation won't organize a color revolution? They organize them all over the world, but why not at home? Or haven't their British friends arranged something out of the ordinary? With friends like that, you don't need enemies. Or has Ukraine not started blackmailing the Yankees into giving them more weapons? And what are the likely consequences?