Captured American M2A2 Bradley IFV put into service with the Russian Armed Forces

36
Captured American M2A2 Bradley IFV put into service with the Russian Armed Forces

One of the captured American M2A2 Bradley ODS-SA IFVs has been put into service with the Center group of forces of the Russian Armed Forces and is already actively participating in combat operations.

The American infantry fighting vehicle was abandoned by the retreating enemy after it was blown up by a mine during the clashes for the village of Sokol near Ocheretino. Russian soldiers captured and repaired the US-supplied IFV to the Kyiv regime.



Our servicemen name the good protection of this type of BMP as advantages of American armored vehicles, as well as a spacious and comfortable troop compartment with a ramp, where servicemen in full uniform and with weapons can be freely accommodated. However, the main problem when using Western equipment captured from the enemy in battle is the problem of access to unique spare parts and non-standard ammunition for the Russian Armed Forces.

Bradley copes well with its main function, which is to transport troops. The high rear with a ramp and the front engine ensure fast and convenient boarding/disembarkation of troops in the IFV, which is important in combat conditions. However, we should not forget that IFVs of this type are military equipment of the last century, which will inevitably be replaced by more modern machines.

Meanwhile, according to Military Watch Magazine, the Russian Armed Forces have already destroyed two-thirds of the weapons supplied to the Ukrainian army by the US tanks Abrams. A significant portion of Western military equipment models entered service with the "elite" 47th Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, which is suffering significant losses and has already managed to change several personnel.

36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    11 November 2024 15: 54
    all these occupied "sheds" would be rammed with TNT to the roof... and remotely directed to the positions of the fascists... especially since they will think that it is their brothers-in-arms coming... the equipment is shitty... and also with Ukrainian Armed Forces signs on the armor laughing
    *I think it could easily hold three tons of explosives.
    1. +6
      11 November 2024 15: 58
      Of course, but these zatrafeiny "sheds" are better suited for transporting personnel than the BTR-82 or the Matolyga, which is why they are used...
      1. -5
        11 November 2024 16: 02
        The soldier explained to you in the video... The armored personnel carrier is better.
        Or is your GOD Uncle SAM...then everything is clear?
        1. +4
          11 November 2024 16: 03
          The soldier explained to you in the video... The armored personnel carrier is better.
          Or is your GOD Uncle SAM...then everything is clear?

          Sorry sun but between the stories of a hooray "patriot" like you and the technical characteristics, I choose the technical characteristics, you keep on hooraying
          1. -4
            11 November 2024 16: 06
            well..go to the Ukrainian fascists..load yourself into the mattress barn..Lancet..I don't even give a damn about the performance characteristics of the KAL Abrams.
        2. +8
          11 November 2024 16: 31
          What does some "god" have to do with it? Objectively, we do not have an infantry fighting vehicle comparable in protection and convenience to the "Bradley". The troops were persistently pushed with BMP-3, BMD-4, which were already obsolete at the time of their creation.
        3. +5
          11 November 2024 16: 56
          The fighter said that the APC is better armed
      2. +6
        11 November 2024 16: 08
        Quote: spektr9
        Of course, but these zatrafeiny "sheds" are better suited for transporting personnel than the BTR-82 or the Matolyga, which is why they are used...

        It's better because it's more convenient. Yes, it's more comfortable. Otherwise, it's a disposable machine, for which there are no spare parts, ammunition, or repair base.
        1. +2
          11 November 2024 17: 16
          Quote: ian
          Otherwise, it is a disposable vehicle for which there are no spare parts, ammunition or repair base.

          Well done, they use the trophy rationally, if it breaks, they'll give it to a museum...
  2. 0
    11 November 2024 16: 10
    Quote: spektr9
    The soldier explained to you in the video... The armored personnel carrier is better.
    Or is your GOD Uncle SAM...then everything is clear?

    Sorry sun but between the stories of a hooray "patriot" like you and the technical characteristics, I choose the technical characteristics, you keep on hooraying
    You were told... that such posh goosenecks can only be driven on city roads... and shoot civilians... like the mattress makers did in Iraq... the filthy fascists.
    1. -1
      11 November 2024 19: 22
      Quote: Yaro Polk
      You were told... that such posh goosenecks can only be driven on city roads...

      Sir, get off your ass and watch the video and commentary from people who know a lot more about Bradley than "smart guys" like you.

      Telega, today, Two majors A clear example of the Bradley IFV's survivability

      Footage from the Kursk border region has appeared online, showing a Ukrainian Bradley IFV evacuating the wounded from a fortified area

      As a result, several ATGMs hit the vehicle, and a mine exploded nearby. Despite this, the armored vehicle continued moving, taking the personnel to the territory controlled by the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

      The Bradley is a very tough IFV that has demonstrated time and again that it saves the lives of its crews.

      ------
      There below, about our BTR82. That's why there are already about ten Bradleys running around in the army. There's plenty of ammunition for their gun, and their survivability is higher than that of cardboard parade vehicles. What's the problem with admitting this? We just need to make ours the same. That's all.
      1. -4
        12 November 2024 07: 42
        I say it again... ram them with TNT... and send them to the fascist trenches... somehow our army will manage without 10 of these vaunted nonsense... I hate this mattress-ridden liberal nonsense.
        1. +1
          12 November 2024 08: 08
          Quote: Yaro Polk
          I hate this mattress-sucking liberalism.

          You're looking in the wrong place, dear sir. You should hate those thieves in the army who, instead of new weapons and equipment, built palaces for themselves and wrote beautiful reports on the rearmament of the army. I'm as much of a mattress pad as you are a homosexual. You don't need to rip your vest off, in our time it's already funny and stupid, like a thug from the 60s. A new video from 07.11 is circulating on the Internet, including in the Russian Telegram. Unfortunately, apparently the same uneducable or narrow-minded person as you, with show-offs and hysteria, led a column of armored vehicles of the 810th Marine Regiment into a minefield and enemy flanking fire near the village of Pogrebki, Kursk Region. More than 20 BTR 82A were lost, many were killed and wounded, and this is the cream of our army, a rare few. You can find the video yourself. The only benefit from you is that you fight virtually, and not like that commander who killed many guys on the battlefield!
          1. +1
            12 November 2024 09: 55
            Quote: cmax
            led a column of armored vehicles from the 810th Marine Regiment into a minefield and enemy flanking fire near the village of Pogrebki, Kursk Region.

            This news is - fake. Some pro-Ukrainian channels distributed it along with a deepfake - a fake address by Vladimir Putin about the alleged withdrawal of troops from the territories of Crimea and the Kherson region.

            The Russian Defense Ministry confirmed that the Marines of the 810th Brigade stopped the advance of the Ukrainian Armed Forces column near Kursk. They eliminated militants from the Ukrainian company of the 82nd separate airborne assault brigade and nine units of enemy equipment, including Stryker and Kozak armored personnel carriers, and an HMMWV armored vehicle.
            1. 0
              12 November 2024 10: 21
              Quote: Nikolaevich I
              This news is fake. Some pro-Ukrainian channels spread it

              So watch the video, what's the problem? Fake or not? Do toy APCs explode there? Can't you tell the difference between a Stryker and an 82A? The Ministry of Defense hasn't confirmed anything about the cruiser Moskva yet. It sank. It's not about the loss (war), it's about how they allowed such losses at the end of the 3rd year of the war.
      2. 0
        12 November 2024 07: 44
        How many of them have already been destroyed... or do you not believe your eyes in the video archives?
  3. +7
    11 November 2024 16: 27
    Captured Hitler's armored vehicles were also actively used by our soldiers. That's right!
  4. -5
    11 November 2024 16: 27
    We don't have anything like that, so why not? Maybe someday we'll have a BMP that's not made of foil and cardboard.
    1. +3
      11 November 2024 16: 51
      Which of our BMPs are made of foil and cardboard? It looks like your head is made of cardboard.
      1. +1
        11 November 2024 16: 58
        Quote: Kurganets-45
        Which of our BMPs are made of foil and cardboard?

        Well, if you believe Ukrainian sources, which are the "most truthful", then everything we have is made of cardboard and foil. laughing
        1. +1
          11 November 2024 22: 51
          The downvoters either didn't understand what I wrote, or they themselves are representatives of the CIPSO, spreading nonsense that I laughed at.
      2. +1
        11 November 2024 20: 45
        19-20 mm of armor on the front of the BMP-1,2, by today's standards it's practically made of cardboard, and the BMP-3 isn't far behind, without dz the protection is now considered weak
      3. +1
        13 November 2024 11: 03
        bmp 2, bmp 3, of course not cardboard but made of steel, air and aluminum,
  5. -3
    11 November 2024 16: 30
    https://web.telegram.org/a/#-1001205641526 неплохо кстати птуры мина
  6. +1
    11 November 2024 16: 37
    Well, why not? They use captured tanks, grenade launchers, anti-tank guided missiles, machine guns...etc. Let the nonsense fight on the side of good!
  7. 0
    11 November 2024 16: 53
    Even during the Great Patriotic War, the Red Army used captured German equipment. Only, as a rule, it was equipped with some separate platoons and companies. I read the memoirs of a driver-mechanic who fought on a T-34-76, then on a Panther, and after that on a T-34-85. When an entire battalion was armed with Panthers, it was an eyesore in the brigade. Different speeds, different mileage between refueling, different fuel, different maintenance and repair. Different ammunition. Everyone breathed a sigh of relief when they were ordered to hand over the Panthers and receive brand new T-34-85s.
  8. 0
    11 November 2024 16: 54
    They cooperate, bk and spare parts Ukrainians regularly supplied.
  9. -2
    11 November 2024 17: 14
    Where are they going to get shells for this fool? Or will they just stick a 2A42 in there?
  10. +1
    11 November 2024 19: 30
    Well, this is a disgrace for the Russian defense industry; you can’t make weapons that are inconvenient for a soldier to use for landing.
  11. -1
    11 November 2024 23: 48
    My deep couch opinion.
    1 MTLB is a tractor/truck. In fact, it is a GAZ 66 on a gusli. That is, it is absolutely not suitable for combat. Especially in an attack. A ban on their use in attacks is necessary.
    2. BTR 60/70/80/ sell to the Papuans of Africa. That is, remove them from service and storage of the Russian Ministry of Defense, get rid of them completely. Temporarily supply BTR 87/88 (82M), until replaced by Boomerang.
    3. BMP1/2 to be converted into ambulances/evacuation vehicles. It is also possible to use them to increase the mobility of artillery.
    Install various guns and mortars on them instead of the standard turrets.
    4. Considering the number of T-64 tanks in our warehouses, I would suggest using the experience of the Jews. Namely, convert the hulls of these tanks into TBMPs. Remove the tank turret, install one from the BTR 82A, extend the sides, move the engine forward and replace it with ours. Hang additional armor, barbecues and alga. Once the T-64s run out, we can take on the first T-72s.
    But this should have been done 10 years ago(((
    1. +1
      12 November 2024 09: 50
      then the T62 will become an Israeli Merkava! weighing almost 70 tons! but with a troop compartment, if we can keep the weight within 42-44 tons then we will be successful.
      1. 0
        19 November 2024 23: 41
        It will work if there is Baikal or Berezhok instead of the tower.
    2. 0
      13 November 2024 13: 08
      Well, if there are no particular objections to the first and second proposals "from the couch", then to the others... they are both tedious to manufacture and unprofitable to operate.
      1. 0
        19 November 2024 23: 45
        p.3 I am sure that removing the turret from the BMP 1/2 and remaking the interior space for a stretcher with a place for a doctor is not a very labor-intensive task. There is nothing extremely complicated here.
        p.4 the Jews did convert tanks into heavy infantry fighting vehicles. Our engineers are no worse. And we don't need the Merkava, we need to transport infantry under protection. That is, a 57 mm cannon is enough.
  12. 0
    13 November 2024 13: 01
    Just like in the Middle Ages... both the 'horses' and 'knights' are clad in armour up to their ankles.
    1. 0
      19 November 2024 23: 46
      History is a cyclical thing, everything repeats itself. Only modern goodies are added)