Russian soldier presumed dead held occupied Ukrainian stronghold for three weeks alone

133
Russian soldier presumed dead held occupied Ukrainian stronghold for three weeks alone

There is always a place for a feat in war, sometimes soldiers, simply doing their job, commit it without thinking about it at all. The TG channel Mash reported on one such case that occurred during a special operation.

History occurred in one of the directions of the front, which one is not disclosed. The situation is normal - an assault group of the Russian Armed Forces attacked the enemy and managed to dislodge them from their occupied positions. In order to attack, they had to overcome minefields under fire from the Ukrainian artillery, while simultaneously fighting off attacks dronesBut they overcame it, got close to the enemy and drove him out of his position, taking control of the defensive line.



Ukrainian artillery hit the former Ukrainian Armed Forces positions occupied by our attack aircraft. Under heavy fire, our troops stopped communicating, and the command considered the group dead. But, as it turned out, one of the fighters managed to survive, and he single-handedly held this recaptured stronghold for three weeks, eating only a bow that he found at the Ukrainian Armed Forces positions.

As the resource writes, the Russian soldier was spotted by our intelligence when he was once again single-handedly fighting off an attack by Ukrainians. A decision was made to evacuate him, before that he drone dropped water and food. The fighter was pulled out to our people, after which he was immediately hospitalized. The hero turned out to be a 28-year-old native of Dagestan named Zakarya. At the moment, he is doing well, he is under the supervision of doctors.

133 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +66
    10 November 2024 10: 14
    Glory to such heroes of Russia!!!!!!! Deep bow!
    1. +73
      10 November 2024 10: 50
      A unique guy! But why do I immediately want to ask our guys in the SVO about communications? Didn't anyone in the group have an R/S with them... let's say it was damaged by an explosion. But he fought back for three weeks and no one in our strongholds saw this? And what about the slogan "don't abandon your own"? After all, all his friends, the stormtroopers of this stronghold, were lying dead next to him and there were no attempts from our side to take the bodies? "The squad didn't notice the loss of a fighter and Yablochko sang the song to the end...."
      Something is wrong here or not the whole truth of the war should be shown to the average person like me.
      1. +27
        10 November 2024 10: 58
        It's better not to ask about the connection, I would tell you, but I don't want to complicate my life. And the guy is a handsome man, in general, my respect for Dagestanis in particular has increased greatly! Respect guys, "Fly" from me personally has a special respect!
        1. +29
          10 November 2024 11: 19
          I have questions for both the author and the editors of this site. Do they themselves think about such obvious questions when they post an article on the site? After all, behind the heroism of one soldier, one can see the criminal negligence of the entire company or battalion where he serves. Or how can one explain that it took not three days, but THREE WEEKS?
          No, more information is definitely needed about this case.
          1. +17
            10 November 2024 15: 36
            Something is wrong here or not the whole truth of the war should be shown to the average person like me.
            It turns out that no one was going to pull out the guys who died there to hand over their bodies to their relatives am
            Excellent advertisement for caring about the fighters, "we don't abandon ours", yeah, keep lying that only xoxles don't take their own bodies am
            And give the guy a Hero star and a vacation
            1. +16
              10 November 2024 16: 02
              Regarding the bodies of the killed, there were situations when it was difficult to take even 300, and to take 200 sometimes you have to put them down three more times, so, will you go and take them?! That's why our armchair warriors know how it should be done, why it should be done, but no one does anything?
              Excuse me, have you ever had to pull out a 200th under mortar fire? Although, this is war, there are different cases, sometimes very unpleasant ones from your own people...!
              1. -6
                10 November 2024 20: 11

                That's why our couch warriors know how it should be done, why it should be done, but no one does anything?
                Excuse me, have you ever had to pull out a 200th under mortar fire? Although, this is war, there are different cases, sometimes very unpleasant ones from your own people...!


                Aren't you a couch warrior? No one pulls 200 out of the battlefield. But 021 is.
                1. +1
                  10 November 2024 21: 36
                  Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                  Aren't you a couch warrior? 200, no one pulls it out of the battlefield.

                  Don't disgrace yourself again. I've told you several times already, if you don't know anything, don't get involved with your reasoning. And here, not only are you chatting as you please, you're also calling the person a couch potato. That same couch gave you so much courage, it's too much impudence for an adequate person.
                  1. -5
                    10 November 2024 23: 20
                    Don't embarrass yourself again. I've told you several times already, if you don't have the knowledge, then don't get involved with the topic.


                    Well, don't interfere if you don't have the knowledge. Why are you so excited?
                    Is it news to you that the one killed is 021? And he will become the XNUMXth when he is sealed in zinc and loaded into a "black tulip". It happens.

                    And here, not only do you chatter as you please, you also call the person a couch potato. This very couch gave you such courage, too much impudence for an adequate person.


                    So you are the couch potatoes. What's wrong?
                    1. 0
                      10 November 2024 23: 46
                      Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                      So you are the couch potatoes. What's wrong?

                      "This is what gives me the spirit,
                      That I, absolutely without a fight,
                      I can get into big trouble."
                      Elephant and Pug
                      1. -4
                        10 November 2024 23: 55

                        "This is what gives me the spirit,
                        That I, absolutely without a fight,
                        I can get into big trouble."
                        Elephant and Pug


                        No, you won't get there. For that, you had to participate in real affairs. For example, like this.
              2. +8
                10 November 2024 21: 18
                That's why our couch warriors know how it should be done, why it should be done, but no one does anything?
                Please, as a real soldier, explain to me, the war of the couch, the logic of the moment. You send a group of fighters to take a stronghold, then the connection is lost, but within three weeks, in you No one shoots from this support, and only after THREE WEEKS, you send reconnaissance there!? Why not after three days?
                People above started spitting on our communications, I can understand them, but even the best communications in the world can be disrupted by a stray fragment, but here it turns out that the commanders did not see for three weeks, did not feel, I don’t know how else to describe it, that there was no fire on our positions from the enemy positions where the attack aircraft went. From my couch, I cannot understand what prevented me from feeling that something was going wrong.
                1. +4
                  10 November 2024 23: 08
                  This is war, our commander sent us to our death and did not even inquire whether any of us survived or not. We were written off alive, I do not know what is more here, stupidity, cowardice, or betrayal, but it is a fact. Cases are very different, really VERY different. So I fully admit the fact that everyone was considered dead, and the resistance itself may not have been noticed. Not every enemy stronghold that was taken was then occupied by our own troops, often they are simply bypassed. I tell you, ANYTHING CAN HAPPEN, and this is a given, and not a manifestation of some other factors.
            2. +1
              10 November 2024 16: 21
              In our neighboring settlement there is a woman who sells and transports milk. Her husband died at the beginning of this year. They could have pulled her out after four months on the front line.
            3. 0
              12 November 2024 08: 15
              There are so many dead and missing.
          2. +3
            10 November 2024 16: 43
            Quote: Saburov_Alexander53
            in fact, behind the heroism of one fighter, criminal negligence can be seen
            I apologize terribly, you apparently have no connection to the military world at all.
            Quote: 'In the forests near Vyazma' A. Tamonikov
            The heroism of some is the result of the betrayal or negligence of others
            Here's what a colleague answered
            Quote: Alex_1973
            It's better not to ask about the connection...
            - it's not for nothing that they arrested the chief of communications and are joking that The chief communications officer of the Armed Forces is DurovThey say there are departments where there is order, but mine were probably not lucky at all...
        2. +15
          10 November 2024 11: 30
          Quote: Alex_1973
          About connection

          And it's clear anyway. Not only do they intercept and immediately direct artillery, but also, based on mass, there is a choice between taking a second b.k. or a radio station with a "black mark".
          But the most important thing for us, as always, is mediocrity and the stupidity of the command was compensated by the mass heroism of ordinary soldiers.
          The most important thing is that we have been at war for a year now, there are thousands of examples of how you can't put idiots who forget about their people in command positions, but nothing changes. Is it really that hard to create an analytical department at headquarters or counterintelligence that is independent of commanders to analyze the competence of decisions made? I'm not even talking about the dozens of programs that mathematically model the tactical situation.
        3. +4
          10 November 2024 13: 02
          Quote: Alex_1973
          It's better not to ask about the connection.

          Alexey, hello! Well, there are different situations. You are right about all sorts of baofengs, there is no point in talking about them here. But we had a situation during the assault when the guys found themselves in a similar situation, the commander cut off the forward group with fire, the squad commander got in touch, said goodbye and said that he was breaking the radio, since it was unknown how long it would hold out, it could fall into enemy hands. They write here why they didn’t help, but it’s not that simple. We tried to pull them out for 2 days, but we couldn’t, the company commander even participated, he was wounded. So there can be many options.
          1. +2
            10 November 2024 13: 31
            We tried to get them out for 2 days, but we couldn’t, the company commander even participated,

            Even the company commander? Why didn't this company commander inform the battalion commander, and he didn't organize support with the battalion's firepower?
            Why did you sacrifice the department, why didn't you protect the department's advancement from being cut off? You should have kept quiet.
            1. +11
              10 November 2024 13: 45
              Everyone who needed to was informed. We had a small assault detachment, back then they sent anyone they could, they were there only at their own request, so there were few people. The only place where your comment can be called reasonable is about the fire capabilities. Back then, even Prigozhin began not to speak out with his words about the shell shortage.
              Quote: Konnick
              Why did you sacrifice the department, why didn't you protect the department's advancement from being cut off? You should have kept quiet.

              What makes you think that they sacrificed, were you there? You made it up yourself, and you shut your mouth, you'd better keep quiet if you don't know what and how it was. Did virtual stars raise your self-esteem so much? There are many of you in the VO, only a few were in the SVO, but armchair generals know better than anyone how to fight.
              1. -9
                10 November 2024 13: 54
                There were only a few of you in the Military District, and only a few in the Northern Military District, but armchair generals know better than anyone how to fight.

                Judging by your comment, they know better...since they were trained and served in Soviet times.
                1. +7
                  10 November 2024 14: 05
                  Quote: Konnick
                  were trained back in Soviet times

                  Is that all you can say? You came up with an excuse in the form of a Soviet education, is that now an indulgence? According to this logic, Shoigu can also be justified, what claims can be made against him, he knows better, he has a Soviet education.
                  1. +8
                    10 November 2024 14: 52
                    Quote: suhorukofal
                    Shoigu can be justified, what claims can be made against him, he knows better, he has a Soviet education.

                    Did Shoigu have any military education at all?
                    1. +5
                      10 November 2024 15: 57
                      Did Shoigu have any military education at all?

                      He was a builder, didn't even serve in the army. There are many who were projected to become generals, like Zolotov.
                2. -1
                  10 November 2024 15: 42
                  Konnick (Nikolay)
                  Judging by your comment, they know better...since they were trained and served in Soviet times.

                  Well, if that's the case, then you're probably a ready-made Chief of the General Staff?! My colleague and I are also wondering, have you ever been in a real fight?!
                  1. -2
                    10 November 2024 17: 10
                    My colleague and I are also wondering, have you ever been in a real fight?!

                    What do you call a real fight? Hand-to-hand combat or sitting in a trench? Or running through a minefield?
                    1. +3
                      10 November 2024 17: 14
                      Any choice for you... Do you want to sit in a trench under Baba Yaga, but not walk on a mine? You certainly haven't done that, have you?!
                      1. -2
                        10 November 2024 17: 21
                        Any choice for you... Do you want to sit in a trench under Baba Yaga, but not walk on a mine? You certainly haven't done that, have you?!

                        It's good that they didn't suggest eating onions for three weeks
                      2. +1
                        10 November 2024 17: 25
                        You know, I didn’t eat onions, but three days without water, yes, you can live without food, but without water, just try it...
          2. +3
            10 November 2024 15: 38
            Lyosha, well, I don't need to tell you what it's like in battle. Communication, both ours and theirs (maybe a little better) you know what it's like. He's just a handsome guy. My guys, who left after my evacuation, left complete encirclement right through a minefield, they got it bad, BUT they came out handsome!
          3. +5
            10 November 2024 16: 49
            Quote: suhorukofal
            Well, there are different situations.

            Indeed, no one is insured against accidents. But your case, like the one described above, is far from the first. Literally a week ago, a neighbor left for the SVO from vacation, he also told a similar story, only in a much worse, corrupt and selfish interpretation.
            Therefore, inexorable statistics say that all this is far from accidental.
            1. +3
              10 November 2024 17: 16
              There is such a concept, and it has been around for a long time, that for some it’s war, and for others it’s their own mother!
            2. +4
              10 November 2024 17: 32
              Quote: Vitaly_pvo
              your case, like the one described above, is far from the first

              Everything is correct, anything can happen, there are many unpleasant situations. I believe your neighbor's words. I find something else unpleasant in this topic, the conversation about a person's feat, but some people can't sit quietly unless they say something bad about our army. It turns out that everything is bad - there is no connection, we are abandoning our own, intelligence is blind, if there is a feat, that is already bad. As if a landing party from Ukraine landed, and shares its opinion about the Russian Armed Forces
      2. +8
        10 November 2024 11: 26
        ...I also don't understand the command's attitude...
        If 2 groups were sent and the sergeant died, then the platoon commander (lieutenant), having reported to the top, had to undertake the evacuation himself...
        Something is wrong in ... the Danish state
        1. +6
          10 November 2024 15: 48
          You are completely unaware of volunteer units. There are no sergeants, dressers, squad leaders, platoon commanders, etc. There are senior group leaders who are often brought up out of thin air and often have no combat experience. Everything is rather arbitrary, it is what it is, there is no other option yet. This is of course bad, I completely disagree with this, but who asked me or you? Therefore, we fight as best we can, but at least we fight, and do not throw manure on the Internet...
          1. -2
            11 November 2024 06: 11
            ...no, I don't know. Are you saying that a guy from a beer stand was given a machine gun and sent into battle? You yourself understood what you were writing.
      3. +5
        10 November 2024 11: 28
        It is rightly said - "The heroism of some is always a consequence of the sloppiness of others." Only sometimes it is not sloppiness, but much worse...
        1. +9
          10 November 2024 13: 08
          Quote: Bulrumeb
          The heroism of some is always consequence of the sloppiness of others

          A completely stupid saying. It's not always like that. Judging by it, there can't be heroes with a good commander, he must definitely be a slob. That is, no matter how you look at it, a hero is bad.
          1. +6
            10 November 2024 17: 17
            It's bad that the fighter fought alone for THREE weeks without any help. That is, they sent fighters to storm and forgot about them. There was news recently that two of our guys were in the basement, alone, fighting for a week, also without any help. And for me, that's bad.
            1. +1
              10 November 2024 17: 47
              Quote: Bulrumeb
              i.e. they sent fighters to storm and forgot about them.

              Where did such speculations come from that they forgot? The article says that the group stopped communicating. Of course, this is bad, but not everything happens the way you want it to, this also applies to information, it is unknown who is alive and where, where help is needed, and where it is already too late.
              1. +3
                10 November 2024 21: 04
                But the group was sent to the defensive midfield.
                Therefore, there was an order to storm.
                Therefore, this stronghold was in some plans - now we will capture this object, tomorrow the next one, or we will capture this object and the enemy will begin to transfer forces.
                And so it turns out, or
                A) the fighters need to be removed, they are too smart. That is, storming the strongpoint is a local decision - well, he didn't like the fighters for some reason, so he sent them to their death. And it is clear why the fighter fought there alone for three weeks...
                B) Well, it didn’t work out according to plans to capture the defensive midfielder, well, to hell with it.
                B) Well, they managed to capture it and everyone died - that's not bad either
                Although (option B) here the question arises - were the enemy's countermeasures not provided for? Where is our artillery/aviation/UAV that would have had time to suppress the enemy's heavy fire?
                1. +1
                  10 November 2024 21: 20
                  all these A, B, C are purely guesses. Is there at least one confirmation of these words? If there is, then we will talk about this topic, and on the basis of assumptions one can build theories for a long time.
                  Quote: Sergey Zhikharev
                  Where is our artillery/aircraft/UAVs that would have time to suppress the enemy’s heavy fire?

                  The fire is not suppressed by a wave of a magic wand. This is a war, the enemy also resists, and does not wait to be destroyed. As I said, it is unknown what actually happened there. If everything was so bad, then the man would not have been saved. So far, all such thoughts are a pure throw-in in the spirit of "look how bad everything is."
                  1. 0
                    11 November 2024 09: 36
                    I just have possible scenarios: the fighters were sent to storm a strongpoint, it (after capture) was covered by enemy fire, and for two weeks (if we assume that they tried to pull the fighter out for another week) there was no business with the strongpoint. And this "all quiet on the front" became known thanks to the heroism of a fighter. And how many situations can there be when a group was sent, they died and there was no noise?
                    And the main question: what is being done to ensure that such situations (they sent a group and forgot) happen as an exception?
                    1. 0
                      11 November 2024 10: 26
                      Quote: Sergey Zhikharev
                      What is being done to ensure that situations like this (sent a group and forgot) happen as an exception?

                      Please read the article again:
                      Under heavy fire, our troops stopped communicating, and the command considered the group dead.

                      What to do? Probably, you need to read the article more carefully, then there will be no such questions. The man was not abandoned, as soon as he was discovered, they started evacuating.
                      1. 0
                        11 November 2024 19: 27
                        What to do? Probably, you need to read the article more carefully, then there will be no such questions. The man was not abandoned, as soon as he was discovered, they started evacuating.

                        So I wrote that even though no one paid attention for two weeks, they pulled him out on the third week; i.e. they tried to pull him out for a week, but couldn't. Although the news is that they considered him dead for exactly three weeks.
                        If I send fighters to storm a certain point, then I must take into account the following actions of the enemy
                        1. He will simply move to a new line of defense (let's assume that the defensive midfielder is not that important, or is already in an unsuccessful position of the front)
                        2. The opponent will try to contract and recapture the defensive midfield. Consequently, he will begin to concentrate his forces (or he already has a reserve for such a case)
                        3 will open massive fire on the stronghold - so don't let anyone get you. It can't be repulsed, but it can't be left intact either.
                        Therefore, in the 2nd and 3rd options, I must keep artillery/aircraft/assault drones ready, which will not allow the enemy to counterattack or shoot with impunity.
                        At the same time, I should have a reserve in case of success (if option 1) or at least to pull out the fighters sent to the assault if something went wrong.
                        Yes, I don’t know what happened there, but judging by the news, the picture is not happy: from the negligence of the command (in the 2nd year of the war) to the sending of units to slaughter.
              2. 0
                11 November 2024 04: 02
                Quote: suhorukofal
                Not everything happens the way you want it to, this also applies to information, it is unknown who is alive and where, where you need help, and where it is already too late.
                With all due respect to your vision of this situation, but cognitive dissonance arises when receiving information similar to that presented in the article and looking at official sources - everything is fine with them, it’s good that not everyone is doing well, they are slowly putting people in jail.
                But if we turn to experience sworn partners - They do pull out their own, well, at least they try. For that same blockhead O'Grady in Yugoslavia they sent a team of two Stellars, two Cobras, a couple of Harriers and there was also an AWACS on standby. The colonel who led this horde said that O'Grady was a blockhead, but he didn't refuse the general wink He told me a good joke later.
                1. +2
                  11 November 2024 04: 31
                  Everything is correct, it is necessary to save in this situation and they did. Yes, not right away, but the thing is that they started taking measures when he was found as a fighter on the support before it is written in the article:
                  the command considered the group dead


                  in Yugoslavia they sent a team of two Stellars, two Cobras, a couple of Harriers and there was also an AWACS on standby. The colonel who led this horde said that O'Grady was a blockhead, but he did not refuse the general

                  The fact that such a group was assembled is correct. And the commander was right to say that we need to help out. But such an opportunity is not always available, such forces are available. And the enemy does not calmly watch all this from the sidelines.

                  And what kind of joke was that?
                  1. 0
                    11 November 2024 12: 17
                    Quote: suhorukofal
                    That such a group was assembled is right. And the commander was right to say that we need to help out.
                    У sworn partners the CSAR aka Combat Search and Rescue methodology has been well developed: from control to forces and means. In this example, these are the Marines, they are pressing hard. To be fair, one respected Service let it slip, probably by accident feel , that the Serbs unwound two similar missions, having caught them on landing.
                    the command considered the group dead
                    Sorry, I can't accept this. I understand, but...
                    1. +1
                      11 November 2024 12: 18
                      Quote: suhorukofal
                      What kind of joke was that?

                      The savages caught the general, the major and the soldier and said: - According to our traditions, we without a doubt condemn you to execution. But again, according to traditions, we will fulfill any of your wishes.
                      The major thought and since there was nothing else to do: - I want a table with the best food and drinks, a beautiful woman for company and time until the morning. Well, that's very clear, and in the morning he was executed.
                      The general thought: - I want to make a speech, I want a thousand, two thousand, all the people living in this area to listen to me. - Well, it seems to us a little strange desire, but it will be done as you ask.
                      The soldier heard this and asked: - Carry out my sentence before the general begins...
      4. -3
        10 November 2024 11: 30
        Quote: Saburov_Alexander53
        and there are no attempts on our part to take away the bodies

        It was logical to assume that the enemy had returned to their positions, and to send in an assault to recapture the dead bodies... It was possible, of course, but...
        1. +6
          10 November 2024 11: 39
          It was logical to assume,
          Dart2027. So you have only assumptions about how this could have happened... That is why I emphasize that the author and the editors, before publishing such articles, should think carefully about the obvious questions that will arise in readers from the very first lines... And to which there are no answers yet and, what is worse, cause a backlash against the actions of the commanders who allowed this to happen.
          After all, if he was shooting back alone for three weeks, that means the Ukrainians were hitting him with everything they had... And our guys were watching this "movie" and waiting for him to be finished off? After all, that is the conclusion that comes from this article...
          1. +3
            10 November 2024 11: 44
            Quote: Saburov_Alexander53
            After all, if he was shooting back alone for three weeks, that means the Ukrainians were hitting him with everything they had... And our people were watching this "movie" and waiting for him to be finished off?

            Now that's another question. If they had hit him with heavy weapons, our guys would have noticed it right away, but he wouldn't have survived. I'll assume again - the enemy didn't use artillery so that our guys wouldn't realize that they hadn't recaptured the stronghold, and it's not that easy to spot riflemen.
        2. +8
          10 November 2024 12: 35
          Did it ever occur to you to send a copter the next day to inspect the position? A lot would have been clearer.
          1. +2
            10 November 2024 12: 48
            Quote: Xenofont
            Did it ever occur to you to send a copter the next day to inspect the position?
            Apparently not.
          2. 0
            10 November 2024 15: 51
            Do you have this copter to send it out?! I am amazed by the confidence of some that the unit commander has the same capabilities as a general.
        3. +5
          10 November 2024 13: 21
          You are absolutely right. I already wrote that we had a similar situation. It is easy for people to be smart about why they couldn't beat us, as if everything was so simple. We tried, even the company commander was 300, he himself ran to us to lead. How lucky he was, he was always lucky, but even he was hurt then. I am sick of this whining, the man is a hero, and people are still looking for someone to blame. It is necessary to add rottenness.
          1. -3
            10 November 2024 13: 36
            Quote: suhorukofal
            I'm sick of this whining, the man is a hero, but people are still looking for someone to blame. It's necessary to add some rottenness.

            Haven't read "Myths about Russia"? I don't agree with Medinsky on everything, but he is right about the main thing:
            Finding among the Russians the most mysterious negative qualities, including patience and a love of cruelty and violence, our enemies looked at the quality that we really have - cultural-historical masochism.
            1. 0
              10 November 2024 13: 49
              I start to get nervous when I hear the name Meditsinsky, I don’t think I’ll be able to calmly read her works
              And here, whoever writes all sorts of dirt, I think is not quite Russian. Pig snouts are sticking out without hiding. How the site was dropped is a telling moment, what attention is paid to the site.
              1. 0
                10 November 2024 14: 28
                Quote: suhorukofal
                And here, whoever writes all this dirt, I think, is not quite Russian.

                Unfortunately, it is not a fact. We have enough of our own, and not traitors, but simply...
                1. +4
                  10 November 2024 14: 36
                  That's right, I remembered a relative like that. In his dislike of Putin, he was on the side of the Ukrops. He says that if we lose, nothing will change. And there are people like that on VO. I already go to some Ukro-resources to relax. While here they shed tears about how bad everything is, there they say how bad the Russians are, they keep pushing forward, they killed so many people. Like in the joke about the Jew:
                  - Rabinovich! You read anti-Semitic newspapers!
                  - At first I read Jewish newspapers. There is such depression there! Everyone wants to exterminate the Jews, there is anti-Semitism, oppression, problems all around, everyone is crying... I literally couldn't sleep! And now I read the anti-Semitic press - and what do you think? Totally positive! The Jews rule the world, they have captured everything, they are the richest, they decide everything everywhere!
                  1. +1
                    10 November 2024 15: 19
                    Quote: suhorukofal
                    Like in the joke about the Jew

                    I also remember him sometimes.
          2. +7
            10 November 2024 14: 00
            suhorukofal(Alexey), I don't have a single complaint about the commanders of this fighter, until I know all the circumstances of this case. But my complaints are about the author of the article and the editors.... feel the difference!!!
            Thanks to their article, which is not thought through in detail, the wrong associations arise with the command of this fighter. From the text of the article it is completely impossible to understand how it happened that not three days, but THREE WEEKS...
            We already know several examples of how individual guys got out of deep encirclement in the Kharkov region in 2022, when the front fell back tens of kilometers. But they went there at night and secretly, and here they write that he alone shot back and held the stronghold for three weeks and did not even try to reach his own. Why? Was he waiting for an order to retreat or waiting for reinforcements? That's what should have been written, which would have removed many questions, and not about three weeks of eating only onions... And he is not one of those who remained encircled, and if you believe the article, he was part of the assault group of the enemy stronghold, i.e. during our offensive...
            How far was this stronghold from his own? Maybe 10 or more kilometers, or in a dense forest, where it is not clear that a fighter remained there and continues to fight.... It is clear that he was hiding from any drones, try to figure out whose that is in the sky... But in the end he came out and began waving his arms to his own... The author did not indicate any of this for understanding, but it was worth it....
            1. +9
              10 November 2024 14: 20
              Quote: Saburov_Alexander53
              And my complaints are against the author of the article and the editors.

              I completely agree with you here. I read in other sources that they advanced far ahead, passed through minefields, were covered by fire and were not supported because they stopped communicating. Everything is clear here.
              Here are the words from Rogozin's tweet
              A few days later, our scouts saw from a drone that when the enemy tried to retake the stronghold, the lifeless trenches suddenly came to life and began to snap back with automatic fire.

              There is no talk about 3 weeks here, it seems someone decided to embellish it. I am very confused by the words about 3 weeks on the bow
              Quote: Saburov_Alexander53
              The author did not indicate any of this for understanding, but it was worth it....

              That's all right! You have to search the internet for the rest of the details yourself, then it looks a little different.
              Quote: Saburov_Alexander53
              Were you waiting for the order to retreat or were you waiting for reinforcements?

              Here my guess is that the assault group did not know the area, perhaps there was a guide, or the map was only on gadgets, respectively the fighter did not know where to go, there were minefields around. Again, these are my guesses. But you are right, the article is written terribly.
              1. 0
                10 November 2024 21: 51
                Here are the words from Rogozin's tweet

                Excuse me, but how does Rogozin know all this?
            2. 0
              11 November 2024 15: 14
              And here is where the most interesting part begins, the author of the article is not there,
              and some readers are already ready to "put up a wall...".
              I would leave such articles (without an author) without comments.
          3. -1
            10 November 2024 16: 10
            I'm sick of this whining, the man is a hero, but people are still looking for someone to blame. It's necessary to add some rottenness.

            I agree with you, the guy is undoubtedly a hero, three weeks alone among the bodies of enemies and comrades. But the article was clearly written by the author to, as you put it, add "rotten ones" and he achieved this. You lead the majority express their indignation about what happened. Maybe the author is not aware of the situation, he just heard it somewhere and went to "write" an article.
            1. +3
              10 November 2024 17: 41
              Quote: private person
              Maybe the author is not aware of the situation, he just heard it somewhere and went off to write an article.

              It can't, but that's how it is. Several have a different description, describing the circumstances in more detail. Someone didn't bother to read them and quickly posted them.
      5. +4
        10 November 2024 12: 07
        Quote: Saburov_Alexander53
        Something is wrong here or not the whole truth of the war should be shown to the average person like me.

        The day before yesterday I wrote about not the whole truth, the patriots really don't like it, they downvoted it. It's better to keep quiet and not write.
      6. +4
        10 November 2024 13: 07
        Something is wrong here or not the whole truth of the war should be shown to the average person like me.

        You are absolutely right.
        This is some kind of crazy nonsense.
        Warrior Hero! That's undeniable.
        Where were the fathers-commanders? Where are our drones hanging 24/7, continuously monitoring the situation?
        This is not a war, but some kind of parallel universe. In general, there are no words.
    2. +2
      10 November 2024 11: 10
      Quote from Ella34
      Glory to such heroes of Russia!!!!!!! Deep bow!

      And one warrior in the field:
      If it is tailored in Russian style. soldier
      For Eurofascists, all Russians, regardless of nationality, are Russians.
    3. +10
      10 November 2024 11: 21
      A star, definitely, for this son of Dagestan.
      1. +5
        10 November 2024 12: 06
        Quote: Sevastiec
        A star, definitely, for this son of Dagestan.

        Support!

        They completed the combat mission! He was the only one left alive! And he didn't go crazy - and in no way betrayed the merits, conscience and honor of his fallen comrades!
        At the same time, he did not chicken out, did not run away from his position - and for 3 weeks, all alone, he held this combat position captured by our military!
        He also did not allow the enemies to get to the bodies of his fallen comrades, and protected their bodies from being desecrated by the enemy.

        Once again, I unequivocally support awarding him the title of Hero of Russia!
    4. Maz
      -1
      10 November 2024 13: 24
      Let me remind you that Heroism in war is a consequence of someone's betrayal, bungling and team stupidity, even deliberate sabotage. So I see no reason to rejoice. The soldier is certainly a hero who survived and did not surrender. But his superiors are bastards and scoundrels. It's a pity that the number of such cases still does not decrease. And the fact that our soldiers are the best in the world is not news, it's a tradition.
  2. +27
    10 November 2024 10: 17
    Real, not club Hero of Russia!
  3. +22
    10 November 2024 10: 21
    Deep bow to him and his parents for a worthy son.
  4. +16
    10 November 2024 10: 21
    The hero turned out to be a 28-year-old native of Dagestan named Zakarya.
    Parents raised this Hero correctly! Respect and deep bow to Zakariy's parents, as well as to the Hero himself, health and long life! soldier
  5. +18
    10 November 2024 10: 25
    Another Hero from Dagestan. But this time, thank God, he survived. Magomed Nurbagandov is no longer with us, but his just cause lives on. Work, brothers!
  6. +18
    10 November 2024 10: 31
    Under heavy fire, our men stopped communicating, and the command considered the group dead. But, as it turned out, one of the fighters managed to survive, and he single-handedly held this recaptured stronghold for three weeks

    It turns out that our command didn't really need this stronghold if they didn't pay attention to the continuation of the battle for three weeks!!! or they didn't report something in the news...
    1. +14
      10 November 2024 10: 49
      It turns out that our command didn’t really need this stronghold if they were three weeks old!!

      And the support is not needed and as it turned out, the attack aircraft died for the "wants" of the commanders. And what about the words of the commander-in-chief himself? We do not abandon our own!!! Just think, they sent us to storm and for three weeks no one bothered to find out the result of the storm.
      1. +3
        10 November 2024 10: 51
        We don't abandon our own. Yes. So these people are not our own for the management.
        1. -2
          10 November 2024 10: 55
          We don't abandon our own. Yes. So these people are not our own for the management.

          And then posters appear wherever they can be pasted: “Contract service from 4,5 million per year.”
          1. +5
            10 November 2024 11: 25
            you have 4.5
            we have 1.3
            I still have to survive this year
            1. -1
              10 November 2024 13: 46
              you have 4.5
              we have 1.3
              I still have to survive this year

              That's what I mean. Even 10 in the "other world" are not needed and it's not a fact that relatives will receive them with such an attitude towards the soldiers. They will be listed as missing and that's it.
      2. +2
        10 November 2024 11: 35
        Quote: private person
        It turns out that our command didn't really need this stronghold.

        Perhaps it was some kind of reconnaissance in force. If we manage to advance, then we will consolidate and continue to advance; if we don't, then we will try somewhere else. If I'm not mistaken, six months ago the Ukrainian Armed Forces began to complain that our forces were attacking in small groups in many places at once, pulling their forces apart and eventually finding a weak spot.
        1. +2
          10 November 2024 11: 45
          Perhaps it was a kind of reconnaissance in force. If we manage to advance, then we will consolidate and continue to advance; if not, then we will try somewhere else.

          Reminded me of an episode from the film "Na Voina Ka Voina" (Na Voina, Na Voina), a tank attack failed, several tanks were destroyed, but Maleshkin's self-propelled gun got through and Colonel Dey concludes... there are no mines there... i.e. he sent his tank crews... I won't continue.
          With such reconnaissance in force we will be left without people.
          Study the documents and find information on the Internet about the reconnaissance in force of the 28th OSHR (separate penal company) of the Leningrad Front under the command of Major Lesik....they were trained for reconnaissance in force for a month!!!
          1. +3
            10 November 2024 11: 48
            Quote: Konnick
            Reminded me of an episode from the movie "Na Voina Ka Na Voina"

            Unfortunately, it is precisely in war that it is war. Similar cases have been and will be.
      3. +3
        10 November 2024 12: 11
        Quote: private person
        We don't abandon our own!!!

        Let the brigade commander, call sign "Kashtan", answer this when his wounded soldiers asked for help for five days.
  7. +10
    10 November 2024 10: 34
    Ukrainian artillery hit the former Ukrainian Armed Forces positions occupied by our attack aircraft. Under heavy fire, our troops stopped communicating, and the command considered the group dead. But, as it turned out, one of the fighters managed to survive, and he single-handedly held this recaptured stronghold for three weeks, eating only a bow that he found at the Ukrainian Armed Forces positions.

    what a disregard for soldiers, a group disappeared so they went to search, at least drones to find out what's going on, and in general the way we organize the support of assaults is disgusting in my opinion, without counter-battery combat, without reconnaissance, just yesterday I watched on YouTube how the VSU dismantled our armored personnel carrier with an assault group from a tank under the bridge.
    Of course, the soldier from Dagestan deserves great respect for his dedication and disdain for difficulties, but there are questions for those who sent him to storm the city; people were essentially abandoned and forgotten
    1. +6
      10 November 2024 11: 03
      [quote]Just yesterday I watched on YouTube how the VSU dismantled our armored personnel carrier with an assault group from a tank under a bridge./quote]
      That's why YouTube is blocked
      1. +2
        10 November 2024 11: 24
        [quote=urik62][quote]just yesterday I watched on YouTube how the VSU dismantled our armored personnel carrier with an assault group from a tank under a bridge./quote]
        That's why YouTube is blocked[/quote] Unfortunately, there are plenty of such videos without YouTube. There are some on Telegram. And there are many questions for our middle and senior command. I feel sorry for the guys...
    2. +1
      10 November 2024 12: 14
      Quote: Graz
      but there are questions for those who sent him to storm, people were essentially abandoned and forgotten

      And how long ago did we read about how the battalion commander sent two drone operators into a meat assault and they died. Now there's silence, is the battalion commander punished, or was he awarded and promoted?
  8. +9
    10 November 2024 10: 40
    The situation is normal - an assault group of the Russian Armed Forces attacked the enemy and managed to dislodge them from their occupied positions
    .

    Ukrainian artillery hit the former positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces occupied by our attack aircraft. Under heavy fire, our troops stopped communicating, the command considered the group dead

    And what is so ordinary about the situation, that they allowed the assault group to be shot at without supporting it with fire...?
    How long will we cover up our failures and losses with feats???
    1. +2
      10 November 2024 11: 00
      It has always been like this in our history and it is. It will probably be like this, "we will cover up failures and losses with feats." Russia has been holding on to guys like these for over 1000 years, and these are not just pretty words - they are facts.
  9. +5
    10 November 2024 10: 40
    The story took place on one of the front lines, but it is not disclosed which one.
    which is not surprising, given the command’s swinish attitude towards its subordinates.
  10. +10
    10 November 2024 10: 40
    One can imagine the losses if an entire assault group was simply written off, without any investigation or search. This fever is not a war. Some kind of village dump, wall to wall.
    1. +7
      10 November 2024 10: 47
      One can imagine the losses if an entire assault group was simply written off, without any investigation or search. This fever is not a war. Some kind of village dump, wall to wall

      This news made me furious...for those who throw caps in the air...but if you analyze it, everything is very bad
      1. -2
        10 November 2024 10: 56
        You are right. And these "very" are countless, unfortunately.
      2. +4
        10 November 2024 10: 57
        And the beginning of the story is no better - they stormed and held the defensive line without any support. As if they were sentenced in advance.
  11. +6
    10 November 2024 10: 43
    A hundred years to this guy!!! Bow to his parents!
    1. +7
      10 November 2024 10: 57
      A hundred years to this guy!!! Bow to his parents!

      And send those who sent this assault group to their death to storm the stronghold
      1. +6
        10 November 2024 11: 04
        Quote: Konnick
        A hundred years to this guy!!! Bow to his parents!

        And send those who sent this assault group to their death to storm the stronghold

        There is something to hold them accountable for, I agree. At least for the fact that for 3 weeks they did not take measures to pull out the bodies of the dead. Then Zakarya would have been discovered earlier.
      2. +3
        10 November 2024 11: 06
        Let's hope the guy recovers and returns home. What will he think about this? What will others think and say, both people and nationalities. And what if he suddenly doesn't get any certificates or payments... How much they write about illegal extortions from SVO participants. It's like
        1. +6
          10 November 2024 11: 12
          Let's hope the guy gets better and returns home.

          And I will hope that this whole story was made up by short-sighted propagandists...
          You can't fight like this, you can't ignore the assault group for three weeks, you can't cover up this military crime with a feat, you can't leave the commanders who didn't organize this assault properly unpunished...
          1. +2
            10 November 2024 13: 46
            composed by narrow-minded propagandists

            Yes, that would be the best, but if so, it could have unpleasant consequences for the narrow-minded.
  12. -1
    10 November 2024 10: 51
    Nails should be made out of these people! And what about intelligence and communications?!
  13. +15
    10 November 2024 11: 01
    I salute. Russian soldiers are well known in Germany for their courage and readiness to stand firm in difficult situations.
    Former West German officer
    1. +3
      10 November 2024 11: 32
      come to the Russian army
      We have a lot of German heroes
      1. +1
        13 November 2024 22: 56
        Greetings!
        I was on a contact trip to Moscow, Kaluga and Tula with a group of other Germans in May. I really enjoyed it.
        However, I am too old to participate in such a special operation and would probably be much more valuable and profitable in my current civilian job as a management consultant.
        But I have a family and a little daughter, and I want to accompany her as long as possible on her young life path - at school and then at university.
        Therefore, I cannot contribute directly, except for occasional financial donations.
        I hope that Russia will continue to develop and that Russian women will have more children again. The most important thing is to have well-educated children.
        Otherwise you will win the special operation and be left without a population.
        I pray for Russian soldiers and militias in the new (old) regions.
      2. +1
        14 November 2024 03: 00
        Greetings!
        I was on a contact trip to Moscow, Kaluga and Tula with a group of other Germans in May. I really enjoyed it.
        However, I am too old to participate in such a special operation and would probably be much more valuable and profitable in my current civilian job as a management consultant.
        But I have a family and a little daughter, and I want to accompany her as long as possible on her young life path - at school and then at university.
        Therefore, I cannot contribute directly, except for occasional financial donations.
        I hope that Russia will continue to develop and that Russian women will have more children again. The most important thing is to have well-educated children.
        Otherwise you will win the special operation and be left without a population.
        I pray for Russian soldiers and militias in the new (old) regions.
    2. 0
      21 November 2024 18: 06
      Quote from Harold
      Russian soldiers are widely known in Germany for their courage and willingness to stand firm in difficult situations.

      It’s a paradox, but German soldiers distinguished themselves with the same resilience, which is why this war was the hardest in human history.
      With respect!
  14. +3
    10 November 2024 11: 14
    And one in the field is a warrior. A REAL WARRIOR!
  15. +3
    10 November 2024 11: 15
    The heroism of some is a consequence of the betrayal or negligence of others.
    1. -4
      10 November 2024 11: 35
      what can you do now
      We'll still exterminate the potbellies am
  16. +4
    10 November 2024 11: 29
    A hero, I'm not afraid to say a Russian Dagestani, well done!
  17. 0
    10 November 2024 12: 21
    What has the command come to... Like in the joke: "on the 3rd day, Keen Eye saw that the barn where we were locked up had one wall missing..." Or did they send UAV operators or Dagestanis to storm it, and then, the grass won't grow?
  18. +4
    10 November 2024 12: 59
    The article MUST have a continuation (clarification), otherwise people will not understand!!!
  19. +3
    10 November 2024 15: 43
    "...he held this recaptured stronghold for three weeks alone..." He didn't give up. He didn't run away. He held it alone! A hero! A deep bow to the warrior!
  20. +1
    10 November 2024 16: 32
    In war there is alwaysthere is a place for heroism, sometimes fighters, just doing their job, they do it without thinking about it at all.

    so these are the unsung heroes, the heroes of every day
  21. -2
    10 November 2024 17: 24
    The guy is definitely a hero. But I don't understand why they decided to evacuate him instead of sending reinforcements. So all the heroism was in vain? The defensive midfielder that the guy was holding was finally given up?
  22. 0
    10 November 2024 20: 10
    Zakarya - I invite you to visit the Tver region, I will be glad to see a hero on our land.
  23. 0
    10 November 2024 20: 14
    Am I being asked to believe this?
  24. 0
    10 November 2024 21: 11
    I hope this hero will be fine, glory to our fighters...
  25. +1
    10 November 2024 21: 31
    In 1986, at one of the mountain checkpoints, a soldier got appendicitis. He had to be evacuated, but how? Damn the weather, clouds are scuttling across the peaks.
    We contacted them directly via communications, how are things going there, are they really tight or what?
    They said that there are gaps (windows). And it seems that they are not pinned down at all, you can go down the slope.
    Well, off we go, this time inside out, with the Mi-24 in front as a weather reconnaissance aircraft. And the Mi-8 behind it.
    The boys weren't lying, the window was found.
    In short, they took the soldier. Just six officers (two crews), played a little slalom.
    And how could it be otherwise? That’s what the Soviet army stood for.
    I carried my camera with me everywhere back then, it's a pity customs didn't let everything through. But one frame from that flight has been preserved.
    1. +1
      10 November 2024 23: 26
      In 1988, we left Cienfuegos abeam Miami, a sailor had appendicitis. It took almost a day to get to Havana. A military doctor, a senior lieutenant, assistants, a dental technician, and a veterinary paramedic operated. We were 5 hours short of Havana. Everything went fine, we went to carry out a combat mission. A small episode. Yes, it does not even come close to the feat of a soldier who held the support for 3 weeks. But this is an indicator of the spirit of our men.
      1. +1
        11 November 2024 00: 00
        But this is an indicator of the spirit of our men.


        And what is the spirit of those who abandoned the fighter?
  26. 0
    10 November 2024 23: 20
    There are no words for emotion!!! Man!!!
  27. 0
    11 November 2024 02: 06
    every feat is the result of someone's bungling... it seems like everyone has forgotten about the fighter..
  28. -1
    11 November 2024 06: 47
    three weeks???? - "I swear on my mother!" I understand that we need to write about heroism and courage, such "truth" can be written about a fighter who, let's say, survived three weeks in the forest, on an island. And here is a defensive midfielder!!! Only a bow??? And three weeks?? And no one needed this defensive midfielder???
  29. +1
    11 November 2024 08: 32
    They must give Russia a Hero. Will they give him or forget?
  30. 0
    11 November 2024 09: 41
    Give him the Hero of Russia star and a vacation! Yes
  31. 0
    11 November 2024 13: 04
    Blatant negligence of the commanders! How could they not know about this? How could they send personnel without at least suppressing the VSU artillery?
  32. +1
    11 November 2024 14: 37
    The person made the right remark to you. Go and show how and what is needed. And I will add, you really were couch potatoes in the army, you can take apart and assemble a machine gun. And the army is now a year and a half of the Navy. Half of you who wrote like that dodged the army.
  33. 0
    12 November 2024 08: 09
    "Ukrainian artillery struck the former positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, occupied by our attack aircraft. Under heavy fire, our troops stopped communicating, the command considered the group dead." - well, how is that possible! They truly say: "Any feat is the correction of some crime or negligence."