Donald Trump Returns to the US Presidency. What Does This Mean for Russia?

56
Donald Trump Returns to the US Presidency. What Does This Mean for Russia?


Although all the votes have not yet been counted, the preliminary results of the election are already known – Republican Donald Trump received the necessary number of electoral votes in key states and won a fairly convincing victory. In addition, the Republican Party gained control of the Senate and is likely to gain control of the House of Representatives.



This turn of events is hardly unexpected – in the run-up to the election, preliminary polls showed that Donald Trump’s chances of winning were higher than those of Kamala Harris. Despite the fact that many major media outlets, traditionally supportive of the Democratic Party, assured their readers that Harris could not lose, the mood of the Americans themselves was completely different. Harris was primarily associated with the legacy of Joe Biden (this is what Trump played on), and the attitude of US citizens towards this old man suffering from dementia has been mostly negative in recent years.

In this regard, it would be logical to make certain assumptions about what Trump’s policy might be, including in relation to Russia.

Why Americans Voted for Trump


As is known, the bulk of Donald Trump's electorate is made up of white conservative Americans (especially workers), but in this election he managed to gain the support of very broad groups of the population, including "people of color". No joke - compared to the 2020 elections, he improved his advantage in 2367 counties.

Compared with the Republican’s triumphant 2016 election, Trump’s support has increased across the board, including among voters who were previously skeptical of him. Trump is on track to win all seven swing states. He has made gains in every corner of the U.S. and among nearly every demographic group. Even liberal bastions like San Francisco and Alameda County voted for Trump.

"Ten years ago, Democrats had very different expectations. Many assumed that demographic and generational changes would create a new Democratic majority. But many voters, whom Democrats considered the core of their coalition, were so disillusioned with the current situation that they chose to support Mr. Trump," laments, in particular the liberal New York Times.

In fact, Democrats had a lower chance of winning this election to begin with, as rarely has the party held the White House when the president's approval rating was as low as Joe Biden's. Winning by fraud (as appears to have happened in 2020) is only possible if the margin between the candidates is small, but Trump's margin of victory was so large that it would be difficult to pull off the same trick a second time.

Americans voted for Trump, first, because they were disillusioned with the Democratic Party's policies - even the left-liberal media that supports Harris admits that voters were disillusioned with the Democrats because their campaign was based on the assumption that voters would ignore any concerns about the new administration in order to avoid Donald Trump's reelection. That was a mistake.

Secondly, the agenda that Trump promoted was much closer to the American heart than Harris’s agenda, which, in essence, simply promised to continue Joe Biden’s policies and was not going to make any significant amendments to them.

At the moment, Americans are primarily interested in issues related to the economy and the immigration crisis - and these issues were central to the Republican agenda. This is evidenced by the results of polls of voters in the state of Arizona conducted by American media.

Those who voted for Trump said they believed the former president would improve the economy, lower gas and food prices, and make other countries respect the United States during his presidency.

"The last four years have been tough. The economy has been terrible. The situation at the border has been really bad," Mary Wepprecht noted in particular.

Another Trump voter named U.S. border security and Israel as the two most important issues to him, endorsing Trump's immigration proposals and supporting Israel.

What should Russia expect from Trump?


However, it is time to move on to the main question: what will Donald Trump’s victory mean for Russia?

In my previous materials (see for example “Assassination attempt on Donald Trump: political consequences”) the author has repeatedly noted that the protracted military conflict in Ukraine, despite all the benefits for the United States, requires the United States to use a certain amount of resources and does not allow it to switch to a more important rival/opponent – ​​China, which is taking advantage of the situation. Therefore, it is highly likely that Trump will still try to fulfill his promise and achieve an end to the military conflict in Ukraine.

In Russia, Trump's coming to power was viewed differently - some were hopeful, some were skeptical, and some even regretted that Harris had not won. Some patriotically minded bloggers and public figures expressed the opinion that nothing would change for Russia, that it should go to Kyiv/Lviv, not paying attention to anything, and so on.

The problem is that such fantasies have nothing to do with reality. The Ukrainian Armed Forces, despite a number of sensitive defeats in Donbas, continue to maintain combat capability and can continue military operations for a very long time. The situation of positional deadlock has not gone away. You can talk as much as you like about how Russia does not depend on anyone and decides for itself that, well, “we will win anyway, and everything will be our way” (as journalist Andrei Medvedev put it), but in reality things are somewhat different.

Russia has been dependent on the situation on the international arena for a long time now – immediately after the NWO transformed into a long and exhausting war (with a number of restrictions imposed on the parties by global players). The inability to quickly achieve its goals has put Moscow in a difficult situation – the need to negotiate with other political players who would help circumvent the sanctions, thereby falling into a certain dependence on them.

In this regard, it would be disingenuous to say that the elections in the US have absolutely no impact on the international situation and the CIS.

As for Trump's plan for Ukraine, its main provisions have already been voiced by vice-presidential candidate James David Vance: this plan includes stopping the conflict on the terms of the status quo, creating demilitarized zones, Russia receiving guarantees of neutral status from Ukraine and non-entry into NATO. The United States will not participate in the restoration of Ukraine - Germany and other European countries will finance it.

Today, during his speech to supporters, Trump once again declared that “I’m going to stop wars,” and therefore there is no reason to believe that he will fundamentally change his position. Another question is what exactly Trump will demand in exchange for concessions in Ukraine – no self-respecting politician will give generous gifts for no reason.

Yes, there is no complete certainty that Trump will propose ending the war on terms acceptable to Russia, since there are different opinions on this matter in the Republican Party. However, there are still real chances for the start of negotiations, since Trump prioritizes the problems of the United States itself, and not multi-billion dollar gifts to Ukraine for conducting military operations with Russia. In addition, Trump sees China as America's main enemy, not Russia (unlike Biden and the Democrats).

It is unlikely that any major moves in this direction will be expected before the inauguration of the US President, but in these two months News and statements by politicians, we will find out in what direction American policy will move. It is possible that by the end of January, the Democrats, while their representative (in the person of Joe Biden) occupies the White House, will try to do everything to disrupt the possible negotiation process.
56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    6 November 2024 17: 44
    What does this mean for Russia? - The question is somewhat shallow. What does this mean for the Galaxy? That's what needs to be asked.
    1. +6
      6 November 2024 17: 57
      What does this mean for Russia...???

      Not a damn thing good... A tyrant is a tyrant even in America with all his unpredictability... However, I hope the Americans won't be bored either... How is BLM doing...??? am
      1. +2
        6 November 2024 19: 05
        Quote: Lev_Russia
        There's nothing good about it... He's a tyrant, even in America, with all his unpredictability...

        His stupidity is in words, but in reality he can’t do anything, well, maybe put up a fence on the border with Mexico and force Europe to pay for Ukraine.
      2. +6
        6 November 2024 20: 33
        For our country, either candidate is bad, Trump or Harris. The US is our enemy.
        1. -4
          6 November 2024 22: 12
          For our country, either candidate is bad, Trump or Harris. The US is our enemy.


          Take it with you
          So as not to fall while walking.
    2. +1
      6 November 2024 17: 59
      Quote from Lemur2023
      The question is somewhat shallowly put. What does this mean for the Galaxy? That's what needs to be asked.

      If only Yellowstone doesn't vote by throwing out... Otherwise there will be nothing to lead, and no one to ask...
    3. 0
      6 November 2024 21: 02
      Quote from Lemur2023
      What does this mean for the Galaxy? That's what you need to ask.

      For the Galaxy, this means that there will be one less planet. hi
    4. man
      +1
      6 November 2024 23: 08
      What does this mean for Russia?
      Gazprom to Build Gas Pipeline to California
    5. +1
      6 November 2024 23: 28
      Quote from Lemur2023
      What does this mean for the Galaxy?

      For me, Russia is still more important than some galaxy.
  2. +2
    6 November 2024 17: 47
    It is unlikely that the US presidents can be considered sufficiently independent persons in politics. Whatever the consensus opinion of the beneficiaries of the capitalist hydra of America will be, such will be the actions of their president.
  3. +6
    6 November 2024 17: 48
    It is unlikely that anything will change for Russia, but his victory is an indicator that the people of the United States are beginning to understand when they are being manipulated. Trump was slandered in the media, they tried to sue him, they staged an assassination attempt, but despite this, he won the election. As for the Democrats, they got too carried away, first they tried to play the card with the first female candidate Clinton, they lost, then they decided to nominate a female candidate for vice president with the aim that Biden would have to win a second term and then leave, leaving the place to Vice President Harris, but his health deteriorated, he lost the debates, as a result, they had to nominate Harris in the elections, thereby again playing the card of the first female president, but again failure.
    1. +13
      6 November 2024 18: 12
      Quote: Lt. air force reserve
      The American people are beginning to understand when they are being manipulated
      I immediately remember our presidential elections in 2018, when the candidate from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, Grudinin, was slandered from every iron.
      1. man
        +2
        6 November 2024 22: 44
        Quote: Vitaly_pvo
        Quote: Lt. air force reserve
        The American people are beginning to understand when they are being manipulated
        I immediately remember our presidential elections in 2018, when the candidate from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, Grudinin, was slandered from every iron.

        But in the 2024 elections, no one said a single bad word about Grudinin!
        Our government is changing for the better! fellow
  4. +5
    6 November 2024 17: 53
    Donald Trump Returns to the US Presidency. What Does This Mean for Russia?
  5. +3
    6 November 2024 17: 53
    Donald Trump Returns to the US Presidency. What Does This Mean for Russia?
    . In fact... what to expect from a person who is "unpredictable"???
    Drinking champagne to his victory... is somehow stupid, to put it mildly.
    1. 0
      6 November 2024 18: 39
      At the same time, he promised all voters to stop the SVO in one call to VVP. It seems to me that VVP will recommend him to have a rest in Peru after the elections, I don’t remember the coordinates
      1. +1
        6 November 2024 19: 39
        If you can say about Trump that he is unpredictable, then you can say different things about GDP, but it is worth waiting... honestly, who knows what to expect request
        By the way, there is also an opinion that all processes are controlled from behind the scenes. bully
      2. man
        0
        6 November 2024 23: 10
        I think VVP will recommend him to take a vacation in Peru after the elections.
        It makes more sense in Venezuela
  6. +1
    6 November 2024 17: 55
    Therefore, it is highly likely that Trump will still try to fulfill his promise and achieve an end to the military conflict in Ukraine.

    Will Russia be satisfied with Trump's attempts to end the conflict in Ukraine without taking into account Russian conditions for negotiations?
    You can promise everything, but it is not always possible to fulfill your promise.
  7. -1
    6 November 2024 17: 57
    Has Trump won already? belay
    1. 0
      6 November 2024 23: 32
      Quote: Bone1
      Has Trump won already?

      Well, actually, yes, and everyone has already acknowledged this.
  8. +3
    6 November 2024 17: 59
    Wow, quite an adequate article, Trump is in a better position than in his first term, it will not be possible to block his actions through parliament, he will only need to agree with his party, this is easier in any case, but he will hardly be able to offer Putin a big deal, Russia is too demonized, only something like China's invasion of Taiwan could change the situation.
  9. -1
    6 November 2024 18: 00
    For Russia, this means absolutely nothing! By definition!!!!! All this mmmmney on UkraineIt is not the US presidents and the British prime ministers who are in charge, but the military-industrial complex of both countries, for whom Russia is a thorn in the side! And at the same time they understand that they cannot defeat RUSH, but they can make some money!!!!
  10. -3
    6 November 2024 18: 00
    I think we need to ask ourselves what Trump could possibly be useful to the US/UK "deep state" in their plans right now?
    We know that the Anglo-Saxons are now unleashing their war to destroy Russia by the hands of NATO countries and Ukraine. Despite the fact that they want to carry out this destruction "by other people's hands", nevertheless, it represents a serious danger for the Master and the main member of NATO - the USA.
    Formally leaving NATO, “putting the war on track” and retaining all informal levers of control is an additional guarantee against receiving a response from Russia.
    To leave NATO, a previously prepared exit route and a person in power who has the support of the population in its implementation are needed. Trump is such a person.
    It is possible that this know-how was once offered to him by the US/UK "deep state" in anticipation of its own NATO war plan against Russia that was being developed/implemented. Now Trump has come in handy.
  11. +1
    6 November 2024 18: 01
    What does this mean for Russia? We scolded Biden, we will scold Trump. We will definitely not kiss gums, for this we need not Trump but Gorbachev or Yeltsin (may they not be mentioned at night... ugh, ugh) and not in the USA but in Russia.
  12. HAM
    0
    6 November 2024 18: 10
    Why has there been no reaction from the White House all this time... Are they protecting Biden from bad news?
    As for the relations between the US and Russia - we have already seen it during his first term, nothing in the relations has changed for the better and will not change.... only during his first administration Trump was more busy with the squabbles unleashed against him, now he is freer in his actions (if they don't shoot him first).......... and what's in his shaggy head, he himself does not always know.... at least he fantasized a lot of things in his election speeches....
  13. +1
    6 November 2024 18: 19
    For Trump, the overall priority is
    1) Creation of a new, more favorable trade balance with China. And, in general, weakening China.
    2) Building a new balance in relation to Europe. In which the US occupies an advantageous trading position, while the EU is given greater independence, including in matters of defense.
    3) American problems - the border, the return of production, and in general relaxation after globalist experiments.
    The Russian Federation is of secondary importance to him, and in general he is not inclined to punish its authorities for violating the "world order". A weak capitalist Russian Federation, but not lying under the PRC and not being a zone of chaos, suits him just fine.
    Hence his plan for Ukraine, which the author of the article outlined quite correctly - a truce, guarantees, etc.
    The key question and the key contradiction is that his plan does not involve a peace treaty that would recognize any territorial losses on the part of Ukraine. But simply stopping the conflict (ceasefire) does not suit the Russian authorities very well.
    1. +1
      6 November 2024 18: 46
      The key question and the key contradiction is that his plan does not involve a peace treaty that would recognize any territorial losses on the part of Ukraine. But simply stopping the conflict (ceasefire) does not suit the Russian authorities very well.


      Yes, this is the key issue, stopping the fighting on the current line of contact is a strong political blow for politicians on both sides of the conflict. In Ukraine, they will naturally raise the question of why it was necessary to fight for almost three years, when it was possible to sign agreements in the spring of 22 and do without casualties and destruction, in Russia, the same thing will be asked in society, why it was necessary to start all this if in the end the situation was worse than it was at the beginning of 22.
      1. +1
        7 November 2024 00: 51
        Quote: Oldrover
        in Russia everything is the same in society the question will be asked

        I agree, but with some clarifications. In the Russian Federation, the authorities don't give a damn what society says, especially since society is so tortured by the war that it will welcome any end to this war (except for total surrender). It is much more important that the truce does not give anything to the Russian authorities themselves. The sanctions will remain (Trump will be able to soften them at most), legally no one will recognize anything, which means that everything controlled by Russia will be a suitcase without a handle with an uncertain future. So why do Putin and Co. need this? They say outright that they are not happy with this.
        As for Ukraine, for their authorities, a truce is almost an automatic parting with power. No one will need them anymore. Rather, external sponsors will benefit from the rotation. But for them, this is a small problem, the guys will simply cash out and calmly go west, as the first Maidan government of Yatsenyuk already did.
  14. +1
    6 November 2024 18: 26
    The author was in such a hurry to print his text that he didn’t bother with the placement of commas.
  15. -1
    6 November 2024 18: 33
    The system of power in the US is built in such a way that it doesn't matter at all who occupies the oval office or has a majority in Congress. Neither foreign nor domestic policy will change fundamentally. And if Trump or any other President suddenly tries to do something there, they will very quickly find themselves in the same place as their predecessor Kennedy.
  16. 0
    6 November 2024 18: 37
    Donald Trump Returns to the US Presidency. What Does This Mean for Russia?


    First of all, Trump is a businessman first and foremost.
    Secondly, Trump has obligations to his sponsors.

    From this we must proceed.

    "...if you look at the political priorities of corporations, it is immediately obvious that the military-industrial complex, airlines and heavy industry prefer to finance Trump and give practically no money to the Democrats. At the same time, the banking sector and high-tech do not make a difference in the campaign to collect donations for the Republican candidate. As of September 2024, Trump's main donors were American Airlines, Walmart, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, United Airlines, FedEx, Wells Fargo, Johnson & Johnson, Brown & Brown, Southwest Airlines, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, Costco, Inter & Co., Morgan Stanley, Microsoft, GEO Group, Delta Airlines, General Motors, Home Depot. ..." https://zavtra.ru/blogs/sponsori_trampa_i_harris_kto_oni

    "...The fact that one of Donald Trump's main sponsors is the American military-industrial complex cannot but be alarming.

     The rule "tell me who your sponsor is and I'll tell you who you are" works well for the US political elite. Certain forces are interested in the victory of one candidate or another - some for ideological reasons, others to protect their commercial interests, others to keep their participation in the political game afloat...."

    More:
    https://ruskline.ru/opp/2024/10/04/sponsory_trampa_i_harris_kto_oni
  17. 0
    6 November 2024 18: 38
    For Russia, Trump and Harris are equally bad, because the US is starting to lose its hegemony, which it gained in 1991 by breaking up the USSR. And it will fight for its hegemony like a cornered rat. They started with Russia because they considered it a weaker link with a rusty ideology, economy and corrupt oligarchs in power. China was supposed to be next. But it didn’t work out with Russia. But they will try to squeeze it out. Therefore, relations will only get worse. And they will get worse until they are afraid of it again. Then a balance will be established and relations will start to improve outwardly.
  18. -2
    6 November 2024 18: 43
    It is possible to say for sure that in the USA democracy is crookedly awry, but the second one works here on topvar many commentators hit the nail on the head when they said that Trump will be imprisoned, Trump will be killed before the elections, the elections will be falsified, the Democrats will throw in ballots. It is funny, when I argued here about ballot stuffing that in the USA with their election system by states, ballot stuffing does not give the same result as in systems where only votes are counted.
    And so I honestly thought that Harris would win in a close result, simply because she is younger than Trump and the Democrats also bet on this after Biden was replaced, but this was not enough, it's funny that in 2020 Biden got a total of 84 million votes, Trump 74, now Trump got 71M, Harris 66M, which means that 19 million Democrat voters simply ignored and on Reddit there are quite a lot of Democrat supporters writing that they are not voting for Trump and they don't like Harris either, so they simply did not go to the polls. Democratic political scientists miscalculated with Harris, apparently the American community is not ready for a woman president.
    1. -1
      6 November 2024 22: 06
      Even as of 22.00:98 Moscow time, at least 99-14% of the votes have not been reported in 71,8 states. Trump has processed 67 million votes, Harris - 10,5 million. They will still count 11-XNUMX million votes in two or three hours.
  19. -1
    6 November 2024 18: 43
    The neutral status of Ukraine... don't forget that the Finns and Swedes have also been neutral for a long time, and where are they now? All this can be easily replayed. And therefore the cunning planner will say that he was deceived once again. Although, given the Kremlin's persistent desire for a deal on Ukraine, it is clear that it will be signed and all the Solovyov-Skobeyevs will present it as a great victory for VVP.
  20. 0
    6 November 2024 18: 43
    As I understand it, 2 articles were written in advance for both candidates. The one who won was the one that was published.
  21. -1
    6 November 2024 18: 47
    To promise is not to marry. For 8 years Obama has changed practically nothing, although he promised a lot.
    Putin's address to the Security Council in 2024 is also practically no different from his speech in 2012. That is, the cart is still there
  22. 0
    6 November 2024 18: 53
    Whoever wins in America, it all depends mainly on the guys at the front.
  23. -1
    6 November 2024 18: 53
    As is known, the bulk of Donald Trump's electorate is made up of white conservative Americans (especially workers), but in this election he managed to gain the support of very broad groups of the population, including "people of color". No joke - compared to the 2020 elections, he improved his advantage in 2367 counties.


    Well, you can't rush so much while Trump has received less absolute votes than in 2020, the Democrats' problem is that after Biden decided to refuse to participate in the elections, they did not hold primaries (yes, I agree that there are nuances there that funds had already been collected for Biden/Harris and there are internal procedures that had to be bypassed), but this greatly upset many Democrats and they simply did not go to the elections. In numbers, Biden received over 2020 million votes in 80, and Harris has now received 66 million votes and since Trump's indicators have not improved since the last elections, it is obvious that a significant part of the Democrats simply did not take part in the elections. Well, you can still talk about padding, but this is all conspiracy theories.
  24. +1
    6 November 2024 19: 01
    An enemy just like any other inhabitant of the White House.
  25. +1
    6 November 2024 19: 31
    It is a bad sign for us if we worry about what this means for Russia. The answer to everything is in Russia, not outside of it.
  26. 0
    6 November 2024 20: 32
    In short and to the point: there is no point in expecting "manna from heaven" from the Trump Administration... He will implement the behavioral scenario that has long been written for him and for K. Harris, the true leaders of the United States, with minor "variations"... The main thing for the Russian nomenklatura is not to build illusions on this account, and, most importantly, not to relax... US policy towards Russia will continue within the framework of strict containment, restrictions, "pressure across the entire field" of international and financial and economic relations... Peace - friendship - chewing gum - in the distant past!!!!!!!!!!
  27. -1
    6 November 2024 20: 57
    You can laugh, but the real situation is still like this
    99% counted - 33 states. Trump 223, Harris 139
    Let's see if they screw in the "Harris step", for example, in Nevada. So far this tool has hardly been used, which is of course very interesting.
  28. 0
    6 November 2024 21: 02
    What it means is quite obvious. He is without politeness - ambiguous diplomatic talk.
    Trump talked about his method of ending the conflict - an airlift to deliver huge amounts of stuff to Ukraine - if Russia kicks.
    Complete cessation of aid to Ukraine - if Ukraine starts to act up.
    And the result is a fixed match; he doesn’t really care about the conditions, as long as it ends.
    Most likely, along the troop lines.
  29. 0
    6 November 2024 23: 26
    Why would the Democrats want to disrupt the negotiation process? On the contrary, they can steal this victory from Trump before his inauguration. And then shout that it was we, the Democrats, who stopped the military conflict, not Trump.
  30. 0
    6 November 2024 23: 44
    Wars don't just start like that; there has to be a serious reason for it.
    Without going into details, the EU has such a reason – the Eastern Partnership strategic plan, the implementation of which is currently in its final stages with the Russian Federation.
    The US had virtually no trade turnover with the Russian Federation, and it remains so – what is there to divide and why be exposed to the threat of mutual nuclear destruction?
    The US trade turnover with the EU is under a billion, and the EU military-industrial complex is underdeveloped and has always served as an add-on to the US. The war has shown the full damage of this situation and the US cannot leave the EU without support but wants to free itself from the burden of the EU war with Russia. The EU understands that without the US it will not be able to handle such a burden without internal strife and opposes this in every possible way, speaking out against elephants and specifically against Trump, supporting donkeys. The uniqueness of Trump's victory is that he had to fight opponents both within the US and in the EU.
    Elephants call China their main enemy, with whom the US has a huge imbalance in trade, and attempts to resolve the issue through negotiations or within the WTO have led to nothing. As the 45th president, Trump started a trade war and introduced a host of prohibitive duties against China, but they turned out to be fragmentary and ineffective. Today, Trump promises a systemic war with China on all fronts, and to win, he needs to drive a wedge between China and Russia.
    This can only be done by ending the war in Europe, which is what he promised to do.
    The victory of the elephants promises a truce for the Russian Federation (because the EU has not abandoned and will not abandon the Eastern Partnership program, which primarily includes Belarus, Ukraine and the Transcaucasian state entities) and bargaining, and war for the PRC.
  31. 0
    7 November 2024 01: 14
    It seems that we need to bring out the half-forgotten rhetoric of Trump abuse, which we have become unaccustomed to during the years of his stay outside the "oval office." Because the US military-industrial complex will not allow him to appease the Russian Federation on the Ukrainian issue. And if it does, then only in exchange for a joint alliance with Russia against China, because the American oligarchy is unlikely to be satisfied with any other condition.
  32. 0
    7 November 2024 03: 54
    Winning by fraud (as apparently happened in 2020) is only possible if the gap between the candidates is small, but this time Trump's advantage was very significant, and it would be problematic to pull off such a trick a second time.


    The Democrats could have quite consciously given all the power to the Republicans and become self-defeating in a hopeless situation. Now all the negativity for future problems created by the Democrats will go exclusively to the Republicans, and the Democrats will turn out to be soft and fluffy.
    There are a lot of problems, but there are no painless solutions:
    1. Involvement in the Third World War through support of Israel, South Korea, Taiwan, or Ukraine.
    2. Servicing the external debt and the most difficult problems in the US economy.

    The solution is simple! Let Trump and the Republicans deal with this, raking in all the negativity like Yeltsin, and when the light appears at the end of the tunnel, We (the good Democrats) will emerge and lead the country into a bright future.
  33. +1
    7 November 2024 09: 36
    It is extremely offensive that the president in the distant USA will influence my life. And it makes me angry that our elites allow this and do not even fight it.
    And about Trump I want to say that he is a strong leader who will bend the whole world as he wants.
  34. 0
    7 November 2024 11: 59
    1) On a global scale, the US will turn against China.
    2) Working with Trump will be easier in some places and harder in others. But the meaning of the relationship will not change, we are competitors to the level of an enemy.
  35. 0
    7 November 2024 12: 34
    Trump has already called and changed his tune.
  36. +1
    7 November 2024 21: 18
    Nothing will change for Russia.
  37. 0
    7 November 2024 21: 22
    But it doesn’t mean anything, it will only get worse.
    He will again be accused of all mortal sins and connections with VVP, and he will go out of his way to prove the opposite.
    By the way, it is still unknown what Ivanka will sing to him, like that time when he attacked Syria with Tomahawks at the slander of his daughter.
  38. 0
    7 November 2024 23: 41
    Nothing other than the withdrawal of all US bases around the world and the closure of NATO as a tool against Russia will be accepted.
    1. 0
      7 November 2024 23: 44
      But a certain McInnis from the CSIS think tank believes that this is what will happen.