Automatic line of Rostselmash

43
Automatic line of Rostselmash

History collectivization was connected at one end with the history of mechanical engineering, since the plan envisaged the saturation of agriculture, in particular state farms, machine-tractor stations and collective farms, with various equipment. This equipment still had to be produced, and in this matter for a country in which large-scale flow-type mechanical engineering was only just developing, there were serious difficulties.

However, there were achievements in this. Thus, the first automatic lines in the USSR were connected precisely with agricultural engineering. Many have heard about Inochkin's line for processing parts of the NATI-A crawler tractor at the Stalingrad Tractor Plant, but it seems that little is known about the fact that Rostselmash created its own automatic line before the war. Moreover, this line had its own specifics.



"Stalinets-1"


Order of Lenin, Order of the October Revolution, Order of the Red Banner of Labor and Order of Honor Rostselmash Combine Plant LLC exists and operates to this day, having survived numerous upheavals. The plant issued its first products on July 21, 1929; at that time, plows, seeders, and binders were manufactured. Soon, the nature of production changed dramatically, and the plant switched to the production of combines. The first of them rolled off the assembly line on January 24, 1932.
Easy to write, but hard to do. The plant was originally designed to produce horse-drawn agricultural machinery, but it was necessary to produce trailed agricultural machinery. The plant design was radically redesigned twice, and four more times small but large-scale changes were made.

At the same time, the first combine harvester was being designed by a group of engineers: I. I. Zimin, P. I. Guryanov and A. A. Yakovenko. The work began in the fall of 1929. The prototypes were American, but Soviet engineers largely took their own path. In particular, the first prototype "Kolkhoz" was developed as a universal one and could harvest not only grain crops, but also sunflower, corn and millet. In the summer of 1930, "Kolkhoz" passed comparative tests with American analogues and was soon slightly improved. The new version was called "Stalinets". Subsequently, several more advanced modifications were developed on its basis, so the first version was called "Stalinets-1".


"Stalinets-1" on display at the Rostselmash Museum

The combine was trailed, that is, it was towed across the field by a tractor, but at the same time it had its own engine to drive the 6,7-meter-wide header, thresher and other mechanisms. On self-propelled combines, the header is placed in front, and on trailed combines it was located on the side, in this case on the right in the direction of travel. The combine combines cutting of ears, their threshing and separation of grain from straw and chaff.

The adherents of the "Holodomor" theory have always found it difficult to explain, from the point of view of their views, the appearance of the combine harvester on Soviet fields. They can be helped a little with this. The combine harvester must have been a means of mechanized robbery of the peasants. If the peasants were forced to reap grain with sickles or scythes, they would, at any moment, scatter a handful of ears of corn into their pockets. With the combine, all the grain, bypassing the hungry mouths of the collective farmers, disappears into the iron belly of this machine, and from there straight into the bottomless granaries of the state. The "Holodomor" adherents did not yet have this thesis? Well, they still need to be consistent in their worldview, even if it reaches the point of absurdity.

If we put aside the cynical mockery about the "Holodomor", which can easily be brought to the point of absurdity, then the importance of combines can be expressed in numbers. Once in the Chkalovsk region (this was most likely 1939 or 1940), two "Stalinets-1" combines in a hitch harvested 6012 hectares. The same work would have required 1637 people, 373 horses, 25 reapers, 25 threshers, 25 winnowers, 40 sorters. If harvesting by hand, 3323 people would have been needed. The combine was serviced by five people on the machine, one on the hauler and one on the tractor. A total of 7 people.


"Stalinets" are hitched. The header is fixed rigidly, using a spacer pipe, its far end is equipped with a field wheel. The second combine can be hitched to a hook located behind the field wheel of the header of the first combine.

The Stalinets-1 was good; during its production period from 1932 to October 1941, 56 thousand combines of this type were produced.

Automatic line


But there was one bottleneck in the production of this remarkable combine, which forced the development of an automatic line. Since the reaper or header was located on the Stalinets-1 on the side of the combine, there was a need for a conveyor that would transfer the mown ears to the thresher. Structurally, this was a sheet of very strong fabric, along the edges of which were laid belts riveted with rivets, and wooden planks located 25,5 cm apart.


This photo clearly shows the conveyor in the header, which presented many problems in its production.

In order to assemble the web of this conveyor, it was necessary to punch 520 holes, install 520 rivets, 65 strips and 390 cup washers. All this was done manually. There were 100 workers in the web department, and their strength was not enough to provide the combines with web, without which they could not work. As production grew, this bottleneck became more and more noticeable. As a result, electrical engineer N. V. Yatskovsky and mechanical engineer S. A. Sakhansky took on the development of an automatic line that could solve this problem.

It took a fair amount of ingenuity, but they managed to design, build, and get the line up and running. The machine produced 8 sheets in an 370-hour shift, which would have required 900 workers in the sheet department to make them by hand.

The engineers divided the entire process into separate stages, placed sequentially, which were performed by machines. The web was placed on a conveyor with a pitch of 225 mm, moving at a certain rate.

The first stop was to punch holes, for which 8 devices were installed, four on each side.

The second stop was the installation of rivets. Rivets from a bunker, into which they were poured in bulk, were fed into a rotating drum, from there into catchers with grooves, and from there into magazines, from which they were put into place.

The third stop was installing cup washers on rivets. For these washers, a hopper with an oval bottom was designed, in the center of which there was a slot for the washer on the edge. After this slot, the washer passed the wheel with blades, and from there into the washer guide. Before installing the washers, two control holes were passed to be installed correctly.

The fourth stop is the installation of the planks, which were previously fed through two conveyors with sorting by position; on the first, the plank passed only in the flat position, on the second - only with the rounded side up.

The fifth stop is riveting, for which 8 hammers were installed, four on each side.

Then the canvas was nailed to the planks using a special nailing machine.

The line was developed in late 1939 – early 1940 and was definitely operational in the summer of 1940. In any case, S. M. Strakhov’s brochure, in which this line was described as operational, was submitted to the printers on October 25, 1940, meaning the manuscript was prepared sometime in September of that year. This line operated for a little over a year until the evacuation of Rostselmash began in October 1941. What happened to this line is unknown. It is possible that it was simply abandoned during the evacuation.

Rostselmash transported 3500 wagons of evacuation cargo to Tashkent and Chirchik, taking mainly foundry, forging and pressing, and metal-cutting equipment. In Uzbekistan, the plant, like many other agricultural machinery plants, produced strictly military products: 82-mm and 120-mm mines, 50-kg, 100-kg, and 250-kg aerial bombs. After the liberation of Rostov on February 14, 1943, the plant gave its first products on February 23 of the same year, also military.


Immediately after its liberation, Rostselmash was a pile of ruins.

The plant produced ammunition, repaired equipment and returned to combines only in 1947. "Stalinets-6" - the first post-war combine, was also a trailed one with a side-mounted reaper. In theory, it should also have had the same conveyor. However, it was not possible to find out for sure whether the post-war "Rostselmash" had an automatic line for the production of canvases. This is how we value our own achievements.
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    11 November 2024 07: 58
    Replacement of 900 workers and no migrants, mind you!
    The country's food security is only slightly less important than its military security.
    1. +3
      11 November 2024 09: 39
      Replacement of 900 workers and no migrants, mind you!
      The country's food security is only slightly less important than its military security.


      Because at the head of the country there was truly a people's power. And not a comprador bourgeoisie as it is now.
      1. +2
        11 November 2024 12: 09
        Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
        Replacement of 900 workers and no migrants, mind you!
        The country's food security is only slightly less important than its military security.


        Because at the head of the country there was truly a people's power. And not a comprador bourgeoisie as it is now.

        The "comprador bourgeoisie" imported "limited" 30 years to factories in Moscow.....
        So "they came in droves" was not invented yesterday...
        1. +6
          11 November 2024 12: 21
          The "comprador bourgeoisie" imported "limited" 30 years to factories in Moscow.....
          So "they came in droves" was not invented yesterday...


          I understand that, due to your age, you only know about the so-called “limit” what the propaganda of the capitalist Russian Federation has told you.
          Only the reality was different. The USSR economy was developing and there was a shortage of workers.
          And many enterprises used such an incentive as the opportunity to obtain an apartment much faster than in the usual city queue to attract them.
          Moscow and other large cities additionally used a method called registration.
          By the way, the Russian Federation has not abandoned this institution.
          1. +3
            11 November 2024 16: 48
            Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
            I understand that, due to your age, you only know about the so-called “limit” what the propaganda of the capitalist Russian Federation has told you.

            Lol. I lived in Moscow during the USSR and I know what "limita" is.

            Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
            And many enterprises used such an incentive as the opportunity to obtain an apartment much faster than in the usual city queue to attract them.
            -because you NOT you know, then I will remind you - that the "limit" was used only only in Moscow and Leningrad. Because "Muscovites" have never worked in factories and will not do so under any government.
            At ZIL, they awarded the Hero of Socialist Labor title for 15 years of service on the assembly line - and there were very few of those. That's why they brought in "limited" people - there was no one to work.
            In all The rest of the cities of the USSR managed quite well without "Limita" - there were no Muscovites there, there were enough workers and there was no opportunity to just kick the can down the drain.

            Moreover, in 1979 my aunt and uncle (children's doctors) from Penza were invited to Moscow as relatively young people (they graduated from the institute in 1972). lol ) specialists - the aunt got tired of living with her mother-in-law and they moved to Moscow to a communal apartment. In Penza they were promised housing by 1983 belay
            There was a shortage in Moscow belay pediatricians - given the presence of a BUNCH of medical institutes
            1. +4
              11 November 2024 16: 56

              Lol. I lived in Moscow during the USSR and I know what "limita" is.


              Then it’s clear where you have such disdain for limiters.

              - since you do NOT know, I will remind you that the “limit” was used exclusively in Moscow and Leningrad.


              Yes, yes, you know a lot, given that you were born in 1970.
              And haven't you heard that there was also a limit in the capitals of the union republics? It happens. lol
              1. -3
                11 November 2024 17: 09
                Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                Yes, yes, you know a lot, given that you were born in 1970.
                And haven't you heard that there was also a limit in the capitals of the union republics? It happens.

                You apparently worked part-time in the capitals of the Union republics in the intervals between flights? Well, well...

                Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                Then it’s clear where you have such disdain for limiters.
                - No, since then I have a prejudice against Muscovites. But unfortunately, even then there were more of them than normal Muscovites
                1. +2
                  11 November 2024 17: 20
                  You apparently worked part-time in the capitals of the Union republics in the intervals between flights? Well, well...


                  What, in your opinion, is this the only way to gain knowledge about the subject of the question? You have an original way of thinking. lol
                  And has such a simple option, that the military collective is international, of different ages, and was called up from different places, never occurred to you?
                  And the fact that senior comrades shared their experience about where it is better to settle in reserve, and what difficulties there are in doing so.

                  - No, since then I have a prejudice against Muscovites. But unfortunately, even then there were more of them than normal Muscovites


                  That is, prejudice against oneself? Why the hell did you even raise the topic of limits?
                  1. -1
                    11 November 2024 17: 43
                    Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                    And has such a simple option, that the military collective is international, of different ages, and was called up from different places, never occurred to you?

                    And hasn't it occurred to you that the same simple option that I had an "international military collective"?
                    And also the fact that I worked, studied and communicated with quite large groups of people?
                    Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                    And the fact that senior comrades shared their experience about where it is better to settle in reserve, and what difficulties there are in doing so.
                    -flyers knew something about the factory workers? Well, well...


                    Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                    Why the hell did you even raise the topic of limits?

                    Have you tried reading? Answer to the joyful:
                    Quote: Vladimir_2U
                    Replacement of 900 workers and no migrants, mind you!
                    and your further show-offs
                    1. -2
                      11 November 2024 21: 24
                      And hasn't it occurred to you that the same simple option that I had an "international military collective"?
                      And also the fact that I worked, studied and communicated with quite large groups of people?


                      A conscript team?

                      - Did the pilots know anything about the factory workers? Well, well...


                      Is it news to you that in the aforementioned cities, migration of the population was specifically limited? That is where this registration by limit comes from. And this limit was distributed both between enterprises and other organizations, including military registration and enlistment offices. Didn't you know?
                      And even for those officers who were called to service from the capital and other capital cities, it was very difficult to return to retirement.
                      This was one of the most pressing topics of discussion in the smoking room: how and where to settle down in retirement.


                      Have you tried to read?


                      So how did your migrants and the limited ones suddenly become the same?
                      1. -1
                        12 November 2024 07: 21
                        Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                        A conscript team?

                        Well, it's clear, the pilots are above people. Some kind of cattle in the conscription service, they are something else...
                        I don't see any point in talking further with people like that.
                      2. -1
                        12 November 2024 09: 24
                        Well, it's clear, the pilots are above people. Some kind of cattle in the conscription service, they are something else...
                        I don't see any point in talking further with people like that.


                        Sorry, but you were the only one who called conscripts cattle.
                        But I was surprised: why should soldiers who have never served an extended term, warrant officers, officers, be concerned about such issues as retirement from service and receiving apartments?
                        However, you admitted that you do not know this topic. lol
                2. +3
                  11 November 2024 19: 22
                  No, since then I have a prejudice against Muscovites. But unfortunately, even then there were more of them than normal Muscovites.

                  Yes, that's how it was. On construction sites, in the factory, in the workshop, workers very often worked as limited, who lived in a dormitory, including a family one. After about 10 years, they received an apartment and a permanent residence permit, becoming Muscovites. That's how it was. By the way, it was not easy to register in Moscow - they did not register so easily. In many regional centers, there were also problems with registration.
  2. +7
    11 November 2024 10: 02
    Good morning. Chkalovskaya Oblast, which is now Orenburg. I'm from there. Question for the author. How long did it take to harvest these 6012 hectares? I don't remember Stalinets, of course, I wasn't there then, but I hauled grain from the SK 3 and SK 4 combines to the threshing floor. They didn't have a cabin, there was only a tarpaulin "roof" on top to protect from the sun. Two people worked on the combine, the combine operator himself and an assistant, usually the assistant was a senior school kid. I don't remember the productivity, and I didn't work on the combine itself.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +1
        11 November 2024 17: 08
        Quote from Frettaskyrandi
        in a hurry I copied it incorrectly

        Counted:
        Area, ha 6012
        Productivity, c/ha 9
        Harvest, c 54108 kg 5410800
        Capacity of the threshing machine Stalinets-1, kg/s 2,5
        Threshing time, s 2164320
        hour 601,2
        days 30,06 (at 20 hours per day)
        conclusion - not realistic! Equipment needs to be serviced, cleaning during dew and rain is not allowed... request
    2. 0
      11 November 2024 17: 12
      Quote: Blacksmith 55
      I don’t remember the productivity, and I didn’t work on the combine itself.

      As far as I remember, SK-5 harvested 9-10 hectares per day... hi
    3. 0
      12 November 2024 15: 41
      SK 3 and SK 4

      Self-propelled combine harvester (SK), and the number is productivity (threshed mass - kg/s).
  3. -14
    11 November 2024 10: 38
    If you force peasants to reap grain with sickles or scythes, they will probably throw a handful of ears of corn into their pockets. With a combine, all the grain disappears past the hungry mouths of the collective farmers into the iron belly of this machine, and from there straight into the bottomless bins of the state. Didn't the "Holodomorists" have this thesis yet? Well, they still need to be consistent in their worldview, even if it reaches the point of absurdity.

    yeah, I haven't seen a more absurd paragraph in a long time

    That's about it "bottomless "granaries" - that's right: there was often no bottom there, we read the reports of the OGPU and NKVD of the 1930s: losses during planting, tending, harvesting, transportation, storage.
    Losses are always 30% of the harvest.

    1938, hundreds of thousands of enemies have already been shot, but the cart is still there:
    CA FSB RF. F. 3. Op. 5.D. 87.L. 453-455.

    № 71

    To all People's Commissars of the Union and Autonomous Republics, Heads of Regional and Provincial NKVD Directorates

    The NKVD's operational support of the harvesting work in state and collective farms is unsatisfactory. Data is still coming in from the field, covering preparations for the harvest, while in the main decisive regions of the Union the harvesting work is in full swing. The first days of the harvest in a number of regions of the Union are already characterized by:

    . Poor organization of agricultural harvesting work, in particular: a) failure to meet harvesting calendar deadlines; b) completely inadequate control of crop losses by local organization leaders; c) insufficient use of combines, large amounts of downtime for harvesting machines;

    d) poor organization of grain storage and weak control of theft of collective farm harvests; d) unsatisfactory operation of grain transportation and unpreparedness of warehouse facilities.


    Offering:

    1. Immediately organize comprehensive intelligence and operational support for the progress of harvesting work on state and collective farms, setting as the main task the timely suppression and exposure of the activities of hostile elements attempting to disrupt the normal course of grain harvesting.

    2. Pay special attention to the timely identification and elimination of the main shortcomings in grain harvesting, [in] particular, the fight against losses, transportation, and preparation of warehouse facilities for storing grain from the new harvest.

    3. Organize storage of bread through the police

    HEDGEHOG

    and so it has been for all 70 years: an exhausting, all-encompassing, but always losing “battle” for bread.

    While other countries collected much more without any battles, losses, millions of victims, without the NKVD, Politburo and instructions from an entire General Secretary... burn out ticks under warehouse floors

    And in 1937 people were still dying of hunger and schoolchildren were begging (Historical Materialism)
    1. +4
      11 November 2024 11: 30
      I knew you would like it.
      1. -2
        11 November 2024 17: 10
        Quote: wehr
        I knew you would like it.

        Do you like dancing on bones and making fun of those who died of starvation in the 1930s?
        You are a real communist Stalinist!
        1. 0
          11 November 2024 20: 34
          Well, at least after a quarter of a century of my work I have earned this title. laughing
          Yes, I am for large factories and "wheat factories", and taking into account the future - for direct synthesis of food from elementary substances. Any whim in the form of a blue-green briquette.

          Your "Holodomor" theory is absurd. It postulates that your ancestors were so timid that it would have been enough to point a revolver at them, rob them clean, and they would have obediently died of hunger.
          My theory is that there was a fierce struggle for and against the new system, in which both sides had their own truth, and both sides did not take into account the losses and victims.
          1. 0
            12 November 2024 13: 30
            Quote: wehr
            and taking into account the future - for the direct synthesis of food from elementary substances.

            let's say you are poorly educated in this matter... basic education in the humanities? hi
            Quote: wehr
            Your "Holodomor" theory is absurd.

            only for you...
            Quote: wehr
            Your ancestors were so timid,

            I will not go into your personality due to its imaginary importance, as for the peasants in the USSR, they staged many uprisings against collectivization, more than 40 thousand were shot by their punitive organs request
            Quote: wehr
            it would be enough to point a revolver at them

            VIL had a similar situation, he described it in his article - I recommend it....
            Quote: wehr
            in which both sides had their own truth,

            I agree with this, but history has shown that the Bolsheviks' truth was false, and they were the bloody executioners of the peoples of Russia... hi
            1. +1
              12 November 2024 14: 02
              Are you an organic chemistry specialist? Every commentator is an academician laughing
              Lysine can be synthesized from cyclohexanol, which in turn is obtained from phenol or cyclohexane, and cyclohexane can be obtained by hydrogenating benzene, benzene can be obtained from acetylene, and it can be obtained from methane.
              So it can be done.

              Yes, yes, and they also forced and threatened us into schools and universities, forced us to undergo treatment in hospitals, and even forced us to sit under the light bulb and in front of the TV under the threat of execution. laughing
              1. 0
                12 November 2024 14: 46
                Quote: wehr
                Are you an organic chemistry specialist?

                in some sections, although this question is more about biology - but for you it is difficult.... request
                Quote: wehr
                Every commentator is an academic

                I will refrain from listing my credentials hi
                Quote: DrEng02
                basic education in the humanities?

                Keep silent? Looks like I'm right... bully
                Quote: wehr
                Yes, yes, and they also forced and threatened us into schools and universities, forced us to undergo treatment in hospitals, and even forced us to sit under the light bulb and in front of the TV under the threat of execution.

                It seems like you are a teenager, at least the reasoning... feel
                1. 0
                  12 November 2024 15: 19
                  You can find everything about me on the Internet, both books and articles.
                  And who are you?
                  And it is very convenient to boast about your regalia and competencies, which, most likely, you do not have. laughing

                  Anyone who has both can easily confirm them.
                  1. 0
                    13 November 2024 11: 35
                    Quote: wehr
                    You can find everything about me on the Internet,

                    Quote: DrEng02
                    Keep silent? Looks like I'm right...

                    request
                    1. 0
                      13 November 2024 12: 40
                      Only after the opponent has proven his qualifications.
                      But I suspect that he doesn't have one. He speaks very generally. laughing
                      1. 0
                        13 November 2024 15: 01
                        Quote: wehr
                        how the opponent will confirm his qualifications.

                        Are you so ashamed to say your specialty according to your university diploma? Or do you not have a diploma? I am an engineer-physicist, graduated from the Faculty of Physics and Technology of TPI
                        Quote: wehr
                        But I suspect he doesn't have one.

                        this only speaks about your level of education angry
                        Quote: wehr
                        He speaks very generally.

                        That's my level, you can't reach it... hi
                        If you really want - contact me via PM, I'll give you the author's SPIN code, I hope you know what it is? Or do you prefer orcid?
                      2. 0
                        13 November 2024 15: 05
                        Send me a SPIN code in a private message, I'll read what they write.
                        And here, then "closer to biology", then "engineer-physicist". You should decide on your specialty. laughing
                      3. 0
                        13 November 2024 15: 09
                        Quote: wehr
                        I'll read what they write.

                        and who writes? bully
                        if you need it, write me a PM...
                        Quote: wehr
                        You should decide on your specialty.

                        Quote: DrEng02
                        That's my level, you can't reach it.

                        hi
                      4. 0
                        13 November 2024 15: 15
                        Am I the one who should beg?
                        If you can't prove your qualifications = go to hell with your arrogant statements.
                      5. 0
                        13 November 2024 15: 16
                        Quote: wehr
                        If you can't prove your qualifications = go to hell with your arrogant statements.

                        Quote: DrEng02
                        Are you so ashamed to say what your specialty is according to your university diploma? Or do you not have a diploma?

                        look in the mirror! Any communication is a two-way street... hi
                      6. 0
                        13 November 2024 15: 18
                        You have not confirmed your qualifications in any way.
                        That's why there is nothing to talk about with you.
                      7. 0
                        13 November 2024 15: 18
                        Quote: wehr
                        You have not confirmed your qualifications in any way.

                        Quote: DrEng02
                        I am an engineer-physicist, graduated from the Faculty of Physics and Technology of TPI

                        Lying is not good, however, judging from your opus, for you it is normal... request
    2. 0
      12 November 2024 15: 45
      While other countries collected much more without any battles

      The territory of the USSR is a zone of risky farming! Even the fertile Krasnodar Territory and Rostov Region with Stavropol! And these three regions now grow 20...25% of grain in the Russian Federation.
  4. -3
    11 November 2024 11: 07
    The engineers divided the entire process into separate stages, placed sequentially, which were performed by machines. The web was placed on a conveyor with a pitch of 225 mm, moving at a certain rate.
    Where did you get the machines?
    Did you also design and assemble it yourself? laughing
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +1
        11 November 2024 17: 14
        Quote from Frettaskyrandi
        As for "machine guns", the author lacks even a basic understanding

        "and from them to the stores, from which they were put into place."
        the question is - who installed it? There were no industrial robots - so people...
  5. -2
    11 November 2024 12: 13
    "Red Planeteer "People's Commissariat of War and the Navy Comrade Trotsky" V. Tochinov
    I recommend reading it - this is not an automatic line of course, this is stronger.....
  6. +1
    11 November 2024 12: 21
    This is how we value our own achievements.

    I wonder what the author meant by this phrase? That this line should have been removed first and foremost to the detriment of heavy engineering?
    1. +2
      11 November 2024 16: 48
      The author meant that there is no information about the POST-WAR combine harvester.
    2. +2
      11 November 2024 17: 05
      Quote: Coward
      This is how we value our own achievements.

      I wonder what the author meant by this phrase? That this line should have been removed first and foremost to the detriment of heavy engineering?

      No. Rather, the author is talking about the fact that no effort was made to preserve memory in the USSR. Ships/planes/tanks/cars were crushed, even when it wouldn't have saved anyone (U-2, for example - 3 kilos of iron and 10 kilos of rags with strings). There was an article here with bated breath - that at GAZ they dug up the armored hull of a T-70 tank - it was such a blessing that you... Because besides this armored hull, they only have a MODEL. And that's it... out of 8 tanks produced
  7. +1
    11 November 2024 22: 42
    Quote from Frettaskyrandi
    We won't talk about combines, as for "automatic machines", the author lacks even a basic understanding between such subjects as a production line and an automatic line.
    I am a complete layman when it comes to combines and do not follow this author's publications.
    But from what I read while studying the history of technology development in the USSR, I got the strong impression that in our country there were hundreds of do-it-yourselfers who were capable of literally assembling various technical masterpieces on their knees.

    But the catch was the need to put the production of these masterpieces on stream so that their cost would be at an economically justified level.
    And there were always big problems with this in the USSR. Which caused the need to purchase industrial equipment abroad and attract foreign specialists to create production lines from this equipment.
    What they tried not to report in the general press during the Soviet era
    And what foreign specialists did was often presented as their own achievements.

    Even in the late 60s, for mass production of passenger cars, they were forced to buy a plant abroad, because they themselves were not able to equip it with the necessary equipment and design a conveyor.
    1. 0
      12 November 2024 15: 53
      Even in the late 60s, for mass production of passenger cars, they were forced to buy a plant abroad, because they themselves were not able to equip it with the necessary equipment and design a conveyor.

      And then they ordered stamps for the entire bodywork in Japan.