We will not analyze the specific shortcomings of other social devices today. Let us try to understand one nuance: is democracy really a natural alternative to all other imperfect forms of human society and, if not, what place does it take in their ranks?
Nazism has been recognized as the antithesis of democracy for many decades, although in everyday materials of the “independent media” it is called “fascism” with enviable persistence. It is no coincidence, of course, since not quite stupid workers are kept in the Funds. However, this is a separate nuance.
So let's try to compare the peak of social development with its recognized antipode. Avoiding clichés and myths created for centuries by the lured FUNDS, not only the “mass media” (fig leaf of these Funds), but we will call things by their proper names - MASS PSYCHOLOGICAL DEFEAT.
1.About the "humanism" of democracy.
Nazism manifested - Hitler's Germany - brought death to about 50 to millions of people. Anglo-Saxon democracy went further in this direction: it practically destroyed the population of two continents - North America and Australia (about islands like Tasmania we’ll omit), tens of millions of people in India and other countries in Asia and Africa. Here it is necessary to take into account the tens of millions of victims of the revolutionary terror of democratic coups throughout the world, which are still ongoing. With a shudder, the whole world is following the growth of revolutionary chaos in the Arab world. Democratic attack aircraft are committing particularly bloody crimes today in Syria against its freedom-loving people.
The Nazis sent the civilian population of the captured countries in concentration camps. But they came up with them and the first to use the British Democrats, sharpening the family of Boers, who defended the independence of their state. And on the territory of Russia during the civil war, the same English interventionists also used this democratic invention.
The Nazis killed people in gas chambers. But the American Democrats turned a whole region of the planet, Indochina, into a gas chamber in 60-s.
Even the fascists did not dare to use the means of mass destruction during the hostilities, and the American Democrats dropped two atomic bombs on the rear with civilians in the city with 2 main goals:
- intimidate its geopolitical and ideological rival - the USSR
- justify the financial costs of their creation.
To achieve the first goal, the British Democrats, together with the Americans at the end of the war, turned Leipzig into the ocean of fire, burning two hundred thousand German citizens alive - as many as the Japanese died in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
2. About peace (according to the criterion of weapons mass destruction: in scale and priority).
About nuclear weapons already mentioned. And the biological democrats began to apply a century earlier in order to carry out genocide against the indigenous population of the Americas. They scattered blankets around Indian settlements sown with smallpox pathogens, to which the Indians did not have immunity. As a result, almost everyone died. Eyewitnesses wrote that in such villages, full of dead bodies, one could see only two or three distraught old women completely detached from the world. (Up to the heap, one can remember that the American Democrats paid for each scalp of a murdered native, including children and women. They can still be seen in many local museums in the US).
Democrats were the first to use climate weapons against humanity. For the first time they widely used it in Vietnam, causing artificial torrential rains. And about the termination of their work in the development of this, global in scale, weapons, no statements were not. The probable confirmation of further success may be various climatic disasters that have become more frequent in recent years in various regions of the planet.
And special editions are already writing about tectonic weapons, and God knows what else.
Although the main weapons of mass destruction are "independent media." The damage from the lobotomy that they carry out to the entire population of the planet, 24 hours per day, broadcasting at all imaginable frequencies, is generally immeasurable. Drugs, prostitution, pornography, pederasty, corruption, theft ... and all other vices are widely advertised and inculcated by "independent media" to everyone from birth to death. In this case, the most violent vices bloom precisely in democratic societies.
3. About robberies.
No matter how much the Nazis managed to rob in 7 for years in the occupied territories, all this will be just a trifle compared to the scale that democrats throughout the world have grabbed for centuries, including, incidentally, the formerly looted Nazis. It seems to me that this conclusion does not require detailed explanations.
4. On the severity of crimes.
If you look at the crimes committed in spiritual terms, then democracy looks even worse.
Everyone knows that a person can be killed, but you can bring him to suicide. That is, using cunning and meanness, to create such living conditions for him that he himself will be forced to end his life. The same can be applied to whole nations. We know from the history of our country that the fascists destroyed tens of millions of our relatives. However, they took upon themselves the sin for murder and murder. The democrats managed to create such a life for us, that our people themselves kill their children with their own hands even before their birth, forcing them to take the sin of child-killing on their souls and, thereby, killing themselves. And here the Democrats certainly surpassed the Nazis in bloodthirstiness and meanness.
5. About honesty.
This is best seen when considering the basic democratic myth: democracy is the power of the people. The fact that it is not at all so, very intelligently and intelligibly, in due time, revealed K. Pobedonostsev in the article “The Great Lie of Our Time”. But in short, this myth is debunked by an elementary logical chain of reasoning. The basis of democracy (supposedly - the power of the people) are democratic elections. Who will elect the electorate? - The one who more media is promoted. Who do they push more? - Who will pay the most. Who will pay more? - Who has more money. And who has more of them? - The one who steals more, because it is impossible to earn a lot of money honestly. Much can only be stolen to buy the courts, prosecutors, etc. Neither the current Russian oligarchs, nor the old American ones have earned their capital by miners in Vorkuta or Appalachians. The origin of all big money is a scam or crime. The bottom line on the electoral system is that with the Democrats it brings the most successful of thieves to power (they have more money). So power in a democratic society belongs to thieves.
Conclusion: the real democratic power is the power of criminals, not the people. (Note: Elections, as a social phenomenon, are generally doubtful. As a result of this phenomenon, a person SHOULD SHOULD give up his natural right to control himself, and at the same time the fate of his relatives, including children, to some unknown uncle who knows what plans. Sadly example: elections as the head of the USSR Judas-Gorby; for which the people have already paid tens of millions of lives, not to mention the 90 nightmare. And there’s no one to blame - the people, as it were, chose him, though not by direct elections).
6. About the myth being driven in, that democracy is one thing, and totalitarianism is just the opposite.
Let us recall just one detail from the 9.11 provocation, after which the Democrats declared the right to find terrorists anywhere in the world where they wish. Where are the wreckage of the plane crashing into the Pentagon? .. And how did it happen that kerosene with a burning temperature of 800 ° C provided a floor-by-floor melt of structural steel of twin buildings? The melting point of these steels is 1400-1500 ° C. And all democratic American society is participating in all the plays of the authorities dedicated to this event. This is totalitarianism! Hitler in the coffin is jealous.
Or the democratic European Parliament, which did not recognize the elections in Belarus as legitimate. Organized, amicably and with happy smiles on the faces of the race, the scarves of the separatist flag thrown off by the Belarusian people are tightening around their necks. This is the unanimity. This was not even at congresses of the CPSU. There and with a unanimous vote was full of gloomy faces. And these and facial expressions should confirm their loyalty to the regime. Otherwise, success is not seen.
And not a single independent means was found that would remind that 80% of the population voted for Lukashenko, that this is the people’s choice and not to recognize it is a manifestation of the highest form of xenophobia. And the reason for the European Parliament was simply unkilled: Lukashenko dispersed a bunch of foreign agents going to storm the building of the Government of Belarus. When Yeltsin, in violation of the current Constitution, did not resign, but tanks the legitimate parliament of the country shot, something none of the guardians of the national happiness condemned him and did not say bad words.
Here it is necessary to point out one significant difference between totalitarian and totalitarian and democratic ones. In the first case, we see the brain controlling the process (for example, in the same Nazi Germany, the NSDAP top led by Hitler) and can organize a targeted and therefore effective struggle against this type of totalitarianism, since it has an open character. Democratic totalitarianism is much more dangerous because it is hidden. All normal people have long understood that the authorities of states that promote democracy throughout the world - all these presidents and parliaments - are purely decorative. This gave grounds for reasoning about some kind of power possessing real power and controlling all the decorative figures of representative power in the whole democratic world. She began to be called the world backstage. The bad thing is that we do not have an exact knowledge of those who are specifically included in this backstage and what their final goals are. In addition, we do not know the following: is this backstage the ultimate subject of democratic power on the planet or, in turn, is the next level of pocket puppets?
In any case, the precise coordination of the actions of the democratic forces, which they have been manifesting in all corners of the world over the centuries, is striking. One can only guess: what tough discipline is this achieved?
7. On equality - one of the ideals of democracy.
Since the French Revolution, one of the slogans of democracy is the equality of all people. Ideally, the equality to which democracy seeks is the alignment of all individuals in all rights, when in the social sphere absolutely everything in absolutely everything is absolutely equal. That is, young and old, men and women, healthy and sick, etc. Each of them is an individual, in Greek an atom. But after all, atomized unstructured matter is the chaos from which God created the hierarchically structured Universe. Thus the ideal of the democrats is social chaos, and the vector of their activity is directed in the opposite direction to the works of the creator god. And where are we going with this? Equalizing, by default, is impossible for the most developed individuals. You can equalize only the lowest in development. What happens in life. They equated young and old - and young people no longer give way to old people in transport. They equalized men with women and now, on the one hand, do not give way to women, and on the other hand, without prior arrangement, they introduce quotas for the representation of women in various government bodies, regardless of their readiness to perform their duties. (Serdyukovsky chicken coop or Skrynnik Minister). As a result, the whole society suffers.
Attempts to equalize the healthy and the sick generally lead to the extinction of humanity as a result of degradation. They recognized pederasts just sick, not perpetrators, criminals, and now they enjoy the privileges of hiring, discriminating mentally healthy members of society, receiving quotas to the authorities, demanding to bring up children in schools in their views, making the mental disorder normal. rate deviation, which must be eradicated. Which ultimately leads to the aforementioned degradation and extinction of the entire human civilization.
Moreover: without special advertising, the person is equalized with animals. This is manifested not only in American society, where bestiality is officially already permissible.
This equation goes in other, more subtle ways. The results, however, appear periodically. So repeatedly in the zomboyaschik and other SMPP thundered campaigns in defense of poor stray dogs that are shot. And they say almost nothing about people bitten, crippled, and even slaughtered by these dogs before death.
In Moscow, dogophiles even built a monument to a stray homeless dog nibbled by another dog, which the SMPP repeatedly sounded. But no one even thought how blasphemous it was, considering that the question of erecting a monument to at least one of the hundreds of children stumped up by dogs was not even raised.
For some, the consciousness has changed so much under the influence of the SMPP that they are seriously beginning to argue that the dog is better than man. True, there is hope that the process has not yet passed the point of return, because no one has yet gone to live in a dog pack.
Finishing equality and returning to purely human relations, one can make a very definite conclusion: there is no equality in democracy, since democracy has historically been an extremely slave-owning system: from Hellenistic times to the present day. The only difference is that instead of a scourge to control slaves, their owners use monetary relations, exploiting the slaves even more mercilessly.
One could remember a lot more: democracy is an inexhaustible topic. But the above is enough to make a disappointing conclusion: humanity, in its natural desire for a better and more perfect life, having made its choice in favor of real democracy, made a fatal mistake.
Democracy as a really built and existing system is the degeneration of humanity and its inevitable death. Therefore, it is necessary to fight with all our strength not the strengthening of democracy, but for its eradication. What you need to declare in full voice. It is not too late, the deadly mistake must be corrected.