Why Kazakh Nationalists Don't Like Russia
Modern urban Kazakhs sometimes indulge in nostalgia for the nomadic life as they imagine it
In Kazakhstan, many people do not like Russia and treat Russians, in particular Russians, with disdain. This is expressed in many phenomena, among which we can recall the so-called "language patrols" that swept across Kazakhstan in 2021, when nationalists in a very aggressive form demanded to speak only Kazakh. Such actions were condemned by the President of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev at the XXXI session of the Assembly of the People of Kazakhstan in late April 2022. One of many such examples. But now we are not talking about the facts of the negative and often aggressive attitude of Kazakh nationalists towards Russia, but about the reasons for this.
In my observations, there are strong difficulties in naming the reason for such an attitude, including among Kazakh nationalists. They sometimes refer to the fact that they need to build a Kazakh national state. But if you think about it, their hostility to Russia is completely illogical, since no one has done more for the Kazakhs, their national development and the creation of their national state than Russia.
Thus, a contradiction. Kazakhs have always enjoyed Russia's help, support and even direct participation, but they treat it negatively and even hostilely.
This is so general because, according to my observations, almost all Kazakhs share the idea that their national development should be without Russia, outside of Russia, bypassing Russia, and on this soil a radical wing grows in the form of Kazakh nationalists, who preach hostility almost openly.
There must be a reason for this contradiction. And a very compelling one, even, one might say, obvious. This is of great importance to us, since further development of this idea threatens to turn Kazakhstan into a hostile state, which may, under certain conditions, lead to a forceful resolution of the conflict. Kazakhstan, of course, will not survive. But until it comes to that, we must try to resolve the problems verbally.
My formulation of the reason is this: Kazakhs are unable to recognize their true history, they make up various, extremely idealized and embellished fables about it, believe them as if they were the truth, and then it turns out that the Russians have destroyed their ideal world, a kind of “nomadic Eden” to which they hope to somehow return. This is where the root of hostility grows.
Concentrate of Kazakh national-patriotic popular prints depicting a lost nomadic paradise
Well, now some explanations.
Endless circling across the steppe and backwardness
The cornerstone of this Kazakh worldview is the myth that nomadism is freedom. In fact, there was no trace of freedom here.
And this is the reality of nomadism. The photo is modern, taken in western Mongolia, where Kazakhs still roam
Firstly, a horse is needed in the steppe. A person on foot will not go far; he will not have enough strength and a supply of food and water, especially water, to walk the entire steppe. But even on a horse, you need to know where to go, because a horse needs grass and a clean, fresh watering place. All movements across the steppe are strictly tied to water sources: rivers, streams, springs, wells.
Secondly, a nomad with cattle is also tied to water sources, because the cattle needs to be watered, and to pastures, because the cattle needs to be grazed. So, watering places and pastures are not ownerless, they belong to someone and were generally distributed between the tribes, clans and subclans of the Kazakhs. Each clan or subclans did not move where they wanted, but through the watering places and pastures that belonged to them: from wintering to summering, from summering to wintering. These were ring, figure-eight or loop-shaped routes. The entire Kazakh steppe was, as it were, lined with these rings and loops, along which clans and subclans moved with their households and cattle. They were established for a long time, for decades, and rarely changed. This system was so stable that experts in it could say exactly where a particular clan was at a certain time, whether it was standing in a tract or going to the next pasture.
The life of nomadic Kazakhs was not a free roaming of the steppe, but an endless circling along the same routes, which could remain unchanged for decades and probably centuries. From year to year, all their life from birth to death, from generation to generation.
Of course, I am exaggerating a bit, since Kazakhstan is large and in some areas there were more favorable conditions. But in general, and this applied to most Kazakhs, natural conditions forced the Kazakh nomad to move, because stopping threatened the depletion of forage and watering places, loss of livestock and death.
This had important consequences. The Kazakhs did not accumulate anything except livestock, since the carrying capacity of horses and camels in the economy was always limited.
A wealthy family roams with camels. But even the camels are barely enough to carry the most essential belongings
And this sharply limited their cultural development, since they were, in particular, deprived of the opportunity to accumulate knowledge. You can’t take a library with you. Unnecessary things were thrown out first during any economic cataclysm, which happened periodically, for example, with jute. For the same reason, up until the 1930s, the Kazakhs were a people who were overwhelmingly illiterate, since in their economy there was neither the opportunity nor the sphere of application of literacy. An illiterate people who do not accumulate their cultural achievements will in any case be backward, no matter what natural talents they have. This was determined by geographical determinism in its concentrated form.
Why did the ancestors of the Kazakhs choose the steppe with all the disadvantages and hardships of nomadism? In my opinion, for safety reasons. Good places had to be constantly fought for, and there were no particular contenders on the steppe, because life in the steppe required specific skills. There is nothing for a foot army to do in the steppe, and a cavalry army must know how to move across the steppe. If an enemy who does not know the steppe appears, you can choose not to fight, but to submit verbally, or simply flee for a while to hard-to-reach areas. For this reason, the most terrible enemies of the Kazakhs were the Dzungars, who were nomads themselves.
Mud and cold
In addition to all this, the life of the nomads was very hard and unhealthy, much harder than the life of the Russian peasants. Now the city shala-Kazakhs draw pictures of clean yurts under white felt mats, standing in the middle of a pastoral paradise with tall grass and a couple of horses in the distance.
In fact, the cattle quickly ate the grass in the pasture, especially around the aul, where the young animals were kept, trampled the ground. In dry and hot weather - omnipresent dust. When it rained - the dust turned into sticky mud. In addition to this, manure and droppings, which mixed with mud and dust. In early spring, when the snow had mostly melted, and there was no grass yet, the steppe turned for a time into a kingdom of thick, greasy mud. Such are the natural and geographical conditions.
Cattle next to a yurt
This is a modern photo of Kazakh nomads in Western China. The same thing: cattle, yurts, food utensils - all together and nearby
The situation was made worse by the impossibility of washing and washing clothes. While a Russian peasant almost never went far from water, a river or at least a stream, the Kazakhs often had to leave rivers and live in low-water areas, where almost all the water was spent on watering the cattle. The second reason for the lack of washing was the extreme lack of fuel. There was some, like reeds or saxaul, but not much and not everywhere, so they often used dung or dried manure. This was barely enough for cooking and minimal heating.
In addition, it was almost always cold. Even in summer, cold nights are quite possible, especially in semi-desert areas. At all other times of the year, cold was a constant companion of the Kazakhs. Comfort depended heavily on the quality of the yurt's covering.
Also the reality of nomadism. A small yurt with a rather thin felt mat. And all this for several people.
Only the rich had warm yurts, which they covered with a second felt mat in winter and lined the sides with specially prepared reed mats. The poorer people, whose yurt was worse, with a leaky felt mat, had to freeze. The cold, combined with a shortage of fuel and poor heating, forced them to constantly wear warm clothes, which were worn out to an incredible state. Dust, dirt, sweat from an unwashed body, manure and excrement, and to top it all off, fatty food - this is how the recognizable image of a Kazakh nomad arose, with his unsanitary habits, which could be smelled a mile away.
In both old photos, Kazakhs are wearing warm clothes, despite the summer season.
I would like to point out that these are far from all the “charms” of the traditional Kazakh nomadic life. Today’s urban Kazakhs, even the most ardent nationalists, would not be able and would not want to live in such conditions. And I would like to emphasize once again that such a life is not an indicator of the depravity of the people, but a harsh and insurmountable consequence of those natural and climatic conditions in which the Kazakhs lived for centuries and even millennia, from the time when they learned to live in the steppe. They say that this was about 6 thousand years ago.
It is difficult to verify, since nomads leave almost no traces or archaeological sites behind.
Kazakhs do not recognize their ancestors
Kazakhs, and especially the ideologists of Kazakh nationalism, know all this very well. But we agree that it is very difficult to admit, difficult to agree with. Especially in comparison with Russians.
The Russian steppes were conquered, but in a completely different way. They created small fortresses with grain reserves in convenient places, from where cavalry and even infantry units could operate within a certain radius. The fortresses were located in a line, cutting off parts of the steppes. In order for the nomads to be able to roam in these areas, fenced off by lines, it was necessary to ask permission from the Russian administration. Then the fortresses were transferred to self-supply of crops nearby, then villages arose in the distance, with crops, and so on. A settled area with a permanent population arose. A network of such areas, connected by roads, was thrown onto the steppes. The nomads now found themselves inside this network, and over the years they were increasingly constrained. Already in Soviet times, a great turning point occurred and the general transfer of nomads to a settled way of life, mainly on the basis of a Russian-type economy, with some variations.
That's when you have on the scale your own ancestors in the form of the illiterate and unwashed nomads who were forever circling the steppe, and the newcomers Russians who in a century created in the same steppe a productive economy capable of feeding everyone, that's where a sharp hatred of... Russians arises. In fact, this is an unthinking and unhealed resentment for your ancestors, who turned out to be like this.
This is such a painful issue for the Kazakh worldview that it is carefully disguised and embellished with numerous stories about formidable khans, wise biys, heroic batyrs, primordial steppe justice and other nomadic idylls. These are, in essence, epics, which are no more true than Russian epics. But the Kazakhs believe in them as the truth and demand the same faith from others. They definitely want to escape from their not-so-good-smelling ancestors into these beautiful inventions and are very sensitive and aggressive to doubts about the veracity of these legends.
You can't forbid fooling around with epics. We also had a period of fascination with such folklore. But those Kazakhs who believed in these epics, legends, myths completely and unconditionally, have a different kind of resentment. It turns out that the Russians came and... destroyed their steppe, nomadic idyll. Now that's the basis for hostility.
They may say that Kazakh nationalists have sold out to the West. Yes, conscience can be sold for dollars, but there must be some basis for this. A Kazakh nationalist who takes a bag of dollars from the US embassy must still believe that he is making the right choice, have arguments and a certain logic for this. In comparison with the objective state of affairs, both his arguments and logic are, of course, incorrect, but he himself should not doubt his subjective logic. It is precisely from this consideration that the problem of finding the point at which Kazakh nationalists turn down the wrong path arises, which, judging by the similar experience of Ukraine, can end in a huge cemetery.
It is precisely in my opinion that the myth of the nomadic paradise and in general any embellishment of one's historical past is the very point of turning onto the path of destruction. And in general, as the President of Czechoslovakia Tomas Masaryk said:
"The great cannot be false."
Kazakhs will have to eventually come to terms with the real picture of their people's past, no matter how unsightly it may be, understanding that this is a consequence of a choice made in very ancient, prehistoric times, and a special, very unfavorable set of natural and climatic conditions from which it was impossible to escape without outside help.
Information