"Little ones" for the "gray wolves"

20
"Little ones" for the "gray wolves"
Submarine XXIII series goes on a campaign


History German "electric robots" are not limited to the ocean-going submarines of the XXI series. The Nazis did not plan to use large boats in small seas; special submarines were designed for this work. At the same time, technical innovations were to be implemented on them, as on ocean-going submarine cruisers... The Walter engine was no exception. Along with the XVIII series, the XVII was designed - with the same turbine on concentrated hydrogen peroxide, but with a much smaller displacement. Subsequently, the capacity of the steam-gas turbine was cut in half, and the project of the XXII series of boats was obtained. And in the same way, after it became clear that the Walter turbine "does not take off", they were redesigned for a conventional diesel-electric power plant, resulting in the submarines of the XXIII series.




The first "babies" of the Third Reich - submarines of the II series

The first German small submarines designed for action in the Baltic and North Seas were the U-boots of the II series. They fought well in 1939-1940, but then the submarine war was transferred to the Atlantic, and the "babies" were not welcomed, and their construction was stopped in 1940. But by 1943 the idea of ​​using small submarines was again in the air.

Let's start with the fact that the Kriegsmarine had new theaters: the Mediterranean (where the Italian allies had previously operated) and the Black Sea. Sending submarines there via Gibraltarian was too expensive, and the decision naturally suggested itself to create submarines that could be transported by rail, if not entirely, then at least in parts, with subsequent assembly on site. And with the English fleet In the North Sea, fighting with VII-series submarines became... expensive: the British had raised anti-submarine defense against them to the level of an exact science, so losses were off the charts.


Grand Admiral Dönitz on the cramped bridge of a Type XXIII submarine

The proposal to design small submarines was made to Grand Admiral Karl Dönitz by the designer of the XXI series Olfken in June 1943. "Papa" supported the proposal, but set two conditions: the new boat should be armed with standard seven-meter torpedoes (instead of the shortened 5,5-meter ones, which were planned to be used on the small boats of the XXII series), and it should be able to be transported by rail. And the work began to boil, especially since the A. Grimm design bureau was given a little more than a month for everything...

However, the rapid design of the boat was facilitated by the fact that many of its parts and mechanisms had already been well developed by the German industry. In order not to be unfounded, I will only mention that the six-cylinder diesel MWM RS134S with a capacity of 575 horsepower was developed as a diesel generator for the Bismarck-class battleships, the AEG GU4463-8 propulsion electric motor with a capacity of 572 horsepower was the engine of the most common submarine in the Reich submarine forces, the VIIC series, and the storage battery was half of the AB of the older sisters - the U-boots of the IX series. Where else the BBC CCR188 sneaking electric motor with a capacity of 35 horsepower was used, I personally could not find, but surely the pragmatic Germans did not copy it out of thin air...


General drawing of the "baby"

The submarine that resulted from the work of German designers had a surface displacement of 234 tons, an underwater displacement of 275 tons, a length of 34,7 meters, a midship width of 3 meters, an average draft of 3,6 meters, and a height of 7,7 meters. For comparison, the Soviet submarines of the M "Malyutka" type had a maximum (there were five series of Malyutkas, which differed significantly in their performance characteristics) surface displacement of 208 tons, an underwater displacement of 258 tons, a length of 45 meters, and a midship width of 3,5 meters. What the "German" was much better at was its diving depth - the operating depth of the XXIII series was 180 meters, while the maximum for the "malyutka" was 60 meters... The surface speed of the "mini-electric robot" was 9,7 knots, and the underwater speed was 12,5 knots. The Soviet "baby" demonstrated more traditional characteristics in this regard - underwater speed of 7,8 knots, surface speed of 14 knots (however, all submarines from the Second World War, except for the German "electric robots", had a surface speed higher than the underwater speed).


Torpedo compartment of the mini-"electric robot"

The torpedo armament of the submarines was identical - two torpedo tubes in the bow. Moreover, if the first "babies" and the entire XXIII series did not have spare torpedoes, then the last series of Soviet small submarines already had spare torpedoes and the ability to reload the torpedo tubes. By the way, on the German submarine, reloading was carried out in an original way (approximately like in the Soviet joke about how our tonsils are torn through the anus): torpedoes were inserted directly into the torpedo tubes from the outside, for which the aft ballast tanks were filled with water until the torpedo tube covers were visible above the water. Yes, not only the French know a thing or two about perversions...


Nothing extra - the highest class of hydrodynamics of the 40s

Artillery The XXIII series boats did not carry, moreover, as in the case of the XXI series, the designers tried to minimize the number of protruding parts in the light hull - for the sake of good underwater hydrodynamics. Incidentally, this was a legacy from the XXII series boat project, with the "Walter turbine" they were supposed to have a fantastic underwater speed of 20 knots for those times.


Bow section of the XXIII series submarine

The boat's robust hull had the same figure-8 cross-section as the XXI series, in which the smaller, lower loop of the figure-4 was used to install the battery. The hull was assembled from four sections: aft, engine room, central post (combined with living space) and bow. Unlike the ocean "electric robots", whose sections were transported by barges, the sections of the small "electric robots" were transported by rail.

Compared to the XXI series boats, the small boats had significantly reduced electronic equipment. The XXIII series submarines did not have an active sonar, nor did they carry a radar. Guidance during torpedo firing was carried out as on the old VII and IX series boats. But a plexiglass cap was installed over the boat's bridge, which significantly reduced the unpleasant sensations of the upper watch in stormy weather. The habitability of the boats was... so-so, however, this concerned any small submarines, Soviet and English ones are no exception.

Initially, it was planned to build boats for the North Sea and the Baltic at the Deutsche Werft shipyards in Kiel and Gotenhafen, the Germania shipyard in Kiel, and the Howald Werke in Kiel and Hamburg. For the Mediterranean, boats were to be assembled at the Arsenal plant in Toulon and the Ansaldo shipyard in Genoa, and for the Black Sea... in Odessa! More precisely, at first they planned to build them at the Marti plant in Nikolayev, but the Red Army was advancing so quickly that the mouth of the Dnieper was no longer a safe place for the Germans. However, by the time the construction of the series began, Genoa, Toulon, and Odessa had become... irrelevant. So - only Germany!

The decision to build was made by Dönitz on August 5, 1943. The Deutsche Werf in Hamburg was chosen to begin construction: it was convenient in that the sections did not need to be shipped far - they were riveted nearby, in Finkenwerder (and it was decided to abandon the construction of the XX series transport boats, so production capacity was freed up).

According to the construction plan approved on December 6, 1943, it was planned to build 140 submarines of the XXIII series, of which 60 in the Mediterranean, 15 in the Adriatic, 15 in the Black Sea. The enormity of the plans, as usual, was broken by the actions of the Allies. Not only were the Mediterranean, Adriatic and Black Seas no longer a priority, but also armadas of Allied bombers regularly visited Hamburg, greatly interfering with the work. At a meeting in February 1944, it was said that due to the bombing, the delivery dates for parts for small submarines were postponed to March, and the delivery of the first boat itself - to December 1944. However, the Germans used the free time to make changes to the project: another 2,2-meter-long section was added, as a result of which the bow compartment became less cramped.

The first submarine, U-2321, was launched on April 17, 1944, on the birthday of a mediocre Austrian artist (yes, the Germans loved painting...). It was planned to build hundreds of these boats, but in reality it was necessary to "cut the sturgeon" significantly - 61 submarines of the XXIII series entered service, another 4 boats were 95% ready. Some of the boats were supposed to have a protective coating "Alberich" on their light hulls, consisting of two layers of sound-absorbing rubber. But in reality, only two submarines that entered service managed to be equipped with the coating. True, almost all the boats had their snorkels covered with porous rubber - this reduced their radar visibility.

Operating small boats was a real pain in the ass: they had very little buoyancy (10,5%), so when submerged they sank like a stone. On the one hand, this was convenient, since it allowed for a quick dive in case of danger, on the other... Sometimes, when starting to dive, a submarine of the XXIII series forgot to stop. So, during an emergency dive, the crew of U-2326 managed to stop only at 106 meters - they barely swam out... After the war, this boat was handed over to the French, they were much less lucky - during a dive, it sank near Toulon, taking the lives of 17 submariners.


It's spring 1945, and they're giving the Nazi salute...

However, unlike the XXI series boats, the small "electric boats" showed their best side in the last months of the war. Not a single one of them was lost during combat missions (seven submarines of this series were lost in harbors, during tests and passages). The first to go on combat patrol was U-2324, on January 18, 1945. The boat returned home without any problems, but also without any catch. The first sinking of an Allied vessel was attributed to U-2322: under the command of Senior Lieutenant Fridtjof Heckel, it sank the coastal vessel "Egholm" on February 25, 1945. On April 5, 1945, the coastal vessel "Gesray" was sunk by U-2321. The last merchant ships sunk by submarines during World War II were U-2336, under the command of Lieutenant Commander Emil Klussmeyer. She sank the ships Senland I and Avondale Park in the Firth of Forth on 7 May 1945. The latter ship was sunk at 23:03 - 57 minutes before Germany's official surrender.


The ending was a bit predictable...

After the war, most of the new German submarines (those that the Germans themselves did not manage to sink) were sunk by the British during Operation Dead Light - the Limeys did not want the revolutionary German U-boots to enrich the shipbuilding schools of the former allies.


H-31, formerly U-2353

Nevertheless, the USA and the USSR managed to recapture one each. Another pair was raised from the bottom in 1957 by the FRG - they entered the Bundesmarine under the names "Pike" and "Akula". In the Soviet Navy, the submarine U-2353 was named H-31 ("H" - German), later - M-31, from 1946 to 1948, specialists from the Central Research Institute of Military Shipbuilding worked closely with the boat, conducting full-scale tests, the results of which were later used in the development of domestic diesel submarines. She was scrapped in 1952.


The Swedes also got a XXIII series submarine after the war.

In general, oddly enough, the experience of operating the XXIII series submarines was much more positive for Germany than the ocean "electric robots". By the time they went on combat patrol in the ocean, the Allies' dominance was close to absolute, and in the coastal zone the new U-boots had a chance. And they used this chance...
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    5 November 2024 05: 27
    tonsils are torn through the anus): torpedoes were inserted directly into the torpedo tubes from the outside, for which the aft ballast tanks were filled with water

    So what? The torpedoes on our "Malyutkas" were loaded in exactly the same way. There is no other way, given their miniature size.
    1. +6
      5 November 2024 09: 11
      And this was the case not only with the Germans, but also with us and the French. In all fleets, on small boats where spare torpedoes were not provided, this method was used. There were even special devices that accelerated and simplified the charging process. Where is the photo of such a device lying around on the computer. But, there is no torpedo loading hatch. A very complex design and dangerous, in terms of the strength of the hull.
    2. +3
      5 November 2024 09: 39
      Our latest series of little boats already had spare torpedoes...
      1. +8
        5 November 2024 11: 10
        Our latest series of little boats already had spare torpedoes...

        There were never any spare torpedoes on the "Malyutkas". On the last, XV series, 4 torpedo tubes were installed, and not 2, as on all previous series.
        The diagram is below, opens on click.
      2. +4
        5 November 2024 15: 33
        And there were only 4 of them on the last series of "babies" ... I remember on the small German submarines of WWI type A there were 3 or even 5 torpedoes ... and all our pre-war and military "babies" had 2 torpedoes ... "babies" of post-war construction and "babies" of military construction that did not have time to take part in military operations had 4 torpedoes
  2. +7
    5 November 2024 07: 42
    Thanks to the Author, interesting article.
    The Germans came up with a good idea, but it was too late. If these boats had appeared 3-4 years earlier, who knows... Especially if the Germans had made large electric boats of the 21 series.

    Comparing electric boats with our Malyutkas is not very correct - the boats are of different generations.
    1. +6
      5 November 2024 08: 14
      Absolutely right! But they couldn't have appeared earlier: the series was developed based on the experience gained during the war, so three years earlier the Germans would have received something... More traditional.
    2. +3
      5 November 2024 11: 23
      Comparing electric boats with our Malyutkas is not very correct - the boats are of different generations.

      For reference, it was on the "Baby", which received the nickname "lighter" in the navy, that systems similar to the Walter schemes were tested.
  3. G17
    +13
    5 November 2024 08: 40
    It is a pity that "Military Review" has degenerated into such "historical" articles, which belong in the "yellow" press. The comments to the photographs are incomparable - starting from "Grossadmiral Dönitz on the cramped bridge of a XXIII series submarine" (where there is no trace of Dönitz) and ending with "The Swedes also got a XXIII series submarine after the war". The author is not even aware that the application of yellow or white stripes to the conning tower did not mean the Swedish flag, but was a designation of the training status of the submarine, just as the yellow or white stripe applied to the bow was a sign of quick identification for Luftwaffe pilots. Even in the title picture, which depicts U-2363, the submarine is by no means leaving on a campaign. This is May 1945, when the submarine had already surrendered to the Allies, as evidenced by the black flag and the number already applied by the Allies to the conning tower, which the Germans never did. And there was no rank of senior lieutenant in the Kriegsmarine, but there was Oberleutnant zur See. And the whole article is full of such blunders and fantasy.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +7
        5 November 2024 15: 36
        By the way, the presence of minus votes confirms my comment. The current contingent of the site considers the content secondary.
  4. +2
    5 November 2024 08: 50
    Interesting article, thank you. A question arose, if the torpedoes were reloaded from the outside, then where were they stored, if inside the hull, then extracting them is probably also a real pain in the ass. And there are no containers visible from the outside. Or were they stored in the overhang behind the wheelhouse?
    1. +3
      5 November 2024 09: 41
      There were no spare torpedoes there, just like on our first series of "babies". Perhaps they would have appeared later, but the Reich ended...
    2. +2
      6 November 2024 04: 49
      The torpedoes were stored in the tubes and only there. There was no way to extract them inside the hull at all - the length of the compartment was not enough. The rear covers of the tubes were needed for only three purposes:
      1. For maintenance of torpedoes (like connecting ventilation hoses - bleeding hydrogen from the batteries...);
      2. To leave the boat in an emergency;
      3. For working with mines (they were placed 2-3 pieces in the device; the back one was secured with a chain, which had to be unfastened after the front one was placed; how it was in the case of the presence of a middle one is interesting to me)
  5. +5
    5 November 2024 09: 37
    Hmm ...
    4 sunken transports for 7 submarines lost due to technical reasons is a good ratio...
    If we fight for the Allies.
    1. +4
      5 November 2024 11: 08
      From April 1944 to the end of the war, they managed to build 61 boats plus another 4 almost finished, a total of 65 pieces!!!! This suggests that small ships are much easier to build and modernize than large ones, and they serve as large ones, if not longer. An example of 6 French submarines Rubis built in 1976-1993, 4 are still in service, 30-37 years old, and not all of them are sailing.
      1. +2
        5 November 2024 19: 26
        agond, my dear (darling), I understand that autumn is the time..., but let me ask you, how many submarines have you designed or built for the Navy? In which country?
        In 2023, the following were decommissioned: the Pacific Fleet's Project 667 BDR submarine Ryazan, and the Northern Fleet's Project 941 submarine Dmitry Donskoy. The fleet accepted the first submarine in 1982, the length of the submarine is 155 m, and the fleet accepted the second in 1981, the length of the submarine is 173 m. Since 1984, the Northern Fleet has been serving the Project 667BDRM submarine Verkhoturye, the length of the submarine is 167,4 m.
        This does not mean that a "small fry" like the Project 971 submarine, for example the "Bratsk", could not serve as the "Panther".
        This means one thing: the State Duma of the Russian Federation, the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, together with the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the glorious Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation and the very glorious Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation, very likely work for the IMF, and not for the Russian Federation.
  6. -2
    5 November 2024 17: 03
    In my opinion, the Germans are constantly stepping on the same rake - there is no need to make submarines of small displacement and waste resources on it - they did not show themselves in WW1 - and they turned out to be ineffective in WW2 - when creating projects for electric submarines, the Germans went to 2 extremes - either the 21 project is too large a displacement - why use an electric submarine in the ocean - or 23 is too small - it would be smart to build one type of electric submarine with a displacement of 400-500 tons
    1. 0
      5 November 2024 17: 33
      700-800 tons, like the sevens in their prime
      1. 0
        5 November 2024 17: 34
        Non-sevens are almost oceanic submarines
    2. -1
      6 November 2024 20: 34
      You can't even look at their destroyers without shuddering.
      The largest, with the largest caliber, with a boiler-turbine installation that has no analogues in the world, as well as the lowest cruising range and seaworthiness only slightly better than that of the Italian "poets"...