Military Review

Perspective MLRS MCL, or About quantity and quality

In February, the international exhibition of weapons and military equipment IDEX-2013 was held in Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates). She did not remember any major contracts or a unique exhibition program. Despite all the efforts of the organizers, the salon was never able to reach the level of world leaders. At the same time, the defense industry of the UAE presented one project at IDEX, which immediately attracted increased interest. The MCL multiple launch rocket system, which was first demonstrated, immediately became a subject of discussion.

In general, the appearance of the new MLRS caliber 122 millimeter has long been no particular reaction. Many countries have similar systems, and each new one immediately gets the label “another one”. As for the Emirate MCL, it has one characteristic feature that determines its appearance and differences from the existing combat vehicles. The fact is that the engineers at Jobaria Defense Systems (JDS) decided to set a record in the area of ​​salvo size. To this end, they supplied the new MLRS with more than hundreds of tubular guides for unguided rockets. You can imagine what effect will have only one salvo of one such combat vehicle.

The MCL (Multiple Cradle Launchers) combat vehicle is assembled on the basis of an Oshkosh HET truck tractor with an 6x6 wheel formula and a five-axle semi-trailer. The truck and a number of trailer units have anti-bullet and anti-fragmentation booking, which allows the use of a combat vehicle in war conditions. The American-made Oshkosh HET tractor is equipped with a Caterpillar C18 diesel engine with 700 horsepower. With such a power plant, the tractor is able to tow a trailer weighing up to 65 tons. Based on this, it is possible to draw some rough conclusions about the total mass of the MCL installation. Probably, the HET tractor was chosen not only because it was possible to put armor on it, but also because of its characteristics.

Apparently, all the fire control systems are installed in the cab of the tractor. According to the available data, the crew of the combat vehicle has an automated complex for determining its own coordinates and calculating guidance angles. It consists of inertial-satellite navigation system, ballistic computer and instrumentation control mechanisms. Among other things, the fire control system provides for the possibility of firing only from selected guide packages. Thus, the operator-gunner of the MLRS MCL can regulate the power of a volley in a fairly wide range.

An armored box with an auxiliary power unit is located in the front part of the semi-trailer, above the pivot of the fifth wheel coupling. As far as is known, it ensures the autonomous operation of all electric and hydraulic systems of a combat vehicle. The main part of the semi-trailer platform is occupied by four launchers. Each of them is mounted on its own turntable and can be raised to the required angle of elevation with the help of two hydraulic cylinders. The tilt-and-lift mechanism serves as the basis for three blocks with guides for rockets. Each of all 12 of such units of the machine incorporates on 19 (20) starting “pipes”. Stabilization of the semi-trailer when shooting is provided by six outriggers. The semi-trailer itself is hung on them, and the tractor remains on the ground.

Strangely enough is associated with the number of guides for unguided missiles. история. At the IDEX-2013, two MCL machines were exhibited. At one of them, which took part in demonstration performances, there were no middle guides in all blocks in the second row from the bottom of all the blocks. Because of this, there was evidence that the machine can transport and use up to 228 missiles at the same time. The second copy of the new MLRS was in the static exposition and all the guides were in place. Thus, its ammunition increased to 240 rockets. The reasons why 12 guides were not immediately installed on one of the machines have not yet been announced.

As the ammunition for the MLRS MCL, Roketsan TR-122 122-millimeter unguided rockets of Turkish design are used. According to available information, the company Roketsan and JDS have agreed on the subject of licensed production of missiles in the United Arab Emirates. TR-122 unguided rockets are designed for firing from 10 to 40 kilometers. The 65-kilogram shell with a length of slightly less than three meters is equipped with a high-explosive fragmentation warhead with a contact fuse. Each rocket carries an 6,5 kilogram of an explosive mixture based on RDX and TNT, which tears up the body of the warhead on 2000-2500 splinters. The rocket is guaranteed to hit targets within a radius of at least 20 meters. The Roketsan TR-122 family of missiles also contains ammunition with a warhead equipped with ready-made attack elements (5500 metal balls) and with a cluster. In the latter case, each unguided projectile carries fifty cumulative fragmentation combat elements and several incendiary ammunition. It is not yet known which types of TR-122 family of missiles were supplied to the United Arab Emirates and the production of which was deployed there.

The use of Turkish ammunition led to an interesting version regarding the structure of the MCL launcher. Although this version has not yet been confirmed and not refuted, it is worth considering. The latest modifications of the Turkish RSZO T-122 Sakarya, intended for the use of TR-122 missiles, do not have their own guides for ammunition. Before shooting, the calculation of the complex with the help of a crane of the transport-charging vehicle installs two units with rockets on the combat vehicle. These blocks are composed of transport-launch containers with missiles on 20. The unit is charged at the factory, then sealed and delivered to the troops. After making a salvo, the waste block is removed from the machine and disposed of. Its reuse is not provided. The use of identical missiles and a similar launcher structure (several blocks of 20 guides) led to the appearance of a version regarding the use of disposable missile blocks on the MCL. As already mentioned, this information is not officially confirmed, but at the same time it looks plausible enough.

To ensure combat work, a separate transport-loading vehicle is part of the MCL complex. It is mounted on the same base as the combat vehicle, but at the same time it is equipped with a crane and places for the transportation of missiles / rockets with rockets. It is argued that the full recharge of all 228 / 240 guides takes no more than an hour, which may speak in favor of the version about the use of ready-made blocks with ammunition. In addition, the advertising materials presented at the exhibition can be considered indirect evidence of this version. According to representatives of the company JDS, has already developed a version of the MLRS MCL, designed for firing Turkish TR-300 missiles of 300 caliber of millimeters. Such missiles with a trajectory correction system are capable of delivering a warhead to a distance of up to one hundred kilometers. It is worth noting that when using rockets of larger caliber, the MCL ammunition is reduced by more than an order of magnitude. At each launcher of the complex, two blocks of two transport and launch containers with missiles are mounted. Thus, MCL can attack enemy targets at a shorter distance, using all 228 / 240 missiles, or firing on, but sending only 16 missiles to the target at the same time.

According to Jane's Defense Weekly magazine, the MCL multiple launch rocket system has already entered service with the United Arab Emirates army. Prior to the exhibition in Abu Dhabi, the front units had time to get several such complexes. As we see, the command of the UAE army sees meaning in the creation and operation of such systems. However, experts and amateurs of military affairs are not inclined to greatly praise the MCL complex and greeted him with noticeable irony. First of all, the monstrous dimensions of the new combat vehicle were criticized. With all its advantages in terms of freight, the lengthy semi-trailer has a very specific cross-country ability. Obviously, the MCL combat vehicle will be able to move only along the roads, perhaps even along dirt roads. Rough terrain, in turn, will be impassable for it, or at least very difficult to move.

The second minus of this concept concerns the "concentration" of weapons. Battery conventional MLRS when firing spreads over a certain area. MCL, having firing possibilities similar to a small battery, can be disabled by one or two hits. To destroy the battery of "classic" systems of salvo fire, you will have to spend much more ammunition, and during the return fire several vehicles are guaranteed to leave the position. Thus, low survivability in a combat situation is added to the lack of permeability. Problems with permeability and survivability can have a tangible impact on the ways of applying the new MLRS. Moreover, they can put an end to possible export supplies. Therefore, it is very likely that the MCL complex will be procured only by the UAE army.

And still the question remains: if the MLRS ML is not suitable for cross-country movement and has very low chances of surviving counter-firing, then what tasks, other than advertising and exhibition ones, will be posed to it? Judging by the possibilities, the new MLRS can only get out of position if the enemy has no serious modern aviation and artillery. This fact, combined with the driving performance of a combat vehicle, directly speaks of the counterguerrilla nature of the possible use of MCL. During the Middle East military conflicts of recent times, the formation of insurgents almost did not have serious artillery weapons, and all the main battles took place in or near cities. Thus, the MCL multiple launch rocket system is adapted to fire at the rebel positions and destroy their objects. In the event of a strike by two hundred missiles, the camp or fortified position will be completely destroyed, and the military-technical backwardness of the enemy will not allow him to deliver a retaliatory strike in time or even to find out where the MCL system fired.

Thus, although MCL is unlikely to be able to work with sufficient efficiency in a full-fledged war with a serious adversary, it is quite capable of exporting. In recent years, several armed insurgencies have occurred in several countries in the Middle East and North Africa. Systems like MCL might be useful in such conditions. So in the very near future, the new MLRS can be exported. However, the commercial prospects of this system of salvo fire look ambiguous, if not to say strange. With similar performance with several combat vehicles like the BM-21 “Grad”, the MLC is more difficult, heavier and more expensive. In addition, her tactical niche is small and therefore a potential buyer must first think whether he needs such a combat vehicle and, if so, in what quantity.

At the present time, one cannot rule out such a scenario, in which only a few copies of the MCL complex will be produced and all of them will remain in the army of the United Arab Emirates. As part of the armed forces of this country, the machines will begin to expend their resources by participating in exhibitions and demonstration maneuvers. Because of its specific tactical niche, the MCL systems will only be useful if a poorly organized and poorly armed opponent appears. Will the Emirates have a similar enemy? It is difficult to speak with confidence. Probably, the command of this country does not exclude such a variant of further events.

On the materials of the sites:
21 comment

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site:

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Zerstorer
    Zerstorer 11 March 2013 10: 06
    Article +. But I categorically do not understand why we are recording any not entirely successful example of military equipment in counterguerrilla weapons ?! There are samples that are specially created for this. And so it is possible to write tactical nuclear weapons in counterguerrilla. Bang! and there are no partisans either, as well as everything else.
    1. Petrix
      Petrix 11 March 2013 10: 52
      Because to fight against a weak opponent, tk. high vulnerability to heavy weapons. If carriers of tactical nuclear weapons have the same survivability characteristics, then they can also be written in counterguerrilla.
  2. Reddragon
    Reddragon 11 March 2013 10: 11
    A machine designed to cover large spaces and with a "zhahnul and run away" tactics.
    1. Zerstorer
      Zerstorer 11 March 2013 10: 51
      Quote: RedDragoN
      A machine designed to cover large spaces and with a "zhahnul and run away" tactics.

      Wither, let it wither. But to run away on such a trailer ...
    2. Petrix
      Petrix 11 March 2013 10: 55
      Quote: RedDragoN
      with the tactic "zhahnul and ran away"

      just the same - "Zhahnul and remained" under the cover of more maneuverable means of defense.
  3. new nutella
    new nutella 11 March 2013 10: 27
    I argued with one comrade about this apparatus ... I will convey the essence of his thoughts ".. this system is not worse than the Tornado, and in some ways even better, but they cannot be compared."
    After these words, I thought that to continue the argument, well, really .....
  4. Follow us
    Follow us 11 March 2013 11: 01
    Rather, this thing is good to use for mining.
  5. Perchik
    Perchik 11 March 2013 11: 26
    xs why such firepower is needed ....
    point-blank I do not observe conflicts of this level, wherever it is useful :)

    I see this installation as a serious fire argument in protecting narrow sections of borders and possible enemy strike directions.
    but subject to serious air defense cover.
    1. Yarbay
      Yarbay 11 March 2013 11: 59
      Quote: Perchik
      I see this installation as a serious fire argument

      I have a question for specialists, if this installation is not very mobile, is it not easy to allow four usual Sakarya installations to be placed nearby and hit in one gulp, will it be much more mobile and quickly curl up ??
      mine inefficient development!
      1. Lopatov
        Lopatov 11 March 2013 12: 31
        In addition, four ordinary ones are more convenient to recharge.
      2. Dimka off
        Dimka off 11 March 2013 14: 38
        I think so too. If or or I would choose our 6th Grad.
        1. Yarbay
          Yarbay 11 March 2013 15: 14
          Quote: Dimka off
          I think so too. If or or I would choose our 6th Grad.

          Although in the desert it seems far undead to hide!
          Perhaps for desert conditions and suitable!
  6. datur
    datur 11 March 2013 12: 31
    Hmm-wunderwafer, she is the wunderwafel !!!! laughing
    NAPOLEON 11 March 2013 13: 07
    the firing range is small such a turret will be detected immediately. On the platform there are 4 installations, but the video shows that the missiles do not start from each at the same time, but in turn, which increases the time of the volley from one to fly from the other.
    1. Lucky
      Lucky 11 March 2013 19: 44
      You can install on the train there is even more space, useless stuff!
  8. Phantom Revolution
    Phantom Revolution 11 March 2013 14: 25
    Wunderwaffle, which under normal aviation will be spotted and quickly destroyed.
    Gorazda only against the Papuans.
  9. Dimka off
    Dimka off 11 March 2013 14: 42
    I, too, am of the opinion that this system is certainly powerful, but not necessary. Better to put a dozen Grads or Hurricanes than a couple of these. It seems to me that without good cover, she will be an easy target. Yes and not everywhere will pass. And you can use it only in desert areas.
    1. Iskra
      Iskra 11 March 2013 22: 48
      DDoS attack on Iron Dome clearly spotted
  10. Drosselmeyer
    Drosselmeyer 11 March 2013 19: 25
    Probably such a shaitan-arba the Arabs decided to test the strength of the "Iron Dome" of the Israelis)). 240 missiles at a time will be tortured to intercept.
    1. Lucky
      Lucky 11 March 2013 19: 45
      Here’s someone who, after Israel’s first salvo, will bomb this system with its Air Force!
    2. Iskra
      Iskra 11 March 2013 22: 51
      DDoS attack on the "Iron Dome", it will be fun, the Arabs love to be weird.
  11. fweadcSZ
    fweadcSZ 12 March 2013 00: 39
    It seems to be so bad, but no, we have to do worse. The authorities do not cease to amaze. This site just recently came across: where information about each of us has been posted publicly. I don’t know why to do this, but it personally scares me. Nevertheless, I somehow managed to delete my data, though I had to register, but no one could "dig up" anything on me.
  12. Cpa
    Cpa 12 March 2013 01: 44
    But will the Papuans intercept this installation, or will the battalion be assigned to it with army aviation? It also seems to me that for remote mining it was still gone, and if it goes on roads, so the Papuans will bookmark it on the road, and the whole war. laughing
  13. qwert
    qwert 12 March 2013 07: 05
    If you crave for Israel .... And then the crew in jeeps and winding ... Even if after one salvo they bomb the unit for a hairdryer, then Israel can be ravaged in a couple of weeks. After all, each rocket of the iron dome is more expensive than the entire installation of the MLRS.

    If you crave for Israel .... And then the crew in jeeps and winding ... Even if after one salvo they bomb the unit for a hairdryer, then Israel can be ravaged in a couple of weeks. After all, each rocket of the iron dome is more expensive than the entire installation of the MLRS.
  14. alex86
    alex86 14 March 2013 22: 06
    Yes, just the sheikhs wanted to show off, like the more, the steeper. Nobody thought about expediency, such is my opinion.
  15. Fregate
    Fregate 28 March 2013 17: 04
    It looks impressive, but asphalt rollers should go to the kit to go to it, because it only seems to be possible to drive along the highway on it.