Andrei Vlasov in the service of the Third Reich

47
Andrei Vlasov in the service of the Third Reich
Photos from the case of General Vlasov


В previous article We talked about the origin of A. Vlasov, his quite successful military career in the pre-war years and at the beginning of the Great Patriotic War. This article will tell how Vlasov took the path of betrayal, his service to the Nazi authorities of Germany, his attempt to escape to the American sector, the inglorious end of the life of this traitor and his accomplices.



The way to the Germans


Historians still argue about Vlasov's motives for betrayal and the time when he decided to surrender. Some believe that he made his fateful choice even before the final catastrophe of the Second Shock Army. While surrounded, he allegedly cursed Stalin and the Headquarters in impotent rage for abandoning him, "the best general in the country" (as he considered himself), to his fate and doing nothing to evacuate him. And so he decided to take revenge - to go over to the German service. Indeed, unlike other soldiers and officers of the Second Shock Army, for some reason he went not to the east, but to the west. And when meeting the Germans, he did not try to introduce himself as an ordinary officer or even a soldier, but immediately gave his real name and military rank. However, other historians point out that Vlasov did not go to the Germans immediately, but only two weeks after the liquidation of the remnants of the Second Shock Army - on July 12, 1942. Were you hesitating, not knowing what to do? Or were you hoping to sit it out in the forest and then get in touch with the partisans?

Another question: why did General Vlasov, who had surrendered, cooperate with the Nazis? Was he afraid of the hardships of life in a concentration camp and even possible violence from the Germans? Did he no longer believe in the possibility of defeating Germany? Or was he an ideological enemy who, with his transfer to German service, received the opportunity to take revenge for his humiliation before his superiors and commissars? In his "Open Letter" he claimed that it was precisely in the encirclement:

“I have finally come to the conclusion that my duty is to call upon the Russian people to fight for the overthrow of the Bolshevik government, to fight for peace for the Russian people, to end the war for foreign interests that the Russian people do not need.”

And later he even came out with a call to “follow Lenin’s path” — to use the war to “liberate the people and the country from the Bolshevik regime.” He said that during World War I, Lenin and Trotsky retained power by entering into separate negotiations with the Germans and making significant concessions. And he would enter into an agreement with Hitler and “buy peace from Germany,” giving it the Baltics, Belarus, and Ukraine. In his “Open Letter” of March 3, 1943, Vlasov wrote:

“I call them (the Russian people) to the path of brotherhood and unity with the peoples of Europe, and first of all to the path of cooperation and eternal friendship with the great German people.”

Moreover, the excessively ambitious Vlasov seriously expected to enter history as "the liberator of Russia from the Bolshevik yoke", to appear on the pages of textbooks as a "fighter for democracy" and to stand in the same row with the Decembrists and Herzen. He believed in these fantasies so much that even in May 1945 he said that grateful descendants would not forget his "services" to Russia.

It is known that in 1942, Foreign Ministry adviser Gustav Hilder actually met with Vlasov and discussed the possibility of his participation in a puppet government of Russia that would "officially hand over" the territories of Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltics to Germany. However, in the summer of that year, the situation at the front was favorable for the German armies, and the negotiations were curtailed.

Another question: when exactly did Vlasov decide to go over to the side of Hitler and the Third Reich – even before he surrendered? Or did he waver later, unable to resist the temptation to exchange a concentration camp for a German general’s salary (six thousand Reichsmarks a month) and a comfortable mansion in Berlin? The debate continues, but the fact of Vlasov’s betrayal is obvious, and where and when the general made this decision is probably not very important.

German interest in the Vlasov case


And how could A. Vlasov be of interest to the German General Staff and intelligence? For three months he was in the encircled army and therefore, naturally, all the information he had about the plans of the Soviet command was hopelessly out of date. He could have given a characterization of the Red Army generals he knew, however, given his ambition and self-conceit, it can be assumed that it would have been of a derogatory nature and would have created a false impression of the incompetence of the Soviet commanders.

Vlasov himself clearly counted on cooperation with the top leadership of the Third Reich as the creator and even head of the anti-Bolshevik government of Russia in exile – nothing more and nothing less. And his ambitions were to be supported by an entire army recruited from Soviet prisoners of war. However, Hitler and his closest associates did not take Vlasov’s claims seriously; moreover, they treated him with undisguised contempt. Thus, it is known that Himmler called him a “runaway pig” and a fool, and Hitler – a “man from the quagmire”. For a long time, Vlasov was considered only an instrument of propaganda. Of course, there could be no talk of equal cooperation between the “high-bred” Aryans and the “Untermenschen” Slavs, and Vlasov “complained” to Soviet investigators in 1946:

“Until 1944, the Germans… used us only as a signboard that was advantageous to them… Our participation in all these (military) affairs even in 1945 hardly exceeded 5 percent”

And Vlasov himself was forced to “play” by the Nazi rules; when a Russian orderly dropped a tray with vodka glasses, he declared to his German guest:

"Please excuse me, this is an Untermensch."

However, Frau Bielenberg, the widow of a high-ranking SS officer, who was acquainted with Himmler himself and yearned for “male affection,” condescended to close communication with Untermensch Vlasov and even became his lover.

Career of a traitor


So, Lieutenant General Vlasov, who had surrendered, was sent to the Prominent camp near Vinnitsa, where captured generals, colonels and officers of the General Staff were held.


A. Vlasov in a prisoner of war camp, first days in captivity

Here he very quickly and easily established contacts with representatives of German intelligence and the Department of the General Staff of Foreign Troops in the East. He signed the first leaflet compiled for him by the Wehrmacht Propaganda Department on September 10, 1942. And on September 17, he was transferred to Berlin, where Vlasov met the former brigade commissar and member of the Military Council of the 32nd Army G. N. Zhilenkov and the former battalion commissar M. A. Zykov, who had previously gone over to the German side.


Zykov and Zhilenkov with German officers on the far right. Photo taken between 1942 and 1944.

These traitors would become loyal collaborators of Vlasov. Zhilenkov would later be hanged in Moscow on August 1, 1946. But Zykov, because of his Jewish origins, would be secretly arrested and killed by the Gestapo in 1944. In the meantime, all three of them composed the so-called "Smolensk Appeal", published on January 13, 1943. It was printed in a print run of three million copies, and leaflets with it were dropped from airplanes over the positions of Soviet troops. German sources claim that this "appeal of the Russian Committee had an extraordinary success, especially in the middle and northern sectors of the front. Divisions of Army Groups Center and North reported an increase in the number of deserters."

Representatives of the headquarters of these groups of troops invited Vlasov to the front to speak to prisoners of war and the civilian population.

On March 3, 1943, Vlasov's already cited open letter "Why I took the path of fighting Bolshevism" was published. The Nazi curators were so pleased with their protégé that they recommended him for the award of the "For Courage" badge for citizens of the Eastern peoples, 2nd class - Vlasov received it on April 23 of the same year. But he was denied the creation of his own army: Hitler himself, at a meeting at headquarters on June 8, 1943, declared that this was a "first-class fantasy"; Germany only needed Russian slaves who would work for free both in German families and in the factories of the Third Reich. Vlasov, in the Fuhrer's opinion, was needed only at the front lines, and he should act only "with his name and his photographs." But the first "Russian battalions" had already begun to form - now they were disarmed.

"Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Russia" and "Russian Liberation Army"


In 1944, the situation changed, and the situation at the front forced the German leadership to reconsider its views on the use of units made up of Soviet prisoners of war. Especially since Vlasov continued to lie with inspiration and make unrealistic promises. For example, he told Himmler on September 16, 1944:

"Mr. Minister! I know that today I can end the war against Stalin. If I had a shock army made up of citizens of my fatherland, I would reach Moscow and then end the war by telephone, talking to my comrades who are on the other side."


Andrei Vlasov and Heinrich Himmler, cover of the German magazine "Signal"

By this time, the German leaders were already in the position of drowning men clutching at straws, and therefore allowed Vlasov to begin the formation of the so-called Russian Liberation Army (ROA).


ROA Commander-in-Chief A. Vlasov in the Dabendorf camp near Berlin

But first, on November 14, 1944, the creation of the Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Russia (KONR) was announced in Prague. Collaboration with it proved fatal for many weak-willed Soviet prisoners of war and civilians forcibly taken to the territory of the Reich.

The Manifesto of the Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Russia stated:

"Humanity is experiencing an era of the greatest upheavals... The forces of imperialism, led by the plutocrats of England and the USA, whose greatness is built on the oppression and exploitation of other countries and peoples... the forces of internationalism, led by Stalin's clique, dreaming of a world revolution... are covering up their criminal goals with slogans of defending freedom, democracy, culture and civilization... Two years ago, Stalin could still deceive the peoples with words about the domestic, liberating character of the war. But now the Red Army has crossed the state borders of the Soviet Union, broken into Romania, Bulgaria, Serbia, Croatia, Hungary and is drenching foreign lands with blood... The goal of the Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Russia is:

a) The overthrow of Stalin's tyranny, the liberation of the peoples of Russia from the Bolshevik system;
b) Ending the war and concluding an honorable peace with Germany;
c) Creation of a new free people's state without Bolsheviks and exploiters.

Compatriots, brothers and sisters in Europe! Remember that you are now working for a common cause, for the heroic liberation troops. Multiply your efforts and your labor exploits!"

Participants of this forum later recalled that it ended in a grand drinking bout, during which “people fell to the floor and fell asleep.” The Baltic German Sergei Froelich (born in 1904 in Riga), who was appointed as a liaison officer under Vlasov, claimed:

"This licentiousness was due to desperation. We all understood that this initiative came too late."

The core of the forming 1st division of the Russian Liberation Army (ROA) was the infamous brigade of SS-Brigadeführer Bronislav Kaminsky. This unit is also known as RONA – “Russian Liberation People’s Army”. In 1941-1943, Kaminsky’s subordinates burned 24 villages in the Bryansk and Vitebsk regions, killing more than 10 Soviet citizens, 203 of whom were burned alive. And on August 5, 1944, Kaminsky’s brigade carried out a terrible massacre in the Warsaw district of Okhota (15 civilians died). An eyewitness recalled his first impression of these punishers:

"A wild horde of armed and unarmed people dressed in a motley uniform poured out of the carriage. Among them were women covered in jewelry, and the officers, who were as dissolute as most of the soldiers, had three, four, five pairs of watches on their hands."


B. Kaminsky in the photo on March 21, 1944.

S. Bunyachenko, the former commander of the 389th rifle division of the Red Army who went over to the German side and was now appointed commander of the First Division of the ROA, which included Kaminsky’s brigade, did not hesitate to call his subordinates bandits, robbers and murderers.


S. K. Bunyachenko

Meanwhile, on January 28, 1945, Vlasov received the post of commander-in-chief of the armed forces of KONR; the command of two divisions was officially transferred to Vlasov by the German inspector general of “volunteer units” E. Kestring on February 10.

The commander of the 2nd regiment of the First Division of the ROA V. Artemyev recalled that everyone already understood the “uselessness of their struggle against the communist regime,” but they had high hopes for the Americans, who would supposedly provide asylum to every participant in the “Liberation Movement.” Even then, many soldiers and officers tore off German emblems from their uniforms, but the official order from the OKW to replace them with ROA insignia followed only on March 2 – the KONR forces were given the status of an army of an allied state.


Vlasov in front of a line of ROA soldiers

The true attitude of the Germans towards the Vlasov "government" is evidenced by the Soviet military engineer P. N. Paliy, who was in captivity. According to him, when asked by officers of the First Division of the ROA about what relations would be between Russia and Germany after the war, the German General Kestring answered:

"Everything west of the Urals will be under German control, everything to the east will be entirely yours."

It should be noted that this happened in February 1945 – such was the degree of adequacy of some of Hitler’s fanatical supporters.

Combat operations of the ROA


In 1944, some ROA units were sent to the Western Front – the Wehrmacht leaders did not dare send them into battle against the Red Army, fearing mass desertion. These units encountered American troops, whose command, having found out that they were Russian, generously offered the traitors to surrender, guaranteeing... a return to their homeland. The Vlasovites understood perfectly well how they would be met in the USSR, and they were afraid not only (and not so much) of the Chekists, but of the ordinary soldiers, who, as a rule, shot them on the spot – and the officers were far from always able to stop them (however, it must be assumed that they did not try too hard to protect the traitors). Front-line artilleryman Mikhail Kano claimed:

“None of us were interested in the reasons why the former Red Army soldier began to serve the Germans, whether for ideological reasons or to avoid dying of hunger in a prisoner of war camp.”

He also described an incident when a column of captured Vlasovites was literally crushed by the Soviets before his eyes. a tank. The driver-mechanic was later court-martialed, but his actions did not evoke the slightest condemnation from the witnesses of this incident. Frightened by the prospect of returning to their homeland, the Vlasovites began to put up such stubborn resistance to the Allies that they greatly embittered them; the Americans then very willingly and without any ceremony sent them to the Soviet Union in whole trains and steamships. They did not stand on ceremony with the "refuseniks": they were dragged out of the church by the hair (August 12, 1945, Kempten), sleeping pills were mixed into their coffee (Fort Dick, New Jersey), sleeping gases were used.

And on April 13-14, 1945, Vlasovites entered into battle with units of the Soviet Army (First Belorussian Front) for the first and last time. Bunyachenko's 1st Division stormed Soviet positions on the Oder, but suffered a defeat. Two days later, on April 15, contrary to the orders of the German command, it moved south to surrender to the Allied forces.

The inglorious end of an army of traitors


On May 1, Bunyachenko's division approached Prague, and on May 4, an uprising broke out in the city. The SS troops were ordered to destroy the city, and then the Czechs turned to the ROA. The Germans did not expect a blow in the back and began to leave the city. After this, the newly created Czech government announced to the Vlasovites that it had never asked them for help, and that the representatives of the Prague Uprising headquarters who entered into negotiations were impostors and adventurers who had no authority.

The Czechs advised the Vlasovites to surrender to the Red Army units approaching Prague. As a result, on May 7, Bunyachenko's division resumed its movement south. At that time, German troops still remained in Prague, and they finally capitulated to the Red Army units only on May 11. And on May 9, Bunyachenko's retreating division met with a tank unit of the American army. After negotiations on the terms of surrender, it folded on May 11. weapon and was stationed in the Shlisselburg area. On the same day, another high-ranking Vlasovite, Major General Meandrov, surrendered the ROA headquarters and the remnants of the 2nd division to the Americans.

On May 12, the Americans informed the Vlasovites that Shlisselburg was part of the Soviet occupation zone, and panic broke out among the traitors. About 10 Vlasovites tried to leave Shlisselburg in small groups and individually, but the Americans later handed over almost all of them to representatives of the Soviet authorities (including Bunyachenko). Several hundred fugitives fell into the hands of Czech military units, who also did not stand on ceremony with them: ROA Major General Boyarsky was shot, staff officer Shapovalov was hanged, Major General Trukhin and other Vlasovites were handed over to representatives of the Soviet troops. Another 10 soldiers and officers of the 1st ROA Division remained in Shlisselburg and were handed over en masse by the Americans to their Soviet allies.

Arrest of A. Vlasov


On April 13, the day of the inglorious battle of the 1st ROA Division with the Red Army, Vlasov finally entered into a legal marriage with Frau Bielenberg in Karlsbad. It is hard to believe, but from that moment on this lady began to call herself the ruler of Russia (!).

On April 18, Vlasov's representatives entered into unsuccessful negotiations with the commander of the 7th American Army, Patch, and then the Swiss authorities refused to grant political asylum to the traitor.

On May 11, Vlasov arrived at the location of Bunyachenko's division. On May 12, 1945, Captain M. I. Yakushev's reconnaissance group, with the tacit consent of the Americans, arrested the traitor in front of Bunyachenko and the soldiers of his disarmed division. Vlasov's translator, Ressler, describes the last attempt at negotiations with the Americans:

"Vlasov went towards the American tanks. I went with him... We approached the Americans. They were grinning, chewing gum, not reacting to Vlasov's words... They put us in a car."

During the search, thirty thousand Reichsmarks were confiscated from Vlasov; it is difficult to say where he was going to pay with them. On May 15, 1945, A. Vlasov was taken to Lubyanka. The first court hearing for him and 11 high-ranking KONR and ROA figures opened only on July 30, 1946.


Vlasov in the dock, 1946.


Vlasov and other KONR leaders during their trial, 1946.

The investigation lasted more than a year, and the accused fully admitted their guilt. On July 31, they were all sentenced to death, the sentence was carried out on August 26, 1946.

Attempt to rehabilitate traitors


In 2001, the Main Military Prosecutor's Office received a petition asking for a review of the case of Vlasov and his accomplices and his rehabilitation under the law on victims of political repression, and it was submitted by representatives of the clergy. You won't believe it, but the charges of anti-Soviet agitation and propaganda were dropped, and this part of the sentence was overturned due to the lack of corpus delicti! But Vlasov and other members of the ROA were still denied full rehabilitation.

However, a careful study of the situation reveals that at the time of filing this appeal, Vlasov and his accomplices had already been formally rehabilitated based on the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, which in 1992 overturned all repressive sentences of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks), duplicated by the Military Collegium. And therefore, Vlasov and 11 activists of KONR and ROA can be considered innocent. Such are the sad consequences of the coup d'etat carried out on December 7, 1991 in Belovezhskaya Pushcha by Yeltsin, Kravchuk and Shushkevich. And the inaction of the current authorities, who turn a blind eye to this outrageous and seemingly incredible situation.
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    13 October 2024 05: 55
    Frau Bielenberg - widow of a high-ranking SS officer
    Even after the war, she tried to get a pension for herself as the widow of a general. wink
  2. +6
    13 October 2024 06: 01
    Himmler called him a "runaway pig" and a fool, and Hitler called him a "man from the quagmire."

    Even the "new owners" despised this scum.
  3. +14
    13 October 2024 06: 09
    The article is missing only one thing: a photograph of Vlasov and others on the gallows.
    1. AAK
      +1
      13 October 2024 13: 29
      But Vlasov, in my opinion, is still hanging on the far right, they circled the wrong one, Vlasov’s figure is too characteristic...
      1. 0
        13 October 2024 13: 35
        What's the difference. One of these.
  4. +10
    13 October 2024 06: 21
    I don't want to dwell on the twists and turns of the traitor's fate and the nuances of the Nazi past. I'll draw your attention to the last paragraph of the article (for brevity, I'll hide it under a spoiler):

    Can the inaction of the current authorities be considered an omission due to lack of thought or should it be perceived as a planned, biased political line against the USSR?
    We have a document, the guarantor of which is the president himself, and it states:

    The change of the Constitution, flag, coat of arms, anthem... The disguise and hushing up of the true attributes and symbols of the Soviet Union - weren't these the reasons that allowed the "liberals" to raise their heads, for whom the ideas of a socialist state are worse than a noose around their necks?
    1. -5
      13 October 2024 07: 55
      Quote: ROSS 42
      appeals Vlasov and his accomplices had already been formally rehabilitated based on the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, which in 1992 overturned all repressive sentences

      How could it be otherwise? Under what flag did the Vlasovites fight (see fig.), and whose flag flies over the country?
      1. 0
        13 October 2024 09: 26
        Quote: Boris55
        How else?

        Well, you don't need to explain anything...
      2. +1
        13 October 2024 17: 57
        And there is also the St. Andrew's flag, what to do with it?
        1. 0
          14 October 2024 07: 33
          Quote: suhorukofal
          And there is also the St. Andrew's flag, what to do with it?

          "State symbols and state sovereignty":
          https://vp-sssr.ru/works/gosudarstvennye-simvoly-i-gosudarstvennyy-suverenitet
          1. -2
            14 October 2024 15: 09
            How does this relate to the nonsense that you identify the modern flag with Vlasov's? The tricolor was used for centuries in the Russian Empire, and who is Vlasov? The leader of the country, he approved it for the country, what does he have to do with it? You are like the Ukrainian patriots who love to rush around with insults towards our country. Their favorite thing to do is to chat about the flag.
            1. -1
              15 October 2024 07: 37
              I wrote in a private message, I will duplicate it here.

              You will first get acquainted with this information - about the heraldry of flags. How and why it arose. Why different states have different flags, what they mean: "State symbols and state sovereignty": 

              https://vp-sssr.ru/download/works/14/gosudarstvennye-simvoly-i-gosudarstvennyi-suverenitet.pdf

              Starting from page 215, it is about the Russian state flag. It also says something about Vlasov's rag.
              1. -1
                15 October 2024 10: 33
                Zadornonovshchina in full swing. Everything is clear with you, there is no point in talking to such a lover of modern history.
                1. 0
                  15 October 2024 14: 57
                  Quote: suhorukofal
                  There is no point in talking to such a lover of modern history.

                  If you had just skimmed through it, you would have probably noticed the pages (see fig.) If for you 1910 is a new fad, then - oops.

                  If you are not satisfied with the pictures from old books, then you have problems...
                  1. -2
                    15 October 2024 16: 46
                    Don't be petty, there are still drawings from the times of Ancient Rus, and you can also identify this Zadornovism with the sources of those times.
  5. man
    +14
    13 October 2024 06: 23
    From a family of poor people, to whom the Soviet government gave everything, he became the most vile traitor of the Great Patriotic War... okay, Yeltsin, the descendant of a kulak...
    Strange thing life ...
    1. 0
      13 October 2024 06: 42
      Mann, you read my mind. I thought the same thing.
  6. +6
    13 October 2024 06: 29
    Thanks a lot to the author. I read it with pleasure. And the topic is interesting...
  7. +3
    13 October 2024 06: 40
    The position of Vlasov's "justifiers" is surprising. Do they really think that everyone has forgotten everything?
    1. man
      +7
      13 October 2024 06: 45
      Quote: Alex 1970
      The position of Vlasov's "justifiers" is surprising. Do they really think that everyone has forgotten everything?

      Unfortunately, time works against those who remember... sad
    2. +5
      13 October 2024 08: 22
      Unfortunately, now more than half of the country does not know who Vlasov is. And if you say that he is a general executed in the USSR, then he will automatically be considered an innocent victim. This is very sad. Who could have imagined 40 years ago that Ukraine would have a fascist regime led from the USA? And in truth, war begins when the previous one is forgotten.
    3. +1
      13 October 2024 09: 02
      Well, the enemies of the USSR justify the collaborators of the Civil and Great Patriotic Wars and their seizure of the USSR by the fact that they all wanted to “liberate” the Soviet people from the communists.
    4. +6
      13 October 2024 11: 09
      Quote: Alex 1970
      The position of Vlasov's "justifiers" is surprising. Do they really think that everyone has forgotten everything?

      But Kolchak, the executioner of Siberia, was practically acquitted, and there is a monument in Irkutsk, and Irkutsk beer "Almiral Kolchak"... So everything is possible....
  8. +5
    13 October 2024 07: 02
    Of course, Vlasov was not an ideological anti-communist. He held on to the Reichsmarks that no one needed until the very end. It was more pathological greed that usually borders on cowardice and betrayal.
    1. +6
      13 October 2024 07: 54
      Vlasov was certainly not an ideological anti-communist.
      As a communist, he was just a member of... the party... And he spoke beautiful words at party meetings.
  9. +2
    13 October 2024 07: 40
    The betrayal of Vlasov and other generals like Zhilenkov and Zykov only testifies to the fact that Stalin's purges in the ranks of the pre-war Red Army were not just justified, but necessary. Stalin simply came to his senses too late and did not have time to put all potential traitors to work before the Great Patriotic War. They were good at disguising themselves. By the way, today in Russia such people are called "waiters". Those were waiting for the Germans to arrive, and these are waiting for the Americans and Ukrainians to arrive.
    So, if Stalin had not managed to purge the Red Army of thousands of Tukhachevskys before the Great Patriotic War, the trouble would have been even greater. But he did not manage to purge the thousands of Vlasovs, he did not notice them. By the way, the current commander-in-chief also started the purge of the generals late and perhaps has not noticed them all yet. Well, those corrupt waiters...
    1. +1
      13 October 2024 08: 48
      I think I agree. In the ROA, the head of the Air Force was a certain Maltsev, a former colonel of the Red Army. In 1938, he was arrested on suspicion of participating in an anti-Soviet organization. In 1939, he was released, it was not possible to prove his participation / hello to those idiots who insist that the NKVD could beat anything out of anyone / He was appointed to manage the Red Army Air Force sanatorium in Yalta. After the Germans arrived, he reported to the commandant's office and voluntarily offered himself for service.
  10. +12
    13 October 2024 07: 52
    You will not believe
    Why is that? The anti-Soviet state dropped the charges of anti-Soviet propaganda, quite logically. That is why we have more tears for the "patriots" Denikin, Wrangel, Ataman Semenov and the rest than for General Karbyshev. Torture and abuse did not break the will of the communist, the ardent fighter for the liberation of the peoples of the world from the fascist yoke.
  11. +3
    13 October 2024 08: 06
    By sending Vlasovites and policemen to camps, the Soviet government actually saved them from the people's wrath. And then, when the real wounded veterans began to die, many Vlasovites and policemen quietly began to apply for veteran pensions and benefits. And some of them still sit in the presidiums on May 9, accepting congratulations, gifts and flowers. One of them, sentenced to 10 years for treason, was recently constantly flashing on television, invented the myth that Stalin fell from his horse during the Victory Parade rehearsal and that's why Zhukov took over the parade, and even got on one of the postage stamps dedicated to the Great Patriotic War.
  12. +7
    13 October 2024 08: 41
    Certainly an interesting story. I was tormented by one question - who in 2001 submitted a petition for Vlasov's rehabilitation? I started digging in the literature and was taken aback! The initiator of Vlasov's rehabilitation was the Russian Orthodox Church! In the person of Hieromonk Nikon, the head of the "For Faith and Fatherland" movement. Personal confessor of a certain Dmitry Rogozin. But the Russian Orthodox Church abroad went further and honors the memory of Vlasov as a great martyr.
  13. +2
    13 October 2024 09: 10
    And according to the cowardly “logic” of the enemies of the USSR, which they are constantly trying to convince me of here, there is no difference between General Vlasov and General Karbyshev on the grounds that both of them were members of the Communist Party of the USSR.
  14. BAI
    +4
    13 October 2024 10: 44


    And on April 13-14, 1945, Vlasov’s forces entered into battle with units of the Soviet Army (First Belorussian Front) for the first and last time.

    If this is the first battle, then where did the captured Vlasovites come from before?
    1. +2
      13 October 2024 15: 33
      All sorts of Einsatzkommandos and other rabble in the service of the Germans.
  15. -2
    13 October 2024 11: 09
    Why mention this traitor again? A pawn with general's epaulettes. We don't see the main problem behind Vlasov. 800000-1200000 Hiwis alone. Khrushchev rehabilitated the punishers and accomplices and they quietly joined peaceful life (with a negative . Well, and if someone is cooler. Pavlov Meretskov (and the like) - who are they?
  16. +3
    13 October 2024 11: 33
    "Vlasov met with the former brigade commissar and member of the Military Council of the 32nd Army G. N. Zhilenkov and the former battalion commissar M. A. Zykov, who had previously gone over to the German side." Dear author! In the USSR, I heard from every iron that the Germans shot commissars and Jews immediately upon capture. The rank of battalion commissar is major. You don't know why the Germans left battalion commissar Zykov alive?
    1. VLR
      +4
      13 October 2024 12: 12
      Probably German pragmatism: they decided that Zhilenkov and Zykov would be useful for propaganda purposes for a while, but they could always shoot them. In the end, the Gestapo did the same with Zykov in 1944 - he did not live to see his arrest and trial.
    2. 0
      13 October 2024 12: 17
      He got there as a private. But he sang like a nightingale. And if according to Zykov, 99 percent of the time he was sent
    3. 0
      14 October 2024 16: 52
      Quote: Tests
      Dear author! In the USSR I heard from every iron that the Germans shot commissars and Jews immediately upon capture. The rank of battalion commissar is major.

      I immediately remembered "There can't be Nazism in Ukraine - their president is a Jew!". smile
  17. -11
    13 October 2024 12: 46
    There is not and can never be any justification for the traitors Vlasov and Vlasovites.

    Moreover, to the Vlasovites of both WWII and WWI:
    During World War I, Lenin and Trotsky retained power by entering into separate negotiations with the Germans and making significant concessions. And he will enter into an agreement with Hitler and "will buy peace from Germany”, giving it the Baltics, Belarus and Ukraine.

    What he only planned, the Lenins did in reality in Brest, selling FOREVER a third of European Russia to the German occupiers in exchange for maintaining power.

    The Bolsheviks' hopes for an uprising of the German proletariat were not justified. According to Rosa Luxemburg,
    remained "motionless as a corpse"
    Just like in WWII

    It was NOT the Bolsheviks who destroyed Brest, but the allies, and only by their victory in WWI in 1918 over the aggressor.

    Treacherous calls
    "The revolutionary class cannot help but wish for the defeat of its government" and "The transformation of war into civil war
    treacherous and remained
  18. +5
    13 October 2024 13: 23
    Dudin and Ilyin justified him. They wrote about him in the analyses.
    As the "patriotism" of the authorities, who changed their tune on the fly, abates, new attempts at rehabilitation are entirely possible.
  19. +3
    13 October 2024 14: 07
    On May 11, Vlasov arrived at the location of Bunyachenko's division. On May 12, 1945, the reconnaissance group of Captain M. I. Yakushev, with the tacit consent of the Americans, arrested the traitor in front of Bunyachenko and the soldiers of his disarmed division.
    ,,,some documents of those times. ZhBD 25 TK, and 162 TBR.
    1. +2
      13 October 2024 14: 13
      Vlasov's translator, Ressler, describes the last attempt at negotiations with the Americans as follows:
      ,,,strange of course, according to the documents of the 25th TC, personal translator Ressler was captured on the 15th. Or was he not there when Vlasov was captured or? What? It is not clear request
      1. +4
        13 October 2024 14: 41
        On May 12, 1945, Captain M. I. Yakushev's reconnaissance group, with the tacit consent of the Americans, arrested the traitor in front of Bunyachenko and the soldiers of his disarmed division. Vlasov's translator, Ressler, describes the last attempt at negotiations with the Americans:


        On May 11, 1945, the 162nd Tank Brigade, commanded by Colonel Mishchenko, established that the 1st Vlasov Division and its headquarters were located in Brezh and the surrounding area of ​​Brezh.
        At 16.00:12 on May 1945, 162, Colonel Mishchenko tasked the commander of the mechanized battalion of the 1nd tank brigade, Captain Yakushev, to go to the location of the XNUMXst ROA division and take Vlasov and his staff and the division commander Buyanichenko prisoner.
        South of 2 km of Brezh, Captain Yakushev met the commander of the 2nd battalion of the 3rd regiment of the 1st division of the ROA, Captain Kuchinsky, who pointed out that a column of passenger cars with the division headquarters, where Vlasov himself was located, was moving ahead.
        Captain Yakushev overtook the column in his car and blocked the road with his car.
        In the first stopped car, division commander Buyanichenko was found, to whom Comrade Yakushev offered to follow him, but Buyanichenko categorically refused.
        At this time, Vlasovite Kuchinsky informed Captain Yakushev that Vlasov was in the same column.

        After the first inspection of Comrade Yakushev did not find Vlasov, but one of the drivers of the convoy showed the car in which Vlasov was located.
        Approaching Vlasov’s car, comrade Yakushev found himself hiding behind a blanket and obscured by the translator and the woman Vlasov who were sitting in the car.
        At the order of Comrade Yakusheva got out of the car and followed him to the headquarters of the 162 TBR Vlasov refused, explaining his refusal by the fact that he was going to the headquarters of the American army and was located at the disposal of American troops.
        Only under the threat of the execution of Comrade Yakushev forced to get into Vlasov’s car. On the way, Vlasov made an attempt to jump out of the car, but was detained.
        Following to the location of the brigade headquarters, comrade Yakushev met Commander Brigade Comrade Mishchenko. Comrade Yakushev handed Vlasov to Colonel Mishchenko.
        Vlasov, in a conversation with Comrade Mishchenko, again stated that he had to go to the headquarters of the American army.
        After a short conversation, Comrade Mishchenko brought Vlasov to me at 18.00:12 on May XNUMX.
        Commander of the 25th Tank Corps, Guards Major General FOMINYKH
        Chief of Staff Colonel ZUBKOV


        TsAMO RF. F. 236. Op. 2727. D. 30. L. 180-182. Original.
  20. Alf
    +3
    13 October 2024 20: 52
    with American troops, whose command, having discovered that they were facing Russians, generously offered the traitors to surrender, guaranteeing... their return to their homeland.

    Frightened by the prospect of returning to their homeland, the Vlasovites began to put up such stubborn resistance to the allies that they made them very embittered;

    They overdid it...
  21. 0
    14 October 2024 17: 36
    What I noticed.
    Describing the second part of Vlasov's "adventures", the author is quite emotional, regularly adding the epithet "traitor", showing his attitude towards this man. But in the first part, when talking about Vlasov's successful career, he is quite reserved, about his command at the beginning of the war he simply does not tell, rushing "to the top". The beginning of the article is dedicated not to Vlasov at all, but to modern realities.

    Dear author, we, who were brought up in the USSR, already know very well about Vlasov and the Vlasovites after his betrayal. The most interesting thing for us is how successfully he commanded as a Soviet general, his real role in the defeat of the Germans near Moscow, the attitude of the top leadership towards him. So was the "traitor Rezun, who praised Vlasov", right in describing Vlasov at that time or not?
    "The 20th Army really did advance very successfully, and Solnechnogorsk was taken by December 20. But this advance took place practically without Vlasov's participation." So, Comrade Stalin, when he promoted Vlasov and awarded him the Order of Lenin, didn't know what he was doing? Or, if "traitor Rezun" praised him, then this topic can't be developed further?
    I don’t understand why, when describing the biography of a person who committed a crime, it is impossible to normally describe (including in a positive light) those periods of his life when he was still a normal person.
    It's the same as completely rightly despising the current Pugacheva, slandering her songs of the period when she was a normal singer. Although, many are doing exactly that now.
    Unfortunately, the topic “What led a talented (or not?) military leader (or not?) to betrayal?” is not addressed.

    (P.S. I read your other articles with pleasure. They are clearly more impartial.)
    1. P
      0
      1 November 2024 21: 49
      Perhaps the author is afraid of parallels with the modern military-political leadership of the Russian Federation, which in the early 90s betrayed its oath and duty and went over to the enemy almost in its entirety
  22. P
    +1
    1 November 2024 21: 46
    It is rather strange to call oneself a supporter of democracy and at the same time fight against the country of the Soviets. Yes, already castrated by the formation on the territorial principle, yes, disarmed, but still quite active