US is producing plutonium cores for warheads again

12 465 26
US is producing plutonium cores for warheads again
Model of plutonium core and means for storage and transportation


The US is resuming production of plutonium cores, which are needed to assemble strategic nuclear warheads. weapons. Recently, one of the nuclear industry organizations successfully completed the production of the first such product from a new batch and successfully passed all the necessary tests. Now this core is being transferred to another enterprise, which will use it in the assembly of a real warhead.



Recent successes


In the early 2010s, the US military and political leadership assessed the state of its nuclear industry and came to the conclusion that it needed to be urgently restored. It was necessary to re-master a number of technologies and establish the production of various products and devices. The result of this process was to be new warheads for strategic weapons.

Over the past several years, the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and its affiliates have been working hard to meet their goals. They have repeatedly reported small accomplishments in the past, and now they proudly announce that they have completed a major milestone.

By now, the organizations involved in the project have fully restored their plutonium core manufacturing capabilities. The main production site is located at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and the Kansas City National Security Enterprise are also involved in the project in varying roles.

On October 1, NNSA announced that the first core of the new batch had been completed at Los Alamos. It had passed all the necessary tests and received all the required documents. After that, the core was sent to Kansas City, where it will be installed in the W87-1 warhead, intended for the advanced missiles.


W87-1 warheads on the LGM-118A missile's warhead

It is noteworthy that this is the first plutonium core for a warhead manufactured since 1989. Its appearance is a major milestone in stories American nuclear industry. In essence, we are talking about restoring critically important production, without which the prospects for the development of US strategic nuclear forces remain uncertain.

Plans for the future


NNSA has already revealed some rough plans for the future, although it has not released all the details. At this point, we are only talking about initial achievements, and the nuclear industry organizations will have to work long and hard to realize all the planned goals.

The first core of the new release has already been delivered to the plant, where it will be used to assemble a full-fledged warhead of the W87 Mod 1 type. The timeframe for completing this work has not yet been announced.

In the next decade, the emphasis will be on developing and expanding production. By the mid-thirties, it is planned to increase it to 50 cores per year. Then a new plutonium processing plant will begin its work, which will allow for an even greater increase in production rates. By the end of the next decade, it is planned to produce 80 cores per year.

The plutonium cores of the new series will be used to update the arsenals. In the near future, they are planned to be installed on the W87-1 type warheads intended for new ICBMs. It is expected that reaching the production rate of 50-80 cores per year will allow all existing warheads to be updated in a limited time frame and the ICBMs on duty to be re-equipped.


Breeding stage for LGM-30

In the future, the development and production of new types of warheads is not ruled out. What they will be like and what cores they will require is still unknown. But it is already clear that these activities will become possible, in particular, thanks to the restoration of plutonium core production. NNSA will be able to produce cores and related products of any required configuration, corresponding to the requirements of the customer and a specific project.

Technical aspects


The plutonium core is a fairly simple product. It is a simple sphere of plutonium-239, the mass of which is less than the critical mass. Depending on the design of the nuclear warhead, this sphere can weigh up to 10 kg and have a diameter of less than 100 mm.

The core is placed in a warhead and equipped with means to initiate a chain reaction. When the warhead is triggered, the core substance begins to divide, releasing a huge amount of energy.

The new cores will be used in the W87-1 warheads. These warheads will eventually become the main equipment of the new generation LGM-35A Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missiles.

The history of the modern W87 Mod 1 block dates back to the early eighties. At that time, the Livermore National Laboratory created the W87 Mod 0 warhead, intended for the prospective MX-type ICBM, which later received the index LGM-118A Peacekeeper.


Minuteman missile liftoff

In 1986, the W87 Mod 0 charge was developed based on the serial W87-1. It featured a more advanced design and increased power. This warhead was planned to be used on future MGM-134 Midgetman missiles. However, in 1992, the development of the Midgetman was stopped, and the W87-1 project was archived.

The finished warhead project was remembered only in 2019, when the development of the new generation LGM-35A ICBM began. It was decided to modify the W87-1 product using modern solutions and technologies, and then use it on the new missile.

There is no precise information about the new version of the W87 Mod 1 project. The Pentagon, NNSA and other organizations participating in the project do not disclose any data. Even the general principles of the project and the degree of its relationship with the development of the same name from the eighties remain unknown.

Apparently, the new version of the W87-1 warhead will not differ fundamentally from the one created in the past in its main features. It will be a medium-sized product weighing no more than 250-300 kg. It will be made in a conical body with heat protection necessary for passing through dense layers of the atmosphere. Like other products of this class, the W87-1 block will not receive flight control. It will have to move to the target along a ballistic trajectory, to which it will be brought by the dispensing stage.

The W87 Mod 1 block, developed in the 475s, was equipped with a thermonuclear charge with a capacity of XNUMX kt of TNT equivalent. A fuse with two operating modes was used - upon contact with the surface or at a specified height above it. What characteristics the deeply modernized warhead will have is still unknown.


Design appearance of the LGM-35A ICBM

The prospective LGM-35A Sentinel ICBM is being developed by Northrop Grumman and is still in the earliest stages of development. Only the most basic details about this project have been disclosed to date, and the bulk of information remains unavailable. In particular, the payload of the future missile and the configuration of its combat equipment are unknown.

It is assumed that the Sentinel will carry a multiple warhead. With technical characteristics at the level of the Minuteman or better, this ICBM will be able to carry up to 8-10 warheads of the new type. However, other options are also possible. Thus, the current LGM-30 were once re-equipped with single-block warheads with one W87-1 block.

Big plans


The current state of the US strategic nuclear forces leaves much to be desired, and the Pentagon is actively working to address this problem. Over the past decade, it has taken a number of measures aimed at restoring lost production capacity, as well as developing new missiles and related combat equipment.

These programs are complex and moving slowly. However, NNSA and others are already showing early results. Critical production is gradually being restored, giving the Pentagon reason for optimism. Whether the current successes can be built upon and all the desired results achieved in the future remains to be seen.
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    9 October 2024 06: 28
    And where did the firewood, I mean the plutonium, come from? From Russia, perhaps? I wouldn't be surprised...
    1. +5
      9 October 2024 06: 50
      Quote: dandi
      And where did the firewood, I mean the plutonium, come from? From Russia, perhaps? I wouldn't be surprised...

      The US has the most operating nuclear reactors in the world, so there's nowhere to put our own. And ours was bought to destroy the return potential.
      1. +7
        9 October 2024 07: 26
        Plutonium from PWR or BWR is not suitable for nuclear charges (accumulation of 238Pu, 241Pu, making the charge unstable)
        Weapons-grade Pu is produced unintended in Canada's CANDU reactors and can be recovered from spent nuclear fuel reprocessing.
        1. +3
          9 October 2024 07: 30
          An alternative is special fuel assemblies with depleted (waste) uranium in peripheral assemblies. In a short campaign, such spent nuclear fuel contains quite suitable weapons-grade Pu.
          1. 2al
            +1
            10 January 2025 15: 10
            Moreover, for example, it is precisely according to this scheme that Pu239 can be produced at Westinghouse assemblies at VVER reactors of Ukrainian NPPs, in particular at the Rivne NPP.
        2. 0
          9 October 2024 10: 49
          It is precisely the American extraction capacities that are of interest... What is in the warheads after all - plutonium from old or fresh?
          1. 0
            10 October 2024 01: 52
            The old one is better, it has already worn out its time and needs to be cleaned less often, there is a lot of it, as Matroskin said - we have this shoe polish, that is, plutonium (and they have it) in abundance.
          2. 2al
            0
            10 January 2025 15: 17
            Rosatom, by supplying enriched uranium even as part of TVEL, helps ensure that the US has fresh Pu.
            "Unfortunately, in recent years, the IAEA has begun to publish data on nuclear materials under Agency safeguards using the so-called significant quantity (s.q.), corresponding to 8 kg of plutonium with a 238Pu isotope content of less than 20%, which is sufficient to manufacture a nuclear explosive device. In these units, the amount of plutonium under IAEA safeguards in the world in SNF amounted to 2020 s.q. in 172, and in extracted form - 354 s.q. For comparison, according to IAEA data for 12, there were 237 tons of plutonium under its safeguards in the world in SNF, and 2003 tons in extracted form.
            "
  2. +17
    9 October 2024 06: 52
    And as the respected Boyard was saying, everything is fine with our nuclear triad: Yars and Burevestniks are flying, and the Status-6 is floating, but the Yankees, the slackers, have even forgotten how to enrich uranium. laughing . And here it turns out that they haven't forgotten at all and can quite "repeat" it. Oh, it was not for nothing that the classic said about how many wonderful discoveries the spirit of enlightenment is preparing for us. I'm just afraid that the main "revelations" are still ahead of us.
    1. -2
      9 October 2024 07: 26
      [quote=Dante] And here it turns out that they haven’t forgotten at all and can very well “repeat”
      Don't confuse soft with warm. We are talking about resumption of plutonium core production or rods/pits/ necessary
      for detonation of a thermonuclear charge on a W87-1 nuclear warhead.
      [quote]He updated for the first time since 1979 and is intended for future LGM-35A Sentinel nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles that the United States plans to deploy in 5 years.
      The W87-1 warhead itself is not new, but rather "repurposed" from the W87s found on the ancient Minutemen.

      The US Nuclear Agency has stated the goal of restoring the lost production to 80 cores per year. However, due to high costs, deterioration of infrastructure and a shortage of qualified personnel, such rates are unrealistic, according to American nuclear experts.[/quote]. The trick is that BB is considered a new remake of No the charges themselves are oldIt is precisely to replace the old detonators that new plutonium cores are needed.

      In total, according to reports to Congress, it was required restore more than three dozen critical technologies and find some other necessary materials. We need lithium. And not just any lithium, but a certain isotope. There is no production of it in the US now, and there are no reserves left, but throughout the 2000s we and the Chinese sold them laboratory quantities of it.
      1. +4
        9 October 2024 08: 18
        Do not confuse soft with warm.

        And where is everything that you described in the article? The author directly tells us about the cores, and not about the cores for them. No, understanding who the author is, I fully admit that he simply could not understand the issue, but this does not change the essence, if the Yankees want (or rather if they are pressed) - they will go this way and will go taking into account previous developments - quickly.
        1. 0
          9 October 2024 09: 47
          Quote: Dante
          The author tells us directly about the cores,

          It's like the fuse in the F-1 grenade, it looks like a cylindrical core, there are several of them in the warhead, usually it is correct to call them "pitas", well, not the cores.
          Quote: Dante
          They will go through this path and they will go through it taking into account previous developments - quickly.

          The thing is that many developments and important competencies have been lost, so it won't work quickly. Now they have time for a new rocket Sentinel with this warhead announced for 5 years, and then...we'll live and see. During this time, a lot can change.

          "Either the donkey will die or the emir (padishah) will die!" recourse
          1. +2
            9 October 2024 09: 56
            Manufactured in the USA of one plutonium core (pit) could cost approximately $6 million.
            This is stated in a report published by the US Congressional Budget Office, as reported by the Aiken Standard.

            The agency reached this conclusion after reviewing available information about the Energy Department's plans, which include building the Savannah River Plutonium Processing Facility on the site of the unfinished MOX plant.

            Last year, the department issued an assessment The cost of restoring pit production capacity in the United States is approximately $9 billion.
            In the United States, legislation has established that the country must produce 2030 cores annually by 80.

            In May 2018, the National Nuclear Security Administration and the U.S. Department of Defense recommended that the cores be produced at two sites: 50 pits at the Savannah River Facility in South Carolina and 30 at the Los Alamos National Laboratory.

            If necessary, each of the two facilities will be able to reach the level of 80 pits per year. - writes portal Atom info ru
    2. 2al
      0
      10 January 2025 15: 21
      The problem is that without direct testing there is always a noticeable non-zero probability that new cores will fizzle in the device rather than cause a chain reaction.
  3. 0
    9 October 2024 06: 58
    I look at these cones in the photos. And I remembered how Edmond Hamilton's book "Star Kings" described the super-megaweapon "Destroyer" that extinguished stars and erased space. There was just such a set of cones there. And this story was published back in 1947
    1. +2
      9 October 2024 23: 21
      Heinlein described the uranium bomb back in 43
  4. -4
    9 October 2024 08: 40
    I read that the US no longer has nuclear weapons. I couldn't believe it. But it may be true - the plutonium initiating charges in US warheads seem to have really degraded.
    1. +2
      10 October 2024 02: 02
      Journalists have degraded.
  5. +2
    9 October 2024 21: 07
    It is a simple sphere of plutonium-239, the mass of which is less than critical.
    What does mass have to do with it? This phrase is from the arsenal of magazines of the early 50s. Critical density of the substance is needed, so plutonium is compressed by a converging shock wave of a conventional explosive. And then the reaction that begins becomes the fuse for a hydrogen warhead.
  6. -3
    10 October 2024 01: 29
    Well, the fact that a laboratory can produce a single warhead is nothing new. The only thing left is to build and launch a plant for the extraction and enrichment of plutonium, as well as an enterprise for mechanical processing to finished products. There are practically no engineers and specialists capable of such work left in the US, it's just age. But the new generation of Americans is capable of trading shares on the stock exchanges quite well, and you can't force them to work with radioactive and toxic materials for any salary.
    1. 0
      10 October 2024 02: 00
      There are heaps of old stockpiles of weapons-grade plutonium. 35+ tons (we have even more), and 10 kg for the pit. There is no hurry. And the old charges are still there, just brush off the dust, like heating up candles, and that's it. This is not to mention the other components of the ammunition.
    2. 0
      4 December 2024 12: 56
      You have an interesting idea of ​​Americans. You probably base your ideas on the satirical performances of Mikhail Zadornov. But in reality, unlike Russia, blue-collar jobs in the US have not degraded, are not considered something shameful, any work is honorable for Americans, and hard physical labor can even be called a mandatory stage of a successful career and a mandatory point in the dossier of most billionaires. In addition, new citizens from the countries of the former USSR, from Latin America take on any job, and very often, especially our former compatriots, have the highest competencies and qualifications. In addition, no one in the US has thought of leasing out scientific institutes for commercial offices, factories have not been destroyed or sawed up for scrap metal. So, in my subjective opinion, the US has a higher chance of success in the new arms race than we do.
  7. -1
    10 October 2024 01: 55
    One thing took a long time to make and was expensive, but before, hundreds were made. Under Reagan, there was no such crap.
  8. +1
    10 October 2024 01: 59
    Quote: Dzenn
    Well, the fact that a laboratory can produce a single warhead is nothing new. The only thing left is to build and launch a plant for the extraction and enrichment of plutonium, as well as an enterprise for mechanical processing to finished products. There are practically no engineers and specialists capable of such work left in the US, it's just age. But the new generation of Americans is capable of trading shares on the stock exchanges quite well, and you can't force them to work with radioactive and toxic materials for any salary.

    Blessed is he who believes - he is warm in the world ...
    I read such revelations and am amazed!
    Author, have you traded with Americans on the stock exchange? And have you forced them to work with radioactive materials? Where did YOU PERSONALLY get such knowledge of "Americans"? Or are you whistling from hearsay?
  9. 0
    10 October 2024 03: 33
    It is a pity that the author did not describe the features of plutonium charges and why their production was stopped earlier.
    From this it would be possible to understand the meaning of what is happening. For example, based on the expiration date of these charges, estimate the timeframe of the attack on us planned by the US.
  10. +1
    18 January 2025 18: 28
    I would not call the plutonium core a simple product. As far as I remember, the core is not homogeneous, but consists of two parts - the inner (yolk) and the outer, while the plutonium is in different phases (conditionally), which does not allow the fission reaction to begin. Upon initiation, the outer layer goes into the same phase as the "yolk" and the reaction begins. The outer layer itself goes into the yolk phase over time, and therefore plutonium warheads degrade and require updating. I do not quite understand how the Americans managed to preserve their warheads, without specialized production, since 1989? I cannot say for sure what condition the nuclear warheads are in, not serviced for 35 years, but their functionality is definitely different from the factory one.
    There is probably a nuance here. It is more likely that the US has restored the production of plutonium and new nuclei, because information has surfaced that the States are cannibalizing old warheads to create new, less powerful ones for the same aerial bombs.