Washing your pants is done by NORAD and nothing else!

43 905 58
Washing your pants is done by NORAD and nothing else!

The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) has released, and those interested in the topic have watched with a sense of deep satisfaction, a video of an F-16C fighter from the 18th Fighter Interceptor Squadron (18th FIS) intercepting a pair of Russian Tu-95MS "Bear" fighters and their escorts off the coast of Alaska.


In the video, the Su-35S performs a maneuver that they call "butting", although the maneuver looks more like "cutting". Seriously, who butts with their back? Unless we make allowance for the fact that it's the States...



Let me quote another tearful line from our friend Tyler from NI:

"The Su-35 performs a very close maneuver, intersecting the flight path of the Viper. This is the most dramatic video we have seen of such a close encounter since a B-52 crew experienced a similar incident over the Black Sea several years ago."

Well, we also wrote in roughly the same vein: what did the B-52 lose in the Black Sea waters? No, it's clear that it lost its composure and the cleanliness of its flight suits, but these are, damn it, combat aircraft and there should be combat pilots there, not sissy girls! And if someone has relaxed their muscles too much in certain places - it happens...


And the B-52 crews should have steel ropes instead of nerves. The Chinese have even more planes than we do, and in terms of show-off and desire to put themselves above everyone else, the Chinese pilots are second only to the Kazakhs in their mass. But at least the Kazakhs don't fly.

As for the guys who get into the cockpits of their F-16Cs, the 18th Fighter-Interceptor Squadron, which is under the NORAD command, is not exactly elite, but they don’t take just anyone. The company name is “Aggressors,” this is the 354th Fighter Group, which smelled gunpowder back in 1942. In theory, they simply have to be strong morally and physically.

"Video released by NORAD, captured on a 360-degree action camera mounted in the F-16's cockpit, shows how alarmed the Viper pilot was by the Su-35's maneuver."


This is what I want to say: “Don’t cry, girls, everyone will get married.”

“On September 23, 2024, a NORAD aircraft conducted a safe and disciplined interception of a Russian military aircraft in the area Defense Alaska. The behavior of one Russian Su-35 was unsafe, unprofessional, and put everything at risk – not something you would see in a professional air force” – God forgive me, but Air Force Maj. Gen. Gregory Guillot cried like this

However, let's go through the incident from the very beginning.

The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) said in its initial September 23 press release about the interception that four Russian aircraft were involved:

"The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) detected and tracked four Russian military aircraft operating in the Alaska Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) on September 23, 2024.

The Russian aircraft remained in international airspace and did not violate U.S. or Canadian sovereign airspace. Such Russian activity in the Alaska Air Defense Observation Zone occurs regularly and is not considered a threat.

The air defense zone begins where sovereign airspace ends and is a defined area of ​​international airspace that requires the permanent identification of all aircraft in the interests of national security.

(That is, a certain buffer zone, when a target begins to move through it towards sovereign airspace, it is in this zone that it must be identified, with a subsequent decision being made “to shoot down or not to shoot down” - ed.)

NORAD uses a multi-layered defense network consisting of satellites, ground-based and airborne radars, and fighter aircraft to track aircraft and advise on appropriate actions. NORAD remains prepared to employ a range of response options to protect North America."

And here it is worth noting that the 18th Fighter-Interceptor Squadron is unique in the US Air Force. The unit was previously designated as the 18th Aggressor Squadron (18th AGRS), that is, it took on the functions of training to play out a simulated enemy, but was renamed the 18th FIS. That is, it became a full-fledged interceptor squadron. This happened after the need arose to replace the F-22s, which had been grounded and based at Elmendorf Air Force Base in Anchorage.

"The growing demand for F-22s to perform missions around the world has led to the Aggressors based to the north at Eielson Air Force Base increasingly replacing Raptors as a readiness boost."

I think everyone is smiling knowingly now. Yes, the F-22 has so much work all over the world that 160 (or however many there really are left) planes are simply in great demand! And there is simply no one to protect the airspace, so densely the Raptors are used everywhere where there is a need for them. And the need, as this comedy goes, is everywhere. If only we knew where these places are, where hordes of F-22s operate (with undoubted success).

And F-16s were assigned to guard the border, and not simple ones, but the ones that usually play the role of the Russian Aerospace Forces in training alerts.

This has led to some very funny situations where F-16s dressed in "Russian" camouflage have intercepted real Russian aircraft, usually over the Bering Sea.


Well, not exactly similar, but yes, almost “ours”

While some of the unit's F-16s now use the standard paint scheme, these interestingly painted "Russian Indians" perform both air defense and combat alert training missions. And that makes the 18th FIS unlike any other unit in the armed forces.


A NORAD F-16 Fighting Falcon intercepts a Russian Il-38 in the Alaska Air Defense Identification Zone in September 2024 as part of Operation Noble Eagle.


A NORAD F-16 Fighting Falcon intercepts a Russian Tu-142 in the Alaska Air Defense Identification Zone in September 2024 as part of Operation Noble Eagle.


F-16 Fighting Falcons of the North American Aerospace Defense Command conduct final checks before takeoff from Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska. One aircraft is in normal paint, one in "Russian" paint.

In general, Americans should have already gotten used to the fact that Russians work on the edge. Air incidents occur systematically and regularly, according to the theory of academician Ivan Petrovich Pavlov, Americans should have long ago developed a habit of such moments. Or start secreting gastric juice.

The very discussion of whether a maneuver is professional or unprofessional – from the American point of view, everything should happen as if it were a maneuver: they met at a pre-determined distance, shook their wings, took a photo and went their separate ways. Well, okay, it’s just a meeting.

And what if it’s not a meeting, but a completely normal interception? Like this, on the brink of life and death, that is, whoever is cooler, more attentive and more professional – he survived? No, in fact, many people understand with their minds that for American pilots, a war in white gloves is normal. SAMs and radars are destroyed by cruise rockets, the enemy airfields have also been plowed up in advance in two stages. All that remains is to very beautifully place bombs and rockets in the designated squares, return and receive well-deserved awards and applause.

Actually, we have seen this. Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan. But what will happen if everything does not go according to the script? All this indignation at the "unprofessional approach" - what will happen then? Yes, there have been more such incidents lately, and the reason for this is the US policy, for which, forgive us, everyone gives an answer to the extent of their own depravity.

And in general, at least ours do not drop aluminum foil in the direction of an American plane. "Chaff" can cause serious damage to an engine, and Chinese pilots are often guilty of this. They drop it. And this makes American pilots very sad. After all, the Americans are professionals to the last cell, they also use techniques like the same "frontal strike", but they use them non-aggressively.

As for Russian activity near Alaska, it has increased dramatically in recent months, along with China, which is now expanding its air and maritime power projection capabilities, with a particular focus on Alaska. This has included the first flight of Chinese H-6 cruise missile carriers off the coast of Alaska and an increased Russian-Chinese naval presence in the area. This has prompted the U.S. Department of Defense to devote more resources to this strategically important area, including sending naval forces there to closely monitor and deter Russian and Chinese air and naval operations, which have recently increased in frequency.

Excuse me, but what's illogical about that? So, the guidance of missiles and BEKs in the Black Sea with the help of American AWACS and strategic aircraft drones - this is normal, but joint exercises with those whom the US today calls enemy No. 1 - no?

Ah, that's different...

Well, yes, bringing democracy in white gloves all over the world, that's what's most important to us. Good. Unprofessional and dangerous behavior of the Su-35S (tail number 24 "Blue"/RF-95493) with the pilot of the 22nd Guards Fighter aviation The regiment from Primorsky Krai apparently caused mental and psychological trauma to the American pilot. Yes, it happens.


But maybe it was not worth crossing the course of the Russian bomber so professionally that a completely untrained and unprofessional Russian pilot perceived this as a threat to the Tu he was covering and performed the maneuver that we saw on the video?

It's all very simple: with non-professionals, everything must be done accordingly! The Russians don't understand that passage at such a distance is absolutely safe - that's because they don't read American instructions! If they could cope with their own, where would they get the time and skill to study the divine word from the US Air Force command? Sorry, this is how we know how.

Here, on the contrary, sit down and urgently write instructions on safety techniques for interaction with Russian pilots! Short, but capacious:
- fly at a safe distance, at least 5 km from Russian aircraft;
- do not make any sudden maneuvers, “pancake” is your everything;
- professionally approach the specified distance, show yourself and quickly get back before the Russians short-circuit.

By the way, a separate point could be made for such interaction with the Chinese. They don't have the same imagination as we do, they have their own cockroaches, but recently Chinese pilots have been communicating a lot with ours. Let's draw conclusions, gentlemen, let's draw conclusions. And write instructions.

And we raise the salaries of the 18th Squadron. With the Arctic and Pacific regions becoming increasingly important, tensions between Russia and the United States will in any case increase. China, meanwhile, is becoming more confident in conducting military operations at long distances, especially since consultants have been found.


A great shot of a well-done interaction

The 18th Fighter Squadron is likely to be busier than ever in the coming months and years. So we leave all this clamor about unprofessionalism and dangerous maneuvers on the ground. A dangerous maneuver is when two aircraft collide, that's dangerous.

And when one flew on screaming “Fuck you!” and the second one smelled a strong odor from below – this situation is dangerous only for the laundry of the 18th squadron and nothing more.

But what kind of super-professionals are these who are afraid of such an air incident? They are crap, not professionals. You wouldn't fly in Voronezh during the day, you would just drive around the city... you would return to your America with grey hair. If you returned at all.

Of course, the command of the Russian Aerospace Forces as a whole and the commanders of the 22nd Guards Fighter Aviation Regiment should listen to the cries from the other side of the ocean, read the comments in the specialized media, conduct appropriate explanatory work among the flight crews... And even write there about the work done.

But laundry services are at the sole expense of the NORAD command, and nothing else! We don't have an unlimited budget, you have to understand.
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 19
    5 October 2024 06: 00
    I consider the United States to be an enemy of our state and people at the moment.
    And I approve of all measures taken by our Aerospace Forces to counteract US aviation.
    Keep it up...respect and respect to our military pilots. hi
    1. +8
      5 October 2024 07: 18
      I fully support you!

      I also think that the Alaskan direction needs to be strengthened. And the air defense needs to be strengthened as well.
    2. +1
      5 October 2024 13: 22
      The author of the article writes that the A-16 was dangerously close to our bomber and was scared by the Su-35S for it. It served him right and I hope it did. But why are we again shown video footage from the American, and not shown how he violated flight rules by cutting off the Tu-95. Or is there no such footage from our planes (not a single one)? I doubt it...
      There is something similar with the only photo of the Israeli Air Force base after the Iranian attack, which all the world media have rubbed out to pieces. And where are the photos from Chinese, Indian, Russian reconnaissance satellites? Yes, now perhaps some Arab countries have such satellites and what, no one else is interested in seeing whether everything is really so sad?
      1. 0
        5 October 2024 23: 12
        But why are we again shown video footage of the American, and not shown how he violated flight rules by cutting off the TU-95?
        Well, objectively, there was a rapprochement between two fighters, interference on the right, the American should move to the right or change flight level. This is where the obvious violation by the American is shown, Su also had to maneuver to avoid a collision... over the radio, he (the American) was clearly repeatedly offered to change the route, flying time after time in front of his nose.
        1. +3
          6 October 2024 12: 52
          What's the point of all this outrageousness? How many Su-35s do we have? The plant used to produce up to 30 planes a month. Before the SVO - 10 planes a year. And where can we get pilots? A disaster! We haven't been in 2nd place in combat aircraft for a long time. There are lies and deception everywhere. All the simple Su-27s have been written off. And the Su-27SM (SM3) are living out their days... Uncles, managers, haven't you had enough yet?
          1. 0
            10 October 2024 10: 52
            NATO has just under 2000 F-35s and Russia has just over 20 Su-57s...
            The same thing with satellites, the same thing with automated tactical control systems, communications, etc., etc.
            Almost 100 times superiority in the most sensitive areas...
            1. 0
              4 January 2025 23: 58
              Nonsense. There are no 2000 units there. And there are not that many combat-ready ones, the plane turned out to be problematic. And don't compare the F35 with the Su-57. It's like comparing a scooter with a motorcycle.
        2. +1
          6 October 2024 15: 52
          Disant, I have not seen such information that the American was repeatedly warned and time after time flew under his nose. Perhaps it was so, but all our TV channels showed only how our Su-16S jumped out from behind the tail of the F-35 and cut it off...
          It is absolutely impossible to understand from that aerial photography whether the F-16 really came dangerously close to the Tu-95. So I asked myself, if that was the case, then why can we never present our aerial photography, name the real distance and the one allowed by international rules? We do not conduct such photography anywhere and never?
          Do you know what distance is considered safe and acceptable without breaking the rules? Please tell me!
  2. -1
    5 October 2024 06: 06
    How many American drones did the Houthis shoot down? Eleven?
    That's all... We need to shoot down everything that harms Russia, starting with drones and ending with those Muscovite satellites that plow the vastness of outer space, where Makar wouldn't drive calves...
    1. +4
      5 October 2024 06: 16
      How many American drones did the Houthis shoot down? Eleven?
      That's it...Everything needs to be knocked down,


      When I read comments like these, for some reason I always remember the joke about the grandfather who complains to the doctor that his neighbor can 8 times a night)

      "Well, you also say that you shot down eleven American drones." laughing
      1. +5
        5 October 2024 10: 09
        Look, Iran is great - they said that they destroyed no less than 20 35s and two Merkava brigades for surrender. Write more, why should we feel sorry for them, the enemies! (C)
      2. 0
        5 October 2024 23: 20
        heda
        When I read comments like these, for some reason I always remember the joke about my grandfather.
        so they show the crash and the fall and the smoking debris and the video every time, and don't tell a joke for edification
    2. +1
      5 October 2024 10: 08
      If you want to ruin the country, start shooting down Moscow's satellites?
  3. + 27
    5 October 2024 06: 12
    From one short video such an article, so many letters and in general it’s just blah blah blah
    1. +5
      5 October 2024 06: 20
      From one short video such an article

      And it would be fine if there was an Article.
      And so, back to the laundry. Back to diapers.
      The story with Khibiny apparently taught us nothing.
    2. +5
      5 October 2024 10: 11
      How else? Where will the author get his food?
    3. +9
      5 October 2024 10: 25
      so many letters and in general it's just blah blah blah

      It seems that Roman has invented a new genre: “a long feuilleton on a far-fetched pretext.”
  4. +4
    5 October 2024 06: 13
    What? It went so beautifully. A handsome man!
  5. + 13
    5 October 2024 06: 14
    Instead of a video from VK I see some crying dog. Do I need to log in to VK?
    This is not how you embed videos.
    1. +8
      5 October 2024 09: 41
      This is Roman's dog, who again read an article about nothing.
    2. +1
      6 October 2024 12: 24
      And this is how respect for the readers of the site is shown. I suggest not commenting on such empty articles in any way, ignoring the info garbage.
      1. -1
        7 October 2024 22: 32
        I disagree here! On the contrary, we need to post more videos like this...
        Remember how our Sukhoi flew over an American destroyer, and everyone went "deaf" and "blind", and then almost half the crew was discharged to the shore... If only it were like that more often...
        And...take an example from our Chinese comrades - they told the striped ones: if your Donald Cook enters the economic zone of the PRC again and passes by the artificial islands built by us - WE WILL SINK IT!
        This had an immediate effect...
        A...the narrow-eyed ones definitely won't be standing by the map with a RED FELT-TIP PEN...
        1. -1
          15 January 2025 08: 57
          Let me remind you of the threats of the "slant-eyed" to shoot down the plane carrying a certain elderly American lady.
          AND?..
  6. + 13
    5 October 2024 06: 16
    After reading such an “article” you begin to believe the cheerful reports of Konashenkov and other troubadours.
    Roman, aren't you ashamed of such a fir tree?
    I am in no way belittling the skill and courage of the pilots, but to make such an “article” out of an ordinary event is going beyond the pale.
  7. + 10
    5 October 2024 06: 40
    And what is the article about? About how everyone is afraid of us? But the enemies fly wherever they want, and they continue to fly. The author wrote something about showing off, so this opus is exactly that.
  8. +3
    5 October 2024 06: 50
    In my opinion, our media, including the Military District, greatly exaggerate the significance of the Su-35 and F-16 incident.

    I think that if our bombers were flying off the coast of the United States, their pilots would behave the same way.
  9. 0
    5 October 2024 08: 28
    Does the fu16 have more rockets in the video?
  10. +6
    5 October 2024 08: 52
    A friend of mine, who served as a gunner-radio operator on a Tu-16 in the Pacific Fleet, told me that such situations used to be the norm. At any attempt to escort our "big ones", MiGs would immediately fly in and maneuver "pull" the mattress-buyers away from ours. When meeting an "Orion", they would pour kerosene on it.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. +8
    5 October 2024 09: 23
    And what if it's not a meeting, but a completely normal interception? Like this, on the edge of life and death, that is, whoever is cooler, more attentive and more professional - he survived?

    The author does not understand the meaning of the word "interception". Interception is also when they fly out to visually identify an air object detected by radar. No "on the brink of life and death" - they flew in, approached within safe limits, made a visual identification, took a photo, reported to the command post, if necessary - escorted until leaving the zone of responsibility, shook their wings - and flew away. Such flights happen all the time, these are normal working moments, and the author made up some goddamn thing.
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. +6
    5 October 2024 10: 07
    Finally, Donald Cook is forgotten and a new reason for pride has been found. A routine episode, ours flew by, theirs complained. All within the rules of the game. It can already be forgotten. But what should Roman write about then?
  15. +1
    5 October 2024 10: 08
    He was sent on a COMBAT mission. He had to cover IL, REALLY, i.e. hang on their "6" and demonstrate readiness to use weapons. So that their necks would ache and the indicators would go crazy.
    Instead, he decided to show off and exposed himself.

    They would have hit the tail briefly and then what? Jump over the ocean, raise the remains of the plane from the bottom, prove that you are not a camel. And there is no one below to pick up, 3 destroyers for the entire fleet. Even if they survived, in today's times they would still have to pay for the plane.

    And the IL without a roof, they would have trained it.

    This is unprofessionalism. Transfer to the MDC for half a year, in a good way... hi
  16. +1
    5 October 2024 10: 12
    I suggest the author take a video of a SU vehicle looking into its belly as the topic of the next article. Well, and then we can also remember our Donald Cook...
  17. -9
    5 October 2024 10: 17
    Good article. THANKS to the author! Our pilots do EVERYTHING correctly. And "cut" and the Su-23 is very professional.. And I also liked this: "You wouldn't fly in Voronezh during the day, you'd just drive around the city... you'd return to your America with grey hair. If you returned at all."..That's for sure. The way we drive in Voronezh on streets clogged with cars, and in courtyards - that's something... I drove in the States... and not for one month. There everything is orderly and calm. But like here - they twist their fingers at their temples "crazy"... like... So it is in the sky.. Only there it is not a peaceful city.
  18. + 11
    5 October 2024 10: 18
    Who is this text for? What is it for? To stir up interest in the jingoistic patriotic mantra "we are Russian, which means we are cooler than everyone else"? A Russian Aerospace Forces fighter pilot took non-violent actions to restrict foreign aircraft access to strategic aircraft. The actions were radical and decisive, so that there would be no misunderstanding. That's all. But then the author for some reason wanted to add something about American pants, and at the same time take a sour look at the Chinese and, for some reason, the Kazakhs. What do the Chinese and Kazakhs have to do with it? So that the Russians look even cooler? Is your own self-respect lacking?
  19. 0
    5 October 2024 10: 23
    I wonder if there were any clashes. In the Podvig magazine in the late 80s I read Nikolai Cherkashin's story Flight at Full Radius. The plot of which is built around a collision between a Phantom (!?) and an unnamed USSR strategist during an interception. Was there a factual basis for the story? P.S. It's funny that the type of our aircraft is not named in the story. And only a few years later I identified the 95th. The USSR suffered from some kind of maniacal secrecy. I remember in the TM magazine for 88, in an article about Tupolev aircraft, the Tu-22 was listed last in chronology. Which is exactly the 22, and not the M2 or M3. And the 95th was not there. It's somehow strange. All these types were already present in Janes, but their readers were not even allowed to mention them.
    1. -1
      7 October 2024 22: 46
      Well, you are wrong about the maniacal secrecy in the USSR...
      At that time, EVERYONE had secrecy, and the striped ones first of all, and describing every incident (in the air and at sea) in the "press" - THEN it was not in the RULES OF GOOD TONE in relations between states...
      The same applied to the striped ones...
      They didn't tell ANYONE how they "looked into the pipes" of our ships during the crisis of 61....
      And no one then accompanied our ships to Cuba from the air...
  20. +8
    5 October 2024 10: 28
    Another article in the style of Donald Cook, everyone in wet pants and everyone jumping out of the windows shouting - the Russians are coming! But reality says otherwise, the Aerospace Forces are not capable of taking out the Ukrainian air defense with the quality and quantity of flight units, but yes, we'll throw hats at them if anything happens
    1. +1
      5 October 2024 18: 10
      Quote: Private shooter
      Another article in the style of Donald Cook, everyone in wet pants and everyone jumping out of the windows shouting - the Russians are coming! But reality says otherwise, the Aerospace Forces are not capable of taking out the Ukrainian air defense with the quality and quantity of flight units, but yes, we'll throw hats at them if anything happens

      Earlier, a video appeared on social networks showing the fall of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). "They are reporting from the scene: our newest heavy strike drone S-70 "Okhotnik" was lost near Konstantinovka. Eyewitness videos say that this is most likely true - the silhouette of the falling machine is very similar to the silhouette of this drone," Kots wrote.
      The military correspondent added that, according to preliminary data, the drone was shot down by an air-to-air missile from the lead fighter. "It is possible that the communication channel was disrupted and the S-70 became uncontrollable."
  21. -10
    5 October 2024 10: 34
    The unprofessional and dangerous behavior of the Su-35S (tail number 24 "Blue"/RF-95493) with the pilot of the 22nd Guards Fighter Aviation Regiment from Primorsky Krai apparently caused mental and psychological trauma to the American pilot. Yes, it happens.

    My soul rejoices when I read how our pilots ruin American diapers laughing . I completely agree with Lyokha from Android - the USA is the enemy of our state, and enemy No. 1 at that.
    1. -2
      6 October 2024 00: 26
      "Oh, Moska! She must be strong, barking at the Elephant!" :)
  22. +1
    5 October 2024 11: 24
    It reminds me of the behavior of drivers playing tag on the highway at 180 km/h - fun, dashing, adrenaline, until you crash into someone with a fatal outcome. This has nothing to do with interception and especially combat, they saw each other a hundred kilometers away. In the cockpits of the planes, both theirs and ours, there are men under 40, their whole life in military aviation, to believe that someone there was very scared is from the category of tales about the destroyer "Donald Cook" and the written-off crew. A military pilot performing an assigned task is first of all a professional who calculates chances, risks, consequences. The agreement between the USSR and the USA on
    Prevention of incidents in the open sea and in the airspace above it in 1972 was signed by non-idiots, they understood how it could end. And if during this incident it turned out like in that movie "Chatterboxes... We are used to saying: "The German is a coward, the German is afraid of a head-on, he will definitely turn away!" But mine did not turn away... Yes, so much so that the planes flew off: a wing to the left, a wing to the right. I came to on the ground - the "Yak" was burning out, and before my eyes ... cherry blossoms." the flight took place off the coast of the USA, the water was icy, the depths, their corpses and planes would be raised by the Americans, we do not have such equipment there. As a result, it could have turned into 2 corpses and the newest plane with the codes "friend or foe" in the hands of the Americans, I am not sure that the courage shown was worth it.
  23. +3
    5 October 2024 11: 25
    IMHO, this is some kind of hurray-winning description of ordinary maneuvers.
    Many times already something similar has been described, but without the hurray-telepathy.
    Fu
  24. +4
    5 October 2024 11: 44
    It's started again, hooray, they're afraid of us. Oh, the Americans are afraid of Russian pilots. Experience doesn't teach us anything, we'll throw our hats at them.
  25. +6
    5 October 2024 13: 48
    An article from the category "We are the coolest, and they are washing their pants" More nonsense. I don't know what instructions USAF pilots have now, but in the 80s they did not put on "white gloves" and could "barrel roll" our Tu-16 so that we could barely hold on to the controls. There are no cowards in the US Air Force. They are high-level pilots. And all this pink slime is for armchair patriots.
    1. -1
      7 October 2024 23: 06
      Yes, yes, sir... we remember their "courage" in the Korean War, when a pair of our MiG-21s went up against six F-4s... They pressed all the pedals to screw off...
      And...read (at your leisure!) - WHAT losses THEY had in THAT war...
      The information is available on Wikipedia and they themselves admitted it...
      1. +1
        8 October 2024 00: 19
        And their losses are evidence of cowardice?
  26. -7
    5 October 2024 13: 52
    In general, Americans should have already gotten used to the fact that Russians work on the edge. Air incidents occur systematically and regularly, according to the theory of academician Ivan Petrovich Pavlov, Americans should have long ago developed a habit of such moments. Or start secreting gastric juice.

    It seems they are dumber than amoebas, at least those have some reflexes, but these ones don’t show anything except crying. lol
  27. BAI
    -1
    5 October 2024 15: 19
    Solovyov was absolutely right in noting that the pilot should be awarded and sent to the General Staff Academy in order to be further promoted.
    In general, the coolest interception was when our pilot in the Baltic missed a British reconnaissance helicopter between the vertical tail of a Su-27
    1. +1
      8 October 2024 00: 18
      Can you give more details from this place? What kind of helicopter was it that flew between the keels of the 27th???)))
  28. +1
    5 October 2024 18: 22
    Well, a note...
    Well, I have no complaints about the author.
    I have the deepest understanding for those who do this for a "reward".
    If they don't write all this nonsense, then others will write this nonsense.
    Ok. Everything is explainable.
    IMHO the problem is different.
    In the conditions of a small victorious war, the quality of propaganda support is unimportant.
    The deed is done and everyone already understands everything about the army, weapons, communications, management, etc. without such crazy cheerful notes.
    When the confrontation drags on (casualties, wounded, refugees, invasion), it seems to me that the importance of information support increases, and accordingly the quality should change.
    If the stubbornness persists, then such information provision becomes just a pretext for mockery.
  29. +1
    5 October 2024 19: 59
    I don't get it, part of the text says that these are "vipers", in another part, "falcons". So who was there? These are different planes, although both are F16.
  30. +1
    5 October 2024 20: 24
    I read Roman's articles with pleasure.
    But what is THIS? Everything is in a jumble, one paragraph doesn't fit with the other.
    Some kind of diapers, smell from pants...
    Roman, did the pilots hand you their uniforms after the flight? Why are you so confident in writing about this?
    Not a VO, but a toy for children.
  31. -1
    5 October 2024 23: 27
    these words about someone peeing their pants smell like Donald Cook's entire crew quitting...
  32. -1
    6 October 2024 10: 21
    A very long article about how a domestic pilot almost crashed into an alien, but the latter had enough self-control not to open fire.
    1. 0
      7 October 2024 22: 57
      Well, opening fire is already a FIGHT...
      And...with all due respect to the striped "aces"
      I am tormented by vague doubts: how are your knees?? Aren't they shaking?! We have enough pilots with COMBAT experience, with the corresponding flight hours, so whoever was sitting at the controls of the F-16 certainly knew about the "consequences" of opening fire, and it is far from a fact that THEIR pilot had combat experience AT ALL...
      1. +1
        8 October 2024 00: 22
        Maybe it's worth deciding: are the US the number one aggressor in the world or could the pilot have had no combat experience?
  33. 0
    25 October 2024 19: 52
    You wouldn’t fly in Voronezh during the day, you’d just drive around the city… you’d return to your America with grey hair.
    Normal traffic in Voronezh, drivers, almost all, are cultured, follow the rules.
  34. 0
    12 December 2024 12: 25
    Just a little bit more and an aviation incident would have been ensured with all the consequences. In the USSR Air Force they gave NSS for such things.