A new batch of Pantsir-S anti-aircraft systems has arrived in the troops

A batch of combat vehicles of the Pantsir-S anti-aircraft missile and gun system has been delivered to the troops; the equipment was shipped by the Tula Instrument-Making Design Bureau, which is part of the High-Precision Complexes holding.

A new batch of Pantsir-S air defense missile and gun systems has been handed over to the Russian military. The number of vehicles in the batch is not disclosed, the delivery was made within the framework of the state defense order, and at an accelerated pace. As specified by Vysokotochnyye Kompleksy, this is already the second batch of anti-aircraft systems sent to the troops ahead of the delivery schedule.

The Pantsir-S systems have been modernized taking into account the experience of their use in the Air Defense Forces, and their operational efficiency has been increased. drones, "complex" shells and missiles. The Pantsir-S anti-aircraft missile and gun system is considered one of the most reliable anti-aircraft systems, which has proven the correctness of its design solutions during combat use.

The Pantsir family of systems demonstrate high efficiency. Pantsir crews have repeatedly detected and destroyed complex air targets during combat duty, and the system has proven its ability to destroy virtually the entire range of air attack weapons used by the enemy.

Earlier, it was reported that special small-sized anti-aircraft missiles were being developed for the Pantsir anti-aircraft missile and gun system to combat drones, which made it possible to place a significantly larger amount of ammunition on the system.

Comments

[tralflot1832]

Pantsir S, a highly sought-after complex with 99% efficiency.

[Lt. Air Force stock]

Quote: tralflot1832

Pantsir S, a highly sought-after complex with 99% efficiency.

There would also be unification of the Pantsir and Thor missiles.

[Klin64Rus]

Don't talk nonsense, the operating principle of the missiles there is completely different.

[Lt. Air Force stock]

Quote: Klin64Rus

the operating principle of the missiles there is completely different.

If you remove the mortar launcher and the engine in the nose of the Thor missiles, they can easily be launched from inclined launchers, which is much cheaper than having 2 separate short-range missile production facilities. Let me remind you that the S-400 and S-300V4, Poliment-Redut and S-350, Buk-M3 and Shtil-1 missiles are unified

[Klin64Rus]

Don't embarrass yourself. I'll ask a leading question: what is the guidance principle of the two missiles?

[Lt. Air Force stock]

Quote: Klin64Rus

Let me ask a leading question: what is the guidance principle of the two missiles?

Both have radio command.

[Klin64Rus]

Which of these methods do they have? Three-point method, lead method, constant lead angle guidance, parallel approach, proportional approach?

Let me repeat once again, the methods of their guidance are very different.

The closest to the armor is the air defense made from the Vampire MLRS. That's where it's really cheap and cheerful.

[Arigin]

Pantsir is made of foreign components, the Ministry of Defense did not want to accept it into service for a long time, and now there is no time for formalism.
Well, it’s good that they are producing it, it’s an extremely necessary thing, and for all parties.
Although some people think that the complex is outdated, since it does not destroy modern means of attack, well, maybe so.

[Woroshilow]

Armor on foreign components

You made this statement based on the demands of customers from the UAE and Algeria, I hope?

[Sergey39]

In Libya, when a drone destroyed a Pantsir without ammunition, they tried to pass it off as an unreliable system. But in fact, in the hands of good specialists "of non-Arab origin" it is a reliable combat system covering our skies.

[Arigin]

I think so, if only because we can’t even make bearings for it, not to mention electronics.
If it weren’t for foreign customers, there might not have been Pantsir, or it might have been later and different.

[Klin64Rus]

And what kind of electronics don't they make for it?

[Woroshilow]

Well, it’s good that they make it, it’s an extremely necessary thing, and to all parties.

You shouldn't argue with this person, he writes this for mere pennies and to keep the reservation, otherwise they can send you to zero. Put yourself in his difficult position.

[Arigin]

"The complex is needed by all parties."
What is meant is that EVERY country that thinks even a little bit about air defense urgently needs this or a similar complex.
Where they didn’t take care of this in advance, they made a big mistake, but that’s their problem.
The Russian Defense Ministry did not accept Pantsir into service for a long time, which suggests that there are many imported components. Probably, the problem was solved - now we make some things ourselves, AND WE CONTINUE TO IMPORT SOMETHING using murky schemes.
Here they ask what exactly we are carrying - I don’t know, and even if I knew, I certainly wouldn’t say.
Possibly bearings, sensors (all types) and civilian microelectronics (all types).

[Dart2027]

Quote: Arigin

Armor on foreign components

And Russia ran out of missiles several years ago. Change the methodology.

[Sergei 777]

Great news. The main thing is that the complex is being modernized and brought up to scratch.

[Lt. Air Force stock]

It is necessary to build stationary air defense points at fuel and lubricant bases, arsenals, etc. Since mobile complexes can be taken away or moved if necessary, and stationary air defense will always cover the object as long as there are missiles.

[paul3390]

Where can you get so many complexes? No - they once said it right, the best air defense is your tanks on enemy airfields...

[Pavel73]

The enemy's airfield is too big - practically the entire territory of the country. And no forces will be enough to control it all. Or a general mobilization for the sake of a complete occupation of Ukraine with a subsequent social explosion in Russia itself. Which, in fact, is what the Banderites are counting on. No, only the Ukrainians themselves can deal with this scum. And this must be explained to them. Which is what our army is doing now.

[topol717]

Quote: Pavel73

But no amount of strength would be enough to control it all.

And there is no need to control it. If Western "partners" stop supporting, then there will be no need to bring tanks anywhere.

[Grits]

Quote: Lt. air force reserve

It is necessary to build stationary air defense points at fuel and lubricant bases, arsenals, etc. Since mobile complexes can be taken away or moved if necessary, and stationary air defense will always cover the object as long as there are missiles.

I also share this opinion. After all, the car chassis is a significant increase in the cost of the complex. And the stationary "truncated" ones could be produced in much larger quantities. Which are really so lacking at many sites.

[unhappy]

Have you noticed that they are not just stationary air defense points, but raised on small towers, when the cock pecked his ass. I am talking about the "pantsirs" defending Moscow, the video flashed by, they were filmed from the road. And they were dragged onto the roofs of houses, it seems.
Thunder will not strike, the man will not cross himself

[Rus_80]

I wonder, C1 or C2(CM)

[foxes]

Every time I see this complex on a Kamaz chassis, my hair stands on end.

[Nastia makarova]

and on which one? 90% of the army is KamAZ

[lukash66]

Well, straight up 90. And Urals? They still drive Shishigas with 131s. By the way, cars with a bonnet layout are preferable at the front, there is a better chance of surviving a mine explosion.

[topol717]

Quote from: lukash66

By the way, cars with a bonnet layout are preferable at the front, there is a greater chance of surviving a mine explosion.

I think it's not just for nothing that you said all this? Do you have proof? Did you conduct experiments? Who has a better chance of surviving?
Because from the point of view of logic, for a driver, when a mine explodes, with the left front wheel, you are directly above the wheel at a height of 1.5 meters, or 80 cm from the wheel at a height of 1 meter, there should be no difference. It is bad in both places. In both places there is a zone of destruction from the explosion of the mine.

[UAT]

Why did you limit yourself to just the left front wheel? Their religion doesn't allow them to do it under the right one?

[topol717]

And how is the right different from the left?
or is there always only one driver in the car?

[UAT]

or is there always only one driver in the car?

No, not always. But, unlike others, the driver is always there. And the driver of a bonnet car, if there is an explosion under the right wheel, following your logic, has a much better chance of surviving.
Of course, you can discuss "bonnet-non-bonnet" for a long time and persistently. But you can also dig a little into this topic on VO and see that the well-founded and generally accepted point of view gives an absolute advantage to the bonnet configuration.

[Kayman55433]

Such experiments were conducted back in the USSR. You can find data on this topic online.

[topol717]

Yeah, they took us there and told everyone what our vehicles' weak points were and what bad mines we had. Yeah, I believed everything that was written on the internet.

[Nastia makarova]

131 and 66, if they appear, then from the reserves, the army has not had them for a long time, they switched to KamAZ, and 10% are Urals, KamAZ is swamped with orders from the Ministry of Defense for 10 years ahead

[KVU-NSVD]

Earlier it was reported that special small-sized anti-aircraft missiles were being developed for the Pantsir anti-aircraft missile and gun system.

"Nails" for Pantsir have been finished yet? Probably missed this moment.
Why not think about increasing the missile b/k? For example, a trailer with guides controlled from the main vehicle.

[Klin64Rus]

unlikely. The OCR can be long. Although, they can order batches without closing.

[Klin64Rus]

P.S. The armor can control missiles fired directly from the TZM. So, the problem was solved in a slightly unconventional way.

[KVU-NSVD]

This is just an option. Or you can put Pantsir on a larger chassis, MAZ or similar Russian ones, for example from Iskander or Tornado-S. Then the number of launchers can be increased. I just mean that there are too many targets and this requires more ammunition.

[Klin64Rus]

I agree, and, along with increasing the bookmaker's office, it is necessary to reduce its cost as such.
In short, we are waiting for nails. Well, I wonder how many there will be in each bookmaker.

[Peter1First]

So Pantsir already has the cheapest ammunition, which does not have homing, but only guidance from Pantsir itself.

[Klin64Rus]

I completely agree. But I want it even cheaper =)