"Glazyevtsy" against "Kudrintsev": the battle for the right to manage the budget

The less time left before the change in the top of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the more heated the degree of disputes in the Russian economic, and not only economic, environment. The reason here is not just the replacement of Sergey Ignatiev with another head of the Central Bank, but the possible replacement of the economic course of the Bank of Russia. The fact is that Sergei Ignatiev is a classic example of a conservative (many people call it Kudrino) economy, which is based on the following principle: let the financial system in Russia is not the most ideal, but you don’t need to change it, because it can fall down at all. Although the cow is sick, she doesn’t need to be treated, because she can die from treatment ... It is on this basic platform that not only the Central Bank has been working for the last 11 years, but also such a segment of the Russian government as the Ministry of Finance. In order to keep the dogmas of the Central Bank unshakable, the conservative lobby promotes the right people to the post of head of the Bank of Russia, among whom the persona of Alexei Kudrin and Alexei Ulyukayev stands out. The very fact of the appointment of one of these people as head of the Central Bank will mean that, in economic terms, there will be no significant changes in the country. The sluggish process will continue, based on investments in the foreign banking system, which is supposedly capable of attracting crowds of new investors to the Russian Federation. However, for 11 years of managing the Central Bank, Mr. Ignatiev, the endless stream of foreign investors in Russia for some reason has not been fixed, and therefore one can hardly expect this flow after being appointed to the post, for example, Alexei Kudrin.


True, in addition to Kudrin, Ulyukaev and other respected gentlemen who adhere to the concept “nothing needs to be changed in the economy - we are satisfied with everything,” there are other candidates for the post of head of the Bank of Russia. Among those are the well-known Russian economist Sergey Glazyev, who has been working as an adviser to the President of the Russian Federation since July last year. At one time, Glazyev drew Vladimir Putin’s attention to the fact that if the current economic model in Russia lasts a couple of years unchanged, then nothing good will come of it. According to Glazyev, Russia, owing to the infinite hope for the US dollar, may find itself in a new crisis funnel, which will pull all manufacturing industries without exception. His main message is that the Russian economy has long been in need of a quality recovery, one manifestation of which may be the support of domestic producers, and not speculation with foreign currencies that is meaningless for the vast majority of citizens.

Obviously, the position of Sergei Glazyev for the modern elite of both the Central Bank and the Ministry of Finance looks revolutionary. After all, in essence, the presidential adviser proposes to start up, finally, the money supply in the real sector of the Russian economy, and not to look for happiness in foreign financial markets. And this for today's Central Bank is like a knife ...

That is why the correspondence struggle between the "Glazyevtsy" and "Kudryntsy" is planned. The former believe that money should work within the country and for the country, the latter are confident that this is populism, and that it is necessary to continue to trust foreign partners: they say, to somehow protect future generations from economic shocks.

True, why go so far and think about future generations, when current generations had time to feel how foreign investments of the state “helped” during the economic crisis of 2008-10. After US financial companies began to experience difficulties, the demand for oil fell, the level of development of the manufacturing sector declined, the ruble sank considerably, demonstrating that it was a raft of flesh - a dollar brainchild raised by economists 90's and 2000's.
The confrontation between the ideas of “Glazyevtsev” and “Kudrintsev” extends not only to the Central Bank, but also to the Ministry of Finance in terms of the distribution of funds of the so-called Stabilization Fund, which was established in 2004 year.

We will try to reveal the essence of this confrontation. Let's start with the processes that took place in relation to the Stabilization Fund of the Russian Federation. So, at the moment, the Stabilization Fund consists of two parts, which in the total mass are about 5 trillion rubles. This rather impressive amount came up mainly due to the fact that in recent years relatively high oil prices remained. This is recognized by all economists without exception. Not from interest on investments in stocks, not from speculative operations in terms of playing on currency exchanges, and certainly not from an increase in the manufacturing sector in Russia, namely from the influx of petrodollar funds that are dead weight.

The first part of the Stabilization Fund is the Reserve Fund, the second is the National Welfare Fund. The amounts of these funds are tied to GDP and, in theory, should be controlled by the authorities. And, sort of like, they are controlled by them. Only here the main question is, and how exactly the control is carried out. In fact, the main principle of this control is the investment of Russian funds in foreign economies and hopes, built in the form: “well, at least it worked”. It seems that people who have the opportunity to touch the controls of the Stabilization Fund work under a kind of taboo: do what you want, but don’t invest in the real sector of the Russian economy. Roughly speaking, change rubles even for dollars, even for euros, even for pounds, but just don’t use these rubles to build new production facilities in Russia.

This is a dubious rule and is presented as a concern for the future of Russia. Like, whether you like it or not, let alone the dollar or, at worst, nothing will happen to the euro. But the Russian plant can still capture some raiders ... It turns out that the people responsible for the implementation of the Stabilization Fund work plans show complete uncertainty in the Russian economy and complete confidence in the economy of a certain number of foreign countries.

Moreover, the letter itself of one of the resolutions devoted to the work of the Stabilization Fund of Russia leads economists to certain reflections. According to the decree No. 229 of April 2006, the Ministry of Finance may invest in the securities of the governments of the following countries: Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, United Kingdom, United States.

If you look closely at the list of states, a strange pattern emerges that was discovered quite a long time ago but was not explained by the representatives of the Ministry of Finance. This pattern consists in following the names of states one after another in alphabetical order of the English language: Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxemburg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, United Kingdom, USA.

It turns out that either this is pure coincidence (an amazing coincidence), or the person who compiled this document reflects in English (that is, it is unlikely to be a person from Russia), or this document was compiled by Russians in Russia, but mainly for study by representatives of those English-speaking countries that are mentioned in the list ...

If not a coincidence, then this, as they say, will fly ... Indeed, in one and in another case the words about the focus of the work of the Stabilization Fund for the benefit of the Russians, to put it mildly, can hardly correspond to reality.

The fact that something is wrong with this RF Stabilization Fund can be judged by the information that is being disseminated by representatives of the Ministry of Finance today. The fact is that the Ministry of Finance also began to build plans for which to put a certain part of the fund’s funds into action. The Ministry of Economic Development has similar plans. But, despite the fact that both of these departments seem to be part of the same government, their plans are mutually opposed. Thus, the Ministry of Economic Development proposes to start up impressive funds for the development of the Russian real sector (building new enterprises and modernizing existing production facilities, investing in shares of Russian production companies), moreover under the state management of these investments. And the Ministry of Finance again says that this is counterproductive and can scare off foreign investors and lead to inflation risks. According to the Ministry of Finance, the Stabilization Fund money can be invested, but for this you need to create an additional company Rosfinagentstvo. They say that we will hand over trillions of this company, and let it decide for itself how best to dispose of state funds.

It turns out that the Ministry of Finance itself signs in his own helplessness in terms of managing the Stabilization Fund's financial resources. We cannot do it ourselves - we hope for smart and sober guys from Rosfinagentstva ... But who will these guys be? .. Who said that they will definitely be smart and exactly sober is time. And why did they even think that some mediators would work for the good of the citizens of the country — that’s two. Do they need it at all? ..

These same guys from Rosfinagentstva can even, excuse me, throw trillions in shares of dubious companies, get profit for themselves and their ideological inspirers and say: well, that’s what happened - stocks fell, money cried ... And do you have any other funds? ..

But if the Ministry of Finance signs in helplessness at the disposal of state funds, then in this case its head should be put on the table of the prime minister a resignation letter. We have no irreplaceable ones. Or is there? .. If Aleksey Leonidovich Kudrin will lead the Central Bank, then it turns out that there is definitely no ...

And if he takes the lead, then the direction of "development" of the Russian economy will be extremely clear. It is obvious that Kudrin himself will be supported by all those gentlemen who feel respect for the established financial system based on investments in foreign economies when they are elected to head the Central Bank or any other Kudrintsa. With such an antilobby, the eyes are unlikely to slip ... His chances that he will sit in the chair of the head of the Bank of Russia, experts estimate no higher than 1 to 10.

But if the Glazyev initiative turns out to be wiped out by the “Kudrynians”, then why did Vladimir Putin give this person the powers of an adviser? While the formula is obtained: “listen to Glazyev and do the opposite.” So what? .. Agree, a strange use of advisory initiatives ...
Author:
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

103 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Civil 7 March 2013 08: 28 New
    • 37
    • 0
    +37
    Glazyev created the Customs Union, I remember very much looking on the Internet, who is so consistently oppressing the pro-Russian line ... but hezh ... he is Serge
    1. Uncle Serozha
      Uncle Serozha 7 March 2013 10: 05 New
      • 32
      • 0
      +32
      Yes, he is a consistent supporter of the Customs Union, which will make it possible to have a domestic market necessary for a self-sufficient economy. He also advocates a “direct” issue of the ruble into the national banking system. Now the newly commissioned rubles are necessarily sent to the interbank currency exchange, where they buy dollars and euros for foreign exchange reserves. These reserves themselves are nothing more than a “stove” for burning dollars - over the past 10 years, dollar inflation has depreciated this currency by 6-7, and real estate by 10 times. We can freely dispose and invest in the economy of no more than 12% of foreign exchange reserves.
      That is, the current ruble issue mechanism is designed to support the dollar, and not the Russian economy. Glazyev is a consistent opponent of this state of affairs. Well and then - they gave one team a command, in the end, give the other.
      1. Nicholas C. 7 March 2013 12: 21 New
        • 24
        • 0
        +24
        Kudrin - a member of the team Sobchak, then Chubais. These teams, to put it mildly, have exhausted themselves.

        Glazyev has long been known. And is known for deep knowledge and YOUR concept.
        1. predator.3
          predator.3 7 March 2013 17: 36 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          According to Glazyev, Russia, as a result of endless hope in the US dollar, may find itself in a new crisis funnel, which will pull along all production sectors without exception. His main message is that the Russian economy has long been in need of quality recovery, one of the manifestations of which may be the support of the domestic producer, and not meaningless for the vast majority of citizens speculation with foreign currencies.


          But Glazyev is right, especially the so-called corporate debt of the country. According to the Bank of Russia, the volume of Russian corporate external debtand as of July 1, 2012 amounted to $ 532,2 billion. Before the crisis of 2008-2009 corporate external debt was only $ 83,9 billion
          1. igor.borov775 7 March 2013 20: 18 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Yes, what you can’t do, as CHINA does, but he smiles while listening to experts from behind a hill and does it his own way, But we can’t listen to them and even get ahead of them, Not for nothing Kudrin has already put into service too much, you need to carefully look at these expenses, True acquaintance the song is almost swan
          2. Konstantm 7 March 2013 22: 40 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Honestly, I am looking for what Lenin and I.V. said on this occasion. Stalin ------ silence. But they foresaw this, for it was ....
        2. igor.borov775 7 March 2013 20: 10 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          As they’ve exhausted everything in power, try to propose something, If it’s true that the main economic experts from the Gaidar Academy of Economics will continue to drive that policy in the economy as before, Although it is already criticizing, they repeat it like a mantra, Kudrin isn’t He lives and lives, and he himself is preparing to take a place, he constantly declares himself and always was mine,
      2. Serg_Y
        Serg_Y 7 March 2013 13: 04 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        But is this not the Chinese financial model, in my opinion the Chinese are directly making the issue of money supply, bypassing the foreign exchange market?
      3. Nick 5 May 2017 14: 45 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Uncle Serezha
        Glazyev is a consistent opponent of this state of affairs. Well and then - they gave one team a command, in the end, give the other.

        The problem is that do not change the heads of the Central Bank, but according to the Constitution, it must act as it does. It is necessary to change the goals and priorities for our Central Bank, which means to amend the Constitution.
    2. serega52 7 March 2013 12: 53 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      An article in the style of a liberal bias, to tune the masses into the ghostly prospects of Glazyev, just experts predict Glazyev for the post of Central Bank, but this is only the first step, the second most important is to change the law on the Central Bank so that it works for the Country and ceases to be an ordinary, American box office. The people are following this matter and the victory will be ours !!!
  2. Byordovvv1 7 March 2013 08: 40 New
    • 16
    • 0
    +16
    Sergei Glazyev is absolutely right and I hope that he can convince Putin of his innocence.
    1. Vadivak 7 March 2013 09: 26 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Byordovvv1
      Sergei Glazyev


      Yes, they are all oiled in one world
      13.04.2005/1/000 Glazyev bought an apartment for $ 000 A fighter with oligarchs moved into a luxurious two-story apartment in the elite house of Rina Romanov From the last floor of the Scarlet Sails, a beautiful view of Moscow opens. he himself joined a decent life.
      1. SHOCK. 7 March 2013 10: 01 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        If we do not have “the best of the best,” then at least there will be the best of the worst.
        1. Genur 7 March 2013 13: 44 New
          • -1
          • 0
          -1
          Do not forget that Kudrin, it seems, was in favor of GDP.
      2. Uncle Serozha
        Uncle Serozha 7 March 2013 10: 21 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Vadivak

        Yes, they are all oiled in one world

        In general, I also have a shadow of doubt. And not even because of the apartment, but here's why. Six months ago, few in the general public knew the difference in the approach of the Glazyev and Kudrinsk teams. And suddenly there was "mass insight" and everyone started talking about the stabilization fund, etc.
        Such a quickly emerging love for Glazyev is very similar to the result of a massive PR company. It is possible that we are again being manipulated. Yes, Glazyev’s arguments seem weighty to me. But how many times did the arguments that actually turned out to be completely wrong seem to us weighty?
        It seems to me that Glazyev is right, but those who control our “seem” money receive for a reason. Yes, I have doubts ...
        1. wax
          wax 7 March 2013 13: 47 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          Glazyev always had a concept of development (since EBNovskih times). He is one of the developers of the economic part of the Communist Party’s program (because no one else liked his views. Therefore, he moved into the shadows. If Putin began to listen to Glazyev, then there is a chance for the development of the real sector of the economy. But Glazyev should not be put on the Central Bank, but on Premiere (then, by the way, the position of the Central Bank will be changed almost automatically).
        2. Nick 7 March 2013 20: 22 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: Uncle Serezha
          Yes, Glazyev’s arguments seem weighty to me. But how many times did the arguments that actually turned out to be completely wrong seem to us weighty?

          Yes, Glazyev expressed his arguments fifteen years ago, too long a "maneuver" for the PR company. Most likely, Glazyev wants to achieve precisely the changes in the financial system and macroeconomics that he is talking about. No more. Another thing is if someone uses it to achieve their hidden goals ... but this is already conspiracy thesis ...
      3. VAF
        VAF 7 March 2013 12: 14 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        Quote: Vadivak
        Yes, they are all oiled in one world


        Hello, hello! I agree with the expression, +! But according to Glazyev (what exactly this applies to him) recourse ...... not really, because :

        1. The highest paid position is a financial and economic consultant, and Glazyev is really a "light" in this matter and his .. "services" are used by everyone .... "the most influential and wealthy people" in the Russian Federation .. therefore .. income in 1 lyam.zeleni.eto ... seeds!

        2. The change of "Kudrinsky" to .. "Glazyevsky" is theoretically possible for two reasons:

        - The GDP has finally “realized”, then the “general course” of the great and best economist in the world is the path to the abyss (the question that the Great and Almighty is worried about his reputation ... I’m not even considering wassat )

        - even a change to the “glazyevskys” will not fundamentally change anything ... I hope no one needs to explain why bully

        So .. as they say in Rostov ... "went dvizhuha" and no more, unfortunately! recourse
        1. aksakal 7 March 2013 13: 07 New
          • 7
          • 0
          +7
          Quote: vaf
          - even a change to the “glazyevskys” will not fundamentally change anything ... I hope no one needs to explain why

          - Greetings, Waf!
          Still very interesting, why? Glazyev and Kudrin - twin brothers? Or different people with different views on the same problem?
          Kudrin and Co. are, in my opinion, pure financiers, (for now, we will leave aside the suspicions that they are generally agents of the State Department’s influence, although criticism from Kudrin’s decision to rearm the Russian army precisely during Kudrin’s visit to America raises vague suspicions) , and financiers have an ideal formula for making a profit - this is “money -> money” without an unnecessary intermediate stage of the “product” type. This link, in their opinion, is redundant and carries extra "bones" and risks. This is in addition to the headaches associated with the production of goods.
          I came across this opinion - there are grandmas, why turn it into a pile of iron and concrete? Return returns are not guaranteed. It’s better to buy grandmothers who have paper, similar papers that simply say that they “have a pile of iron and metal”, wait for them to rise in price, and again return the grandmothers in an already increased size. And with this money to feed the population, which will not need to be driven into this pile of metal and concrete.
          In principle, all actions with the Stabilization Fund are similar to this. And no one bears responsibility for the fact that pieces of paper with the words "a pile of iron and concrete" may never rise in price or even disappear. These are high-risk financial speculations, how can one be held responsible for this? The oscillations of en are fundamentally not predictable -)))). Although this is a question, are they unpredictable? Price fluctuations are chaotic rather than random, i.e. It has hidden patterns that are not observed by the naked eye. And who rules these patterns (they are called market makers - doing trade) and what comes to his mind is a big question.
          I am concerned about a very simple question - when will “long” (over 15 years) money appear on the terms of 3-4% per annum in our rich states? This is an important issue that has not been resolved for 20 years. A lot of good production projects are dead weight, because they "go" under business plans with a maximum of 7% per annum, and at 14%, and even short ones, they do not want to go to bed. 14% of short ones - this is for traders - delivered what, shoved, returned.
          Let me remind you that AvtoVAZ was built on an Italian loan of 1.5 billion for a period of 20 years at 5% per annum. The Italians wanted to give at 7%, but even such a promising project did not pull the 7%. Here 1% plays a crucial role.
          1. brutal true 7 March 2013 14: 42 New
            • -1
            • 0
            -1
            They found someone to explain ... Mr. vaf lives in another, as I understand it, Tsarist Russia. There they have laws and a constitution - that's it, nonsense. They have the king appointed the boyars everywhere, and they do what the autocrat wishes. Otherwise, the head from the shoulders. wassat lol
          2. igor.borov775 7 March 2013 20: 27 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Never, if you take such a system, you need to change everything and these cool specialists, They don’t need your aspirations, they have one problem not to give
          3. Botanologist 8 March 2013 21: 08 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            In principle, all actions with the Stabilization Fund are similar to this.

            In principle, actions with the Stabilization Fund - it is more likely to be repayable to Amers. And this, as you know, has nothing to do with economics. This is politics.

            I am concerned about a very simple question - when will “long” (over 15 years) money appear on the terms of 3-4% per annum in our rich states? This is an important issue that has not been resolved for 20 years.

            And another 20 years you will not see. The economy will not pull such guarantees.
            1. Serg_Y
              Serg_Y 8 March 2013 21: 43 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              When everyone stops the printing press, or we switch to the Chinese financial model, for me the first option is more interesting because cleverer.
            2. aksakal 8 March 2013 22: 42 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Greetings, Botanologist!
              Two questions for your answer:
              1) the mechanism of the impact of amers on the Russians is not entirely clear, what kind of leverage do they have so that we meekly give such amounts? Russian strategic nuclear weapons exclude power leverage. The organization of the "orange" unrest? - Russian law, the security system is quite effective in countering this ... What is this lever?
              2) what are the warranties? Is it possible in more detail? And if we don’t “pull” everyone who wants to get such a loan, why not start selectively - at least with well-known defense industry enterprises?
              1. Serg_Y
                Serg_Y 8 March 2013 23: 02 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                I think the main interest on our part is world integration, the world revolution did not work, because the capitalists were rebuilt in time, there was the second world war, which also tempered our ardor, the loss in the Cold War completely cooled us, but as they say if Magamet does not go to the mountain, then the mountain goes to Magamet. If the capitalist system cannot be destroyed, then it can be tamed (the film "Island" "Why don’t you hit the center, and the patam that some of the underground want to use the towers in their own way), for this, integration into the global financial system and non-uniformity of the tandem political system GDP and DAM: DAM people don’t want to lose the financial center, so they launched the printing press so that we can get out of it, and to finance China, because for him the financial center is like a red rag for a bull. finance vy center remained in the US, and machines stopped, then we will stay in the global integration, the refinancing rate will start to fall. That's something like that.
        2. Oleg14774 7 March 2013 17: 20 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: vaf
          Yes, they are all oiled in one world

          Now, if the nationalization of the Bank of Russia had taken place, then it would have spoken about something, otherwise it is quite possible that we are being fooled. Delay all something!
      4. Nick 7 March 2013 20: 12 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        Quote: Vadivak
        The most fierce fighter with the oligarchs, the leader of the Movement for a Dignified Life, Sergei Glazyev himself joined a decent life.

        And according to yours, Glazyev should go in rags, or what? Well, yes, a ruse to invent fiction ... Only beggars will save Russia ...
        I think that Russia is more useful to patriotic professionals, with the exception of professional beggars, cheaters, crooks and other professionally parasitic elements on the body of the people.
        Sincerely ... hi
  3. piterkras
    piterkras 7 March 2013 08: 49 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    Our Stabilization Fund in America is a tribute to Russia before America for losing to them in the Cold War. The USA is the Tatar-Mongol yoke of our days. It’s not easy to get finances out of there. Slightly that America will immediately make us such a small crisis, having artificially lowered oil prices with its Arabs.
  4. engineer74 7 March 2013 09: 02 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    In the current situation, the withdrawal of Russian money from Western economies could provoke the Chinese to similar actions. The consequences of this option are unpredictable, but when you need to start. Good luck to S. Glazyev!
    IMHO
    1. Nick 7 March 2013 20: 42 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: engineer74
      In the current situation, the withdrawal of Russian money from Western economies could provoke the Chinese to similar actions. The consequences of this option are unpredictable.

      The main thing is not to make sudden movements. Then the global economy will have time to adapt to gradual changes in the financial sector.
  5. butch 7 March 2013 09: 11 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Kudrin’s policy was to keep ordinary people starving, to feed foreign economies with our “safety cushion” so that “wise men” would not have time to invest in their own country. I’ll pray that Putin would have the will to appoint Glazyev. It’s time already, it’s time “The jury has broken the ice - the ice has broken !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! yes
    1. ultra 7 March 2013 17: 37 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: butch
      Kudrinskaya policy was to keep ordinary people starving,

      Kudrin says that economic growth is possible without the infusion of state funds, it’s enough to make a normal investment climate in the country! Bureaucracy. Corruption, is the main brake on investment! Glazyev wants to make the state the main investor, ONE BUT, how much money will go to real projects, when I’m not so much afraid of the current state of affairs! hi
      1. aksakal 8 March 2013 00: 46 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Ultra, although I do not really like the contents of your post, I am forced to admit for you a certain correctness - ((((((.
        True, one of the great said that corruption is the lot of poor countries, it is the population’s response to the poor. With wealth, the level of corruption decreases. The richest countries - Norway, its Scandinavian neighbors, even the despicable Qatar - have a very low level of corruption. From the point of view of the theory of complex systems, corruption phenomena are an indispensable condition for the existence of systems with a small energy reserve
      2. luka095
        luka095 8 March 2013 22: 18 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Dear ultra, and you do not notice a distortion in the words of Kudrin quoted by you? Why can one not invest state funds in a normal investment climate? Why "or" - "or"? If there are funds - they should work - Glazyev is certainly right in this. But Kudrin and others like them are focusing on private funds, declaring government investments ineffective in advance. And why should they be highly effective? They must create the conditions for a highly efficient economy. By the way, this happened almost everywhere in the world — in the USA (Roosevelt’s new course), in Germany (under Hitler - a network of highways and not only, i.e. investments in infrastructure), in the UK (nationalization under Labor - modernization - privatization already with the Tories), Therefore, the state assumed the burden of modernization in these countries. Yes, she does not give immediate profits. Therefore, the private sector is in no hurry to invest in it.
    2. Nick 7 March 2013 20: 49 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: butch
      . I’m going to pray that Putin has the will to appoint Glazyev. It’s time, it’s time "The jury has begun to break ice - the ice has broken !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      I think the “Washington Regional Committee” will put a lot of pressure on him, but Putin 2.0, unlike Putin the first, who first came to power through the “official entrance”, received so much support from the people in the elections, so much so that he I hope to stand it.
  6. DeerIvanovich
    DeerIvanovich 7 March 2013 09: 13 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    I hope I have enough glazyev to put in charge at the head, despite the counter-actions of the corrupt elite
    1. RAMBO
      RAMBO 7 March 2013 22: 37 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Yes, if Volodya doesn’t beat the Central Bank in favor of the state now, all his plans for a seven-year withdrawal of the country from colonization are another fake
  7. aleks71
    aleks71 7 March 2013 09: 17 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Glazyev, Ignatyev, Kudrin .... What kind of lobbies are with our people ... Where do we live? There, as I understand it, nobody at all? Someone writes laws harmful to the Russian state, some kind of nonsense ... Russian people he had the honor and confidence of the GDP by choosing him as his leader, and therefore let him make it difficult for himself, he takes a scythe and mowing all sorts of dirty tricks from running the country. Time passes, and patience ends .. And sometimes you read, it's not the president, but the victim of palace intrigues, damn, such an observer, on which nothing depends ... I understand: undertook to do, DO! We will support.
    1. Boris55 7 March 2013 10: 21 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      ... As I understand it: I undertook to do - DO! We will support ...

      Here is 24 and see how we support it ...
    2. igor.borov775 7 March 2013 21: 00 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      What are you talking about, Lord, he dreams of better times, Yes, we have built a freak country for 20 years, we can’t figure it out ourselves, Take the Chinese billionaires, well, they build palaces for themselves and everyone knows whose they are, When asked and what the Chinese politely answer, yes, they build and you know how much he built for us for his money, And clinics and children’s schools and some kind of sport complex are building for us all in the city, And ask us who is building the palace and in the face you will get a COMMERCIAL SECRET, This is probably only we have such a mess even a house a secret and if you look at how they open firms and cover, As they say one-day and quickly and without hassle, And after all, such things are not tracked over the hill watching and tracking, As Medvedev resisted the confiscation of property when he was president, We do not have corruption in the sense that they tell us something built here another, Some kind of system of withdrawing money from the budget and it functions as a state power, and this is much more serious than it seems,
  8. Ostanin
    Ostanin 7 March 2013 09: 20 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    So let's see what the policy of our president and the State Duma is oriented after this appointment, given that the head of the Central Bank is appointed by the State Duma on the proposal of the President. And then it hurts they all say the right and necessary things, but in reality it turns out the opposite.
    1. SSR
      SSR 7 March 2013 15: 53 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Ostanin
      when you consider that the head of the Central Bank is appointed by the State Duma on the proposal of the President.

      Here it is))) I really want to see which party will vote for Mr. Ulyukaev or Kudrin and which party is against Glazyev.
      and then our "servants" of the State Duma adopt laws .. and then speaking on TV, they begin to blame everything on opponents.
    2. igor.borov775 7 March 2013 21: 05 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Nothing interesting Who will be called and chosen
  9. zambo
    zambo 7 March 2013 09: 21 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The struggle for the post of the Central Bank, and therefore for the future investment of funds in the development of our industry, is almost more important than the struggle that was waged, and still is, in the Ministry of Defense. MO, it seems, have defended, the Central Bank is in line, we will wait, nothing depends on us.
  10. askort154 7 March 2013 09: 31 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    The West’s love for Kudrin is alarming, therefore I trust Glazyev more.
    1. elmi 7 March 2013 12: 02 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Why be surprised if Kudrina was appointed the best finance minister of the year in 2010 by the West, I am still surprised how nothing was awarded to Chubais. It’s just that the West will not give up, it will do everything to appoint Kudrin or Ulyukaev
  11. Boris55 7 March 2013 10: 07 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    At one time, Glazyev proposed, following the example of the redhead, to divide all the bowels ... i.e. one divided everything at the top, gave two Volga to each, and Glazyev means two barrels of gas to them ...
    Well, I don’t know what will come of it ... if only as a transitional option ...
    1. Tektor 7 March 2013 15: 05 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      There’s already no time for all kinds of transitional options ...
      http://new.aftershock.su/?q=node/25094
      The deadline is May, otherwise we will be completely crushed by the Amerzians. Let me remind you that they adopted the Dodd-Frank Act, which imposes restrictions on tax evaders - US citizens. And with this sauce they demand from all countries to present to them the accounts of ALL persons who have deposits in banks of all countries in order to calculate their draft tax evaders. All states must sign an agreement on this matter with state authorities. If any state does not do this, then any transfers of this state will be taxed at 30% to compensate for the terrible losses ...
      The only option to maintain an independent financial system is to create an autonomous national payment system, the participants of which will be exclusively Russian citizens and legal entities with 100% ownership of Russian citizens. That is why we began to introduce UEC.
    2. brutal true 7 March 2013 15: 06 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Naturally, transitional. In any case, the constitution must be changed. And Glazyev, yes, with his cockroaches
    3. psdf
      psdf 8 March 2013 02: 06 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Boris55

      At one time, Glazyev proposed, following the example of the redhead, to divide all the bowels ... i.e. one divided everything at the top, gave two Volga to each, and Glazyev means two barrels of gas to them ...

      Do not be fooled - as far as I remember, it was a question of natural rent. One type of tax on mining companies.
  12. deman73 7 March 2013 10: 07 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    it's time for us to invest our money in our country
  13. baskoy 7 March 2013 10: 13 New
    • 20
    • 0
    +20
    If I, an entrepreneur, at the insistence of my wife, give away the income from my business to a neighbor (also to my competitor), and I run around to other neighbors, trying to persuade me to invest in my business - EVERYTHING is clear that my wife and my neighbor are giving me horns. Well, or I myself substitute him for the back ... y. Everything is absolutely clear to any village old woman and she will 100% predict my future!
    You don’t even have to be a seedy economist to understand the idiocy of the situation!
    1. baltika-18 7 March 2013 12: 00 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: baskoy
      If I, an entrepreneur, at the insistence of my wife, give away the income from my business to a neighbor (also to my competitor), and I run around to other neighbors, trying to persuade me to invest in my business - EVERYTHING is clear that my wife and my neighbor are giving me horns. Well, or I myself substitute him for the back ... y. Everything is absolutely clear to any village old woman and she will 100% predict my future!
      You don’t even have to be a seedy economist to understand the idiocy of the situation

      The most sensible comment of all.
      1. igor.borov775 7 March 2013 21: 10 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        The most accurate diagnosis of our fin system,
    2. elmi 7 March 2013 12: 10 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      It is sad that only recently began to see clearly. Investing our hard-earned money in foreign economies is a betrayal of Russia! drive these pro-Western liberals into the neck
    3. brutal true 7 March 2013 15: 12 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: baskoy
      If I, an entrepreneur, at the insistence of my wife, give away the income from my business to a neighbor (also to my competitor), and I run around other neighbors, persuading me to invest in my business

      Not even that. You give back to your neighbor at 2%, and you re-borrow from him 8% each, and you stand on his hind legs, because he may not.
    4. scrack
      scrack 7 March 2013 23: 59 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Many politicians still believe that ordinary people do not understand the economy, but in practice the opposite
  14. SHOCK. 7 March 2013 10: 55 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    <Recall that in the midst of a corporate dispute in the Rusal’s supervisory board, the ears of the financial oligarchy of the Old World unexpectedly surfaced - Baron Nathaniel Rothschild, who, judging by a series of lawsuits, is the real owner of Deripaska’s repeatedly mortgaged assets, unexpectedly surfaced. >
    <The media have long been rumored that Oleg Deripaska, as well as his long-time friend Roman Abramovich, are integrated at the lower levels of the European financial oligarchy and act as advocates for the interests of the Rothschilds and several other bankers in Russia. >
    I personally like GLAZYEV. But it’s very difficult to turn the tide. There must be a combination of actions and support from higher ones.
    After all, in addition to imported vultures, there are also domestic ones, but I don’t give a lot of money anyway, they’ll steal it anyway.
  15. skullcap 7 March 2013 11: 06 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Material in the topic:
    Scientists urged Putin to stop selling off state property
    By the address:
    http://oko-planet.su/politik/newsday/170521-uchenye-prizvali-putina-prekratit-ra
    sprodazhu-gosimuschestva.html
  16. Ascetic 7 March 2013 11: 24 New
    • 24
    • 0
    +24
    Quote: Sh.O.K.
    I personally like GLAZYEV. But it’s very difficult to turn the tide. There must be a combination of actions and support from higher ones.
    After all, in addition to imported vultures, there are also domestic ones, but I don’t give a lot of money anyway, they’ll steal it anyway.


    Glazyev is primarily in favor of lowering the Central Bank refinancing interest rate. And a more active Central Bank policy to support the development of domestic industry and agriculture. Lowering the interest rate is primarily cheap long-term loans for a normal productive business, and not for a speculative oligarchic one which has access to the cheap long money of foreign banks controlled by the same Fed. due to which it gets a competitive advantage, all other things being equal. Therefore, in our media belonging to all the same liberal compradors, an active "anti-Glazyev or prokudrinsky campaign" is being waged. Personally, the ex-Minister of Finance Alexei Kudrin, a light of Russian liberals and the ideological “Gaidar”, spoke in the spirit that
    «
    these are the views of an advanced Soviet economist who does not know the parameters of monetary policy - neither Western nor Russian. Glazyev remained in the past, they thought so 20 years ago. ”

    In the same way as Chubais, who declared Glazyev either a false economist or a mentally ill person,
    By the way, Glazyev graduated with honors from Moscow State University with a degree in cyber economics and became the youngest doctor of economic sciences and academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Where there, the Kudrin threesome from LSU or the “geshefter” Chubais, against the background of Glazyev, just looks like a two-man in a secondary school in a rural settlement.
    It is not surprising that it was foreign banking associations and financial publications that recognized the Russian Minister of Finance three times as the best Minister of Finance in the world, Europe and developing countries, appreciating Alexey Kudrin's contribution to the bleeding of the Russian economy and priority financing for modernization in the USA, EU, Japan, etc.
    Apparently, back in 2011. on the eve of his “scandalous” and “unexpected” resignation (due to the fact that Putin did not give him the post of head of government), one of the senior officials promised him the post of chairman of the Bank of Russia for maintaining loyalty to the Kremlin and moderate liberal criticism. And, fearing the arrival of Academician Sergei Glazyev to the Bank of Russia and the reformatting of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation from the currency exchanger and the US Federal Reserve branch into a full-fledged development institution, we see the indefatigable aggression of the liberals on Glazyev in recent weeks.
    Glazyev well outlined his position in the article "Why I agreed to become a confidant of Vladimir Putin and support his candidacy in the presidential elections in Russia". You can read and compare with the cynical and anti-state position of the Chubais-Kudrins
    link
    1. SHOCK. 7 March 2013 14: 08 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Plus of course.
    2. Begemot 7 March 2013 14: 23 New
      • -5
      • 0
      -5
      A small remark: the refinancing rate does not affect the cheapness of the loan, these are not related concepts. And I agree about Glazyev and Kudrin, the militant liberal pro-Western Kudrin, all the time as minister, he struggled with the low ruble exchange rate, under the guise of fighting inflation, thus giving privileges to foreign companies against Russian ones. Under the same pretext, he pumped money out of the economy, placing it in the Federation Council and FBS over the hill.
      1. brutal true 7 March 2013 15: 31 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Begemot

        A small remark: the refinancing rate does not affect the cheapness of the loan, these are not related concepts

        Hello, refinancing rate - this is the interest on the loan. Of course, what difference does it make, 0.5% as in Europe or 8,5% as in Russia, Where is it cheaper to take a loan ?!
        1. Begemot 7 March 2013 16: 27 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          It is difficult to argue with ordinary people, the REF rate does not affect the price of the loan, this is a common misconception, rather, it is formed on the basis of assessing the value of loans, but does not affect them in any way. This is mainly the discount rate for calculating taxes on interest income. Learn the mat part.
          1. brutal true 7 March 2013 18: 10 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Begemot
            It is difficult to argue with the townsfolk, the REF rate does not affect the price of the loan

            Loan cost - means that the borrower pays to the lender for using the loan. The main components of S.k. are the interest rate commissions, various fees, insurance premium. To the main elements usually include those that are paid directly to the creditor, and to the additional ones that are received by third parties. Hidden elements of CK may be included in the loan price, compensating for creditors a decrease in the nominal size of the interest rate. (with). Encyclopedic Dictionary of Economics and Law
            Dear, you are showing yourself from a very unsightly side. In two of your posts, you did not present anything other than your unfounded beliefs.
            1. Begemot 11 March 2013 11: 58 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              I repeat, it is very difficult to argue with the townsfolk !! For 20 years of work in banks, I have never met a situation where the refinancing rate determined the price of a loan. The REF rate is used as the discount rate for calculating the tax base of interest income and expenses. A decrease or increase in it occurs as a result of a change in the interest policy of banks, and certainly not vice versa. Teach, and once again learn materiel.
              Loan rates are determined by the ratio of loan demand to money supply on the market, while demand is understood as not the desire of a homeless person to take a bubble by tomorrow and not an ardent desire to get a loan from Ulybka LLC, which has 2 with a hole in it and a bundle of paper, but the need for quality borrowers who are able to repay funds received on credit with interest on time.
              And as for the negative REF rate - do not flatter yourself - this is usually an indicator of the desperate situation of foreign trade (typical of Japan), when the purchase of the Yen continues even after interventions,
              the Japanese simply lower their rates below zero in order to pump up their economies with money and increase the competitiveness of their goods, rather than finance the currency speculation of the same Americans.
              1. Serg_Y
                Serg_Y 11 March 2013 13: 51 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                "For 20 years of work in banks, I have never met a situation where the refinancing rate determined the price of a loan"
                "Rates on loans are determined by the ratio of demand for credit and money supply in the market"
                "The Japanese simply lower rates below zero to pump money into their economies and increase the competitiveness of their products."
                Those. The refinancing rate determines the cost of the loan, or I have something with logic. I agree that this is indirect, but a derivative, but as an indicator in my opinion the most important.
      2. igor.borov775 7 March 2013 21: 17 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Why are you if the Central Bank rate is 8,5%, who will give you lower from the banks, the respected one influences how it affects you, Have you not noticed this for so many years? I'm sorry
        1. Ascetic 7 March 2013 21: 58 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          Quote: igor.borov775
          Why are you if the Central Bank rate is 8,5%, who will give you lower from the banks, the respected one influences how it affects you, Have you not noticed this for so many years? I'm sorry


          Worldwide, business is developing through loans. AND the size of the credit rate is crucial. If it is too high, then it makes sense to invest only in fast-paced projects. And this is primarily trade. I bought it here, sold it there, quickly made a profit and paid off the debt.
          In science-intensive industries that require huge investments (aircraft, machine tools, energy, etc.), it may take 10, or even 20 years, from the development of a product to its production and sale and, consequently, profit-making. It is clear that in conditions of expensive lending no one will invest in them. It’s easier to put money in a bank at interest. or invest in expensive real estate, otherwise a bunch of cut pieces of paper called money will depreciate. A small business, for which the proposed rates are even more unbearable, just folds. Today, the rate on loans for businesses with very good collateral is 12%, the average is about 15%. In order for our industry to get a boost, rates need to be reduced at least by half.

          Complaints of citizens at high rates come in huge numbers. Therefore, we submitted to the State Duma a bill according to which the regulator (the Central Bank - for banks, the Federal Service for Financial Markets - for microfinance organizations) can set the maximum rate for each type of loan. For individuals - double the size of the market average. Say, if the average rate for mortgage loans is 14%, the maximum cannot be more than 28%. However Ministry of Finance (criticized the bill, saying that rates should be regulated by the market. Meanwhile, in countries with developed market economies, such restrictions exist. In France, the maximum loan rate cannot exceed 30% of the average.


          Anatoly Aksakov, President of the Association of Regional Banks of Russia
          1. aksakal 8 March 2013 03: 02 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Ascetic, categorically welcome!
            Above I posted as an answer to VAF, not knowing about your posts, I’ve got acquainted with pleasure right now! I am glad that our opinions are just very close, I am pleased! For a plus -)))));
      3. scrack
        scrack 8 March 2013 00: 07 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Banks issue loans to the public from the funds that they have. These funds are formed from loans from the Central Bank, respectively, if you received a loan from money that was borrowed from the Central Bank, the interest rate will be exactly higher than the refinancing rate
        1. brutal true 8 March 2013 01: 23 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: scrack
          accordingly, if you received a loan from money that was borrowed from the Central Bank, the interest rate will be exactly higher than the refinancing rate

          By itself. 8.5 is the interbank rate. For consumers, it goes 18-28%.
  17. shkil2010 7 March 2013 11: 25 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Exactly! Their vultures, which are worse, are interested in nothing changing, this is the fifth column. But it’s easier with them - their little hands can be “shortened” here too, only until something is done for Putin himself ...
  18. saruman 7 March 2013 11: 30 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The current monetary leadership (the Ministry of Finance, the Central Bank), as well as a large half of the ministries, are “cosmopolitan liberals” (that is, working more for the benefit of the West and its patterns). These people have good theoretical support in the form of the Higher School of Economics, INSOR, etc. Further rule of these people will lead Russia to collapse. This even Putin began to understand.

    Therefore, "liberal nationalists" - conditionally "glazyovtsy" were needed. This group wants to use the tools and ideas of the liberal economy for the emergence of national (Russian) capital oriented to Russia as a center of their income and capital growth. This group is not particularly popular, neither in power, nor among the people. They have few ideologues and horns. Only the publicist Nikonov comes to mind.

    In the current situation, in order to maintain power and possibly Russia, Putin has no other choice but to rely on "liberal nationalists." Well, Putin will not rely on the Communist Party! In addition, the Communist Party will require carte blanche, that is, at least the Premier’s post, and two-thirds of government portfolios and time guarantees. Putin will not do this! Therefore - the "glazyivtsi"!
    BUT! The old "liberals" just will not give up their piece of the pie. Let’s see if Putin’s spirit is enough, or if he’ll be blown away again and back down, as has happened more than once (Putin tried to take control of the Central Bank twice - and all to no avail).
    1. SHOCK. 7 March 2013 14: 18 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: saruman
      Putin has no other choice but to rely on "liberal nationalists"


      I would like to speak out about this, but ...... better not say anything.
  19. Goldmitro 7 March 2013 11: 35 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    <<< For this reason, the correspondence struggle between the “Zolovets” and “Kudrintsy” is planned. The former believe that money should work within the country and for the country, the latter are sure that this is populism, and that foreign partners should continue to be trusted: they say that future generations should be somehow protected from economic shocks >>>
    Enough time has passed and it is already clear WHO is HU, so that it is the President who has now made a principled decision - WHO must steer Russia's finances. If it will be the same team of “Kudrintsy”, liberals of marketers of the Gaidar spill, who has been chasing Russian money for a hill for 10 years, ostensibly to guarantee greater safety, then the Russian economy will stagnate and continue because of the lack of funds for it development and grandiose plans announced by the President for the development of the economy, the creation of millions of jobs will remain only on paper with the consequences for his image. If it will be a team of "glazyevtsev", then there is a real hope for the implementation of these plans. On the government, stupidly continuing to follow in the wake of Gaidar's pro-Western economic policy, NO are reliable. Only the President, by his willful decision, is now able to give Russia the vector of development that is aimed, finally, at the real development of the economy.
  20. someone 7 March 2013 11: 57 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Although I do not have broad knowledge of the economy, and not so much in politics and undercover games, I draw some conclusions from my belfry now (thanks to this site and the people here).
    It seems to me that recently Russia has nevertheless been rising slowly from its knees. And God willing, our power will still show America and its henchmen who is who.
    And Wang is not in vain (I hope) prophesied the great future of Russia.
    IMHO.
  21. washi 7 March 2013 12: 24 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    From the USSR of Russia, a bunch of breakthrough technologies swept through. For their implementation, as usual, there is no money. Why not support the scientists. Moreover, the GDP gravitates not toward Oskolkovo, but towards the Soviet Academy towns, around which, fortunately, not all industries were ruined. High-tech products do not sell poorly even during times of crisis. I would like to remind you that the first cassette video recorders were used here, hydrofoils, ekranoplans, parallel-resolution computers (multi-core computers), etc.
    1. elmi 7 March 2013 12: 42 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      And it turns out as always - we buy most of our developments from the west. We are able to invent, but to promote to the market is a disaster.
  22. elmi 7 March 2013 12: 27 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Quote: saruman
    Let’s see if Putin’s spirit is enough, or if he’ll be blown away again and back down, as has happened more than once (Putin tried to take control of the Central Bank twice - and all to no avail).

    Well, what forces are involved if the president himself cannot appoint the head of the Central Bank. You begin to involuntarily respect the work of the CIA
  23. ovgorskiy 7 March 2013 12: 40 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Liked a comment from violettaru (Today, 11: 36)

    ...... Liberals want to shake up the last state property - the soul hurts ... It’s good that I don’t have one. Scientists have taken. We need to talk about this loudly - you can’t give up what belongs to the people! It is impossible to transfer to private hands what was built and created by the work of generations! They say that "private property is more efficient." Build yourself a factory, factory, dam - and own it, prove its "effectiveness" - who would mind if the country benefits? Your merit. And if some oligarch sits and tells everyone what “effective owner” he is, I would like to ask - how did you get this popular good? I predict that for this, any oligarch will find an answer, some justification, but he will talk about some manipulations with paper assets ... In general, all this privatization with state assets is a BIG SCAM and a hoax. In my eyes, any oligarch is a swindler and a rogue who cunningly arrogated to himself that which does not belong to him, stole from the people ... And it’s not a shame to speak out and flaunt the camera. The same Prokhorov, also to me, the "owner" ... I didn’t sleep at night, did you build a nickel plant in Norilsk? He invested all his savings, organized construction on permafrost, brought in specialists? An upstart that successfully integrated into the system in the 90s and that’s all ... Yes, and they all are ...
    If Putin will allow to sell the public good, if the state does not have property, then a state loan is needed? If everything can be bought and sold? Then they will take up the land. Are the areas to buy up dealers. There’s money, the Fed will print how many tons of green is needed, but now you don’t need to print it either - they will print the zeroes in the computer payment system and business! In the world there is a global schemer - the United States, not by washing, so they try to take everything in their hands ... Can we really let Russia sell out? ....
    100% agree!
  24. Cheloveck
    Cheloveck 7 March 2013 13: 01 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Glazyev, Ignatiev, Kudrin .... What is the difference?
    Until the Central Bank is nationalized, there is no difference.
    Whoever heads it will dance to the tune of the Fed and the World Bank.

    GDP in 2000 tried, an stone flower and is still there.

    http://www.rusidea.org/?a=33002
  25. vseprosto
    vseprosto 7 March 2013 13: 30 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    ..... And sometimes you read, it’s not the president, but the victim of palace intrigues, damn it, such an observer on whom nothing depends ... I understand that he undertook to do it, DO! We will support.


    So what's the problem?
    Let's support !!!!
    Mattress makers are not going to give up so easily.
    Plus, our 5th column. So the pressure he is experiencing is not weak.
    Therefore, the support of the PEOPLE is needed.
    So it's time to do business, and not sit at home and think that someone will change something for us.
    Organize rallies in support of the president in cities with millionaires, on Saturday or Sunday, so as not to interrupt people from work. HOW SO.
    1. I think so 7 March 2013 17: 21 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      What rallies? What are you speaking about? Rallies to FORCING the president to do their job? Are you in the mind? To the idler these rallies are up to the bulb (if he still hasn’t done anything worthwhile). Especially a fool (if he does not understand what and how to do).
  26. Begemot 7 March 2013 13: 32 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    You can argue as much as you want why money is not invested in your economy, nothing will change from this, because SF and FBS are feeders,
    no matter what interest they would officially receive, they would not declare it for these investments - there are very few fools who place such a breakthrough of money at a regular percentage in very long-term assets, probably, besides us, there are also China and a couple of other non-advanced economies. At one time, being in Zurich and discussing the opening of correspondent accounts, I received several times proposals for a special account mode if 15-20 million dollars were placed on it for a long time. Those. they directly offered bribes, and when they found out that 150 million was being prepared for placement, their eyes lit up like fireworks. In one bank, they even managed to issue a credit card with a limit of 15000 overhangs in half an hour and tried to give them to me. So, the impeccable reputation of Western business is a myth, for such a jackpot as the Federation Council and FBS they will roll off so much that they can not be taken to Gazelle. Someone will invest this money in the Russian economy, it’s a few years to wait until they give income, but the income is not for one's beloved, but for some state, but this is a big difference.
    1. igor.borov775 7 March 2013 21: 30 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Gentlemen, China is already cautious of the enthusiasm in the purchase of American bonds is no longer there and therefore put pressure on him
  27. rem
    rem 7 March 2013 14: 28 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    In fact, now there is a war for the future of Russia. If the Kudrin team comes to the Central Bank gradually, Russia will come. It’s all about long-term cheap credits that the Kudrin team does not issue at the direction of the IMF, nobody needs competitors in the person of Russia. For information, the interest rate on loans to the United States is 0,25%, Japan is 0,75%, England is 0,2%, China is 0.25% (that is, the state also pays you more), Russia-8%. Any questions?
  28. Galinanp 7 March 2013 15: 09 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Kudrin is an explicit agent of the IMF. He continually makes explicit and camouflaged references to the framework of the instructions of the leadership of this department of the United States on world financial control. It will be difficult for Putin to push Glazyev to this post due to the huge resistance of the occupation machine in the form of the government and the State Duma. Stepashin recently spoke about this power of opposition in an interview about Putin’s law on the Accounts Chamber (the essence of the law is to give unlimited powers to the Accounts Chamber when auditing any government agency or private company and giving the FSB its support). The point here is mainly that the plans, after Glazyev’s approval as head of the Central Bank, begin to reorganize him into the State Bank, and this will practically block the channel for feeding the US global parasite.
  29. washi 7 March 2013 15: 09 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    There is only one question - who benefits from this?
  30. elmi 7 March 2013 15: 16 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    It is depressing that without us they decide everything, it remains to hope that our patriotic statements on the "ethereal" level will at least somehow influence the adoption of the right decision, otherwise all this is an empty air shake
  31. Orion
    Orion 7 March 2013 16: 03 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    That is why the Central Bank

    1. Serg_Y
      Serg_Y 7 March 2013 23: 47 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      What hang noodles on the ears, the purchase of rubles in the foreign exchange market is one of the emission mechanisms, but it is the cheapest, because their bucks change into rubles, the rest of the issue is through lending, the interest rate of which is tied to the refinancing rate. The fact that the sale of raw materials is more cost-effective than the launch of some kind of production is a question for low MET.
  32. Internal combustion engine 7 March 2013 16: 12 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    To me personally, with the direction of the development of the Russian economy, everything became clear with the election of Putin for a third term. Nothing good is to be expected. How can a person, being in such a high post as the president, not see all these threats and opportunities mentioned in the article? Well, only if he is stupid like a traffic jam or consciously turns a blind eye to the liberal destruction of the state.
  33. Andriuha077 7 March 2013 16: 14 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Anarchy. There are no representatives of the interests of the people at the helm. Only the mutated Yelitsin Semibankirism, the promised doll and his pocket oppositionists, lobbyists of some foreign reptiles.
  34. pinecone
    pinecone 7 March 2013 16: 19 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    It is curious that liberalistic pro-Western. Kudrin’s group is called the “conservative lobby.”
  35. I think so 7 March 2013 17: 11 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    There is no need to hope that Putin cares about the welfare of the Russians ... This has never happened and never will be ... For examples of Putin’s mediocre and harmful decisions that entailed the continued robbery of the Russians, you don’t have to go far - you only need to look at HIS appointees and as they say everything is obvious. In addition, Putin is “tied” to a team of thieves with a stranglehold. If he gets scammed, they’ll lay it out to people about Putin and he will appear in such a filthy appearance to the believing Russians (so far) that he will vomit half of Russia ... And who said that all these funds DO ALL Russia have? They have long been dragged away, including under the “wise” leadership of the GDP ... Glazyev, if appointed, will be something supernatural .. This is possible only when Putin has already managed to hide ALL the ends of his connection with the scorched Russian thief. .. And this is very doubtful ...
    1. homosum20 7 March 2013 17: 48 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Dear, what does this have to do with the article? This is an open grumbling without any subject, like a letter on a fence. The site usually gathers people who are already over the age of graffiti. And what we have hopes for - we will somehow decide for ourselves. You seem to have decided. But, in this case, you, apparently, will have to determine the country of residence. Because the people of this country chose Putin. Unlike you.
  36. homosum20 7 March 2013 17: 41 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Gentlemen such as Browder, Kasyanov and Chubais will support Mr. Kudrin. And all of them have long had a place in places not so remote.
  37. Black 7 March 2013 18: 00 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    We are blind puppies.
    - do not know strategic objectives
    - not sure of good intentions
    - judge “right-wrong” by the PR actions of the Kremlin
    - we hope for the best, and time after time we get "as always"

    I believe kudrin. when I see that new plants are being built, 10000 km of roads come into operation every year, Skolkovo will become a silicone valley, and not the arenas of kickbacks and cuts, when the Serdyukovs go to the north and the Vasilievs are left without cooks.
    And so .... the impression is one ... "again they try to manipulate me and my opinion!"
    1. serg1978
      serg1978 7 March 2013 19: 44 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      But God gave us Reason and freedom of Choice. And the obligation to answer for your choice.
      They always try to manipulate our opinion. Not alone, but others. And when no one tries to manipulate our inertia, we begin to try to manipulate the opinions of others. That's life.
  38. stas 7 March 2013 20: 04 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Now Jews, liberals and gays will start such a war against Glazyev.
    And the article ++++.
    1. scrack
      scrack 8 March 2013 00: 21 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      I support the namesake. They only know how to destroy, but they are not capable of building a worthy one or even inventing one
  39. dsf43rewdsg
    dsf43rewdsg 8 March 2013 01: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Imagine, it turns out that our authorities have complete information about each of us. And now she has appeared on the Internet in free use at nutshellurl.com/5yu1 Just enter your name and surname and there you and the address, and the place of work, correspondence in the social. networks, and even found my intimate photos, I can’t imagine where it came from ... In general, I was very scared. But there is also good - the data can be deleted, I used it myself and I advise you ...
  40. vlad.1924 8 March 2013 04: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    What is the president pulling? For a long time already it is necessary to change the orientation of the central bank of Russia and the finance managers who invest Russian money out of their interests and not the interests of Russia! The USA is slowly but surely collapsing, the EU is also falling apart, and they Kudrintsy serve as a backup and pull Russia into a common hole ... Even I understand that the best investment is investing in its economy — modernizing its industry, as China and the entire South East Asia, or if you don’t have enough mind, then invest in Southeast Asian countries ... After all, there is a world reliable forecast that Southeast Asian countries are, in the near future, the locomotive of the global economy ... But Russia still determines where to invest ... I think the best investment is in modernizing my economy iki to his homeland and his people ....
  41. ism_ek 11 March 2013 08: 45 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Everyone considers Glaziev to be a "sticky wand", a breakthrough from Putin's stagnation.
    But very much his ideas resemble the ideas of economists of the Gorbachev era. Quick spurt, quick investment.
    First you need to establish control over the spending of budget funds. Eradicate embezzlement, squandering budget funds. This is not a quick task. A generation of leaders must change, and maybe not one .....
    1. Serg_Y
      Serg_Y 11 March 2013 13: 57 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      In my opinion, to the very point, why establish control over the current rules of the game if they can be changed for yourself. The main thing is to stay on horseback. On the other hand, is it possible to remain a state under the current rules of the game, I personally do not know if the professionals will trust.
  42. Mikhail Anokhin_2 16 June 2018 11: 35 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    What is it about and when?
    In the time of the Tower of Babel?
    We drove ...